2015 major field test comparative data guide major field ... · 2015 comparative data guide - mft...
TRANSCRIPT
Copyright © 2015 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo and LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING. are registered
trademarks of Educational Testing Service (ETS).
2015 Major Field Test
Comparative Data Guide
Major Field Test for Chemistry
The annual Comparative Data Guide (CDG) contains tables of scaled scores and percentiles for individual student scores and institutional means drawn directly from senior test takers across the nation. The report provides descriptive statistics based on the number of students that have completed the Major Field Test (MFT) for Chemistry since it was released in September 2011 through June 2015. Information about an institution gathered through MFT administrations cannot be released in any form attributable to or identifiable with an individual institution. The anonymity of each institution’s performance is maintained by reporting only the aggregate performance of the selected reference group.
Below are descriptions of the various tables provided in this guide:
Individual Students Total Score/Subscore Distributions – The distributions in these tables may be used to interpret
individual student results by determining what percent of those taking the test at the selected institutions attained scores below that of a particular student. Each table shows scaled score intervals for Total Score and Subscores separately. By looking up the Total Score or Subscore and reading across the row to the corresponding number in the column headed “Percent Below,” the percent of individuals scoring below any interval can be determined.
Institutional Means Total Score/Subscore Distributions – The distributions in these tables present the number of institutions at each mean score level. These tables provide a way to compare the Total Score and Subscore means for your institution with those of other participating institutions you selected. These tables show the mean of means (or the average of the mean scores for those institutions/programs selected) as well as the standard deviations of those means.
Institutional Assessment Indicator Mean Score Distributions – The assessment indicator summary information in
these tables includes the frequency distribution of departmental/program means for each assessment indicator. These tables show the distribution of institutional rounded means as well as the average and standard deviations of those means.
Note that not all MFT titles in all subject areas generate subscores or assessment indicators. Please refer to the test content description for your subject area of interest at www.ets.org/mft/about/content to determine which score types you should expect to generate for your MFT test subject.
The following considerations should be kept in mind when interpreting comparative data:
This data should be considered comparative rather than normative because the institutions included in the data do not
represent proportionally the various types of higher education institutions and programs. The data are drawn entirely from institutions that choose to use MFT. Such a self-selected sample may not be representative of all institutions or programs.
The number of students tested and sampling procedures vary from one institution to another. Therefore, it is impossible to
verify that the students tested at each institution are representative of all the institution’s students in that program.
It is important that these comparisons involve students at approximately the same point in their educational careers. The
tables report data for seniors only. Students who are not seniors are excluded from these calculations.
The tables report data for institutions/programs that have tested five (5) or more seniors. Institutions/programs with fewer
than five (5) test takers are excluded from these calculations. No single institution accounts for more than 6% percent of all the students included.
For more information about this report or other ways the Major Field Tests can help your program, contact an ETS Advisor at [email protected] or call 1-800-745-0269.
The following tables include tests taken as of June 30, 2015.
MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide Page 2 ||DAK-4HMF||
2015 Comparative Data Guide - MFT for Chemistry
Institution List Data includes seniors from domestic institutions who tested between September 2011 and June 2015.
Alabama A&M University, AL Alabama State University, AL Albany State University, GA Albright College, PA Alma College, MI Angelo State University, TX Aquinas College (MI), MI Armstrong State University, GA Asbury University, KY
Augustana College (IL), IL Austin Peay State University, TN Ball State University, IN Barry University, FL Bellarmine University, KY Benedict College, SC Berry College, GA Bethel University (MN), MN Bethel University (TN), TN Birmingham-Southern College, AL Black Hills State University, SD Brigham Young University (ID), ID California Baptist University, CA California State Polytechnic University - Pomona, CA Calvin College, MI Campbell University - Buies Creek, NC Capital University, OH Cedar Crest College, PA Centre College, KY Christopher Newport University, VA Claflin University, SC Clayton State University, GA College of Charleston, SC College of Saint Benedict & Saint John's Univ., MN Colorado Mesa University, CO Colorado State University - Fort Collins, CO Colorado State University - Pueblo, CO Columbia College (MO), MO Columbus State University, GA Concordia College, MN Converse College, SC Covenant College, GA Delaware Valley College, PA Dickinson State University, ND Dordt College, IA East Carolina University, NC East Tennessee State University, TN East Texas Baptist University, TX Eastern Illinois University, IL Elizabeth City State University, NC Elizabethtown College, PA Erskine College, SC Fairmont State University, WV Fisk University, TN Florida International University, FL
