2014 pv performance modeling workshop: results from flash testing at multiple irradiance and...

22
RESULTS FROM FLASH TESTING AT MULTIPLE IRRADIANCES AND TEMPERATURES ACROSS FIVE PHOTOVOLTAIC TESTING LABS 3 rd PV Performance Modeling Workshop May 5, 2014, Santa Clara, CA Junaid H. Fatehi 1 , Cherif Kedir 2 , Charles Tumengko 3 , Nick Riedel 4 , John L. R. Watts 5 1 Yingli Green Energy Americas, San Francisco, CA 2 Renewable Energy Test Center, Fremont, CA 3 Intertek Testing Services, Lake Forest, CA 4 CFV Solar Test Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM 5 PV Evolution Labs, Berkeley, CA Published by Sandia National Laboratories with the permission of the authors.

Upload: sandia-national-laboratories-energy-climate-renewables

Post on 07-May-2015

385 views

Category:

Government & Nonprofit


0 download

DESCRIPTION

2014 PV Performance Modeling Workshop: Results from Flash Testing at Multiple Irradiance and Temperatures across Five Photovoltaic Testing Labs: Junaid Fatehi, Yingli Green Energy Americas

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2014 PV Performance Modeling Workshop: Results from Flash Testing at Multiple Irradiance and Temperatures across Five Photovoltaic Testing Labs: Junaid Fatehi, Yingli Green Energy

RESULTS FROM FLASH TESTING AT MULTIPLE IRRADIANCES AND

TEMPERATURES ACROSS FIVE PHOTOVOLTAIC TESTING LABS

3rd PV Performance Modeling Workshop

May 5, 2014, Santa Clara, CA

Junaid H. Fatehi1, Cherif Kedir2, Charles Tumengko3, Nick Riedel4, John L. R. Watts5

1Yingli Green Energy Americas, San Francisco, CA 2Renewable Energy Test Center, Fremont, CA

3Intertek Testing Services, Lake Forest, CA 4CFV Solar Test Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM

5PV Evolution Labs, Berkeley, CA

Published by Sandia National Laboratories with the permission of the authors.

Page 2: 2014 PV Performance Modeling Workshop: Results from Flash Testing at Multiple Irradiance and Temperatures across Five Photovoltaic Testing Labs: Junaid Fatehi, Yingli Green Energy

Background

• For reliable system energy yield modeling, it is important to

characterize the dependence of PV module performance on

irradiance and operating temperature, for conversion into module

performance models used in energy simulation

• This study was coordinated by Yingli Green Energy Americas and it

investigates the contribution of data source in the measurement and

understanding of PV module behavior

• Three light-stabilized multicrystalline silicon PV modules from Yingli

Solar were sent to five testing labs for round robin characterization

Page 3: 2014 PV Performance Modeling Workshop: Results from Flash Testing at Multiple Irradiance and Temperatures across Five Photovoltaic Testing Labs: Junaid Fatehi, Yingli Green Energy

Participating Labs • CFV Solar Test Laboratory

– Albuquerque, NM

• Intertek Testing Services – Lake Forest, CA

• Renewable Energy Test Center – Fremont, CA

• PV Evolution Labs – Berkeley, CA

• Yingli Americas PV Testing Lab – South San Francisco, CA

All labs are assigned a random number for anonymous reporting.

Page 4: 2014 PV Performance Modeling Workshop: Results from Flash Testing at Multiple Irradiance and Temperatures across Five Photovoltaic Testing Labs: Junaid Fatehi, Yingli Green Energy

Testing Scope

• Multiple Irradiance Testing – Testing between 100 W/m2 and 1,000 W/m2

– Minimum testing interval of 100 W/m2

– Fixed testing temperature of 25 oC

• Temperature Coefficient Testing – Testing between 25 oC and 65 oC

– Maximum testing interval of 5 oC

– Fixed testing irradiance of 1,000 W/m2

Page 5: 2014 PV Performance Modeling Workshop: Results from Flash Testing at Multiple Irradiance and Temperatures across Five Photovoltaic Testing Labs: Junaid Fatehi, Yingli Green Energy

Testing Notes

• All five participating labs:

– Conducted electroluminescence imaging to

screen for transportation damage (none reported)

