2014 future of mason survey results
DESCRIPTION
The following packet contains key points of information and results from a FCBR member funded statistically valid community survey on public opinion of the Mason Corridor in Fort Collins. FCBR is pleased to share this with the community to improve the likelihood of success for this community defining project, especially as it impacts housing and livability.TRANSCRIPT
Future of Mason Survey
Prepared for the Fort Collins Board of REALTORS® and
presented to the community as a free resource by the REALTOR®
Party and American Strategies.
This statistically valid community survey was conducted to help
ensure the success of the Mason Corridor by outline general
community understandings and to identify potential
opportunities/challenges to the immediate and long term success
of this community shaping housing, transit, and livability
project.
For more information visit www.fcbr.org/housingfuture ,
www.fcbr.org/FutureofMasonSurvey, or Like Protecting Our Housing
Future on Facebook
Future of Mason Survey- Key Points of Consideration
The following items have been identified by FCBR staff as key points of consideration related to the 2014 Future of Mason Survey. For more information and key points be sure to review the key findings identified in the American Strategies Report and statistically valid community survey itself. Should you have questions please contact Clint at 970-402-0852 or [email protected].
Why did FCBR choose to do a survey on Mason?
• To provide the community with statistically valid information • To improve the likelihood of the Mason Corridor’s success • Because Fort Collins is at a crossroad for housing, transit, and livability • Because it is critical that our community realize the opportunities and challenges related to Mason’s success • Because housing affordability is a concern for Fort Collins and Mason will play a critical role for decades to come • Because we promised our members that we would utilize their investments in Advocacy for the betterment of Ft. Collins
Key General Survey Results & Implications:
• 94% say Fort Collins offers Excellent/Good Quality of Life o Fort Collins won’t lose a significant number of people to out migration and continued in migration is likely o Fort Collins need pragmatic and utilitarian Planning based on anticipated growth
• 93% of respondents said owning a car is important for transportation with 67% saying it’s very important o Planning efforts involving Manson will need to take our love of car’s into consideration
• There is greater awareness of MAX than there is for Mason o Mason Corridor is more than Bus Rapid Transit. We must make sure housing and livability are considered
• The general awareness of Mason/MAX is limited o It is crucial to raise awareness about Mason and its potential impact on housing and livability to improve chances
for success in these key quality of life areas
Key Housing Results & Implications:
• The Mason Corridor will serve as the core of our Housing Future and Fort Collins must think strategically to promote
housing diversity and achievability for all wage earners. • Housing needs for low income earners is 20 points higher than those with moderate incomes
o Fort Collins yet to recognize our challenge with housing affordability applies to all income earners • 6 in 10 residents oppose increased height restrictions
o Without areas of greater density the future of affordability, availability, and transit will be in question • According to respondents affordable housing for working/middle class income earners is least likely outcome of
the corridor’s development o Fort Collins must explore how to ensure that Mason will offer a greater variety of homes and apartments for people
with working and middle class incomes. • Significant majority of respondents believe that a greater variety of housing options will be available, like
apartment buildings, duplexes, & townhomes because of Mason. o There is a disconnect between these types of housing being available and their perceived ability to lessen the cost
of housing. o Density to respondents does not increase affordability.
Parking & Height Key Results & Implications:
• Parking & Building Heights are primarily obstacles to Masons’ development according to respondents o Parking & height are emotion based arguments that need changed to practicum based discussions.
• Parking, for housing and business, was identified as the biggest obstacle for the Mason Corridor’s success o Fort Collins must weigh all future impacts along with the current impacts as the corridor starts to build out with
transit in mind. We should not forego tomorrow’s opportunities based on today’s challenges. o Parking like the corridor needs to be addressed holistically and take into consideration our long term strategy
for this corridor and our community. o The cost of parking, especially structured parking, will have a significant impact on housing costs.
