2015 crw - rigging inspections: "it's not that bad"

51
It’s NOT That Bad Mike Riggs Rigging Institute, LLC

Upload: specialized-carriers-rigging-association

Post on 08-Apr-2017

987 views

Category:

Education


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

It’s NOT That Bad

Mike RiggsRigging Institute, LLC

Page 2: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

It’s Not THAT Bad!

It’s Not THAT Bad!

Page 3: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

It’s Not that Bad – Alloy Chain Slings

Alloy Chain Slings

Page 4: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

An alloy chain sling shall be removed from service if conditions such as the following are present:

(c) Excessive wear… “Minimum thickness on chain links shall not be below the values listed in Table 9-1.9.4.1”

It’s Not that Bad – Alloy Chain Slings

ASME B30.9-1.9.4

Page 5: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

Chain Sling WearChain normally wears at the interlink bearing points and at the side barrel of the link.

It’s Not that Bad – Alloy Chain Slings

INTERLINKBEARING POINT

SIDE BARREL

Page 6: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

Normal wear areas on a chain sling are at the compressive stress area of the links.

It’s Not that Bad – Alloy Chain Slings

gffg

Chain Sling Wear

Compressive Stress

Tensile Stress

Page 7: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

To determine loss, measure the questionable area with calipers or no-go gauges.

It’s Not that Bad – Alloy Chain Slings

Chain Sling Wear

Page 8: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

It takes very little wear beyond the minimum wear dimension, to cause a severe reduction of the chain’s ultimate strength.

It’s Not that Bad – Alloy Chain Slings

Chain Sling Wear

Page 9: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

It’s Not that Bad – Wire Rope Sleeves

Wire Rope Slings

Page 10: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

FLEMISH EYE

TURNBACK EYE

– Turnback Eye (Loopback) (not recommended)– Flemish Eye (recommended)

It’s Not that Bad – Wire Rope Sleeves

Wire Rope Sling FittingsMechanically spliced slings are fabricated in two ways:

Page 11: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

Damaged / Suspect Flemish Eye Sleeves.

It’s Not that Bad – Wire Rope Sleeves

Cracked Sleeve

Improper Press

A flemish eye splice develops 60% or more of the sling’s minimum break strength.

Wire Rope Sling Fittings

Page 12: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

Damaged / Suspect Turnback (loopback) Sleeves.

It’s Not that Bad – Wire Rope Sleeves

Cracked Aluminum SleeveCracked Steel Sleeve

Wire Rope Sling Fittings

Page 13: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

Aluminum Sleeve – Failed at 5,480 lbs

It’s Not that Bad – Wire Rope Sleeves

Steel Sleeve – Failure Load Unknown

Wire Rope Sling FittingsDamaged / Suspect Turnback (loopback) Sleeves.

Page 14: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

It’s Not that Bad – Wire Rope Sleeves

VRC: 5,000 lbs (2.5 tons) – Min. Break: 25,000 lbs1/2” Turnback Sling Testing – Worn Die

Page 15: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

It’s Not that Bad – Wire Rope Sleeves

1/2”

20,000

21,290

VRC: 5,000 lbs (2.5 tons) – Min. Break: 25,000 lbs1/2” Turnback Sling Testing – Worn Die

Page 16: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

It’s Not that Bad – Synthetic Web Cuts

Synthetic Web Slings

Page 17: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

It’s Not that Bad – Synthetic Web Cuts

Synthetic Web Sling Cuts

ASME B30.9-5.9.4 removal criteria states:“A synthetic webbing sling shall be removed from service if conditions such as the following are present…(d) holes, tears, cuts, or snags…”

