2000 h 2 16 o
DESCRIPTION
ice. 2000 H 2 16 O. 10 HD 16 O. 10 H 2 18 O. land. Latitude increasing. 1000 H 2 16 O. 3 HD 16 O. 3 H 2 18 O. 1000 H 2 16 O. 2000 H 2 16 O. 7 HD 16 O. 10 HD 16 O. 7 H 2 18 O. 10 H 2 18 O. ice. land. Latitude increasing. 500 H 2 16 O. 1000 H 2 16 O. 1 HD 16 O. 3 HD 16 O. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
2000 H216O 10 HD16O 10 H2
18O
ice
land
Latitude increasing
ice
land1000 H2
16O 7 HD16O 7 H218O
1000 H216O
3 HD16O
3 H218O
2000 H216O 10 HD16O 10 H2
18O
Latitude increasing
500 H216O
1 HD16O
1 H218O
1500 H216O 9 HD16O 9 H2
18O
1000 H216O
3 HD16O
3 H218O
1000 H216O 7 HD16O 7 H2
18O
Latitude increasing
ice
land
300 H216O
0 HD16O
0 H218O
1700 H216O 10 HD16O 10 H2
18O
500 H216O
1 HD16O
1 H218O
1500 H216O 9 HD16O 9 H2
18O
Latitude increasing
ice
land
300 H216O
0 HD16O
0 H218O
1700 H216O 10 HD16O 10 H2
18O
ice
land
Latitude increasing
300 H216O
ice
land
Latitude increasing
1700 H216O 10 HD16O 10 H2
18O
18O of ice decreasing
18O of sea-water increasing
C. Oxygen Isotope stratigraphy
1. The overwhelming conclusion from the studies, which
have been made of both planktic and benthic species, is
that similar isotopic variations are recorded in all areas.
Because of the relatively short mixing time, these nearly
synchronous variations enable correlations to be made
between cores that may be thousands of kilometer apart.
2. Warmer periods (interglacials and interstadials) are
assigned odd numbers (the present interglacial being
number 1) and colder (glacial) periods are assigned even
numbers.
3. The change in benthic 18O commonly recorded between
stage 5e and 5d is so large and so rapid that it is almost
impossible to account for it only in terms of ice-sheet
growth. It seems likely that at least part of this change
reflects a rapid temperature decline (of ≥1.5C) in abyssal
water temperature. Subsequent changes in 18O (in stage
5c to 1) were then primarily the result of changing ice
volume on the continent.
4. It should be emphasized that the isotopic signals in ocean
cores contain both a temperature and an ice-volume
component, which may not be synchronous.
(Shackleton & Opdyke 1976)
(Prell et al. 1986)
D. 18O / Ice volume / Sea-level changes
1. Milankovitch hypotheses(1941)
Glaciations in the past were principally a function of
variations in the Earth’s orbital parameters, and the
resulting redistribution of solar radiation reaching the earth.
An important signal which has been inspected for a
relationship between orbital perturbations and climatic
change is the marine core 18O record, which reflects
changes in continental ice volume (principally Northern
Hemisphere).
(a) Emiliani(1955, 1966)
18O maxima in Caribbean and equatorial Atlantic
cores closely matched summer isolation minima at 65N,
which was the latitude that Milankovitch had considered
critical for the growth of continental ice sheets.
(b) Broecker and Van Donk(1970)
They suggested revisions of Emiliani’s timescale, but still
concluded that insolation changes were a primary factor
in continental glaciation.
(c) Broecker et al. 1968, Mesolella et al. 1969, Veeh &
Chappell 1970
Dates of coral terrace formation, indicative of a former
higher sea level (lower global ice volume), were shown
to be closely related to times of insolation maxima.
