©2009 mcgraw-hill ryerson limited 1 of 40 11 cost of capital prepared by: michel paquet sait...
TRANSCRIPT
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited1 of 40
1111 Cost of CapitalCost of Capital
Prepared by:
Michel PaquetSAIT Polytechnic
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited2 of 40
Chapter 11 - Outline
• What is the Cost of Capital?
• Components and Calculation of Cost of Capital
• Optimal Capital Structure
• Use of Cost of Capital
• Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
• Summary and Conclusions
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited3 of 40
Learning Objectives
1. Explain that the cost of capital represents the overall cost of financing to the firm. (LO1)
2. Define the cost of capital as the discount rate normally used to analyze an investment. It is an evaluation tool. (LO2)
3. Calculate the cost of capital based on the various valuation techniques from Chapter 10 as applied to bonds, preferred stock and common shares. (LO3)
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited4 of 40
Learning Objectives
4. Describe how a firm attempts to find a minimum cost of capital by varying the mix of its sources of financing. (LO4)
5. Explain the marginal cost of capital concept. (LO5)
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited5 of 40
Cost of Capital
• The cost of capital is a measure of the overall cost of financing to a firm.
• It is the discount rate used to discount future cash flows from an investment.
• It is the minimal rate of return that an investment of the same risk as the firm should earn.
• Using the cost of capital to make investment decisions eliminates inconsistency.
LO1/LO2
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited6 of 40
Cost of Capital
• The cost of capital is a weighted average cost of the various sources of capital, including debt, preferred stock, and common equity (retained earnings):
WACC = Weighted Average Cost of Capital
WACC = The sum of the weighted (aftertax) cost of each source of capital
• If a firm changes its financial leverage (capital structure), its cost of capital will also change accordingly.
LO1/LO2
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited7 of 40
Table 11-1Cost of capital–Baker Corporation
(1) (2) (3) Cost Weights Weighted (after tax) Cost
Debt . . . . . . . . . . Kd 6.55% 30% 1.97%
Preferred stock . . . . Kp 10.94 10 1.09
Common equity(retained earnings) . . . Ke 12.00 60 7.20
Weighted averagecost of capital . . . . . Ka 10.26%
LO3
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited8 of 40
Components and Calculation of Cost of Capital
1. Cost of Debt- The cost of debt to the firm is the effective yield
to maturity (or interest rate) paid to its bondholders.
- Two adjustments must be made to the yield: tax and flotation costs.
- Aftertax cost of debt:(1 )
1d
Y TK
F
LO3
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited9 of 40
Components and Calculation of Cost of Capital
2. Cost of Preferred Stock- Preferred stock:
• has a fixed dividend (similar to debt)• has no maturity date• dividends are not tax deductible to the firm
and are expected to be perpetual or infinite- Cost of preferred stock:
LO3
F
PDK pp
p
1
/FP
DK
p
p
p
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited10 of 40
Components and Calculation of Cost of Capital
3. Cost of Common Equity– Common stock equity is available through
retained earnings (R/E) or by issuing new common stock:
Common equity = R/E + New common stock
A. Cost of Retained Earnings• The cost of common equity in the form of retained earnings is
equal to the required rate of return on the firm’s common stock (this is the opportunity cost):
1
0e
DK g
P
LO3
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited11 of 40
Components and Calculation of Cost of Capital
B. Cost of New Common Stock– The cost of new common stock is higher than the
cost of retained earnings because of flotation costs
– Cost of new common stock:
or
• Cost of common equity can also be determined with the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
01
0n
n
PDK g
P P
1
0
1
DP
n
gK
F
LO3
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited12 of 40
Components and Calculation of Cost of Capital
C. Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)– An alternative model for calculating the required rate of return on
common stock to the dividend model– Based on a relationship between risk and return: Required return = risk-free rate + risk premium– Cost of retained earnings
– Cost of new common stock
or
j f j m fK R R R
1j
jn
KK
F
0
jn jn
PK K
P
LO3
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited13 of 40
Optimum Capital Structure
The optimum (best) situation is associated with the minimum overall cost of capital (WACC):– Costs of individual components of financing
weighed by their proportions (weights) in the firm’s capital structure produce WACC
– Optimum capital structure means the lowest WACC– Usually occurs with 40-70% debt in a firm’s capital
structure– Based upon the market value rather than the book
value of the firm’s debt and equity
LO4
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited14 of 40
FIGURE 11-1Cost of capitalcurve
LO4
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited15 of 40
Debt/Assets,Selected Companies with Industry Designation Percent
AbitibiBowater (forest products) AXB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84Air Canada (airlines) AC.A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80Bank of Montreal (financials) BMO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95Canadian Tire (consumer discretion) CTC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47Encana (energy) ECA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52Nortel (networks) NT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84Melcor (real estate) MRD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60Potash (fertilizers) POT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11Loblaw(consumer staples) L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59RIM (wireless solutions) RIM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28Teck Cominco (mining) TCK.A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
Table 11-3
Debt (total) to total assets, mid-2008
LO4
Source: www.tsx.com
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited16 of 40
FIGURE 11-2Cost of capitalover time
LO4
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited17 of 40
Use of The Cost of Capital
• The cost of capital (WACC) represents the overall rate of return required by a firm’s investors – bondholders, preferred shareholders and common shareholders.
