2009-10-28 mirc creating harmonized meat standards
TRANSCRIPT
Kerry R. Smith, Ph.D.Livestock and Meat Marketing Specialist
USDA, Agricultural Marketing ServiceLivestock and Seed Program
Creating Harmonized Creating Harmonized Meat Standards for Meat Standards for
Domestic and Domestic and International SectorsInternational Sectors
Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946
Directs the Secretary to, ◦ “…develop and improve standards of quality, condition, quantity, grade, and packaging, and recommend and demonstrate such standards in order to encourage uniformity and consistency in commercial practices.”
◦ “…inspect, certify, and identify the class, quality, quantity, and condition of agricultural products when shipped or received in interstate commerce, under such rules and regulations as the Secretary of Agriculture may prescribe…”
The MISSION of AMS is to facilitate the
competitive and efficient marketing of agricultural
products.
Auditing Quality Management Systems for unique marketing
claims
Reporting on the markets
Adding value through grading &
certification
Agricultural Marketing ServiceAgricultural Marketing Service
Helping convey quality attributes to the consumer
What is our purpose?What is our purpose?The principle behind the shieldThe principle behind the shield
Identify Differences of Value
Identify Consumer Preference
Transmit Signals to Industry
Assist in Promotion and Marketing
Benefits of StandardizationBenefits of Standardization
Marketing tool for meat and meat products for
producers/processors
Guide to meat quality for consumers/purchasers
Maintains link to research and academia and industry
needs
Facilitate fair international trade and prevent
technical barriers to trade
Promote high quality, sustainable production
Create market transparency for buyers and
consumers
Class/Quality StandardsClass/Quality Standards
Develop and Maintain U.S. Grade Standards◦ Live and Carcass
Current Projects◦ Catfish (Farm Bill)◦ Bison◦ Live animal – sheep◦ Goat
Performance StandardsPerformance Standards
Instrument Grading◦ Innovative technology for carcass assessments◦ Image based assessment
Obtain image, determine numerous metrics, calculate factors using approved equations
Utilize beef carcass factors to determine official quality and yield grades and certifying branded programs◦ COLLABORATION – Government, trade associations,
industry, and academia◦ Precise, accurate, uniform prediction equation
developed from evaluating 1.2 million carcasses
Performance StandardsPerformance Standards
Beef◦ 7 plants approved + 2 next week◦ Represents 26,000 head/day
Lamb◦ Assessment of lamb carcass lean-meat yields◦ 4 trials – seasonal variation
1st trail (Fall) completed
Product SpecificationsProduct Specifications
Institutional Meat Purchasing Specifications (IMPS)◦ All species◦ Series 100 (fresh beef) and 400 (fresh pork) under
revision◦ Draft versions - Comment period closed
http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/LSIMPSRevision
North American Meat ProcessorsUniform Retail Meat Identity Standards (URMIS)◦ Retail uniform product codes
Marketing Claim StandardsMarketing Claim Standards
Indentify needRequest input from stakeholdersPropose in Federal Register—public commentAnalyze commentsPublish final marketing claim
Marketing Claim StandardsMarketing Claim Standards
Grass FedNaturally Raised
Currently, there are NO regulatory definitions for many (there are some exceptions) of the animal productions claims◦ 1st Amend. Rights – FSIS does not restrict companies to
only one standard – not false or misleading
IndustryVoluntary Consensus Standards
Tenderness – ASTM
Standardization ProcessStandardization Process
Industry verses Government Standards
Regulatory verses Voluntary
Domestic verses International
Role of AMSRole of AMSDevelop Global PartnershipsDevelop Global Partnerships
AMS helps develop new global partnerships to promote trade in agricultural products
USDA’s participation in creating international standards for meat products works towards seamless international commerce
International ServiceInternational Service
AMS works with multiple countries to conduct audits for Process Verified Programs to make specific claims/production practices
24 different international market reports creates a transparent global marketplace
International Standards BodyInternational Standards Body
The U.S. Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Technical Committee 34 for Food Products/Subcommittee 6 for Meat and Meat Products is administered by the LS Program (for the American National Standards Institute).
