2010-2011 ard committee decision-making process for the texas assessment program (ard manual)

2010-20112010-2011ARD Committee Decision-ARD Committee Decision-

Making Process for the Making Process for the Texas Assessment Program Texas Assessment Program

(ARD Manual)(ARD Manual)Training presented at Special Education

Assessments TETN #7930September 15, 2010

Manual available online only on the ARD Committee Resources page at

http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/resources/ard

(Copy as needed for educational/training purposes)

DisclaimerDisclaimer These slides have been prepared and

approved by the Student Assessment Division of the Texas Education Agency.

If any slide is amended or revised for use in local or regional trainings, please remove the TEA footer at the bottom of the slide.

29/15/2010 TETN #7930 TEA Student Assessment Division

AgendaAgenda Purpose, Training, and What’s New? Federal and State Requirements Components of the 2010 Texas Assessment

Program The Four Steps in Making Assessment Decisions ELLs Receiving Special Education Services SSI Requirements for Students Receiving

Special Education Services Graduation Flowcharts for Students Receiving

Special Education Services Miscellaneous

39/15/2010 TETN #7930

TEA Student Assessment Division

Purpose, Purpose, Training, and Training, and What’s New?What’s New?

5

Purpose of the ARD Purpose of the ARD ManualManual

Provide guidance to ARD committees about how to make state assessment decisions based on how a student accesses the state-mandated curriculum (TEKS), as documented in the student’s IEP.


Who Needs to be Who Needs to be Trained?Trained?

6

Anyone who attends ARD committee meetings should be aware of and have access to the ARD manual and these training slides.


This training should not replace reading the manual.

An icon has been used throughout the manual to direct the reader to additional

materials that may assist educators when making assessment decisions.

The four steps to making appropriate assessment decisions have been expanded and clarified. More emphasis has been placed on using the instruction documented in the IEP as the basis for making appropriate assessment decisions.

7

What’s New in the 2010-What’s New in the 2010-2011 ARD Manual?2011 ARD Manual?


Information has been added in Step 2 of Making Assessment Decisions about the differences between accommodations and modifications.

An explanation of a significant cognitive disability has been added in Step 3 of Making Assessment Decisions.

A new section titled “Changing the Assessment Decision During the School Year” has been included in Step 3 of Making Assessment Decisions.

89/15/2010 TETN #7930


What’s New in the 2010-What’s New in the 2010-2011 ARD Manual?2011 ARD Manual?

Federal and State Federal and State RequirementsRequirements

11

The Elementary and The Elementary and Secondary Education Act Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA)of 1965 (ESEA)

Also known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB) ESEA limits number of proficient assessment

results from alternate assessments that may be included in federal AYP performance calculationsTAKS–M proficient results = cap of 2% of tested populationTAKS–Alt proficient results = cap of 1% of tested population

The limit on proficient alternate assessment results is referred to as the AYP federal cap


12

There are no student-level consequences for exceeding cap limit.

The federal cap does NOT limit the number of students with disabilities who can take alternate assessmentsdecisions regarding appropriate assessments for

students with disabilities should be made based on policies and procedures outlined in the ARD manual.

The Elementary and The Elementary and Secondary Education Act Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA)of 1965 (ESEA)


Components of the 2010Components of the 2010Texas Assessment Texas Assessment

ProgramProgram

14

General AssessmentsGeneral AssessmentsTAKS and TAKS TAKS and TAKS (Accommodated)(Accommodated)

TAKS & TAKS (Accommodated)* are administered in English for Grades 3–9 reading, including SSI retests at grades 5 & 8 Grades 3–10 and exit level mathematics, including SSI retests at grades 5 & 8

andexit level retests Grades 4 and 7 writing Grade 10 and exit level ELA, including exit level retests Grades 5, 8, 10, and exit level science, including exit level retests Grades 8, 10, and exit level social studies, including exit level retests

TAKS & TAKS (Accommodated)* are administered in Spanish for Grades 3–5 reading, including SSI retests at grade 5 Grades 3–5 mathematics, including SSI retests at grade 5 Grade 4 writing Grade 5 science


*TAKS (Accommodated) is for students receiving special education services who meet the eligibility criteria for specific accommodations.

