2010 epa letters regarding remediation metrics …...additionally, epa believes that there are i6...

JUl 1 2 2010

Mr. W. Russ Ashworth Director, Office of Management Services U.S. Department of Agriculture South Agriculture Building 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Rm 1456 Washington, D.C. 20250-9338

Dear Mr. Ashworth:

The purpose of this annual letter is to ensure close coordination between the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in meeting key Government Perfonnance and Results Act (OPRA) measures. As you know, EPA annually tracks accomplishments at Superfund NPL sites, of which USDA NPL sites are a part. These measures include: Human Exposure Environmental Indicator (EI); Migration of Contaminated Groundwater (EI); Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use (SWRAU); Construction Completions (CC); and Five~Year Reviews (5YR). Although 5YRs are not GPRA measures, they are a very important activity and EPA reports annually to Congress our progress towards meeting these targets.

We appreciate USDA's continued efforts to work with EPA to ensure that we are accurately capturing our progress toward protection of human health and the environment. Below is a status update of the aforementioned measures:

• Environmental Indicators By fhe end of FY2010, EPA has a nafionally esfablished overall goal of 148 Federal NPL

sites (out of 173) achieving the Human Exposure Under Control EI slalus and 109 federal NPL sites achieving the Groundwater Migration Under Control EJ status. Using our FY201 0 mid~ year data, EPA believes that Human Exposure is Under Control at BELTSVILLE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER and af FREMONT NATIONAL FOREST/ WHITE KING AND LUCKY LASS URANIUM MINES

Additionally, EPA believes that Groundwater Migration is Under Control at FREMONT NATIONAL FOREST/WHITE KING AND LUCKY LASS URANIUM MINES; hOlVever, fhere is Insufficient Data to make a Groundwater Migration determination at BELTSVILLE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER Please provide us with your estimate of when USDA expecfs BELTSVILLE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER to achieve a status of Groundwater Migration Under Control.

• Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use EPA's Superfund program has its own acreage measure independent of any state or

agency. EPA measures acres with two distinci indicators: i) Acres Protectedfor People (PFP) and 2) Acres Ready for Anlicipaled Use (RA U). Additionally, the Superfund program measures the number oj sites which are Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use (SWRA U). Ailiand-based Superfund acres are designated by Operable Unit (aU) or parcel.

The PFP designation is usedfor acres which are currently protective for human health (i.e. Human Exposure is Under Control). The RAU designation is usedfor acres which are protective for human health, all cleanup goals in Ihe Decision Documenl(s) have been achieved, and all institutional controls (if necessary) have been put in place. Once all OU's or parcels have been designated as RA U, and the facility is already Construction Complete, the installation meets the criteria for becoming SWRAU (for NPL sites only).

BELTSVILLE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER and FREMONT NATIONAL FORESTIWHITE KiNG AND LUCKY LASS URANIUM MiNES are currently not planned to accomplish this measure within the next several years.

• Construction Completion As YOIl are aware, EPA's CC measure is one of the primary tools used by EPA to report

the progress of cleanup activities. We are very interested in accurately and realistically projecting the achievement ofCCs at all Federal sites in the context of ensuring the protection oj human health and the environment. FREMONT NA TIONAL FORESTIWHITE KiNG AND LUCKY LASS URANIUM MINES achieved this measure in FY2006, and BELTSVILLE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER is currently not planned to accomplish this measure within the next several years.

• Five-Year Reviews Five-Year Reviews are conducted to evaluate the implementation and performance of a

remedy in order to determine i/the remedy is, or will be, protective of human health and the environment. BELTSVILLE AGRICULTURA L RESEARCH CENTER is currently not scheduled for a 5YR, and FREMONT NATIONAL FOREST/ WHITE KiNG AND LUCKY LASS URANIUM MINES completed its latest 5YR in FY2010.

in FY20iO, EPA 's Inspector General (IG) performed an audit on Federal Facility FiveYear Review reports, their associated data, their Issues and Recommendations, timeliness of the reports, etc. The IG recommends that EPA improve irs role in, and management of, Federal facility 5YRs. We have transmitted this report to you under separate cover.

The agency considers all of these measures of critical importance because they enable us to report to the public and Congress where actions have been taken to protect human health and the environment at Superfund NPL sites. Achjevement of these measures is based on a continually successful partnership between EPA and USDA. Many communities have expressed an interest in more transparency. and involvement in the cleanup of contaminated sites. EPA is committed to implementing a management strategy to identify opportunities for more community involvement.

In addition, EPA is initiating an aggressive multi-year effort, called the Integrated Cleanup Initiative (lCI), to integrate and leverage its land cleanup authorities (i.e., Superfund Remedial, Removal, Federal Sites, and Brownfields) to address a greater number of contaminated sites, accelerate cleanups, and put sites back into productive use while protecting human health and the envirorunent. As a first step, EPA has committed to a new publicly reported performance measure in FY2011 - an increase in completion of Superfund remedial action projects. This new measure better demonstrates ongoing progress and risk reduction at Superfund sites and provides the opportunity to better manage our cleanup program. We will be talking with USDA more about this new measure as we move forward toward the 2011 reporting date.

Thank you in advance for your efforts to work with EPA in ensuring that we continue to protect human health and the environment at Superfund NPL sites. I ask that your organization work with our regional offices, and the Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office (FFRRO), to continue efforts to achieve protective cleanups and utilize these measures to communicate our joint successes in doing so. FFRRO's Office Director is John Reeder and he can be reached at (703) 603-9089 or at [email protected]. You can also contact Gail A. Cooper, FFRRO' s Deputy Director and management lead for measures at (703) 603-0049 or at [email protected].

Assistant Adm nistrator

cc: John Reeder, FFRRO Gail A. Cooper, FFRRO James Woolford, OSRTI Superfund Regional National Program Managers, Regions I - X RCRA Regional National Program Managers, Regions I - X Federal Facility Program Managers, Regions I - X

mailto:[email protected]


JUL 1 2 2Gm

The Honorable Addison D. Davis IV Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environment,

Safety, and Occupational Health U.S. Department of the Army 110 Anny Pentagon, Rm 30453 Washington, D.C. 203 10-0 II 0

Dear Mr. Davis:

The purpose of thi s annual letter is to ensure close coordination between the U.S. Department of the Army (Army) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in meeting key Government Performance and Results Act COPRA) measures. As you know, EPA annually tracks accomplishments at Superfund NPL sites, of which Army NPL facilities are a part. These measures include: Human Exposure Environmental Indicator (El); Migration of Contaminated Groundwater (EI); Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use (SWRAU); Construction Completions (CC); and Five-Year Reviews (5YR). Although 5YRs are not GPRA measures, they are a very important activity and EPA reports annually to Congress our progress towards meeting these targets. Please see attached charts for site-specific data on these measures.

We appreciate the Anny's continued efforts to work with EPA to ensure that we are accurately capturing our progress toward protection of human health and the environment. In particular, I'd like to emphasize the importance of your Services' continued participation in the EPA/DoD Goal Hannonization Workgroup. Through this workgroup we hope to 1) better align our reporting metrics I measures, 2) develop ajoinl target setting process, 3) and improve our external metric communication and reporting. Eventually, we envision a closely aligned process for establishing goals and measuring progress of NPL cleanups.

• Environmental Indicators By the end of FY20JO, EPA has a nationally established overall goal of 148 Federal NPL

facilities (out of 173) achieving the Human Exposure Under Control EI status and 109 federal NPLfacililies achieving the Groundwater Migration Under Control E1 status. Using our FY2010 mid-year data, EPA believes that Human Exposure is Not Under Control or has Insufficient Data at 9 a/your 43 NPLfacilities (2/%). For your convenience, the complete fist is attached to this letter. Please provide us with a brief estimate of when (fiscal year) the Army expects these 9 installations to qualify as Hurna" Exposure Under Control.

Additionally, EPA believes that there are i6 Army NPL installations (out of 40 facilities with Groundwater) at which Groundwater Migration is Not Under Control or has insufficient Data (40%). Please provide us with your estimate o/when the Army expects these 16 installations to achieve a status 0/ Groundwater Migration Under Control.


agency. EPA measures acres with two distinct indicators: 1) Acres Protectedfor People (PFP) and 2) Acres Ready for Anticipated Use (RA U). Additionally, the Superfund program measures the number of sites which are Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use (SWRAU). Alliand-based Superfund acres are designated by Operable Unit (OU) or parcel.

The PFP designation is usedfor acres which are currently protective for human health (i.e. Human Exposure is Under Control). The RAU designation is usedfor acres which are protective for human health, all cleanup goals in the Decision Document(s) have been achieved, and all institutional controls (if necessary) have been put in place. Once all OUs or parcels have been deSignated as RA U, and the facility is already Construction Complete, the jnstallation meets the criteria for becoming SWRAU (for NPL sites only).

There are three Army NPLfacilities targetedfor SWRAU in FY2010. Please confirm that these three facilities will be able to reach this milestone this fiscal year. There is currently one Army Federal facility NPL installation which is planned to achieve this milestone in FY20il, and three in FY2012 (please see attached list). Please verify whether this planning data is accurate.

• Construction Completion As you are aware, EPA's CC measure is one of the primary tools used by EPA to report

the progress of cleanup activities. For FY20iO, there is one Army facility targeted to achieve this measure. EPA is currently showing that the Army will achieve one CC in FY20ii, and there are 2 facilities planned for FY20i2.

We are very interested in accurately and realistically projecting the achievement ofCCs at all Federalfacilities in the context of ensuring the protection of human health and the environment. Please respond confirming whether the Army agrees with the provided CC planning data, and the likelihood that these targeted candidates will achieve CC on, or be/ore, schedule.


remedy in order to determine if the remedy is, or will be, protective of human health and the environment. Nine Army 5YRs are targetedfor completion in FY20iO. Any 5YR listing highlighted in red in the chart below means that, as of mid-year FY201O, the report had not been finalized and was overdue. Please provide us with an explanation of why the Army believes these statutorily required Five-Year Reviews have not been completed.

In FY20iO, EPA's inspector General (IG) performed an audit on Federal Facility FiveYear Review reports, their associated data, their issues and Recommendations, timeliness of the reports, etc. The IG recommends that EPA improve its role in, and management of, Federal facility 5YRs. We have transmitted this report to you under separate cover.

The agency considers all of these measures of critical importance because they enable us to report to the public and Congress where actions have been taken to protect human health and the environment at Superfund NPL facilities. Achievement of these measures is based on a continually successful partnership between EPA and the Army. Many communities have expressed an interest in more transparency, and involvement in the cleanup of contaminated facilities. EPA is committed to implementing a management strategy to identify opportunities for more community involvement.

In addition, EPA is initiating an aggressive multi-year effort, called the Integrated Cleanup Initiative (lCI), to integrate and leverage its land cleanup authorities (i.e., Superfund Remedial, Removal , Federal Facilities, and Brownfields) to address a greater number of contaminated sites, accelerate cleanups, and put sites back into productive use while protecting human health and the environment. As a first step, EPA has committed to a new publicly reported performance measure in FY20 11 - an increase in completion of Superfund remedial action projects. This new measure better demonstrates ongoing progress and risk reduction at Superfund sites and provides the opportunity to better manage our cleanup program. We will be talking with the Army more about this new measure as we move forward toward the 2011 reporting date.

Thank you in advance for your efforts to work with EPA in ensuring that we continue to protect human health and the environment at Superfund NPL facilities. I ask that your organization work with our regional offices, and the Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office (FFRRO), to continue efforts to achieve protective cleanups and utilize these measures to communicate our joint successes in doing so. FFRRO's Office Director is John Reeder and he can be reached at (703) 603-9089 or at [email protected]. You can also contact Gail A. Cooper, FFRRO's Deputy Director and management lead for measures at (703) 603-0049 or at [email protected].

