2 strategic planning - vsl council/improving school... · self-evaluation and review ... improving...

STR

AT

EG

IC P

LAN

NIN

G

STRATEGIC PLANNING

2

IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE

2.0 Introduction

GoalTo provide school councillors with further understandings about:

• working with the school leadership team to develop the key documents in the four year strategic planning cycle

• using data to identify what the school is doing well and what needs to be done to further improve student outcomes

• fulfilling their governance role by ensuring that the school’s planning and practices reflect Departmental guidelines and community expectations.

OverviewOne of the key functions of councils is to contribute to the establishment of the broad vision and direction for the school. Strategic planning is the process of reflecting on past performance, establishing future directions and deciding what will constitute success. In other words, it involves the school community considering these questions:

• where have we been?

• where do we want to go?

• how will we get there?

• how will we know if we have been successful?

The School Accountability and Improvement Framework outlines a clear process for developing the school strategic plan and planning for improving student outcomes.

The process includes:

• evaluating and reviewing of the school's performance against its current school strategic plan

• developing a four-year school strategic plan, which includes statements of the school’s purpose, values and environmental context, and the school's goals, targets and key improvement strategies

• developing annual implementation plans that describe how the key improvement strategies in the school strategic plan will be implemented and monitored

• publishing an annual report for the school community (including parents/guardians, students and other interested people) about the school’s successes and challenges in implementing the strategic plan and improving student outcomes.

The Framework also outlines a process for schools to assess their compliance with legislation and Departmental policies.

The following table provides an overview of how the principal and staff, school council, and the

school community would typically be involved in the strategic planning process. These roles and responsibilities are examined in detail in the three units of the strategic planning module.

The principal … The school council …

Self-evaluation and review

• plans and manages the self-evaluation • reviews the plan and timeline

• organises consultations, gathers and analyses data

• participates in working groups and involves the community in consultations

• drafts the self-evaluation report • endorses the final report

• plans for the school review, briefs the reviewer and provides performance data for the review

• the school council president endorses the terms of reference for negotiated, diagnostic and extended diagnostic reviews

• participates in review panel meetings as required

School strategic plan

• plans and manages the planning process • supports the development of a long term view of the school’s directions

• organises consultations • involves the community in consultations

• prepares a draft plan • endorses the draft plan

• communicates the plan • communicates the plan

• implements the plan • monitors the plan

Implementing, monitoring and reporting on the strategic plan

• develops the annual implementation plan • contributes to developing the annual implementation plan

• endorses the plan

• keeps the school community informed about progress in implementing the plan • monitors progress in implementing the plan

• drafts the annual report • endorses the annual report

• organises a public meeting to present the annual report to the school community

• reports to the community on the school’s performance

2

IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING

2.1 The school self-evaluation and review

3


Why is this topic important?The school self-evaluation is the stage of the accountability and improvement cycle at which the school analyses its performance against what it set out to do in its current school strategic plan, as the first step in developing its next strategic plan. Effective schools continuously and regularly evaluate their performance as a matter of course. The school self-evaluation formalises these on-going activities.

Most importantly, this stage is about enabling the school community to reflect on what the school has achieved and to influence where it is headed for the next four years. The community can do this by contributing to discussion about:

• how well the school is meeting the community’s expectations

• where the school could improve its performance

• what the school’s priorities should be for the next four years.

The self-evaluation leads into a review stage during which a school reviewer from outside the school, working with the Department, looks at the school’s performance and makes recommendations for improvement. Combined, the recommendations from the self-evaluation and school review provide the basis for what will be in the school’s next four-year strategic plan.

On completing this unit, school councillors should be able to:

• understand the evidence related to school performance

• identify how the school community could engage with the self-evaluation process

• consider the school self-evaluation report for endorsement

• understand the school review process and the way the school community could be involved.

4


The principal will … Councillors will typically …

The school community might …

• plan the self-evaluation and timeline (over one school term)

• review the plan and timeline for the self-evaluation

• brief the school and its community about the self-evaluation process

• organise consultations with the council and school community

• participate in working groups

• participate in consultations with the school community

• contribute to surveys

• participate in parent meetings and focus groups

• gather and analyse data

• draft the self-evaluation report

• keep everyone informed about the contents of the report

• support the development of the report

• prepare the final report for council endorsement • endorse the final report

• forward the report to the reviewer and the Department

• receive feedback on the outcomes of the evaluation process via the school newsletter

The following table shows how the principal and staff, school councillors, and the school community (including parents, students and other interested people) would typically be involved in the self-evaluation process. The self-evaluation will usually be completed in term 1 for schools undertaking a review in term 2, and in term 2 for schools undertaking a review in term 3.

5


Establishing evidence of school performanceInformation (evidence) from a range of sources is important in understanding a school’s performance. In the school self-evaluation, school performance is reviewed against the three student outcome areas: student learning, student engagement and wellbeing, and student pathways and transitions.

Student learning outcomesStudent learning outcomes relate to what students know and can do. Schools develop curriculum and report on achievement of student learning outcomes using data relating to:

National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN)

Every year, all students in Years 3, 5, 7 and 9 are assessed using national tests in reading, writing, language conventions (spelling, grammar and punctuation) and numeracy.