• 57% believe Fort Collins should keep existing height limits
o Height along the corridor will help to alleviate the need for height elsewhere. If not on Mason….then where? o Density via height will significantly increase the chance that housing affordability and quality transit are
available in the future o An investment in Height along this corridor will help to address our need for more housing units in a way that
limits upward developments impact on the entire community. o If we aren’t willing to invest in height along this corridor then we must open up to more 2-3- &4 story buildings
in every neighborhood in our growth management area. • Nearly 60% feel that it won’t be a challenge to attract developers who will build a variety of housing options,
like townhomes, condominiums, and apartment buildings o Fort Collins has a history of high quality locally developed projects o Fiscal and political realities for Transit Oriented development projects along Mason make it more difficult o Just because Fort Collins allows this type of development to occur doesn’t mean it will without catalyst projects
Proactively & Positively Pursuing a Better Future by utilizing the Mason Survey Results
• Now that FCBR and the community have a better grasp on the opportunities and challenges to Mason’s success FCBR’s next steps will be to pursue Smart Growth Grants available to us via our member’s investments from the National Association of REALTORS®.
• FCBR will continue to work proactively with the City on the upcoming discussions of Housing Affordability and Parking Strategies along Mason and asks others to join in these important conversations.
• The survey demonstrates that the community is concerned about housing affordability and diversity. FCBR will utilize this information and our Affordable=Achievable campaign to continue to lead the conversation about the need to protect our entire housing spectrum.
• FCBR’s leadership will continue to explore new and innovative approaches to our Advocacy efforts. Especially if FCBR can utilize our members investments in a way that returns value to the entire community and promotes short/long term Housing Sustainability.
• Find Your voice in this important conversation and join these community defining discussions and policy decisions. • Help FCBR Protect Our Housing and support our Affordable=Achievable campaign efforts
For more information visit www.fcbr.org/housingfuture , www.fcbr.org/FutureofMasonSurvey, or Like Protecting Our Housing Future on Facebook
Fort Collins Board of REALTORS®
Report on Citywide Smart Growth Survey
Slide 1
Executive Summary
Most Fort Collins residents have heard at least some information about the Mason Corridor and MAX development
projects. Their knowledge, however, is limited as only one-third have heard “a lot” of information and just 19 percent describe themselves as “very familiar” with the new development. The challenge for proponents is to deepen residents’ understanding
about the project and the personal transit, housing, recreational and business opportunities it affords them. Parking and opposition to loosening building
height restrictions are seen as the primary obstacles to successful implementation of the Mason Corridor project.
Slide 2
Executive SummaryBroad awareness of MAX and Mason Corridor. While only one-third report having heard a lot about the projects, most residents have heard at least something about MAX (72 percent heard a lot or some) or the Mason Corridor (62 percent). Awareness is higher among residents over the age of 50 and college graduates and lower among younger residents, singles and non-college graduates.
Residents mostly favorable about Mason Corridor, but feelings lack intensity. After hearing a brief description of the project, 80 percent have a favorable opinion about it. However, just 36 percent are very favorable, with 44 percent only somewhat favorable.
Almost half will ride MAX at least occasionally. Forty-six percent think they will ride MAX for travel to work, school or other reasons. Singles, those under the age of 50 and men are the most likely to say they will use the bus. The generic numbers drop considerably when residents are asked how they will use the bus. One-quarter say the will utilize it for errands or to get to CSU. Only 14 percent overall will use it for their commute to work. However, 41 percent say they will use the bus occasionally for recreation.
Note that those who say they are most likely to use MAX are currently among the least informed about the project.
Slide 3
Executive Summary
Confidence in MAX. A strong majority (59 percent) agree that a highly likely outcome of the Mason Corridor development program is that MAX will provide convenient and dependable bus service throughout the day. Only 32 percent see reliable service as being an obstacle to successful development.
Business and shopping most likely outcomes. Residents see more shopping and increased business along the corridor as the most likely outcomes for the development project. They are less likely to believe that there will be a greater variety of housing options, especially for people with working and middle-class incomes.
Parking and building heights primary obstacles. Finding space for parking at new businesses or residences is perceived to be the top obstacle that will make it difficult for the Mason Corridor to develop and grow as planned. Community opposition to tall buildings is also problematic (30 percent huge obstacle; 63 percent huge or medium).
Slide 4
Executive Summary
Fort Collins offers an excellent quality of life. A majority (57 percent) of residents describe the quality of life in Fort Collins as “excellent.” With another 37 percent describing the quality of life as “good,” fully nine-in-ten are positive about the quality of life in the city.
Not enough CSU parking, low-income housing or, for some, public transportation.Close to two-thirds say there is “too little” parking around CSU, and a majority feel that there is not enough housing in the city for people with low incomes. Residents are split when it comes to public transportation: 44 percent feel there is the right amount but a nearly identical 42 percent say there is too little.
