2011-2012 bill 73: constitutional amendment proposed ...  · web view“(c)the general assembly...

4
South Carolina General Assembly 119th Session, 2011-2012 S. 73 STATUS INFORMATION Joint Resolution Sponsors: Senators Thomas, Rose and Peeler Document Path: l:\council\bills\bbm\9822htc11.docx Companion/Similar bill(s): 3 Introduced in the Senate on January 11, 2011 Currently residing in the Senate Committee on Judiciary Summary: Constitutional amendment proposed HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS Date Body Action Description with journal page number 12/1/2010 Senate Prefiled 12/1/2010 Senate Referred to Committee on Judiciary 1/11/2011 Senate Introduced and read first time (Senate Journal - page 37 ) 1/11/2011 Senate Referred to Committee on Judiciary (Senate Journal - page 37 ) 1/21/2011 Senate Referred to Subcommittee: L.Martin (ch), Rankin, Hutto, Bright, Davis VERSIONS OF THIS BILL 12/1/2010 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

Upload: others

Post on 08-Jul-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2011-2012 Bill 73: Constitutional amendment proposed ...  · Web view“(c)The General Assembly shall prescribe by law a spending limitation on appropriations for the operation of

South Carolina General Assembly119th Session, 2011-2012

S. 73

STATUS INFORMATION

Joint ResolutionSponsors: Senators Thomas, Rose and PeelerDocument Path: l:\council\bills\bbm\9822htc11.docxCompanion/Similar bill(s): 3

Introduced in the Senate on January 11, 2011Currently residing in the Senate Committee on Judiciary

Summary: Constitutional amendment proposed

HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS

Date Body Action Description with journal page number 12/1/2010 Senate Prefiled12/1/2010 Senate Referred to Committee on Judiciary1/11/2011 Senate Introduced and read first time (Senate Journal - page 37 )1/11/2011 Senate Referred to Committee on Judiciary (Senate Journal - page 37 )1/21/2011 Senate Referred to Subcommittee: L.Martin (ch), Rankin, Hutto, Bright, Davis

VERSIONS OF THIS BILL

12/1/2010

123456789

1011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132

Page 2: 2011-2012 Bill 73: Constitutional amendment proposed ...  · Web view“(c)The General Assembly shall prescribe by law a spending limitation on appropriations for the operation of

A JOINT RESOLUTION

PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 7, ARTICLE X OF THE CONSTITUTION OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1895, RELATING TO THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE STATE AND ITS POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS TO HAVE BUDGET PROCESSES DESIGNED TO KEEP REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES IN BALANCE, THE LIMITATION ON STATE APPROPRIATIONS, AND THE LIMITATIONS ON STATE EMPLOYEES, SO AS TO DELETE THE EXISTING STATE SPENDING LIMITATION AND REQUIRE THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO REPLACE IT BY A LAW PROVIDING A LIMIT ON STATE SPENDING FOR A FISCAL YEAR THAT EQUALS THE TOTAL OF STATE APPROPRIATIONS IN THE PRIOR YEAR INCREASED BY THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF INCREASES IN STATE PERSONAL INCOME AND STATE POPULATION IN THE MOST RECENT YEAR FOR WHICH THIS INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AND PROVIDE THAT THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY IN ENACTING THIS LIMIT SHALL DEFINE THE APPROPRIATIONS TO WHICH THE LIMIT APPLIES, AND THE METHOD OF AND SOURCES FOR CALCULATING THE LIMIT AND TO MAKE CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:

SECTION 1. It is proposed that the first two paragraphs of Section 7(c), Article X of the Constitution of this State be amended to read:

“(c) The General Assembly shall prescribe by law a spending limitation on appropriations for the operation of state government which shall provide that annual increases in such appropriations

[73] 1

123456789

101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142

Page 3: 2011-2012 Bill 73: Constitutional amendment proposed ...  · Web view“(c)The General Assembly shall prescribe by law a spending limitation on appropriations for the operation of

may not exceed the average growth rate of the economy of the State as measured by a process provided for by the law which prescribes the limitations on appropriations; provided, however provides that the state appropriations for a fiscal year must not exceed the total of the prior year’s state appropriations increased by the total of percentage increases in state personal income and state population in the most recent year for which this information is available. However, the limitation may be suspended for any one fiscal year by a special vote as provided in this subsection. The law implementing the limit must specify the appropriations to which this limit applies, the method of calculating the limit, and the sources which must be used in obtaining the information required for the calculation.

During the regular session of the General Assembly in 1990 2015 and during every fifth annual regular session thereafter, the General Assembly shall conduct and complete a review of the law implementing this subsection. During such session, only a vote of two-thirds of the members of each branch present and voting shall be is required to change the existing limitation on appropriation. Unless that is done, the existing limitations shall remain unchanged.”

SECTION 2. The proposed amendment must be submitted to the qualified electors at the next general election for representatives. Ballots must be provided at the various voting precincts with the following words printed or written on the ballot:

“Must Section 7, Article X of the Constitution of this State be amended relating to the requirement for the State and its political subdivisions to have budget processes designed to keep revenues and expenditures in balance and the limitation on state appropriations, so as to delete the existing state spending limitation and require the General Assembly to replace it by a law providing a limit on state spending for a fiscal year that is the total of state appropriations in the prior year increased by the total percentage increases in state personal income and state population growth in the most recent year for which this information is available, to provide that this implementing law must specify the appropriations to which this limit applies, the method of calculating this limit, and the sources which must be used in obtaining the information required for the calculation and to make conforming amendments?

Yes

[73] 2

123456789

10111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243

Page 4: 2011-2012 Bill 73: Constitutional amendment proposed ...  · Web view“(c)The General Assembly shall prescribe by law a spending limitation on appropriations for the operation of

No

Those voting in favor of the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after the word ‘Yes’, and those voting against the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after the word ‘No’.”

----XX----

[73] 3

123456789