Victorian Essential Learning Standards (VELS)

For students in Years prep to 10, the VELS define three strands of student learning:

• Physical, Personal and Social Learning, which includes Health and Physical Education, Interpersonal Development, Personal Learning, and Civics and Citizenship

• Discipline Based Learning, which includes the Arts, English and Languages other than English, the Humanities (Economics, Geography and History), Mathematics and Science

• Interdisciplinary Learning, which includes Communication, Design, Creativity and Technology, Information and Communications Technology, and Thinking.

Towards level 1 of the VELS

This supports the delivery of the VELS and provides a framework for developing effective learning programs and assessing students with disabilities and additional learning needs in Victorian schools who are recognised as working towards level 1 of the VELS.

Student learning outcomes for students supported under the Program for Students with Disabilities (PSD)

Schools with PSD students assess their learning outcomes in relation to student progress in achieving the goals in their individual learning plans.

English and Mathematics online interviews

Along with teachers’ judgements in English, ESL and Mathematics, school achievement in literacy and numeracy outcomes is also measured in the English online interview, the Mathematics online interview and the Fractions and Decimals online interview.

The Victorian Early Years Learning and Development Framework

This builds continuity between the first years of schooling and the learning and development that precede these years. This Framework describes the key learning and development outcomes for children from birth to eight and links to the first stages of the VELS.

Senior secondary certificates and programs

Student learning outcomes in the senior secondary years are defined as attainment in the Victorian Certificate of Education (VCE), the Victorian Certificate of Applied Learning (VCAL) and Vocational Education and Training (VET in schools), including school-based new apprenticeships. Information on this area is provided through school performance data available on the Victorian Assessment Software System and through the VCE data service.

Other information

At the school level, many schools also collect information on student learning using a range of school developed and commercially produced assessment strategies and instruments.

6


Student engagement and wellbeing outcomesStudent engagement and wellbeing outcomes relate to the extent to which students feel safe, secure and stimulated to learn at school.

Measures of student engagement and wellbeing include student attendance, students’ ratings of their connectedness to school, motivation to learn and safety (Student Attitudes to School Survey), teachers' assessments of students’ motivation (Staff Opinion Survey) and parents’ perceptions of the school climate (Parent Opinion Survey). Information collected at the school level can also be used (for example, information about participation in support programs, suspension and expulsion data, and information from the Student Mapping Tool).

The Effective Schools are Engaging Schools - Student Engagement Policy Guidelines provide advice for schools about improving student engagement, attendance and positive behaviours.

7


Student pathways and transitions outcomesStudent pathways and transitions outcomes relate to the quality of student transitions into, through and out of a particular educational context and the extent to which pathways meet the needs of students.

In the compulsory years, key transitions include early childhood services into school, early years to middle years, and primary school to secondary school. Other transitions include students who move between schools, students who move from specialist schools or English language schools into primary or secondary schools, and students with chronic illness requiring long periods of time away from school. Student movements from one year level to the next are also crucial transition points.

To support a positive start to school for all children, a common Victorian approach has been developed to guide families, early childhood services and schools about what is important for children and their families during this time of transition.

The Transition Learning and Development Statement provides schools with important information to assist with planning support and learning programs for children starting school and in transition from primary to secondary school.

In the senior secondary years, this outcome area focuses on retention, the type of studies being undertaken (VCE, VCAL or VET in schools) as well as students’ destinations after leaving school. It also includes the quality of students’ experiences in moving from Year 10 to VCE or other senior secondary options.

The system makes available a number of data sets for senior secondary pathways and transitions (retention, participation and attainment of VCE, VCAL, VET in schools, On Track). The Parent Opinion Survey includes a measure on parent perceptions of the quality of support for student transitions.

At the school level, many schools also collect information on parent and student satisfaction with transitions into, through, and out of the school.

8


Additional outcomes dataOther outcomes data available for children that may be relevant for primary schools include:

• the Australian Early Development Index (AEDI) – This is a population measure that provides information on how children are faring and the success of early childhood services in supporting children and families prior to a child’s entry to school. The AEDI is a summary indicator of children’s progress and how well children are faring relative to others based on areas of early childhood development.

• the Victorian Child and Adolescent Monitoring System (VCAMS) - This reports on the safety, health, learning, development and wellbeing of children and young people in Victoria. This data is reported against the 150 VCAMS indicators and provides a sound basis to support school strategic planning. This data is published in annual reports as well as community level profiles.

9


Data analysisThe principal and leadership team will use the data to:

• examine trends, to see how performance has changed over time

• consider the achievements of specific groups of students to assess their performance

• analyse outcomes for individuals and groups of students as they move from one year level to the next through the school

• evaluate differences in outcomes between different skill areas within English and Mathematics

• make comparisons with state averages or statewide information about schools with similar student backgrounds.

An annual summary of each school’s performance is provided through the Government School Performance Summary and is available online on the Victorian Registration and Qualifications Authority State Register.

This information covers a summary of a school’s performance in student learning and student engagement and wellbeing for primary schools; and for both these areas plus pathways and transitions information for secondary schools. It also provides information about whether a school, taking into account its students, is performing higher than, lower than, or broadly similar to other Victorian schools with a similar student intake. A more detailed School Level Report is made available to the school principal.