Public supports height limits. Most residents (57 percent) think Fort Collins should keep the existing height limits on buildings. Only 37 percent would like to allow taller buildings.
Slide 5
Environment and Mood
Slide 6
Slide 7
How would you describe the quality of life in Fort Collins - excellent, good, just fair or poor?
Fort Collins Offers Exceptional Quality of Life
57% Excellent
37%Good
5% Fair /Poor
94% Total Excellent/Good
Slide 8
Do you think there is too much, too little, or the right amount of each of the following in Fort Collins?
City Lacks Enough Parking and Low Income HousingMany Note Lack of Enough Public Transit
62
55
42
36
3128 28
2523
11 10
1922
44
50
61
47
62
67
4650
61
2 15
2 24 5 4
9
31
2117
21
1012
6
20
5 5
23
7 80
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Parking around Colorado State
University
Housing for people with low
incomes
Public transportation
Housing for people with moderate incomes
Parking around businesses and
stores
Parking near large housing developments
Shops or restaurants
within an easy walk of your
house
Safe routes for riding bikes to
work and shopping
Housing for students
New houses and apartments being built
New stores and offices being
built
% Too Little % Right Amount % Too Much % Don't Know
Slide 9
As you may know Fort Collins now limits how high buildings can be constructed in order to maintain the city’s historic views. Some people believe taller building should be allowed in some downtown and business areas to accommodate
the city’s growing population and businesses, and to limit sprawl and development outside of Fort Collins. Do you think Fort Collins should keep its existing height limits or allow taller buildings to be built in some areas?
Most Favor Existing Limits on Building HeightsBig Gender Gap on the Issue
5765
47 4353
3728
4754
39
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Total Women Men College Educated Men
Non College Men
% Keep Limits % Allow Taller Buildings
Mason Corridor and MAX
Slide 10
Slide 11
Now, on a slightly different subject, how much, if anything, have you seen, read or heard about the MAX Bus Rapid Transit system – a
lot, some, not too much, or nothing at all?
Most Have At Least Some Awareness of MAX and Mason Corridor Projects
But Few Have Heard “A Lot” About the Projects
35% A Lot
37% Some
15% Not Too
Much
13% Nothing
At All
Seen/Heard/Read About MAX
And how much, if anything have you seen, read or heard about the development of Mason Corridor in Fort Collins -– a lot, some, not too
much, or nothing at all?
30% A Lot
32% Some
18% Not Too
Much
18% Nothing
At All
Seen/Heard/Read About Mason Corridor
Slide 12
Now, on a slightly different subject, how much, if anything, have you seen, read or heard about the MAX Bus Rapid Transit system – a lot, some, not too much, or nothing at all?
Older and College Residents Are Most InformedYounger and Non-College Graduates Least Informed
35
58 5747 44 42 40
30 29 26 25 25
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Seen/Heard/Read About MAX - % A Lot
Slide 13
Just so that everyone taking this survey has the same information, let me read you a description of these projects.
The Mason Corridor is a five-mile, north-south byway from Cherry Street to south of Harmony Road. It combines a bicycle and pedestrian trail with a restricted lane for a new Bus Rapid Transit system called MAX. The Mason Corridor project will connect downtown, Colorado State University, and
local business and neighborhoods. The corridor also provides new opportunities for business, residential and recreational development.
Based on what you know, would you say you have a very favorable, somewhat favorable, somewhat unfavorable or very unfavorable opinion of the Mason Corridor development project?
After Hearing Description, Residents Overwhelmingly Favorable Towards Mason Corridor Project
36% Very 16%
Total
80% Total
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Favorable Unfavorable
3650 46 44 44 40
0102030405060
% Very Favorable
Most likely to be VERY favorable
Slide 14
Once it is complete, do you think you will ride MAX, the new bus service, for travel to work, school, errands or other reasons?
Almost Half Say They Will Ride MAX
4648
6
% Yes % No % Don't Know
4655
4351
41
54
35
5745
57
41
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
% Yes
Total Key distinctions by party ID, gender, age, marital status and phone type for interview
Slide 15
Once it is complete, do you think you will ride MAX, the new bus service, for travel to work, school, errands or other reasons?
