2013 integrated resource plan - · pdf file2013 integrated resource plan ... west 3,161 3,183...

Download 2013 Integrated Resource Plan - · PDF file2013 Integrated Resource Plan ... West 3,161 3,183 3,267 3,332 3,374 3,414 3,474 3,512 3,544 3,582 3,616 3,667 3,698 ... Future of Demand

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: ngotruc

Post on 13-Feb-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 2013

    Integrated Resource Plan

    September 14, 2012

    Environmental Compliance Update

    Portfolio Development Cases

    Load Forecast

    Load and Resource Balance

  • Agenda

    Public Input Meeting Schedule Update

    Environmental Compliance Update

    Portfolio Development Cases

    Load Forecast

    IRP Scenarios

    GRD Recommendations

    Lunch, 30 min. (11:30 am PT / 12:30 MT)

    Load Forecast (continued)

    Capacity Load and Resource Balance2

  • IRP Public Meeting Schedule Update

    September 24 Public conference call: Planning Reserve Margin study results

    Price curve scenarios

    October 23 and 24 Portfolio development results

    PaR risk assessment

    November 5 Transmission system benefit toolkit

    Portfolio development discussion, continued

    November 27 PaR model results

    Flexible resource capacity needs assessment

    December 14 (new date) Preferred portfolio, action plan

    January 31, 2013 Draft report review; electric vehicle/smart grid

    3

  • ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE UPDATE

  • Regulation Impacts Mitigation Timing

    Regional Haze/Visibility

    Ownership in 26 units; 19 are operated by PacifiCorp. BART-eligible units include:

    Naughton 1-3Jim Bridger 1-4Dave Johnston 3 & 4WyodakHunter 1 & 2Huntington 1 & 2Cholla 4Hayden 1 & 2Craig 1 & 2

    Scrubbers, baghouses, LNBs, SCRs; costs for yet to be completed projects required by state issued permits and implementation plans included in current business plan.

    Source specific Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) to meet technology and emissions rate requirements.

    SO2 Milestones and Backstop Trading Program with better than BART results.

    As required by stateissued permits and implementation plans; or as expeditiously as possible, but within 5 years of EPA approval of SIP.

    Review every 5 10 years for reasonable progress.

    Natural conditions by 2064.

    Litigation underway

    Utility Mercury and Air ToxicsStandards (MATS)

    All PacifiCorp coal-fueled plants; all units expected to meet non-mercury metals and acid gas limits with current/planned controls except Carbon 1 & 2.

    Mercury reductions required at all units operated by PacifiCorp except Hunter & Huntington.

    Scrubbers for acid gases; activated carbon injection, sorbent injection, oxidizers and particulate control for mercury; particulate control for non-mercury metals.

    Overlap with Regional Haze. Small, un-scrubbedunits at risk of not achieving compliance.

    April 2015 compliance deadline

    Depending on unit-specificcircumstances, including system reliability concerns, compliance delay potential up to 1 to 2 years.

    Litigation pending

    Environmental Regulatory Drivers Air Quality

    5

  • Wyoming Regional Haze SIP/FIP for NOx and PM

    Facility Wyoming SIP EPA Proposal

    Naughton Unit 1 Existing/in-service LNB/OFA @ 0.26 lb/mmBtu

    Existing ESPs with 0.04 lb/mmBtu PM limit

    Approved

    Approved

    Naughton Unit 2 Existing/in-service LNB/OFA @ 0.26 lb/mmBtuExisting ESPs with 0.04 lb/mmBtu PM limit

    Approved

    Approved

    Naughton Unit 3 SCR & baghouse by 12/31/2014 with NOx @ 0.07lbs/mmBtuBaghouse for PM control with 0.025 lb/mmBtu limit

    Approved

    Approved

    Dave Johnston

    Unit 3

    Existing/ins-service LNB/OFA with emission limit of 0.28 lb/mmBtu

    Existing baghouse with PM limit of 0.015 lb/mmBtu

    Disapproved Addition of SNCR @

    0.19 lb/mmBtu; Baghouse approved

    Dave Johnston

    Unit 4

    LNB/OFA with emission limit of 0.15 lb/mmBtu

    Existing baghouse with PM limit of 0.015 lb/mmBtu

    Approved

    Approved

    Jim Bridger Unit 1 SCR or equivalent to achieve 0.07 lb/mmBtu by 12/31/22

    Existing ESP with PM 0.03 lb/mmBtu

    Disapproved-SCR within 5 years*

    Approved

    Jim Bridger Unit 2 SCR or equivalent to achieve 0.07 lb/mmBtu by 12/31/21

    Existing ESP with PM 0.03 lb/mmBtu

    Disapproved-SCR within 5 years*

    Approved

    Jim Bridger Unit 3 SCR or equivalent to achieve 0.07 lb/mmBtu by 12/31/15

    Existing ESP with PM 0.03 lb/mmBtu

    Disagreed with long term strategy but

    approved. ESP approved.

