2014 russell gordon delta sh new pdf
DESCRIPTION
ÂTRANSCRIPT
CONCLUSION • RSV infection leads to an IL-1β
response, from a range of cells.
• The SH protein of RSV inhibits
inflammasome function.
• Deletion of the SH gene modulates the
outcome of secondary RSV infection.
• RSV ΔSH is a vaccine candidate strain
which is protective to RSV infection
• We propose that this is via its pore
structure altering the K+ flux.
INHIBITION OF THE INFLAMMASOME BY THE SMALL
HYDROPHOBIC PROTEIN OF RESPIRATORY SYNCYTIAL VIRUS
Ryan F. Russell1, Jacqueline U. McDonald1, Ziyun Zhong1, Alex Bukreyev2, Peter L. Collins2, John S. Tregoning1 1Mucosal Infection and Immunity group, St Mary’s Campus, Imperial College London, UK.
2 Laboratory of Infectious Diseases, NIAID/NIH, MD, USA.
INTRODUCTION • Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infects most children in the first year of life and is a major single
cause of hospitalization in infants and young children.
• The small hydrophobic (SH) protein of RSV has recently been described as a viral pore protein
(viroporin) which forms a proton-selective channel (figure 1).
• The function of SH is unknown, but SH knockout viruses are partially attenuated in vivo and are
potential vaccine candidates.
• Here, we present evidence that SH is involved in evasion of the host immune response, inhibiting the
inflammasome.
Figure 1. Computational analysis by Gan et al
(2013) suggests that the SH protein forms a
pentamer containing a pore forming
transmembrane region, whose diameter allows only
for the passage of small molecules and ions.
Further studies reveal potential ion channel activity.
The SH proteins of other related viruses show
inflammasome modulating activity.
FIGURE 1. The SH protein of RSV encodes a viral pore
protein (viroporin) that can modulate the inflammasome.
4 7100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
Days after Challenge
RS
V L
gen
e co
pies
perg
Lun
g R
NA
Control RSV SH RSV A20
5
10
15
20
Ant
i-RS
V Ig
Gg
/ml
***
******
Control RSV SH RSV A20
25
50
75
100
125
Ant
i-RS
V Ig
Gg/
ml
***
******
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
85
90
95
100
105
Control
RSV SH
RSV A2
Days after Challenge
% O
rigin
al W
eigh
t
*** ***###
###
*###
*
4 70
5106
1107
2107
Days after Challenge
Lung
cel
l num
ber
*
**
4 70
2
4
6
8
Days after Challenge
CD
3+C
D8%
****
4 70
50
100
150
200
250
Days after Challenge
Lung
IL-1
pg/
ml
***
***
Control RSV SH RSV A20
10
20
30
40
50
RS
V (
M2)
Sp
ecifi
c C
D8
(% to
tal C
D8)
***
*
4 70
2
4
6
8
Days after Challenge
CD
3+C
D4+
(%)
*
**
A B C D
E F G H I
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
90
95
100
105
110
Days after infection
% O
rigin
al W
eig
ht
RSV SHRSV A2
***
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
104
105
106
107
108
109
Days after infection
RS
V L
ge
ne c
opie
s
pe
rg L
ung R
NA
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0
100
200
300
400
500
Days after infection
CX
CL1
pg/m
l **
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0
100
200
300
400
500
Days after infection
IL-6
pg
/ml
**
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Days after infection
IL-1
pg
/ml
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
106
107
Days after infection
Lung c
ell
num
ber
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
104
105
106
Days after infection
Lung C
D4 T
cells
*
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
104
105
106
Days after infection
Lung C
D8 T
cells
*
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
104
105
106
Days after infection
Lung N
K c
ells *
A B
D E F
C
G H I
0 20 40 60 80
0
200
