2011 state of the local governance reportmalaybalaycity.gov.ph/files/fdp/draft final slgr for 2011...

1

LGPMS 2011 – City Government of Malaybalay

2011 STATE OF THE LOCAL GOVERNANCE REPORT

Message

Time fl ies, indeed. It seems l ike it was only yesterday when I stood before you to

deliver my first State of the City Address under my administration, I’ve been in office 20 months now and we are sti l l moving forward together for a strong Malayba lay City.

Our honored guest, Sen. Migz Zubiri, honorable members of the Sangguniang

Panglunsod headed by Vice Mayor Hon. Victor Aldeguer, al l punong barangays of the 46 barangays of the city, members of the barangay council, Sangguniang Kabataan, Barangay

Secretaries and Treasurers, all Department Heads, the Schools Division Superintendent and

other school officials, our other partners for the development of Malaybalay, friends, ladies and gentlemen, “Maayong Buntag” ug Happy 14th Charter Day Celebration “kanatong

tanan”.

Observing the Local Government Code mandate that the Local Chief Executive shall make an annual report to the people, I am bound to deliver this State of the City Address so

that you wil l know what the current situation of the entire city is. This address also presents the changes we have seen because of our strong commitment to make our city one of the

premiere developing areas in the country. Allow me to report some of these highlights. Our Health Programs

Our main health program is the maternal, child health and nutrition program. Infant and maternal deaths are still high. Data from our CHO shows that our efforts to improve the

output have improved but it is sti l l far from the levels set by the Millenium Development Goals. One of the interventions needed to address this is the establishment of more lying-in cl inics in the barangays. We shall be constructing a lying-in clinic in Brgy. San Martin and St.

Peter with a Php 3,000,000.00 grant from the DOH and allocate Php 1,000,000.00 for its equipment and facilities. Our nutrition program has been sustained because of continuous funding for feeding, micro-nutrient supplementation and deworming. Our program for tuberculosis has been very good; records show that our cure rate is high. Our rabies

program has also been very well sustained mainly because of the continuous supply of free vaccines from the DOH as well as funding to support the program. The dreaded dengue

disease did not cause us much problems last year. There were only 12 cases reported and 1 death as opposed to almost 326 cases and 5 deaths in 2010. Data from the CHO shows that the highest occurrence of death in our city was among the elderly, 70 years old and above caused by pneumonia followed by heart disease, then all forms of cancer and renal disease.

1st State of the City Address of City Mayor Ignacio W.

Zubiri delivered during the 14th Charter Day

Celebration on March 22, 2012

2



The city has partially addressed this problem by providing free pneumonia and influenza

vaccine to about 900 senior citizens. We are considering expanding the program to other senior citizens if financial capability will allow us. We are also negotiating with the DOH to provide us with the vaccines at half the price. Also, in the pursuit of wellness of our city employees as well as our people we continue to implement the HATAW program which is

on its 11th year as well as the recently implemented “Ehersisyong Pangkalahatan”program which is done every Friday at the City Covered Court.

Laboratory and Dental Services for our senior citizens continue to be free. Last year

we embarked on a free eye check-up program for our senior citizens in all the barangays and subsequently, free eyeglasses were given to them. A total of 2,436 senior citizens

benefitted from the program. The city also extends free blood chemistry to all our public school teachers.

Public Safety and Preparedness

The city continues to come up with measures to promote public safety and preparedness at all times. In 2010 vehicular accidents was one of the top causes of death. There were a total of 972 accidents reported. So we revisited our policies and improved our traffic management scheme to install preventive measures specifically at accident prone

areas. Our TMC is actively engaged in the apprehension of drivers of vehicles that are in violation of traffic laws and ordinances, especially motorcycle drivers that do not wear

helmets or are overloaded. With these programs in place, vehicular accidents decreased significantly. The instruction to our traffic management center is clear and concise; “MAKE OUR ROADS SAFER FOR COMMUTERS”.

Our MERU continues to render service to our people through efficient response to medical or vehicular emergencies. By next month we shall purchase two (2) brand-new

ambulances to ensure better service to our people. Our 117 is also a very important tool in our over-all peace and order efforts. We have upgraded our equipment so as to give better caller service. Also, we are now engaged in talks with the DILG to make our 117 the center for regional 117 services.

We are very grateful to the Almighty that in 2011, we were spared from Sendong

and other calamities. Although we experienced a flashflood in Sitio Panamucan in Brgy. San

Jose which partially or totally washed away 46 houses and dislocated 53 families, there were no casualties recorded. The City Government provided material and financial assistance to

the affected families which enabled them to purchase a property which is presently their resettlement site. With the realization that the possibil ity of landslides, floods and other forms of calamities are increasing, the City organized a rescue team in order to respond to these. The team had undergone trainings on first aid as well as water and mountain search

and rescue. We have purchased two (2) rescue vehicles and are in the process of purchasing the other equipment needed for them to efficiently respond to calamities in our

city. The trainings will continue so as to ensure that our rescue team shall always be in a high level of readiness. Our rescue team is being prepared not only for our use but to also assist our neighbors as well as the entire region even possibly the entire Mindanao. In the recent flood in Valencia City our rescue team was dispatched to assist them in search and

3



rescue and they did so efficiently. The team was also dispatched to Ca gayan de Oro City to

lend a hand to the victims of Sendong. As a good neighbor should, the city government donated 200 sacks of rice to the municipality of Baungon, 300 sacks of rice for Cagayan de Oro City and another 300 sacks of rice for Il igan City. We never allowed ourselves to be mere spectators of the said tragedy. We extended support in our own simple way.

Environment

One of our covenants with the people is to ensure a balanced ecology using a two-

pronged strategy, a) urban health and sanitation and b) rural greening. In compliance with R.A. 9003, we are in the process of updating our Solid Waste Management Plan. Initial

activities l ike the Waste Analysis and Characterization to generate important data were undertaken with the support of Central Mindanao University – College of Forestry and

Environmental Science. On the other hand, we saw to it that the City Ordinance No. 669 is strictly enforced.

Section 4 of that Ordinance states that any household, business or commercial establishments, institution and industrial and manufacturing plant that wil l be found or apprehended not complying with this ordinance shall be issued a Citation Ticket or Notice of Violation and shall be penalized with the corresponding fines. This law has to be enforced

regardless of who the violator is. Last year a total of 102 citation tickets were issued to violators.

We are planning to convert our controlled disposal facility into a categorized sanitary

landfil l in compliance to the directive from the National Solid Waste Management Commission. A team of experts wil l be coming to inspect our dumpsite and advise us on

how best to convert it. The “no segregation no collection policy” is enforced in the poblacion barangays and has been expanded to 11 more barangays. I commend our thirty-

eight (38) eco-waste technicians and drivers who dil igently collect the garbage in the poblacion and adjacent barangays. With waste segregation, we were able to collect recyclable materials which are being bought by the Malaybalay City Women’s Federation therefore providing additional income to households.

Last year, I mentioned about the bio-reactor composting facil ity that the city purchased. Because of this investment, we were able to produce 52,522 kilograms of organic ferti l izer which we distributed to the barangays for their communal gardens and

barangay nurseries. We also have a Vermi Composting Facil ity in the area. Our city ENRO personnel have also embarked on a beautification program for our dumpsite of which their

long term plan is to make it one of our eco-tourism sites. Our plastic densifier has processed recycled plastic, cellophane and Styrofoam into plastic garden blocks/pots.

In order to intensify our campaign for Rural Greening, the city established its own

tree nursery which produced over 100,000 assorted seedlings and distributed these to various barangays and organizations. We shall increase the production of seedlings so we

can expand the program to include barangays that have not yet benefitted from it.

Sloping Agricultural Land Technology or SALT technology is being reintroduced in the hilly and mountainous barangays with the aim of preventing rapid soil erosion as well as

4



decrease the possibility of landslides. One of our Environmental Programs implemented in

the city is the Upland Development Program of which our priority area for implementation is the BUHITA ancestral domain. Agriforestration is the main project being implemented there and Lumad farmers were organized for this purpose. To date a total of 37.5 hectares have been planted with 13,500 rubber seedlings and 38,700 coffee seedlings benefitting 150

lumad farmers and their families in 13 barangays.

In l ine with the greening program of the Aquino Administration we have conducted the Roadside Tree Planting Program with the Upper Pulangi barangays as pilot area. An 11.5 km. stretch of roads has been planted with coffee seedlings with 42 farmers as partners. A total of 15,440 seedlings were planted. In addition, there were 44 barangays which

participated in the Billion Trees Program of the national government and were able to plant 99,269 different tree species from June to November. Our City Linis Program is still in effect

and has provided employment to 730 residents. A total budget allocation of P2, 844, 645.20 is al located for this program.

Education The city government has been working closely with the DepEd for our educational programs. The city continues to invest in infrastructure such as the construction of

classrooms to meet the ever increasing demand for it. We are very thankful to the DepEd for providing 23 new classrooms to our city as well as providing for 50 new regular items.

To show our appreciation for their efforts I committed to also construct 23 classrooms and at present 10 classrooms have been bidded and are currently under construction and by April 2012 we shall bid out the construction of 12 more classrooms in time for the opening of school year 2012-2013. The provision of new regular items have enabled some our city

paid teachers to be regular teachers of the DepEd after serving our city faithfully for several years as job orders

Although we are making strides and positive accomplishments in other areas of the

education sector, our participation rate, cohort’s survival rate, achievement rate and NAT results are not so encouraging. In order to address these issues the city has partnered with

Ayala Foundation to find ways and means to reverse this trend. Education is sti l l a top priority of the City and we wil l continue to provide assistance to strengthen the quality of our educational system. The City is also a recipient of Php 2,200,000 grant from the Office

of the President through the Council of Early Childhood Care and Development for the establishment of a Day Care Laboratory at Barangay Bangcud. The building is currently

under construction. Social Services

Our administration is also concerned in uplifting the l iving conditions and improving

the quality of l ife of the underprivi leged, marginalized and the poor of our city.

Through the CSWDO, several livelihood activities and income generating programs were implemented for women, solo parents, out-of-school youth, families and persons with disabilities. We have also extended assistance in the form of donations of wheelchairs and prosthetic devices such as crutches, artificial legs and walkers to 27 disabled persons.

5



A total of P8, 164,200 pesos was also extended to 3,438 senior citizens aged 70 years old and above as financial assistance. Php 13,415,394 pesos was released in the form of Assistance to Individuals and Families in Crisis Situation and other forms of assistance

Agriculture and Economic Development

The economy of Malaybalay is anchored on agriculture. As such the city continues to implement programs aimed at enhancing the production of various agri products as well as providing subsidies for farm inputs. Last year we invested Php 3.5 mill ion pesos for our rice seed subsidy program and for the first time ever the city is also subsidizing ferti l izers.

The program provides 2 sacks of ferti l izer for every sack of rice seed. Our rice production for irrigated and rain-fed areas in 25 rice producing barangays posted an increase of 55,796

MT with an average yield of 4.46 MT per hectare. There is a significant increase from last year’s yield which was 4.14 MT. Our corn production area in 2011 decreased due to conversion to other crops. But we are happy to report that corn production on a per hectare

basis has increased as compared to 2010. The City Government has also introduced a new program that wil l contribute to increased yields for rice farmers, this is our desiltation program. In order to increase the

flow of water to the rice paddies we purchased a backhoe in order to excavate irrigation canals that are already heavily si lted. To date we have desilted more or less 16 kms of

communal irrigation canals and about 5 ki lometers of the North Main Canal.

During the off-farm season, farmer cooperators generate additional income from the Rice – Duck Techno Demo Program that is spearheaded and funded by the Phil ippine

Agrarian Reform Fund for National Development (PARFUND). 203 of our farmers have enrolled in our Tilapia Culture and Giant Freshwater Shrimp program.

In support to the Nutrition Program of the city, the City Agriculture Office distributed

vegetable seeds for the barangay communal gardens and also to schools for the Gulayan sa Paaralan Program.

In order to attain the city government programs on food security and self-sufficiency, we have accelerated our efforts in the development of Irrigation Facil ities. In partnership

with the National Irrigation Administration we rehabilitated 4 communal Irrigation Facil ities in Si lae, Linabo, Busdi and Sinanglanan. With the partnership we also rehabil itated 6

Communal Irrigation Projects under the Balikatang Sagip Patubig Program. And after 2 years of project preparation we have finally bidded out the Small Water Impounding Project for Barangay Managok which has a project cost of Php 43 mill ion. We were able to access funds from Mindanao North Coast Integrated Agricultural Development Project (MINCIADP)

for infrastructure projects and post harvest facilities which includes water pumps, sprinklers and drip irrigation. Ten barangays benefited from this project. The City has also funded the

purchase of farm machineries such as a rice mill and corn mill including the construction of 20 Multi-Purpose Drying Pavements (MPDP). This year we are allocating funds for the construction of 20 more MPDP’s and diversion dams and irrigation canals in partnership with National Irrigation Administration on a cost sharing scheme.

6



Our Agriculture Department has conducted soil analysis in all our barangays and as a

result we have now what is called a soil ferti lity map. This ferti lity map will serve as a guide for our farmers on what crops are suitable for cultivation in their areas because it wil l include information such as soil texture, water holding capacity and chemical composition.

Our Plant Tissue Laboratory enables us to mass produce plantlets of abaca, banana, strawberry and other crops. We no longer have to purchase seedlings from other places

and we save in purchase and transport costs. Peace and Order

In 2010, the PNP reported 1,639 crime incidents. For 2011, our records show that our crime incidents went down significantly to 32% or 522 incidents only compared to 2010.

Our local police was able to keep the citizens of Malaybalay City generally safe from lawless elements in spite of the lack of personnel. Our City is generally safe and we are relentless in our efforts to combat crime.

We wil l continue to support our local police to enhance their professionalism and provide them with equipment and facil ities to effectively perform their responsibil ities. We have purchased two (2) units of Mitsubishi Four Wheel Drive vehicles amounting to Php 1.3

million in order to increase the mobil ity of our policemen and to enable them to respond to calls in the hinterlands. We have also purchased twenty units of handheld radios and five

new computers for the PNP. In the next few weeks our PNP wil l already move to our new city police station located at Magsaysay Street. The construction of this building was jointly funded by the PNP and the City Government.

Infrastructure

The city had implemented various infrastructure projects worth a little over Php 100 million 70 of these projects have been completed while 24 are on-going. We have already implemented phase 1 & 2 of the concreting of the Violeta to Apo Macote road and wil l be implementing the 3rd Phase by the middle of this year we allocate more or less Php

20million for each phase of the construction. We shall al so be implementing within this year the concreting of 3 ki lometers of the Bangcud to Sto. Nino road with a bu dget of Php 60 mill ion.

Revenue Generation

Our city realized a total local income of Php 92,307,407.67 compared to Php 83 million in 2010 which is again another record for our city. This was made possible by the aggressive campaign of our City Treasurers Office in tax collection. Of this our economic

enterprise has contributed Php 14,120,230.00. It is forecasted that our total income for fiscal year 2012 wil l reach Php 100 mill ion.

Yes ladies and gentlemen our city is indeed standing on solid ground. It has

continued to grow exponentially simply because of the visions and aspirations of our citizens to become a premier city in Mindanao. As Malaybalay turns 14 today we are also faced with

7



more challenges but I am confident that we shall overcome these. Our strong local

government coupled with a pro-active Sanggunian and hardworking employees wil l once again carry our beloved city to even greater heights. May the Almighty Father continue to shower us with His richest blessings. Daghang salamat ug malipayong pagsaulog sa ika -katorse na kasumaran sa pagkasiyudad sa Malaybalay. ONE FOR MALAYBALAY. USWAG

MALAYBALAY!

8



Part 1: State of Performance

Performance Area: Administrative Governance

The Administrative Governance is composed of 6 service areas: (1) Local Legislation;

(2) Development Planning; (3) Revenue Generation; (4) Resource Allocation and Util ization;

(5) Customer Service and (6) Human Resource and Management and Development.

Local Legislation The Sangguniang Panlungsod of LGU Malaybalay held its weekly regular session.

They conducted research and public hearings to entities and individuals before the passage

of resolutions, ordinances and implementation of the programs and projects.

The Sanggunian has enacted 28 General and Appropriation Ordinances and adopted

50 legislative measures of various natures such as giving authority to the city mayor to enter

into and sign contracts and agreement, accreditation of Non-Government Organizations,

providing for a Comprehensive Children and Family Support System, simple subdivision

approval and many others.

Public documents were posted in places accessible to the public. Ordinances were codified and published in local newspaper. Minutes of the session were also properly kept.

Development Planning

In terms of development planning, the City Development Council regularly meets to

discuss/evaluate/formulate/approve developmental programs, projects and activities (PPAs).

The Executive Committee of the CDC is also organized and held meetings to discuss

matters that need immediate action in times where the full council cannot convene.

The LGU implemented the Malaybalay Integrated Survey Systems (MISS) and Geographical Information Systems (GIS). Both systems are helpful in monitoring projects and updating the database of the city it is an innovative tool in gathering quantitative and qualitative data in the barangays which are uti l ized in formulating various development

plans.

The LGU acquired high resolution satell ite image for the following objectives: ecological profi l ing and delivery of social services; business mapping; validation of the

remaining forests for environmental protection; revenue generation; disaster management and preparedness plan. The images were already deployed in the selected department

specially those who processed data for their proper uti l ization. For spatial analysis, the digitizing of the satellite image is sti l l on-going using ArcGIS Software for image extraction and conversion. The GIS staffs were trained by Geodata System Incorporated as part of the package of acquiring the satell ite image.

9



Revenue Generation

In determining the efficiency of financial system, the LGU of Malaybalay initiated a

system that could inter-link offices such as City Assessor, City Treasurer, City Accounting and

Business Licensing Office through the Integrated Revenue Generation System (IRGS),

Business Permit Licensing System (BPLS) and Real Property Tax Assessment System (RPTAS).

An Internal Control system was also adopted to control the appropriations and obligations

of al l offices through Obligation Receipt, processed Vouchers and Purchase Request.

The LGU regularly conducted thru the City Treasurer’s Office the tax information

drive to different barangays thru recorreda, radio announcements and local newspaper before the scheduled collection. The city also established incentive scheme to promote efficiency in real property assessment and real property tax collection by way of giving discounts to advance payments and on-time payments. The streamlining of Business One

Stop Shop (BOSS) is further improved thru the inclusion of the City Environment and Natural Resources Office (CENRO) and the City Assessor’s Office (CASSO) on the business permit

processing. The Composite Advance Inspection (CAI) of al l business establishments has been enhanced with the use of new computer devices and barcode stickers and readers. This means that business establishments already assigned unique barcodes which can be used as reference for their record in the advance inspection database. The new business

permit application form was further improved by unifying all the data needed by the different offices involved in the issuance of business permit as prescribed by the Phil ippine Business Registry (PBR). It means that the city’s new form is now ready to l ink the PBR

database wherein all the business establishments of the country can be accessed thru the website. This will help inform and educate business operators regarding the standards and

the requirements needed for the continuation of their operation. The new computer system (IRGS-BPLS) is now almost complete and it will replace the computer system that the city is now using. The new will link to different offices involved in

business licensing such as the database of City Assessor’ Office, City Treasurer’s Office and the City Mayor’s Office.

The Business One Stop Shop aims to provide transparency, accountabil ity, response

to the needs of al l Business permit applicants as well as to institutionalize administrative mechanism to address red tape complaints.

As shown, the collection in 2011 increased as a result of the intensified advance inspection of al l business establishments.

10



0.00

5,000,000.00

10,000,000.00

15,000,000.00

20,000,000.00

Business Tax

2010 2011

0.00

500,000.00

1,000,000.00

1,500,000.00

2,000,000.00

2,500,000.00

Permit Tax

Permit Tax

2010 2011

Comparative data collection CY 2010 - 2011

Nature 2010 2011 Increase Increase in %

Business Tax 15,673,481.32 19,742,783.40 4,069,302.08 25.96%

Permit Tax 1,737,500.00 2,141,287.94 403,787.94 23.23%

Total 17,410,981.32 21,884,071.34 4,473,090.02 25.69%

11



Resource Allocation and Utilization The graph below shows the comparative data on appropriation of General Fund from

2009 to 2011.

Comparative data on Appropriation – General Fund, CY 2009,2010,2011

Genera l Fund 2009

Actua l 2010

Actua l 2011

Actua l

Personal Services 130,643,500.59 199,394,927.00 221,469,789.00

Ma int. & Other Operating Expenses 109,222,766.66 107,013,152.00 102,899,218.00

Ca pital Outlay 1680,320.00 14,191,000.00 160,000.00

Lump-sum Appropriation 6,022,272.99 10,727,040.00 8,894,757.72

Debt Servicing 4,038,587.23 - -

Special Provision Allocation 290,919,736.06 223,558,627.21 91,446,035.28

Sta tutory & Contractual Obligations 87,883,593.81 170,557,144.27 110,046,000.00

Budgetary Reserve 42,391,381.59 83,118,302.00 61,474,000.00

Tota l 665,690,513.08 808,560,192.48 596,389,800.00

0.00

50,000,000.00

100,000,000.00

150,000,000.00

200,000,000.00

250,000,000.00

300,000,000.00

350,000,000.00

General Fund

2009Actual

2010Actual

2011Actual

Comment [a1]: Get actual data from Achie..

12



Customer Service

The City Government of Malaybalay also implements strategic approach to address

the unregistered birth, death and marriage within the city thru the Barangay Civil

Registration System (BCRS) which covers the forty six (46) barangays. Contributory to the

success of the program is thru the Barangay Secretaries and Health Workers who were

trained as Enumerators and Encoders.

On Real Property Documents, with the help of the embedded Real Property Tax

Assessment System (RPTAS) the processing of real property documents can easily be

generated with the real time. The procedure in securing real property documents is made

known thru posters and flyers. The procedure is clear with turn-around time posted

outside the office.

Human Resource Management Office has been created by the LGU to complement

the quality services and competitiveness needed by the cl ients. In fact, al l the recruitment

and selection processes and results either plantilla or non-plantil la are all posted publicly.

This office is responsible in coordinating and monitoring the implementation of the

Biometrics System in which the employees of the City Government were successfully

assisted and enrolled in the system. This was designed by the in-house programmers of the

city. This system accurately calculates the time recording of every employee and detects

tardiness and under-times by the office.

In the past year, office also facilitated the approval of the Civil Service Commission

Region X the following revised policies on Personnel Mechanisms these are the Performance

Evaluation System (PES), Grievance Machinery (GM), Merit Selection Plan (MSP), Program

on Awards and Incentives for Service Excellence and the Administrative Disciplinary Rules

on Sexual Harassment Cases.