~ . err-

Stanis~ Assistant Administrator




FIVE YEAR REVIEWS

ARMY ACfUAL FYR DUE

MILAN

FINAL

2010 Count FORT DEVENS-SUDBURY TRAIN ING ANNEX DELETED

DELETED

20 11 09 CA RIVERBANK ARMY

201 1 10 AK FORT WAINWRIGHT FINAL 9/291201 1

9

2012 09 CA FORT ORO FIN AL 91251201 2 201 2 09 CA SACRAMENTO ARMY DEPOT FIN AL 91241201 2

201 2 09 HI SCHOFIELD BARRACKS (USARMY) DELETED 912412012

20 12 10 WA FORT LEWIS LOGISTICS CENTER FINAL 9/281201 2

2012 Count 8 Grand Count 26

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETIONS (as of April I, 2010)

FY 2010 Planned NPL Site Construction Completion

EPA Militan: State Facilitv Name

RC2ion Service 06 ARMY LA LOUISIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT

FY 2011 Planned NPL Site Construction Completions

EPA Militan: State Facilitv Name Re2ion Service

NEW BRIGHTON/ARDEN HILLSITCAAP 05 ARMY MN (USARMY)


EPA Militan: State Facility Name

Reo;on Service 04 ARMY AL ALABAMA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT 07 ARMY KS FORT RILEY

SITEWIDE READY FOR ANTICIPATED USE (as of April I, 2010) I FY 2010

Planned NPL Sitewide Ready-for-Reuse EPA

Rce:ion Milita:a Service

State Facilitv Name

05 ARMY IL JOLIET ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT (LOAD-ASSEMBLY-PACKING AREA)

05 ARMY IL JOLIET ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT

I (MANUFACTURING AREA) 10 ARMY WA FORT LEWIS (LANDFILL NO.5)

FY2011 Planned NPL Sitewide Ready-for-Reuse

EPA RCl!ion

Militan: Service

State Facility Name

06 ARMY LA LOUISIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT FY 2012


RCl!ion Militan: Service

State Facility Name

04 ARMY AL ALABAMA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT

05 ARMY MN NEW BRIGHTON/ARDEN HILLS/TCAAP (ARMYMY)

07 ARMY MO WELDON SPRING FORMER ARMY ORDNANCE WORKS

ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS <as of April!, 2010) ARMY

EPA I STATE I FACILITY NAME I NPL I HUMAN I GROUNDWATER

0 1 DEVENS FINAL HE CONTROL

0 1 MA FORT DEVENS-SUDBURY DELETED LONG TERM PROTECT

01 MA MATEruALSTECHNOLOGYLABORATORY DELETED LONG TERM PROTECT

01 MA NATICK LABORATORY ARMY RESEARCH, FINAL HE UNDER GMNOT AND ENG INEERING CENTER CONTROL DETERMINED

FORT DlX FINAL LONG TERM GM UNDER PROTECT

ABERDEEN

03 MD FORT DETRlCK AREA B GROUND WATER FINAL

03 MD FORT GEORGE G. MEADE FINAL

CONTROL

LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT (PDO AREA) FINAL

FINAL

ARMY EPA

REGION FACILITY NAME NPL

STATUS HUMAN EXPOSURE

GROUNDWATER

~~O~J--

PA

~~V~A--~

ARMY DEPOT

FO~RT~E~U~ST~I~S~(U~S~A~R~M~Y~) --------------~

FINAL HE CONTROLLEO, PROT. REM.

F~m~A~L--~

GM UNDER CONTROL ~--------~

UNDER CONTROL

GM UNDER CONTROL

OJ WV WEST VIRGmlA ORDNANCE

FINAL

FmAL TERM PROTECT

INDUSTRIAL AREA)

04 TN MLLAN ARMY AMMUN ITLON PLANT

05 IL JOLIET ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT (LOAD

f-,, __ --j--..----t-;;A'USSEM BL Y -PACKmG AREA)

(USARMY)

PLANT

TX LONE STAR ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT FLNAL LONG TERM PROTECT

GM UNDER CONTROL

ARMY

EPA NPL HUMAN GROUNDWATER

07

STATUS EXPOSURE MIGRATION

09 CA

09 CA SACRAMENTO ARMY CONTROL CONTROL

ARMY

EPA REGION STATE FACILITY NAME

NPL STATUS

HUMAN EXPOSURE

GROUNDWATER MIGRATION

09 HI SCHOFIELD BARRACKS (USARMY) DELETED LONG TERM PROTECT

GM UNDER CONTROL

10 AK FORT RlCHARDSON (USARMY) FINAL HE CONTROLLED, PROT. REM.

GM UNDER CONTROL

10 AK FORT WAINWRIGHT FINAL HE UNDER CONTROL

GMNOT DETERMINED

\0 OR UMATILLA ARMY DEPOT (LAGOONS) FINAL HE UNDER CONTROL

GM UNDER CONTROL

10 WA FORT LEWIS (LANDFILL NO.5) DELETED LONG TERM PROTECT

NOTAGM SITE

10 WA FORT LEWIS LOGISTICS CENTER FINAL HE UNDER CONTROL

GM UNDER CONTROL

\0 WA HAMILTON ISLAND LANDFILL (USA/COE) DELETED LONG TERM PROTECT

NOT AGM SITE

JUl 1 2 2010

The Honorable Olga Dominguez Assistant Administrator Office of Infrastructure National Aeronautics and Space Administration Two Independence Square 300 E Street, SW, Suite 4074 Washington, D.C. 20546

Dear Ms. Dominguez:

The purpose of this annual letter is to ensure close coordination between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in meeting key Government Perfonnance and Results Act (OPRA) measures. As you know, EPA annually tracks accomplishments at Superfund NPL sites, of which NASA NPL sites are a part. These measures include: Human Exposure Environmental Indicator (EI); Migration of Contaminated Groundwater (EI); Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use (SWRAU); Construction Completions (CC); and Five-Year Reviews (SYR). Although SYRs are not GPRA measures, they are a very important activity and EPA reports annually to Congress our progress towards meeting these targets. Please see attached charts for site-specific data on these measures.

We appreciate NASA's continued efforts to work with EPA to ensure that we are accurately capturing our progress toward protection of human health and the environment. Below is a status update of the aforementioned measures:

• Environmental Indicators By the end oj FY2010, EPA has a nationally established overall goal oj 148 Federal NPL

sites (out of 173) achieving the Human Exposure Under Control EI status and J09 federal NPL sites achieVing the Groundwater Migration Under Control EI status. Using our FY2010 midyear data, EPA believes that Human Exposure is Under Control at LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE/NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER and JET PROPULSION LABORATORY

However, EPA believes that there is Insufficient Data to make a Groundwater Migration determination at LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE/NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER. The Groundwater Migration status at JET PROPULSION LABORATORY is Under Control. Please provide us with your estimate of when NASA expects LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASEINASA

LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER to achieve a status o/Groundwater Migration Under Control.


agency. EPA measures acres with two distinct indicators: i) Acres Protected/or People (PFP) and 2) Acres Ready/or Anticipated Use (RA U). Additionally, the Superfund program measures the number 0/ sites which are SWRA U. All land-based Superfund acres are designated by Operable Unit (aU) or parcel.

The PFP designation is usedfor acres which are currently protective/or human health (i.e. Human Exposure is Under Control). The RAU designation is usedfor acres which are protective for human health, all cleanup goals in the Decision Document(s) have been achieved, and all institutional controls (if necessary) have been put in place. Once all au's or parcels have been designated as RA U, and the facility is already Construction Complete, the installation meets the criteria/or becoming SWRAU (for NPL sites only).

Neither NASA NPL sile is currently targetedfor a SWRAU accomplishment in the near future.

• Construction Completion As you are aware, EPA's CC measure is one a/the primary tools used by EPA to report

the progress 0/ cleanup activities. We are very interested in accurately and realistically projecting the achievement o/ces at all Federal sites in the context a/ensuring the protection 0/ human health and the enviranment. LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE/NASA LANGLEY RESEA RCH CENTER is currently planned to achieve CC in FY20J 2. Please respond with NASA's assessment 0/ the likelihood that the CC will occur on, or before, schedule at LANGLEY.


remedy in order to determine iflhe remedy is, or will be, protective of human health and the environment. One NASA 5YRs is targeted/or completion in FY20JO. Any 5YR listing highlighted in red in the charI below means that, as of mid-year FY20JO, the report had not been finalized and was overdue. Please provide us wilh all explallalion of why NASA believes this statutorily required Five-Year Review, due ill 2003, has nol been compleled.

In FY20iO, EPA 's inspector General (IG) performed an audit on Federal Facility FiveYear Review reports, their associated data, their Issues and Recommendations, timeliness of the reports, etc. The IG recommends that EPA improve its role in, and management of, Federal facility 5YRs. We have transmitted this report to you under separate cover.

The agency considers all of these measures of critical importance because they enable us to report to the public and Congress where actions have been taken to protect human health and the envirorunent at Superfund NPL sites, Achievement of these measures is based on a continually successful partnership between EPA and NASA. Many communities have expressed

an interest in more transparency, and involvement in the cleanup of contaminated sites. EPA is committed to implementing a management strategy to identify opportunities for more community involvement.

In addition, EPA is initiating an aggressive multi-year effort, called the Integrated Cleanup Initiative (lCI), to integrate and leverage its land cleanup authorities (i.e., Superfund Remedial, Removal, Federal Sites, and Brownfields) to address a greater number of contaminated sites, accelerate cleanups, and pu.t sites back into productive use while protecting human health and the environment. As a first step, EPA has committed to a new publicly reported perfonnance measure in FY2011 - an increase in completion of Superfund remedial action projects. This new measure better demonstrates ongoing progress and risk reduction at Superfund sites and provides the opportunity to better manage our cleanup program. We will be talking with NASA more about this new measure as we move forward toward the 2011 reporting date.

Thank you in advance for your efforts to work with EPA in ensuring that we continue to protect human health and the environment at Superfund NPL sites. I ask that your organization work with our regional offices, and the Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office (FFRRO), to continue efforts to achieve protective cleanups and utilize these measures to communicate our joint successes in doing so. FFRRO's Office Director is John Reeder and he can be reached at (703) 603-9089 or at [email protected]. You can also contact Gail A. Cooper, FFRRO's Deputy Director and management lead for measures at (703) 603-0049 or at [email protected].

ee: John Reeder, FFRRO Gail A, Cooper, FFRRO James Woolford, OSRTI Superfund Regional National Program Managers, Regions I - X RCRA Regional National Program Managers, Regions I - X Federal Facility Program Managers, Regions I - X



ACTUAL FYR DUE

~~LEYRESEiii~~~ 03 VA

2010 Count

FINAL

Grand 3

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETIONS (as of April I, 2010) FY2012

EPA Rel!ion

Planned NPL Site Construction Completions Militaa Service

State Facilitv Name

LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASEINASA LANGLEY 03 NASA VA RESEARCH CENTER

ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS (as of April I, 2010)

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA)

EPA NPL HUMAN GROUNDWATER REGION STATE FACILITY NAME STATUS EXPOSURE MIGRATION

03 VA LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASEINASA LANGLEY FINAL HE UNDER GMNOT RESEARCH CENTER CONTROL DETERMINEO

09 CA JET PROPULSION LABORATORY (NASA) FINAL HE UNDER GM UNDER CONTROL CONTROL

JUL 1 2 ,C:C

Mr. Russell Dyer Restoration Branch Chief U.S. Air National Guard NGBlA70R Conaway Hall 3500 Fetchet Avenue Andrews AFB, Maryland 20762-5157

Dear Mr. Dyer:

The purpose of this annual letter is to ensure close coordination between the U.S. Air National Guard (ANG) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in meeting key Government Performance and Results Act (OPRA) measures. As you know, EPA annually tracks accomplishments at Superfund NPL sites, of which ANG NPL facilities are a part. These measures include: Human Exposure Environmental Indicator (EI); Migration of Contaminated Groundwater (EI) ; Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use (SWRAU); Construction Completions (CC); and Five-Year Reviews (5YR). Although 5YRs are not GPRA measures, they are a very important activity and EPA reports annually to Congress our progress towards meeting these targets.

We appreciate ANG's continued efforts to work with EPA to ensure that we are accurately capturing our progress toward protection of human health and the environment. Below is a status update of the aforementioned measures:

• Environmentallndicators By the end of FY201 0, EPA has a nationally established overall goal of 1 48 Federal NPL

facilities (OUI of 173) achieving the Human Exposure Under Control EI status and 109 federal NPLjacilities achieving the Groundwater Migration Under Control EJ status. EPA believes that Human Exposure;s Under Control at OTIS AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE/CAMP EDWARDS. Additionally, EPA also believes that Groundwater Migration is Under Control at OTIS AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE/CAMP EDWARDS.


agency. EPA measures acres with two distinct indicators: 1) Acres Protectedfor People (PFP) and 2) Acres Ready jor Anticipated Use (RA U). Additionally, the Superfund program measures

the number of sites which are Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use (SWRA U). AlIland-based Superfund acres are designated by Operable Unit (OU) or parcel.

The PFP designation is usedfor acres which are currently protective for human health (i.e. Human Exposure is Under Control). The RAU designation is used/or acres which are protective/or human health, all cleanup goals in the Decision Document(s) have been achieved, and all institutional controls (if necessary) have been put in place. Once all OU's or parcels have been designated as RA V, and the facility is already Construction Complete, the installation meets the criteria/or becoming SWRAU (for NPL sites only).

We are happy to report that OTIS AIR NATIONAL GUA RD BASE/CAMP EDWARDS achieved the status ofSWRAU in FY20IO.


the progress of cleanup activities. We are very interested in accurately and realistically projecting the achievement ofCCs at all Federal facilities in the context 0/ ensuring the protection o/human health and the environment. We are pleased to report that OTIS AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE/CAMP EDWARDS achieved its CC in FY20IO.


remedy in order to determine if the remedy is, or will be, protective of human health and the environment. OTIS AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE/CAMP EDWARDS is not due to have another 5 YR completed within the next few years.

In FY2010, EPA 's Inspector General (IG) performed an audit on Federal Facility FiveYear Review reports, their associated data, their Issues and Recommendations, timeliness o/the reports, etc. The IG recommends that EPA improve its role in, and management of, Federal facility 5YRs. We have transmilted this report to you under separate cover.

The agency considers all of these measures of critical importance because they enable us to report to the public and Congress where actions have been taken to protect human health and the environment at Superfund NPL facilities. Achievement of these measures is based on a continually successful partnership between EPA and the ANG. Many communities have expressed an interest in more transparency, and involvement in the cleanup of contaminated facilities. EPA is committed to implementing a management strategy to identify opportunities for more community involvement.