Page 18: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

5 – Breaks: No Damage1/8” Cut1/4” Cut3/8” Cut1/2” Cut

It’s Not that Bad – Synthetic Web Cuts

EE1-903 Nylon Web Sling Cut Testing

Page 19: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

No Damage: 27,510 lbs

VRC: 4,800 lbs – Min. Break: 24,000 lbs

It’s Not that Bad – Synthetic Web Cuts

Actual Breaks

EE1-903 Nylon Web Sling Cut Testing

Page 20: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

1/8” Cut: 22,910 lbs

1/4” Cut: 17,670 lbs

It’s Not that Bad – Synthetic Web Cuts

VRC: 4,800 lbs – Min. Break: 24,000 lbsEE1-903 Nylon Web Sling Cut Testing

Actual Breaks

Page 21: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

3/8” Cut: 15,800 lbs

1/2” Cut: 14,000 lbs

It’s Not that Bad – Synthetic Web Cuts

VRC: 4,800 lbs – Min. Break: 24,000 lbsEE1-903 Nylon Web Sling Cut Testing

Actual Breaks

Page 22: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

No Damage:1/8” Cut:1/4” Cut:3/8” Cut:1/2” Cut:

Actual Breaks (lbs) % of Strength Loss

27,510 ……...….…… 0 % — +13% 22,910 …….…...…… 20% — 09%17,670 …….…..……. 36% ─ 26%15,800 ………..…….. 43% ─ 34%14,000 …………..….. 49% ─ 42%

It’s Not that Bad – Synthetic Web Cuts

Actual Minimum

VRC: 4,800 lbs – Min. Break: 24,000 lbsEE1-903 Nylon Web Sling Cut Testing

Page 23: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

It’s Not that Bad – Synthetic Web Cuts

VRC: 4,800 lbs – Min. Break: 24,000 lbsEE1-903 Nylon Web Sling Cut Testing – 2

Page 24: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

It’s Not that Bad – Synthetic Web Cuts

13,000

14,940

VRC: 4,800 lbs – Min. Break: 24,000 lbsEE1-903 Nylon Web Sling 1/2”

Page 25: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

UV Degradation

It’s Not that Bad – UV Degradation

Page 26: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

The main source of UV light is the sun. welding arcs, fluorescent lighting and Xenon light (used in automobile headlights).

Ultraviolet (UV) light sources.

It’s Not that Bad – UV Degradation

Page 27: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

It’s Not that Bad – UV Degradation

UV light has a shorter wavelength than violet light (the light we see) and is not visible to the human eye.

UV light degrades synthetic materials by transferring energy into the fibers often causing damage by breaking down the molecular bonds in the fiber structure.

Generally, darker colors provide better UV resistance than lighter colors and thicker materials resist UV light better than thinner.

Ultraviolet (UV) Stats.

Page 28: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

It’s Not that Bad – UV Degradation

Synthetic Web Slings

Page 29: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

Polyester web slings lost up to 30% of their strength during the first 12 months, then leveled off.

UV Degradation – Synthetic Web Slings

WSTDA UV Testing (2006)

Page 30: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

UV Degradation – Synthetic Web Slings

WSTDA UV Testing (2006)

Nylon web slings lost up to 50%-60% of their strength 36 months, with NO indication of leveling off.

Page 31: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

When a web sling is stiff and/or faded it is usually an indication of UV Degradation.

UV Degradation – Synthetic Web Slings

Recognizing UV Degradation

If the sling is constantly fuzzy through the webbing it is an indication of UV Degradation.

If you pop the sling and fibers float off the sling body it is an indication of UV Degradation.

Page 32: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

Fading / Some Fuzziness

Original Color

UV Degradation – Synthetic Web Slings

Recognizing UV Degradation

Page 33: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

Fuzziness

UV Degradation – Synthetic Web Slings

Recognizing UV Degradation

Page 34: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

UV Degradation – Synthetic Web Slings

Break Testing of Two Identical UV Damaged Slings

Test ID: 483 - EE2-602 x 20’ Nylon Web Sling - Tested in basket configuration

Test ID: 484 - EE2-602 x 20’ Nylon Web Sling - Tested in basket configuration

Vertical Basket Capacity = 8,800 lbsMinimum Break Strength = 44,000 lbs

Page 35: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

UV Degradation – Synthetic Web Slings

Test ID: 483 — EE2-602

Test ID: 484 — EE2-602

Actual Break: 24,790 lbs

Actual Break: 13,300 lbs

Page 36: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

71%

UV Degradation – Synthetic Web Slings

EE2-804 with UV Degradation & Small Snag in EyeVertical Basket Capacity: 45,600 lb / Minimum Basket Brk: 228,000 lbs

