2015 iwa conference cincinnati performance management & benchmarking rick bickerstaff edge...

43
2015 IWA Conference Cincinnati Performance Management & Benchmarking Rick Bickerstaff www.Competitive Edge Performance.net

Upload: john-marsh

Post on 24-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

2015 IWA ConferenceCincinnati

Performance Management &Benchmarking

Rick Bickerstaff

www.Competitive Edge Performance.net

What gets measured gets managed, and what gets managed gets done.

Measurement

“”

I. IntroductionII. StrategyIII. FrameworkIV. ResultsV. ComparisonsVI.AnalysisVII.DecisionsVIII.S.Y.S.T.E.M.

Agenda

2

CharlestonWater System

Whywe measure

Where have we been?• Results• Trends

Where are we?• Comparisons• Benchmarks• Best Practices

Where do we want to go?• Performance Projections• Customer Requirements• Targets

• Measurement results should:o Tell you what to improveo Help you prioritize what to focus ono Become a major input into your

organization’s goals and/or strategic plan

o Promote accountabilityo Facilitate continuous improvemento Satisfy stakeholder expectations

Whywe measure

• Measure:o What is most important to your

customers, stakeholders, and you.o What is critical to quality (CTQ)o Inputs, Process, Outputs (SIPOC)

Whatwe measure

• Measure:o Process efficiencyo Process effectivenesso Process adaptability

The MUSTS:I. Expectations must come from senior

leadershipII. Leadership must constantly direct focus

towards performance measurementIII. Leadership must constantly ask for resultsIV. Leadership must think critically

Leadershipmust drive it

Strategy

Framework

ResultsCompar

isons

Analysis

Decisions

Systematic processes

Strategy

Framework

ResultsCompar

isons

Analysis

Decisions

Strategy

Strategy Drives Measurement

2000Timeline

2002 2007

• Strategic Area #3 -

Measurement

• Reliable & sustainable measurement,

benchmarking and data analysis system• To drive data based decision making.

• Reliable & comparable benchmarking sources• Guidance for target setting• Systematic review & reporting process

Strategic Area

Strategic Goal

Charleston Water System’sStrategy

Strategy

Framework

ResultsCompar

isons

Analysis

Decisions

Develop the Framework

Definitions

PIs / KPIs

Leading

Lagging

CWS Measurement Hierarchy

Leadership

Results

Financial & Market Results

Customer Focused Results

Workforce Focused Results

Product & Process Results

Baldrige Criteria for Performance Excellence

=

Charleston Water System Measurement Hierarchy

Charleston Water System Measurement Hierarchy

CWS Strategy

Leadership

Team

Leadership

Results

Measurement Team

Financial &

Market Results

Customer Focus Team

Customer

Focused Results

Workforce Focus Team

Workforce

Focused Results

Operations Focus

Team

Product &

Process Results

Strategic Teams

KPIs

18% 18% 19% 19% 26%Weight

CWS Measurement Hierarchy

Leadership Results

Financial & Market Results

Debt Ratio

Return on Assets

Growth Rate

Customer Focused Results

Workforce Focused Results

Workforce Climate

Workforce Capacity

Workforce Development

Product & Process Results

KPI Leve

l

Roll U

p

30%

30%

40%PI Leve

l

Charleston Water System Measurement Hierarchy

CWS Measurement Hierarchy

OSHA Accident Rate

Workforce Capacity

Training Hours/Employee

Leadership Academy Graduates

Workforce Engagement

Lagging

Leading

Leading & Lagging Indicators

Things you can control

Things you can

influence

Strategy

Framework

ResultsCompar

isons

Analysis

Decisions

Capture theResults

Monitoring Plan

Collection Plan

Repository

Customer Requirements

Capture theResults

Results

www.ITWorx.comRepository(Home)

Strategy

Framework

Results

Comparisons

Analysis

Decisions

Compare your results

Benchmarking

Requirements

Customer Requirements

Capture theResults

Benchmarking

http://watereum.org/resources/resource-toolbox/

Effective Utility Management Charleston Water System’s Contributions

CWS participated in the development of the EUM Benchmarking Tool

Compare your results

Gap analyses were conducted using the tool on parts of the EUM.

Plans exist to: Complete gap analyses Use gap analyses to identify tactical benchmarking

actions (2015-2016)

Compare your results

Local (State)Regional

Florida Benchmarking Consortium North Carolina Local Government Performance Measurement

Project

BenchmarkingSources

National AWWA Benchmarking Program (QualServe, 2002) Baldrige Award Winners

BenchmarkingSources

International European Benchmarking Consortium International Benchmarking Network for Water &Sanitation

Utilities (IBNET) National Water & Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative

(Canada) Pacific Water & Wastes Association National Performance Report (Australia)

BenchmarkingSources

Strategy

Framework

ResultsCompar

isons

Analysis

Decisions

Analyzedata

Correlate

Root-cause

Validate

ValidationStatistical analysisCharts:

Histogram Pareto charts Pie charts Run charts Control charts Box plots

Correlation analysis (scatter diagrams)Root-cause analysis (RCA)Sigma performance

Analyze data

Strategy

Framework

Results

Comparisons

Analysis

Decisions

Decision making

Targets

Goals

Projections

Strategies

Data should tell us:What to work onWhen to work on itWhy to work on it (validated)How to work on it

Decisionmaking

Strategy

Framework

Results

Comparisons

Analysis

Decisions

Decision making

Adjust

Innovate

Improve

SystematicProcesses

S Y S T E M2

Managingthe Process

SystematicProcesses

S Y S T E M

Schedule

Yardstick

Standard

Team

Execute/Evaluate

Maintain

2

SystematicProcesses

S Y S T E M

Schedule

Yardstick

Standard

Team

Execute/Evaluate

Maintain

2

Adjust

SystematicProcesses

S Y S T E M

Schedule

Yardstick

Standard

Team

Execute/Evaluate

Maintain

2

Improve

Written:AgendasMeeting minutesReports

Visual:DisplaysTVsDashboardsBulletin boardsMobile devices

DataSharing

• Laser focus Discipline Starts at the top

• Resources Teams / Teamwork Software

• Continuous Evaluation Analysis Communication

• Use of results Decision making Continuous improvement

In ConclusionMeasurement Requires