In addition, EPA is initiating an aggressive multi-year effort, called the Integrated Cleanup Initiative (ICI), to integrate and leverage its land cleanup authorities (i.e., Superfund Remedial , Removal, Federal Facilities, and Brownfields) to address a greater number of contaminated sites, acce lerate cleanups, and put sites back into productive use while protecting human health and the environment. As a first step, EPA has committed to a new publicly reported performance measure in FY2011 - an increase in completion of Superfund remedial action projects. This new measure better demonstrates ongoing progress and risk reduction at

Superfund sites and provides the opportunity to better manage our cleanup program. We will be talking with the ANG more about this new measure as we move forward toward the 2011 reporting date.

Thank you in advance for your efforts to work with EPA in ensuring that we continue to protect human health and the environment at Superfund NPL facilities. I ask that your organization work with our Regional offices, and the Federal Faci lities Restoration and Reuse Office (FFRRO), to continue efforts to achieve protective cleanups and utilize these measures to communicate our joint successes in doing so. FFRRO's Office Director is John Reeder and he can be reached at (703) 603-9089 or at [email protected]. You can also contact Gail A. Cooper, FFRRO' s Deputy Director and management lead for measures at (703) 603-0049 or at [email protected].

cc: John Reeder, FFRRO Gail A. Cooper, FFRRO James Woolford, OSRTI Superfund Regional National Program Managers, Regions I - X ReRA Regional National Program Managers, Regions I - X Federal Facility Program Managers, Regions I - X



JUL 1 2 2010

The Honorable Wilma A Lewis Assistant Secretary U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, NW Washington, D.C, 20240

Dear Ms. Lewis:

The purpose of this annual letter is to ensure close coordination between the U.S. Department of Interior (001) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in meeting key Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) measures. As you know, EPA annually tracks accomplishments at Superfund NPL sites, of which DOl NPL sites are a part. These measures include: Human Exposure Environmental Indicator (EI); Migration of Contaminated Groundwater (El); Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use (SWRAU); Construction Completions (CC); and Five-Year Reviews (5YR). Although 5YRs are not GPRA measures, they are a very important activity and EPA reports annually to Congress our progress towards meeting these targets.

We appreciate DOl ' s continued efforts to work with EPA to ensure that we are accurately capturing our progress toward protection of human health and the environment. Below is a status update of the aforementioned measures:

• Environmental Indicators By the end of FY201O, EPA has a nationally established overall goal of 148 Federal NPL

sites (OUI of 173) achieving the Human Exposure Under Control EI status and /09 federal NPL sites achieving the Groundwater Migration Under Control EI status. Using our FY20JO midyear dara, EPA believes thaI there ;s Insufficient Dala to make a Human Exposure status determination at SANGAMO ELECTRIC DUMP/CRAB ORCHARD NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE. EPA believes that the LEE ACRES LANDFILL site is Human Exposure Under Control. Please provide liS witll a brief estimate 0/ wilen (fiscal year) DOl expects tile CRAB ORCHARD site to qualify as Human Exposure Under Control.

Additionally, EPA believes thaI there ;s InsuffiCient Data to make a Groundwater Migration status determination at SANGAMO ELECTRIC DUMP/CRAB ORCHARD NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE. EPA believes that the LEE ACRES LANDFILL site is Groundwater Migration Under Control. Please provide us witll a brie/ estimate o/wllen (FIScal

year) DOl expects the CRAB ORCHARD site to qualify as Groundwater Migration Under Control.

• Sitewidc Ready for Anticipated Use EPA's Superfund program has its own acreage measure independent of any stale or

agency. EPA measures acres with two distinct indicators: I) Acres Protectedfor People (PFP) and 2) Acres Ready for Anticipated Use (RAU). Additionally, the Superfund program measures the number of sites which are Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use (SWRAU). Allland-based Superfund acres are designated by Operable Unit (OU) or parcel.

The PFP designation is usedfor acres which are currently protective for human health (i.e. Human Exposure is Under Control). The RAU designation is usedfor acres which are protective for human health, all cleanup goals in the Decision Document(s) have been achieved, and all institutional controls (if necessary) have been put in place. Once all OU's or parcels have been designated as RAU, and the facility is already Construction Complete, the installation meets the criteria for becoming SWRAU (for NPL sites only).

LEE ACRES LANDFILL site achieved SWRAU in FY2007. However, SANGAMO ELECTRIC DUMP/CRAB ORCHARD NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE is not currently scheduled to achieve this measure over the next several years.


the progress of cleanup activi/ies. For FY20J 0, there is one facility targeted to achieve this measure. EPA is currently showing thaI DOl will achieve zero CCs in FY201 J, but there are 4 sites planned to achieve this measure in FY20J 2.

LEE ACRES LANDFILL site achieved CC in FY2005. However, SANGAMO ELECTRIC DUMP/CRAB ORCHARD NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE is not currently scheduled to achieve this measure until FY2017. Please verifY whether or not the planning date for Crab Orchard is accurate.


remedy in order to determine if the remedy is, or will be, protective of human health and the environment. LEE ACRES LANDFILL completed its 5YR in FY20IO, and SANGAMO ELECTRIC DUMP/CRAB ORCHARD NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE has an upcoming 5YR to be completed by FY2011.

In FY20JO, EPA's Inspector General (lG) performed an audit on Federal Facility FiveYear Review reports, their associated data, their Issues and Recommendations, timeliness of the reports, etc. The IG recommends that EPA improve its role in, and management of, Federal facility 5YRs. We have transmitted this report to you under separate cover.

The agency considers all of these measures of critical importance because they enable us to report to the public and Congress where actions have been taken to protect human health and

the environment at Superfund NPL sites. Achievement of these measures is based on a continually successful partnership between EPA and 001. Many communities have expressed an interest in more transparency, and involvement in the cleanup of contaminated sites. EPA is committed to implementing a management strategy to identify opportunities for more community involvement.

In addition, EPA is initiating an aggressive multi-year effort, called the Integrated Cleanup Initiative (ICI), to integrate and leverage its land cleanup authorities (i.e., Superfund Remedial, Removal, Federal Sites, and 8rownfields) to address a greater number of contaminated sites, accelerate cleanups, and put sites back into productive use while protecting human health and the environment. As a first step, EPA has committed to a new publicly reported performance measure in FY20 II - an increase in completion of Superfund remedial action projects. This new measure better demonstrates ongoing progress and risk reduction at Superfund sites and provides the opportunity to better manage our cleanup program. We will be talking with DOl more about this new measure as we move forward toward the 2011 reporting date.

Thank you in advance for your efforts to work with EPA in ensuring that we continue to protect human health and the environment at Superfund NPL sites. I ask that your organization work with our regional offices, and the Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office (FFRRO), to continue efforts to achieve protective cleanups and utilize these measures to communicate our joint successes in doing so. FFRRO's Office Director is John Reeder and he can be reached at (703) 603-9089 or at [email protected]. You can also contact Gail A. Cooper, FFRRO's Deputy Director and management lead for measures at (703) 603-0049 or at [email protected].

lMli!\i4'strofl,l,Jj;lus>---Assi tant dministrator

cc: Jo~ Reeder, FFRRO Gail A. Cooper, FFRRO James Woolford, OSRTI Superfund Regional National Program Managers, Regions I - X RCRA Regional National Program Managers, Regions I - X Federal Facility Program Managers, Regions I - X



JUl 1 2 2010

The Honorable Michael McGhee Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary Energy. Environment, Safety and Occupational Health Secretary of the Air Force 1665 Ai r Force Pentagon, Rm 4B941 Washington, D.C. 20330- 1665

Dear Mr. McGhee:

The purpose of this annual letter is to ensure close coordination between the United States Air Force (Air Force) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in meeting key Government Perfonnance and Results Act COPRA) measures. As yOll know, EPA annually tracks accomplishments at Superfund NPL si tes, orwhich Air Force NPL facilities arc a part. These measures include: Human Exposure Environmental Indicator (EI); Migration of Contaminated Groundwater (EI); Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use (SWRAU); Construction Completions (CC); and Five-Year Reviews (5YR). Although 5YRs are not GPRA measures, they are a very important activity and EPA reports annually to Congress our progress towards meeting these targets. Please see attached charts for site-specific data on these measures.

We appreciate the Air Force's continued efforts to work with EPA to ensure that we are accurately capturing our progress toward protection of human health and the environment. In particular, I ' d like to emphasize the importance of your Services' continued participation in the EPA/DoD Goal Harmonization Workgroup. Through this workgroup we hope to I) better align our reporting metrics/measures, 2) develop a joint target setting process, 3) and improve our external metric communication and report ing. Eventually, we envision a closely aligned process for establishing goals and measuring progress ofNPL cleanups.

• Environmental Indicators By the end of FY2010, EPA has a nationally established overall goal of 148 Federal NPL

facilities (out of 173) achieving the Human Exposure Under Control E1 status and 109 federal NPLfacilities achieving the Groundwater Migration Under Control El status. Using our FY2010 mid-year data, EPA believes that Human Exposure is Not Under Control or has Insufficient Data at 5 o/your 37 NPLfacilities (14%). For your convenience, the complete list is attached to this leller. Please provide liS witlt a brief estimate of wit ell (fiscal year) tlte Air Force expects tltese 5 illstallations to qllalify as Hilmall Exposure U"der Control.

Additionally, EPA believes that there are 5 Air Force NPL installations (out of 37 facilities with Groundwater) at which Groundwater Migration is Not Vnder Control or has Insufficient Data (J 4%). Please provide us with your estimate of when the Air Force expects these 5 installations to achieve a status o/Groundwater Migration Under Control.


agency. EPA measures acres with two distinci indicators: /} Acres Protectedfor People (PFP) and 2} Acres Ready for Anticipated Vse (RAU). Additionally, the Superfund program measures the number of sites which are Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Vse (SWRA V). AlIland-based Superfund acres are designated by Operable Vnit (OU) or parcel.

The PFP designation is usedfor acres which are currently protective/or human health (i.e. Human Exposure is Under Control). The RAU designation is usedfor acres which are protective for human health, all cleanup goals in the Decision Document(s} have been achieved, and all institutional controls (if necessary) have been put in place. Once all OUs or parcels have been designated as RA V, and the facility is already Construction Complete, the installation meets the criteria/or becoming SWRAV (for NPL sites only).

There is one Air Force NPLfacility targeted/or SWRAV in FY20iO. Please confirm that this facility will be able to reach this milestone this fiscal year. There are currently zero Air Force Federalfacility NPL installations planned to achieve this milestone in FY20li, and three in FY20]2 (please see attached list). Please verify whether this planning data is accurate.

• Construction Completion As you are aware, EPA 's CC measure is one of the primary tools used by EPA to report

the progress 0/ cleanup activities. For FY2010 and FY2011, EPA is currently showing that the Air Force will achieve zero CCs. However, there is one/acility planned to achieve this measure in FY20J 2.

We are very inlerested in accurately and realistically projecting the achievement olCCs at all Federal/acilities in the context 0/ ensuring the protection a/human health and the environment. Please respond confirming whether or not the Air Force agrees with the provided CC planning data, and the likelihood that the one FY2012 candidate will achieve CC on, or before, schedule.


remedy in order to determine if the remedy is, or will be, protective of human health and the environment. Ten Air Force 5YRs are targetedfor completion in FY2010. Any 5YR listing highlighted in red in the chart below means that, as o/mid-year FY20IO, the report had not been finalized and was overdue. Please provide us with an explanation a/why the Air Force believes these statutorily required Five- Year Reviews have not been completed.

In FY20JO, EPA's Inspector General (lG) performed an audit on Federal Facility FiveYear Review reports, their associated data, their Issues and Recommendations, timeliness of the

reports, etc. The 10 recommends that EPA improve its role in, and management of, Federal facility 5YRs. We have transmitted this report to YOllllnder separate cover.

The agency considers all of these measures of critical importance because they enable us to report to the public and Congress where actions have been taken to protect human health and the environment at Superfund NPL facilities. Achievement of these measures is based on a continually successful partnership between EPA and the Air Force. Many communities have expressed an interest in more transparency, and involvement in the cleanup of contaminated facilities. EPA is committed to implementing a management strategy to identify opportunities for more community involvement.

In addition, EPA is initiating an aggressive multi-year effort, called the Integrated Cleanup Initiative (lCI), to integrate and leverage its land cleanup authorities (i.e., Superfund Remedial, Removal, Federal Faci lities, and Brownfields) to address a greater number of contaminated sites, accelerate cleanups, and put sites back into productive use while protecting human health and the environment. As a first step, EPA has committed to a new publicly reported performance measure in FY20 II - an increase in completion of Superfund remedial action projects. This new measure better demonstrates ongoing progress and risk reduction at Superfund sites and provides the opportunity to better manage our cleanup program. We will be talking with the Air Force more about this new measure as we move forward toward the 2011 reporting date.

Thank you in advance for your efforts to work with EPA in ensuring that we continue to protect human health and the environment at Superfund NPL faci lities. I ask that your organization work with our regional offices, and the Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office (FFRRO), to continue efforts to achieve protective cleanups and utilize these measures to communicate our joint successes in doing so. FFRRO' s Office Director is John Reeder and he can be reached at (703) 603-9089 or at [email protected]. You can also contact Gail A. Cooper, FFRRO's Deputy Director and management lead for measures at (703) 603-0049 or at [email protected] .