– Conducted temperature coefficient testing indoors

– Calibrated with a module tested at Fraunhofer

ISE and traceable to PTB

Page 6: 2014 PV Performance Modeling Workshop: Results from Flash Testing at Multiple Irradiance and Temperatures across Five Photovoltaic Testing Labs: Junaid Fatehi, Yingli Green Energy

Standard Test Conditions 1,000 W/m2, 25 oC, AM 1.5g

Page 7: 2014 PV Performance Modeling Workshop: Results from Flash Testing at Multiple Irradiance and Temperatures across Five Photovoltaic Testing Labs: Junaid Fatehi, Yingli Green Energy

Module S/N: 124804060126

Lab Isc (A) Voc (V) Imp (A) Vmp (V) Pmp (W)

1 8.785 45.69 8.281 36.53 302.5

2 8.756 45.60 8.211 36.43 299.1

3 8.826 45.55 8.256 36.41 300.6

4 8.799 45.60 8.264 36.60 302.5

5 8.874 45.59 8.300 36.77 305.1

Lab Isc Voc Imp Vmp Pmp

1 -0.26 % 0.18 % 0.22 % -0.05 % 0.18 %

2 -0.59 % -0.01 % -0.63 % -0.33 % -0.96 %

3 0.21 % -0.12 % -0.08 % -0.37 % -0.45 %

4 -0.10 % -0.01 % 0.02 % 0.15 % 0.18 %

5 0.75 % -0.04 % 0.45 % 0.60 % 1.05 %

Test Results:

Difference from the Mean:

Page 8: 2014 PV Performance Modeling Workshop: Results from Flash Testing at Multiple Irradiance and Temperatures across Five Photovoltaic Testing Labs: Junaid Fatehi, Yingli Green Energy

Module S/N: 124804060149

Lab Isc (A) Voc (V) Imp (A) Vmp (V) Pmp (W)

1 8.768 45.67 8.272 36.55 302.3

2 8.732 45.56 8.185 36.51 298.9

3 8.788 45.59 8.224 36.62 301.1

4 8.753 45.61 8.245 36.69 302.5

5 8.860 45.61 8.285 36.86 305.4

Lab Isc Voc Imp Vmp Pmp

1 -0.14 % 0.13 % 0.36 % -0.26 % 0.10 %

2 -0.55 % -0.10 % -0.69 % -0.36 % -1.05 %

3 0.09 % -0.04 % -0.23 % -0.07 % -0.30 %

4 -0.31 % 0.00 % 0.04 % 0.11 % 0.15 %

5 0.91 % 0.01 % 0.52 % 0.58 % 1.10 %

Test Results:

Difference from the Mean:

Page 9: 2014 PV Performance Modeling Workshop: Results from Flash Testing at Multiple Irradiance and Temperatures across Five Photovoltaic Testing Labs: Junaid Fatehi, Yingli Green Energy

Module S/N: 124804060310

Lab Isc (A) Voc (V) Imp (A) Vmp (V) Pmp (W)

1 8.741 45.62 8.220 36.51 300.1

2 8.718 45.50 8.144 36.42 296.6

3 8.725 45.50 8.158 36.61 298.6

4 8.740 45.49 8.204 36.56 299.9

5 8.858 45.51 8.232 36.77 302.7

Lab Isc Voc Imp Vmp Pmp

1 -0.18 % 0.22 % 0.34 % -0.17 % 0.17 %

2 -0.44 % -0.05 % -0.58 % -0.42 % -1.00 %

3 -0.36 % -0.06 % -0.41 % 0.09 % -0.32 %

4 -0.19 % -0.07 % 0.16 % -0.04 % 0.11 %

5 1.16 % -0.04 % 0.49 % 0.55 % 1.04 %

Test Results:

Difference from the Mean:

Page 10: 2014 PV Performance Modeling Workshop: Results from Flash Testing at Multiple Irradiance and Temperatures across Five Photovoltaic Testing Labs: Junaid Fatehi, Yingli Green Energy

Multiple Irradiance Testing 25 oC, AM 1.5g

Page 11: 2014 PV Performance Modeling Workshop: Results from Flash Testing at Multiple Irradiance and Temperatures across Five Photovoltaic Testing Labs: Junaid Fatehi, Yingli Green Energy