The self-evaluation process will contribute to council’s understanding of the school’s performance. This process may include:

• engaging in discussions and presentations about data by the principal

• participating in working groups

• collecting information from areas relevant to the school community.

Multiple sources of information will enable a school to make better decisions about how to improve its performance. It is important not to draw conclusions from one set of data, but to try to use a range of sources to understand the various factors that are contributing to an aspect of the school’s performance.

Understandably, many councillors will not have experience in analysing data. The principal will explain to councillors the relevance of each set of data to school performance and will help councillors make sense of some specialised data, such as NAPLAN results.

The key points to remember with data analysis are that:

• absolute scores are useful for specifying targets and measuring increase or decrease in scores

• relative scores are useful for comparing one school’s performance with schools with students from a similar background.

Councillors also need to be aware of the importance of maintaining confidentiality in respect of the data they may examine during the school self-evaluation process.

10


Engaging the school communityWhen considering how best to consult with its community, a school might consider what form of consultation has worked well before, the resources available to the school for consultation, and the geographic spread and diversity of the community.

Opportunities for face-to-face consultations include:

• inviting the community to participate in forums to discuss the school’s performance and its directions, making interpreters available if necessary

• holding small group discussions with parents/guardians, where performance data is presented and responses sought

• forming working groups to undertake a particular evaluation task.

Other considerationsSmall group discussions might also be an option if the school community is geographically dispersed, or has significant numbers of people who speak languages other than English. In these cases, the principal working with school councillors could:

• convene small group discussions in places, at times and in languages that suit participants

• talk to community organisations (such as cultural groups or local aboriginal education consultative groups in the case of Koorie families).

Other opportunities for consultation include:

• surveys of parents/guardians, asking for comments and opinions

• providing information about the self-evaluation in the school newsletter with an invitation to readers to comment

• suggestion boxes where people can leave their comments.

11


The self-evaluation reportThe principal and leadership team are responsible for drafting a report which draws together the evidence of the school’s performance and feedback from community consultations. The principal will provide a copy of the report to the school council for consideration and endorsement.

The Department publishes guidelines about the self-evaluation process, including a template to help schools prepare their self-evaluation report. The report template requires schools to answer five questions about the three student outcome areas: student learning, student engagement and wellbeing and student pathways and transitions.

The five questions are:

• what student outcomes were we trying to achieve?

• what student outcomes did we achieve?

• why did we achieve/not achieve improved student outcomes?

• how effectively did we manage resources to support the achievement of improved student outcomes?

• what can we do in the future to continue to improve?

Self-evaluation reports should include:

• an executive summary summarising the main elements of the report, the school’s strengths, areas for improvement, how effectively the goals of the last strategic plan were met, and recommendations

• a description of the self-evaluation process

• the school context, including the demographic and social characteristics of the school

• the evaluation of performance in detail for each of the three student outcome areas

• recommendations for improvement.

To provide feedback, councillors should reflect on the adequacy of the process to develop the draft, and particularly ensure that evidence from a wide range of sources has been considered to provide an accurate and agreed picture of the school’s context and performance. They should be satisfied that the process has complied with the Department’s guidelines for undertaking self-evaluations and that the views of the community are reflected in the evaluation report.

12


Endorsing the reportThe principal will present the final report to council for endorsement. Councillors should satisfy themselves that:

• the evaluation provides a valid explanation of the school’s performance

• all relevant facts and opinions were assessed in the process of developing the report

• the conclusions and recommendations flow reasonably and logically from the information and data gathered

• the recommendations appear achievable given the likely resources available.

The amount of time that council spends discussing the report will depend in part on the degree of councillors’ involvement in the self-evaluation process. For example, the council of a small school might have been very hands-on developing the report and councillors would be very familiar with the contents. At a large school, working groups might have developed different sections and the whole report might have been brought together later in the process.

Once the report is endorsed, the principal briefs staff on the report and sends a copy to the regional network leader. The school community may also receive feedback on the important findings in the report through the school newsletter. The report is then used as the source of information for the school review.

Contributing to the school reviewThe school review is intended to provide expert, independent analysis of current school performance and practice, and to make a positive contribution to the school’s efforts to improve student outcomes.

There are four types of school review, of which the first three are undertaken by a school reviewer from outside the school, chosen for their educational expertise and trained in the Department’s policies and guidelines. The types of review are:

• a continuous improvement review, which aims to identify the school’s strengths and opportunities for improvement and is based on a one day panel meeting

• a diagnostic review, which provides detailed analysis of the school’s performance and includes two days of field work at the school and a panel meeting

• an extended diagnostic review, which is similar to the diagnostic review but is broader in reach or analyses performance in greater depth over a longer time. This review provides for four days of field work and a panel meeting.

The fourth type of review is a negotiated review, which focuses on one or more areas where the school requires an independent perspective about how to move to the next level of improvement. The review is supported by a critical friend who provides an external perspective and is selected by the school.

In advance of the negotiated, diagnostic and extended diagnostic reviews, terms of reference are developed to identify the purpose and methodology for the reviews. The terms of reference are endorsed by the principal, school council president and regional network leader.