.. ~~As istant dministrator




AlRr' Five Year I a~ ~f A::ll, 2010

ACTUAL FYR DUE , FV, REG ' NAME

2010 01 ME LORJNG AIR FORCE BASE

NPL DATE

FINAL 911 /2010

2010 02 NY AIR BASE(II ARPA <' FINAL

2010 02 NY p, ATn", 'Rr., I AIR ' BASE FINAL 11 / 1912009

2010 04 FL 'AIR i BASE FINAL ""n n,n

20 10 04 FL 'AIR ' BASE

2010 08 SO FU , I AIR , BASE

20 10 08 WY FE WARR eN AIR , BASE

2010 09 CA MATHER AIR FORCE BASE (Ar"W

20 10 09 CA NORTON AIR FORCE BASE (LNOFLL #2)

FINAL

FINAL

""" _ SITE) "'00

FINAL ,"=

9120/20 I 0

2010 10 WA AMERICAN LAKE GARDENS/MCCHORD AFB FINAL

2010 Co.n' m,,, 2011 03 MO AIR ; BASE

2011 04 GA : AIR FORCE BASE , " muonGF FINAL

10

I in2/2" I "

II

20 11 05 OH WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE FINAL

2011 09 AZ WILLIAMS AIR FORCE BASE FINAL

2011 09 CA r-nWARn< AIR FORCE BASE FINAL

121912010

9/ 1912011

9/2812011

2011 09 CA : A

2011 10 ID MOll"T< "

IR FORCE BASE

I HOME AIR : BASE

FINAL

FINAL

2/6/2011

II

2011 Co.n' 7

2012 01 MA

201 2 06 OK TINKER AIR

AIR

i BASE (SOLDIER ,

, BASE FINAL

I niNe] 300 I) FINAL

12 )1 2

2012 Co.n'

~:~~~ 2,

19

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETIONS (as of April I, 2010) FY 2012

Planned NPL Site Construction Comnletions EPA

R;;ion Militan: Service

AIR

State Facility Name

02 FORCE NY PLATTSBURGH AIR FORCE BASE

SIT E WIDE READ Y FOR ANTICIPATED USE (as of Anrill, 2010) FY2010

Planned NPL Sitewide Readv~ror-Reuse EPA Military

State Facilitv Name Re;ion Service AIR MATHER AIR FORCE BASE (AC&W

09 FORCE CA DISPOSAL SITE) FY2012

EPA Militan: Reuion Service

AIR

Planned NPL Sitcwide Rcadv-for·Reuse

State Facility Name

04 FORCE AIR

FL HOMESTEAD AIR FORCE BASE

05 FORCE AIR

OH WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE

10 FORCE WA AMERICAN LAKE GARDENS/MCCHORD AFB

AIR FORCE EPA NPL HUMAN GROUNDWATER

TUS EXPOSURE MIGRATION 01 MA HANSCOM FIELD/HANSCOM AIR FORCE BASE FINAL HE UNDER GM UNDER

CONTROL CONTROL

01 ME LORING AIR FORCE BASE FINAL HE CONTROLLED, GM UN DER PROT. REM. CONTROL

01 NH PEASE AIR FORCE BASE FINAL HE CONTROLLED, GM UNDER PROT. REM. CONTROL

02 NJ MCGUIRE AIR FORCE BASE # 1 FINAL DETERMINED DETERMINED

02 NY GRIFF ISS AIR FORCE BASE ( I I FINAL HE UNDER GM UNDER CONTROL CONTROL

02 NY PLATTSBURGH AIR FORCE BASE FINAL HE UNDER GM UNDER CONTROL CONTROL

FINAL CONTROL

FINAL HE CONTROL

FINAL PROT. REM.

FINAL

AIR FINAL

FINAL #4/SLUDGE LAGOON)

TWIN CITlES AIR FORCE RESERVE BASE DELETED HE (SMALL ARMS RANGE LANDFILL) PROT. REM . CONTROL

EPA NPL HUMAN GROUNDWATER REGION TE

05 OH

06 OK TINKER AIR FORCE BASE (SOLDIER CREEK/BUILDING 3001) CONTROL CONTROL

06 TX AIR FORCE PLANT #4 (GENERAL DYNAMICS) FINAL HE GMUNDER CONTROL CONTROL

CO AIR FORCE PLANT PJKS FINAL I·IE UNDER GMUNDER CONTROL CONTROL

ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE FINAL HE CONTROLLED, GMUNDER PROT. REM. CONTROL

UT HILL AIR FORCE BASE FINAL GMUNDER CONTROL

08 WY F.E. WARREN AIR FORCE BASE FINAL

09 AZ LUKE AIR FORCE BASE DELETED LONG TERM PROTECT

AZ WILLIAMS AIR FORCE BASE FINAL HE UNDER CONTROL

AIR FORCE BASE (6 AREAS) FINAL LONG TERM GM UNDER PROTECT CONTROL

AIR FORCE BASE FINAL HE UNDER GM UNDER CONTROL CONTROL

AIR BASE FINAL HE UNDER GM UNDER CONTROL CONTROL

FINAL HE UNDER GM UNDER CONTROL CONTROL

AIR FORCE


MATHER A IR BASE (AC& W DISPOSAL SITE)

AIR WATER CONTAMINA nON)

NPL STATUS

FINAL

FINAL

FINAL

HUMAN

HE UNDER CONTROL

HE UNDER CONTROL


GM UNDER CONTROL

GM UNDER CONTROL

UNDER CONTROL

GM UNDER CONTROL

10 AK ELMENDORF AIR FORCE BASE

10 ID MOUNTAIN HOME AIR FORCE BASE

10 WA AMERlCAN LAKE GARDENS/MCCHORD AFB

10 WA FAIRCHILD AIR FORCE BASE (4 WASTE AREAS)

10 WA MCCHORD AIR FORCE BASE (WASH RACKffREATMENT AREA)

FINAL

FINAL

FINAL

FINAL

DELETED

GM UNDER CONTROL

DETERMINED

HE UNDER CONTROL

HE UNDER CONTROL

HE CONTROLLED, PROT. REM.

GM UNDER CONTROL

GM UNDER CONTROL

GMUNDER CONTROL

GM UNDER CONTROL

GM UNDER CONTROL

JUl 1 2 2010

The Honorable Lynne A. Osmus Assistant Administrator for

Security and Hazardous Materials U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Room 300 Easl Washington, D.C. 20591

Dear Ms. Osmus:

The purpose of this annual letter is to ensure close coordination between the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in meeting key Government Perfonnance and Results Act (OPRA) measures. As you know, EPA annually tracks accomplishments at Superfund NPL sites, of which DOT NPL sites are a part. These measures include: Human Exposure Environmental Indicator (El); Migration of Contaminated Groundwater (EI); Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use (SWRAU); Construction Completions (CC); and Five~ Year Reviews (5YR). Although 5YRs are not GPRA measures, they are a very important activity and EPA reports annually to Congress our progress towards meeting these targets.

We appreciate DOT's continued efforts to work with EPA to ensure that we are accurately capturing our progress toward protection of human health and the environment. Below is a status update ofthe aforementioned measures:

• Environmental Indicators By the end oJFY20IO, EPA has a nationally established overall goal oj 148 Federal NPL

sites (out 0/173) achieving the Human Exposure Under Control EI status and 109 federal NPL sites achieving the Groundwater Migration Under Control E1 status. Using our FY2010 midyear data, EPA believes that Human Exposure is Under Control at FEDERAL A VIA TION ADMINISTRATION TECHNICAL CENTER and at STANDARD STEEL & METAL SALVAGE YARD. Additionally, EPA also believes that Groundwater Migration is Under Control at FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION TECHNICAL CENTER and at STANDARD STEEL & METAL SALVAGE YARD.


agency. EPA measures acres with two distinct indicators: 1) Acres Protected/or People (PFP)

and 2) Acres Ready for Anticipated Use (RAU). Additionally, the Superfund program measures the number of sites which are Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use (SWRAU). Allland-based Superfund acres are designated by Operable Unit (aU) or parcel.

The PFP designation is usedfor acres which are currently protective for human health (i.e. Human Exposure is Under Control). The RAU designation is usedfor acres which are protective for human health, all cleanup goals in the Decision Document(s) have been achieved, and all institutional controls (if necessary) have been put in place. Once all OU's or parcels have been designated as RA U, and the facility is already Construction Complete, the site meets the criteria for becoming SWRAU (for NPL sites only).

STANDARD STEEL & METAL SALVAGE YARD achieved SWRAU in FY2008, however, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION TECHNICAL CENTER is not scheduled to achieve this measure within the next several years.


the progress of cleanup activities. We are very interested in accurately and realistically projecting the achievement ofCCs at all Federal NPL sites in the context of ensuring the protection a/human health and the environment. STANDARD STEEL & METAL SALVAGE YARD achieved CC in FYI999, however, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION TECHNICAL CENTER is not scheduled to achieve this measure within the next several years.

• Five· Year Reviews Five-Year Reviews are conducted to evaluate the implementation and performance of a

remedy in order to determine if the remedy is, or will be, protective of human health and the environment. However, neither STANDARD STEEL & METAL SALVAGE YARD nor FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION TECHNICAL CENTER are scheduled/or another 5YR completion over the next couple years.

In FY2010, EPA's Inspector General (IG) peljormed an audit on Federal Facility FiveYear Review reports, their associated data, their Issues and Recommendations, timeliness of the reports, etc. The IG recommends that EPA improve its role in, and management of, Federal facility 5YRs. We have transmitted this report to you under separate cover.

The agency considers all of these measures of critical importance because they enable us to report to the public and Congress where actions have been taken to protect human health and the environment at Superfund NPL sites. Achievement of these measures is based on a continually successful partnership between EPA and the DOT. Many communities have expressed an interest in more transparency, and involvement in the cleanup of contaminated sites. EPA is committed to implementing a management strategy to identify opportunities for more community involvement.

In addition, EPA is initiating an aggressive multi-year effort, called the Integrated Cleanup Initiative (ICI), to integrate and leverage its land cleanup authorities (i.e., Superfund Remedial, Removal, Federal Sites, and Brownfields) to address a greater number of

contaminated sites, accelerate cleanups, and put sites back into productive use while protecting human health and the environment. As a first step, EPA has committed to a new publicly reported perfonnance measure in FY2011 - an increase in completion of Superfund remedial action projects. This new measure better demonstrates ongoing progress and risk reduction at Superfund sites and provides the opportunity to better manage our cleanup program. We will be talking with the DOT more about this new measure as we move forward toward the 20 11 reporting date.

Thank you in advance for your efforts to work with EPA in ensuring that we continue to protect human health and the environment at Superfund NPL sites. I ask that your organization work with our regional offices, and the Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office (FFRRO), to continue efforts to achieve protective cleanups and utilize these measures to communicate our joint successes in doing so. FFRRO's Office Director is John Reeder and he can be reached at (703) 603-9089 or at reeder_jollll@epa_gov, You can also contact Gail A, Cooper, FFRRO's Deputy Director and management lead for measures at (703) 603-0049 or at cooper.gailann@J!pa.gov.

cc: Jobn Reeder, FFRRO Gail A. Cooper, FFRRO James Woolford, OSRTI Superfund Regional National Program Managers, Regions I - X ReRA Regional National Program Managers, Regions I - X Federal Facility Program Managers, Regions I - X



,lUt J 2 2010

Rear Admiral Thomas P. Ostebo Assistant Commandant

for Engineering and Logistics United States Coast Guard 1900 Half Street, SW Washinglon, D.C. 20593-000 I

Dear Admiral Ostebo:

The purpose of this annual letter is to ensure close coordination between the United States Coast Guard (USaC) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in meeting key Government Perfonnance and Results Act (GPRA) measures. As you know, EPA annually tracks accomplishments at Superfund NPL sites, of which USGC NPL facilities are a part. These measures include: Human Exposure Environmental Indicator (EI); Migration of Contaminated Groundwater (El); Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use (SWRAU); Construction Completions (CC); and Five-Year Reviews (5YR). Although 5YRs are not GPRA measures, they are a very important activity and EPA reports annually to Congress our progress towards meeting these targets.

We appreciate USGC's continued efforts to work with EPA to ensure that we are accurately capturing our progress toward protection of human health and the environment. Below is a status update of the aforementioned measures:

• Environmental Indicators By rhe end of FY2010, EPA hos 0 nationally esrablished overall goal of 148 Federal NPL

facilities (out of 173) achieving the Human Exposure Under Control E1 status and 109 federal NPLfacUities achieving the Groundwater Migration Under Control E1 status. Using our FY2010 mid-year data. EPA believes that Human Exposure is Under Control at CURTiS BAY COAST GUARD YARD. Additionally, EPA believes that Groundwater Migration is also Under Control or CURTIS BAY COAST GUA RD YARD.

• Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use EPA's Super fond program has its own acreage measure independent 0/ any state or

agency. EPA measures acres with two distinct indicators: I) Acres Protected/or People (PFP) and 2) Acres Ready for Anticipated Use (RA U). Additionally, the Superfund program measures the number of sites which are SWRA U. All land-based Superfund acres are designated by Operable Unit (OU) or parcel.

The PFP designation is usedfor acres which are currently protective/or human health (i.e. Human Exposure is Under Control). The RA U designation is used for acres which are protective for human health, all cleanup goals in the Decision Document(s) have been achieved, and all institutional controls (ifnecessary) have been put in place. Once all OU's or parcels have been designated as RA U, and the f acility is already Construction Complete, the installation meets the criteria for becoming SWRAU (for NPL sites only).