15

Alternate AssessmentsAlternate AssessmentsTAKSTAKS–M and TAKSM and TAKS–AltAlt

TAKS–M– Administered in English in same grades and subjects as TAKS– Not available in Spanish– No exit level assessments but grade 11 assessments– Includes all SSI retest opportunities but no grade 11 retest opportunities

TAKS–Alt– Administered in same grades and subjects as TAKS– No exit level assessments but grade 11 assessments– No SSI retest opportunities and no grade 11 retest opportunities– Can be administered using any language or other communication method routinely used with

student


16

Linguistically Linguistically Accommodated Testing Accommodated Testing (LAT)(LAT)

Is available for– Grades 3-8 reading and grade 10 ELA– Grades 3-8 and 10 mathematics – Grades 5, 8, and 10 science

Assessment process for immigrant English language learners (ELLs) who meet eligibility criteria in accordance with state and federal law

Enables eligible immigrant ELLs to take TAKS, including TAKS (Accommodated), and TAKS-M with linguistic accommodations that help them better understand the language used on tests


17

Texas English Language Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment Proficiency Assessment System (TELPAS)System (TELPAS)

Measures the progress ELLs make in learning English Composed of multiple-choice tests and holistically rated

assessments based on ongoing classroom observations and written student work

Grades 2-12 reading tests are administered as an online testing program (in rare cases a paper-based administration may be approved by TEA for a student)

Grades K-1 reading and K-12 listening, speaking, and writing are administered holistically


Excellent Excellent source of source of

information information at a glance: at a glance:

“TAKS “TAKS Assessment Assessment Comparison Comparison

Chart for Chart for Students Students Receiving Receiving

Special Special Education Education Services” Services”

page 6page 6

The Four Steps in The Four Steps in Making Assessment Making Assessment

DecisionsDecisions

Formal Evaluation Data Classroom Data Accommodations and

Modifications

Parent Information Additional Supports

21

Step 1:Step 1: Review the student’s present levelof academic achievement and functional performance (PLAAFP).

A student’s PLAAFP is the basis of the IEP because it defines where a student is, both academically and functionally. PLAAFP statements can be created using various types of information.


Knowing where the student is currently, both academically and functionally, will inform the ARD committee’s assessment decision.

Step 1: Step 1: Review the student’s present level of academic achievement and functional performance (PLAAFP).

A resource relevant to Step 1 is indicated with in the ARD manual.

Standards-Based IEPs Goal Development Online Training 2009-2010

Available through Region 20 Education Service Center


23

Step 2: Step 2: Review the student’s instructional plan, including accommodations, modifications, or supports the student will need in order to access the grade-level TEKS.

An instructional plan takes into consideration a student’s PLAAFP and the grade-level TEKS. It provides a detailed look at how the student accesses the grade-level curriculum, specifically whether the student is receiving instruction in the:

grade-level TEKS (with or without accommodations) grade-level TEKS accessed through modifications (with or

without accommodations) grade-level TEKS accessed through prerequisite skills

Members of the ARD committee must be familiar with the state-mandated curriculum for each grade level.

Instructional decisions made by the ARD committee and documented in the IEP must always guide assessment decisions.


24


Understanding the differences between accommodations and modifications is important when determining how the student accesses the grade-level curriculum.

Accommodations provide a student access to grade-level instruction and assessment but do not reduce learning expectations.

Modifications refer to practices that do change, lower, or reduce learning expectations; they may allow students to participate more meaningfully and productively in learning.

The chart, “Access to the Grade-Level Curriculum,” is designed to clarify the connection between the state assessments and instructional strategies that allow a student to access the grade-level curriculum.


Access to the Grade-Level Curriculum, ARD manual page 13

2525

• TAKS or TAKS (Accommodated)

• TAKS-M

• TAKS-Alt

• Reducing the complexity of problems by limiting the number of steps in multi-step problems

• Providing varying levels of cueing and prompting to ease the student toward independence

• Providing extra time to complete assignments

• Grade-level, state-mandated curriculum with or without accommodations

• TEKS instruction using modifications

• TEKS instruction focusing on academic prerequisite skills

• Scaffolding skills or lessons to facilitate student understanding

Resources relevant to Step 2 are indicated with in the ARD manual.

The Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS)

Standards-Based IEPs Goal Development Online Training 2009-2010

Available through Region 20 Education Service Center

26



Step 3: Step 3: Determine the appropriate assessment for the student: TAKS, TAKS (Accommodated), TAKS–M, or TAKS–Alt.

Understanding the Assessment Options ARD committee members must be

knowledgeable about the differences between the state assessments. TAKS TAKS (Accommodated) TAKS–M TAKS–Alt

Brief descriptions of the four assessment options can be found on page 14 of the 2010-2011 ARD Manual.

279/15/2010 TETN #7930



Choosing the Assessment Based on Student Access Assessment decisions ARE based on

individual student needs as determined by ARD committee.

Assessment decisions ARE NOT determined administratively.

Assessment decisions ARE NOT based solely on student’s disability category or placement setting.

289/15/2010 TETN #7930


Step 3: Step 3: Determine the appropriate assessment for the student: TAKS, TAKS (Accommodated), TAKS–M, or TAKS–Alt. Participation in one of the general assessments, TAKS or TAKS (Accommodated), should be the first consideration when determining the appropriate assessment for a student. The ARD committee must address the following questions: Does the student receive instruction in the grade-level

TEKS for this subject with or without accommodations? If yes, then the student takes TAKS for this subject.

Does the student receive instruction in the grade-level TEKS for this subject with specific accommodations that are allowed or approved for use on TAKS (Accommodated)? If yes, then the student takes TAKS (Accommodated) for this subject.



If an alternate assessment, TAKS–M or TAKS–Alt, is being considered, the ARD committee must review the participation requirements on pages 17-19 in the ARD Manual. The ARD committee cannot recommend an alternate assessment if the student does not meet the participation requirements. Does the student access the grade-level TEKS for this subject

through modifications? Does the student meet all of the participation requirements for TAKS–M? If yes, then the ARD committee may decide that the student’s knowledge and skills for this subject can best be assessed with TAKS–M.

Does the student have a significant cognitive disability that requires the student to access the grade-level TEKS through prerequisite skills? Does the student meet all of the participation requirements for TAKS–Alt? If yes, then the ARD committee may decide that the student’s knowledge and skills can best be assessed with TAKS–Alt.

309/15/2010 TETN #7930


A significant cognitive disability affects the overall learning potential for an individual and limits what an individual may be able to achieve.A student with a learning disability does have the learning potential

to achieve grade-level expectations; however, the individual may have difficulty reaching his or her potential due to the disability.

A student with a learning disability is not considered a student with a significant cognitive disability.

319/15/2010 TETN #7930



Students taking TAKS–Alt will take TAKS–Alt for all subjects assessed at the student’s enrolled grade.In some rare instances a student with a

significant cognitive disability may access the grade-level curriculum through modifications for some subjects and through prerequisite skills linked to the grade-level TEKS for other subjects. When this occurs, the ARD committee must determine which assessment is best for this student overall, since a student cannot be assessed with TAKS–M in some subjects and TAKS–Alt in other subjects.

329/15/2010 TETN #7930




Changing the Assessment Decision During the School Year As part of the ongoing process of monitoring the

special education program for a student, the ARD committee may feel the assessment decision made at a previous meeting needs to be changed because of a change in the student’s instructional plan. This change may be due to a change in how the student accesses the grade-level

curriculum, a revision to the student’s instructional goals, or the addition or removal of certain accommodations.

Simply passing or failing a state assessment is not a sufficient reason to justify revising the assessment decision in the IEP.


An assessment decision may also need to be changed when a student is dismissed from special education services. A student who is dismissed from special education

services must perform satisfactorily on TAKS, as only students receiving special education services are eligible to participate in TAKS (Accommodated), TAKS–M, or TAKS–Alt.

An ARD committee should have confidence that a student who is dismissed from special education will be able to successfully complete all of the requirements for high school graduation, including satisfactory performance on the statewide exit level assessments.

34



Any changes to assessment decisions must be considered carefully because the requirements of different assessments may impact a

student (e.g., SSI requirements for multiple testing opportunities, requirements for graduating on the Recommended or Distinguished high school program).

the student must be given adequate time to learn the content that is included on the specific assessment that will be administered.

adequate time for repeated observations will need to be considered when TAKS–Alt is selected as the student’s assessment, since a TAKS–Alt assessment observation can be repeated until the student demonstrates a typical performance or to provide a generalization opportunity.