13



Result of Data Capture Form

(Administrative Governance, 2011)

Area(s) with Excellent Performance

Your LGU is doing an excellent performance in 1 out of 4 sub-areas of Administrative

Governance. Sustain Performance in this area:

Area(s) with Excellent Performance Interpretation

Human Resource Management and

Development

Managing the human resource is geared towards

a desired end which is "desirable organizational

performance and productivity".

14



Area(s) for Improvement

The areas for improvement are l isted by priority, starting from the area which gets the lowest performance scale followed by areas which get higher performance scales, respectively.

Priority Area for

Improvement

Performance

Description Interpretation

Local Legislation 3.92

Fair

The imperatives of quality legislation have to be

looked into. This might mean looking into

legislative staff competence and the greater use

of legislative tools such agenda development,

legislative tracking, backstopping committee and

legislative performance.

Customer Service -

Civi l Applications

4.75

High but not

Excellent

The civi l application system needs to be

transformed into a seamless transactional

process. After all , the inherent motivation of

putting up such a system is to ensure the ease of

obtaining civi l registry and real property

documents.

Development

Planning

4.92

High but not

Excellent

Improvements in the following areas are

underscored: (a) organizational performance; (b)

consultation process; and (c) management of

planning database. These areas are instrumental

in quality land use and development planning, or

lack of it.

15



Performance Area: Social Services

Social Governance looks into four areas: Health Services, Support to Education Services, Support to Housing and Basic Util ities, and Peace, Security and Disaster Risk

Management. Your LGU performance in each area of Social Governance is plotted in the graph below.

Health Services The functionality of the Local Health Board of the City of Malaybalay is based on Sec.

98 of LG Code of 1991. These health services include quality Primary Health Care, Maternal Care, Child Care and other innovative health services.

The Local Health Board has its organized agenda for every meeting and all meetings are documented even if they only meet occasionally.

For the primary health care, the basic medical supplies and equipments are complete and functional. In fact, basic medicines are always available even the health referral system is already established. All the facilities are clean and the availabil ity of the

physicians or medical staffs regularly stationed as scheduled.

Midwives attended Capacity Enhancement Program Training on Maternal &

Newborn Care to help eliminate maternal & newborn mortality. After completion of

practical procedures in the hospital, certificate of proficiency was given to MDG midwives.

The City Hea lth Office conducted maternal death review with the theme, “No woman

should die giving l ife.” There are five cases of maternal deaths were reviewed, these were

from Barangay Miglamin, San Jose and Casisang. Barangay Captain of each barangay

together with their Kagawad on Health and Midwife were present during the review. This

was conducted by different doctors and expertise in the locality, they shared about their

knowledge regarding with the maternal and child health.

In promoting the healthy lifestyle and awareness of having a healthy body, the City

Government of Malaybaly leads “Hataw Exercise” every Friday at 3 pm. It’s start with a

jogging from the city hall ground to Barangay 4 Covered court. Then to follow the simple

dance move exercise that last about 45 minutes to one hour.

At present, there are 73 Barangay Nutrition Scholars registered in the City. Every 1 st

quarter of the year, they conducted the operation “Timbang”. Through this, the City

Nutrition Committee recorded from children ages 0-71 months old showed a yearly

decrease in the prevalence rate of undernourished children. In 2010 it was 5.37% and 5.34%

in 2011. Continuous IEC and distribution of feeding goods and micronutrient supplements

in every barangay was done in order to rehabil itate malnourished children.

Six teams were organized with members from the City Nutrition Committee that

made-up the 2011 City Evaluation Team. They evaluated and assess the programs and

16



accomplishments of the 46 barangays. The outstanding nutrition barangay performers were

given a green banner award and cash awards. Non-government organizations like Bukidnon

Tribal Foundation, Inc. and Julie’s Bakeshop were also given plaque of recognition for their

continued support on the nutrition program in the city.

Barangay Chairman, newly appointed Botika ng Barangay Operators, selected City

Health Office staff attended the Botika ng Barangay Training last July 2011 at Mama Lo’s

Kusina. About 36 participants were l istened to the concept and importance of having a

Botika sa Barangay. Besides, the city has already 28 Botika ng Barangay located in different

barangays.

Support to Education Services

For the Local School Board, a scholarship program its functionality is based on

Section 98 of the LG Code of 1991 or Section 94 of the LG Code of ARMM. The City

Government of Malaybalay implemented a scholarship program to assist the less fortunate

students specially those poor but deserving. Aside from the basic education program of the

Dep-Ed, the Community Learning Center was established. This is a special project on

Alternative Learning System (ALS) which won the much coveted project on the national.

The Schools Division is taking its responsibility seriously to provide accessible quality education to all its cl ientele. Government thrusts are integrated in the curriculum for the

holistic development of learners and enhancement of their potentials in order to become useful citizens in the country as a whole. The Division of Malaybalay City has continued its effort in providing quality education to the people in the City of Malaybalay in spite of its l imited resources being a new division. The division envisions providing excellent

educational services that develop globally competitive learners equipped with lifelong skills. Learners who are ecologically and culturally-sensitive, God-loving and value oriented

individuals. The City Government of Malaybalay extends their support to elementary and

secondary education from the Special Education Fund. The fund is use for the repair and maintenance of school buildings, facilities and equipments. The city also provides l iteracy mapping, Advocacy Social Mobilization, books and periodicals. Also part of the program is the hiring of Job Order teachers in the extension classes.

For the Alternative Learning System, it focuses on the functional l iteracy and skil ls

training to target beneficiaries such as promoting gender sensitivity, equality and development. This program is for the less fortunate individuals that cannot afford to go regular schools. Practical skills gained from the system are known to be applied by many of the beneficiaries like massage, refloxogy, dressmaking, basic computer operation and even

l ivelihood program such as hog raising, goat raising and the l ike. Housing and Basic Utilities

With the City Housing Board, a number of nearby barangays were identified for housing and settlement looks into socialized housing program of the city. The LGU have an

17



updated inventory on informal settlers, makeshift houses and the sites for potential

housing. Majority of the barangays have accessed to potable water supply which is provided by the City Water District and electricity supplied by the Bukidnon Electric Cooperative.

Peace, Security and Disaster

The Local Peace and Order Council shall compose of the LGU counterparts of the departments, offices and agencies. The City Government of Malaybalay keeping great strides to make peaceful in its Peace and Order Council, City Disaster Coordinating Council and City Council for the Welfare of Children. The Integrated Area Community Public Safety

Plan which contains measure that aimed at improving peace and order and public safety in the LGU. This plan is updated every 1st quarter of the calendar year.

The PNP station in Malaybalay has coordinated with the 4003rd Brigade and the 29th IB of Philippine Army. Continuous combat operations and regular patrolling were conducted

at the areas where the presence of the enemy. Checkpoints are regularly conducted in strategic areas to prevent the enemy’s recovery in their lost mass base.

The City Peace and Order Council conducted four (4) regular meetings where plans

and programs on maintenance of peace and order situation of the city were tackled. Tanod

Professionalization Training Seminar had undergone proficiency development which aims to

perform their commitment as peace and public safety officers with a high sense of integrity

and responsibil ity.

Disaster Risk Management

The Local Disaster Coordinating Council (LDCC) organized based on the composition

in accordance with Presidential Decree No. 1568, s. of 1978. The City Disaster Risk

Reduction and Management office had undergone disaster preparedness seminars. This

seminar aims to enhance skil ls in rescue operation. Availabil ity of evacuation center are

strategically identified and stock piling of basic necessities such as food, medical supplies,

blankets, etc. or at the minimum access to such relief goods is immediate, and distribution

scheme effectively reach out to disaster-affected groups. The suggested operational

community-based early warning device is thru the use of mobile phones and church bell.

Disaster relief operation is conducted to immediately provide basic commodities to

individuals and families who are victims of natural and man-made calamities. Emergency

shelter assistance is also provided for those who lost their homes.

18




(Social Governance, 2011)


None of the 4 areas in Social Governance marked "excellent performance" so far. Meantime, dedicate more time and effort on the areas for improvement.

19




The areas for improvement are l isted by priority, starting from the area which gets the lowest performance scale followed by areas which get higher performance scales, respectively.

Priority Area for Improvement

Performance Description

Interpretation

Support to Housing

and Basic Utilities

4.00 High but not

Excellent

A certain level of support is extended to the housing services sector. However, further assistance to concerns such as the following is encouraged.

Suggested Action(s) to Take:

Cause the donation of a local government lot for socialized housing, or provide

socialized housing or mass dwelling in partnership with the private sector. Housing is

an inalienable right



Interpretation

Peace, Security and

Disaster Risk Management

4.54

High but not Excellent

Efforts are made to ensure Peace, Security and Disaster Risk Management. But much more need to be done. Factors that have the ability to improve

performance in this area have to be considered.


Ensure an annual financial allocation to the Katarungang Pambarangay. The Local Government Code mandates it. Let us be reminded that this village justice system is

principal in the promotion of community peace, harmony and solidarity.

Enhance local government readiness to manage the risks of disasters, including

relief, other associated services and rehabilitation



Interpretation

Support to Education

Services

4.80 High but not

Excellent

A certain level of support to basic education is extended. However, further assistance to matters such as the following is encouraged. The Local School Board

might have to do more to advance the cause of those in need of quality education.


Mobilize the Local School Board

20





Interpretation

Health Services 4.84

High but not

Excellent

The overall quality of the local health system deserves a second look. This is so because performance falls short in certain aspects. The principal support system

on this matter is the Local Health Board. It might have to do more.


Mobilize the Local Health Board

21



Performance Area: Economic Governance

Economic Governance looks into three areas: Support to Agriculture Sector, Support to Fishery Services, and Enterprise, Business and Industry Promotion. The report varies

according to the nature of economic activities in the locality. Support to agriculture or fishery services are fi ltered out if not applicable. Your LGU performance in this area is

plotted in the graph below. Support to Agriculture

The City Agriculture Office rates high on the infrastructure support:

For rehabilitation of irrigation system for irrigated or irrigable areas, it is closely

coordinated with the Department of Agriculture (DA) through the NIA to implement an irrigation project which is funded out under Mindanao Rural Development Program (MRPD)

and Balikatang Sagip Patubig Program (BSPP). The diversion dam projects were proposed for construction starting this year 2012 onward to barangay that has potential irrigable areas. The Irrigation Development Program is in l ine with the program of the LGU of

Malaybalay to have a permanent and functional irrigation system for efficient services in supplying irrigation water needs of farmers; the program is to increase cropping intensity

and productivity of rice that wil l lead to uplift the economic and social condition of the farmers thereby increasing the income of farming families. In the provision of post-harvest equipment, threshers, harvesters, driers mill ing

machines, storage and like. LGU of Malaybalay extends post harvest facilities like Mindanao Rural Development Program (MRPD) and rice mill of farm machineries to legitimate farmers’

organization. Assisted farmers improve their capabil ity and competitiveness in processing and marketing of their farm produce. Since the City of Malaybalay is fortunate again to be one of the recipients of the DA’s

Mindanao North Coast Integrated Agricultural Development Project (MNCIADP). One of the highlights of the project is food security and self-sufficiency in which to ensure reduction of

poverty incidences within Northern Mindanao. The project involved the infrastructure

projects and post-harvest facilities assistance and that the farmers, fisher folks and other stakeholders alike are expected to benefit sustainable means to reap profit that would in

turn, translate to better sources of income and an improved standard of l iving in the city. Moreover, this project envisioned to greatly pave way for a more efficient means of drying agricultural commodities and shall provide an easy l ike for farmers, fisher folks and other agricultural key players to generate more potential farm investors and aide from other

groups. In addition, the project shall allow farmers to avail minimal transportation cost of goods from production areas to accessible markets.

22



LGU Agricultural Extension and on-site research and production services:

Under credit facilitation services, the government organizations l ike the Department

of Agriculture (DA); the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR); the Bureau of Post Research and Equipment (BPRE); the Bureau of Soils and Water Management (BSWM)

and the National Irrigators Association (NIA), these agencies support financially in all undertakings in Agricultures in cost-sharing basis. KAANIB and PARfund and NGOs also

extend their support in agriculture. LGU Malaybalay also extends support on production services l ike seeds subsidy, ferti lizer (21-0-0) subsidy to farmers at 50% sharing scheme and existing functional soil and tissue laboratories that could test the chemical and physical texture of soil .

Research Development and Market Development services:

Two (2) sites of techno demo were established this year. These are located in

Barangays Busdi and Managok Malaybalay City. Busdi techno demo was harvested last July

13, 2011 while Managok wil l be harvested on March 2012. For the market development services the LGU Malaybalay highly supports to show case of products produced locally such as the tissue culture and plantlet and disease free planting materials l ike banana, abaca, strawberry and chrysanthemum even promote market of different l inkages of different

products. The Bio-N techno demo was established at the back of the City Agriculture Office near the Bio-N Mixing Plant building. Two crops planted in the sites which are the corn and

peanuts. Other alternative and innovative assistance to farmers namely: Organic Farming,

Vermi-cast production, integrated pest management, provision of organic ferti l izer, Bio-N

and Bio-Corn to reduce usage of inorganic ferti lizer and production of biological agents to control pest incidents.

Entrepreneur & Business Industry Promotion

The LGU of Malaybalay promotes a business friendly environment; it determined the quality the civil application system such as the Streamlined and more improved Business One Stop Shop (BOSS); Information Drive thru the tri -media (recoreda, radio plug and local newspaper); the composite team of the city government tasked to inspect establishments

and issues Advance Inspection Card which eventually the basis of business permit renewal; unified form of Business Permit Application wherein all involved offices are fall into one area

and the on-going construction of the New Integrated Revenue Generation system – Business Permits and Licensing System (IRGS-BPLS) Module which is now almost complete. This systems is much parallel on the current system that the city is now using and it is further

improve by our in house programmers of the city.

23




(Economic Governance, 2011)


None of the 2 areas in Economic Governance marked "excellent performance" so far. Meantime, dedicate more time and effort on the areas for improvement.

24




The areas for improvement are l isted by priority, starting from the area which gets

the lowest performance scale followed by areas which get higher performance scales, respectively.



Interpretation

Entrepreneurship, Business and Industry

Promotion

4.17 High but not

Excellent

More need to be done to institutionalize a business-friendly environment. Factors such as the following need to be looked into:


Ensure the ease of doing business. Strategize to effect the issuance of building,

occupancy, and business permits in a more expedient manner



Interpretation

Support to Agriculture Sector

4.67 High but not

Excellent

Local government support is extended to the Agriculture Sector. But greater intervention is

necessary.


Improve infrastructure support, e.g., communal irrigation system, farm-to-market

roads, post-harvest facilities Improve credit facilitation services to farmers

Extend adequate production support, e.g., planting materials, fertilizers, and

laboratory services such as soil testing

Provide assistance to research and development, e.g., techno-demo cooperators, and research institutes

Improve market development services, e.g., trade fairs, exhibits, missions and

congresses

25



Performance Area: Environmental Governance

Environmental Governance looks into four areas: Forest Ecosystem Management,

Freshwater Ecosystem Management, Coastal Marine Ecosystem Management, and Urban Ecosystem Management. The report varies according to local ecosystems. Ecosystems which

are not related to the LGU are fi ltered out.

The Forest Management Program, freshwater protection or rehabil itation program,

pollution control program are all integrated in the Comprehensive Development Plan and the Provincial Development Physical Framework Plan wherein NGOs, People’s Organization, private sector or the general public involved in the protection and management of forest, rehabilitation of freshwater, rivers or lake and the environment from air or water pollution

ecosystem.

The City Environment Natural Resources Office, the newly created office which is tasked to develop and implement programs and projects to ensure the protection, management and sustainable development of the environment and natural resources of the city. The office divided into two divisions namely Environmental Management Division and

Watershed Management Division.

Freshwater Ecosystems Management

The City government of Malaybalay gave its full support to the “Adopt an Estero

Project” of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) which was launched last March 22,2011 in celebration of World Water Day. This was started in the National Capital Region in the year 2010. It is now promoted to become a nationwide endeavor aimed to reduce the outbreak of waterborne disease and to reduce the risks and

hazards brought by flash floods.

The City ENRO took part in the consultation and planning process together with other partners from the academe, NGOs, Pos, and NGAs.

Two main creeks in Malaybalay City were chosen for the project, the Kalawaig and

Caul-Mansikol Creeks. A clean-up activity was held for these two creeks last April 29, 2011 as an opening salvo. Fifty personnel from the City ENRO for the collection of the gathered

solid waste placed from the designated collection points.

Urban Ecosystems and Solid Waste Management

ESWM Ordinance # 669 is now fully enforced in the fourteen ba rangays with the

issuance of citation tickets/notice of violations for non-compliant solid waste sources. As of December 31, 2011, a total of 102 citation tickets were issued to different solid waste

sources for violating any provision of the City Ordinance which were classified as residential, commercial, institutional and garbage collectors. Common violation of violators was the

non-segregation of their solid waste.

26



For the segregation collection, the City ENRO has 38 eco-waste technicians and

drivers who collect the garbage from the 11 Poblacion Barangays and 10 adjacent barangays. All of the Eco-waste technicians have undergone trainings in order to effectively implement the “No Collection – No Segregation Policy”. They were provided with uniform and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to protect them from the hazard brought about by

the nature of their job.

Rehabilitation of the City Controlled Disposal Facil ity continues which includes tree planting activities on the perimeter of the CDF and the landscaping of the surroundings. The Bio Reactor Composting Facility was able to produce a total of 52,522 kilograms of organic ferti l izers from January 2011 until November 2011. Organic Ferti lizer was distributed to the

barangay for their barangay garden and barangay nursery. The operation of the Plastic Densifier was not totally maximized due to supply problem on one of the major components

of the recycling process that is the used of oil. With this limitation, however, we sti ll able to process recycled plastic blocks/pots four times in the year 2011. The whole operation of the City Controlled Disposal Facil ity and other best ESWM practices in general gained due

recognition not only in the City of Malaybalay but also throughout the entire Region X and the neighboring provinces. Various LGUs visited Malaybalay City to observe our ESWM implementation strategy and programs.

Another environmental management services offered by the City ENRO is the provision of technical assistance to the barangays especia lly with regards to their

compliances to the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000 (RA 9003). Regular coordination with the barangay council, purok officials and the members of the Solid Waste Management Committee was also undertaken to immediately address issues relating to solid waste disposal/collection, MRF establishment, composting facil ity establishment,

formulation of ESWM ordinances/policies and information/education dissemination. Preparatory meetings with the Barangay Council were conducted in the 11 barangays which

were added to our garbage collection services for the year 2011.

27




(Environmental Governance, 2011)


Your LGU is doing an excellent performance in 2 out of 3 sub-areas of Environmental Governance. Sustain Performance in this area:

Area(s) with Excellent

Performance Interpretation

Forest Ecosystems

Management

Forest ecosystem management is central to the concerns

of the LGU. Long-term planning is paramount. CSOs and

citizens are mobilized in forest protection. Areas for

reforestation and protection are set, and that target areas

for reforestation and protection are met.

28



Area(s) with Excellent

Performance Interpretation

Freshwater Ecosystems

Management

Freshwater ecosystem management is of importance to

the LGU. Long-term planning is valued. CSO and citizen

participation are recognized and are mobilized in fresh

water protection and rehabilitation. Areas for

rehabilitation and protection are set, and that target areas

for rehabilitation and protection are met.


The areas for improvement are l isted by priority, starting from the area which gets the lowest performance scale followed by areas which get higher performance scales,

respectively.

Priority Area for

Improvement

Performance


Urban Ecosystems

Management

4.23

High but not

Excellent

Pollution control and proper solid waste

management are essential in preserving

the integrity of the environment. More

need to be done. To gain better

performance in this area, consider the

following:

Suggested Action(s) to Take

Strengthen the Solid Waste Management Board

Prepare, if none has been formulated, or improve the quality of, the Solid Waste

Management Plan

Ensure that every barangay has a material recovery facil ity

Improve solid waste collection practices

Move from Open Dumpsite Facil ity to Controlled Dumpsite Facil ity to a Sanitary

Landfill as the final disposal facil ity. It makes sense. At the very least, inaction has

legal implications. But more tell ing are the health and environmental imperatives

29



Performance Area: Valuing Governance

This section of the report describes how your LGU values and maintains good

governance in the context of Transparency, Participation, and Financial Accountabil ity. Participation

The City Development Program (CDP), City Land Used Plan (CLUP), Local

Development Council (LDC), Local Health Board (LHB), Local School Board (LSB) and Peace and Order Council are the programs initiated by the city government. The plans and programs of the city government were implemented with the active and extent participation of the NGOs, People’s Organization and/or Private Sectors.

The city government also posted feedback mechanism to generate citizen’s views for

the benefit of the public and reach out quality service. It is strategically installed or placed the suggestion box right in front of the entrance of the city hall at the information area.

Transparency

The City Public Information Desk immediately provides action such as referrals, or basic information response to requests or inquiries of LGU clients. The Information Desk is

situated right in front of the entrance gate of the city hall . The LGU come-up with the formulation of the Citizen’s Charter Manual which describes the procedure of the different

services of the city government. Website, fl iers, brochures and radio broadcasting are some of the specified medium that the city provides the public.

Financial Accountabil ity

The Financial Management System of the LGU was effectively done thru the following criteria:

Under R.A 7160; Accounting office used EN-GAS system

Disbursement are made only for approved purposes Well documented accounting records

Accountable financial officers are known and their responsibil ities are clear

Sanctions regarding financial transactions are clear and enforced Clear financial transaction procedure

Monthly financial reports are available Annual financial statements are certified Annual financial statements are submitted within 60 days after 31 st of December Summary of Income and Expenditure are posted

Annual Financial statements are made available upon request Financial statements are published in the local media

Financial management information system is automated

Functionality of Bids and Awards

30



The composition of Bids and Awards Committee of LGU Malaybalay is in accordance

with Section 11 of Republic Act No. 9184 or Government Procurement Reform Act. All procurement procedures are enforced thru the preparation of bidding documents, posting of invitation to bid, conduct of pre-procurement and pre-bid conference and determination of the eligibil ity of perspective bidders. Bids and Awards Committee meeting held at the

Engineering office of the City Government of Malaybalay every Tuesday of the week or upon request. The proceedings of the meeting are documented.

On Valuing Fundamentals of Governance


Your LGU is doing an excellent performance in 1 out of 3 sub-areas of Valuing Fundamentals of Governance. Sustain Performance in this area:


Interpretation

Transparency

Transparency in governmental operations is remarkable.

