2000 oct.12- h. moore to judge anderson

Upload: anotheranonymom

Post on 10-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 2000 Oct.12- H. Moore to Judge Anderson

    1/4

    ,

    COURT SERVICES

    wmy Leonlwt. ~

    To: Judge Anderso!1WlA ~Fm: ftafiy MooreM"-Re: Dombrowski vs Richardson

    Dtd: 12 October 2000

    /

    Shawnee County Courmou:~

    200 5 71h. SUll

  • 8/8/2019 2000 Oct.12- H. Moore to Judge Anderson

    2/4

    -~~ ~ 'x~~ ...~ ~~ ,\' ,,~ ~

    ;?{~ "'Y~'" """- \)tJfS-~"issue of the coffin in Mr. Richardson's living room. ~ .,.~

    Another issue has arisen concerning a letter which the Court received from a Ms. Quail who isRikki's kindergarten teacher in Tecumseh North Elementary. Ms. Quall was the author of a letter

    which I believe is in the court file which indicates that Rikki had not eaten lunch prior to coming

    to school. Ms. Quall verified that she was indeed the author of this letter and that she had written..,J/l. it at MS.. Dombrowski's solicitation. Ms. Quall. also informed me that there was another piece to~ this issue which was not raised in the letter and that there was a follow up question to Rikki by

    school staff: that is, if you have not eaten lunch: are you hungry? The child reSponde

  • 8/8/2019 2000 Oct.12- H. Moore to Judge Anderson

    3/4

    ~ '4.l iG.Iu"""", .. .-._--- \I -.,-. ....-. pe..orQor\lML ~~~ ~.\c~,~,~ .:.;~~&;~ ,,'-J~~

    ~ ~ ~"-~ \l3'\. ~ < R % ( ( (~ . ISheriff Richard Baua. A~cording to Sheriff Barta. late yesterday after he received a phone from a

    woman identifying herself as Claudine Dombrowski. Sheriff Barta advised me that Claudine

    complained to him at length about your rulings, both in the change of custody hearing and in the

    last hearing. She complained to him of being forced to move from Pawnee Rock and of being

    forced to lose her job. She complained at length about previous domestic violence between

    herself and Mr. Richardson and finally she allegedly informed Sheriff Barta that Mr. Richardsonwas involved drug dealing and use Sheriff Barta claimed to have checked with his narcotics staff

    and that they had no idea who Hal Richardson is The Sheriff somebonr !eam ed....2f.!nyinvolvement in this case and called me. He has absolutel no idea wb this woman is calling him

    ~ informed the Sheriff of Detective etz !fiVOvSIDent in this case up to this ~omt .~9~tit.vJs ?conclusion~ can find ab lut \ nothin at this early sta e afte to indicatethat Mr. Richar son s horne is an;nappropcia1e-placemE;,llt Rikki's teacher reports that she is

    doing fine. I have personally seen the child in her father's home and she looks fine and seems toact normally I have seen her on videotapes with her mother during her mother's parenting time

    and she seems to be fine; yet it is as if you had never made a ruling. Ms. Dombrowski and her

    other seem to be involved in a rather active campaign of evidence gathering,~ardless ofw~~ere is flV e.idence~Mrea. It IS pretty transparently obvious to me that this is ~~~))

    what was beginninito happen at Tecumseh North School until Ms Quail diplomaticany ~~'-JL ~

    suggested that she did not need to be "filled in". Ms. Stumpf s references to the casket are, in my

    opinion. ludicrous. A quick glance at Ms. Stumpf's letter will also show you that numerous

    quotes appear to have been solicited from this child. Considering that Ms. Stumpf resides in

    Texas one cannot help but wonder from whence Wese qugles came. I have some concern that Ms.

    Stumpf's letter has tri8gered a needless open case with SRS Protective Services. Mr. Richardson

    haSTnformed me that he already has reg:iY.eda ph~ call from a Ms.zeysliigar SRS and will be

    having a meeting with her. I have left messages with this person and shehaSiiofcaIIed back. . .Perhaps most disturbing is the discovery of what may be contraband which may have been planted

    on Mr Richardson's vehicle and a subSClWentphone to Sheriff Barta alleging that Mr. Richardsonis involved in drug use and trafficking. I >- ~ \ .' -" " '\> ~ ~ ( ; P'C)C!< ~".

    ,4,l.to! If-RU~ws~bLAwS o~ ~A ftb-t6/()This case seems to defY the laws of gravit>l- 'It is not taking any rational form or shape, but rather

    ~ lis free wheeling out there bouncing hore, there and. everywhere. fersonally I find Ms. $ ~ Do~browski's behavior co~em s of our...l:J:Iltng,)!o~,Ll!!.Il..~~~.are t~ou~a~ no ~

    ~~ partIcular y see It t at way U1a legal sense. I do know that Ms. DombrowsKi's attorney has httle~

    ~ ~ knowledge of these events and certainly cannot be held responsible for them. I have faxed her a ~

    ~~~t number of the documents which I have received from Claudine and her mother, but she seemed ~ i(

    ~ ~, quite unaware ofthe~i ldoubt that she is aw~e of the pJJgne cll!!to Sheriff Barta ,e referral~~Q.tirJ.~SR~ At this po~t, I.would not even consider r recomro .. d an ~rther ~s.!0n .~f " U ~i. M

    VVlsltatlOnbetween Rikki and he:~ If this pattern of ens,s ~reatm~~-"-t!fill . J . - or w tIP rem s resl . ve little ou t that given Ms. Stumpf's attitude 1 q , 9\

    ~4f" J ,\ ~ ~ - Ed't"\' ~""'

  • 8/8/2019 2000 Oct.12- H. Moore to Judge Anderson

    4/4

    r

    this case and particularly toward me and what she perceives as my accountability, I will be .

    reported, complained about or accused ofsomethIDg. ~~ Q.tc:llU ' ''" ' ''"" ~. 4.~t\fc(' ~ til ttl 9~ ~ Wltl

    At present I do not believe that there is .lI. motion befo/e the Court Consequently this memo will ~

    really not solve much of anything unleSs someone. 8.e~~mething before you. I tJiin1(ihat my

    ~' kcapacity as a case manager was long ~gQdistorted q~t of any'-sembIance of'wlfat the statute says a~~ case manager should be. No mattei-what I recommend in this report. it would probably be~~~ ~ objected to within hours. At this point. I simply see myself,E..a repQf!er ef eye:rt&it

    hwhal I

    ~~ope are useful recommendations. ~~ ~ ...oQ>/oo- . ~~. ~::. ~~

    ~~~:rc;1-'v.-~ \ v-l~~\