35




Released test/items and TAKS information booklets can be found on the Student Assessment webpage.

TAKS–M Resources webpage and TAKS–Alt Resources webpage

Module 1, “Overview of the TAKS–Alt Assessment,” can be found on the TAKS–Alt Resources webpage.


37

Step 4: Step 4: Document the appropriate assessment, including the accommodations or supports the student will need during the assessment.

ARD committees must document the following in a student’s IEP when an alternate assessment is selected:why the student cannot participate in TAKS or

TAKS (Accommodated),

why the selected alternate assessment is appropriate, and

what accommodations are necessary to measure the student’s academic achievement.


38

For TAKS–Alt, ARD committees determine and document if a student has a significant cognitive disability and meets all the participation requirements. Instructional materials, strategies, accommodations, and supports should also be documented in the student’s IEP.

Step 4: Step 4: Document the appropriate assessment, including the accommodations or supports the student will need during the assessment




“Summary of ARD Assessment Decisions” form and “2011 Student Roster” on the ARD Committee Resources webpage

2010-2011 Accommodations Manual on the Accommodations Resources webpage

“Assessment Decision Process for the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills–Alternate (TAKS–Alt)” document on the TAKS–Alt Resources webpage

Step 4: Step 4: Document the appropriate assessment, including the accommodations or supports the student will need during the assessment.

Student ScenariosStudent Scenarios 9 student examples are described on pages 21-

23 of the ARD Manual to assist ARD committees in determining whether TAKS, TAKS (Accommodated), TAKS–M, or TAKS–Alt is the most appropriate assessment. These examples illustrate how assessment decisions should be made using information about a student’s individualized instruction, including the accommodations, modifications, or supports the student requires in order to access the grade-level TEKS.


ELLs Receiving ELLs Receiving Special Education Special Education

ServicesServices

These students have special needs related to a disability as well as needs related to second language learning.

The ARD committee and the LPAC must—– work together to ensure that instruction is tailored

to meet each student’s linguistic and special education needs

– collaborate on assessment decisions for these students, both in terms of appropriate participation in assessments and appropriate use of accommodations during testing (19 TAC §101.1009 (b)) 42The term ELLs is used interchangeably with

LEP students

Note that…

There are some differences for: ELLs who are LEP-exempt (an exemption on

the basis of limited English proficiency) ELLs who qualify for special provisions as

unschooled asylees or refugees43

ELLs Served by Special ELLs Served by Special EducationEducation

With few exceptions, ELLs who receive special education services have the same

assessment requirements as other students receiving special education

services.


LEP Exemptions & LATLEP Exemptions & LAT

State-defined criteria are used to determine the need for a LEP exemption.

A student may be LEP-exempt from TAKS, TAKS (Accommodated), or TAKS–M.

There are no LEP exemptions for TAKS–Alt because it can be administered using any language or other communication method routinely used with the student.

To meet federal requirements, LEP-exempt students take LAT administrations of TAKS, TAKS (Accommodated), or TAKS–M in certain grades and subjects.

449/15/2010 TETN #7930


LEP Exemptions & LATLEP Exemptions & LAT

State regulations that went into effect in the 2009–2010 school year include extended LAT testing provisions for a small number of students determined to be unschooled ELL asylees and refugees who are beyond the LEP exemption period.

45

For more information, see the LPAC Decision-

Making Process for the Texas Assessment Program manual.


Required by federal law for LEP students in grades K–12. Because its purpose is to measure growth in English

language acquisition, TELPAS should be an appropriate assessment tool for the vast majority of ELLs served by special education.

In very rare cases the ARD committee and the LPAC may determine that a student should not be assessed in one or more domains due to a student’s particular disability.

See the LPAC Decision-Making Process for the Texas Assessment Program manual for more information about appropriate participation in TELPAS of ELLs receiving special education services.