Poster Child for Likely MAX Rider: A Young, Single Man
46
62 6357 56
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Total Younger Men
Age 18-29 Single Younger Non College
% Yes
Slide 16
(ASKED OF THOSE WHO INDICATED THEY WILL RIDE MAX) Please tell me if you think you would use MAX for each of the following...
Many Will Use MAX Just for RecreationErrands and School Next Top Uses
41
26 2214
6
21 2532
51 51 51 51
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
For recreation, like going out to eat, listening to music or visiting a park
To run errands, like shopping or medical
appointments
To go to school or the CSU campus
Commuting to and from work
% Yes % No % Won't Ride MAX At All
Slide 17
Now I am going to read a number of different things that may happen along with the development of the Mason Corridor and the MAX Bus Rapid Transit System. After I read each one, please tell me how likely it is that each one
will occur once construction of the Mason Corridor and MAX are complete.
Business and Shopping Most Likely Outcomes
14
23
23
33
37
43
48
59
50
66
70
63
75
79
86
90
0 20 40 60 80 100
A greater variety of affordable homes and apartments will be available for people with working and middle-class incomes
More good jobs will come to the area
A greater variety of housing options will be available, like apartment buildings, duplexes and townhomes
There won't be enough places to park
There will be more apartment buildings for students
There will be more shopping and entertainment opportunities
Increased business along the corridor will result in more tax revenue for the city
The MAX bus will provide convenient and dependable service throughout the day
% Definitely Will Happen/Will Very Likely Happen % Total Likely to Happen
Slide 18
Now I am going to read a number of different things that may happen along with the development of the Mason Corridor and the MAX Bus Rapid Transit System. After I read each one, please tell me how likely it is that each one
will occur once construction of the Mason Corridor and MAX are complete.
Younger and Non-College Residents More Optimistic About Positive Outcomes
Total Age 18-49 Age 50+ Non-College College
Convenient and dependable service +84 +94 +69 +83 +83
Increased business +74 +84 +64 +73 +76
Shopping and entertainment +62 +75 +47 +65 +60
Apartments for students +55 +62 +42 +63 +49
Variety of housing options +43 +53 +30 +54 +34
More good jobs +36 +44 +29 +54 +26
Not enough parking +33 +20 +47 +27 +35
Affordable housing +9 +19 -5 +26 -3
Net Difference: Likely to Happen (Definitely, Very Likely, Somewhat Likely) – Not Likely to Happen (Not That Likely, Not At All Likely)
Slide 19
Some people say that there may be some obstacles that may make it difficult for the Mason Corridor to develop and grow as planned. I am going to read you a list of these obstacles. After I read each one please tell me whether you think that is a huge
obstacle to the development of Mason Corridor, a medium-size obstacle, a small obstacle, or not an obstacle at all to the development of the Mason Corridor.
Parking and Building Heights Primary Obstacles
10
10
10
30
31
33
32
38
41
63
70
69
0 20 40 60 80
Providing timely and reliable bus service
Attracting developers who will build a variety of housing options, like town homes, condominiums and apartment buildings
Attracting enough new businesses
Community resistance to tall buildings
Finding parking space for new businesses
Finding parking space for new housing developments
% Huge Obstacle % Huge/Medium-Size Obstacle
Survey MethodologyAmerican Strategies, Inc. designed and administered this telephone survey conducted by professional interviewers. The survey reached 400 adults, 18 years or older. The survey was conducted February 10 - 12, 2014.
Telephone numbers were generated by a random selection of voting age population residents. 30% of respondents were reached on a wireless phone. The sample was stratified by ward. Quotas were assigned to reflect the proportion of residents in each of these areas to the overall voting age population. The data were weighted by age to ensure an accurate reflection of the population. The sample size with these weights applied is 400.
In interpreting survey results, all sample surveys are subject to possible sampling error: that is, the results of a survey may differ from those which would be obtained if the entire population were interviewed. The size of the sampling error depends upon both the total number of respondents in the survey and the percentage distribution of responses to a particular question. For example, if a response to a given question to which all respondents answered was 50%, we could be 95% confident that the true percentage would fall within plus or minus 4.9% of this percentage or between 45.1% and 54.9%. The table below represents the estimated sampling error for different percentage distributions of responses.
Slide 20