Fort Valley State University, GA Freed-Hardeman University, TN Geneva College, PA George Fox University (OR), OR Georgetown College, KY Georgian Court University, NJ
Goshen College, IN Grove City College, PA Hamline University, MN Hampton University, VA High Point University, NC Hillsdale College, MI Houston Baptist University, TX Howard Payne University, TX Humboldt State University, CA
Huntingdon College, AL Illinois College, IL Indiana State University, IN Indiana Wesleyan University, IN Jamestown College, ND Juniata College, PA Kansas Wesleyan University, KS Kent State University, OH Lander University, SC Lane College, TN Langston University, OK Lawrence Technological University, MI Lebanon Valley College, PA Lenoir-Rhyne University, NC LeTourneau University, TX Lewis-Clark State College, ID Lipscomb University, TN Louisiana State University - Baton Rouge, LA Loyola University New Orleans , LA Lynchburg College, VA Macalester College, MN Malone University, OH Manhattan College, NY Marian University (IN), IN Mary Baldwin College, VA Mercer University, GA Messiah College, PA Methodist University, NC Millersville University of Pennsylvania, PA Millikin University, IL Mississippi College, MS Mississippi University for Women, MS Missouri Baptist University, MO Missouri Southern State University, MO Missouri State University, MO Missouri University of Science and Technology, MO Missouri Western State University, MO Morehead State University, KY Morehouse College, GA Mount St. Joseph University, OH Mount St. Mary's University, MD Mount Vernon Nazarene University, OH Muskingum University, OH Newman University, KS Nicholls State University, LA
North Central College, IL Northeastern State University, OK Northern State University, SD Northwest Nazarene University, ID Norwich University, VT Notre Dame of Maryland University, MD
MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide Page 3 ||DAK-4HMF||
Old Dominion University, VA Pace University - New York, NY Pacific Union College, CA Pfeiffer University, NC Point Loma Nazarene University, CA Prairie View A&M University, TX Presbyterian College, SC Providence College, RI Quincy University, IL Roger Williams University, RI Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, IN Rowan University, NJ Saint Anselm College, NH Saint Mary's University of Minnesota , MN Salem College, NC Salem State College, MA Schreiner University, TX Southeast Missouri State University, MO Southern Arkansas University, AR Southern Utah University, UT Southern Wesleyan University, SC Southwest Baptist University, MO Spelman College, GA
Spring Hill College, AL St. Bonaventure University, NY St. Edward's University, TX Stonehill College, MA SUNY at Oswego, NY SUNY at Plattsburgh, NY Tarleton State University, TX Tennessee Tech University, TN Tennessee Wesleyan College, TN Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi, TX Texas Lutheran University, TX Texas Southern University, TX Thomas More College, KY Tougaloo College, MS Transylvania University, KY Trinity Christian College, IL United States Air Force Academy, CO University of Arkansas - Little Rock, AR University of Central Arkansas, AR University of Central Florida, FL University of Central Missouri, MO
University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, CO University of Mary Hardin-Baylor, TX University of Mary Washington, VA University of Memphis, TN University of Missouri - Kansas City, MO University of Missouri - St. Louis, MO University of Mount Olive, NC University of Nebraska - Lincoln, NE University of Nebraska - Omaha, NE University of New Orleans, LA University of North Alabama, AL University of Pikeville, KY University of Redlands, CA University of Saint Francis (IN), IN University of San Diego, CA University of Sciences in Philadelphia, PA University of South Carolina - Upstate, SC University of Southern Indiana, IN University of St. Thomas (MN), MN University of Tennessee - Chattanooga, TN University of Tennessee - Knoxville, TN University of Tennessee at Martin, TN University of Texas at Tyler, TX
University of the Cumberlands, KY University of Virginia's College at Wise, The, VA University of Wisconsin - La Crosse, WI University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point, WI University of Wisconsin - Whitewater, WI Vanderbilt University, TN Virginia Military Institute, VA Virginia State University, VA Wagner College, NY Washington & Jefferson College, PA Washington and Lee University, VA Washington University in St. Louis, MO Wesleyan College, GA West Chester University, PA Wheaton College, IL Willamette University, OR Wilmington College, OH Winona State University, MN Winston-Salem State University, NC Xavier University of Louisiana, LA Yeshiva University, NY
Copyright © 2015 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo and LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING. are registered
trademarks of Educational Testing Service (ETS).
MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide Page 4 ||DAK-4HMF||
2015 Comparative Data Guide - MFT for Chemistry
Individual Students Total Score Distribution Data includes seniors from domestic institutions who tested between September 2011 and June 2015.