46

TELPASTELPAS


SSI Requirements forSSI Requirements forStudents Receiving Students Receiving

Special Education Special Education ServicesServices

48

Applies to students in grades 5 & 8 who take TAKS, TAKS (Accommodated), and TAKS–M reading and mathematics tests Does not apply to students who take TAKS-Alt or students who

qualify for LAT ARD committee* functions as the grade placement committee

(GPC) to make decisions regarding appropriate assessment, accelerated instruction, and grade placement.

ARD committee decisions do not have to be unanimous but must follow the general rules governing ARD committee decision-making as set forth in 19 TAC, Chapter 89, Subchapter AA.

*In the case of an ELL receiving special education services, the student’s In the case of an ELL receiving special education services, the student’s LPAC and ARD committee should collaborate to make assessment LPAC and ARD committee should collaborate to make assessment decisions.decisions.

Student Success Student Success Initiative (SSI)Initiative (SSI)


49

A resource relevant to the Student Success Initiative (SSI) is indicated with in the ARD Manual.

The Grade Placement Committee Manual for Grade Advancement Requirements of the Student Success Initiative (GPC Manual)

Student Success Student Success Initiative (SSI)Initiative (SSI)


Graduation Flowcharts Graduation Flowcharts for Students Receiving for Students Receiving

Special Education Special Education ServicesServices

There were minor changes to the flowcharts from last year’s manual, but no policy changes.

Flowchart A: Exit level/grade 11 testing requirements for students who entered grade 9 in 2008–2009 school year, including all students who enter grade 9 after 2008–2009 Students must pass TAKS or TAKS (Accommodated) exit

level assessments to graduate under Distinguished or Recommended high school programs.

Flowchart B: Exit level/grade 11 testing requirements for students who entered grade 9 prior to the 2008–2009 school yearRequirements of Commissioner’s Rules do not apply.

51

Graduation FlowchartsGraduation Flowcharts


TAKS–Alt and TAKS–M are not exit level assessments, but are grade-level assessmentsRetest opportunities for grade 11 are not applicable.Repeating 11th graders take the appropriate

assessment every year they are enrolled in grade 11.Alternate assessments are not administered to

students in grade 12. When considering dismissal from special education, ARD

committees should have confidence that the student will be able to successfully complete all requirements for high school graduation, including satisfactory performance on all statewide exit level assessments.

52

Graduation FlowchartsGraduation Flowcharts


MiscellaneousMiscellaneous

Updates and training opportunities can be found on the ARD Committee Resources page at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/resources/ard.

Informati0n to help ARD Committees prepare for the STAAR program beginning in 2011-2012 will be posted on the Special Education Assessments webpage as it becomes available.

http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/special-ed/index.html

549/15/2010 TETN #7930


MiscellaneousMiscellaneous





8/18/2010 (#7928) 2010-2011 Accommodations Manual Training 9/1/2010 (#7929) TAKS–Alt training and general updates 9/15/2010 (#7930) 2010-2011 ARD Manual Training 9/16/2010 (#7871) Fall ELL Assessment Update 10/8/2010 (#8301) Accessing TAKS–Alt Online System 12/16/2010 (#8126) Annual LPAC Manual Training 1/5/2011 (#7932) Accountability updates/info and updates to TAKS–Alt

procedures 1/7/2011 (#8302) TELPAS Spring Online Training System 2/11/2011 (#8237) LAT Procedures 3/24/2011 (#7933) Questions concerning upcoming tests and the close of

the TAKS–Alt submission window 5/12/2011 (#7960) Special Education Assessments preview for 2011-2012

2010-2011 Student 2010-2011 Student Assessment TETN Schedule Assessment TETN Schedule

56

TEA Student Assessment TEA Student Assessment Division Contact Division Contact

Information Information – Phone: (512) 463-9536 Fax: (512) 463-9302 – Website: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment

– Special Education Assessments website: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/special-ed/index.html

– General e-mail: [email protected]

– Accommodations e-mail: [email protected]

– TAKS (Accommodated) and TAKS-M e-mail: [email protected]

– TAKS-Alt e-mail: [email protected]

– ELL e-mail: [email protected]

http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment

http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment


mailto:[email protected]





2010-2011 ard committee decision-making process for the texas assessment program (ard manual)

Documents

assessment decisionsells

state assessment decisions

texas assessment programthe

tea footer

ard committees

ard committee meetings

ard manualprovide guidance

ard committee resources