Communicating to the public through various means, i .e., Bulletin Board, Public Information Office or Desk, print,

broadcast media, website, and forum, is valued.

31




The areas for improvement are l isted by priority, starting from the area which gets

the lowest performance scale followed by areas which get higher performance scales, respectively.

Priority Area for

Improvement

Performance


Participation 4.00

High but not

Excellent

Strengthening CSO participation in Local Special

Bodies and the Citizen Feedback system, including the maximization of CSO engagement in development projects is a MUST action. There are merits to it. In addition to the principal of

participation, other desirable governance values like transparency, accountabil ity and consensus-

influenced decisions are reinforced.

Financial

Accountabil ity

4.83 High but not

Excellent

Efforts to improve financial accountabil ity are acknowledged. However, administrative capacity to ensure observance of guidelines relative to accounting, internal control, procurement and

financial transactions need to be strengthened.

32



Financial Management

This financial governance performance report provides a practical tool to gauge LGU financial performance as compared to financial performance of al l LGUs within the same

LGU type and income class. This information helps whether LGU is ahead or lagging behind with many LGUs for purposed of maintaining good performance or catching up.

This report is divided into two parts: (1) Revenue Generation and (2) Resource

Allocation and Utilization. It is hoped that the information presented each table would help plan ahead for the LGU and adjust revenue and expenditure priorities in accordance with

the financial realities, projections and priorities of the organization.

Revenue Generation

Cost to collect revenues

Indicator : Cost to Collect Revenues Computation : (cost in collecting revenues/total local revenues collected) x 100 Significance : Determines local revenue collection efficiency Desired performance : Should be lower than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class Exceptional performance : Lower for both conditions:

(1) Average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2) Na tional average of the same LGU type regardless of income class

The City Government of Malaybalay extremely performs in the area of collecting taxes. By comparing the year 2010 and 2011, about 3.15% gaps increased in cost to collect

revenues as shown in the graph above. The office of the treasurer is the responsible office to do the collections and oblige to adhere by implementing strict office plans, policies and

programs to sustain the trust and confidence of the chief executive. To enumerate their

efforts; (1) they were tasked to conduct inspection to private and commercial establishments in the city, (2) initiate tax information drive all over the barangays, (3) Sending bil ls to all existing establishments and (4) collect taxes, fees and other charges.

The city holds the Business One Stop Shop (BOSS) at the People’s Hall building,

wherein all the needed requirements are provided for the convenience of the applicants. The area is enough to accommodate tax payers applying business permits. To ensure

2010 2011

33



transparency, accountability and reduce processing time, the LGU initiatively shortened the

number of steps for signatures. The city also developed an Integrated Revenue Generation System, a computerized system that helps improve the quality and accuracy of tax collections. The new system is

now on the process of refinement as to the connection to the different offices involved in the business l icensing such as the database of the City Accounting Office, City Assessor’s

Office, City Budget Office, City Treasurer’s Office and the City Mayor’s Office – Licensing Division. The system also helped identify the real and actual situation of the properties and can generate payment history of the individual taxpayer and even identifies delinquent payers and the amount of expected collectibles. Through this, it can be determined that for

the next proceeding years the city need not to increase taxes in order to increase revenues but only to be more effective and proficient in terms of collection.

Locally-sourced Revenues to total income

Indicator : Locally-Sourced Revenues to Total Income Computation : Amount of locally-sourced revenues/Total LGU Income) x 100 Significance : Determines local revenue collection effort and dependency from

external revenue sources, eq. IRA & other inter-governmental fund transfer

Desired performance : Loca lly-sourced revenues to total income should be higher than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class

Exceptional performance : Locally-sourced revenues to total income should be higher than the:

(1) average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2) national average of the same LGU type regardless of income class

The LGU of Malaybalay sti l l dependent on Internal Revenue Allotment. In fact in 2011, 1.6% increase dependency rate from external revenue sources. This means that the

city needs to exert more efforts and adopt alternative strategic solutions to augment local collections in tax revenue. By continuing the well organized Business One Stop Shop (BOSS), One Town One Product (OTOP), Computerized Financial System, and the hands-on

2010 2011

34



employees of the city government, the city positively cope-up the dependency issues on

Internal Revenue Allotment (IRA).

Regular Revenue to total income

Indicator : Regular Revenues to Total Income Computation : [(Locally Sourced Revenues + IRA)/Total LGU Income] x 100 Significance : Describes reliability of funding sources Desired performance : Should be higher than the average of LGUs with the same

LGU type and income class Exceptional Performance : Should be higher than the:

(1) a verage of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class,

(2) national average of the same LGU type regardless of income class

The LGU Malaybalay still on the peak in terms of reliable source of revenues, as we

can see the graph above it increases by about .01% in 2011. Malaybalay sti l l lead the highest reliabil ity weight against the same income class and the national average city.

Through the initiative and innovative ideas of the trusted officials in the city, LGU come up with the bigger number of establishments that invested in the city.

2010 2011

35



Locally source revenue level

Indicator : Loca lly-Sourced Revenue Level Computation : Amount of Locally-Sourced Revenue

Significance : Describes locally-sourced revenue gap between the LGU and a verage of LGUs (by LGU type and income class)

Desired performance : Should be higher than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class

Exceptional performance: Should be higher than the: (1) Average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class,

(2) Na tional average of the same LGU type regardless of income class

The graph above shows in 2011, it was 1.49% decreased gap in locally-sourced

revenue as to compare in 2010. Meaning, the city sti ll below in locally source revenue level against to cities with the same income class and national average city. This further supports

the above data on the LGU’s dependency on external sources. The LGU must discuss issues that needs to be focused on.

Locally source revenue per capita

2010 2011

2010 2011

36



Indicator : Loca lly-Sourced Revenue Per Capita Computation : (a mount of locally-sourced revenue/population) Significance : Describes locally-sourced revenue per capita gap between your

LGU a nd average of LGUs Desired performance : Should be higher than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type

and income class Exceptional performance: Should be higher than the:

(1) Average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2) Na tional average of the same LGU type regardless of income class

The city has 416.47 of locally generated revenue per capita in 2011. The graph above i l lustrated that the LGU Malaybalay generate below half percent in collections of revenue

per capita as to compare to other same income class cities and national average cities. This means that on a per capita or per person basis, the city only collected about 416.47 worth of taxes per person. With this, LGU must be focused in full attention to locally revenue

collections to improve the revenue per capita.

Real Property Tax Accomplishment Rate

Indicator : Real Property Tax (RPT) Accomplishment Rate

Computation : (Amount of RPT collected/Amount of projected RPT collectibles) x 100

Significance : RPT is one of the major sources of income of LGUs in general. This indicator determines local revenue collection effort on RPT.

Desired performance : Should be higher than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type a nd income class

Exceptional performance: Should be higher than the: (1) Average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2) National average of the same LGU type regardless of income class

2009

2010 2011

37



The LGU maintains the higher average weighs against the other same income class

cities and national average cities. Employees of the City Government of Malaybalay perform tremendous job in terms of real property tax collection because it has collected 177.89% higher than their projected collections. The graph indicates that in 2011, it shows huge increase in performance collection which means that the real property tax collections were

efficiently and effectively implemented. However, there are cases that the possible projection of collectibles is sometimes lower to start but sti l l they could easily attain the

difficulties. This is one of the best accomplishments of the LGU and indeed it wil l continue to aim high in terms of real property tax collections.

Resourced Allocation and Utilization

Personal Services Expenditure Ratio

Indicator : Personal Services Expenditure Ratio Computation : (Personnel services expenditures/Total expenditures) x 100 Significance : Determines the biases of the local government unit in terms of

budget allocation Desired performance : Determines the biases of the local government unit in terms of

budget allocation LGU type and income class. Should not exceed with the ceiling as mandated by law, i.e., for 1st - 3rd class LGUs – 45%, for 4th – 6th class LGUS - 55%.

Exceptional performance: Met these three conditions: (1) lower than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2) lower than national average of LGUs with the same LGU type regardless of income class, (3) Did not exceed the 45-55 ce iling for P.S.

The city expenses for the personal services in 2011 was increased to 39.55% from 32.17% in 2010 way up the mandated ceiling of 33.35% of the same income class cities and

37.36% in the national average cities. The graph above shows LGU increases its expenditure in order to allocate additional budget to address issues and concerns to different sectors. In fact, almost all of the services to different sectors were already served.

2009

2010 2011

38



Total Expenditure Per Capita

Indicator : Total expenditures/population

Computation : Describes how much was actually spent by the LGU in a per capita basis.

Significance : Determines the biases of the local government unit in terms of budget allocation

Desired performance : Should be higher than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class

Exceptional performance: Should be higher than the: (1) Average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2) Na tional average of the same LGU type regardless of income class.

LGU Malaybalay still on the highest average spent in per capita basis as compare to other same income class cities and national average cities. The graph above shows that 2011 increases its expenditure to 4,443.00 against in 2010 which is about 4,126.31. LGU needs to implement austerity measures to minimize the cost of expenditures.

2010 2011

39



Debt Service Ratio

Indicator : Debt Service Ratio

Computation : Actual debt service cost/regular income

Significance : Considers the proportion of actual debt service costs to total regular income.

Desired performance : Should not exceed 20% of the regular income. That is the debt servicing limitation set for under LG Code of 1991.

The City Government of Malaybalay did not exceed 20% of the regular income as

amended by l imitation set from the Local Government Code of 1991. In 2010, it was 2.68% on its proportion in Debt Ratio and it continued to rate down to 2.36% in 2011.

2010 2011

40



Provincial Summary Report

Provincial Summary Report Bukidnon, e-SLGPR - DCY 2011

Administrative Governance Data Capture Form,2011


Local Legislation Development

Planning Revenue

Generation

Resource Allocation and

Utilization

Customer Service - Civil Applications


Development

Excellent 0 0 2 0 6 18

High 7 18 8 12 13 3

Fair 12 4 7 9 3 1

Low 3 0 5 1 0 0

Very Low 0 0 0 0 0 0

No Data 0 0 0 0 0 0

Note: Total No. of Component LGUs is 22

Administrative Governance

Data Capture Form,2011

Component

LGU

Income

Class

Local

Legislation

Development

Planning

Revenue

Generation

Resource Allocation

and Utilization

Customer Service - Civil

Applications


Development

1 Malaybalay City

1st 3.92 4.92 4.19 4.50 4.75 5.00

2 Valencia City 2nd 2.70 4.63 3.00 4.92 3.30 5.00

3 Don Carlos 1st 3.70 4.10 3.85 3.67 4.60 5.00

4 Impasugong 1st 3.79 4.91 3.52 4.50 5.00 5.00

5 Kitaotao 1st 3.06 3.66 2.26 3.50 4.60 5.00

6 Lantapan 1st 3.50 4.79 4.26 3.71 3.35 5.00

7 Libona 1st 3.25 4.44 4.19 4.00 4.80 3.00

8 Manolo

Fortich 1st 4.78 4.91 5.00 3.92 5.00 5.00

9 Maramag 1st 4.42 4.91 4.33 4.00 5.00 4.20

10 Pangantucan 1st 3.72 4.86 4.00 3.21 4.80 5.00

11 Quezon 1st 3.06 4.81 3.83 4.00 5.00 4.20

12 San Fernando 1st 4.28 4.24 3.59 4.33 4.60 5.00

13 Talakag 1st 3.08 3.92 2.19 3.67 4.60 4.20

14 Baungon 2nd 3.83 4.69 2.70 4.42 4.60 5.00

15 Kalilangan 2nd 3.06 4.91 4.19 4.00 4.15 5.00

16 Kibawe 2nd 4.14 4.91 4.02 2.83 4.60 5.00

17 Malitbog 2nd 4.25 3.92 2.19 4.88 4.30 5.00

18 Cabanglasan 3rd 4.00 4.91 3.45 3.79 4.35 5.00

19 Dangcagan 3rd 3.08 4.91 4.26 4.38 5.00 5.00

20 Kadingilan 3rd 2.95 4.72 3.52 4.00 4.60 5.00

21 Damulog 4th 2.31 3.82 2.33 3.22 5.00 5.00

22 Sumilao 4th 4.56 4.83 5.00 3.83 3.80 5.00

41




Social Governance



Health Services Support to Education Services

Support to Housing and Basic Utilities

Peace, Security and Disaster Risk Management

Excellent 1 1 12 0

High 19 14 2 18

Fair 1 6 5 3

Low 0 0 0 0

Very Low 0 0 2 0

No Data 1 1 1 1


Social Governance


Component LGU

Income Class

Health Services

Support to Education Services

Support to Housing and Basic Utilities

Peace, Security and Disaster Risk Management

1 Malaybalay City 1st 4.84 4.80 4.00 4.54

2 Valencia City 2nd 4.50 4.45 1.00 4.21

3 Don Carlos 1st 4.50 5.00 4.20 4.15

4 Impasugong 1st 4.82 4.20 5.00 4.08

5 Kitaotao 1st 4.50 4.30 5.00 3.56

6 Lantapan 1st 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

7 Libona 1st 4.29 3.55 5.00 4.38

8 Manolo Fortich 1st 4.82 4.55 5.00 4.33

9 Maramag 1st 4.97 4.75 5.00 4.62

10 Pangantucan 1st 5.00 4.30 5.00 4.70

11 Quezon 1st 4.35 4.30 5.00 4.62

12 San Fernando 1st 4.60 3.35 3.40 4.27

13 Talakag 1st 4.60 3.40 1.00 4.06

14 Baungon 2nd 4.87 3.80 3.40 4.57

15 Kalilangan 2nd 3.88 3.30 3.40 4.32

16 Kibawe 2nd 4.09 4.80 3.40 4.26

17 Malitbog 2nd 4.34 4.25 5.00 4.43

18 Cabanglasan 3rd 4.63 3.20 5.00 4.69

19 Dangcagan 3rd 4.82 4.25 5.00 3.94

20 Kadingilan 3rd 4.89 4.55 3.40 3.69

21 Damulog 4th 4.87 4.10 5.00 4.13

22 Sumilao 4th 4.43 4.55 5.00 4.61

42




Economic Governance


Performance Description Support to Agriculture

Sector Support to Fishery

Services Entrepreneurship, Business and

Industry Promotion

Excellent 0 0 1

High 13 0 4

Fair 8 0 11

Low 0 0 5

Very Low 1 0 0

No Data 0 0 1


Economic Governance


Component LGU Income Class

Support to Agriculture Sector

Support to Fishery Services

Entrepreneurship, Business and Industry Promotion

1 Malaybalay City 1st 4.67

4.17

2 Valencia City 2nd 3.90

3.42

3 Don Carlos 1st 4.67

3.27

4 Impasugong 1st 4.48

5.00

5 Kitaotao 1st 3.52

2.44

6 Lantapan 1st 3.62

0.00

7 Libona 1st 4.57

3.11

8 Manolo Fortich 1st 4.67

4.17

9 Maramag 1st 4.67

4.81

10 Pangantucan 1st 4.76

3.77

11 Quezon 1st 4.00

2.50

12 San Fernando 1st 4.67

3.98

13 Talakag 1st 3.90

3.10

14 Baungon 2nd 3.57

3.00

15 Kalilangan 2nd 3.95

3.67

16 Kibawe 2nd 4.00

2.27

17 Malitbog 2nd 4.57

2.52

18 Cabanglasan 3rd 1.65

3.67

19 Dangcagan 3rd 4.48

4.17

20 Kadingilan 3rd 4.67

2.65

21 Damulog 4th 3.95

3.21

22 Sumilao 4th 3.71

3.34

Note: Blank cell means "Not Applicable"

43




Environmental Governance


Performance Description Forest Ecosystems

Management Freshwater Ecosystems

Management

Coastal Marine Ecosystems

Management

Urban Ecosystems Management

Excellent 17 17 0 0

High 3 2 0 17

Fair 2 1 0 5

Low 0 1 0 0

Very Low 0 1 0 0

No Data 0 0 0 0


Environmental Governance Data Capture Form,2011

Component LGU

Income

Class

Forest Ecosystems

Management

Freshwater Ecosystems

Management

Coastal Marine Ecosystems

Management

Urban Ecosystems

Management

1 Malaybalay City 1st 5.00 5.00

4.23

2 Valencia City 2nd 5.00 5.00

3.55

3 Don Carlos 1st 5.00 5.00

4.00

4 Impasugong 1st 5.00 5.00

4.33

5 Kitaotao 1st 3.33 3.33

3.11

6 Lantapan 1st 5.00 5.00

3.45

7 Libona 1st 5.00 5.00

4.43

8 Manolo Fortich 1st 5.00 5.00

4.53

9 Maramag 1st 5.00 5.00

4.65

10 Pangantucan 1st 5.00 5.00

4.48

11 Quezon 1st 5.00 5.00

4.00

12 San Fernando 1st 5.00 4.67

3.53

13 Talakag 1st 3.33 1.67

4.05

14 Baungon 2nd 4.67 5.00

3.98

15 Kalilangan 2nd 4.33 5.00

4.15

16 Kibawe 2nd 5.00 4.33

4.40

17 Malitbog 2nd 5.00 5.00

4.35

18 Cabanglasan 3rd 5.00 5.00

4.15

19 Dangcagan 3rd 5.00 2.33

4.13

20 Kadingilan 3rd 5.00 5.00

4.88

21 Damulog 4th 4.67 5.00

4.45

22 Sumilao 4th 5.00 5.00

4.33

Note: Blank cell means "Not Applicable"

44




Valuing Fundamentals of Governance


Performance Description Participation Transparency Financial Accountability

Excellent 6 2 0

High 13 18 22

Fair 2 2 0

Low 1 0 0

Very Low 0 0 0

No Data 0 0 0


Valuing Fundamentals of Governance Data Capture Form,2011

Component LGU Income Class Participation Transparency Financial Accountability

1 Malaybalay City 1st 4.00 5.00 4.83

2 Valencia City 2nd 5.00 4.20 4.55

3 Don Carlos 1st 5.00 4.73 4.92

4 Impasugong 1st 4.00 4.60 4.81

5 Kitaotao 1st 4.33 4.73 4.11

6 Lantapan 1st 4.33 4.73 4.07

7 Libona 1st 4.00 3.27 4.31

8 Manolo Fortich 1st 4.33 4.60 4.67

9 Maramag 1st 4.00 5.00 4.83

10 Pangantucan 1st 4.00 4.60 4.89

11 Quezon 1st 2.33 4.73 4.51

12 San Fernando 1st 5.00 4.60 4.81

13 Talakag 1st 4.00 4.60 4.67

14 Baungon 2nd 4.00 4.33 4.68

15 Kalilangan 2nd 5.00 4.87 4.92

16 Kibawe 2nd 4.00 4.47 4.81

17 Malitbog 2nd 5.00 3.40 4.77

18 Cabanglasan 3rd 3.67 4.33 4.36

19 Dangcagan 3rd 5.00 4.60 4.60

20 Kadingilan 3rd 3.67 4.20 4.68

21 Damulog 4th 4.00 4.20 4.40

22 Sumilao 4th 4.33 4.47 4.68

45



ATTACHMENTS

46



Republic of the Philippines

Province of Bukidnon

CITY OF MALAYBALAY * * *

MINUTES DURING THE LOCAL GOVERNANCE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM VALIDATION

HELD AT THE PEOPLE’S HALL ON MARCH 15, 2012.

ATTENDANCE Mr. HERCULANO S. RONOLO - Ci ty Administra tor- Designa te Engr. ADRIAN R. GAMBOA - Pla nning Officer IV- OIC Mr. BENEDICT ANGCO - CBO Mr. DANILO D. LINO-AY - CTO Engr. JACQUELINE LONGAKIT - CEO Ms. RICA P. CARCUEVA - Ci ty Accounting Office Ms. MARIA B. DANIOT - LGOO Ms. MARIA RICA E. RAGURO - Ci ty Hea lth Office Mr. ARTURO C. CALLAO - Ci ty Licensing Office Ms. SEMPORIANA A. PAREDES - SP Ms. JULIETA DOMINGUEZ - HRMO Ms. Ma . ANITA L. FERNANDEZ - OIC-CENRO Mr. MILO B. LIM - LCR Ms. VIRGINIA I. FLORES - CSWDO Ms. ALICIA S. ALEGRES - CASSO Mr. REX DACANAY - CPDO Ms. KRISTINA EGNAR - CPDO PRELIMINARY

Ca l l to Order a t 1:30 PM

The meeting started with a prayer and followed by the singing of the national anthem using video presentation. Mr. Adrian R. Gamboa, Ci ty Planning Officer IV - OIC called the attenda nce a nd delivered a welcome address. Mr. Rex C. Dacanay a staff of the City Planning Office presented the fi l led-up Da ta Ca ptured Form (DCF) to the pa rticipa nts for the fina l va l ida tion.

PRESENTATION OF AGENDA

LGMPS Version 2 Validation Activity: a. Administrative Governance b. Social Governance c. Economic Governance d. Environmental Governance

Ms. Rex C. Dacanay presented the data gathered from the different offices through the Data

Ca ptured Form (DCF) of the Local Governance Performance Management System Version 2 of the Department of Interior Local Government (DILG). During the presentation, majority of the questions were posi tive ly a nswered. However, Issues a nd Concerns we re being ta ckled.

CIT

Y O

F MALAYB

AL

AY

OFF IC IAL SEA

L

47



Issues and concerns for the Administrative Governance:

* For SP Office, no real-time legislative tacking system being designed, but the office used existing computer functions such a s ms a ccess for ea sy tra cking purposes. * Decrea se number of ordina nces over legisla tive mea sures * For the Ci ty Development Plan, still on the process for updating which is pending upon the a pprova l of the CLUP * The upda ted revenue code ha s not yet ena cted

Issues and concerns for the Social Governance:

* LSB Committee does not meet a t lea st once a month or a s often a s necessa ry * No appropriate budget that allocates for the Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses for the Ka ta runga ng Pa mba ra nga y * No appropriate budget that allocates for the conduct of continuing educa tion for the Lupon Members a nd cover expenses for ca pita l outla ys. Issues and concerns for the Economic Governance:

* LGU Ma la yba la y needs to extend more support to the Agriculture Sector.

Issues and concerns for the Environment Governance:

* Initial steps for the conduct of WACS and review of the plan, but the result were not yet

presented for a pprova l of the SWMB.

* Only about 27 barangays having material recovery facilities and it needs minimum repa ir

Issues and concerns for the Valuing Governance:

* Strengthening the CSO participation in Local Special Bodies and the Citizen Feedback system * Efforts to improve financial accountability.