400
600
800
1000
**
*
*
*
Hours after infection
IL-1
pg/m
l
0 20 40 60 80
0
500
1000
1500
**
*
*
Hours after infection
IL-1
pg/m
l
0 20 40 60 80
0
5
10
15
20
Hours after infection
IL-1
pg/m
l
RSV A2 RSV SH Control
0
50
100
150
200
IL-1
pg/m
l
*
0 20 40 60 80
0
5.0105
1.0106
1.5106
2.0106
Hours after infection
RS
V p
fu/m
l
RSV A2
RSV SH
A B C D E
P L + C o n P L + 1 A 8 C L + C o n C L + 1 A 8
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0 0
Lu
ng
IL
-1
pg
/ml * *
* * *
* * *
P L + C o n P L + 1 A 8 C L + C o n C L + 1 A 8
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
Lu
ng
IL
-6 p
g/m
l
* *
* *
P L + C o n P L + 1 A 8 C L + C o n C L + 1 A 8
0
2 0 0
4 0 0
6 0 0
8 0 0
1 0 0 0
Lu
ng
KC
pg
/ml
* *
* *
P L + C o n P L + 1 A 8 C L + C o n C L + 1 A 8
1 0 4
1 0 5
1 0 6
1 0 7
1 0 8
RS
V L
ge
ne
co
pie
s
pe
r
g L
un
g R
NA
P L + C o n P L + 1 A 8 C L + C o n C L + 1 A 8
0
5 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 0
1 5 0 0 0 0
Ly
6G
+ c
ell
co
un
t
* * *
* * *
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0
1 0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0
D a y s a fte r in fe c tio n
IL-1
Po
sit
ive
Ly
6G
+
* * * * *
* * *R S V A 2
C o n tro l
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0
5 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 5 0 0
D a y s a fte r in fe c tio n
IL-1
+C
D1
1c
+ M
HC
I lo
F4
/80
+
Ce
ll c
ou
nt
* * *
* * *
P L + C o n P L + 1 A 8 C L + C o n C L + 1 A 8
0
2 0 0 0
4 0 0 0
6 0 0 0
CD
11
c+
MH
CII
lo
F4
80
+
ce
ll c
ou
nt
* *
* *
*
A B
C D
E F
G H
FIGURE 2. RSV ΔSH is protective against RSV infection.
FIGURE 3. RSV ∆SH induces a greater IL-1B response than wild type in vitro.
FIGURE 4. RSV ∆SH is attenuated in vivo but induces a greater IL-1B
response than wild type.
FIGURE 5. IL-1B is produced by neutrophils and
macrophages in vivo.
Figure 2. Mice were infected with either RSV A2, ΔSH or control treated, 4 weeks later all mice were
challenged with RSV A2. Anti-RSV IgG before RSV challenge (A). Weight change (B), lung viral load
(C), lung IL-1B (D) and lung cell number (E) after infection. Lung CD4+ (F) and CD8+ (G) T cells on
day 4 and day 7. Lung RSV specific CD8 T cells on day 7 (H). Anti-RSV IgG day 7 (I).
Figure 4. Mice were infected intranasally with RSV A2 (wild type) or RSV lacking the SH gene (RSV
∆SH). Weight loss (A), lung viral load (B) and lung cell number (C) were measured after infection.
Lung CD4 T (D), CD8 T (E) and DX5+ NK (G) cells were measured by flow cytometry. IL-6 (G),
CXCL1/KC (H) and IL-1B (I) were measured in lung supernatants.
Figure 3. HEp-2 cells were infected with *** MOI RSV A2 or RSV ∆SH, viral load was assessed by
plaque assay (A). Supernatants were collected and analysed for IL-1B level by ELISA following infection
of HEp-2 cells (B), PHBE cells (C), THP-1 cells (D), and neutrophils (F). Points represent mean +/- SEM
of n=3 repeats of HEp2, PHBE and THP1 cells and 3 individual PBMC and neutrophil donors.
Figure 5. Mice were infected with RSV A2 intranasally. Expression of IL-1B
by Ly6G+ (neutrophils: A) and CD11c/MHCII lo/F480+ (alveolar
macrophages: B) was measured by flow cytometry at various time points
after infection. Mice were treated with anti-Ly6G depleting antibody (1A8) or
control antibody (Con) intraperitoneally, and clodronate liposomes (CL) or
empty liposomes (PL) intranasally prior to RSV A2 infection. Neutrophil (C)
and alveolar macrophage (D) numbers were analysed by flow cytometry,
RSV L gene (E) by RT-PCR and lung IL-1B (F), KC (G) and IL-6 (H) were
measured on day 1 after infection.
SH K+
Casp1
NLRP3
Pro IL-1β
Meet the
authors!