13


14


The principal will … School councillors will ... The reviewer will ...

• plan and develop a timeline for the review

• help develop the negotiated, diagnostic and extended diagnostic reviews’ terms of reference with the regional network leader

• identify a critical friend for a negotiated review

• endorse the terms of reference

• the school council president endorses the terms of reference

• support the development of the terms of reference by providing advice on the most appropriate methodology

• coordinate the review panel and other review activities, in consultation with the regional network leader and reviewer if applicable

• brief the reviewer

• provide performance data to the reviewer

• visit the school before the review to gain an understanding of the school’s context and brief people on the process and the reviewer’s role

• analyse the school self-evaluation report and other data

• participate in focus groups, interviews etc. as required

• collect further information through focus groups /interviews etc.

The school council president (or their representative) attends the review panel meeting and provides feedback to the council. The following table shows

how councillors, the principal and leadership team and school reviewer would typically be involved in the review process.

15


The principal will … School councillors will ... The reviewer will ...

• participate in review panel meetings and ensure the regional network leader is involved

• participate in review panel meetings

• attend the review panel meeting at the school

• brief the principal, school council president and regional network leader on the progress of the review

• prepare and submit a review report

• set-up review meetings with staff and school council for the reviewer to present review findings

• participate in the reviewer presentation of the review findings at a school council meeting

• present review findings to meetings of staff and school council

• keep staff and council informed of progress

• provide feedback on the draft review report

• discuss the review report at school council

• prepare a response to the review report if considered necessary

• contribute to, and endorse the school’s response to the review report

• provide feedback to the School Improvement Division on the quality of the review process through an online survey

16


Resources and links

Government School Performance Summary Summary of a school’s performance in student learning and student engagement and wellbeing (primary schools) and both these areas plus pathways and transitions (secondary schools)> http://www.vic.gov.au/news-detail/victorian-government-school-performance-summary.html

School Self-Evaluation Guidelines Provide the rationale for preparing a self-evaluation, its context and processes involved in undertaking a self-evaluation> http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/saif2011/sseguidelines4.pdf

Step-by-step Guide to Completing the School Self-Evaluation Report Comprehensive guide to the process, including prompts for questions and suggested data sources> http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/saif2011/ssestepbystep2.pdf

School Self-Evaluation Template A ready-made tool to assist schools prepare their self-evaluation document> http:/ www.education.vic.gov.au/management/schoolimprovement/accountability/evaluation.htm

Summary of information sources that can be used in school self-evaluation and school review Lists sources of information for schools to consider> http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/2010_SSE_Summary_of_Info_

sources.pdf

Information page for school communities A ready-made tool to assist schools inform their school communities about the year of self-evaluation, review and planning> http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/2010_SSE_Info_flyer.pdf

Suggested procedure for school self-evaluation discussions Outlines a possible process to engage the school community> http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/2010_SSE_discussions.pdf

School review DVD and transcript To enable school councillors to gain further insights into the review process> http://www.education.vic.gov.au/management/schoolimprovement/accountability/review.htm

2.2 The school strategic plan

17


Why is this topic important?The school strategic plan is the school’s statement to its community about what it stands for and intends to do over the next four years to improve student outcomes. It defines what the school values most and sets out the school’s goals and targets, key strategies for improvement, and it influences resourcing priorities. It provides an important means for involving the school community in setting the school’s directions.

18



The principal … School councillors …

• briefs the school community about the process of developing the strategic plan

• develop a long term view of the school’s directions

• assist in setting the school’s purpose and values

• reviews the findings and recommendations from the self-evaluation and review process

• reflect on the findings and recommendations from the self-evaluation and review processes to identify priorities for the school

• develops draft goals, targets, key improvement strategies, key actions and milestones

• prepares a draft plan• read and comment on the draft plan

• endorse the plan

• communicates the plan • communicate the plan

• support the development of a long term view of the school’s direction

• help engage the community in the development of the strategic plan

• provide feedback on the draft plan

• consider the plan for endorsement

• help communicate the plan to the community.

The following table shows what councillors, the principal and leadership team are responsible for in the development of the school strategic plan.

19


Developing a long term view of the school’s directionsCouncillors make an important contribution to the strategic planning process through their contribution to determining a long-term view of where the school is headed, and why.

They can do this by:

• reflecting on the findings and recommendations of the school’s self-evaluation and school review

• supporting the identification of environmental factors likely to influence the way the school operates over the next four years such as changing demographics, employment patterns and student and parent expectations

• contributing to the development of the school’s purpose and values. Engaging the

school communityWhen considering how best to consult with its community, a school might consider what form of consultation has worked well before, the resources available to the school for consultation, and the geographic spread and diversity of the community.

Opportunities for face-to-face consultations include forums, small group discussions, working groups and inviting observers to relevant parts of council meetings. Other opportunities for consultation include surveys of parents/guardians, coverage of the planning process in the school newsletter with an invitation to readers to comment, and suggestion boxes. There are more details about these methods of involvement in the school self-evaluation and review unit.

20


Structure of the strategic planThe principal and leadership team will draft the strategic plan.

The Department publishes guidelines about how to prepare the school strategic plan, including a template for the plan. The template has three parts.