APPROVAL OF THE VALIDATION

Ms. Rica Raguro moved for the a pprova l of the va l ida tion of the Loca l Governa nce Performa nce Ma na gement System, duly seconded by Engr Ja cquel ine G. Longa kit.

48



ADJOURNMENT OF THE ACTIVITY

There being no more discussions and issues to be tackled, Ms. Daniot asked for a motion to

a djourn the meeting.

On motion of Ms. Julieta Dominguez, duly seconded by Ms. Ma . Anita l . Ferna ndez, the

a ctivi ty for the va l ida tion of Version 2 LGPMS wa s a djourned a t 4:30 PM.

Prepa red by: REX C. DACANAY CPDO Sta ff

Noted by:

ADRIAN R. GAMBOA Pla nning Officer IV- OIC

49



LGU Basic Facts and Figures LGU Na me : City Government of Malaybalay Province or Provincial Location : Bukidnon Region : X

Basic Profile

LGU Type: Income Class: ___HUC ___1st ___2nd ___3rd ___4th ___5th ___6th Population (2011) : 155,427 Total Land Area (in has.) : 108,259 has. No. of Barangays : 46 No. of Households : 32,201

Financial Profile (2011)

IRA Share : 765,890,943.00 Loca l-Sourced Revenues : 64,730,277.48 Other Revenues : 12,478,454.62 Total LGU Income : 843,099,675.10 Ecosystem ___ Agricultural Ecosystem ___ Forest Ecosystem ___ Coa stal Marine Ecosystem ___ Freshwater Ecosystem Tourism Potential ___ Beach Resort ___ History and Culture (e.g., fort, cathedral and church, historical road, historical monument, museum, structures and buildings) ___ Hotels ___ Na tural attractions Economic Activity (Rank accordingly, skip if not applicable) _1_ Agricultural ___ Fishery ___ Mining _3_ Industrial _2_ Commercial and Service Centers Contact Information Na me of Mayor or Governor : HON. IGNACIO W. ZUBIRI Mobile Number : 09209028426 Telephone Number : 088-221-2267 Fa x Number : 088-221-4266 Website Address : ma [email protected]

50



STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE PERFORMANCE (ADMINISTRATIVE GOVERNANCE)

Ma laybalay Year Profile: 2011 - LGPMS Performance Area: Administrative Governance Service Area: Local Legislation Instruction: Your answers to the questions below determine your LGU performance in local

legislation. Take note that this is a self-assessment tool.

1. Determine the quality of the Legislative Agenda by answering the following questions:

1.1 Is your Legislative Agenda supportive of the Executive Agenda? Yes Pa rtial No

1.2 Is the agenda a product of research or a product of consultations with stakeholders? Yes Pa rtial No

Notes:

1. It refers to a pa rticula r session of the sa nggunia n. Sec. 52 of the LG Code of 1991 ma ndates the conduct of a weekly regular session for the sa nggunia n except for the sa nggunia ng ba ra nga ys.

2. The Legislative Agenda supports the Executive Agenda by way of:

(1) a ppropriations ordinances, 2)other supportive legislative ena ctments l ike pol icies, rules or guidelines in carrying out items in the Executive Agenda, or 3)thru the exercise of legislative oversight function. Answer “Yes” if the sanggunian fully or excellently performs a ll of the three items, “Partial” if the sanggunian partially or satisfa ctori ly performs the three items, or “No if the sanggunia n fa i led to or poorly performs the three i tems.

3. Answer “Yes” if all items in the agenda are resea rched, studied or a re the results of

consultations, “Partial” if some but not all of the items in the a genda a re resea rched, studied or results of consultations, or “No” if the agenda is neither a product of resea rch nor a product of consulta tion with sta keholders.

2. Does your sanggunian have a system that tracks information on local legislations?

Yes No

If Yes, is the tracking system capable of generating information on?

51



2.1 Existing local rules and regulations which complement national laws or policies Yes No

2.2 Existing local rules and regulations which are being enforced

Yes No

2.3 Existing local rules and regulations which are not being enforced Yes

No

2.4 Existing local rules and regulations to avoid duplication of legislation Yes No

2.5 The status of a draft ordinance in the legislative process Yes No

2.6 Na ture of the Legislative Tracking System Computerized Computer-Aided Ma nual

Notes:

1. Computerized means that an embedded system is specially developed for tracking legislative enactments and actions, with rea l -time computing a nd reporting design. Computer-aided means that there is no specia l system designed for legislative tracking and actions but used existing computer functions such a s excel or access for the purpose. Manual means that all documents are indexed a nd processed without the help of a computer.

3. Which of the following Codes are already enacted by the sanggunian?

3.1 Code of General Ordinances Yes No

3.2 Revenue Code Yes No

3.3 Local Investment and Incentive Code Yes No

52



3.4 Ma rket Code Yes No NA

3.5 Health and Sanitation Code Yes No

3.6 Code for Children Yes No

3.7 Gender and Development Code Yes No

3.8 Environmental Code Yes No

3.9 Zoning Ordinance Yes No

Notes: 1. Those codes are in support of Administrative Functions, Regula tory Ma nda tes,

Corpora te Objectives, Socia l Development, Economic Development a nd Environmental Management of the LGU. Decisions of the sa nggunia n come in four (4) major types – administrative in intent, regulatory in nature, corporate in purpose a nd developmenta l in focus.

2. A code contains ordinances on the same subject matter regardless of the yea r of

enactment, in a codified manner. It embodies local rules and regulations dra wn from such ordinances or resolutions which partake the na ture of ordina nces. Codi fication impl ies the fol lowing processes: revision, a mendment a nd supplementation, the latter as a Administrative Governance wa y to upda te the code in consideration of new laws or new ordinances on the same subject matter. An exception to this is the Code of General Ordinances which contains di fferent subjects which a re a dministra tive in na ture a nd intent.

1. "NA" means not applicable.

4. Determine the percentage (%) of ordinances over legislative measures.

96 - 100 % 91 - 95 % 86 - 90 % 80 - 85 % below 80%

53



Notes:

1. To compute, (Total number of ordinances / Total legislative measures x 100) 2. Benchmark: 90% - Target estimate

Performance Area: Administrative Governance Service Area: Development Planning Instruction: Your answers to questions below determine your LGU performance in development

planning. Take note that this is a self-assessment tool.

1. Is the Local Development Council organized? Yes No

If Yes, determine the functionality of the LDC based on composition, meetings, and performance. On composition:

1.1 Is the LDC composition in accordance with the LG Code?

Yes Pa rtial No

1.2 Is the Executive Committee organized pursuant to the LG Code? Yes Pa rtial No

1.3 Are Sectoral or Functional Committees organized to assist the LDC? Yes No

On meetings:

1.4 Does the LDC meet at least once every six months?

Yes No

1.5 Does the Executive Committee meet as often as necessary? Yes No

1.6 Does the Sectoral or Functional Committees meet as often as necessary?

Yes No

1.7 Is there an organized agenda for every meeting? Yes Pa rtial No

54



1.8 Is every meeting documented? Yes Pa rtial No

1.9 Are the decisions embodied through resolutions of the LDC or of the Sectora l or Functiona l Committees?

Yes Pa rtial No

1.10 On performance:

Good Somewhat Good Poor

Notes:

1. LDC is organized when there is an executive or legislative issuance for the matter.

2. LDC composition is based on Sec.107 of LG Code of 1991, a s fol lows: The Ci ty

Ma yor or Municipal Mayor, in the case of Ci ty or Municipal Development Council, a s Head. All Punong Barangays in the locality; the Chairman of the Committee on a ppropriations of the Sa nggunia nPa nlungsod or Sa nggunia ng Ba ya n; the Congressman or His representative; and representatives of non-governmenta l orga niza tions opera ting in the ci ty or municipa l i ty, a s members. NGO representatives shall constitute not less than one-fourth (1/4) of the members of the ful ly orga nized counci l . The Governor, in the ca se of the Provincia l Development Council, as Head.All Mayors of component cities and municipalities; the Cha irma n of the committee on Appropria tions of the Sa nggunia nPa nla la wiga n; the Congressma n or His representa tive; a nd Representatives of the non-government organization operating in the province, a s members. NGO representatives shall constitute not less than one-fourth (1/4) of the members of ful ly orga nized counci l . Or in the ca se of ARMM, LDC composition is based on Sec. 108 of LG Code of the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao, as follows: The Ci ty Ma yor or Municipal Mayor, in the case of Ci ty or Municipal Development Council, as Head. The Chairman of the Committee on Appropriations of the SanggunianPa nlungsod or Sa nggunia ng Ba ya n; the Congressman or His representative; the Assemblymen or their representa tives; a ndRepresentatives of non-governmental organizations operating in the ci ty or municipality, as members. NGO representatives shall consti tute not less tha n one-fourth (1/4) of the members of the ful ly orga nized counci l .

The Governor, in the case of the Provincial Development Counci l , a s Hea d.Al l Ma yors of component cities and municipalities; the Chairman of the Committee on Appropriations of the Sanggunia nPa nla la wiga n; the Congressma n or His representative; and Representa tives of the non-government orga niza tion operating in the province, as members. NGO representatives shall constitute not less tha n one -fourth (1/4) of the members of ful ly orga nized counci l .

55



3. The Executive Committee of the Ci ty or Municipal Development Council sha l l be composed of the City Ma yor or Municipal Mayor as Chairman: the Cha irma n of the Committee on appropriations of the sanggunianpanlungsod or ba ya n; the president of the city or municipality’s League of Barangays; and a representative of nongovernmental organiza tions tha t a re represented in the counci l , a s members.

The Provincial Development Council Executive Committee shall be composed of the Governor a s cha irma n: the Representa tive of component ci ty a nd municipalmayors to be chosen form among themselves; the Cha irma n of the Committee on Appropriations of the SanggunianPanlalawigan; the President of the Provincial League of Barangays; and a Representative of nongovernmenta l orga niza tions tha t a re represented in the counci l , a s members.

4. LDC Performance is “Good” if the LDC was able to formula te, or upda te, long-

term, medium-term and annual socio-economic development plans and policies; formulate, or update, medium-term and annual publ ic investment progra ms; a ppraise and prioritize socio-economic development progra ms a nd projects; formulate, or update, local investment incentives to promote the inflow a nd direction of private investment capital; and coordinate, monitor and evaluate the implementation of development progra ms a nd projects. LDC Performa nce is “Somewhat Good” if at least one of the functions mentioned a bove is not exercised. LDC Performance is “Poor” if none of the functionsmentioned above is exercised.

2. Does the Planning and Development Coordination Office maintain a database

for development planning? Yes No

If Yes, does the database contain updated: 2.1 demographic data, e.g. growth rate, population density, etc.

Yes Pa rtial No

2.2 Social development data, e.g. data on education, health, housing and basic utilities, peace and order, etc.

Yes Pa rtial No

2.3 Economic development data, e.g. data on poverty, labor and employment, etc.

Yes Pa rtial No

56



2.4 Environmental data, e.g. data on forest, agricultural, coastal marine, freshwater, biodiversi ty a nd urba n ecosystems, etc.

Yes Pa rtial No

2.5 physical land use data Yes Pa rtial No

2.6 Institutional data whether of the local government or of the non-government

sector, e.g. financial data, personnel competencies, list of NGOs and their thrusts

Yes Pa rtial No

2.7 Does your LGU use a Geographic Information System (GIS)? Yes No

Notes: 1. A da ta ba se is a ma ss or orga nized da ta stored in a computer. 2. For question 2.1, answer “Yes” if essential data are complete, a nd tha t reports

a nd plans can be done with ease since all the information needed a re rea di ly a vailable, “Pa rtial” if some of the da ta a re there but not complete a nd tha t reports and plans can be done with little difficulty since some of the data are not readily available, or “No” if most if not all of the data are absent and that reports a nd plans can be done with utmost di fficul ty since most of the da ta a re not rea di ly a va i la ble .

4. Does your LGU have a Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP)?

Yes No

If Yes, Is the CDP formulated in accordance with the following? 4.1 Pa rticipatory in its formulation

Yes Pa rtial No

4.2 Socio-economic development thrusts are embodied in the Plan Yes No

4.3 Development strategies are embodied in the Plan Yes No

57



4.4 Local Development Investment Program, which contains the list of programs and projects with corresponding costs to be funded from internal or external sources, is an integral component of the CDP.

Yes No

4.5 Monitoring and Evaluation is an integral component of the Plan Yes No

4.6 Supportive of overall provincial development thrusts Yes No

NA 4.7 Is the CDP updated, at least every six years?

Yes No

Notes:

1. Pa rtial means that not all concerned stakeholders are consulted.

5. Does your LGU have an approved Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP)? Yes No

If Yes, is the CLUP formulated in accordance with the following? 5.1 Pa rticipatory in its formulation

Yes Pa rtial No

5.2 Demography, socio-economic, infrastructure and utilities, land use and local a dministration are integral sectors in the Plan.

Yes No

5.3 Consistent with the Provincial Development Physical Framework Plan (for component cities only)

Yes No NA

5.4 Monitoring and evaluation is an integral component of the plan Yes No

5.5 Is the CLUP updated every 10 or 15 years? Yes No

58



Notes:

1. Partial means that not all concerned stakeholders are consulted.

6. Does your LGU have an Annual Investment Program (AIP)? Yes No

If Yes, is the AIP prepared in accordance to the following?

6.1 Consistent with the Local Development Investment Program Yes No

6.2 Embodies the following minimum information: projects to be undertaken, for

whom (area coverage and target beneficiaries), how, by whom, and when? Yes No

6.3 Financing is an integral component of the Plan Yes No

6.4 Monitoring and evaluation is an integral component Yes

No

7. Does your LGU have an Executive and Legislative Agenda (bonus point)? Yes No

Performance Area: Administrative Governance Service Area: Revenue Generation Instruction: Your answers to the questions below determine your LGU performa nce in genera ting

sufficient revenues to finance the delivery of essential public services. Take note tha t this is a self-assessment tool. Each of the information is critical and mandatory. Do not skip a ny i tem.

1. Determine the efficiency of system (methods or procedures) on LGU-imposed or collected

ta xes, fees a nd cha rges. System on a l l loca l ta xes, fees a nd cha rges

System on all local taxes, fees and charges

1.1 Operates on a network that is in interlinked with computers in the Offices of the Assessor, Business Permits a nd Licensing Officer a nd the Trea surer

Yes No

59



1.2 Incentive scheme is provided to promote efficiency in real property assessment a nd rea l property ta x col lection

Yes No

1.3 Civi l remedies on ta x del inquencies a re enforced Yes No

1.4 Information is disseminated on any proposed imposition and on the schedule of ma rket va lues used for a ssessment.

Yes No

1.5 Guided by a Loca l Revenue Code, which is not more tha n 5 yea rs old. Yes No

System on Real Property Tax

1.6 Guided by updated real property tax maps for property identification

Yes No

1.7 Real property records and information are indexed to faci l i ta te a ccess, a t the

very lea st time possible , by rea l property owners. Yes No

System on Business Tax

1.9 Ta x records management, i.e., conduct of business tax mapping, establishment

of a revenue da ta ba nk, a nd regula r upda ting of the l i st of ta xpa yers. Yes No

1.10 Implementation of revenue enhancement measures Yes No

2. Does your LGU have an Annual Revenue Generation Plan? Yes No

If Yes, determine the quality of the plan, using the following criteria: 2.1 Embodies local revenue policy direction(s) for the given year.

Yes No

60



2.2. Contains strategies that have to be undertaken in order to yield the a mount of revenues estima ted to be col lected for the given yea r.

Yes No

2.3 Identifies local government personnel responsible for ea ch stra tegy. Yes No

2.4 Includes the amount of revenues projected or estima ted to be genera ted a nnually from real property taxes, business taxes, fees and charges, a nd from other potential sources such as donations, grants, a nd sha re from na tiona l wea lth.

Yes No

2.5 Monitoring and evaluation is an integral component of the Plan Yes No

2.6 Uti lized by local financial generation managers in monitoring complishments, lapses and misses in revenue generation.

Yes No

2.7 Used as a principal reference document in updating the Revenue Code (a nswer only i f there is a Revenue Code).

Yes No NA

Notes:

1. Annual Revenue Generation Plan pertains to a plan that is patterned after

the Resource Mobilization Manual of BLGF.

3. Determine the percentage of cost to collect revenues to total locally-sourced revenues.

Cost to collect revenues to total locally-sourced revenues (in %) =

Notes:

a . Cost to col lect revenues includes sa la ries of col lection a gents, opera tions (computerization), publ ic a ddress notices, a nd a dvertisements, a mong others.

b. Loca lly-sourced revenue is composed of tax and non-tax revenues. Ta x revenues a re

sourced from Real Property Tax, Business Tax, and other taxes. Non-ta x revenues a re those that come from regulatory fees, service/user charges, receipts from economic enterprise , tol l fees, a nd other receipts.

c. To compute, (Revenue col lection cost ÷ tota l loca l ly-sourced revenue) x 100.

Revenue Collection Cost (2,942,275.55)/Total Locally Sourced Revenue (64,730,277.48) = 4.54%

61



4. How much is your actual collection from Real Property Tax (RPT) out of the RPT collectibles (in percenta ge)?

Real Property Tax Accomplishment Rate (in %) =

Notes: 1. To compute, (amount of RPT collected ÷ amount of projected RPT col lection) x

100.

5. How much of the total LGU income is generated from local sources (in percentage)?

Locally Sourced to Total LGU income (in %) =

Notes: 1. Loca l ly-sourced revenue is composed of ta x a nd non-ta x revenues. Ta x revenues are sourced from Real Property Ta x, Business Tax, and other taxes. Non-

ta x revenues are those that come from regulatory fees, service/user charges, receipts from economic enterprise , tol l fees, a nd other receipts.

2.Total LGU income is composed of local ly sourced revenues, IRA, other sha re from

na tional, and special revenues, i.e.,extraordinary receipts/financia l a ids, loa ns a nd borrowings, a nd inter-loca l fund tra nsfers.

3. To compute, (Loca l ly Sourced Revenues ÷ Tota l LGU Income) x 100.

6. What is the proportion of regula r revenues to tota l LGU income (in percenta ge)?

Regular Revenue to Total Income (in %) =

Notes:

1. Regula r revenues mea n loca l ly-sourced revenues plus IRA. 2. Tota l LGU income is composed of locally sourced revenues, IRA, other sha re from

na tional, and special revenues, i.e., extraordinary receipts/financial a ids, loa ns a nd borrowings, a nd inter-loca l fund tra nsfers.

3. To compute, (Regula r Revenues ÷ Tota l income) x 100

Amount of RPT Collected (11,919,089.70)/Amt. of projected RPT collection (6,700,000.00) = 177.89%

Locally sourced revenue (64,730,277.48)/Total LGU Income (843,099,675.10) = 7.68%

Regular Revenue (841,556,124.81)/Total Income (843,099,675.10) = 99.82%

62



Performance Area: Administrative Governance Service Area: Resource Allocation and Utilization Instruction: Your answers to the questions below determine your LGU performa nce in loca l

budgeting and expenditure. Take note that this is a self-assessment tool . Ea ch of the information is cri tica l a nd ma nda tory. Do not skip a ny i tem unless speci fied.

1. On Resource Allocation

Does your LGU operate on a re-enacted budget during the profile year? Yes No

If No, is the Annual Budget approved in consideration of the following?:

1.1 Responsive to the budgetary requirements of the Annual Investment Program Yes No

Satisfies the following budgetary, statutory, and contractual requirements and general limitations:

Budgetary requirements:

1.2 Amount appropriated did not exceed the estimates of income

Yes No

1.3 The amount of appropriations for debt servicing did not exceed 20% of the regula r income (a nswer only i f a ppl ica ble)

Yes No NA

1.4 20% component of IRA was appropriated for development projects Yes No

1.5 Provision for aid to barangays is not less than PhP 1,000

Yes No

General limitations:

1.6 Appropriations for discretionary purposes did not exceed 2% of the actual

receipts from basic real property tax Yes No

63



1.7 The total appropriations whether annual or supplemental for persona l services did not exceed 45% for 1st-3rd cla ss, a nd 55% for 4th-6th cla ss.

Yes No

Others:

1.8 An amount is appropriated for Gender and Development projects and activities (R.A. 7192 a nd E.O. 273, s. 1995)

a t least 5% of the total budget less than 5% None at all

1.9 An amount is appropriated for the operation and maintenance of the Office for Senior Citizens Affairs (R.A. 9257)

Yes No

1.10 An a mount is appropriated for the monitoring or surveillance of the magnitude of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome or AIDS (RA 8504)

Yes No

1.11 1% of the IRA is appropriated for the strengthening and implementation of the programs of the Local Counci l for the Protection of Chi ldren (R.A. 9344) Yes No

1.12 Approved within the period, October 17 to Dec. 31 Yes No

2. On Resource Utilization, What is the proportion of your LGU’s expenditures for personal services to tota l LGU expenditure (in percenta ge)?

Personal Services Expenditure Ratio (in %) =

Notes: 1. To compute, (personnel services expenditures ÷ total expenditures) x 100.

Personal Service Expense (275,095,683.04)/Total Expense (695,590,855.08) = 39.55%

64



3. Determine the amount of services extended by your LGU to its constituents on a per ca pita basis.

Total Expenditures per capita (in PhP) =

Notes: 1. To compute, (Total expenditures ÷ population).

4. Proportion of actual debt service payment of your LGU to total regular income (in %). Has your LGU availed loan?

Yes No

If yes, determine the proportion of actual debt service payment. Debt Service Ratio (in %) =

Notes:

1. Tota l regular income means locally-sourced income plus IRA. 2. To compute, (actual cost for debt servicing ÷ total regular income) x 100.

Performance Area: Administrative Governance Service Area: Customer Service - Civil Applications Instruction: Your answers to the questions below determine your LGU performa nce in providing

quality and fast service to customers in the processing of civil registry documents, i .e., birth and death certificates, and real property documents. Take note that this i s a self-assessment tool. Each of the information is critical and mandatory. Do not skip a ny i tem.

1. On Civi l Registry Documents, Determine the quality of customer service in the processing

of civil registry documents, i.e., birth and death certificates, using the following cri teria : 1.1 Ha s a database of civil registry records

Yes No

1.2 Set of steps in getting the civil registry records is made known to clients (either through website, posters or other means.)

