2012 pe review: s&w management
DESCRIPTION
2012 PE Review: S&W Management. Michael C. Hirschi , PhD, PE, D.WRE Senior Engineer Waterborne Environmental, Inc. [email protected] also Professor Emeritus University of Illinois . Acknowledgements: Chris Henry, I-C PE Review (2006-2009) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
2012 PE Review:S&W Management
Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRESenior Engineer
Waterborne Environmental, [email protected]
also Professor EmeritusUniversity of Illinois
![Page 2: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Acknowledgements:
Chris Henry, I-C PE Review (2006-2009)Rod Huffman, PE Review coordinator (thru 2011)
![Page 3: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Session Topics
• Soil & Water Basics Review• Evapotranspiration• Subsurface Drainage• Irrigation• Nutrient Management
![Page 4: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
S&W Basics Review
• Soil makeup• Infiltration & soil-water• Soil-Water-Plant Relations
![Page 5: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Subsurface Drainage
• Basic issues• Design considerations• System sizing• System installation
![Page 6: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Irrigation
• Plant water use• Types of irrigation
– Sprinkler– Flood– Drip
• Design considerations
![Page 7: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Nutrient Management
• Soil loadings• Application issues
![Page 8: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
A few comments• Material outlined is about 3 weeks or more in a
3-semester hour class. I’m compressing at least 6 hours of lecture and 3 laboratories into 2 hours, so I will:– Review highlights and critical points– Do example problems
• You need to:– Review and tab references– Do additional example problems, or at least
thoroughly review examples in references
![Page 9: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Basics – Soil Make Up
• Mineral• Water• Air• Organic Matter
![Page 10: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Mineral Component - Particles
• Sand• Silt• Clay• Aggregates
– Silt & Sand sizes– Less dense than primary particles
![Page 11: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Particle Size Classifications
![Page 12: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
USDA Texture Triangle
![Page 13: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Example
After soil sample dispersal to ensure only primary particles are measured, a sample is determined to be 20% clay, 30% silt and 50% sand. What is the USDA soil texture?
A: Sandy Clay LoamB: Sandy LoamC: LoamD: Clay Loam
![Page 14: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Solution
Answer: C, Loam
20% Clay
30% Silt
![Page 15: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Infiltration & soil-water• Infiltration is the passage of water through the
soil-air interface into pores within the soil matrix• Movement once infiltrated can be capillary flow
or macropore flow. The latter is a direct connection from the soil surface to lower portions of the soil profile because of root holes, worm burrows, or other continuous opening
• Infiltrated water can reappear as surface runoff via “interflow” and subsurface drainage
![Page 16: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Soil, water, air
The inter-particle space (voids) is filled with either water or air. The amount of voids depends upon the soil texture and the condition (ie. tilled, compacted, etc.).
![Page 17: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Water (moisture) content• Special terms reflect the fraction of voids filled
with water (all vary by texture and condition):– Saturation: All voids are filled with water– Field Saturation: Natural “saturated” moisture content
which is lower than full saturation due to air that is trapped.
– Field capacity: Water that can leave pores by gravity has done so (0.1 to 0.33 bars)
– Wilting point: Water that is extractable by plant roots is gone (15 bars)
– Hygroscopic point: Water that can be removed by all usual means is gone (but some remains, 30 bars)
![Page 18: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Soil Water Holding Capacity
(inches-water/foot-soil)Soil Texture Range Average
Sand 0.4 - 1.0 0.8 Sandy Loam 1.0 - 1.5 1.3 Loam 1.0 - 2.0 1.6 Silt Loam 1.3 – 2.6 2.0 Clay Loam 1.3 – 2.6 2.0 Clay 1.4 – 2.4 1.8
![Page 20: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Water States by Soil Texture
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Sand SandyLoam
Loam Silt Loam ClayLoam
Clay
Vol
umet
ric
Wat
er c
onte
nt
Gravitational
Plant Available
Unavailable
![Page 21: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Commentary• Later, when we discuss drainage, it is the gravitational
water that is of interest, eg. saturation down to field capacity. The volume of this water, the hydraulic characteristics of the soil in question, and the wet-condition-tolerance and value of the crop being grown dictate the drainage system design and its feasibility.
• When we consider irrigation, plant available water (AW) is that held between field capacity and wilting point. It is this water that we manage via irrigation to supply water to plants. The volume of AW the soil can hold within the crop root-zone, the crop value and water use, and the crop tolerance of dry conditions dictate irrigation design and feasibility.