Part 1 the school profile covers the school’s:

• purpose, asking ‘What are we here for?' for example, to provide a friendly, caring and dynamic learning environment that engages students who work to achieve their personal best

• values, asking ‘What are our guiding principles and beliefs?' for example, our school demonstrates excellence, integrity, compassion and respect for all

• environmental context, asking ‘What are the factors and risks impacting on our community into the future?' for example, the potential impact of a new housing development within the school’s catchment area.

Part 2 the strategic intent lists goals, targets and key improvement strategies to improve student learning, student engagement and wellbeing and student pathways and transitions.

In terms of the strategic planning process:

• a goal is an aspirational statement that defines what student outcomes the school is trying to achieve

• a target is a measure of success in the achievement of the goal

• an improvement strategy is a high level action that the school will use to achieve its goals and targets.

For example, for student learning:

• a goal: to improve the numeracy of students at all year levels

• a related target: by 2015, the percentage of Year 5 students assessed at or above the national minimum standard in numeracy will increase by 10 per cent, from 80% to 90%

• a key improvement strategy: create a learning environment characterised by high expectations for all.

Part 3 is an indicative planner providing more information about each key improvement strategy, including:

• what actions the school will take in each of the four years (for example, establish learning teams across the school)

• the changes in practice and behaviours the school expects to see if the strategy is successful (for example, by the end of term 2, professional learning teams will meet fortnightly).

21


Endorsing the planSchool council must endorse the final plan as part of its governance responsibilities. To do so, councillors must assure themselves that the plan:

• reflects the community’s values and views about the school’s purpose and direction and that the goals and targets in the plan are consistent with these views

• draws on the findings of the school self-evaluation and review

• provides a concise and clear picture of what the school wants to achieve over the next four years and the broad steps that will be undertaken to achieve this.

If a school’s circumstances change it is possible for the school’s strategic plan to be updated outside of the cycle. Endorsement by the school council and regional network leader is required.

Communicating the planCouncillors support the principal and leadership team in communicating the plan to the school community.

They can do this by:

• drawing on information in the plan when discussing issues with the school community; for example, to answer questions about what the school is doing to improve numeracy levels

• referring to the plan when opportune; for example, in meetings with parents/guardians and at open days

• supporting the principal at formal community reporting meetings; for example, when the annual report is presented to the community

• making reference to the plan when writing reports in school newsletters

• displaying the plan in school reception areas, on notice-boards, in offices, in classrooms and on websites

• encouraging celebration of important achievements, for example, at assemblies, in the newsletter or at a special function.

Resources and links

School Strategic Planning Guidelines To assist school communities to engage in strategic thinking and planning to set the future direction of the school> http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/saif2011/sspgdls2011updated.pdf

School Strategic Plan Template A ready-made tool to assist schools to document their school plan > http://www.education.vic.gov.au/management/schoolimprovement/accountability/strategicplan.htm

Example School Strategic Plan (Primary) A ready-made tool to assist primary schools to document their school plan > http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/saif2011/SSP_Primary_School_

EXAMPLE_2012-2015_v2.pdf

Example School Strategic Plan (Secondary) A ready-made tool to assist secondary schools to document their school plan> http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/saif2011/SSP_Secondary_College_

EXAMPLE_2012-2015_v2.pdf

22


Why is this topic important?The strategic plan establishes the broad direction for the school that is operationalised through the annual implementation plan. The annual implementation plan enables the school to deliver on the goals and targets identified in the school strategic plan.

The school council is required to report annually to their community through the annual report that provides a summary of the school’s performance over the previous year. The reporting process also contributes to system level accountability and to meeting relevant legislative requirements.


• understand the role and purpose of the annual implementation plan

• endorse the annual implementation plan

• monitor progress against the key improvement strategies and achievement milestones

• endorse the annual report.

The following table shows how councillors, the principal and leadership team would typically be involved in developing, monitoring and reporting on the annual implementation plan. As the table shows, the principal and leadership team are responsible for developing the annual implementation plan and for managing, monitoring and reporting activities.

2.3 Implementing, monitoring and reporting

23


The principal will … Councillors will typically …

Annual implementation plan

• develop the annual implementation plan • contribute to the development of the annual implementation plan

• endorse the plan

• keep the school community informed about progress in implementing the plan • monitor progress in implementing the plan

Annual report

• draft the annual report• review and comment on the draft report

• endorse the report

• organise a public meeting to present the annual report to the school community

• ensure that each member of the school community is provided with access to the report

• attend and present to (as appropriate) the public meeting

24


Developing the annual implementation planThe annual implementation plan breaks down each improvement strategy into specific actions. For each action, it specifies:

• how it will be implemented and resourced

• the person or people who will implement the action and report back on progress

• the timeframe for completing the action.

One-year targets are developed as smaller steps towards achieving the broader targets set in the strategic plan. The school then reports to the community on its progress.

The annual implementation plan is operational. It is important for school councillors to be aware of the plan and how it reflects the goals and targets established in the strategic plan and understand their role in overseeing the annual budget and the resourcing of the identified actions.