Yes No

1.3 Procedure is clea r (i .e ., step or steps, processing time, processing fee, tra nsa ction hour, etc.)

Yes No

Total Expenditure (690,590,855.08)/Population (155,427) = 4,443

Actual cost for debt servicing (19,910,167.81)/LGU Income (843,099,675.10) = 2.36%

65



1.4. How long does it take to issue a civi l registry document, i .e ., bi rth or dea th certi fica te? 30 mins.or less More than 30 mins., but less than 2 hours 2 hours or more

Notes:

1. Processing Procedure -Computerized means that an embedded system is specially developed for the indexing and processing of rea l property documents, with real-time computing and reporting design. Computer-aided means that there is no special system designed for the indexing a nd processing of rea l property documents but used existing computer functions such a s excel or a ccess. Ma nual means that all documents are indexed and processed without the help of a computer.

2. On Real Property Documents

Determine the quality of customer service in the processing of real property documents, using the following criteria:

2.1 Processing of real property documents

Computerized Computer-Aided Ma nual

2.2 Procedure in securing real property documents is made known to clients (ei ther through website, posters or other mea ns.)

Yes No

2.3 Procedure is clea r (i .e ., step or steps, processing time, processing fee, tra nsa ction hour, etc.)

Yes No

2.4 Procedure is simple – not more than 4 steps, 4 documentary requirements, a nd 2 number of signa tories Yes No

2.5. How long does it take to issue a real property document? 30 minutes or less More than 30 minutes but less than 8 hours 8 hours or more

Notes: 1. Processing of real property documents -Computerized means that an embedded system is

specially developed for the indexing and processing of real property documents, with real-time computing and reporting design. Computer-a ided mea ns tha t there is no special system designed for the indexing and processing of real property documents but used existing computer functions such a s excel or a ccess. Ma nua l mea ns tha t a l l documents a re indexed a nd processed without the help of a computer.

66



Performance Area: Administrative Governance Service Area: Human Resource Management and Development Instruction: Your answers to questions below determine your LGU performa nce in ma na ging a nd

developing human resources. Take note that this is a self-assessment tool. Each of the informa tion is cri tica l a nd ma nda tory. Do not skip a ny i tem.

1. Determine the quality of human resource management and development, using the

following criteria: 1.1 Recruitment and selection are transparent

Yes Pa rtial No

1.2 Permanency in the nature of appointments is valued Yes No

1.3 Good performance is recognized Yes No

1.4 Sta ff development is available Yes No

1.5 Grievance system is in place Yes No

Notes: 1. For 1.1, a nswer “Yes” if all recruitment a nd se lection processes a nd results,

whether for plantilla or non-plantilla positions, are posted, “Partial” if some of the recruitment and selection process a nd results, whether for pla nti l la or non -plantilla positions, are posted, “No” if recruitment and e lection processes a nd results, whether for pla nti l la or non -pla nti l la posi tions, a re not posted.

2. For 1.2, a nswer “Yes” if at least 90\% of the total employees of the LGU occupy plantilla positions, “No” if below 90\% of the total employees of the LGU occupy pla nti l la posi tions.

3. For 1.3, a nswer “Yes” if good performers are recognized and given incentives in the form of cash or in kind. Recognition is ma de e i ther through personnel eva lua tion, wri tten recommenda tion, orpubl ic a cknowledgment.

4. For 1.4, a nswer “Yes” if staff development activities or opportunities a re ma de a vailable to staff, regardless of level , or posi tion in a given level , with low performa nce or to those sta ff who need ca reer a dva ncement

5. For 1.5, a nswer “Yes” if there is a grievance system where employees can air their grievances and properly responded to or acted upon. If this condition is not met, a nswer “No”.

67



STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE PERFORMANCE SOCIAL GOVERNANCE

Ma laybalay Year Profile: 2009 - LGPMS Performance Area: Social Governance Service Area: Health Services Instruction: Your answers to questions below determine your LGU performance in providing a ccess

to a nd quality health services. Take note that this is a sel f-a ssessment tool . Plea se a nswer a l l i tems.

1. On LHB functionality. Is the Local Health Board (LHB) organized1?

Yes No

If Yes, determine the functionality of the LHB based on composition, meetings, and

performance.

On Composition:

1.1 Is the LHB composition in accordance with the LG Code2? Yes Pa rtial No

On meetings:

1.2 Does the LHB meet at least once a month, or as often as necessary? Yes No



1.5 On performance: Good Somewhat Good Poor

68



Notes:

1. LHB is organized when there is an executive or legislative issuance for tha t ma tter. 2. LHB composition is based on Sec.102 of LG Code of 1991 or Sec. 98 of the LG Code of

ARMM a s fol lows:

Governor or City Ma yor or Municipal Mayor, as the case maybe, as Chairman: Health Officer a s Vice -Cha irma n; Cha irma n of the Committee on Hea lth of the Sa nggunia n Pa nla la wiga n or Sa ngguniang Panlungsod, Sangguniang Bayan; a Representa tive from the Priva te Sector or non-governmental orga niza tions involved in hea lth services; a nd a Representa tive of the Depa rtment of Hea lth in the LGU, a s members

3. LHB Performance is “Good” if the LHB was able to propose to the sanggunian annual budgetary appropriations for the operation and maintenance of health facilities and services within the LGU, and able to provide advice to the sa nggunia n on hea lth ma tters such as the necessity for, and application of, local appropriations for publ ic health purposes. LHB Performa nce is “Somewha t Good” i f a t lea st one of the functions mentioned above is not performed. LHB Performance is “Poor” if none of the functions mentioned a bove i s performed.

2. On Quality of Primary Health Care (basic curative service).

2.1 Ba sic medical supplies and equipment

Complete and Functional Some are available and functional but some are not None at all

2.2 Ba sic medicines

Always available Ava ilable most of the time Not available most of the time None at all

2.3 Health referral system is established Yes No

2.4 The facility is always clean and maintained Yes No

2.5 Physician or a medical staff Regularly stationed as scheduled Most of the time available Most of the time not available No physician or medical staff stationed

69



2.6 Pa tients recording system is established Yes No

3. On Quality of maternal care.

3.1 Sa fe motherhood and family planning consultation Regularly available as scheduled Sometimes not available Not available at all

3.2 Pre-natal check-up, including tetanus toxoid vaccination to pregnant women Regularly available Sometimes not available Not available at all

3.3 Breast feeding campaign is supported. Pregnant women are educated with the importa nce of brea st feeding, especia l ly within 1 hour a fter bi rth

Yes No

3.4 Post-partum care or check-up after delivery Regularly available Sometimes not available Not available at all

4. On Quality of child care.

4.1 Regular check up for children is available Yes No

4.2 OPV3, DPT3, Hep B3 and Measles vaccination to infants before 12 months of age is ensured

Yes No

4.3 Progra m to counter malnutrition is undertaken Yes No

4.4 Ba sic dental or oral health care services are avai la ble (fi l l ing, extra ction a nd clea ning, a nd proper ora l hea lth ca re informa tion)

Yes No

4.5 Information on proper child care is disseminated through various means, e.g. poster, brochure, consultation, forum, etc.

Yes No

70



5. On Other Innovative Health Services.

5.1 Conduct regular medical missions in partnership with a non-governmental organization or with the private sector

Yes No

5.2 Provide Phil-health Cards to poor families Yes No

Performance Area: Social Governance Service Area: Support to Education Services Instruction: Your answers to questions below determine your LGU performance in supporting the

national government in providing education services. Take note that this is a self-assessment tool. Please answer all items.

1. On LSB functionality. Is the Local School Board (LSB) organized?

Yes No

If Yes, determine the functionality of the LSB based on composition, meetings, and performance.

On composition:

1.1 Is the LSB composition in accordance to the LG Code?

Yes Pa rtial No

On meetings:

1.2 Does the LSB meet at least once a month, or as often as necessary?

Yes No



1.5 On performance:

Good Somewhat Good Poor

71



Notes: 1. LSB is organized when there is an executive or legislative issuance for that matter. 2. LSB composition is based on Sec. 98 of LG Code of 1991 or Section 94 of the LG

Code of ARMM. The local school board shall be composed of the Governor or Ci ty Ma yor or Municipal Mayor, as the case maybe, and the division superintendent or ci ty superintendent or district supervisor of schools a s co -cha irmen; the chairman of the education committee of the Sa nggunia ng Pa nla la wiga n or Sa ngguniang Panlungsod or Sangguniangbayan, the provincial or city or municipal treasurer, the representative of the pederasyon ng mga Sangguniang Kabataan in the Sanggunian, the duly elected president of the federation of parents-teachers a ssociations, the duly elected representative of the teachers' organizations, a nd the duly elected representative of the non-academic personnel of public schools in the LGU, a s members.

3. LSB Performance is “Good” if the LSB wa s a ble to: (1) determine the a nnua l

supplementary budgetary needs and cost for the operation and maintena nce of public schools, which shall be reflected in the form of an a nnua l school boa rd budget; (2) ensure that the disbursement of funds from the Specia l Educa tion Fund is in accordance with the prepared budget and consistent with the existing rules and regulations; and (3) provide advice to the Sanggunian on educa tiona l ma tters such as the necessi ty for, a nd the uses of loca l a ppropria tions for educational purposes. LSB Performance is “Somewhat Good” if at least one of the functions mentioned above is not exercised. LSB Performance is “Poor” if none of the functions mentioned a bove is exercised.

2. On support to elementary and seconda ry educa tion from the Specia l Educa tion Fund.

Determine which of the following services is extended by your LGU in support of elementary a nd secondary education which are funded out of Special Education Fund per Sections 100 a nd 272 of the LGC of 1991, a nd Art. 363 of the IRR of the LGC.

2.1 Construction, repair or maintenance of school buildings, facilities and equipment

of publ ic e lementa ry a nd seconda ry schools Yes No

2.2 Educational research Yes

No

2.3 Purchase of books and periodicals Yes No

2.4 Establishment or maintenance of extension classes, to include hiring of extension tea chers, where necessa ry

Yes No

2.5 Sports development Yes No

72



3. On support to basic education from the General Fund. Determine which of the fol lowing services is extended by your LGU in support of education which a re funded out of the Genera l Fund.

3.1 Implementation of a scholarship program

Yes No

3.2 Ma intenance of a public library Yes No

3.3 Construction of extension classroom Yes No

3.4 Hiring of extension class teachers Yes No

4. On the Alternative Learning System. Does your LGU implement an Alterna tive Lea rning System?

Yes No If Yes, determine the quality of the Alternative Learning System (ALS), using

the fol lowing cri teria :

4.1 The ALS focuses on functional literacy and skills training of target beneficia ries Yes No

4.2 The ALS promotes gender sensitivity, equality and development

Yes No

4.3 Resources, including staff and funds, are available Yes Pa rtial No

4.4 Ta rget beneficiaries are aware of the alternative learning system Yes Pa rtial No

4.5 Pra ctical skills gained from the system are known to be applied by many of the beneficiaries

Yes No

73



Notes:

1. On 4.3, “Pa rtial” means there are resources available but not sufficient.

2. On 4.4, “Pa rtial” means not al l of the ta rget beneficia ries a re a wa re of the a l terna tive lea rning system.

Performance Area: Social Governance Service Area: Support to Housing and Basic Utilities Instruction: Your answers to questions below determine your LGU performa nce in a ssisting the

na tional government to address the need of the poor for decent dwel l ing, a nd in providing access to basic utilities. Take note that this is a self-assessment tool . Plea se a nswer a l l i tems.

1. Does your LGU maintain a database for the housing sector?

Yes No

If Yes, does the database contain:

1.1 updated inventory of informal settlers

Yes No

1.2 updated inventory of makeshift houses Yes No

1.3 Sites for potential socialized housing Yes No

1.4 updated inventory of households with access to water supply Yes No

1.5 updated inventory of household with access to electricity Yes No

Notes:

1. There are 3 levels. Level 1 –artesian well. Level 2 – artesian well but communal in use. Level 3 - piped water system, communal

74



2. Determine the types of services provided for the housing sector

2.1 Donation of lots for socialized housing Yes No

2.2 Provision of socialized housing or mass dwelling Yes No

Performance Area: Social Governance Service Area: Peace, Security and Disaster Risk Management Instruction: Your answers to questions below determine your LGU performance in pea ce, securi ty

a nd disaster risk management. Take note that this is a self-assessment tool . Plea se a nswer a l l i tems. You ma y skip a n i tem only i f speci fied.

1. On Peace and Security

On POC functionality. Is the Peace and Order Council (POC) organized?

Yes No

If Yes, determine the functionality of the POC based on composition, meetings, and performance. On composition:

1.1 Is the POC composition in accordance with Section 1 of Executive Order No. 773,

2009 Yes Pa rtial No

On meetings:

1.2 Does the POC meet as often as necessary? Yes No



75




Notes:

1. POC is organized when there is a n executive or legisla tive i ssua nce for tha t

ma tter. 2. POC composition: The Local Peace and Order Council shall be composed of the

LGU counterparts of the departments, offices and agencies a s enumera ted in pa ragraph (a) of E.O. 773, wherever applicable, with the Governor or Ma yor, a s the case maybe, as Chairman and the respective Vice Governor or Vice-mayor a s Vice-Chairman. In addition, there shall be one representative of the Sa nggunia n to be chosen by it from among its members. The Governor a s Cha irma n of the PPOC shall appoint the three (3) representa tives of the priva te sector, upon consultation with the members of the Counci l a nd with the a pprova l of the Comma nder of the Infantry Division and the Regiona l Director of the PNP. The provincial counterpart of the CSAFP shall be the Brigade Comma nder or, in the ca se of Palawan, the Comma nder of the Western Comma nd. Depa rtments, Offices and agencies with no provincial and/or field offices sha l l not si t in the PPOC.

The Ci ty Mayor or Municipal Mayor, as the case maybe, as chairman of the CPOC or MCOP shall appoint the three (3) representatives from the private sector, upon consultation with the members of the Council and upon acquiring a ppropria te Security clearances. Departments, offices and agencies with no city, municipa l i ty a nd/or fie ld offices sha l l not si t in the CPOC or MPOC.

3. POC Performance is “Good” if the POC was able to: (1) formulate, or upda te, the

Integrated Area Community Public Safety Plan which contains measures aimed at improving peace and order and public safety in the loca l government unit, (2) monitor the implementation of pea ce a nd order progra ms, a nd to a ddress problems, i f a ny, through a ction of i ts own or a ction of other competent a uthorities made possible through an effective referral system, or (3) undertake a periodic assessment of the prevailing pea ce a nd order si tua tion inthe loca l government unit. POC Performance is “Somewhat Good” if a t lea st one of the functions mentioned above is not exercised. POC Performance is “Poor” i f none of the functions mentioned a bove is exercised.

2. On the Quality of the Integrated Area Community Public Safety Plan. Does your LGU ha ve

a n Integra ted Area Community Publ ic Sa fety Pla n? Yes No

If Yes, determine the qua l i ty of the Pla n using the fol lowing cri teria :

76



2.1 Pa rticipatory in its formulation Yes Pa rtial No

2.2 Needs-based priority project(s) to enhance peace and order and public safety are integra l components of the Pla n

Yes Pa rtial No

2.3 Financing is an integral component of the Plan Yes Pa rtial No

2.4 M&E is an integral component of the Plan Yes No

2.5 Updated annually

Yes No

Notes:

1 “Pa rtial” means not all identified stakeholders participated in the formulation of the Plan.

2 “Pa rtial” means that not all priority needs in enhancing peace and order and public

sa fety are incorporated in the Plan

3 “Pa rtial” means that not all identified projects are backed up with funding support.

3. On the quality of accomplishments. Determine the quality of accomplishments using the fol lowing cri teria :

3.1 On the focus – projects implemented a re consistent with priori ty project(s)

embodied in the Pla n Yes Pa rtial No

3.2 On the result(s) – demonstrable and quantifiable reduction in the incidence of

crimes as compared to the previous yea r, e .g., reduced incidence of drug a buse, reduced incidence of i l lega l ga mbl ing, etc.

Incidence of crime reduced compared to last year

Incidence of crime increased compared to last year

77



4. On the provision of sites for protective services. Does your city or municipal government provide si tes for the fol lowing?

4.1 Pol ice Station(s)

Yes No

4.2 Fi re Station(s)

Yes No

4.3 City/Municipal Jail

Yes No

5. On Child Protection

On LCPC functionality. Is the Local Council for the Protection of Chi ldren orga nized? Yes No

If Yes, determine the functionality of the LCPC based on composition, meetings, and

performance.

On composition:

5.1 Is the LCPC composition in accordance with DILG Memorandum Circular No. 2002-121, s. 20022?

Yes Pa rtial No

On meetings:

5.2 Does the LCPC meet as often as necessary?

Yes No



78



On Performance:

5.5 The Local Council for the Protection of Children is able to cause for the approva l of alegislation on child survival, protection,participation and development, for the inclusion in the local annual appropria tion funds to support efforts to promote child survival, protection, participation and development, and is able to a ssist chi ldren in need of specia l protection.

Yes No

Notes:

1. LCPC is organized when there is an executive or legislative issuance for that ma tter.

2. LCPC composition: Ci ty Ma yor a s Cha ir. Members – Sa nggunia n member,

chairperson on the Committee on Women and Family; DILG City Fie ld Officer, Division Superintendent/District Supervisor, DepEd; Loca l La bor a nd Employment Officer; Local Planning and Development Officer; Budget Officer; Health Officer; Social Welfare and Development Officer; Nutrition Officer; Chief of Police; Treasurer; Ligangmga Barangay President; SK Federa tion President; Pa rent-Teacher Association (PTA) president; Child Representa tive; a t lea st (3) representa tives of non-government orga niza tions, two (2) of whom a re a ppointed by the Committee ha ndl ing Ea rly Chi ldhood a nd Development Progra ms and (1) from the trade/labor union sector. The Mayor may designa te a ny of the members a s co-cha ir.

6. On Ka tarungang Pambarangay

Adequacy of financial support to the Lupon Ta ga pa ma ya pa . Does your ci ty or municipa l government provide a ppropria tions for the implementa tion of the Ka ta runga ngPa mba ra nga y?

Yes No

If yes, determine whether your city or municipal government provides a dequa te financial support in the implementation of the katarungang pambarangay, using the criteria below:

6.1 Does the appropriation include financial benefits of the Lupon (e.g., allowances,

insurance coverage, etc.)? Yes No

6.2 Does the appropriation provide for the Ma intena nce a nd Other Opera ting Expenses (e.g. supplies, electrical consumption, office renta l , tra nsporta tion cost)?

Yes No

79



6.3 Does the appropriation provide funding for the conduct of continuing education for the Lupon members? Yes No

6.4 Does the appropriation cover expenses for capital outlays (e .g., office fixtures, tra nsporta tion service, etc.)?

Yes No

Notes:

1. Section 422 of the LG Code of 1991 ma nda tes tha t the ci ty or municipa l government shall provide appropriations for the effective implementation of the Ka ta runga ngPa mba ra nga y.

7. On the quantity of disputes resolved. What is the percentage of interpersona l disputes

resolved through the LupongTa ga pa ma ya pa ? 80 % or more 51-79 % 50% or below

Notes:

1. To compute, (total number of interpersonal disputes resolved through a l l the

LupongTagapamayapa ÷ total number of interpersonal disputes brought to a l l LupongTa ga pa ma ya pa for resolution) x 100.

8. On the quality of settlements. Describe the extent of amica ble settlements susta ined

under the Ka ta ra nga ngPa mba ra nga y. 98% to 100% of cases resolved were sustained or not repudiated 50-97% of ca ses resolved were sustained or not repudiated Below 50% of cases resolved were repudiated

Notes:

1. To compute, (total number of disputes resolved without repudia tion ÷ tota l number of disputes resolved) x 100

2. Section 418 of the LG Code states that: “Any party to the dispute may, within ten

(10) da ys from the date of the settlement, repudiate the same by filing with the lupon chairman a statement to tha t effect sworn to before h im, where the consent is vitiated by fraud, violence, or ntimidation. Such repudiation sha l l be sufficient basis for the issua nce of a certi fica tion for fi l ing a compla int.”

80



9. On Disaster Risk Management On the LDCC Functionality. Is the Local Disaster Coordina ting Counci l (LDCC) orga nized?

Yes No

If Yes, determine the functionality of the LDCC using the criteria below:

On organization and composition:

9.1 Is the LDCC composition in accordance with Presidential Decree No. 1566, s. 1978?

Yes Pa rtial No

9.2 Are support groups and community volunteers organized? Yes No

On meetings:

9.3 Does the LDCC meet as often as necessary? Yes No



On program, budgetary support and other management tools:

9.6 Is the LDCC a ble to integrate Disaster Risk Management in the Comprehensive Development Pla n, Loca l Development Investment Pla n a nd Annua l Investment Progra m?

Yes No

9.7 Is the LDCC a ble to formulate an Operations Manual, incorporating therein a communications strategy and M&E?

Yes No

81



Notes: 1. LDCC Composition: Governor or Ci ty Ma yor or Municipa l Ma yor, a s the ca se

ma ybe, as Chairman. The Provincial Director or the Ci ty Director, or the Chief of Pol ice of the Philippine National Police shall be the Vice-Cha irma n. Al l orga nic local officials, as well as national officia ls working a t the Provincia l or ci ty or municipal level, as members. The Provincial or City or Municipa l Civi l Defense Deputized Coordinators shall act as action officer of the counci l . (Section 4, PD 1566, s. of 1978)

10. LGU Disaster Preparedness.

10.1 Existence and ease of mobilizing the Local Disaster Coordinating Council and Disaster Action Team(s). Yes No

10.2 Ava ilability of evacuation center(s). Yes No

10.3 Ava ilability of appropriate equipage, including the adequacy thereof. Yes No

10.4 Ava ilability and ease of distribution relief of goods. Yes No

10.5 Ea se of mobilizing medical and counseling services. Yes

No

10.6 Ava ilability of an operational community-based disaster early warning system. Yes No

10.7 Ea se in realigning the budget for the purchase of supplies and materials or the pa yment of services which a re exceptiona l ly urgent or a bsolutely indispensable to prevent imminent danger to, or loss of, life or property, in the event the 5% Ca la mity Fund is exha usted. Yes No

10.8 Quality of the Disaster Risk Management Plan. Yes No

82



Notes:

10.1 This factor presumes that beyond organizing, the members of the LDCC a nd Action Team(s) have undergone disaster preparedness-related semina rs or tra ining.

10.2 It i s desired that the evacuation center(s) is (are) pre-designated instead of such

being designated only during the occurrence of a disaster or a cala mity, a nd ma de known to vulnera ble groups in the community.

