2008 annual meeting ● assemblée annuelle 2008 québec
DESCRIPTION
Canadian Institute of Actuaries. L’Institut canadien des actuaires. 2008 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2008 Québec. Does IASB matter for Group Insurance?. Annual General Meeting IP 36 June 19, 2008 David Congram. IFRS – Moving Towards a Global Standard. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
2008 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2008
Québec
2008 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2008
Québec
Canadian Institute
of Actuaries
Canadian Institute
of Actuaries
L’Institut canadien desactuaires
L’Institut canadien desactuaires
Does IASB matter for Group Insurance?
Annual General Meeting IP 36
June 19, 2008
David Congram
IFRS – Moving Towards a Global Standard
Fixed deadlines for IFRS implementation
Convergence plans
US-GAAP - Convergence intended
No intent to converge with IFRS
• Primary attributes of IFRS
• Timetables
• Phase I
• Phase II
• Implications
• Meeting the deadline
Agenda
Primary Attributes of IFRS
• Insurance to be subject to the same general principles as other financial services firms
• Principles-based approach with additional guidance
• Consistency of treatment between insurance, investment management and banking products
• Proposal outlined in Phase II– Single measurement model for Life and non-life– Prospective valuation – Present Value of all future
cash flows– Paradigm of Current exit value - transfer value
Publicly Accountable Enterprises
• Life
• P&C
• Reinsurers
• Credit Union/Cooperatives
• Non Profit Member owned
• Government Owned Insurers
Canadian Owned Foreign Owned
IFRS - AcSB
IFRS – IASB
IFRS – EU
US – GAAP
IFRS - AUST
PSAB - GAAP
IFRS – AcSBIFRS – SMEDRAC
OSFI has designated that Federally Regulated Financial Institutions as PAE’s
AcSB’s, CSA and OSFI External Requirements
2009 2010 20112008
AcSB’s progress review
Qualitative disclosures of
differences (‘08 annual report)
Quantify effects of changeover to IFRS (‘09 annual
report)
Prepare comparative figures under
IFRS
March 2011first interim
reporting quarter end
with disclosures
Data capture for
Comparatives in 2011
OSFI progress
report
OSFI progress
report
OSFI progress
report
OSFI progress
report
OSFI progress
report
International Insurance Project Time table
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
IASC
IssuesPaper DSOP ED 5 IFRS 4
DiscussionPaper
ED X
Start
Insurance Project Steering
Committee
Phase I
Splitof Project
IASB
AdvisoryCommittee
Phase II
InsuranceWorking Group
DiscussionWith FASB
2013
Phase II
Application
Understanding IFRS 1
• Mandatory guidance for first time preparers
• First financial statement of unreserved compliance with IFRS
• Apply IFRS at the reporting date retrospectively
• Date of transition is first balance sheet• Recognize and de-recognize• Mandatory and optional exceptions from
retrospective application.
IFRS Phase I --> Phase IIIFRS Phase I --> Phase II
Assets Liabilities
IAS 39 for Invested Assets
IFRS 4 IAS 39 and some
aspects in IAS 32 and
IAS 18Phase II2013?
All Insurance Contracts and Investment Contracts with Discretionary
Participation Features
Other Investment Contracts and All
Service Contracts
Where does Group Insurance Fit?
Insured Business
Pooling
ASO
Review IAA Classification Paper - Highlights
Significant
insurance risk
Insurance
Contains service elements?
Contains Discretionary Participation
Feature?
IAS 18Service Contract
Measurement
Create financial assets or liabilities?
Split Embedded Derivative
No
Yes
Separate Deposit Component
Yes NoService Element
Financial Instrument
IAS 39Financial Instrument
Measurement
Yes No
IFRS 4 Measurement
Split Host from Embedded Derivative
and Deposit
Host
PRIMARY PROVISIONS OF IFRS 4
• Applies to Insurance Contracts—must have “significant insurance risk”
• Insurance contracts accounted under local GAAP, with certain restrictions (generally deferral and matching)
• Embedded derivatives at fair value (similar to FAS 133 treatment)
• Liability adequacy test• Insurance contract liabilities may be
adjusted for changes in interest rates
IAS 32 & 39 APPLY TO MOST ASSETS AND INVESTMENT
CONTRACTS
• Most other contracts held by insurance companies are investment contracts (do not meet definition of insurance)
• Held as amortized cost if considered “held to maturity” otherwise at fair value (with demand deposit floor)
SERVICE CONTRACTS
• Generally, contracts that are neither insurance contracts or investment contracts are service contracts– Claim service contracts (ASOs)– Self insurance of first layer of group
coverage
• Service component of an investment contract is to be separated
• Covered by IAS 18
In Phase 1
ASO will likely be measured under Service Contracts
Insurance Contract measurement through IFRS 4 will remain on the
existing accounting model
IAA Insurance Actuarial Practice Guidelines
Introduced July 25, 2005• IASP 9 Accounting for Reinsurance Contracts
• IASP 10 Embedded Derivatives and Derivatives
Introduced June 11, 2007
• IASP 2 Actuarial Practice
• IASP 3 Classification of Contracts
• IASP 4 Measurement
• IASP 5 Current Estimates
• IASP 6 Liability Adequacy Testing
• IASP 7 Discretionary Participation Features
• IASP 8 Changes in Accounting Policies
IFRS – Implementation 2010/11
• Assets – S 3855 re – designation allowed under IFRS 1
• Investment Contracts– Amortized Cost– Fair Value
• Service Contracts – Percentage of completion
• Insurance Contracts– Adjusted segments for CALM
• Tax implications
Conclusion Impact will depend on company’s position and mix of business
Earnings Phase II
• The “3 building blocks”
1. Current unbiased probability-weighted estimates of future cash flows (ie an expected value approach)
2. Current market discount rates that adjust the estimated future cash flows for the time value of money
3. An explicit unbiased estimate of the margin that market participants require for
• Bearing risk (a risk margin); and
• Providing other services (a service margin)
Unearned premiums
• Instead of recognizing premiums over the term of the policy:– All premiums and acquisition costs recognized
immediately - no unearned premium liability– Actuarial liabilities will include estimated future
claims and other cash flows for the remaining policy period
• As most policies operate on a 30 day billing period limited implications
Future premiums
Cash flows used in measuring insurance liabilities should include future premiums subject to one of the following
conditions being met
1. The policyholder must pay the premiums to retain a right to guaranteed insurability
2. The insurer can compel the policyholder to pay the premiums
3. Including the premiums and the resulting policyholder benefits will increase the measurement of the liability
Group contracts typically based on one year renewable terms
With competitive rates initial deficits and acquisition costs willnot be recoverable from future premiums in the accounting model
Impact on Capital?
• Mismatch risk• Use of risk free interest
rate• Credit risk• Total Balance Sheet
Impact on Products
• Product Classification
• Closer focus on options
• Embedded derivatives
• Deposit Components
• Longer for profits to be recognized
• Market indicators
• Lack of deep and liquid market
Meeting the Deadline
Planning phaseImplementation
phasePilot phase
Management Reporting
Classification
Accounting policy development
Programming and Testing
Chart of Accountchanges
Disclosure design
AssumptionDevelopment
2008 2009 2010
Recognition
Edu
catio
n
Controls
ExceptionsExemptions
Parallel Runs
User Education
Thank you