    Jim Bridger Unit 4 SCR or equivalent to achieve 0.07 lb/mmBtu by 12/31/15

    Existing ESP with PM 0.03 lb/mmBtu

    Disagreed with long term strategy but

    approved

    Approved

    Wyodak Existing/in-service LNB/OFA with emission limit of 0.23 lb/mmBtu

    Existing baghouse with PM 0.015 lb/mmBtu

    Disapproved Addition of SNCR

    within 5 yrs

    Approved

    Dave Johnston

    Units 1 and 2

    No additional controls during initial planning period Disapproved Addition of LNB/OFA at

    0.20 lb/mmBtu no later than 7/31/186

  • Status of Regional Haze Actions

    State Public Comment

    Period

    Final EPA Action

    Wyoming NOx and PM

    Wyoming SO2

    Closed 8/31/12

    Closed 7/23/12

    Expected by 10/15/12

    NM, UT & WY Varying dates

    Utah SO2, NOx and PM Closed 7/16/12 Preliminary action expected

    10/31/12; final action dependent

    on submittal of 5-factor analysis

    and revision to SIP

    Arizona - SO2, NOx and PM Closes 9/18/12 Expected 11/15/12

    Colorado Closed 3/8/12 Expected 9/10/12

    All states Potential

    impacts from Cross-State

    Air Pollution Rule decision

    Appeal by 10/5/12

    7

  • Environmental Regulatory Drivers Water & Waste

    Proposed

    Regulation

    Impacts Mitigation Timing

    Proposed - Clean

    Water Act 316(b)

    cooling water intake

    structures

    PacifiCorp operated units:

    Closed-cycle cooling:

    Jim Bridger 1-4

    Naughton 1-3

    Gadsby 1-3

    Hunter 1-3 (x2)

    Carbon 1 & 2

    Huntington 1 & 2

    Dave Johnston 4

    Once-through cooling:

    Dave Johnston 1-3

    Demonstrate best technology

    available for minimizing adverse

    environmental impact.

    Reduce impingement through

    changes in screens or decrease

    velocity; assess entrainment

    mortality. Conduct studies to

    determine impacts in 2014.

    Unknown Dependent upon

    issuance of final rule,

    proposal would require

    compliance upon permit

    renewal but no later than 8

    years after final rule.

    Previous deadline of 7/24/12

    extended to 6/27/13

    Proposed - Coal

    combustion

    byproduct regulation

    PacifiCorp operated units;

    16 surface impoundments

    6 landfills

    EPA has not yet determined the

    applicable regulatory treatment

    (Subtitle C or D). Under either

    regulatory treatment, existing unlined

    surface impoundments would need to

    be closed. All new landfills are being

    constructed to meet liner

    requirements.

    Unknown

    Rule not expected to be final

    until late in 2012; closure of

    unlined impoundments

    required within 5 years of final

    rule.

    Deadline lawsuit pending in

    D.C. Circuit

    8

  • Other Environmental and Related Issues

    Potential

    Regulation

    Impacts Mitigation Timing

    Effluent limit guidelines

    for steam generating

    point sources

    Unknown Unknown Proposed rule deferred

    to 11/20/12; final rule

    4/28/14

    GHG NSPS for existing

    sources

    Unknown Unknown Unknown

    Federal climate change

    regulation

    Unknown Unknown Unknown

    Carbon tax Unknown Unknown Unknown

    Production Tax Credit

    for wind/renewables

    Current

    expiration date of

    12/31/12

    One-year

    extension?

    Senate Finance

    Committee tax

    extenders ( 307)

    Unknown

    Federal RPS Unknown Unknown Unknown

    9

  • PORTFOLIO DEVELOPMENT CASES

  • Please refer to the handouts

    Stakeholder recommendation log

    Portfolio Development Cases

    11

  • LOAD FORECAST

  • Agenda

    Peak Load Forecast

    Electric industry load growth expectations

    Industrial class updates

    Industrial regression vs. probability-based forecast methodology

    High and low load growth scenario

    2011 IRP GDS Recommendation status

    13

  • Peak Load Forecast Summary

    The Peak Load Forecast decreased by 523 MW in 2016 or 4.8 percent relative to the IRP Update

    Industrial forecast changes represent approximately 80% of the load forecast change (energy) in 2016 New planned self-generation facility by Kennecott (270

    MW)

    Expected continued self-generation by the Companys larger industrial customers

    Lower expectations of new and existing load growth in the industrial class

    The commercial class forecast is lower due to reduced expectations of data center loads and more recent load information

    Residential load is relatively flat across all states

    14

  • PacifiCorp System Peak Load Forecast

    Change

    The decrease in 2016 in both the IRP

    Update and current load forecast is due to

    the expiration of the BPA Idaho Exchange

    contract

    15

  • PacifiCorp East Peak Load Forecast Change

    16

    2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030

    2011 IRP Update - East 6,981 6,993 7,151 7,403 7,611 7,468 7,727 7,882 8,034 8,195 8,360 8,500 8,644 8,806 8,979 9,154 9,324 9,482 9,658 9,832

    July 2012 Forecast - East 6,981 6,857 6,920 7,061 7,188 6,994 7,105 7,217 7,337 7,455 7,584 7,697 7,802 7,907 8,017