Endorsing the planThe principal will present the final version of the annual implementation plan to school council for endorsement. Before endorsing it, councillors should satisfy themselves that:

• one-year targets are consistent with the goals and targets in the strategic plan

• the milestones are achievable given the likely available resources.

The plan must be endorsed by the school council and regional network leader by 31 March in the year of implementation.

25


Monitoring progressThe annual implementation plan is the reference point to monitor the school’s performance as it relates to its implementation of the goals, targets and strategies outlined in the strategic plan.

The council’s role should focus on monitoring progress against the key improvement strategies, achievement of the annual milestones and one-year targets featured in the annual implementation plan.

Through this process it may become apparent that the school’s circumstances have changed which may require the school’s strategic plan to be updated outside of the cycle. In this situation any change will require endorsement of the school council and regional network leader.

Structure of the annual reportThe annual report contains:

• cover page

• What Our School Is Doing statement

• Government School Performance Summary

• financial performance and position statement

• National Partnerships annual statement (for participating schools).

26


27


Approving the annual reportThe annual report provides the community with information about the school’s performance in implementing their improvement strategies and how the school’s resources have been used.

Councillors need to be aware that:

• an annual report must be produced each year, including the year in which the school is doing its self-evaluation, review and strategic plan

• the annual report is tabled at a school council meeting for ratification and endorsement and must be forwarded to the regional network leader by 31 March of the next year

• the council must verify that the financial summary and commentary featured in the report are accurate and satisfy government requirements

• the council’s endorsement of the annual report must be recorded in the school council minutes

• school councils are required by law to hold a public meeting each year to present the report

• the school’s annual report must be published on the Victorian Registration and Qualifications Authority’s State Register of Victorian Schools. This process is managed by the Department.

Monitoring compliance requirementsThe school compliance checklist is an online tool that enables schools to self-assess and monitor compliance with all relevant legislation and Departmental requirements. The checklist covers:

• facilities management

• emergency management

• financial management

• governance

• human resource management

• ICT management

• risk management

• student learning

• student engagement and wellbeing

• student pathways and transitions

• Commonwealth requirements.

The school’s designated approver (the principal or a delegated member of staff) completes the checklist online, self-assessing whether the school is fully compliant, partially compliant or non-compliant with relevant checklist items. Where a school has assessed itself as non-compliant or partially compliant, it is expected to be working towards full compliance.

The principal will typically consult council about areas where support is required to ensure compliance.

28


Resources and links

Annual Implementation Planning Guidelines Outline the policy and process for annual implementation planning and how key improvement strategies and other significant projects will be put into operation> http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/saif2011/aipgdls2011updated.pdf

Annual Implementation Plan Templates 2011 A ready-made tool to assist schools to document their annual implementation plan> http://www.education.vic.gov.au/management/schoolimprovement/accountability/implementation.htm

Sample Ultranet Actions and Milestones A resource to support schools implement their key improvement strategies> http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/2010_AIP_Ultranet.pdf

National Partnerships Annual Implementation Plan Appendix (National Partnership schools only) A template to assist schools to document particular programs they are engaged in as part of the National Partnership initiative> http://www.education.vic.gov.au/management/schoolimprovement/accountability/implementation.htm

Annual Implementation Plan Example 1 and 4 Year Targets and Key Improvement Strategies> http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/saif2011/aipexampletargets.pdf

Guidelines for the Annual Report to the School Community Provide the means for the school to reflect on and communicate to the whole school community the successes of their improvement strategies, the effectiveness of resource allocation and their future directions> http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/saif2011/arguidelines3.pdf> http:// www.education.vic.gov.au/management/schoolimprovement/accountability/report.htm

Handout A1Sample School Level Report and Government School Performance Summary

2010 School Level ReportNameless P-12 College (9999)

Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD

Please check the data in this report. If, after comparing it with your own records, youdeem it to be incorrect or incomplete, follow the directions on the following website:

- http://www.education.vic.gov.au/management/schoolimprovement/performancedatathen select 'School Performance Reports'.

Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD

29


Contents

Page No.

Privacy 3

SFO Density and LBOTE 4

English Online Interview - Reading 5- Writing 6- Speaking and Listening 7

Assessment of Reading Prep to Year 2 8-9

Teacher Judgments against the VELS 10-27

ESL Companion Guide 28

NAPLAN - Reading 29-30- Writing 31-32- Numeracy 33-34

AIM - Reading 35-36- Mathematics 37-38

VCE 39-42

VET 43

VCAL 44

Teacher Assessment of Student Progress (PSD students) 45-46

Enrolment 47

Student Retention - Apparent 48- Real 49

Exit Destination 50-53

Student Absence 54

Opinion Surveys - Parent 55- Staff 56

Performance & Development Culture 57

Staff Sick Leave 58

Bank Balances 59

Produced by Data, Outcomesand Evaluation Division, DEECD Page 2 of 59

30


It is important to note that information that identifies an individual or can be used with other readily available information to identify a person is now protected by the InformationPrivacy Act 2000 (http://www.education.vic.gov.au/about/deptpolicies/informationprivacy.htm ).

Where the School Level Report is provided to school council members as part of any annual reporting process, or used for discussion on a school’s performance, such as in consultation with the school community in the school self-evaluation process, it is important to remind school community members of their duty to only use this information for the purpose it was provided, and that the material must be kept confidential.