CURTIS BAY COAST GUA RD YARD is currently not planned 10 accomplish this measure within the next several years.


the progress of cleanup activities. We are very interesled in accurately and realistically projecting the achievement ofces at all Federal fac ilities in the context 0/ ensuring the protection of human health and the environment. However, CURTIS BAY COAST GUARD YARD is currently not planned to accomplish this measure within the next several years.


remedy in order to determine if the remedy is, or will be, protective of human health and the environment. However, CURTiS BAY COAST GUARD YARD is currently not scheduled to have a 5YR within the next several years.

In FY20iO, EPA's Inspector General (IG) performed an audit on Federal Facility FiveYear Review reports, their associated data, their Issues and Recommendations, timeliness of the reports, etc. The IG recommends that EPA improve its role in, and management of, Federal facility 5YRs. We have transmilled this report to you under separate cover.

The agency considers all of these measures of critical importance because they enable us to report to the public and Congress where actions have been taken to protect human health and the environment at Superfund NPL facilities. Achievement of these measures is based on a continually successful partnership between EPA and the USGc. Many communities have expressed an interest in more transparency, and involvement in the cleanup of contaminated faci lities. EPA is committed to implementing a management strategy to identi fy opportunities for more community involvement.

In addition, EPA is initiating an aggressive multi-year effort, called the Integrated Cleanup Initiative (lCI), to integrate and leverage its land cleanup authorities (i.e., Superfund Remedial, Removal, Federal Facilities, and Brownfields) to address a greater number of contaminated sites, accelerate cleanups, and put sites back into productive use while protecting human health and the environment. As a first step, EPA has committed to a new publicly reported performance measure in FY20 II - an increase in completion of Superfund remedial action projects. This new measure better demonstrates ongoing progress and risk reduction at Superfund sites and provides the opportuni ty to better manage our cleanup program. We wi ll be talking with the USGC more about this new measure as we move forward toward the 2011 reporting date.

Thank you in advance for your efforts to work with EPA in ensuring that we continue to protect human health and the environment at Superfund NPL facilities. I ask that your organization work with our regional offices, and the Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office (FFRRO), to continue efforts to achieve protective cleanups and utilize these measures to communicate our joint successes in doing so. FFRRO's Office Director is John Reeder and he can be reached at (703) 603~9089 or at [email protected]. You can also contact Gail A. Cooper, FFRRO's Deputy Director and management lead for measures at (703) 603-0049 or at [email protected].

S· ere ,




JUL 1 2 20ic

Mr. Jan Reitman Staff Director Environment, Safety and Occupational Health-DES-E Andrew T. McNamara Building 8725 John J. Kingman Road Defense Logistics Agency Ft. Belvoir, Virginia 22060-6621

Dear Mr. Reitman:

The purpose of thi s annual letter is to ensure close coordination between the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in meeting key Government Performance and Results Act (OPRA) measures. As you know, EPA arUlually tracks accomplishments at Superfund NPL sites, of which DLA NPL facilities are a part. These measures include: Human Exposure Environmental Indicator (EI); Migration of Contaminated Groundwater (EI); Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use (SWRAU); Construction Completions (CC); and Five-Year Reviews (5YR). Although 5YRs are not GPRA measures, they are a very important activity and EPA reports annually to Congress our progress towards meeting these targets. Please see attached charts for site-specific data on these measures.

We apprec iate DLA's continued efforts to work with EPA to ensure that we are accurately capturing our progress toward protection of human health and the environment. In particular, I'd like to emphasize the importance of your Services' continued participation in the EPA/DoD Goal Hannonization Workgroup. Through this workgroup we hope to 1) better align our reporting metrics/measures. 2) develop a joint target setting process, 3) and improve our external metric communication and reporting. Eventually, we envision a closely aligned process for establishing goals and measuring progress of NPL cleanups.

• Environmental Indicators By the end of FY2010, EPA has a nationally established overall goal of 148 Federal NPL

facilities (out of 173) achieving the Human Exposure Under Control El status and 109 federal NPLfacililies achieving the Groundwater Migration Under Control EI status. Using our FY2010 mid-year data, EPA believes that Human Exposure is Under Control at all 5 of your NPLfacililies. For your convenience, the complele lisl is attached to this letter. Additionally, EPA believes thaI all 5 DLA NPL installations have a status a/Groundwater Migration Under Control

• Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use EPA's Super fond program has its own acreage measure independent of any state or

agency. EPA measures acres with two distinct indicators: J) Acres Protectedfor People (PFP) and 2) Acres Ready for Anticipated Use (RAU). Additionally, the Super fond program measures the number of sites which are Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use (SWRA U). Alliand-based Superfund acres are designated by Operable Unit (OU) or parcel.

The PFP designation is usedfor acres which are currently protective/or human health (i.e. Human Exposure is Under COnlrol). The RAU designation is usedfor acres which are protective for human health, all cleanup goals in the Decision Document(s) have been achieved, and all institutional controls (if necessary) have been put in place. Once all OUs or parcels have been designated as RA U, and the facility is already Construction Complete, the installation meets the criteria for becoming SWRAU (for NPL sites only).

There are zero DLA NPL/acilities targetedfor SWRAU in FY20iO. There is currently one DLA Federalfacility NPL installation which is planned to achieve this milestone in FY20i i, and one in FY20i 2 (please see attached list). Please verify whether this planning data is accurate.


the progress of cleanup activities. For FY20JO, the one targeted/acility has already achieved this measure. EPA is currently showing that DLA will achieve one more CC in each FY20ll and FY2012.

We are very interested in accurately and realistically projecting the achievement ofCCs at all Federal facilities in the conlexl of ensuring the protection of human health and the environment. Please respond confirming whelher or not DLA agrees wilh the provided CC planning dala, and Ihe likelihood thai the targeled candidales will achieve CC on, or before, schedule.


remedy in order to determine if the remedy is, or will be, protective of human health and the environment. One DLA 5YR is targetedfor completion in FY20JO.

In FY20JO, EPA's Inspector General (IG) performed an audit on Federal Facility FiveYear Review reports, their associated data, their issues and Recommendations, timeliness of the reports, etc. The IG recommends that EPA improve its role in, and management oj Federal facility 5YRs. We have transmitted this report to you under separate cover.

The agency considers all of these measures of critical importance because they enable us to report to the public and Congress where actions have been taken to protect human health and the environment at Superfund NPL facilities. Achievement of these measures is based on a continually successful partnership between EP A and DLA. Many communities have expressed an interest in more transparency, and involvement in the cleanup of contaminated facilities. EPA

is committed to implementing a management strategy to identify opportunities for more community involvement.

In addition, EPA is initiating an aggressive multi-year effort, called the Integrated Cleanup Initiative (ICI), to integrate and leverage its land cleanup authorities (Le., Superfund Remedial, Removal, Federal Facilities, and Brownfields) to address a greater number of contaminated sites, accelerate cleanups, and put sites back into productive use while protecting human health and the environment. As a first step, EPA has committed to a new publicly reported performance measure in FY20 II - an increase in completion of Superfund remedial action projects. This new measure better demonstrates ongoing progress and risk reduction at Superfund sites and provides the opportunity to better manage our cleanup program. We will be talking with DLA more about this new measure as we move forward toward the 2011 reporting date.

Thank you in advance for your efforts to work with EPA in ensuring that we continue to protect human health and the environment at Superfund NPL facilities. I ask that your organization work with our regional offices, and the Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office (FFRRO), to continue efforts to achieve protective cleanups and utilize these measures to communicate our joint successes in doing so. FFRRO's Office Director is John Reeder and he can be reached at (703) 603-9089 or at [email protected]. You can also contact Gail A. Cooper, FFRRO's Deputy Director and management lead for measures at (703) 603-0049 or at [email protected].

cc: John Reeder, FFRRO Gail A. Cooper, FFRRO James Woolford, OSRTI Superfund Regional National Program Managers, Regions I - X RCRA Regional National Program Managers, Regions I - X Federal Facility Program Managers, Regions 1- X



FIVE YEAR REVIEWS (as of April I, 2010)

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA) FYR

FY REG STATE Fj\C1L1TY NAME NPL ACTUAL

COM P DUE

DATE

2010 09 CA TRACY DEFENSE DEPOT (USARMY) FINAL 9/30/20 10

2010 Count I

20 12 08 UT OGDEN DEFENSE DEPOT (DLA) FINAL 7/12/2012

2012 Count I Grand Count 2

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETIONS (as of April I , 2010) FY2010

Planned NPL Site Construction Completion EPA Militan: State Facilitv Name

RCl!ion Service 04 DLA TN MEMPHIS DEFENSE DEPOT <DLA)


EPA Militan:: State Facilitv Name Re.ion Service

09 DLA CA TRACY DEFENSE DEPOT (USARMY) FY 2012

Planned NPL Site Construction Completions EPA Militan: State Facilitv Name Ree:ion Service

03 DLA VA DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLY CENTER (DLA) .

SITEWIDE READY FOR ANTICIPATED USE <as of April I, 2010)

FY2011 Planned NPL Sitewide Ready-for-Reuse

EPA Rel!ioD

Milita!:! Sen'ice State Facilitv Name

04 DLA TN MEMPHIS DEFENSE DEPOT (DLA) FY2012

Planned NPL Sitewide Readv-for-Reuse EPA

Rel!ion Milita!:! Service

State Facilitv Name

09 DLA CA TRACY DEFENSE DEPOT (ARMYMY)

ENVIRONMENTAL INDICAT ORS (as of April I , 2010)

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA)

EPA RE GION STATE FACILITY NAME

NPL STATUS

HUMAN EXPOSURE


03 VA DEFENSE GEN ERAL SUPPLY CENTER (DLA) FINAL HE UNDER CONTROL

GMUNDER CONTROL

04 TN MEMPHIS DEFENSE DEPOT (DLA) FINAL HE UNDER CONTROL

GM UNDER CONTROL

08 UT OGDEN DEFENSE DEPOT (DLA) FINAL HE CONTROLLED, PROT. REM .

GM UNDER CONTROL

09 CA SHARPE ARMY DEPOT FINAL HE CONTROLLED, PROT. REM.

GM UNDER CONTROL

09 CA TRACY DEFENSE DEPOT (USARMY) FINAL HE UNDER CONTROL

GM UNDER CONTROL

JUL 1 2 2010

The Honorable Donald Schregardus Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Environment U.S. Department of the Navy 1000 Navy Pentagon, Rm BF986 Washington, D.C. 20350-1000

Dear Mr. Schregardus:

The purpose of this annual letter is to ensure close coordination between the U.S. Department of the Navy (Navy) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in meeting key Government Perfonnance and Results Act (GPRA) measures. As you know, EPA annually tracks accomplishments at Superfund NFL sites, of which Navy NPL facilities are a part. These measures include: Human Exposure Environmental Indicator (El)~ Migration of Contaminated Groundwater (El); Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use (SWRAU); Construction Completions (CC); and Five-Year Reviews (5YR). Although 5YRs are not GPRA measures, they are a very important activity and EPA reports annually to Congress our progress towards meeting these targets. Please see attached charts for site-specific data on these measures.

We appreciate the Navy's continued efforts to work with EPA to ensure that we are accurately capturing our progress toward protection of human health and the environment. In particular, I'd like to emphasize the importance of your Services ' continued participation in the EPA/DoD Goal Harmonization Workgroup. Through this workgroup we hope to I) better align our reporting metrics/measures, 2) develop a joint target setting process, 3) and improve our external metric communication and reporting. Eventually, we envision a closely aligned process for establishing goals and measuring progress ofNPL cleanups.

• Environmental Indicators By the end oj FY2010, EPA has a nationally established overall goal oj 148 Federal NPL

facilities (out of 173) achieving the Human Exposure Under Control EI status and 109 federal NPLfacilities achieving the Groundwater Migration Under Control £1 status. Using our FY2010 mid-year data, EPA believes that Human Exposure is Not Under Control or has Insufficient Data at 8 of your 54 NPLfacilities (/5%). For your convenience, the complete list is attached to this letter. Please provide us with a brief estimate of when (fiscal year) tlte Navy expects these 8 inst'!/lations to qualify as Human Exposure Under Control.

Additionally, EPA believes that there are 18 Navy NPL installations (out of 52 facilities with Groundwater) at which Groundwater Migration is Not Under Control or has Insufficient

Data (35%). Please provide us with your estimate a/when the Navy expects these 18 installations to achieve a status a/Groundwater Migration Under Control.


agency. EPA measures acres with two distinct indicators: I) Acres Protected/or People (PFP) and 2) Acres Ready for Anticipated Use (RA U). Additionally, the Superfund program measures the number of sites which are SUewide Ready for Anticipated Use (SWRA U). Allland-based Superfund acres are designated by Operable UnU (OU) or parcel.

The PFP designation is usedfor acres which are currently protective/or human health (i.e. Human Exposure is Under Control). The RAU designation is used/or acres which are protective for human health, all cleanup goals in the Decision Document(s) have been achieved, and all institutional controls (if necessary) have been put in place. Once all OUs or parcels have been designated as RA U, and the facility is already Construction Complete, the installation meets the criteria/or becoming SWRAU (for NPL sites only).

