2012 annual meeting session 2a ncato

81
NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide NCSITE Conference November 15, 2012

Upload: francisco-ahumada-cortes

Post on 15-Jan-2016

11 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

session

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide

NCSITE ConferenceNovember 15, 2012

Page 2: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Alta Planning + DesignCreating active communities where bicycling and walking are safe, healthy, fun and normal daily activities

www.altaplanning.com

Page 3: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

“This is an extraordinary piece of work that’s long overdue. . .” Ray LaHood

Page 4: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

City DOTs

Washington D.C.

Atlanta

Austin

Baltimore

Boston

Chicago

Detroit

Houston

Los Angeles

Minneapolis

New York

Philadelphia

Phoenix

Portland

San Francisco

Seattle

Page 5: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

City DOTs

Arlington

Memphis

Page 6: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Project Review Team

• Six Professional Engineers

• Nine Certified Planners

• Dozens others representing

Public Works, City DOTs,

Traffic and Transportation,

Planning, Engineering

Page 7: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

International Design Team

Donald Meeker,Meeker & Associates

Peter Furth, Northeastern University

Arjen Jaarsma, Netherlands

Niels Jensen,City of Copenhagen

Lynn Weigand,IPBI

David Parisi,Parisi Associates

Page 8: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Why a NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide?

Page 9: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Why a NACTO Bikeway Design Guide?

“The purpose of the NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide (part of the Cities for Cycling initiative) is to provide cities with state‐of‐the‐practice solutions that can help create complete streets that are safe and enjoyable for bicyclists.”

“Developed by cities for cities, since unique urban streets require innovative solutions”

Expanding the toolkit

To compile treatments in use in the best cycling cities in the world

Dynamic document that captures quickly evolving field

Page 10: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Pre‐2011 Bikeway Design Guidance 

Page 11: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Post 2011 Bikeway Design Guidance

NACTO 1st Edition – 2011NACTO 2ND Edition ‐ 2012

AASHTO Update ‐ 2012

Page 12: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

NACTO: Accommodate “interested but concerned”

Based on surveys conducted in Portland, OR

Strong and fearless Enthused and confident

“No way, no how” Interested but concerned

Page 13: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Why a NACTO Bikeway Design Guide?

“Interested by concerned” people want to bike where they feel safe, often away from traffic

Portland, New York City, others – Increased bicycle traffic and safety on separated facilities and bike boulevards

Portland, OregonBicycle Boulevard Arterial with/bike lane

3,000 bicycles per day (avg) 450 Bicycles per day (avg)

8 crashes per year (avg) 82 crashes per year (avg)

Data from Roger Geller, City of Portland, Oregon

Page 14: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

What is the NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide?

Page 15: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

A Collection of 30 Innovative Bikeway Designs

BIKE LANES‐Conventional Bike Lanes‐Left‐side Bike Lanes‐Contra‐Flow Bike Lanes‐Buffered Bike Lanes

CYCLE TRACKS‐One‐way Protected Cycle Tracks‐Raised Cycle Tracks‐Two‐way Cycle Tracks

INTERSECTIONS‐Bike Boxes‐Intersection Crossing Markings‐Two‐stage Turn Queue Boxes‐Median Refuge Island‐Through Bike Lanes‐Combined Bike Lane‐Cycle Track Intersection Approach

SIGNALS‐Bicycle Signal Heads‐Signal Acuation and Detection‐Active Warning Beacon for Bike Route at Unsignalized Intersection‐Hybrid Signal for Bike Route Crossing of Major Street

SIGNING & MARKING‐Bike Route Wayfinding Signage and Markings System‐Colored Bike Facilities‐Shared Lane Markings 

Page 16: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

New Additions for 2012

BIKE LANES‐Conventional Bike Lanes‐Left‐side Bike Lanes‐Contra‐Flow Bike Lanes‐Buffered Bike Lanes

CYCLE TRACKS‐One‐way Protected Cycle Tracks‐Raised Cycle Tracks‐Two‐way Cycle Tracks

INTERSECTIONS‐Bike Boxes‐Intersection Crossing Markings‐Two‐stage Turn Queue Boxes‐Median Refuge Island‐Through Bike Lanes‐Combined Bike Lane‐Cycle Track Intersection Approach