Privacy

When reporting on the school's performance to the school community, care must be taken to avoid the disclosure of information that can directly or indirectly identify an individual. This may be a particular issue when reporting on the achievement of specific cohorts of students or the opinions of staff where there are small numbers.

In situations where privacy cannot be assured, schools may wish to report on the mean result or provide a written comment on school, year level or cohort performance.


31


SFO Density and LBOTESchool no: 9999School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeExplanation: This page contains the school's SFO (Student Family Occupation) density^, LBOTE (Language Back-

ground Other Than English) proportion* and Stability rate† (a measure of student population stability).

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010SFO density^: 0.66 0.48 0.55 0.54 0.52 0.49 0.46

LBOTE proportion*: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02

Stability rate†: 81.6%

School's 2010 SFO density and LBOTE proportion against that of all other government schools

School's SFO^ percentile range^^ over time

School stability rate as percentile

Notes: ^ The higher the SFO density, the lower the SFO percentile and the lower the socio-economic status (SES).^^ The school's SFO percentile range shows this school's SFO percentile +/- 10%.* From 2007, a student is LBOTE if either the student or one parent/guardian speaks a language other than English at home.

Prior to 2007, a student is LBOTE if the student or one of the parents was born in a non-English speaking country.† NAPLAN matched-cohort data is used to calculate the stability rate. Using 2010 stability as an example, the formula is:

no. of unique students at both yr3 (2008) and yr5 (2010) + no. of unique students at both yr7 (2008) and yr9 (2010)sum of unique students at yr3 (2008) and yr5 (2010) + sum of unique students at yr7 (2008) and yr9 (2010)

Nameless P-12 College

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1

SFO

den

sity

LBOTE proportion

0 20 40 60 80 100

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Who

le S

choo

l

percentileSFO ̂percentile range^^0 20 40 60 80 100

2010

percentileSchool stability as percentile


32


Engl

ish

Onl

ine

Inte

rvie

w (E

OI):

Rea

ding

Tabl

e 1:

Def

initi

on o

f EO

I gro

ups

Scho

ol n

o:Sc

hool

nam

e:N

amel

ess

P-12

Col

lege

Sour

ce o

f dat

a:En

glis

h O

nlin

e In

terv

iew

app

licat

ion.

Expl

anat

ion:

The

Engl

ish

Onl

ine

Inte

rvie

w is

an

asse

ssm

ent p

rogr

am th

at ta

kes

the

form

of a

n in

terv

iew

bet

wee

n a

teac

her a

nd a

stu

dent

, with

resp

onse

s be

ing

9999

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

0(b

ttf

l)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

btt

fl

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8th

bl

td

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4th

bl

td

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI

1

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 5

of 5

9

,p

gre

cord

ed b

y th

e te

ache

r in

an o

nlin

e sy

stem

. It

was

use

d fo

r ass

essm

ent o

fPr

ep-Y

ear 2

stu

dent

s in

Vic

toria

n go

vern

men

t sch

ools

from

Oct

ober

200

9*.

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

End

Prep

End

Year

1En

d Ye

ar 2

parti

cipa

tion

parti

cipa

tion

parti

cipa

tion

parti

cipa

tion

(n)

(%)†

12

34

56

Scho

olSt

ate

(n)

(%)†

12

34

56

Scho

olSt

ate

(n)

(%)†

12

34

56

Scho

olSt

ate

(n)

(%)†

12

34

56

Scho

olSt

ate

2009

2310

04

1322

2235

41

311

2322

100

05

523

2345

240

177

1810

00

017

2833

222

642

24

stud

ent

stud

ent

Mea

n VE

LS

Scor

eM

ean

VELS

Sc

ore

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

sby

EO

I gro

upPe

rcen

t of s

tude

nts

by E

OI g

roup

stud

ent

Mea

n VE

LS

Scor

ePe

rcen

t of s

tude

nts

by E

OI g

roup

stud

ent

Mea

n VE

LS

Scor

ePe

rcen

t of s

tude

nts

by E

OI g

roup

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

sco

re =

0 (b

otto

mof

sca

le)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

botto

m o

f sca

le

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI g

roup

1:

2009

2310

04

1322

2235

41.

311.

2322

100

05

523

2345

2.40

1.77

1810

00

017

2833

222.

642.

2420

1029

100

041

550

03

0.6

0.4

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

by

EOI g

roup

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

aga

inst

B

egin

ning

Pre

p E

nd P

rep

End

Year

1En

d Ye

ar 2

Ung

rade

dSF

O p

erce

ntile

rang

e**

p

100

100

100

100

2009

2010

100

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

sco

re =

0 (b

otto

mof

sca

le)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

botto

m o

f sca

le

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI g

roup

1:

Not

e: In

201

0, o

nly

the

Begi

nnin

g Pr

ep a

sses

smen

t had

take

n pl

ace.

Beginning Prep

020406080100

percent

406080100

ercent

020406080100

percent

020406080100

percent

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e406080100

percent

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

sco

re =

0 (b

otto

mof

sca

le)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

botto

m o

f sca

le

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI g

roup

1:

Not

e: In

201

0, o

nly

the

Begi

nnin

g Pr

ep a

sses

smen

t had

take

n pl

ace.