(d) Hays et al.(1976)
Three parameters were studied: 18O value in the foram
G.bulloides (an index of global, but primarily Northern
Hemisphere, ice volume); summer sea-surface
temperature (Ts) derived from radiolaria-based transfer
functions (an index of sub-Antarctic temperatures); and
abundance variations of the radiolaria C.davisiana
(an index of Antarctic surface water structure). These
proxy records were concentrated at frequencies
corresponding closely to those expected from an orbital
forcing function(~100kyrs, 40-43kyrs, and 19.5-24kyrs).
2. Chappell & Shackleton(1986)
(a) formal assumption: the deep ocean, at least in the
Pacific, is so cold that its temperature may be regarded
as constant.
(b) V19-30 vs. Huon Pennisula, New Guinea: a discrepancy
has been noted.
(c) the final time-scale of V19-30 is developed by tuning the
initial record on the basis of its relationship to orbital
precession, obliquity and eccentricity functions.
(d) oxygen isotope studies clearly associate reef VIIa (the
older) with substage 5e.
(e) Before 130kyr the sea-level curve derived from marine
terraces is subject to larger uncertainties because both
the assigned ages and assumed uplift rates become
less secure.
(f) Within the past 130kyr the greatest uncertainty relates to
the reef IVb-IIIa area where the isotopic record shows
little structure.
(g) By plotting sea-level against 18O, they found a cluster of
points around zero sea level and +3.4‰ corresponding
to full interglacial stage 1 and substage 5e.
(h) A more probable explanation is that this isotopic shift
results from a temperature effect on the isotopic
composition of the benthic foraminifera analysed.
(i) They conclude that deep waters in the Pacific Ocean
were ~1.5C cooler in glacial and interstadial times than
in the short (~10kyr duration) interglacials of substage 5e
and the present.
3. Mechanisms of glaciation and deglaciation: the oceanic
evidence
Ruddinman and McIntyre(1981):
Ice sheet growth is favored when Northern Hemisphere
summer insolation levels are low (due to orbital factors)
but oceanic temperatures at high latitudes are warm,
providing an abundant moisture source adjacent to the
relatively cool continents. Strong thermal contrasts at the
continental margin help steer depressions towards the
developing ice sheets, thereby increasing the local
accumulation rate.
(a) Heinrich events are attributed to instabilities in the ice
sheets once they have grown to continental dimensions,
resulting in iceberg discharge.
(b) Heinrich events raises global sea level by 10-15m
(c) There must be strong and swift interactions between the
major ice sheets in both hemisphere, in which the
collapse of one ice sheet raises sea level sufficiently to
destabilize those margins of the others where ice
advanced onto the shelves.
4. A longer Perspective: the Entire Brunhes
(a) Oxygen isotope values for interglacial extremes are
then compared with the Stage 1.
(b) The extremes of Stage 1, 5e, 9, 11 are significantly
lighter than Stage 7, 13, 15,17 and 19. During these
interglacials either some northern hemisphere ice must
have remained, or ocean deep water must have been
colder than they are today.
(c) Although the planktonic values are more scattered, the
values for interglacial Stage 7, 13, 15, 17 and 19 are
indeed systematically more positive than the extreme
values for Stages 1, 5, 9, and 11. This in turns suggests
that on slowly uplifting coastlines where should be
marked gap between the Stage 11 and the much older
Stage 23.
(d) Sachs(1973) suggested that this was substantially the
warmest interglacial in the last million years. In DSDP
Site 552A in the North Atlantic, Stage 11 is represented
by the thickest section of nannofossil ooze with the least
ice-rafted contribution of any of the interglacials in the
last 2.5Ma.
(e) Comparing each glacial extreme, without doubt Stages 12
and 16 were more extreme than Stage 2. Stage 6
perhaps marginally more extreme. Stage 10 was perhaps
marginally less extreme than Stage 2. Stages 4, 8, 14,
and 18 were significantly less important.
(f) Amongst the planktonic data sets no consistent pattern
emerges. This is not surprising, since temperature
variations must have played a part for many of the cores.