Relative Efficiency Metrics

• Relative Efficiency

– 𝐸𝑓𝑓𝑅𝑒𝑙𝐺=

𝑃𝑚𝑝𝐺∗1000 𝑊/𝑚2

𝐺

𝑃𝑚𝑝1000− 1

• Self-Referenced Relative Efficiency

– 𝐸𝑓𝑓𝑆𝑒𝑙𝑓_𝑅𝑒𝑙𝐺=

𝑃𝑚𝑝𝐺∗𝐼𝑠𝑐1000

𝐼𝑠𝑐𝐺

𝑃𝑚𝑝1000− 1

Page 12: 2014 PV Performance Modeling Workshop: Results from Flash Testing at Multiple Irradiance and Temperatures across Five Photovoltaic Testing Labs: Junaid Fatehi, Yingli Green Energy

Absolute Efficiency Metrics

• Absolute Efficiency

– 𝐸𝑓𝑓𝐴𝑏𝑠𝐺=

𝑃𝑚𝑝𝐺

𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 ∗𝐺

• Self-Referenced Absolute Efficiency

– 𝐸𝑓𝑓𝑆𝑒𝑙𝑓_𝐴𝑏𝑠𝐺=

𝑃𝑚𝑝𝐺

𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 ∗𝐼𝑠𝑐𝐺

𝐼𝑠𝑐1000∗1000 𝑊/𝑚2

Page 13: 2014 PV Performance Modeling Workshop: Results from Flash Testing at Multiple Irradiance and Temperatures across Five Photovoltaic Testing Labs: Junaid Fatehi, Yingli Green Energy

Module S/N: 124804060126

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000-8

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

Relative Efficiency

Irradiance (W/m2)

Ch

an

ge

in

Eff

icie

ncy (

%)

Lab 1

Lab 2

Lab 3

Lab 4

Lab 5

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000-8

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

Self-Referenced Relative Efficiency

Irradiance (W/m2)

Ch

an

ge

in

Eff

icie

ncy (

%)

Lab 1

Lab 2

Lab 3

Lab 4

Lab 5

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 100014.2

14.4

14.6

14.8

15.0

15.2

15.4

15.6

15.8

Absolute Efficiency

Irradiance (W/m2)

Eff

icie

ncy (

%)

Lab 1

Lab 2

Lab 3

Lab 4

Lab 5

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 100014.2

14.4

14.6

14.8

15.0

15.2

15.4

15.6

15.8

Self-Referenced Absolute Efficiency

Irradiance (W/m2)

Eff

icie

ncy (

%)

Lab 1

Lab 2

Lab 3

Lab 4

Lab 5

Page 14: 2014 PV Performance Modeling Workshop: Results from Flash Testing at Multiple Irradiance and Temperatures across Five Photovoltaic Testing Labs: Junaid Fatehi, Yingli Green Energy

Module S/N: 124804060149

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000-8

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

Relative Efficiency

Irradiance (W/m2)

Ch

an

ge

in

Eff

icie

ncy (

%)

Lab 1

Lab 2

Lab 3

Lab 4

Lab 5

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000-8

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

Self-Referenced Relative Efficiency

Irradiance (W/m2)

Ch

an

ge

in

Eff

icie

ncy (

%)

Lab 1

Lab 2

Lab 3

Lab 4

Lab 5

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 100014.2

14.4

14.6

14.8

15.0

15.2

15.4

15.6

15.8

Absolute Efficiency

Irradiance (W/m2)

Eff

icie

ncy (

%)

Lab 1

Lab 2

Lab 3

Lab 4

Lab 5

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 100014.2

14.4

14.6

14.8

15.0

15.2

15.4

15.6

15.8

Self-Referenced Absolute Efficiency

Irradiance (W/m2)

Eff

icie

ncy (

%)

Lab 1

Lab 2

Lab 3

Lab 4

Lab 5

Page 15: 2014 PV Performance Modeling Workshop: Results from Flash Testing at Multiple Irradiance and Temperatures across Five Photovoltaic Testing Labs: Junaid Fatehi, Yingli Green Energy

Module S/N: 124804060310

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000-9

-8

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

Relative Efficiency

Irradiance (W/m2)

Ch

an

ge

in

Eff

icie

ncy (

%)

Lab 1

Lab 2

Lab 3

Lab 4

Lab 5

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000-9

-8

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

Self-Referenced Relative Efficiency

Irradiance (W/m2)