There are two Navy NPL/acilities targetedfor SWRAU in FY2010. Please confirm that these two facilities will be able to reach this milestone this fiscal year. There is currently one Navy Federalfacility NPL installation which is planned to achieve this milestone in FY201 I, and one in FY2012 (please see attached list). Please verify whether this planning data is accurate.

• Construction Completion As you are aware, EPA 's CC measure ;s one of the primary tools used by EPA to report

the progress 0/ cleanup activities. For FY2010, there is one facility targeted to achieve this measure. EPA is currently showing that the Navy will achieve zero CCs in FY2011, but there are 4 facilities planned to achieve this measure in FY2012.

We are very interested in accurately and realistically projecting the achievement ofCes at all Federal/acilities in the context of ensuring Ihe protection of human health and the environment. Please respond confirming whether or not the Navy agrees with the provided CC planning data, and the likelihood that the/our FY2012 candidates will achieve CC on, or be/ore, schedule.


remedy in order to determine iflhe remedy is, or will be, protective of human health and the environment. Nine Navy 5YRs are targetedfor completion in FY2010. Any 5YR listing highlighted in red in the chart below means that, as of mid-year FY2010, the report had not been finalized and was overdue. Please provide us with an explanation 0/ why the Navy believes these statutorily required Five-Year Reviews have not been completed.

In FY20JO, EPA 's Inspector General (IG) performed an audit on Federal Facility Five-Year Review reports, their associated data, their Issues and Recommendations, timeliness of the reports, ele. The IG recommends that EPA improve its role in, and management ot Federal facility 5YRs. We have transmitted this report to you under separate cover.

The agency considers all o f these measures of critical importance because they enable us to report to the public and Congress where actions have been taken to protect human health and the environment at Superfund NPL facilities. Achievement of these measures is based on a continually successful partnership between EPA and the Navy. Many communities have expressed an interest in more transparency, and involvement in the cleanup of contaminated facilities. EPA is committed to implementing a management strategy to identify opportunities for more community involvement.

In addition, EPA is initiating an aggressive multi-year effort , called the Integrated Cleanup Initiative (ICI), to integrate and leverage its land cleanup authorities (i.e., Superfund Remedial, Removal, Federal Facilities, and Brownfields) to address a greater number of contaminated sites, accelerate cleanups, and put sites back into productive use while protecting human health and the environment. As a first s tep, EPA has committed to a new publicly reported perfonnance measure in FY20 II - an increase in completion of Superfund remedial action projects. This new measure better demonstrates ongoing progress and risk reduction at Superfund sites and provides the opportunity to better manage our cleanup program. We will be talking with the Navy more about this new measure as we move forward toward the 201 1 reporting date.

Thank you in advance for your efforts to work with EPA in ensuring that we continue to protect hwnan health and the environment at Superfund NPL facilities. I ask that your organization work with our regional offices, and the Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office (FFRRO), to continue efforts to achieve protective cleanups and utilize these measures to communicate our joint successes in doing so. FFRRO' s Office Director is 101m Reeder and he can be reached at (703) 603-9089 or at [email protected]. You can also contact Gail A. Cooper, FFRRO' s Deputy Director and management lead for measures at (703) 603-0049 or at cooper.gai/[email protected].

thy St , Assistant Administrator




FIVE YEAR i (as of April \, HO)

NAVY(l

FY REG , STATE 'NAME NPL ACTUAL FYR DUE

DATE

2010 01 _ME RR ' 'NAVA ' . AIR STATION <' NA I. ' 0

20 10 01 Rl NEWPORT NAVAL EDueA nON & TRAINING CENTER FINAL 1212212009 1212212009

20 10 03 VA ST, " " WN< ANNEX (u.s, NAVY) FINAL <mnolO

201 0 04 FL USN AIR ,r.rn FIELD .... >dO

20 10 04 NC CAMP ' . ,"' ''''. w , " ARY RES, '''<'''AVV' . ,'" AI

2010 04 SC PAOO ' C ,<I ",n .,'" AI

2010 09 AZ YUMA MARINE rAPp~ AIR CTAT,n" e ,,,, AI

20 10 09 CA - NAVAL AIR STATION c .

20 10 10 WA PORT I :HMENT (USNAVY) D 10

2010 Counl

2011

201 1

201 1

02

03

04

NJ

VA

FL

. ,,,,r. NAVAL AIR "' AVAI Cu.pVAon

, AIR . '" '" <' NA'

"''''AI

"''''AI

9

9/121201 1

8/ 161201 1

31112011

2011 04 FL ; FIELD NAVAL AIR STATION FINAL III

2011 04 GA MARl> ;L ; BASE FINAL ,,,,no l i

20 11 09 CA ALAMEDA NAVAL AIR STATION J INAL 8/2120 11

20 11 10 WA BANGOR NAVAL SUBMARINE BASE FINAL I: 10

2011 10 WA "" n", A ",r. DISPOSAL" '" A VV' FINAL I: llO

20 11

201 1

10

10

WA

WA

'"

NAVAL

I PARK un"<I"'~EX'"

>c '" wn~n~ 'U STATION (4 FINAL

FINAL

51111201 1

2011 Coun' 10

20 12 01 CT NEW LONDON SUBMARlNE BASE JINAL 12/2 1/20 11

2012 0 1 MA SOUTH WEYMOUTH NAVAL AIR STATION FINAL I II

20 12 0 1 ME I lnl NAVAL SHI PYARD FINA L

2012 03 MD ' '''nlA''l HEAD~ AV Ir. "'AO<AOC , FINAL

20 12 03 PA NAVAL AIR DEVELOPMENT CENTER (8 WASTE AREAS) FINAL 8/ 14120 12

2012 09 CA MOFFETT NAVAL AIR STATION FINA L 912812012

2012 10 AK ADAK NAVA L AIR STATION FINAL 71231201 2



Planned NPL Site Construction Completion EPA

Rel!ion Militan:: Service

State Facilitv Name

NORFOLK NAVAL BASE (SEWELLS POINT 03 NAVY VA NA VAL COMPLEX)

FY2012 Planned NPL Site Construction Completions

EPA Rel!ion

Militan:: Service

State Facilitv Name

03 NAVY VA NORFOLK NAVAL SHIPYARD 04 NAVY FL PENSACOLA NAVAL AIR STATION 04 NAVY FL WHITING FIELD NAVAL AIR STATION 04 NAVY GA MARINE CORPS LOGISTICS BASE

SITE WIDE READ Y FOR ANTICIPATED USE (as of April I, 2010) FY2010

Planned NPL Sitcwide Readv-for-Anticipated Usc EPA --


State Facilitv Name

NAVAL AIR DEVELOPMENT CENTER (8 03 NAVY PA WASTE AREAS) 04 NAVY FL USN AIR STATION CECIL FIELD

FY2011 Planned NPL Sitewide Ready-for- Anticipated U.e

EPA Rce.ion

Militan Service State Facility Name

NORFOLK NAVAL BASE (SEWELLS POINT 03 NAVY VA NAVAL COMPLEX)

FY2012 Planned NPL Sitewide Ready-for- Anticipated U.e

EPA Ree.ion

Militao: Service

State Facilitv Name

NAVAL AIR STATION, WHIDBEY ISLAND

10 NAVY WA (AULT FIELD)

ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS (as of April 1, 2010) NAVY


NPL STATUS

HUMAN EXPOSURE


01 CT NEW LONDON SUBMARINE BASE FINAL HE UNDER CONTROL

GMNOT DETERMINED

0 1 MA NAVAL WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL RESERVE PLANT

FINAL HE UNDER CONTROL

GM UNDER CONTROL

01 MA SOUTH WEYMOUTH NA V AL AlR STATION FINAL HE UNDER CONTROL

GMNOT DETERMINED

01 ME BRUNSWICK NAVAL AIR STATION FINAL HE CONTROLLED, PROT. REM.

GMUNDER CONTROL

EPA NPL HUMAN GROUNDWATER STATE FACILITY NAME STATUS

01 ME PORTSMOUTH NA V AL PYARD FINAL HE LIN DER GM UN DER CONTROL CONTROL

01 RI DAVISVILLE NAVAL CONSTRUCTION FINAL HE UNDER BAIT ALiON CENTER CONTROL

01 RI NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION & TRAINING FINAL HE LINDER CENTER CONTROL

AIR

02 PR NAVAL SECURITY GROUP ACTIVITY

NAVY YARD

CENTER

I RESERVE STATION DETERMINED

NAVY EPA

REGION STATE FACILITY NAME NPL



03 VA MARlNE CORPS COMBAT DEVELOPMENT COMMAND


GMUNDER CONTROL

03 VA NAVAL AMPHIBIOUS BASE LITTLE CREEK FINAL HE UNDER CONTROL

GM UNDER CONTROL

03 VA NAVAL SURF ACE WARFARE CENTER-DAHLGREN


GM UNDER CONTROL

03 VA NAVAL WEAPONS STATION - YORKTOWN FINAL HEN_OT DETERMINED

GMNO' DETERMINED

03 VA NORFOLK NA V AL BASE (SEW ELLS POINT NA V AL COMPLEX)


GM UNDER CONTROL

03 VA NORFOLK NAVAL SHTPY ARD FINAL HE UNDER CONTROL

GMNOT DETERMINED

03 VA NWS YORKTOWN - CHEATHAM ANNEX FINAL HE NOT DETERMINED

GMNOT DETERMINED

03 VA ST. JULlENS CREEK ANNEX (U.S. NAVY) FINAL HE UNDER CONTROL

GM UNDER CONTROL

03 WV ALLEGANY BALLISTICS LABORATORY (USNAVY)


GM UNDER CONTROL

04 FL JACKSONV ILLE NA V A LAIR STATION FINAL HE UNDER CONTROL

GM UNDER CONTROL

04 FL PENSACOLA NAVAL AIR STATION FINAL HE UNDER CONTROL

GMUNDER CONTROL

04 FL USN AIR STATION CECIL FIELD FINAL LONG TERM PROTECT

GMUNDER CONTROL

04 FL WHITING FIELD NAVAL AIR STATION FINAL HE UNDER CONTROL

GMUNDER CONTROL

NAVY



LEJEUN E MILITARY FINAL HE CONTROL

DEPOT

POINT ANNEX CONTROL

EPA NPL HUMAN GROUNDWATER MIGRATION

TELECOMMUNICATIONS AREA MASTER STATION EASTERN PACIFIC

PROT. REM. CONTROL

JUL 1 2 2OiO

The Honorable Ioes R. Triay Assistant Secretary for

Environmental Management U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washinglon, D.C. 20585-0113

Dear Ms. Triay:

The purpose of this annual letter is to ensure close coordination between the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in meeting key Government Performance and Results Act (OPRA) measures. As you know, EPA annually tracks accomplishments at Superfund N PL sites, of which DOE NPL sites are a part. These measures include: Human Exposure Environmental Indicator (El); Migration of Contaminated Groundwater (EI); Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use (SWRAU); Construction Completions (CC); and Five-Year Reviews (5YR). Although 5YRs are not GPRA measures, they are a very important activity and EPA reports annually to Congress our progress towards meeting these targets. Please see attached charts for site-specific data on these measures.

We appreciate DOE's continued efforts to work with EPA to ensure that we are accurately capturing our progress toward protection of human health and the environment. Below is a status update of the aforementioned measures:

• Environmental Indicators By the end oJFY2010, EPA has a nationally established overall goal oj 148 Federal NPL

sites (out of 173) achieving the Human Exposure Under Control EI status and 109 federal NPL sites achieving the Groundwater Migration Under Control EI status. Using our FY2010 midyear data, EPA believes that all DOE sites are Human Exposure Under Control. For your convenience, the complete list is allached ( a this leller.

However, EPA believes that there are 8 DOE NPL siles (out of21 sites with Groundwater) al which Groundwater Migration is Not Under Control or has Insufficient Data (38%). Please provide us wit" your estimate o/whell DOE expects these 8 sites to achieve a status o/Groundwater Migration Under Control.

• Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use EPA's Superfund program has its own acreage measure independent of any stale or

agency. EPA measures acres with two distinct indicators: 1) Acres Protectedfor People (PFP)

and 2) Acres Ready/or Anticipated Use (RA U). Additionally, the Superfund program measures the number 0/ sires which are Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use (SWRA U). AlIland-based Superfund acres are designated by Operable Unit (aU) or parcel.

The PFP designation is usedfor acres which are currently protective for human health (i.e. Human Exposure is Under Control). The RAU designation is used/or acres which are protective for human health, all cleanup goals in the Decision Document(s} have been achieved, and all institutional controls (if necessary) have been pUI in place. Once all au's or parcels have been deSignated as RA U, and the/acility is already Construction Complete, the installation meets the criteria/or becoming SWRAU (for NPL sites only).

There is one DOE NPL site targeted/or SWRAU in FY20JO. Please confirm that this site will be able to reach this milestone this fiscal year. There also is currently one DOE Federal facility NPL site which is planned to achieve this milestone in FY20JJ, and two in FY20J2 (please see attached list). Please verify whether this planning data is accurate.


the progress a/cleanup activities. We are very interested in accurately and realistically projecting the achievement o/CCs at all Federal sites in the context a/ensuring the protection of human health and the environment. However, zero DOE NPL sites are currently planned to accomplish this measure within the next several years.

• Five-Year Reviews Five-Year Reviews are conducted to evaluate the implementation and performance a/a

remedy in order to determine iJthe remedy is, or will be, protective a/human health and the environment. Zero DOE 5YRs are targetedfor completion in FY20JO, and zero DOE 5YRs are currently overdue.