Number of Examinees
Mean Median Standard Deviation
6,964 148.2 146.0 14.7
Individual Students Total Score Distribution
Total Score Range (120 - 200)
Percent Below
185 - 200 99
184 98
183 98
182 98
181 97
180 97
179 96
178 96
177 95
176 95
175 94
174 93
173 93
172 92
171 91
170 89
169 88
168 87
167 86
166 85
165 83
164 82
163 81
162 79
161 78
160 76
159 74
158 73
157 71
156 69
155 67
154 66
153 64
152 62
151 60
150 58
149 56
148 53
147 51
146 49
145 46
144 44
143 42
142 37
141 34
140 31
MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide Page 5 ||DAK-4HMF||
Total Score Range (120 - 200)
Percent Below
139 29
138 27
137 24
136 22
135 20
134 15
133 13
132 11
131 10
130 8
129 6
128 4
127 3
126 2
125 2
120 - 124 1
Total Scores are reported as scaled scores. Percent Below based on percent below the lower limit of the score interval.
Copyright © 2015 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo and LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING. are registered
trademarks of Educational Testing Service (ETS).
MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide Page 6 ||DAK-4HMF||
2015 Comparative Data Guide - MFT for Chemistry 1
Individual Students Subscore Distribution Data includes seniors from domestic institutions who tested between September 2011 and June 2015.
Subscore Number of Examinees
Mean Median Standard Deviation
1: Physical Chemistry
6,964 48.1 48.0 15.1
2: Organic Chemistry
6,964 48.5 47.0 14.4
3: Inorganic Chemistry
6,964 48.4 46.0 14.8
4: Analytical Chemistry
6,964 48.2 47.0 14.5
Individual Students Subscore Distribution
Subscores Range (20 – 100)
S12 Percent Below
S22 Percent Below
S32 Percent Below
S42 Percent Below
86 - 100 99 99 99 99
85 98 99 99 99
84 98 99 98 99
83 98 98 98 98
82 97 98 97 98
81 97 97 97 97
80 96 97 97 97
79 96 97 95 97
78 96 96 95 95
77 94 96 95 95
76 94 94 93 95
75 94 94 93 93
74 92 94 93 93
73 92 92 93 93
72 92 92 91 91
71 92 89 91 91
70 89 89 91 91
69 89 89 87 88
68 89 86 87 88
67 85 86 87 88
66 85 84 83 84
65 85 84 83 84
64 81 84 83 84
63 81 80 83 80
62 81 80 78 80
61 75 80 78 80
60 75 75 78 75
59 75 75 72 75
58 70 75 72 75
57 70 71 72 69
56 70 71 66 69
55 70 65 66 69
MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide Page 7 ||DAK-4HMF||
Subscores Range (20 – 100)
S12 Percent Below
S22 Percent Below
S32 Percent Below
S42 Percent Below
54 64 65 66 63
53 64 65 66 63
52 64 60 60 63
51 57 60 60 63
50 57 60 60 56
49 57 54 52 56
48 49 54 52 56
47 49 47 52 49
46 49 47 44 49
45 42 47 44 41
44 42 40 44 41
43 42 40 37 41
42 34 33 37 33
41 34 33 37 33
40 34 33 29 33
39 27 26 29 26
38 27 26 29 26
37 27 19 20 26
36 20 19 20 19
35 20 19 20 19
34 20 13 13 19
33 13 13 13 12
32 13 9 13 12
31 13 9 7 8
30 8 5 7 8
29 8 5 7 8
28 8 5 4 4
27 4 3 4 4
26 4 3 4 4
25 2 1 1 2
24 2 1 1 2
23 2 1 1 1
20 - 22 1 1 1 1
1 Subscores for this test cannot be compared to testing years prior to 2011 due to changes in the Chesmistry Test that
were introduced in 2011.
2 Subscore 1: Physical Chemistry Subscore 2: Organic Chemistry
Subscore 3: Inorganic Chemistry Subscore 4: Analytical Chemistry
Copyright © 2015 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved.
ETS, the ETS logo and LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING. are registered
trademarks of Educational Testing Service (ETS).
MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide Page 8 ||DAK-4HMF||
2015 Comparative Data Guide - MFT for Chemistry
Institutional Means Total Score Distribution Data includes seniors from domestic institutions who tested between September 2011 and June 2015.
Number of Institutions
Mean Median Standard Deviation
208 147.9 148.0 9.6
Institutional Means Total Score Distribution
Mean Total Score Range (120 - 200)
Percent Below
170 - 200 99
169 98
168 97
167 97
166 97
165 96
164 95
163 93
162 91
161 90
160 87
159 85
158 82
157 80
156 75
155 72
154 70
153 68
152 67
151 63
150 58
149 53
148 49
147 43
146 38
145 36
144 32
143 29
142 25
141 24
140 19
139 18
138 15
137 13
136 9
135 8
134 6
133 6
132 4
131 3
130 2
120 - 129 1
Total Scores are reported as scaled scores.