10.3 It i s presumed that equipment appropriate for a type of disa ster a re rea di ly

a vailable and personnel a ssigned to use such equipment a re tra ined. 10.4 This means stock piling of basic necessities such a s food, medica l suppl ies,

blankets, etc., or at the minimum access to such relief goods is immedia te, a nd that there is a distribution scheme to effectively reach out to disa ster-a ffected groups.

10.5 This presumes that appropriate medical personnel, including equipment a nd

suppl ies a re rea di ly a va i la ble for mobi l i za tion. 10.6 This factor calls for a reliable early warning system, and manned especia l ly so

when the si tua tion dema nds for i t. 10.7 In the event the 5\% Calamity Fund is exhausted, ease in realigning the budget

for the purchase of supplies and materials or the payment of services which a re exceptionally urgent or absolutely indispensa ble to prevent imminent da nger to, or loss of, l i fe or property i s desired.

10.8 It i s presumed that the plan, at the minimum, contains information: (a) on risk

a reas ba sed from ha za rd ma ps, e .g., storm surge ha za rd ma p, flood/ flashflood hazard map, and rain-induced landslide susceptibility ma p, (b) on vulnerable groups, (c) on strategies in mitigation, response and rehabilitation. It i s assumed that the risk areas, which are embodied in the Disa ster Risk Ma nagement Plan, are derived from the Comprehensive La nd Use Pla n or Provincial Development and Physical Framework Plan, with the latter ha ving been ena cted through a n ordina nce.

11. On adequacy of services to disaster victims. Ha s there been a disa ster or ca la mity occurred in your loca l i ty during this profi le yea r (2011)?

Yes No If yes, determine the adequacy of services provided for disaster victims

using the criteria below:

11.1 sufficient evacuation centers for all the victims Yes No

83



11.2 sufficient relief goods and services for all the victims Yes

No

11.3 sufficient first aid and medical services Yes No

12. On rehabilitation effort. Has there been a disaster or calamity occurred in your loca l i ty during this profi le yea r?

Yes No

If yes, the LGU was able to: 12.1 Determine the nature and extent of rehabil i ta tion effort to be underta ken

Yes No

12.2 rehabilitate disaster or calamity damages Yes Pa rtial No

Notes:

5. “Partial” means not all were rehabilitated.

84



STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE PERFORMANCE (ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE)

Performance Area: Economic Governance Service Area: Support to Agriculture Sector Instruction: Your answers to the questions below determine your LGU performa nce in providing

support to farmers and to the agriculture sector in general. This form is a ppl ica ble to LGUs with agricultural ecosystem only. Take note that this is a se l f-a ssessment tool . Plea se a nswer a l l i tems.

1. On support to agriculture. Determine the level of support to agriculture using the criteria below.

On infrastructure support:

1.1 Rehabili ta tion or construction of i rriga tion system for i rriga ted or i rriga ble a rea s. Full High Low None NA

1.2 Provision of post-harvest equipment, machines or facilities, i.e. threshers, harvesters, driers mi l l ing ma chines, stora ge, etc.

Full High Low None NA

1.3 Rehabilitation or construction of feeder roads or farm-to-market roads. Full High Low None NA

On local government agricultural extension and on-site research services or facilities: 1.4 Credit facilitation services (non-collateral ized loa ns to poor fa rmers, i .e . loa n a ccess,

insurance and credit guarantees through cooperatives or other fina ncing insti tutions. Full High Low None

85



1.5 Production support services, i.e. planting materials, fertilizers and other soil ameliorants, or la bora tory services such a s soi l testing a nd simi la r services.

Full High Low None

1.6 Research and development services, i.e. assistance to research projects, and techno demo coopera tors.

Full High Low None

1.7 Ma rket development services, i.e., trade fairs, exhibits, missions and congresses. Full High Low None

Notes:

1. Answer “Ful l” i f the support i s ful ly provided a nd funded by the LGU. 2. Answer “High” if the support is provided and funded by the LGU, Provincial Government,

Department of Agriculture, farmers, and/or other donor agencies through a cost-sharing scheme.

3. Answer “Low” if the LGU only pla ys a coordina tive function of the Depa rtment of

Agriculture, and/or other donor agencies, and that there are no funds provided by the LGU.

4. Answer “None” if there is a need or demand for such service or agricultural support but i s

not provided by the LGU due to fina ncia l or technica l constra ints. 5. NA i f the rehabilitation or construction of infrastructure support is not a ppl ica ble , e .g.,

a gricultural land is not an irrigable land in the case of the provision of irrigation system, or not yet needed since there is al rea dy a complete a nd functiona l infra structure support.

2. On the extent of farming household-beneficiaries. Determine the extent of farming households

benefiting from agricultura l extension a nd on-si te resea rch services or fa ci l i ties, in %. 80% or more 50 - 79% Below 50%

86



Notes:

1. To compute, (number of farming households availing of agricultural extension and on-site research services or facilities ÷ total number of fa rming households) x 100.

3. On a lternative and innovative assista nce to fa rmers. Does your LGU ha ve a n a l terna tive or

innova tive a ssista nce to fa rmers? Yes No

If yes, give the title of the said program or project.

Program/Project Title: Performance Area: Economic Governance Service Area: Entrepreneurship, Business and Industry Promotion Instruction: Your a nswers to questions below determine your LGU performa nce on

entrepreneurship, business and industry promotion. Ta ke note tha t this i s a se l f-a ssessment tool . Plea se a nswer a l l i tems.

1. On Promoting a Business-Friendly Environment

Determine the quality of the civil application system of the LGU to the business sector using the following criteria:

1.1 Permitting procedure

Computerized Computer-Aided Ma nual

1.2 Procedure in securing permits is made known to clients (either through website, posters or other mea ns.)

Yes No

1.3 Procedure is clea r (i .e ., step or steps, processing time, processing fee, tra nsa ction hour, etc.) Yes No

* Organic farming, Vermi-cast production, Integrated Pest Management * Provision of Organic Fertilizer * Bio-N and Bio-Con to reduce usage of inorganic fertilizer * Production of biological agents to control pest incidents

87



1.4 Processing of a Building Permit requires, at most, 5 documentary requirements, 5 steps, a nd 5 signa tories

Yes No

1.5 Processing of a n Occupa ncy Permit requires, a t most, 3 documenta ry requirements, 2 steps, a nd 5 signa tories Yes No

1.6 Processing of a Business Permit requires, at most, 6 documentary requirements, 6 steps, a nd 5 signa tories.

Yes No

1.7 Ha s a One-Stop-Shop in the processing of permits Yes No

1.8 Ha s a Customer Assistance Desk tha t a ttends to inquiries or compla ints of business- cl ienteles

Yes No

Notes:

1. Reference: Anti-Red Tape Act of 2007 a nd DILG Memorandum Circular Nos.

2004-50 a nd 2004-65. 2. On the Promotion of Businesses, Enterprises and Industries

Determine the processing time of a building permit, an occupancy permit, and a business permit.

2.1 Building Permit

Less than 4 hours 4 – 8 hours More than 8 hours

2.2 Occupancy Permit Less than 4 hours 4 – 8 hours More than 8 hours

2.3 Business Permit Less than 15 minutes 15 – 30 mins. More than 30 minutes

88



3. Is there a local government-supported administrative body tha t i s responsible in the promotion of business a nd industry in the LGU?

Yes No

4. Determine the quality of direct support services to businesses, enterprises and industries, using the cri teria below:

4.1 Provision of tax incentive

Yes No

4.2 Assistance in product labeling especially for small and medium enterprises Yes No

4.3 Assists in product packaging especially for small and medium enterprises Yes No

4.4 Tra ining of business-employed personnel or private sector employees Yes No

4.5 Ma intenance of industrial peace

Yes No

4.6 Support to job fairs Yes No

89



STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE PERFORMANCE ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE

Performance Area: Environmental Governance Service Area: Forest Ecosystems Management Instruction: Your answers to the questions below determine your LGU performa nce in forest

ecosystem ma na gement. Ta ke note tha t this i s a se l f-a ssessment tool .

1. Is the Forest Management program integrated in the Comprehensive Development Pla n or in the Provincia l Development Physica l Fra mework Pla n?

Yes No

2. Are NGOs, Peoples’ organizations, the private sector or the general public involved in the protection a nd ma na gement of forest?

Yes No

3. Determine the adequacy of forest management efforts using the following criteria 3.1 Efforts are deliberate - initiated and carefully planned by the LGU

Yes No

3.2 Area-targets are set Yes No

3.3 Area-targets are reforested Yes No

3.4 Area-targets are protected Yes No

Performance Area: Environmental Governance Service Area: Freshwater Ecosystems Management Instruction: Your answers to the questions below determine your LGU performa nce in freshwa ter


1. Is the freshwater protection or rehabilitation program integrated in the Comprehensive Development Pla n or Provincia l Development Physica l Fra mework Pla n?

Yes No

90



2. Are non-government organizations, people’s orga niza tions, the priva te sector or the general public involved in the protection or rehabilita tion of freshwa ter, i .e . river or la ke?

Yes No

3. Determine the a dequa cy of freshwa ter ecosystem ma na gement efforts using the fol lowing cri teria

3.1 Efforts are deliberate - initiated and carefully planned by the LGU

Yes No


3.3 Area-targets are rehabilitated Yes No

3.4 Area-targets are protected Yes No

Performance Area: Environmental Governance Service Area: Urban Ecosystems Management Instruction: Your answers to the questions below determine your LGU performa nce in urba n


1. Is the pollution control program integrated in the Comprehensive Development Pla n or Provincia l Development Physica l Fra mework Pla n?

Yes No

2. Are non-government organizations, people’s orga niza tions, the priva te sector or the general public involved in the protection of the environment from air or water pollution ecosystem?

Yes No

Notes:

1. This mean participation in urban space greening - tree parks, Greenbelts, a nd in ca lling the attention of local authorities on signs of pol lution, pol luta nts or pol luting enti ties.

91



3. Determine the adequacy of efforts to enforce pollution control measures using the criteria below:

3.1 Efforts are deliberate - initiated and carefully planned by the LGU

Yes No


3.3 Area-targets are protected from pollution Yes No

3. On Solid Waste Management, On SWMB Functionality. Is the Solid Waste Ma na gement Boa rd (SWMB)orga nized?

Yes No

If Yes, determine the functionality of SWMB based on composition, meetings, and performance.

On composition:

4.1 Is the SWMB composition in accordance with Sections 11 a nd 12 of Republic Act

No. 9003? Yes Pa rtial No

On meetings: 4.2 Does the SWMB meet as often as necessary?

Yes No




92



Notes:

1. SWMB composition: The Provincial or Ci ty or Municipal Solid Waste Management Boa rd shall be composed of the Governor or Ci ty or Municipal Mayor, as the ca se ma ybe, a s Hea d with the fol lowing a s members: a ) One (1) representa tive of the Sa ngguniangPanlalawigan or Sa nggunia ngPa nlungsod or the Sa nggunia ng Ba ya n, preferably chairpersons of either the Committees on Environment or Health, who will be designated by the presiding officer; b) President of the Association of Barangay Councils in the municipality or city; c) Chairperson of the SangguniangKabataan Federation; d) A Representative from NGOs whose principal purpose is to promote recycl ing a nd the protection of air and water quality; e) A Representative from the recycling industry; f) A Representative from the manufacturing or packaging industry; and g) A Representa tive of each concerned government agency possessing releva nt technica l a nd ma rketing expertise a s ma y be determined by the Boa rd.

2. Pa rtial means Yes but not all. 3. On performance: Answer “Good” i f a l l the fol lowing functions a re performed: (a )

formulate a 10-year SWM Plan and approved by the National Solid Waste Management Commission; (b) develop speci fic mechanics and guidelines for the implementation of the SWM Pla n; (c) coordina te the efforts of i ts component ba ra nga y in theimplementation of the SWM Plan; (d) recommend measures and safeguards aga inst pollution and for the preservation of the natura l ecosystem; (e) a dopt mea sures to promote and ensure the viability and effective implementa tion of SWM Progra ms in component ba ra nga ys; (f) review the SWM Pla n for purposes of ensuring i ts sustainability, viability, effectiveness and relevance in relation to local and internationa l developments in the field of solid wa ste ma na gement; (g) a dopt sp eci fic revenue generating measures to promote the viability of the SWM Plan; (h) recommend to loca l a uthorities measures for franchise or BOT agreements with recognized insti tutions, to provide either exclusive or non-exclusive authority for the collection, transfer, stora ge, processing, recycling or disposal of solid waste; (i) monitor the implementa tion of the SWM Plan in cooperation with the private sector and NGOs. Answer “Somewhat Good” i f any of those functions is not performed. Answer “Poor” if none of those functions i s performed.

5. Does your LGU have a Solid Waste Management Plan?

Yes No

If Yes, determine the quality of the Plan using the following criteria: 5.1 Pa rticipatory in its formulation

Yes Pa rtial No

93



5.2 Wa ste characterization, source reduction, col lection a nd tra nsfer, source reduction, recycling, composting, collection and transfer, solid waste disposa l , educa tion a nd publ ic informa tion, a nd incentive scheme a re integra l components of the Pla n

Yes Pa rtial No

5.3 Financing is an integral component of the Plan Yes No

5.4 M&E is an integral component of the Plan Yes No

5.5 Updated every 2 years Yes No

Notes: If Yes, determine the quality of the Plan using the following criteria:

6. Determine the percentage of barangays with material recovery facilities. Al l or 100%

75% - 99% 50% - 74% 25% - 49% 0 - 25%

7. On Solid Waste Collection and Disposal.

Determine the effectiveness of sol id wa ste col lection a nd disposa l using the fol lowing cri teria :

Is solid waste collection done on time or as scheduled?

Al l the time Most of the time Sometime Never on time No collection

8. Which of these facilities is/are the final disposal of solid wastes? Sa nitary Landfill Sa nitary Landfill and Controlled Dumpsite Controlled Dumpsite Controlled Dumpsite and Open Dumpsite Open Dumpsite

94



STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE PERFORMANCE

(VALUING GOVERNANCE) Performance Area : Valuing Fundamentals of Governance Service Area : Participation Instruction: Your answers to questions below determine the extent of NGO, PO, Priva te Sector

ci tizen- participation in local governance. Take note that this is a self-assessment tool . 1. Are the NGOs, People’s Organizations and/or Private Sector represented in the fol lowing Loca l

Specia l Bodies? 1.1 Local Development Council

Yes Pa rtial No 1.2 Local Health Board Yes No 1.3 Local School Board

Yes Pa rtial No

1.4. Pea ce and Order Council Yes Pa rtial No

Notes: 1. The LDC composition shall include representatives of NGOs opera ting in theprovince, ci ty or

municipality,which shall not be less than one-fourth (1/4) of the members of the fully organized council (Sec. 107, LGC). Answer “Yes” if the expected number of NGO representa tion is met; “Pa rtia l” i f there is an NGO representation but did not meet the required number of NGOs; or “No” i f there is no NGO rep resenta tion in the LDC.

2. The LHB composition shall include representatives of a private sector or NGO involved in hea lth

services (Sec. 102, LGC). Answer “Yes” if there is a private sector or NGO representation, or “No” i f there is none.

3. The LSB composition shall include: (1) duly elected president of the provincial , ci ty or municipa l

federation of parents-teachers associations, (2) duly elected representa tive of the tea chers' organizations in the province, city or municipality, and (3) duly elected representa tive of the non-academic personnel of public schools in the province, ci ty or municipa l i ty (Sec. 98, LGC). Answer “Yes” i f the three sectors or orga niza tions a re represented;

“Pa rtia l” i f a t lea st one of the sector or orga niza tion is represented; or “No” i f none of the three mentioned a bove is represented in the LSB.

95



4. The POC composition shall include three (3) representatives from the private sector – (Executive Order No. 773 s. 2009). Answer “Yes” if POC has three representatives from the priva te sector, “Pa rtial” if POC has one or two representatives from the private sector, or “No” i f the POC ha s no representa tion from the priva te sector.

2. Wa s your LGU able to set up a feedback mechanism to generate citizens’ views on the reach and

quality of your LGU’s services? Yes No

Notes:

1. Generating citizens’ feedbacks can be done through the installation of suggestion boxes

located strategically within the provincial capitol, the city or municipal ha l l , or through the conduct of Citizens’ Satisfaction Survey, either through website, house-to-house or key informa nts’ surveys or a ssembl ies.

3. Are NGOs, POs or the Private Sector involved in the implementation of LGU development projects

(especia l ly those tha t a re funded out of the 20% component of IRA)? Yes No

If yes, what was the extent of involvement of NGOs, POs or the priva te sector? More than 70% of the LGU development projects were implemented in partnership with NGOs, POs a nd the priva te sector 50 - 70% of the LGU development projects were implemented in pa rtnership with NGOs, POs a nd the priva te sector Be low 50% of the LGU development projects were implemented in partnership with NGOs, POs a nd the priva te sector

Notes:

1. To determine your a nswer, get the number of loca l government projects implemented in partnership with non-governmenta l orga niza tions, people’s organizations or private sector, whether in the planning, a ctua l implementa tion, monitoring, or evaluation stage of such projects, divide with the tota l number of local government projects especially those funded out of the 20\% component of the Interna l Revenue Al l otment, then multiply by 100.

96



Performance Area: Valuing Fundamentals of Governance Service Area: Transparency Instruction: Instruction: Your a nswers to questions below determine how your LGU va lues

tra nsparency, or in ensuring tha t informa tion a re a va i la ble a nd a ccessible to the public. Take note that this is a self-assessment tool .

1. Is a Public Information Office or Desk present in your LGU?

Yes No

Notes:

1. A Public Information Office or Desk should be able to provide immediate action, such a s referrals, or basic information in response to requests or inquiries of LGU cl ients (whether walk-in or through other means of communication). If this condition is n ot met, a nswer “No”.

2. Wa s your LGU able to communicate to the public updated information about your LGU’s

services, pla ns, progra ms a nd specia l events through?

2.1 a ssemblies or other forums Yes Pa rtial No

2.2 bulletin board or performance billboard Yes Pa rtial No

2.3 newsletter, flyer or brochure Yes Pa rtial No

2.4 website Yes Pa rtial No

2.5 broadcast media Yes Pa rtial No

97



Notes:

1. Yes, i f all updated information about: (1) local government pla ns such a s Publ ic Sa fety Pla n, CLUP, Health Plan, Development Plan and AIP, among others; (2) local government programs which include training or capacity building, resource genera tion progra m, tra ffic control program, employment assistance program, and day-care services, a mong others; and (3) special events such as trade fairs, investment promotion and sports fests, a mong others, a re communica ted to the publ ic through the speci fied medium.

2. Partial, i f not all updated information about local government plans, programs and special

events a re communica ted to the publ ic through the speci fied medium. 3. No, i f no information about local government plans, progra ms a nd specia l events a re

communica ted to the publ ic through the speci fied medium.

3. Are public documents such as transaction records and contracts, as appropriate, accessible to the publ ic?

Yes No

Performance Area: Valuing Fundamentals of Governance Service Area: Financial Accountability Instruction: Your answers to questions below determine whether your LGU is responsible a nd

a ccountable for all its financial transactions. Take note that this is a self-a ssessment.

1. Determine the effectiveness of your LGU’s Fina ncia l Ma na gement System, using the fol lowing cri teria :

1.1 Relevant management tools such as manuals or guidelines are available.

Yes No

1.2 Disbursements are made only for approved purposes

Yes No

1.3 Accounting records are supported by source documentation such a s ca nceled checks, pa id bi l l s, pa yrol ls, contra cts, subcontra cts a nd other fina ncia l tra nsa ction documents

Yes Pa rtial No

1.4 Accountable financial officers are known and their responsibi l i ties a re clea r. Yes Pa rtial No

98



1.5 Sa nctions for erring local government personnel regarding financial transactions a re clea r a nd enforced

Yes Pa rtial No

1.6 Information about the procedure in tra nsa cting fina ncia l ly with the loca l government is available via various media such as billboards, posters, bulletin boards, flyers, regular newsletters, Internet or publ ica tions of the loca l government

Yes Pa rtial No

1.7 Monthly financial reports are available Yes Pa rtial No

1.8 Annual financial statements are certified Yes No

1.9 Annual financial statements are submitted within 60 da ys a fter the 31st of December

Yes Pa rtial No

1.10 Summa ry of Income a nd Expenditures i s posted in a t lea st three (3) conspicuous places in the local government unit within 30 da ys from yea r-end Yes Pa rtial No

1.11 Annual Financial statements are made available upon request Yes Pa rtial No

1.12 Financial statements are published in the local media Yes No

1.13 Financial management information system is automated Yes No

99



Notes: 1. Pa rtia l mea ns yes but not to a l l 2. Certi fied financial statements have undergone the process of review, auditing and

certi fica tion by COA. 3. Guided by Section 346, LGC of 1991 4. Guided by Section 352, LGC of 1991

2. Determine the functionality of the Bids a nd Awa rds Committee, using the fol lowing

cri teria :

2.1 The composition of the Bids and Awards Committee is in accordance with Section 11 of Republic Act No. 9184, or Government Procurement Reform Act

Yes No

2.2 Procurement rules and procedure are enforced, e.g., prepa ra tion of bidding

documents, posting of invitation to bid, conduct of pre-procurement and pre-bid conference, and determination of the eligibi l i ty of prospective bidders

Yes Pa rtial No

2.3 Al l Bids and Awards Committee meetings are held at the provincia l ca pitol , or ci ty or municipa l ha l l

Yes No

2.4 Proceedings of the meetings are documented

Yes Pa rtial No

2.5 Minutes of the meetings are made available upon request Yes Pa rtial No

Notes: 1. The BAC shall have 5 but not more than 7 members. The BAC shall be composed

of one (1) representative each from the regular offices under the Office of the Loca l Chief Executive such as, but not limited to the fol lowing: Office of the Administrator, Budget Office, Legal Office, Engineering Office, General services Offices. The Chairman of the BAC shall be at least a third ra nking perma nent official of the procuring entity. The members of the BAC sha l l be personnel occupying plantilla positions of the procuring entity concerned. The loca l chief executive shall designate the members of the BAC. The memberssha l l e lect a mong themselves who shall act as the Chairman and Vice -Cha irma n. (IRR of R.A. No. 9184) 2. Pa rtia l mea ns Yes but not to a l l .

100



3. Are ca sh advances liquidated within the prescribed period?

3.1 Sa laries and wages are liquidated within 5 days after each 15 day or end of the month pa y period.

Al l the time Most of the time Se ldom

3.2 Petty operating expenses and field operating expenses are liquidated within 20 da ys after the end of the year subject to replenishment a s frequently a s necessa ry during the yea r.