![Page 22: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Moisture “release” curve
-10cm
-100cm
-1000cm
-10000cm
![Page 23: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Any questions on general soil and water basics?
![Page 24: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Evapotranspiration (ET)
• Evaporation• Crop water use• Reference Crops• Pan Evaporation• Crop Coefficients
![Page 25: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Evaporation
• Transfer of water from liquid to vapor state• Tabulated as “lake evaporation” across the
US.
Generally, evaporationexceeds precipitationwest of the Mississippi River.
![Page 26: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Example
• The mean annual lake evaporation in inches in Amarillo, TX (panhandle), is most nearly:
A. 50B. 65C. 75D. 85
![Page 27: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Evaporation
Fangmeier et al. (2006), pg 56
![Page 28: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Evaporation
The mean annual lake evaporation in inches in Amarillo, TX (panhandle), is most nearly:
A. 50B. 65C. 75D. 85
= 1900mm/25.4 mm/in = 75 in, so answer is C
![Page 29: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Evapotranspiration (ET)
• Combined Evaporation and Transpiration• Also called “consumptive use”• Useful to predict soil water deficit • Estimation methods (predict ETo, which is
for Reference Crop)– Evaporation Pan– Penman-Monteith (see example in Fangmeier
et al., 2006, pages 64-66)
![Page 30: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
ET vs. Precipitation
![Page 31: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Reference Crops
• Alfalfa (comparable to field crops)• Grass (easy to maintain under weather
station, data can be related to alfalfa data)
![Page 32: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Crop Coefficients
• Relate crops at various stages of growth to reference crops
• ETc = Kc x ETref
![Page 33: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Crop Coefficients
Both figures: Fangmeier et al. (2006)page 70
![Page 34: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Crop Coefficients, by crop & stage
Fangmeier et al. (2006)page 71
![Page 35: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Crop growth stages
Fangmeier et al. (2006) page 71
![Page 36: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Example
Estimate ETc for corn (maize) in Sioux City, Iowa if the ETref is 8mm/day on July 1. Planting date was April 15.
A: 8mmB: 9mmC: 10mmD: 11mm
![Page 37: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
SolutionETc = Kc x ETref
Initial growth stage is 20 days, to May 5Development stage is 40 days, to June 9Mid stage is 50 days, to July 29So, on July 15, in Mid-stage, so Kc is 1.2
ETc = Kc x ETref = 1.2 x 9 = 10.8mm, or 11mm (D)
Hint: Follow Fangmeier example 4.4
![Page 38: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Any questions on ET?
![Page 39: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Drainage• Removal of excess water• Benefits include
– More days to work in field– Less crop stress due to high moisture– Earlier germination because of warmer soil
• Liabilities include– Expense– Potential water quality issues– Outlet required, may need pump
![Page 40: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Objective of Drainage is Financial Benefit
• Optimize crop growth– Increase yield– Reduce wetness-based disease– Reduce variability within fields and from year to year
• Improve timeliness of field work– May use smaller equipment– May increase acreage– May reduce labor costs
• Increase value of land
![Page 41: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Drainage types• Surface
– Basic enhancement of flow patterns– Surface grading/planing– Surface ditching
• Subsurface– Irregular– Regular
• Watertable Management
![Page 42: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Subsurface Drainage
• Removes gravitational water only• Degree of drainage specified as depth/day• System design dictated by crop, soil,
location, topography and more…• Can be used to manage watertable down
or up• Changes hydrologic response of field and
if widely installed, the watershed
![Page 43: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
HYDROLOGIC CYCLE (with tiles)
![Page 44: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Design Considerations
• Soil type• Crop to be grown (value and response to
wet conditions)• Outlet• Topography
![Page 45: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
100
Tile Density
Prof
itabi
lity
Cost/Acre Crop Yield Rate of ReturnC
ost o
r Yie
ld R
atio
(%)
Spacing
![Page 46: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Drainage system design
• Capacity to remove water is expressed as depth/day (eg. 3/8 in/day)
• Spacing, maximum and minimum depth (absolute minimum of 24” without special protection), and maximum and minimum slope are dictated by soil and topography
![Page 47: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Depth/Spacing Choices
![Page 48: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Excellent Reference:ASABE Standards
The material that follows is directly from ASABE EP480, issued MAR1998 (R2008), “Design of Subsurface Drains in Humid Areas”
![Page 49: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Drain Spacing
![Page 50: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Diagram for Hooghoudt Eq.