• Investments must be judged against this benchmark regardless of the particular source of funds the firm is using for a particular investment.
• If investments are matched with their financing, investments with lower return may be accepted while those with higher return would be rejected.
LO4
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited18 of 40
Figure 11-3Cost of capital and investment projects for the Baker Corporation
16.0
14.0
12.0
10.0
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
Percent
10 15 19 5039Amount of capital ($ millions)
10.26%
70 85 95
Weighted average cost of capital
Ka
A
BC
D
EF
GH
-----
----
LO2/LO4
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited19 of 40
Table 11-4Investment projects available to the Baker Corporation
A . . . . 16.00% $10B . . . . 14.00 5C . . . . 13.50 4D . . . . 11.80 20E . . . . 10.40 11F . . . . 9.50 20G . . . . 8.60 15H . . . . 7.00 10
$95
Expected CostProjects Returns ($ millions)
LO2/LO4
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited20 of 40
Marginal Cost of Capital
• A firm’s cost of debt or preferred stock or common stock increases as it uses more debt or preferred stock or common stock.
• This will lead to a higher cost of capital even if a given capital structure (the weights) is maintained.
• The marginal cost of capital measures a firm’s overall cost of receiving extra dollar from investors.
LO5
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited21 of 40
First $39 Million Next $11 Million
A/T Weighted A/T WeightedCost Wts. Cost Cost Wts. Cost
Debt . . . . Kd 6.55% .30 1.97% Debt . . . Kd 6.55% .30 1.97%
Preferred. . Kp 10.94 .10 1.09 Preferred . Kp 10.94 .10 1.09
Common Commonequity *. . Ke 12.00 .60 7.20 equity † . . Kn 13.33 .60 8.00
Ka = 10.26% Kmc = 11.06%
*Retained earnings †New common equity
Table 11-5Cost of capital for different amounts of financing
LO5
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited22 of 40
Over $50 Million
Cost Weighted(after tax) Weights Cost
Debt (higher cost) Kd 7.90% .30 2.37%
Preferred stock Kp 10.94 .10 1.09
Common equity (new common stock) Kn 13.33 .60 8.00
Kmc = 11.46%
Table 11-6Cost of capital for increasing amounts of financing
LO5
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited23 of 40
Figure 11-4Marginal cost of capital and Baker Corporation investment alternatives
16.0
14.0
12.0
10.0
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
Percent
10 15 19 5039Amount of capital ($ millions)
11.46%
70 85 95
Marginal cost of capital
Kmc
A
BC
D EF
GH
11.06%
10.26%
-----
----
LO5
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited24 of 40
Table 11-7Cost of components in the capital structure
1. Cost of debt Kd = Yield (1-T) = 6.55%
2. Cost of preferred stock
3. Cost of common equity
(retained earnings)
4. Cost of new common stock
KD
P F10.94%p
p
p
Yield = 10.74%
T = Corporate tax rate, 39%
Dp = Preferred dividend, $10.50
Pp = Price of preferred stock, $100
F = Flotation costs, $4
D1 = First year common dividend, $2
Pc = price of common stock, $40
g = growth rate, 7%
Same as above, with Pn =$36.00
F = Flotation costs, $4,
12.0%gPD
K0
1e
13.33%PP
gPD
Kn
0
0
1n
LO3
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited25 of 40
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
• Relates the risk-return trade-offs of individual assets to market returns.