Yes No

3.3 Official travels are liquidated within 60 days after return to the Philippines (for foreign travel) or 30 days upon return to permanent official station (for loca l tra vel ).

Al l the time Most of the time Se ldom

Notes: Liquidation of cash advances is guided by Commission on Audit (COA) Circula r No. 97-002 4. Ha s your LGU received a COA audit report?

Yes No

If yes, is the Status Report of the actions taken by the LGU on the COA audit findings a nd recommendations available?

Yes No No negative findings and recommendation were issued by COA

101



LGU Scorecard on Health - DCF For Component Cities and Municipalities

LGU Na me : (Ci ty Government of Malaybalay) Province Name : (Bukidnon) Region : (X) Profi le Year : 2011 Instruction: The LGU Scorecard on Health is an annual survey being conducted by the Department of

Health for purpose of identifying reform interventions on health services provided by the LGUs. The questions are clustered into the fol l owing reform pi l la rs: Service Delivery, Compliance to National Health Legislation and Standards, Health Financing, a nd Governa nce.

Please fill-up the form by putting the required da ta for numera tor, denomina tor a nd

computed value. Encircle “Not Applicable” if the indicator is not applicable to the component ci ty or municipality, or “No Data” if applicable but data is not available . Refer to the given formula per indicator to derive the computed value. Fill-up the remarks portion of ea ch indica tor when the computed va lue exceeds the a ccepta ble va lue. Note: Only the computed value will be inputted on the onl ine DCF, however, numera tor a nd denominator data sti l l needs to be suppl ied in this ma nua l DCF to fa ci l i ta te da ta review.

A. Disease Free Zone Initiatives 1) Percent Coverage of Target Population in Endemic Area(s) with Mass Treatment for Fi lariasis A. No. of persons given

Ma ss Drug Administration x 100 = B. Total population in *endemic area Notes:

Formula: A/B x 100

Endemic area may be a barangay, component city or municipality. Thus, the popula tion of the implicated barangay, component city or municipality should be used a s denomina tor

2011 Ta rget: 85% (NOH 2011) Acceptable computed value: between 40% and 100%

Remarks: no cases found

DCF for Component Cities and Municipalities – Page 1 of 12

I. Service Delivery

0

0

0

102



2.) Percent Covera ge of Ta rget Popula tion in Endemic Area (s) with Ma ss Trea tment for Schistosomia sis

A. No. of persons given

ma ss treatment x 100 = B. Total population in

*endemic area Notes:

Formula: A/B x 100

Endemic area may be a barangay, municipality or component city. Thus, the popula tion of the implicated barangay, municipality or component city should be used a s denomina tor

2011 Ta rget: 85%

Accepta ble computed va lue: between 40% a nd 100% Remarks: Ba sakan& Upper Pulangui barangays were identified as endemic areas 3.) Annual Parasite Incidence for Malaria A. No. of Malaria cases in

the population x 100 = B. Total population in *endemic area Notes:

Formula: A/B x 1000 Endemic area may be a barangay, municipality or component city. Thus, the popula tion of

the implicated barangay, municipality or component city should be used a s denomina tor

2011 Ta rget: <0.1/1000

Acceptable computed value: maximum of 0.1 per 1,000 population Remarks: There were 2 treatment cases in the Ci ty Health Office, but they are not residents

of the city. B. Intensified Disease Prevention and Control 4.) TB Ca se Detection Rate

A. No. of new smear- positive TB cases identified x 100 =

B. Estimated no. of cases for the year Notes:

Formula: A/B x 100

Number of new smear positive and relapse cases from the case finding report

Estimated number of cases for the year is taken from the NTP Registry 2011 Ta rget: 70%

Acceptable computed value: between 30% and 100% Remarks: For TB Ca se Detection Rate (2011), 136 identified new smear positive


21,944

24,079

91.13%

0

0

0

136

204

67%

103



5.) TB Cure Rate A. No. of new smear-positive

pulmonary TB cases registered in a specified period that were cured . x100 =

B. Total new smear-positive pulmonary TB cases registered

in the same period . Notes:

Formula: A/B x 100

2011 Ta rget: 85% Acceptable computed value: between 30% and 100%

Remarks: Figures above are for the year 2010. TB Cure rate 2011, ca n be computed until end

of July/August

C. Chi ld Health 6) Percentage of Fully Immunized Children

A. No. of infants given BCG, OPV3, DPT3, Hep B3 and

Mea sles vaccine before 12 months of age . x100 =

B. (Total population x 2.7%)

Notes:

Formula: A/B x 100

2011 Ta rget: 95% (NOH 2011)

Acceptable computed value: between 30% and 100%

Remarks: Percentage of Fully Immunized Children increased of .26% compared last year.


91

106

86%

4,111

4,226

97.13%

104



7) Percentage of Newborns Initiated Breastfeeding within one hour after birth A. No. of postpartum women

initiated breastfeeding within 1 hour after giving birth. x100 =

B. Total population x 3% .

Notes:

Formula: A/B x 100

FHSIS Post-Partum TCL is the source of numerator


Remarks: Sti ll below the 2011 ta rget percentage D. Ma ternal Health 8) Percentage of Facility Based Deliveries

Number of mothers giving birth at:

A1. RHU and BHS . A2. District/Municipal/

Component Ci ty Hospital (provincial, municipal or city-

ma naged) . B1. Home . Percentage of Facility Based Deliveries A. Number of facility based

deliveries (A1 + A2) . x100 = B. Number of maternal deliveries

(A1 + A2 + B1).

Notes:

Formula: A/B x 100 2011 Ta rget: 70 % (NOH 2011)


Remarks: For live births delivered at home (1,150), 32.17% were attended by trained and Untrained hilots


3,529

4,716

74.83%

1,005

1,420

1,150

2,425

3,575

67.83%

105



9) Contra ceptive Prevalence Rate A. No. of women of reproductive age

who are using (or whose partner i s using) a contraceptive method a t a given point in time . x 100=

B. No. of women of reproductive a ge at the same point in time (14.5% of total population) .

Notes:

Formula: A/B x 100

RHU should collect data from district/municipal hospital which provides family planning services (e.g. ligation, IUD insertion, etc.) in their catchment area


Remarks: Every year LGU allocates 1 million for contraceptive Self-reliance to address the unmet needs on family planning. Majority uses pills while the smallest no. of a cceptors is on vasectomy. E. Healthy Lifestyle, Health Risk Management and Advocacy 10) Percentage of Households with Access to Safe Water A. Total no. of households with

a ccess to safe water (Level I , I I, III) . x100 =

B. Total no. of households .

Notes: Formula: A/B x 100


Remarks: Sa me as last year percentage rate


7,035

22,007

32%

26,944

29,818

90.36%

106



11) Percentage of Households with Access to Sanitary Toilet Facilities A. Total no. of households with

sanitary toilet facilities x100 = B. Total no. of households .

Notes:

Formula: A/B x 100

2011 Ta rget: 91%


Remarks: Almost the same as last year’s percentage and still below 2011 ta rget.

F. Compliance to Philhealth Accreditation Standards for Health Facilities

12) Percentage of RHUs Accredited by Philhealth for OPB, MCP a nd TB-DOTS Packages

For Out-Patient Benefits (OPB): A. Number of RHUs accredited by

Phi lhealth for OPB package x100 = B. Total no. of RHUs

Notes:

Formula: A/B x 100


Remarks:

For Ma ternity Ca re Package (MCP): A. Number of RHUs accredited by

Phi lhealth for Maternity Ca re Pa cka ge X100 =

B. Total no. of RHUs Notes:

Formula: A/B x 100


Remarks: Only Barangay Health Center of barangay 10 is MCP a ccredited


25,381

29,818

85%

II. Compliance to National Health Legislation and Standards

1

1

100%

1

1

100%

107



For TB-DOTS: A. Number of RHUs accredited by

Phi lhealth for TB – DOTS X100 = B. Total no. of RHUs

Notes:

Formula: A/B x 100

2011 Ta rget: 50%


Remarks: ____________________________________________________________________

G. Improvement of Access to Low Cost Quality Drugs 13) Botikang Barangay (BnB) to Barangay Ratio

A. Number of Barangays = B. Number of Botikang

Ba rangay (BnB)

Notes:

Formula: A/B

2011 Ta rget: 1 BnB for every 3 Barangays Acceptable computed value: between 0 BnB : 1 Barangay and 1 BnB : 50 Barangays

Remarks: 1 Botika Ng Barangay for about 2 barangays which is above LGPMS ta rget

H. LGU Investment for Health 14) Percentage of Component Ci ty/Municipal Budget Allocated to Health Services

A. Component city/municipal budget allocated to health

services x100 = B. Total component

ci ty/municipal budget

2011 Ta rget: 22%

Acceptable computed value: between 5% and 50% Remarks:

A. 46,173,141.68 (AIFCS, Medicines) B. 596,390,000.00 (Total Component Ci ty budget) 2,900,000.00 (Sa nitation) 10,800,000.00 (Economic Ent. Income)

6,187,950.00 (Wa ste Management) 607,190,000.00 55,261,091.68


1

1

100%

46

28

1:2

III. Health Financing

55,263,091.68

607,190,000.00

9.10%

108



15) Percentage of MOOE to Total Component Ci ty/Municipal Health Budget A. Total MOOE in component

ci ty/municipal health budget . x100 =

B. Total city/municipal health budget .

Formula: A/B x 100

2011 Ta rget: 45%

Acceptable computed value: between 5% and 80% Remarks:

10,585,000.00 (MOOE) 25,260,034 (Personal Services) 35,845,034.00


10,585,000.00

35,845,034.00

29.53%

109



I . LGU Sectoral Management

16) Rural Health Physician to Population Ratio

A. Total population = B. No. of Rural

Health Physician

Note:

Formula: A/B x 100 RHP refers to Ci ty/Municipal Health officer, Medical Specialist & Medical

Officers

2010 Ta rget: 1 rural health physician : 20,000 population

Acceptable computed value: between 1 physician :1,000 population and 1 physician : 75,000 population

Remarks: Aside from the 4 rural health physicians in the CHO, under re-org. plantilla, 2 slots va ca nt positions are still available

17) Rural Health Midwife to Population Ratio

A. Total population = B. No. of Rural Health

Midwife

Note:

Formula: A/B x 100

2011 Ta rget: 1 midwife : 5,000 population Acceptable computed value: between 1 midwife : 500 population and

1 midwife :75,000 population

Remarks: Above 2011 ta rget


IV. GOVERNANCE

157,194

4

1:39,298.50

157,194

48

1:3,274

110



J. Internal Management

18) Percentage of Procurement Packages Completed Through Competitive Public Bidding A. Total PhP amount of

procurement packages identified for competitive public bidding that were completed through competitive public bidding x100 =

B. Total PhP amount of procurement packages identified for competitive public bidding

Note:

Formula: A/B x 100

A ra ndom sample of 3 procurement packages may be analyzed, as an a lternative to analyzing all procurement packages


Remarks: Aside from failure of bidding, some projects identified or programmed for competitive bidding were not obligated at the end of the year. Some are re- programmed as requested by the end-users.

19) Percentage of Annual Financing Utilized

A. Amount of health budget

a nd grants utilized x100 = B. Total health budget and

gra nts

Note:

Formula: A/B x 100


Remarks:

A. Health Budget & Grants Utilized B.) Total Health Budget & Grants 42,836,481.38 (Health Budget Utilized) 46,173,141.68 (Total Health Budget) 250,000 (AIFCS - Akbayan) 1,000,000.00 (AIFCS - Guingona) 974,422.33 (Phi l Health Capitation) 250,000.00 (AIFCS –Akbayan)

44,060,903.71 1,094,181.33 (Phi l Health Capitation) 48,517,323.01


175,284,881.68

177,040,077.18

99.00%

44,060,903.71

48,517,323.01

90.81%

111



20) Percentage of Audit Objections on Health Raised within the Year that have been Cleared A. Number of audit

objections on health ra ised within the year

tha t have been cleared x100 = B. Total audit objections on

health raised

Note:

Formula: A/B x 100

Acceptable computed value: between 0% and 100% Remarks: no cases found


0

0

0

112



P a rt I . On Accomplishing the DCF (for Ci ty/Municipal Health Officers & Financial Officers)

LGU Na me: City Government of Malaybalay Da te Accomplished: March 8, 2012 This is to certify that the data provided in the LGU Scoreca rd Da ta Ca pture Form a re

final and correct to the best of our knowledge. We understand that the data we provided in the LGU Scorecard Data Capture Form will be the bases in producing the LGU Report Ca rd.

SIGNED:

Note: Affix your signature above printed name. Indicate your position opposite your name. Na me Position Signature

MS. MA. RICA E. RAGURO City Health Office – Nurse IV _____________________ MS. ALTA D. CASTRO BAC Secretariat _____________________ MR. BENEDICT L. ANGCO Budget Officer IV _____________________

Pa rt I I. On Review of DCF (For the PHO)

This is to certify that the undersigned have reviewed the data provided in this LGU Scorecard

Da ta Capture Form. Remarks: For Health : _____________________________________

For BAC :______________________________________ For Budget : _____________________________________

SIGNED:

Note: Affix your signature above printed name. Indicate your position opposite your name. Na me Position Signature

DR. DENNIS P. SANGALANG Ci ty Health Officer _______________________ ENGR. BENITO O. LUGTU Ta x Ma pper IV _______________________ MS. ARLENE A. HO Budget Officer _______________________


Certification Page (for Component Cities and Municipalities)

113



Brief History

The original inhabitants of Malaybala y were sa id to ha ve come from the sea shores of

Northern Mindanao, but were driven inward by marauding pirates and the colonizing Spa nia rds. Before the final conquest of the hinterlands of Mindanao, Malaybalay together with Sumilao, Linabo, Ma ilag and Silae had been known settlements in Bukidnon. In 1850 the entire village of what is now Ka lasungay (an old settlement site of Malaybalay) was burned down during the ba ttle a ga inst the Spa nia rds. Al l ma le adults were ki lled on sight. Al l women a nd chi ldren were ta ken hosta ge. It wa s the la st recorded resista nce by the inhabitants against the conquering Ca sti l la n Army.

A few yea rs later, those who survived a nd fled to Silae slowly came back and settled near the Sacub River (now known as the Rizal Park) under the protection of Datu Mampaalong. This leader led 30 other datus on June 15, 1877 a nd a ccepts Spanish dominion and embraced Christianity. For about 356 years after the Spaniards discovered the Phi lippines, Malaybalay became a “Pueblo” with the name “Oroquita del Interior” with a terri tory covering the land area of what is now the entire Province of Bukidnon, but the origina l na me of Ma laybalay remained. From 1877 until the end of the Spanish rule in the islands, which covered a period of 20 years, Capitanes who were appointed from among the acknowledged tribal chiefta ins governed Malaybalay. They were Mariano Melendez (Datu Mampaalong), Doroteo Melendez, Jua n Ca rba ja l , Ale ja ndro Bonta o, Esteba n Ti la nduca a nd Fa ustino Abel lo.

With the creation of the Province of Bukidnon by the America n Mi l i ta ry Government,

Ma laybalay became its capital town with a reduced territory. The municipalities of Va lenci a , Sa n Fernando, Lantapan and Cabanglasan were still part of Malaybalay until the mid-60s a nd 70s when they were created as separate municipa l i ties. The fol lowing served a s Ma yors of the town:

114



Commonwealth Period:

NAMES YEAR IN SERVICE

Juan Melendez 1906-1908

Fernando Damasco 1909-1913 Jose Ruiz 1914-1918

Juan Melendez 1924-1936 Fa ustino Caterial A.K.A. Amay Sumalindong 1936-1937 Ca talino Damasco1 1937-1939 Gerardo Pimentel2

Sa lvador Alberto3 1940-1941 1943-1947

After Independence:

NAMES YEAR IN SERVICE

Teofilo Salcedo 1948-1951 Fortunato Carbajal, Sr. 1951-1954

Lorenzo S. Dinlayan 1955-1971

Timoteo C. Ocaya 1972-1979 Edi lberto B. Mamawag (Appointed) 1979-1980

Reginaldo N. Tilanduca 1980-1986 Violeta T. Labaria (Appointed) 1986

Almaco A. Villanueva (Appointed) 1987 Rogelio M. Bides (Appointed) 1988

Reginaldo N. Tilanduca 1988 – Ma rch 1992

Bob Roberto T. Casanova (By Succession) April 1992 – June 1992 Nicolas C. Jurolan July 1992 to June 2001

Florencio T. Flores, Jr. July 2001 June 2010 Ignacio W. Zubiri July 2010 - present

The idea of converting Malaybalay from the Municipality to City had begun in the early pa rt

of 1994 when it acquired two requisites for cityhood -- income and land area -- a s certi fied by the Department of Finance and the Na tiona l Sta tistics Office . It wa s publ icly a nnounced by the Congressman of the Second District of Bukidnon, Hon. Regina ldo N. Ti la nduca who signi fied to sponsor a bill in the Lower House. Senator Gloria Macapagal Arroyo who was also present during Ma la yba la y’s 117th Founda tion Da y decla red to sponsor the bi l l in the Sena te.

On Ma rch 26, 1996, the Sangguniang Bayan of Malaybalay passed Resolution No. 3599-96

petitioning Congress for the creation of Malaybalay into a city. On the First Regular Session of the Tenth Congress, Congressman Tilanduca introduced House Bill No. 6275, entitled an Act Converting the Municipality of Malaybalay into an Independent Component Ci ty to be known a s the Ci ty o f Ma laybalay. In his explanatory note, the congressma n stressed out tha t the conversion wa s imperative for the effective del ivery of ba sic regula r a nd direct services to i ts consti tuency.

1 – Firs t elected mayor 2 – Served as mayor during the J apanese period 3 – Appointed mayor by Philippines Civil Affairs Unit, U.S. Army

115



Furthermore, its conversion would enhance the development of Malaybalay, which is presently the seat of government and center for education, commerce, trade and industry in Centra l Bukidnon.

After complying with the requirements set by the Commission on Election pa rticula rly the

budget for the conduct of a Plebiscite and the publication of the Republic Act 8490 which was signed into law by President Fidel V. Ramos on February 11, 1998, the referendum was conducted on March 22, 1998. About 95% of the 24,621 registered voters approved the cityhood of Malaybalay, making it the fi rst component ci ty of Bukidnon.

Vision

We aspire and see Malaybalay City as a prime agri -industrial center in Northern

Mindanao with vibrant economy where people are God-centered, productive, contented

and self-reliant, l iving in an ecologically balanced environment managed by dynamic,

transparent and accountable leaders.

Mission

To materialize these aspirations, the city government shall provide basic services,

encourage business enterprises, promote social justice and ensure effective management

and uti l ization of its natural resources.

116



Budget Performance and Financial Statements

GENDER AND DEVELOPMENT FUND

ANNUAL BUDGET, 2011

A. GENDER MAINSTREAMING 1. Advoca cy on RA 9262 (VAWC) 100,000.00 2. Women Reproductive Hea lth a nd

Motherhood Sa fety 100,000.00 3. Tra inings and Semina rs 100,000.00

B. SKILLS TRAINING AND DEV’T. PROGRAM

1. RIC Ski l l s Tra ining Semina r 200,000.00 2. 4-H Club Ca pa bi l i ty Dev’t. Progra ms 100,000.00

C. EMERGENCY FUNDS FOR MEDICINE,

HOSPITALIZATION, HOSPITAL AND LABORATORY FEES FOR INDIGENTS 6,000,000.00

D. COMPREHENSIVE NUTRITION PROGRAM 1. Micro-Nutrient Supplementa tion 200,000.00 2. Deworming Progra m 100,000.00 3. Supplemental Feeding Program 400,000.00

E. COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH PROGRAM

1. Medica l -Denta l Outrea ch 100,000.00 2. Reproductive Hea lth 150,000.00 3. BHW/BNS/Hi lots Da y 200,000.00 4. CBMIS 800,000.00

F. COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PROGRAM

1. City Schola rship Progra m 5,000,000.00 2. Vocational/Technica l Ski l l s Tra ining 300,000.00 3. Alterna tive Educa tion a nd Functiona l

Li teracy Cum Live l ihood/SPED 1,500,000.00 4. Financial Assista nce/Educa tiona l Fund (SP) 1,835,000.00 5. Support to Educa tion 3,000,000.00

117



20% City Development Fund Annua l Budget, 2011

A: ENVIRONMENT SECTOR 1. Support to PAMB Activities 1,500,000.00 2. Clean and Green Programs 1,000,000.00 3. Sol id Waste Management Programs 2,000,000.00 4. Pol lution and Flood Control 500,000.00 Sub-total 5,000,000.00 B: ECONOMIC SECTOR

1. Support to Agriculture Infrastructure Development a . Post Harvest Facilities 2,500,000.00 b. Irrigation PPA’s 5,000,000.00 2. Cooperative Development Programs a . Trainings and Seminars 500,000.00 b. Support to Cooperative Programs 500,000.00 3. Tourism Development Programs 3,000,000.00 4. Business and Industry Enhancement 1,000,000.00 5. Employment Facilitation Program a . SPES/WAP 1,000,000.00 b. Employment Promotion 500,000.00 Sub-total 14,000,000.00 C: INFRASTRUCTURE SECTOR

1. Public Works and Infrastructure 20,000,000.00 2. Support to Development Projects

a . Barangay Assistance Fund 3,500,000.00 b. Barangay Development Programs 23,000,000.00 Sub-total 46,500,000.00

D: SOCIAL SECTOR 1. Housing and Resettlement 2,000,000.00 2. Health Services PPA’s 3,000,000.00 Sub-total 5,000,000.00 E: LOCAL ADMINISTRATION SECTOR

1. Human Resource Development 5,000,000.00 2. Support to Lupon Tagapamayapa and

Chi ld-friendly Program 500,000.00 3. Special Celebration/ Cultural Enhancement Programs 3,500,000.00 4. Strengthening of PO’s/ NGO’s and Special Bodies 1,000,000.00 5. Ca pability Building 1,000,000.00 6. GIS / MISS 2,000,000.00 7. Support to ACC / MERU / 117 1,500,000.00 8. Pea ce and Order PPA’s 10,000,000.00 9. Loa n Equity Amortization 15,000,000.00 Sub-total 39,500,000.00