In FY2010, EPA's Inspector General (IG) performed an audit on Federal Facility FiveYear Review reports, their associated data, their Issues and Recommendations, timeliness of the reports, elc. The IG recommends that EPA improve its role in, and management of, Federal facility 5YRs. We have transmilled this report to you under separate cover.

The agency considers a ll of these measures of critical importance because they enable us to report to the public and Congress where actions have been taken to protect human health and the environment at Superfund NPL sites. Achievement of these measures is based on a continually successful partnership between EPA and DOE. Many communities have expressed an interest in more transparency, and involvement in the cleanup of contaminated sites. EPA is committed to implementing a management strategy to identify opportunities for more community involvement.

In addition, EPA is initiating an aggressive multi-year effort, called the Integrated Cleanup Initiative (ICI), to integrate and leverage its land cleanup authorities (Le., Superfund Remedial , Removal, Federal Sites, and Browntields) to address a greater number of contaminated sites, accelerate cleanups, and put sites back into productive use whi le protecting

human health and the environment. As a first step, EPA has committed to a new publicly reported perfonnance measure in FY20 11 - an increase in completion of Superfund remedial action projects. This new measure better demonstrates ongoing progress and ri sk reduction at Superfund sites and provides the opportunity to better manage our cleanup program. We will be talking with DOE more about this new measure as we move forward toward the 20 11 reporting date.

Thank you in advance for your efforts to work with EPA in ensuring that we continue to protect human health and the environment at Superfund NPL sites. I ask that your organization work with our regional offices, and the Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office (FFRRO). to continue efforts to achieve protective cleanups and utilize these measures to communicate our joint successes in doing so. FFRRO's Office Director is John Reeder and he can be reached at (703) 603-9089 or at [email protected]. You can also contact Gail A. Cooper. FFRRO's Deputy Director and management lead for measures at (703) 603-0049 or at cooper.gai/[email protected].

ministrator

cc: John Reeder, FFRRO Gail A. Cooper, FFRRO James Woolford, OSRTI Superfund Regional National Program Managers, Regions I ~ X ReRA Regional National Program Managers, Regions I - X Federal Facility Program Managers, Regions I - X



FIVE YEAR REVIEWS <as of April I, 2010)

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE)

FY REG STATE FACILITY NAME NPL ACTUAL

COMP FYR DUE

DATE

201 1 02 NY BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY (USDOE) FINAL 81912011

20 11 05 OH FEED MATE RIALS PRODUCTION CENTE R (USDOE) FINAL 9116120 11

20 11 05 OH MOUND PLANT (US DOE) FINAL 912812011

201 1 07 MO WELDON SPRING OUARRYIPLANT/PITS (USDOE/ARMY) FINAL 9129/20 11

20 11 09 CA LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATL LAB (S ITE 300) (USDOE) FINAL 10/ 112010

2011 Count 5

20 12 04 TN OAK RIDGE RESE RVATION (USDOE) FINAL 3/ 1912012

20 12 08 CO ROCKY FLATS PLANT (USDOE) FINAL 9/14120 12

2012 08 UT MONTICELLO MILL TA ILINGS (USDOE) FINAL 6111/20 12

20 12 09 CA LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATL LAB (SITE 300) (USDOE) FINAL 12/ 14/20 11

20 12 09 CA LA WRENCE LI VERMORE NATL LAB (SITE 300) (USDOE) FINAL 4/ 1912012

20 12 09 CA LA WRENCE LI VERMORE NATL LAB, MA IN SITE (USDOE) FINAL 8129120 12

20 12 10 ID IDA HO NATIONAL ENG INEERING LABORATORY (USDOE) FINAL 1214120 11

20 12 10 ID IDAHO NATIONAL ENG INEERING LABORATORY (USDOE) FINA L 12/4/20 11

20 12 10 ID IDAHO NATIONAL ENG INEERING LABORATORY (USDOE) FINAL 1212 112011

20 12 10 WA HANFORD 100-AREA (USDOE) FINAL 5/4/20 12

20 12 10 WA HANFORD I IOO-AREA (US DOE) DELETED 514120 12

20 12 10 WA HANFORD 200-AREA (USDOE) FINAL 5/4/2012

20 12 10 WA HANFO RD 300-AREA (USDOE) FINAL 5/4120 12

2012 Count 13 Gra nd Count 18

SITEWIDE REA DY FOR ANTICIPATED USE las of ADril 1,2010) FY 2010

Planned NPL Sitewide Readv-for-Reuse EPA Militan:

State Facili!l:', Name Region Service DEPT. OF

10 ENERGY WA HANFORD 1100-AREA (US DOE) FY 2011

Planned NPL Sitewide Readv-for-Reuse EPA Militan: State Facili!l: Name Region Service

DEPT. OF W.R. GRACE & CO., INC./WA YNE INTERIM 02 ENERGY NJ STORAGE SITE (US DOE)

FY 2012 Planned NPL Sitewide Readv-for-Reuse

EPA MiJitaa State Facilill Name R;;ion Service DEPT. OF

05 ENERGY OH MOUND PLANT (USDOEl DEPT. OF WELDON SPRING QUARRYIPLANTIPITS

07 ENERGY MO I IUSDOEIARMY)

ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS

HUMAN GROUNDWATER EPA NPL

FINAL HE UNDER GM UNDER

& FINAL

CONTROL

HE UNDER

CONTROL

GM UNDER STORAGE SITE CONTROL CONTROL

NA FINAL HE UNDER (USDOE) CONTROL

PADUCAH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT FINAL HE UNDER (USDOE) CONTROL

SA V ANNAH RIVER SITE (USDOE) FINAL HE UNDER CONTROL

OAK RIDGE RESERV A nON (USDOE) FINAL HE UNDER CONTROL

FINAL (USOOEIARMY)

FINAL

RESEARCH/OLD CAMPUS LANDFILL (USDOE) CONTROL CONTROL


(USOOE)

(USDOE)

LASORA TORY (US DOE)

WA COMPLEX (USDOE)

10 WA HANFORD 1 FINAL

10 WA HANFORD 11 OO-AREA

WA HANFORD

DELETED

JUL 1 2 2010

The Honorable Dorothy Robyn Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for

Installations and Environment 3400 Defense Penlagon, Rm 3B856-A Washinglon, D.C. 20301-3400

Dear Dr. Robyn:

The purpose of this annual letter is to ensure close coordination between the U.S. Department of Defense (000) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in meeting key Government Perfonnance and Results Act (GPRA) measures. As you know, EPA annually tracks accomplishments at Superfund NPL sites, of which 000 NPL facilities are a part. These measures include: Human Exposure Environmental Indicator (EI); Migration of Contaminated Groundwater (El); Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use (SWRAU); Construction Completions (CC); and Five-Year Reviews (5YR). Although 5YRs are not GPRA measures, they are a very important activity and EPA reports annually to Congress our progress towards meeting these targets. Please see attached charts for site-specific data on these measures.

We appreciate DoD's continued efforts to work with EPA to ensure that we are accurately capturing our progress toward protection of human health and the environment. In particular, I'd like to emphasize the importance of your Services' continued participation in the EPA/DoD Goal Harmonization Workgroup. Through this workgroup we hope to 1) better align our reporting metrics/measures, 2) develop a joint target setting process, 3) and improve our external metric communication and reporting. Eventually, we envision a closely aligned process for establishing goals and measuring progress of NPL cleanups.

• Environmental Indicators By the end of FY2010, EPA hos a notionolly established overall goal of 148 Federal NPL

facilities (Ollt of 173) achieving the Human Exposure Under Control EI status and J09 federal NPLfacilities achieving the Groundwater Migration Under Control E1 status. Using our FY2010 mid-year data, EPA believes that Hllman Exposure is NOl Under Control or has Insufficient Data at 22 of your 140 NPL /acilities (16%). For your convenience, the complete list is attached to this letter. Please note that Hamilton Island Landfill, a US Army Corps of Engineers facUity, is deletedJrom the NPL and excludedJrom the list below. Please provide us with a brief estimate o/whell (fiscal year) DoD expects these 22 ills/al/ations to qualify as Human Exposure Under COlltrol.

Additionally, EPA believes that there are 39 DoD NPL installations (out of J 35 facilities with Groundwater) at which Groundwater Migration is Not Under Control or has Insufficient Data (29%). Please provide us with your estimate o/when DoD expects these 39 installations to achieve a status 0/ Groundwater Migration Under Control.

• Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use EPA's Super fond program has its own acreage measure independent of any state or

agency. EPA measures acres with two distinct indicators: I) Acres Protectedfor People (PFP) and 2) Acres Ready for Anticipated Use (RA Uj. Additionally, the Superfund program measures the number of sites which are Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use (SWRA U). Allland-based Super fond acres are designated by Operable Unit (OU) or parcel.

The PFP designation is usedfor acres which are currently protective for human health (i.e. Human Exposure is Under Control). The RA U designation is used for acres which are protective for human health, all cleanup goals in the Decision Document(s) have been achieved, and all institutional controls (if necessary) have been put in place. Once all OV's or parcels have been deSignated as RA V, and the facility is already Construction Complete, the installation meets the criteria for becoming SWRAU (for NPL sites only).

There are seven DoD NPLfacilities targetedfor SWRAV in FY2010. Please confirm that these seven facilities will be able to reach this milestone this fiscal year. There are currently three DoD Federalfacility NPL installations which are planned to achieve this milestone in FY20J 1, and eight in FY20J 2 {please see attached list}. Please verify whether this planning data is accurate.


the progress of cleanup activities. For FY2010, DoD has achieved 3 of the four planned CCs. The one remaining is NORFOLK NAVAL BASE (SEWELLS POINT NAVAL COMPLEX). EPA is currently showing that DoD will achieve two CCs in FY20J J, and there are 8/acilities planned to achieve this measure in FY2012.

We are very interested in accurately and realistically projecting the achievement olCCs at all Federal facilities in the context 01 ensuring the protection of human health and the environment. Please respond confirming whether or not DoD agrees with the provided CC planning data, and the likelihood that the eight FY2012 calldidates will occur on, or be/ore, schedule.

• Five-Year Reviews Five-Year Reviews are conducted to evaluate the implementation and performance o/a

remedy in order to determine if the remedy is, or will be, protective a/human health and the environment. Twenty-nine DoD 5YRs are targeted/or completion in FY20JO. Any 5YR listing highlighted in red in the chart below means thaI, as of mid-year FY20JO, the report had not been finalized and was overdue. Please provide liS with an explanation a/why DoD believes these statutorily required Five-Year Reviews have IlOt been compleled.

In FY20/0, EPA 's Inspector General (IG) performed an audit on Federal Facility FiveYear Review reports, their associated data, their Issues and Recommendations, timeliness a/the reports, etc. The IG recommends that EPA improve its role in, and management of, Federal facility 5YRs. We have transmilled this report to you under separate cover.

The agency considers all of these measures of critical importance because they enable us to report to the public and Congress where actions have been taken to protect human health and the environment at Superfund NPL facilities. Achievement of these measures is based on a continually successful partnership between EPA and 000. Many communities have expressed an interest in more transparency. and involvement in the cleanup of contaminated facilities. EPA is committed to implementing a management strategy to identify opportunities for more community involvement.

In addition, EPA is initiating an aggressive multi-year effort. called the Integrated Cleanup Initiative (leI), to integrate and leverage its land cleanup authorities (i.e., Superfund Remedial, Removal. Federal Facilities, and Brownfields) to address a greater number of contaminated sites, accelerate cleanups, and put sites back into productive use whi le protecting human health and the environment. As a first step, EPA has committed to a new publicly reported perfonnance measure in FY2011 - an increase in completion of Superfund remedial action projects. This new measure better demonstrates ongoing progress and risk reduction at Superfund sites and provides the opportunity to better manage our cleanup program. We will be talking with DoD more about this new measure as we move forward toward the 2011 reporting date.

Thank you in advance for your efforts to work with EPA in ensuring that we continue to protect human health and the environment at Superfund NPL faci lities. I ask that your organization work with our regional offices, and the Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office (FFRRO), to continue efforts to achieve protective cleanups and utilize these measures to communicate our joint successes in doing so. FFRRO's Office Director is John Reeder and he can be reached at (703) 603-9089 or at reeder.jolm@;!pa.gov. You can also contact Gai l A. Cooper, FFRRO's Deputy Director and management lead for measures at (703) 603-0049 or at [email protected].