![Page 51: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Drain Spacing by Hooghoudt Eq
![Page 52: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Area Drained
![Page 53: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
![Page 54: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
CPT Capacity
![Page 55: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
ExampleA subsurface drainage system is to be installed on
a square 160 acres (1/4 section) in East Central Illinois. The Drainage Coefficient is 3/8”/day and the Illinois Drainage Guide indicates a 120’ spacing at 4’ depth. The proposed slope is 0.1%. What diameter CPT is needed for each lateral?
A: 3”B: 4”C: 5”D: 6”
![Page 56: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Solution
A square 160 acres is a ½ mile on each side, or 2640’. A spacing of 120’ gives an area for each lateral of 120x2640 or 316800 sq.ft. If the system removes 0.375”/day, the flow rate needs to be 316800ft2*0.375in/day/12in/ft/24hr/day/3600s/hr or 0.115 cfs.
Enter the chart
![Page 57: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Answer: D, 6”
![Page 58: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Irrigation• Supplements rainfall• Need and design dictated by crop, soil, location,
topography, water availability, energy price, and more…
• Simplistic description: Use the soil as your water tank– Deplete it to some predetermined safe level– Refill it as needed– Don’t overtop and waste water (runoff)
• Plant Available Water is soil moisture held between Field Capacity and Wilting Point.
![Page 59: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Irrigation methods• Sprinkler (entire area is covered)• Surface (flood, furrow)• Drip (trickle, only plant root zone is watered)• Subirrigation
![Page 60: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Information needed for design• Soil texture and profile water storage• Soil infiltration rate• Water source• Available flow and pressure• Water quality• Water cost• Irrigated area• Elevation changes on site• Plants to be irrigated, root depth• Plant water use (inches/day)
![Page 61: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Design decisions and specific computed data needs
• How much do we let the soil-water deplete prior to irrigation (“management allowed depletion”, MAD, % as decimal, typically 40-50%, though can vary depending upon crop and climate)?
• How much water is available to the plant within its root zone (total amount is “available water”, AW, in inches)?
• How much water will we replace with each irrigation (equal to MAD * AW or “readily available water”, RAW, in inches)?
• How much total water do we need per irrigation cycle (equal to RAW*total irrigated area/efficiency)?
• How often do we need to irrigate the same area of plants (“irrigation interval”, equal to AW/(plant water use, in/day))?
All these concepts and equations are in any basic book or chapter on irrigation, such as Fangmeier et al. (2006).
![Page 62: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Available Water, AW• Soils vary in their characteristics by depth• Soil surveys have information on each soil by
depth• For example, consider the AW with depth for two
Illinois soils (data from WebSoilSurvey):
Layer Drummer SiCL Plainfield Sand0-9” 0.18 in/in 0.07 in/in
9-18” 0.17 in/in 0.06 in/in
18-27” 0.16 in/in 0.06 in/in
27-36” 0.16 in/in 0.06 in/in
![Page 63: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
AW for Corn
• If we assume a 36” rooting depth for corn on either soil, we get the following AW:
• Drummer: AW=0.18*9+0.17*9+0.16*18= 6.03”, so 6.0” in root zone
• Plainfield: AW=0.07*9+0.06*27=2.25”, so 2.3” in root zone
![Page 64: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Irrigation Interval
• So, given those 2 soils, and corn has a 0.25 in/d water use, if no rain, how many days before all available water is depleted?
• Drummer: 6”/.25ipd = 24days• Plainfield: 2.3”/.25ipd=9days
Now you know why there are many irrigated acres of Plainfield and few irrigated acres of Drummer
![Page 65: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
ExampleYou are designing a sprinkler irrigation system for
a pick-your-own strawberry field. Your references indicate that strawberries use 0.25 in/day. The soil profile has a field capacity value of 0.36 in/in and a wilting point value of 0.24 in/in. The rooting depth of strawberries is 9”. You don’t wish to deplete your soil moisture below 50% available water. How much will you irrigate and how often? Assume 100% efficiency
A: 1” every 7 days; B: 0.5” every 2 days; C: 0.25” every day; D: Not enough information
![Page 66: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Solution
Plant available water (AW) in the root zone is (0.36in/in-0.24in/in)*9in = 1”. The amount of water you wish to replace is half that amount (MAD), or 0.5” (RAW), which is your irrigation depth. Given the strawberries use 0.25 ipd, you will have to irrigate 0.5” (irrigation depth) every 2 days (irrigation interval) if it doesn’t rain.