T O T A L P 110,000,000,00

118



ANNUAL INVESTMENT PLAN ANNUAL BUDGET 2011

GENERAL SERVICES

P/S 122,521,132.00 MOOE5 3,125,218.00 Ca pital Outlay 160,000.00

TOTAL 175,806,350.00

SOCIAL SERVICES P/S 36,421,569.00 MOOE 16,026,000.00

TOTAL 52,447,569.00 ECONOMIC SERVICES

P/S 62,527,088.00 MOOE 33,748,000.00

TOTAL 96,275,088.00

SPECIAL PROVISION ALLOCATION Legislative Services 8,894,957.72 Support to Administrative Services 59,414,823.00 Support to Special Bodies PPA’s 2,200,000.00 Support to Communication Services 250,000.00 Support to Protective Services PPA’s 2,000,000.00 Support to Human Resource Development Program 2,050,000.00 Support Special Celebrations PPA's 7,750,000.00 Support to Development Projects 5,840,042.28 Support to Health Services PPA's 5,500,000.00 Support to Sports Development Program 1,000,000.00 Support to Malaybalay Ci ty Amateur Boxing Association 100,000.00 Support to Teaching Services 2,300,000.00 Subsidy to Public Utilities and Economic Enterprises 3,041,170.00

TOTAL 100,340,993.00

STATUTORY AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS 20% Development Fund 110,000,000.00 Aid to Barangay Development Fund 46,000.00

TOTAL 110,046,000.00

BUDGETARY REQUIREMENTS 5% Budgetary Reserve for Calamities 29,819,500.00 5% Reserve for Gender Issues per RA 7192 31,654,500.00

TOTAL 61,474,000.00

GRAND TOTAL 596,390,000.00

119



List of Programs

1. Ca pability building 2. Hiring of additional personnel 3. Provision of social services infrastructure and Facilities 4. Provision of livelihood projects to qualified organizations/individuals 5. Identify and protect areas for food production 6. Provision of incentives to farmers 7. Esta blished market linkage for processors, integrators and producers 8. Support to identified potential tourist spots/destinations. 9. Formulate tourism master plan 10. Strengthen employment services 11. Promote sustainable resource use. 12. Promote agri-forestry technology. 13. Strengthen investment promotion committee 14. Promote diversified farming practices 15. Identify and develop commercial zones 16. Enforce riverbank easements in protection and production forests. 17. Promote soil/water conservation practices 18. Provide incentives for exemplary environmental practices and services. 19. Provide infrastructure and facilities in support to agriculture 20. Enforce forest products wildlife and resources, extraction and use policies. 21. Sustain support to forest protectors/enforcers. 22. IEC on importance of prime land preservation 23. Enhance skills and capabilities of farmers 24. Build capabilities and develop occupational skills of labor force 25. Additional equipment for infrastructure 26. Identify resettlement sites 27. Construction of new city hall 28. Updating of local revenue code and revision of market value of real properties

a .1 Strongly lobby for the passage of an ordinance/ code a .2 Conduct of public hearing a .3 Implementation of the code 29. Da ta management 30. Imposition of legal remedies on collection of delinquent real properties 31. Institutionalization of the city’s Human Resource Management and Development Plan 32. Monitoring & evaluation 33. Information and education campaign 34. Finalization of IRGS 35. Work and financial planning 36. La nd banking 37. Institutionalization of ELA 38. Assistance to social services 39. Conduct of Tax Mapping 40. Conduct of Business Tax Mapping 41. Legitimization of the documents (HRMDP)

a . Creation of committee composed of competent members from the SP and concern offices b. Creation of steering committee

42. Nurseries Development 43. Ma intenance of communal forest 44. Wa tershed Development

120



45. Riverbank and easement protection 46. Irrigation canal development and rehabilitation 47. Na tural Resource Basic Inventory, identification and declaration of protected areas 48. Expa nsion of educational facilities in the rural areas 49. Expa nsion of commercial areas 50. Urban Greening

List of Projects

1. Updating of local revenue code and revision of market value of real properties

a .1 Strongly lobby for the passage of an ordinance/ code a .2 Conduct of public hearing a .3 Implementation of the code 2. Da ta management 3. Imposition of legal remedies on collection of delinquent real properties 4. Institutionalization of city’s HRMDP 5. Monitoring & evaluation of all development projects 6. Information and educational campaign for all plans, programs and projects 7. Construction of social services facilities 8. Finalization of IRGS 9. Additional equipment 10. Work and financial planning 11. La nd banking 12. Institutionalization of ELA 13. Assistance to social services 14. Conduct of Tax Mapping 15. Identify resettlement sites 16.Conduct of Business Tax Mapping 17. Legitimization of the documents (HRMDP)

18. Crea tion of committee composed of competent members from the SP and concern offices

19. Crea tion of steering committee 20. Construction of new City Hall 21. Improvement of power facilities 22. Decongest traffic flows in urban and urbanizing barangays 23. Expa nsion of water, transmission and distribution lines and other facilities

24. Construction of collection point in all purok at highway and upper pulangi ba rangays and Basakan areas and Ci ty Final Disposal Facility/Sanitary Landfill

25. Formulate and implement the city wastewater management program 26. Support to community-based water distribution system 27. Set-up water quality monitoring system 28. Develop and implement connection, disconnection and collection policies 29. Coordinate with the LGU in imposition of water tarrif. 30. Identify or establish three areas to house the three-equipment set (1 grader, 1, loa der, 3

Dumptruck a nd 1 roa d rol ler). The proposed a rea s a re Upper Pula ngui (Brgy. Za mboanguita ); Ba sa ka n Area s (Brgy Lina bo); Pobla cion Area s (CEO compound)

31. Identify and establish alternate waterways for run-off water. 32. Provide tax holidays for communication utilities and public transportation. 33. Section of barangay office as post office. 34. Enforcement of anti-jaywalking ordinance

121



35. Construction of a state of the art training center 36. Construction of new city hall 37. Construction/renovation of the city health office with all the health services 38. Construction of Youth Home 39. Construction of a Sports Complex 40. Construction of a Detention Center for Women 41. Construction of Motorpool 42. Construction of Low Cost Houses 43. Si te Development of proposed City employees Housing 44. Nurseries development 45. Ma intenance of communal forest

List of Best Practices/Innovations

1. Newborn Screening program 2. Sa ndugo program 3. BOSS (Business One Stop Shop) 4. MISS (Malaybalay Integrated Survey System) 5. Chi ld Friendly 6. Supervised Neighborhood Play 7. Abot Kamay ang Pag-asa 8. Ci ty Linis Project 9. Da kip Aso 10. Solid Waste Management 11. Nutri tion Program 12. Internal Revenue Generation System 13. Tra nsaction Protocol Manual (TPM) 14. Sentrong Sigla 15. Nutri tion Program 16. Scholarship Program

List of Ordinances Approved, CY 2011

1. An Addendum Ordinance to appropriation ordina nce no. 708 S. 2010 processing the

va rious amounts of the Performance Enhancements Incentives of the new listed officials, employees, barangay functionaries, teachers and officials of various select organiza tion

2. An ordinance amending Sec. 6.e of Ordinance No. 627 series of 2008 by cha nging the

term reti rement benefi ts to incentives

3. An Ordinance approving the CY 2011 20% Loca l Development Fund Annua l Budget for va rious projects of the Ci ty Government of Ma la yba la y in the a mount of Php 110,000,000.00

4. An ordina nce a pproving the GAD Fund Annua l Budget for CY 2011 of the Ci ty of

Ma la yba la y in the a mount of Php 31,654,500.00

122



5. An ordinance to strengthen enforcement of la ws prohibi ting tra fficking in persons including the tra fficking of chi ldren in Ma la yba la y Ci ty.

6. An ordinance appropriating the amount of Php 152,475,675.00 a s supplemental budget

no. 1 for CY 2011 of the City Government of Malaybalay with funding sources of savings from Retained Earnings/Surplus at the end of the year; 20% Development Fund (MOOE) a nd the ca la mity fund.

7. An ordinance appropriating the amount of Php 24,000.00 a s subsidy from the Genera l

Fund for the Supl lementa l Budget No. 1 CY 2011 of the CEEDMO.

8. An ordinance approving the Gender and Development Fund of the Supplemental Budget No. 1 for CY 2011 in the a mount of Php 8,098,784.00.

9. An ordinance approving the 20% Development Fund of the Supplemental Budget No. 1

for CY 2011 in the a mount of Php 43,512,361.90

10. An ordinance approving the breakdown of budget of the Mindanao Rural Development Progra m (MRDP). Community Fund for Agricultural Development (CFAD), component projects of the different barangays within the Ci ty of Malaybalay, duly identified by the City Agriculture’s Office in the amount of Php 2,500,000.00 a nd granting authority to the Hon. Ci ty Mayor Ignacio W. Zubiri and the Hon. Ci ty Vice Ma yor Victor P. Aldeguer to sign the said Implementing Management Agreement in behalf of the City of Malaybala y.

11. An ordina nce strictly requiring ti tle presenta tion of a n Upda ted Professiona l

Identification Card as pre-requisite to the issuance of Professional Tax Registration of the Ci ty to Pra cticing Professiona ls.

12. An ordinance appropriating the amount of Php 253,823,354.46 a s Supplemental Budget

No. 2 for CY 2011 of the Ci ty Government of Ma la yba la y with funding sources from underestimated IRA (Jan. to Dec. 2011), Reversion of Appropria tion (Ci ty Tria l Court), Accounts Payable Gen. Fund reverted to surplus and accounts payables Genera l Fund 20% Development Fund reverted to surplus.

13. An ordinance approving the 20% Development Fund of Supplemental Budget No. 2 for

CY 2011 in the a mount of Php 68,977,108.29

14. An ordinance appropriating the amount of Php 200,000.00 a s subsidy from the Genera l for the Supplementa l Budget No. 2 CY 2011 of the CEEDMO.

15. An ordinance approving the Gender and Development Fund of the Supplemental Budget

No. 2 for CY 2011 in the a mount of Php 11,190,580.00

16. An ordinance creating the City Dengue Task Force, providing for their functions a nd responsibilities for the Dengue Prevention a nd Control a nd enjoining the Loca l Government Unit in this ci ty to crea te their Ba ra nga y Dengue Ta sk Force for this purpose.

17. An ordinance that prohibits all Sanitary Engineers, Master Plumbers, Water Uti l i ties to

install water system to any building whether residential and others without plumbing permit a nd providing pena lties in viola tion thereof.

123



18. An ordinance that prohibits all electricians’, e lectric uti l i ty to insta l l wirings to a ny

building whether residential, commercial, institutional, industria l a nd others without e lectrica l permit a nd providing pena lties in viola tion thereof.

19. An ordina nce to a ugment the a mount of Php 150,000.00 from the tra inings a nd

seminars fund a l loca ted in the Supplementa l Budget No. 2 CY 2011 to tra vel l ing expenses both under the maintenance and other operating expenses (MOOE) if the Ci ty Engineer’s Office of Ma la yba la y.

20. An ordinance to augment the a mount of Php 100,000.00 from the Comprehensive

Nutri tion Program – Deworming of the Gender and Development Fund, Annua l Budget CY 2011 to the Comprehensive Nutrition Progra m. Micronutrient Supplementa l of Gender a nd Development Fund of the Ci ty of Ma la yba la y.

21. An ordinance to augment the a mount of Php 298,800.00 from the Communica tion

services/expenses, newspaper and magazine subscriptions, repair and maintena nce of Government vehicles to the travelling expenses, Vice Mayor’s Office. Other series of the MOOE of the office of the Ci ty Vice Ma yor of Ma la yba la y.

22. An ordina nce to a ugment the a mount of 314,000.00 from the Communica tion

Services/expenses, newspapers and magazine subscriptions, repair and maintenance of Government vehicles, trainings and seminars, legisla tive resea rch to the repa ir a nd ma intenance of Government vehicles, gasoline, oil and lubricants, SP-other services of the Sa nggunia ng Pa nlungsod of Ma la yba la y.

23. An ordinance to augment the various amounts to the MOOE of the Ci ty Ma yo r’s office ,

Ci ty Ma yor’s Office – Business Permits and Licensing Division, CSWDO a nd CEEDMO of the Ci ty of Ma la yba la y.

24. An ordina nce to a ugment the va rious a mounts to the MOOE of the SP Office of

Ma laybalay with sources from the MOOE of the SP Office , Ci ty Hea lth Office a nd the CGSO.

25. An ordinance approving the breakdown of budget of the Mindanao Rural Development

Progra m-Community Fund for the Agricultural Development (MRDP-CFAD) Component projects of the different barangays within the Ci ty of Malaybalay duly identi fied by the City Agriculture’s Office in the total amount of Php 2,500,000.00, a nd granting authori ty to the Hon. City Mayor Ignacio W. Zubiri and Hon. City Vice Mayor Victor P. Aldeguer to sign the said Addendum to the Implementation Ma na gement Agreement for a nd in beha l f of the Ci ty Government of Ma la yba la y.

26. An ordinance appropria ting the a mount of Php 56,075,000.00 cha rgea ble a ga inst

a ppropriate savings CY 2011 a s Productivity Enhancement Incentives (PEI) for CY 2011 for all elected officials, regula r, ca sua l , a ppointed a nd job order employees a nd members of the Special Bodies of the Ci ty Government of Mala yba la y, a s wel l a s the DepEd Schools Division Superintendent, District Supervisors and select tea chers, other select government agencies and organizations but subject to special bodies conditions, pursuant to Administrative Order No. 24 dated December 1, 2011, DBM Loca l Budget Circular No. 2011-4 dated December 5, 2011 a nd the “De Minimis Benefits” Pre-Revenue Regula tion No. 10-2008 of RA 9004.

124



27. An ordinance augmenting grants, aids and subsidies for 46 barnagays the a mount of P

12, 132,500.00 from sa vings CY 2011.

List of Executive Orders Issued, CY 2011

1. Executive Order No. 01-S. 2011, Re-organizing the Ci ty Development Council (CDF) of the

Ci ty of Ma la yba la y

2. Executive Order No. 02, S. 2011, An Executive Order Appointing Hon. Alexander Maputi , Sr. As Liga Ng Mga Barangay Representative in the People’s La w Enforcement Boa rd (PLEB)

3. Executive Order No. 03, S. 2011, Executive Order Reconstituting the Ci ty Development Counci l , Non-Government Orga niza tions/Civi l Society Orga niza tions, People’s Orga niza tions (NGOs/CSOs/Pos) representa tive who a re duly a ccredited by the Sa nggunia ng Pa nlungsod unti l otherwise revoked.

4. Executive Order No. 4, S. 2011, Reconsti tuting the Executive Committee of the Ci ty

Development Counci l of Ma la yba la y

5. Executive Order No. 5, S. of 2011, An Executive Order crea ting the Ci ty Project Monitoring Committee

6. Executive Order No. 6, S. of 2011, An Executive Order creating the Local Zoning Board of

Adjustments and Appeals (LZBAA) a nd the Loca l Zoning Review Committee (LZRC).

7. Executive Order No. 7, S. of 2011, An Executive Order designa ting a Zoning Administrator/Zoning Officer in compliance to the joint Memorandum Circular No. 01 S. 2005 between the HLURB a nd City of Ma la yba la y.

8. Executive Order No. 08, S. of 2011, An Executive Order creating the Malayba la y Senior

Ci tizen Coordina ting a nd Monitoring Boa rd (MCSCCMB)

9. Executive Order No. 09, S. of 2011, An Executive Order designa ting/a ppointing a uthorized Sol id Wa ste Ma na gement a pprehending officers/enforcers.

10. Executive Order No.10, S. of 2011, An Executive Order decla ring Ma rch 22, 2011, A

Specia l Non-Working Hol ida y

11. Executive Order No. 11, S. of 2011, An Executive Order Reorganizing and Reconsti tuting the Personnel Se lection Boa rd (PSB) for the Ci ty Government of Ma la yba la y

12. Executive Order No. 12, S. of 2011, An Order mandating that all perishable goods fi t for

Human Consumption confiscated by the Ci ty Anti-Illegal Vending Ta sk Force sha l l be properly inventories and shall be dona ted to the inma tes of the Ma la yba la y Ci ty.

13. Executive Order No. 13, S. of 2011, Re-organizing the Malaybalay Ci ty Price Coordinating

Counci l

125



14. Executive Order No. 14, S. of 2011, An Executive Ord er crea ting the Ci ty Ra bies

Prevention and control Committee, defining i ts role a nd ra tiona l izing the control mea sures for the prevention a nd era dica tion of ra bies

15. Executive Order No. 15, S. of 2011, An Executive Order re -orga nizing the Ci ty STI HIV

Counci l

16. Executive Order No. 16, S. of 2011, An Order implementing Ca rgo Truck Ba n a long Poblacion Fortich Street from junction Sayre Highway and Diversion Roa d Sumpong to Junction Sa yre Highwa y a nd Na tiona l Roa d Ca sisa ng

17. Executive Order No. 17, S. of 2011, An Executive Order declaring the afternoon of Apri l

20, 2011, A Non-Working Holiday in the Ci ty Government of Malaybalay and establishing rules a nd regula tion to implement in observa nce of the Holy Week

18. Executive Order No. 18, S. of 2011, An Executive Order Reorga nizing a n Inspectora te

Tean for Construction Materials, Computers a nd Informa tion Technology-Rela ted Procurement, office suppl ies vehicle spa re pa rts, medicines/medica l suppl ies, a gricul tura l a nd veterina ry suppl ies.

19. Executive Order No. 19, S. of 2011, An Order creating the Ci ty Unserviceable Equipments

a nd Property Disposa l Committee a nd Appra isa l Committee

20. Executive Order No. 20, S. of 2011, An Executive Order Organizing and reconstituting the members of the Disposal and Appraisal Committee of the City Government of Malabalay pursua nt to Section 79 of PD 1445

21. Executive Order No. 21, S. of 2011, An Executive order declaring June 15, 2011, A special

Non-Working Hol ida y

22. Executive Order No. 21, S. of 2011, An Executive Order declaring June 15, 2011, A special Non-Working Hol ida y

23. Executive Order No. 22, S. of 2011, An Executive Order granting Economic and Incentives Awa rds for Outsta nding Lupon 2010

24. Executive Order No. 23, S. of 2011, An Executive Order Adopting the “Grea t Fi l ipino Workout” as an Integral Part of the Physical Fitness and Sports Development Program of the Ci ty Government of Ma la yba la y

25. Executive Order No. 24, S. of 2011, An Executive Order creating an Executive Committee

to plan for the activities of the Philippine Civil Service Anniversary on September 2011.

26. Executive Order No. 25, S. of 2011, An Executive Order crea ting a Technica l Working Committee to plan for the activities of the forthcoming children’s month celebration this October 2011

27. Executive Order No. 26, S. of 2011, Creation of Irrigation Construction Supervision Tea m

(ICST) to conduct monitoring a nd supervision of the construction of Ma na gok Communal Irrigation Project (CIP) under the Mindanao Rura l Development Progra m-Ada pta ble Progra m Loa n (MRDP-APL)

126



28. Executive Order No. 27, S. of 2011, Establishing the Agro-Forestry system a t Kiba la ba g

Wa tershed Areas and selected Ancestral Domains at Baranga y Busdi a nd crea ting i ts council and Technical Working Group (TWG)/project implementa tion tea m (PIT) a nd defining i ts functions a nd responsibi l i ties.

29. Executive Order No. 28, S. of 2011, Regulating the holding of fun runs, tra i l a nd other

similar activities in the Ci ty of Malaybalay and prescribing the guidelines for the Issuance of the Ci ty Ma yors’ Permit for the conduct thereof.

30. Executive Order No. 29, S. of 2011, Prescribing guidel ines in the prepa ra tion of the

Approved Budget for the Contracts (ABCs) for Infrastructure and implemented by the Ci ty Government of Ma la yba la y

31. Executive Order No. 30, S. of 2011, Amending and Expanding the Inspectorate Tea m for

Construction Materia ls to include Infra structure Projects of the Ci ty Government

32. Executive Order No. 31, S. of 2011, An Executive Order Re -orga nizing the Ci ty Project Monitoring Committee a nd Crea ting i ts Technica l Working Grou p

33. Executive Order No. 32, S. of 2011, An Executive Order granting Economic and Incentive

Awa rds for Outsta nding Lupon CY 2011

127



MESSAGE ...................................................................................................................................... 1

PART 1: STATE OF PERFORMANCE ..................................................................................................... 8

PERFORMANCE AREA: ADMINISTRATIVE GOVERNANCE....................................................................... 8

LOCAL LEGISLATION................................ ................................ ................................ .......................... 8

DEVELOPMENT PLANNING ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 8

REVENUE GENERATION................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... 9 RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND UTILIZATION................................ ................................ ................................ 11

CUSTOMER SERVICE ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................ 12

PERFORMANCE AREA: SOCI AL SERVICES ........................................................................................... 15

HEALTH SERVICES ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................... 15

HOUSING AND BASIC UTIL ITIES ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 16

PEACE, SECURITY AND DISASTER ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 17

PERFORMANCE AREA: ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE .............................................................................. 21

SUPPORT TO AGRICULTURE ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 21

ENTREPRENEUR & BUSINESS INDUSTRY PROMOTION ................................ ................................ .................... 22

PERFORMANCE AREA: ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE ..................................................................... 25

PERFORMANCE AREA: VALUING GOVERNANCE ................................................................................. 29

PARTICIPATION................................ ................................ ................................ .............................. 29

TRANSPARENCY ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................. 29

Cost to collect revenues................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 32 Locally-sourced Revenues to total income................................ ................................ .................... 33

Regular Revenue to total income ................................ ................................ ............................... 34

Locally source revenue level ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 35 Locally source revenue per capita................................ ................................ ............................... 35

Real Property Tax Accomplishment Rate ................................ ................................ ..................... 36

RESOU RCED ALLOCATION AND U TILIZATION ...................................................................................... 37

Personal Services Expenditure Ratio ................................ ................................ ........................... 37 Total Expenditure Per Capita ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 38

Debt Service Ratio ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 39

PROVINCI AL SUMMARY REPORT ...................................................................................................... 40

MINUTES ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 46

LGU BASIC FACTS AND FIGURES................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 49

LGU SCORECARD ON HEALTH - DCF FOR COMPONENT CITIES AND MUNICI PALITIES ............................... 101

BRIEF HISTORY ............................................................................................................................ 113

VISION ....................................................................................................................................... 115

MISSION .................................................................................................................................... 115

BU DGET PERFORMANCE AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ..................................................................... 116

LIST OF PROGRAMS ..................................................................................................................... 119

TABLE OF CONTENTS

128



LIST OF PROJECTS ................................ ........................................................................................ 120

LIST OF BEST PRACTICES/INNOVATIONS .......................................................................................... 121

LIST OF ORDINANCES APPROVED, CY 2011....................................................................................... 121

LIST OF EXECUTIVE ORDERS ISSU ED, CY 2011 ................................ ................................................... 124