Page 37: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

Best – Black Protection

Better – Gray Protection

Poor – Treated

Worst – Untreated

UV Degradation – Synthetic Web Slings

Sling Protection

Page 38: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

UV Degradation – Synthetic Roundslings

Synthetic Roundslings

Page 39: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

It is difficult to determine the original color of this sling.

Synthetic Roundslings

Do roundslings lose strength when they are in this condition?

UV Degradation – Synthetic Roundslings

Page 40: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

Original Color

UV Degradation – Synthetic Roundslings

Synthetic Roundslings

Expect up to a 30% loss of strength in severe faded conditions.

Page 41: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

UV Degradation – Synthetic Roundslings

WSTDA RS-1 4.4.1 states:

“Polyester roundslings should be stored in a cool, dry and dark place to prevent loss of strength when not in use through exposure to ultra-violet rays.”

Synthetic Roundslings

Page 42: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

Recognizing UV Degradation1) When roundsling covers are stiff and/or faded it

is a strong indication of UV Degradation.

2) When a cover is faded beyond recognition, remove the sling from service, you can be sure there is UV degradation to the core fiber.

UV Degradation – Synthetic Roundslings

Synthetic Roundslings

Page 43: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

Original Testing - Results

UV Degradation – Synthetic Roundslings

Page 44: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

Fiber Type

No UV Exposure

No Cover

DBL Yellow Poly Cover

DBL Org-Red Poly

CoverDBL Black Poly Cover

CoverMax® Cover

Base Line Percentage of Strength LOST at 500 Hours of UV Exposure to Covers/Fiber

Polyester 100%

Aramid 100%

K-Spec® 100% N/A N/A N/A

36% 12% 9% 5% 2%

28% 26% 27% 9% 2%

12% 1.13%

UV Degradation – Synthetic Roundslings

Slingmax® Testing - Results

Page 45: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

UV Degradation – Synthetic Roundslings

Less light penetrates the covers that protect against UV the best.

Page 46: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

Which set of polyester fibers has 500 hours of UV exposure?

No exposure

500 hrs exposure

UV Degradation – Synthetic Roundslings

Slingmax® UV Degradation Testing

Page 47: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

DBL Wall Yellow Polyester Tubing exposure to UV

No exposure

500 hrs exposure

UV Degradation – Synthetic Roundslings

Slingmax® UV Degradation Testing

Page 48: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

No exposure

500 hrs exposure

UV Degradation – Synthetic Roundslings

DBL Wall Black Polyester Tubing exposure to UVSlingmax® UV Degradation Testing

Page 49: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

No exposure

500 hrs exposure

UV Degradation – Synthetic Roundslings

DBL Wall Cornermax® Tubing exposure to UVSlingmax® UV Degradation Testing

Page 50: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

Synthetic RoundslingsTesting has taught us that:

1) Most roundsling core fibers show no visible indications of damage due to UV exposure.

2) When covers show fading it is a strong indicator that UV degradation to the core fiber has begun and may be advanced.

3) Most HP fibers, EXCEPT Aramid, show more resistance to UV degradation than polyester.

4) Aramid fibers are the most adversely affected by UV.5) Dark and/or dense covers protect the load fiber best.

UV Degradation – Synthetic Roundslings

Page 51: 2015 CRW -  Rigging Inspections: "It's Not That Bad"

www.rigginginstitute.com

Thank you

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Mike Riggs

It’s Not THAT Bad!