SIGNALS‐Bicycle Signal Heads‐Signal Acuation and Detection‐Active Warning Beacon for Bike Route at Unsignalized Intersection‐Hybrid Signal for Bike Route Crossing of Major Street

SIGNING & MARKING‐Bike Route Wayfinding Signage and Markings System‐Colored Bike Facilities‐Shared Lane Markings 

SIGNING & MARKING

‐Colored Bike FacilitiesColored Pavement Material Guidance

BICYCLE BOULEVARDS‐Route Planning‐Signs and Pavement Markings‐Speed Management‐Volume Management‐Minor Street Crossings‐Major Street Crossings‐Offset Intersections‐Green Infrastructure

Treatment Subjects

Page 17: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO
Page 18: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

What is the NACTO Bikeway Design Guide?

Page 19: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

What is the NACTO Bikeway Design Guide?

Page 20: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

What is the NACTO Bikeway Design Guide?

Only two treatments in NACTO external to FHWA• Bike signals• Bike boxes

Cycle tracksAccording to FHWA…“Cycle tracks are “not a traffic control device”so no MUTCD restriction on its use”

On some elements FHWA says:“Can be implemented at present time if signs and pavement markings that are compliant with the MUTCD are used”

Page 21: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Features of NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide

Page 22: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Online Guide & Slideshows

Page 23: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Case Studies and Sample Drawings

Page 24: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Required, Recommended and Optional

Page 25: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Great Contextual Graphics, User‐Friendly

Page 26: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Features of NACTO Bikeway Design Guide

Cycle Tracks

Intersections

Bike boulevards

Page 27: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Cycle Tracks

One‐Way Protected Cycle Tracks

Raised Cycle Tracks

Two‐way Cycle Tracks

Page 28: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

One Way Protected Cycle Tracks – 2012 Edition

Page 29: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Credit: Bikeable Communities

• Decreases stress, increases comfort on high traffic streets

• Left‐side application with bus routes

• Parking lane as protection

• More attractive to bicyclists of all levels

ONE WAY PROTECTED CYCLE TRACK

One way cycle trackLong Beach, CA

Page 30: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Contextual Renderings

Page 31: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

RAISED CYCLE TRACK

Page 32: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

• Raised to sidewalk‐level or intermediate curb

• Capital Reconstruction Project

• Decrease Sidewalk riding

RAISED CYCLE TRACK

CAMBRIDGE, MA

Page 33: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

TWO‐WAY CYCLE TRACK

Page 34: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Two‐way Cycle TrackNEW YORK, NY

Page 35: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Recent NYC safety data…

Page 36: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

9th Avenue Cycle Track:• Injuries to all street users down 56%• Injuries to pedestrians down 29%• Injuries to cyclists down 57%• Sidewalk riding down 84%

Grand Street Cycle Track:• Injuries to all street users down 31%• Reportable crashes down 25%• Injuries to pedestrians down 21%• Sidewalk riding down 84%

Recent NYC Safety Data….

Page 37: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Features of NACTO Bikeway Design Guide

Cycle Tracks

• 104 cycle tracks on ground today in United States (doubled from 2011); 200 by end of 2013.

• American Journal for Public Health: Route Infrastructure and the Risk of Injuries to Bicyclists:  A Case‐Crossover Study – shows cycle track as safest (actual and perceived)o Protected bike lanes reduce the risk of cyclist injury 

by 90% compared to a street with parked cars and no bicycle facilities.

Teschke, K., et al. (2012). Route Infrastructure and the Risk of Injuries to Bicyclists: A Case‐Crossover 

Study. American Journal of Public Health 102(12): 2336‐2343.