Percent Below based on percent below the lower limit of the score interval.
Copyright © 2015 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved.
ETS, the ETS logo and LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING. are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service (ETS).
MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide Page 9 ||DAK-4HMF||
2015 Comparative Data Guide - MFT for Chemistry 1
Institutional Means Subscore Distribution Data includes seniors from domestic institutions who tested between September 2011 and June 2015.
Subscore Number of Examinees
Mean Median Standard Deviation
1: Physical Chemistry
208 48.1 47.0 9.2
2: Organic Chemistry
208 47.8 48.0 8.7
3: Inorganic Chemistry
208 48.5 48.0 9.0
4: Analytical Chemistry
208 48.2 48.0 8.7
Institutional Means Subscore Distribution
Subscores Range (20 – 100)
S12
Percent Below
S22
Percent Below
S32
Percent Below
S42
Percent Below
78 - 100 99 99 99 99
77 99 99 99 99
76 99 99 99 99
75 99 99 99 99
74 99 99 99 99
73 99 99 99 99
72 99 99 99 99
71 99 99 99 99
70 98 99 98 99
69 98 99 98 99
68 98 99 97 99
67 98 99 97 99
66 97 98 97 97
65 96 98 96 97
64 96 97 94 96
63 93 95 93 95
62 92 93 91 94
61 91 91 89 91
60 88 88 86 89
59 86 86 85 87
58 83 83 83 85
57 78 81 79 81
56 76 79 76 78
55 73 76 75 76
54 69 74 72 73
53 65 71 67 69
52 63 68 64 63
51 61 65 60 58
50 57 60 55 56
49 54 54 52 52
48 50 49 47 46
MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide Page 10 ||DAK-4HMF||
Subscores Range (20 – 100)
S12
Percent Below
S22
Percent Below
S32
Percent Below
S42
Percent Below
47 45 45 44 42
46 42 40 39 37
45 36 34 35 33
44 30 31 29 28
43 27 28 26 25
42 24 25 24 21
41 23 21 19 18
40 18 18 16 14
39 15 14 14 14
38 12 10 11 13
37 11 9 8 12
36 8 8 6 9
35 6 6 4 6
34 5 4 3 4
33 5 4 1 2
32 2 3 1 2
31 1 2 1 1
20 - 30 1 1 1 1
1 Subscores for this test cannot be compared to testing years prior to 2011 due to changes in the Chemistry Test that
were introduced in 2011. 2 Subscore 1: Physical Chemistry
Subscore 2: Organic Chemistry Subscore 3: Inorganic Chemistry Subscore 4: Analytical Chemistry
MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide Page 11 ||DAK-4HMF||
2015 Comparative Data Guide - MFT for Chemistry 1
Institutional Assessment Indicator Mean Score Distributions Data includes seniors from domestic institutions who tested between September 2011 and June 2015.
Assessment Indicator
Number of Institutions
Mean Median Standard Deviation
1: Biochemistry 208 47.9 48.0 9.3
2: Critical Thinking and
Reasoning 208 45.1 45.0 10.7
Institutional Assessment Indicator Mean Score Distributions
Mean Percent Correct
(0-100%)
A12
Percent Below
A22
Percent Below
76 - 100 99 99
75 99 99
74 99 99
73 99 99
72 99 99
71 99 99
70 99 99
69 99 98
68 99 97
67 99 97
66 98 97
65 96 96
64 94 95
63 93 94
62 93 93
61 92 91
60 91 91
59 87 87
58 84 86
57 80 84
56 77 82
55 74 80
54 73 76
53 73 73
52 65 71
51 62 69
50 54 66
49 51 64
48 48 60
47 41 57
46 39 54
45 32 48
44 29 42
43 25 39
MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide Page 12 ||DAK-4HMF||
Mean Percent Correct
(0-100%)
A12
Percent Below
A22
Percent Below
42 22 36
41 20 34
40 18 29
39 16 26
38 13 25
37 11 22
36 10 19
35 9 18
34 8 14
33 7 12
32 4 10
31 4 8
30 3 7
29 2 5
28 1 4
27 1 3
26 1 2
25 1 2
0 - 24 1 1
¹ Assessment Indicators for this test cannot be compared to testing years prior to 2011 due to changes in the Chemistry test that were introduced in 2011.
2 Assessment Indicator 1: Biochemistry
Assessment Indicator 2: Critical Thinking and Reasoning
Assessment Indicators are reported as percent correct. Percent Below based on percent below the lower limit of the score interval.
Copyright © 2015 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved.
ETS, the ETS logo and LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING. are registered
trademarks of Educational Testing Service (ETS).