Ch

an

ge

in

Eff

icie

ncy (

%)

Lab 1

Lab 2

Lab 3

Lab 4

Lab 5

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 100014.0

14.2

14.4

14.6

14.8

15.0

15.2

15.4

15.6

15.8

Absolute Efficiency

Irradiance (W/m2)

Eff

icie

ncy (

%)

Lab 1

Lab 2

Lab 3

Lab 4

Lab 5

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 100014.0

14.2

14.4

14.6

14.8

15.0

15.2

15.4

15.6

15.8

Self-Referenced Absolute Efficiency

Irradiance (W/m2)

Eff

icie

ncy (

%)

Lab 1

Lab 2

Lab 3

Lab 4

Lab 5

Page 16: 2014 PV Performance Modeling Workshop: Results from Flash Testing at Multiple Irradiance and Temperatures across Five Photovoltaic Testing Labs: Junaid Fatehi, Yingli Green Energy

Temperature Coefficient Testing 1,000 W/m2, AM 1.5g

Page 17: 2014 PV Performance Modeling Workshop: Results from Flash Testing at Multiple Irradiance and Temperatures across Five Photovoltaic Testing Labs: Junaid Fatehi, Yingli Green Energy

Short Circuit Current Temperature Coefficient

Lab 1 Lab 2 Lab 3 Lab 4 Lab 50.045

0.050

0.055

0.060%

/

CIsc

Module S/N: 124804060126

Module S/N: 124804060149

Module S/N: 124804060310

Page 18: 2014 PV Performance Modeling Workshop: Results from Flash Testing at Multiple Irradiance and Temperatures across Five Photovoltaic Testing Labs: Junaid Fatehi, Yingli Green Energy

Open Circuit Voltage Temperature Coefficient

Lab 1 Lab 2 Lab 3 Lab 4 Lab 5-0.345

-0.340

-0.335

-0.330

-0.325

-0.320

-0.315

-0.310

-0.305

% /

C

Voc

Module S/N: 124804060126

Module S/N: 124804060149

Module S/N: 124804060310

Page 19: 2014 PV Performance Modeling Workshop: Results from Flash Testing at Multiple Irradiance and Temperatures across Five Photovoltaic Testing Labs: Junaid Fatehi, Yingli Green Energy

Maximum Power Temperature Coefficient

Lab 1 Lab 2 Lab 3 Lab 4 Lab 5-0.47

-0.46

-0.45

-0.44

-0.43

-0.42

-0.41

-0.40%

/

CPmp

Module S/N: 124804060126

Module S/N: 124804060149

Module S/N: 124804060310

Page 20: 2014 PV Performance Modeling Workshop: Results from Flash Testing at Multiple Irradiance and Temperatures across Five Photovoltaic Testing Labs: Junaid Fatehi, Yingli Green Energy

Conclusions

• Self-referencing irradiance results in smoother efficiency curves and better relative efficiency agreement between labs

• Three out of five labs have good agreement on Voc temperature coefficients and moderate agreement on Pmp temperature coefficients

Page 21: 2014 PV Performance Modeling Workshop: Results from Flash Testing at Multiple Irradiance and Temperatures across Five Photovoltaic Testing Labs: Junaid Fatehi, Yingli Green Energy

Thank You

Contact Junaid H. Fatehi at [email protected] for questions and comments.

Page 22: 2014 PV Performance Modeling Workshop: Results from Flash Testing at Multiple Irradiance and Temperatures across Five Photovoltaic Testing Labs: Junaid Fatehi, Yingli Green Energy

For Discussion

* Annual energy yield estimates were performed in PVsyst for a fixed system design and using .PAN files created from each participating lab’s measurement data in accordance with “Systematic Approaches to Ensure Correct Representation of Measured Multi-Irradiance Module Performance in PV System Energy Production Forecasting Software Programs”, presented at Sandia's 2013 PV Performance Modeling Workshop by Kenneth J. Sauer and Thomas Roessler.

Deviation in estimated annual energy yield from the mean for each location.*

-0.8%

-0.6%

-0.4%

-0.2%

0.0%

0.2%

0.4%

0.6%Antofagasta, Chile Berlin, Germany Phoenix, USA Trivandrum, India

Lab 1

Lab 2

Lab 3

Lab 4

Lab 5