Page 38: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Memphis, TN

Page 39: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Springdale, AR (part of Razorback Greenway USDOT TIGER grant)

Page 40: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Charlotte, NC3rd Street

Page 41: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

INTERSECTIONS

Page 42: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Intersections

Bike Boxes

Intersection Crossing Markings

Two‐Stage Turn Queue Boxes

Median Refuge Island

Through Bike Lanes

Combined Bike Lane/Turn Lane

Cycle TrackIntersection Approach

Page 43: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

CYCLE TRACK INTERSECTION APPROACH

Page 44: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Bike Boxes– 2012 Edition

Page 45: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Charlotte, NC

S. Blvd and Carson

Page 46: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Bike Boxes– 2012 Edition

• According to FHWA…“Currently is experimental; more research data is needed before a final decision can be made regarding this application”

Page 47: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

INTERSECTION CROSSING MARKINGS

Page 48: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

• Increases bicyclist visibility

• More predictable bicycle movements

• Reduces conflicts between motorists and bicyclists

INTERSECTION CROSSING MARKINGS

SEATTLE, WA

Page 49: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

VANCOUVER, BC

Page 50: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

BICYCLE BOULEVARDS

Page 51: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

BICYCLE BOULEVARDS – Not a New Idea!• Albuquerque, NM• Austin, TX (planned)• Arcata, CA (planned)• Berkeley, CA• Columbia, MO• Denver, CO (planned)• Emeryville, CA• Eugene, OR• Long Beach, CA• Madison,WI• Minneapolis, MN

• Nampa, ID• Ocean City, NJ• Palo Alto, CA• Pasadena, CA (planned)• Portland, OR• Salt Lake City, UT (planned)• San Luis Obispo, CA• Seattle, WA• Syracuse, NY (planned)• Tacoma, WA (planned)• Tucson, AZ• Wilmington, NC (1st one in NC)

Page 52: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

BICYCLE BOULEVARDS• Streets with low motorized 

traffic volumes and speeds, designated and designed to give bicycle travel priority

• Often parallel to major road• Better with connected, grid 

street network• Destinations at both ends and 

along way ideal• Treatments

– Signs– Pavement markings– Speed and volume management 

measures– Safe bicycle crossings of arterial 

streets

Ann Street, Wilmington, NC

Page 53: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Bicycle Boulevards – Signing and Marking

Page 54: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Bicycle Boulevards – Speed Management

Page 55: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Bicycle Boulevards – Volume Management

Page 56: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Bicycle Boulevards – Minor Intersections

Page 57: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Signals

Bicycle Signal Heads

Signal Detection and Actuation

Active Warning Beacon for Bike Route at UnsignalizedIntersection

Hybrid Signal for Bike Route Crossing of a Major Street

Page 58: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Colored Pavement Material Guidance

Page 59: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Using the Guide

Page 60: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Use the guide as a day-to-day resourceShare it with your colleagues

Page 61: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Integrate into Road Design Manuals

Page 62: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Reference the guide as part of your Complete Streets Policy

Page 63: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Complementary Uses

Page 64: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Thank You.

Matt Hayes, [email protected]

919‐484‐8448www.altaplanning.com

Page 65: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

EXTRAS

Page 66: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

• Increases visibility 

• Mitigates risk of right or left hook conflict

• Parking removal near intersection

• Transition to mixing zone or parallel to turn lane 

CYCLE TRACK INTERSECTION APPROACH

NEW YORK, NY

Page 67: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO
Page 68: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Two Stage Turn Queue Boxes – 2012 Edition

Page 69: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

• Facilitates safe left or right turn

• Typically used with cycle tracks

• Used  when merging is not an option or potentially dangerous

TWO‐STAGE TURN QUEUE

OTTAWA, CA

Page 70: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

• Prevents “Right Hook” collisions

• Gives bicyclists priority at signalized intersections

• Clears intersection of cyclists quickly

BIKE BOX

SAN FRANCISCO

Page 71: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Baltimore, MD

Page 72: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

SIGNALS

Page 73: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

BICYCLE SIGNAL HEADS

Page 74: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Long Beach, CA

Page 75: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

SIGNAL ACTUATION & DETECTION

Page 76: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

4 Types

• Loop

• Video

• Push‐Button

• Microwave

SIGNAL ACTUATION & DETECTION

Page 77: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

ACTIVE WARNING BEACON

Page 78: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

• User‐actuated amber flashing lights

• Actuated by detection or push button

• Hybrid Bicycle‐Pedestrian use

ACTIVE WARNING BEACON

BOULDER, CO

Page 79: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

HYBRID SIGNAL

Page 80: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

• More flexible than traditional signalized intersections for bicycle crossings

• Especially useful for bike boulevard crossings

Hybrid Signal

PORTLAND, OR

Page 81: 2012 Annual Meeting Session 2A NCATO

Through Bike Lane – 2012 Edition