TAG is responsible for formulating United States positions relative to the development and maintenance of ISO standards in the field of meat and meat product foodstuffs, as well as sampling, methods of test and analysis, product specifications, and requirements for packaging, storage, and transportation of meat and meat products.
TAG is currently developing a number of issues including international meat product standards/codification as well as standards for maximum residue limits.
International Standards BodyInternational Standards Body
The LS Program has been appointed to the U.S. TAG to ISO/TC 176 to represent the interests of the U.S. agricultural industry in the development of international quality management and assurance standards.
◦ The LS Program also is continuing its investment in ISO 9000 training of its employees to ensure its capability to provide technical assistance to U.S. companies that wish to incorporate ISO 9000 quality system management and assurance into their manufacturing processes.
International Standards BodyInternational Standards Body
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe ◦ LS Program is the Vice-Chair of the Specialized
Section on Standardization of Meat in the Working Party on Agricultural Quality Standards◦ Committee for Trade, Industry, and Enterprise
Development◦ Composed of representatives from North American,
South American, European, and Asian countries.
A number of standards are currently under review, including meat cut standards for Porcine, Ovine, Carpine, and Bovine. ◦ A standard for retail meat cut items is currently
being drafted by the LS Program.
UNECE Standard UNECE Standard for Retail Meat cutsfor Retail Meat cuts
Describes retail items commonly cut and derived from existing cuts
Defines a coding system for communication and electronic trade
Myology based
Setting the StandardsSetting the Standards
FULL RIB PLATE
ST. LOUIS STYLE RIBS
Different countries and regions use different
codes for cuts of meat UNECE #4162
IMPS #416AURMIS #4163
Action PlanAction Plan
Coding - 4 digit – Utilizing species
1st 2nd 3rd - 4th
Location Species Retail cut1 = Leg 1 = Bovine Bone-in, Boneless2 = Sirloin 2 = Veal # 1-49 = Bone-in3 = Loin 3 = Porcine # 50-99 = Boneless4 = Rib/Blade 4 = Ovine5 = Shoulder/Blade 5 = Caprine6 = Shoulder/Arm7 = Rib Cuts8 = Belly9 = Thin Cuts, Misc
Action Plan Action Plan –– Location codeLocation code
1- Leg
3 - Loin
4 – Rib/Blade
5 – Shoulder/Blade
8 - Belly
2 - Sirloin
9 - Thin cuts, misc.
6 – Shoulder/Arm
7 - Rib cuts
Action PlanAction Plan
EXAMPLE with species 1st, cut location 2nd
Retail Cut # 3370Porcine, loin, tenderloin (bnls)
Concerns• Existing code conflicts• Common language – muscle nomenclature
Action Plan Action Plan –– Purchaser Specified Purchaser Specified RequirementsRequirements
Purchaser-specified requirements◦ 3.x Fat trim specifications◦ 3.x Tail lengths◦ 3.x Thickness parameters
Roast, Steak, Slice◦ 3.x Cutting style
Cubed, cutlets, filets, strips, skinless3.x Weight requirements
What can be consistent across species?What might need require different modules?
Action Plan Action Plan –– WhatWhat’’s next?s next?
Gather country specific retail cuts with codes and namesCross reference cuts from various coding schemes Rapporteurs meeting on beef retail cuts◦ November 16-20, 2009◦ Oklahoma State University – Stillwater, OK
Retail cut fabricationPhotography
Beef Retail cuts Standard Draft – Spring 2010Pork retail cuts draft – October UNECE
Limitations of International Limitations of International StandardsStandards
Many countries do not adopt international standards◦ WTO rules provide little leverage◦ Regulatory processes trump trade pressure
Gaps in international standards◦ Lack of funding to develop new standards ◦ Consensus driven processes tend to be slow◦ Major players often cannot agree
Conflicting voluntary standards
ResolutionResolution
HarmonizationHarmonize the technical message in international organizations.
SimplificationSimplify the message so consumers can understand the technical issues.
InformationInform consumers on technical issues.
Promote science-based regulatory systems◦ Strengthen strategic focus of existing USDA
international training and technical assistance programs.◦ Work with partners to leverage resources and add
credibility.
Thank You!Thank You!
(202) 720-4486www.ams.usda.gov/LSProgram
www.ams.usda.gov/SAT