Answer: B
![Page 67: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Lateral Size• Assume you will use a single lateral of pipe that you are
able to move across the strawberries. It is Schedule 40 PVC and you chose four Rainbird 20JA impact sprinklers. The technical specs indicate the nozzles deliver 4.5gpm at 40psi while delivering water to a radius of 40’. Your plan for the lateral is to have the 1st sprinkler at 20’, then at 40’ intervals. What size PVC do you need between each sprinkler if your planned variation in pressure from high to low is +/- 10%?
![Page 68: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Lateral SizeUse the friction factor equation to determine how much loss/100’ of pipe is allowable and choose lateral sizes accordingly:Ff = (Po)*(Pv)/Lc
Where:Ff is the maximum pipe friction factor (psi/100’),Po is the design operating pressure (psi),Pv is the allowable pressure variation (+/-, as decimal, psi), andLc is the critical length (distance to furthest sprinkler, ft)
![Page 69: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Lateral SizeNow, Po is 40psi, Pv is +/- 10% or 0.2 expressed as decimal, Lc is 20’+40’+40’+40’ = 140’, So, Ff = 40*0.2/140 = 0.057 psi or 0.05 psi
The first section of pipe has flow for all four nozzles, or 18gpm. The next section has three nozzles flow, or 13.5gpm, the last two sections have 9gpm and 4.5gpm, respectivelyStandard tables are available in many texts for pressure loss in pipes due to friction. Such a standard table is on the next page (from Rainbird website).
![Page 70: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
![Page 71: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Lateral Size
• So, if we are to keep friction factor at 0.05 psi/100’ or less, we need to begin with 3” PVC, and it needs to stay 3” after the first nozzle, but can reduce to 2” after the second nozzle. If a bit more variation is OK (eg. +/- 15%, or 0.086psi/100’), the lateral can reduce to 2-1/2” after the first nozzle, 2” after the second and 1-1/2” after the third.
![Page 72: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Example
You have determined that you will have to supply 2” of water every 10 days to meet a corn field water demand. You will use a lateral move system to apply the water in a 16-hr period every 10 days. The field in question is 20 acres (933 feet square). Assume an 80% sprinkler efficiency. How much water will you apply each irrigation and at what flow rate?
![Page 73: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Solution
2” every 10 days means volume is 2”/12 in/ft*933ft*933ft = 145081 ft3 or 1,085,200
gal
Prior to efficiency being considered, flow rate is 1,085,200gal/(16hr*60min/hr) or 1130 gpm
At 80% efficiency, 1085200/.8 gal need to be sprayed or 1,356,500gal for a flow rate of 1413 gpm
![Page 74: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Reference Recommendations
• ASABE Standards• Fangmeier et al. (2006) or Schwab et al.
(1993)• MWPS Sprinkler Irrigation Manual
![Page 75: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Questions on irrigation?
![Page 76: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Nutrient Management• One feeder pig produces 10.3 lbs of manure
per day. Assuming that manure has the same density as water, how much manure, in cubic feet, is most nearly produced annually from a 1000 head barn that has 3 sets (or turns) per year.
a) 40,000b) 70,000 c) 76,000d) 257,000
![Page 77: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Nutrient Management• One feeder pig produces 10.3 lbs of manure
per day. Assuming that manure has the same density as water, how much manure, in cubic feet, is most nearly produced annually from a 1000 head barn that has 3 sets (or turns) per year.
a) 40,000b) 60,000 c) 76,000d) 257,000
Answer B, 10.3/62.4*1000*365=60,248
![Page 78: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Nutrient Management/Facilities• The maximum loading rate (pounds of
volatile solids per 1000 cubic foot per day) for an anaerobic lagoon for animal waste in West Central Illinois is most nearly:
a) 2.0b) 3.0c) 4.0d) 5.0
![Page 79: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
Nutrient Management/Facilities
• The maximum loading rate for an anaerobic lagoon for animal waste in West Central Illinois is most nearly:
a) 2.0b) 3.0c) 4.0d) 5.0
C, 4.0, EP403.3
![Page 80: 2012 PE Review: S&W Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568165cb550346895dd8d785/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
Questions?