• Suggests that as some portion of risk can be diversified away, the extra return should only be based on the remaining portion of risk that can not be diversified away.
mathematically,
j j mK R e
APP-11A
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited26 of 40
TABLE 11A-1Performance of PAI and the market
APP-11A
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited27 of 40
FIGURE 11A-1Linear regressionof returns betweenPAI and the market
APP-11A
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited28 of 40
Year Kj Rm
1. . . . . 12% 10%2. . . . . 16% 18%3. . . . . 20% 16%4. . . . . 16% 10%5. . . . . 6% 8%
70% 62%
Kj Rm Kj Rm Rm2 ( Rm )
2
936 4,340 844 3,844
n Kj Rm – Kj Rm 5(936) - 4,340j n Rm
2 – ( Rm )2 5(844) - 3,844
Kj – Rm 70 - 0.9 (62)n 5
Figure 11A-1bLinear regression of returns between PAI
and the market
APP-11A
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited29 of 40
Figure 11A-1cLinear regression of returns between PAI and the marketCalculator
Mode: Stat
Input 10 (x,y) 12 Data
18 (x,y) 16 Data
16 (x,y) 20 Data
10 (x,y) 16 Data
8 (x,y) 6 Data
2ndF a gives 2.79
2ndF b gives .90
2ndF r gives .74
Note that the values for the x axis(Rm) are input first
This is the alpha coefficient
This is the beta coefficient
This is the correlation coefficient, a measure of how well the formula describes the relationship. The closer to 1.00, the better the fit
APP-11A
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited30 of 40
FIGURE 11A-2The security market line (SML)
APP-11A
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited31 of 40
FIGURE 11A-3The security market line andchanging interest rates
APP-11A
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited32 of 40
FIGURE 11A-4The security market line andchanging investor expectations
APP-11A
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited33 of 40
Capital Structure Theory
• Net Income (NI) Approach
• Net Operating Income (NOI) Approach
• Modigliani and Miller Model
APP-11B
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited34 of 40
Cost of capital (percent)
Debt/value ratio (percent)
Value of the firm ($)
Debt/value ratio (percent)
Ke = Cost of Equity: Kd = Cost of debt; Ka = Cost of capitalValue is the market value of the firm
0 100 0 100
Kd
Ke
Ka
Figure 11B-1Net Income (NI) Approach
APP-11B
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited35 of 40
Figure 11B-2Net Operating Income (NOI) Approach
Cost of capital (percent) Value of the firm ($)
Debt/value ratio (percent) Debt/value ratio (percent) 0 0 100 100
Ke
Ka
Kd
APP-11B
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited36 of 40
Figure 11B-3Traditional approach as described by Durand
Ke
Ka
Kd
0 100 0 100
APP-11B
Cost of capital (percent)
Debt/value ratio (percent)
Value of the firm ($)
Debt/value ratio (percent)
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited37 of 40
Figure 11B-4Modigliani and Miller with corporate taxes
Cost of capital (percent) Value of the firm ($)
Debt/value ratio (percent) Debt/value ratio (percent)0 100 0 100
Cost of debtadjusted for the tax effect of interest
Ke
Ka
Kd
VL
VU
APP-11B
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited38 of 40
Figure 11B-5aCombined impact of the corporate tax effect and bankruptcy effect on valuation and cost of capital
0 100
Ka (M +M with tax effect and bankruptcy effect)
Ka (original M + M)
Ka (M + M with tax effect)
APP-11B
A. Cost of capital (percent)
Debt/value ratio (percent)
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited39 of 40
Figure 11B-5bCombined impact of the corporate tax effect and bankruptcy effect on valuation and cost of capital
0 100
VL (M + M with tax effect)
VU (original M +M)
(M + M with tax effect and bankruptcy effect)
APP-11B
B. Value of the firm ($)
Debt/value ratio (percent)
©2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited40 of 40
Summary and Conclusions
• The cost of capital is calculated as the weighted average of costs from various sources of financing (WACC).
• The weightings are based on the market value of the existing capital structure.
• Firms choose the weights to minimize WACC.• The cost of capital is used as an evaluation tool
to analyze investment proposals.