ARMY ACTUAL FYR DUE

FINAL

II 06

2011 07 IA IOWA ARMY AMMUN ITION PLANT 3/23120 11

RIVERBANK ARMY PLANT FINAL 912212011

FINAL

12 07 20 12 09 CA

2012 09 CA SACRAMENTO ARMY DEPOT FINAL 9124/20 12

2012 09 HI SCHOFIELD BARRACKS CUSARMY) DELETED 912412012

20 12 10 WA FORT LEWIS LOGISTICS CENTER FINAL 9128/2012


CONSTRUCTION COMPLETIONS Cas of April I, 2010) FY 2010

Planned NPL Site Construction Completion EPA Militar,r

State Facilitv Name Rel!ion Service


Planned NPL Site Construction Completions EPA MiIita!,Y

State Facilitv Name Rel!ion Service

NEW BRIGHTON/ARDEN HILLS/TCAAP 05 ARMY MN I (USARMY)


EPA Militar,r Statc Facilitv Name

RCl!ion Service 04 ARMY AL ALABAMA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT 07 ARMY KS FORT RILEY

SITEWIDE READ Y FOR ANTICIPATED USE (as of April 1 2010) FY 2010


Ree:ion Militan: Service

State Facility Name

05 ARMY IL JOLIET ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT (LOAD-ASSEMBLY-PACKING AREA)

05 ARMY IL JOLIET ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT

I (MANUFACTURING AREA) 10 ARMY WA FORT LEWIS (LANDFILL NO.5)

FY 2011 Planned NPL Sitewide Ready-for-Reuse

EPA Rel!ion

Militaa Service

State Facilitv Name


Planned NPL Sit.wide Readv-for-Reuse EPA


State Facility Name

04 ARMY AL ALABAMA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT

05 ARMY MN NEW BRIGHTON/ARDEN HILLSITCAAP (ARMYMY)

07 ARMY MO WELDON SPRING FORMER ARMY ORDNANCE WORKS

NPL HUMAN GROUNDWATER

~~~~~~!f~~~~N~A~M~E~----------------~~~~-H~~~~----- MIGRATION

CONTROL 0 1 MA MATEruALSTECHNOLOGYLABORATORY DELETED TERM NOTAGM

PROTECT 0 1 MA NATICK LABORATORY ARMY RESEARCH, FINAL HE UNDER GMNOT

DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING CENTER CONTROL DETERMINED 02 NJ FORT D1X (LANDHLL SITE) FINAL LONG TERM GMUNDER

PROTECT CONTROL 02 NJ PICA TINNY ARSENAL (USARMY) FINAL HE UNDER GM UNDER

CONTROL CONTROL

WATER

03 MD FORT GEORGE G. MEADE FINAL

03 PA LETIERKENNY ARMY DEPOT (PDO AREA) FINA L

03 PA LETIERKENNY ARMY DEPOT (SE AREA) FINAL HE UNDER CONTROL

ARMY EPA NPL HUMAN GROUNDWATER

MIGRATION FINAL HE

PROT. REM . r-~,--t-.,,-trAnT~~on~~,,",--------------rF"'~~A·L---+~

INDUSTRIAL AREA)

TN MILAN ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT FINAL GMNOT DETERM~ED

GM UNDER CONTROL

""""--t-r

(USARMY) CONTROL

06 LA LOU PROTECT

06 TX LONE STAR ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT F~AL TERM

ARMY EPA NPL HUMAN GROUNDWATER

EXPOSURE MIGRATION

09 CA SACRAMENTO ARMY DEPOT FINAL GM CONTROL CONTROL

ARMY EPA

REGION STATE FACILITY NAME NPL



09 HI SCHOFIELD BARRACKS (USARMY) DELETED LONG TERM PROTECT

GM UNDER CONTROL

10 AK FORT RICHARDSON (USARMY) FINAL HE CONTROLLED, PROT. REM.

GM UNDER CONTROL

10 AK FORT WAINWRIGHT FINAL HE UNDER CONTROL

GMNOT DETERMINED

10 OR UMATILLA ARMY DEPOT (LAGOONS) FINAL HE UNDER CONTROL

GM UNDER CONTROL

10 WA FORT LEWIS (LANDFILL NO.5) DELETED LONG TERM PROTECT

NOTAGMSITE

10 WA FORT LEWIS LOG ISTICS CENTER FINAL HE UNDER CONTROL

GM UNDER CONTROL

10 WA HAMILTON ISLAND LANDFILL (USA/COE) DELETED LONG TERM PROTECT

NOT AGM SITE

FIVE YEAR : <as of April!, 10)

NAVY I V I ACTUAL

.'.r " .TV ~ .u. FY~~~~ FY . . REG NPL

20 10 0 1 ME I RRI I .AIR FINAL 10 '" I, non, 2010 0 1 R1 . EDU I & TRA INING FINAL

20 10 03 VA I ST. JULlFNS :CU.S. NAVY) FINAL 10

2010 04 FL USN AIR I CECIL FIELD F INA L !.2.. 20 10 04 NC CAMP LEJ EUNE MILITARY RES. (USNAVY) FINAL

2010 04 SC PARRIS ISLAND MARINE CORPS RECRUIT DEPOT FINAL

2010 ;;09 AZ YUMA MARINE CORPS AIR STATION FINAL

20 10 09 CA MOFFETT NAVAL AIR ST An ON FINAL ononOIO

20 10 I nc, CTC" 10 WA PORT W A n" .. r. 'C"T (L ) 10

2010 Counl 9

20 11 02 NJ .AIR ) 11

20 11 03 VA I.K NA'/A I. SH IPYARD FINAl. II

20 11 04 FL IJ .R NAVAL AIR STATION FINAL 3/ 1120 11

20 11 04 FL WHITING FIELD NAVAL AIR STATION FINAL 6114120 11

2011 04 GA MARINE CORPS LOG ISTICS BASE FINAL '" "'" II 20 11 09 CA ALAMEDA NAVA L AIR FINAL II

2011 10 WA I RANr.n~ NAVAL s, ,n"'Ao""E BASE F[NAL t:

20[ [ [0 WA I RA"r.,... no"" Nrc " 's,,' VY) F[NAL

20 [ [ [0 WA [ PARK HOIJSlNG LEX (" F[NAL 5/11120 11 NAVAL UNDERSEA WARFARE ENGINEERING STATION (4

20 11 10 WA . ARC,AS) F[NAL I

2011 Counl 10

20 12 O[ CT NEW LONDON SUBMARINE BASE FINA L 1212 1120 11

2012 01 MA SOUTH WEYMOUTH NAVAL AIR STATION FINAL 12/22120 11

20 12 01 ME PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SH IPYARD FINAL

20 12 03 MD INDIAN HEAD NAVA L ~rr: WARFARE FINAL

20 12 03 PA NAVAL AIR DEVELOPMENT CENTER (8 WASTE AREAS) FINAL 811 412012

2012 09 CA MOFFETT NAVAL A I R STATION FINAL 9128120 12

2012 10 AK ADAK NAVAL AIR STATION FINAL 712312012



Planned NPL Site Construction Completion EPA Militaa

State Facilitv Name Re~ion Service



EPA Militaa State Facilitv Name Ree:ion Service

03 NAVY VA NORFOLK NAVAL SHIPYARD 04 NAVY FL PENSACOLA NAVAL AIR STATION 04 NAVY FL WHITING FIELD NAVAL AIR STATION 04 NAVY GA MARINE CORPS LOGISTICS BASE

SITEWIDE READ Y FOR ANTICIPATED USE (as of April I, 2010) FY 2010

Planned NPL Sitewide Ready·for·Anticipated Use EPA

Re2ion Military Service

State Facilitv Name

NAVAL AIR DEVELOPMENT CENTER (8 03 NAVY PA WASTE AREAS) 04 NAVY FL USN AIR STA n ON CECIL FIELD

FY2011 Planned NPL Sitewide Ready-for- Anticipated Usc

EPA Rellion

Militan: Service

State Facilitt, Name


FY20I2 Planned NPL Sitewide Ready-for- Anticipated Use

EPA Rce.ion

Militan: Service

State Facilitv Name

NAVAL AIR STA nON, WHIDBEY ISLAND 10 NAVY WA (AULT FIELD)


NAVY


NPL STATUS

HUMAN EXPOSURE


01 CT NEW LONDON SUBMARINE BASE FINAL HE UNDER CONTROL

OM NOT DETERMINED

01 MA NA VAL WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL RESERVE PLANT


OM UNDER CONTROL

01 MA SOUTH WEYMOUTH NAVAL AIR STATION FINAL HE UNDER CONTROL

OM NOT DETERMINED

01 ME BRUNSWICK NAVAL AIR STATION FINAL HE CONTROLLED, PROT. REM.

GMUNDER CONTROL

NAVY EPA NPL HUMAN GROUNDWATER

STATE FACILITY NAME STATUS EXPOSURE MIGRATION NAVAL SHIPYARD

BAIT ALiON CENTER

CENTER

FINAL

03 PA WILLOW GROVE NAVAL AIR AND AIR FINAL RESERVE STATION DETERMINED


DAHLGREN

NAVAL COMPLEX)

CONTROL CONTROL

NAVY

NPL HUMAN GROUNDWATER FACILITY NAME EXPOSURE MARINE

DEPOT

PLANT

FINAL

MOFFETT FINAL

09 CA TREASURE ISLAND NAVAL STATION-HUNTERS FINAL

DETERMINED

HE UNDER GM UNDER POINT ANNEX CONTROL CONTROL

NAVY EPA NPL GROUNDWATER

REGION HI

PARK

NAVAL AIR STA FIELD)

STATION (4 WASTE AREAS)

PROT. REM . CONTROL


NPL Site Construction Completions Achieved Militan::

EPA Rez;ioD State Facilitv Name Service

NATIONAL OTIS AIR NATIONAL GUARD 01 GUARD MA BASE/CAMP EDWARDS

SITE WIDE READ Y FOR ANTICIPATED USE (as of April I , 2010) FY 2010


Ree:ion Military Service

State Facili!l: Name

NATIONAL OTIS AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE/CAMP 01 GUARD MA EDWARDS

ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS (as of April I , 2010)

NATJONALGUARD


01 MA OTIS AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE/CAMP FINAL HE UNDER GM UNDER EDWARDS CONTROL CONTROL

ACfUAL FYR DUE

LORING AIR BASE

AIR FORCE BASE

) 1122/2010

MOUNTAIN HOME AIR FORCE BASE FINAL

19


Planned NPL Site Construction Completions EPA

Ree:ion Militan:: Service

State Facility Name

AIR 02 FORCE NY PLATTSBURGH AIR FORCE BASE

SITEWIDE READ Y FOR ANTICIPATED USE (as of April I, 2010) FY 2010


Rce.ion Militaa Service

State Facilitv Name

AIR MATHER AIR FORCE BASE (AC&W 09 FORCE CA DISPOSAL SITE)

FY 2012 Planned NPL Sitewide Ready-for-Reuse

EPA Rce.ion

Militaa Service

State Jo'acilitv Name

AIR 04 FORCE FL HOMESTEAD AIR FORCE BASE

AIR 05 FORCE OH WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE

AIR 10 FORCE WA AMERICAN LAKE GARDENS/MCCHORD AFB

04 FL TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE

FINAL

FINAL

FINAL

FINAL

#4/SLUDGE LAGOON) f-------;;~----1f---=.------' TWIN CITIES AIR FORCE RESERVE BASE "-_ __ L--__ (SMALL ARMS RANGE LANDFILL) PROT. REM. CONTROL

EPA NPL HUMAN GROUNDWATER REGION STATE

os OH WRlGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE FINAL HE UNDER GMUNDER CONTROL CONTROL

TINKER AIR BASE (SOLDfER CREEK/BUILDING 3001)

FINAL

09 PROTECT

AZ WILLIAMS AIR FORCE BASE FINAL HE UNDER

09

CONTROL

CA CASTLE AIR FORCE BASE (6 AREAS) FINAL

CONTROL CONTROL

CA MARCH AIR FORCE BASE FINAL HE UNDER GM UNDER CONTROL CONTROL


SITE)

RACKfrREATMENT AREA) PROT. REM. CONTROL

FIVE YEAR REVIEWS <as of April I, 2010)

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA) FYR

ACTUAL.. DUE FY REG STATE FACILITY NAME NPL COMP DATE

2010 09 CA TRACY DEFENSE DEPOT (USARMY) FINAL 9/3012010

2010 Count I

2012 08 UT OGDEN DEFENSE DEPOT (DLA) FINAL 7/12/2012

2012 Count I Grand Count 2


Planned NPL Site Construction Completion EPA

R~2ion Militaa Service

State Facilitv Name

04 DLA 1N MEMPHIS DEFENSE DEPOT (DLA) FY2011

Planned NPL Site Construction Comoletions EPA

Re~ion

Military Service

State Facilitv Name

09 DLA CA TRACY DEFENSE DEPOT (USARMY) FY2012

Planned NPL Site Construction Completions EPA

RCl!ion Militaa Service

State Facilin: Name

03 DLA VA DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLY CENTER (DLA)

SITE WIDE READ Y FOR ANTICIPATED USE (as of April I, 2010) FY2011


Ree:ion Milita!:! Service

State Facilitv Name

04 DLA TN MEMPHIS DEFENSE DEPOT (DLA) FY2012


Reeion Militan:: Service

State Facili!J:: Name

09 DLA CA TRACY DEFENSE DEPOT (ARMYMY)


DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA)


03 VA DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLY CENTER (DLA) FINAL HE UNDER GM UNDER CONTROL CONTROL

04 TN MEMPHIS DEFENSE DEPOT (DLA) FINAL HE UNDER GM UNDER CONTROL CONTROL

08 UT OGDEN DEFENSE DEPOT (DLA) FINAL HE CONTROLLED, GM UNDER PROT. REM. CONTROL

09 CA SHARPE ARMY DEPOT FINAL HE CONTROLLED, GM UNDER PROT. REM. CONTROL

09 CA TRACY DEFENSE DEPOT (USARMY) FINAL HE UNDER GM UNDER CONTROL CONTROL

2010 epa letters regarding remediation metrics …...additionally, epa believes that there are i6...

Documents