Ung

rade

dst

uden

tpar

ticip

atio

n(n

)

End Prep

-100-8

0

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

020406080100

2009

2010

percent

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

sco

re =

0 (b

otto

mof

sca

le)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

botto

m o

f sca

le

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI g

roup

1:

Not

e: In

201

0, o

nly

the

Begi

nnin

g Pr

ep a

sses

smen

t had

take

n pl

ace.

Ung

rade

dst

uden

tpar

ticip

atio

n(n

)=

0

Scho

ol M

ean

agai

nst S

tate

Mea

n

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

End

Pre

pEn

d Ye

ar 1

End

Year

2 U

ngra

ded*

*

d Year 1

-100-8

0

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

100

3.5

4.0

.

100

3.5

4.0

.

100

3.5

4.0

.

100

3.5

4.0

.

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

2009

2010

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

%EO

I gro

up 1

^%

EOI g

roup

2^

%EO

I gro

up 3

^%

EOI g

roup

4%

EOI g

roup

5%

EOI g

roup

6

020406080100

2009

2010

percent 3.5

4.0

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

sco

re =

0 (b

otto

mof

sca

le)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

botto

m o

f sca

le

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI g

roup

1:

Not

e: In

201

0, o

nly

the

Begi

nnin

g Pr

ep a

sses

smen

t had

take

n pl

ace.

End ar 2

-100-8

0

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

255075100

05

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

ercent student participation .

mean VELS score

255075100

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

percent student participation .

mean VELS score

255075100

05

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0


mean VELS score

255075100

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0


mean VELS score

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

2009

2010

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

%EO

I gro

up 1

^%

EOI g

roup

2^

%EO

I gro

up 3

^%

EOI g

roup

4%

EOI g

roup

5%

EOI g

roup

6

020406080100

2009

2010

percent 05

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

mean VELS score

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

sco

re =

0 (b

otto

mof

sca

le)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

botto

m o

f sca

le

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI g

roup

1:

Not

e: In

201

0, o

nly

the

Begi

nnin

g Pr

ep a

sses

smen

t had

take

n pl

ace.

Not

e:*

In 2

010,

onl

y th

e Be

ginn

ing

Prep

ass

essm

ent h

ad ta

ken

plac

e.†

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= (s

tude

nts

who

parti

cipa

ted

/ Feb

ruar

y or

Aug

ust c

ensu

s en

rolm

ents

) * 1

00.

**P

tild

tt

tli

blf

thd

dh

t

End Yea

-100-8

0

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

0255075100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010


mean VELS score

0255075100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010


mean VELS score

0255075100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010


mean VELS score

Stat

e M

ean

Scor

eSt

uden

t Par

ticip

atio

n†

0255075100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010


mean VELS score

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

SFO

Per

cent

ile ra

nge

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

%EO

I gro

up 1

^%

EOI g

roup

2^

%EO

I gro

up 3

^%

EOI g

roup

4%

EOI g

roup

5%

EOI g

roup

6

020406080100

2009

2010

percent 0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010

mean VELS score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

e

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

sco

re =

0 (b

otto

mof

sca

le)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

botto

m o

f sca

le

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI g

roup

1:

Not

e: In

201

0, o

nly

the

Begi

nnin

g Pr

ep a

sses

smen

t had

take

n pl

ace.

** P

erce

ntile

s an

d st

ate

mea

ns a

re n

ot a

pplic

able

for t

he u

ngra

ded

coho

rt.^

EO

I gro

up d

efin

ition

s va

ry b

y ye

ar le

vel.

Ref

er to

Tab

le 1

abo

ve fo

r EO

I gro

up d

efin

ition

s.

-100-8

0

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

0255075100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010


mean VELS score

0255075100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010


mean VELS score

0255075100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010


mean VELS score

Stat

e M

ean

Scor

eSt

uden

t Par

ticip

atio

n†

0255075100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010


mean VELS score

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

SFO

Per

cent

ile ra

nge

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

%EO

I gro

up 1

^%

EOI g

roup

2^

%EO

I gro

up 3

^%

EOI g

roup

4%

EOI g

roup

5%

EOI g

roup

6

020406080100

2009

2010

percent 0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010

mean VELS score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

e

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

sco

re =

0 (b

otto

mof

sca

le)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

botto

m o

f sca

le

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI g

roup

1:

Not

e: In

201

0, o

nly

the

Begi

nnin

g Pr

ep a

sses

smen

t had

take

n pl

ace.

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 5

of 5

9

33


Engl

ish

Onl

ine

Inte

rvie

w (E

OI):

Writ

ing

Tabl

e 1:

Def

initi

on o

f EO

I gro

ups

Scho

ol n

o:Sc

hool

nam

e:N

amel

ess

P-12

Col

lege

Sour

ce o

f dat

a:En

glis

h O

nlin

e In

terv

iew

app

licat

ion.

Expl

anat

ion:

The

Engl

ish

Onl

ine

Inte

rvie

w is

an

asse

ssm

ent p

rogr

am th

at ta

kes

the

form

of a

n in

terv

iew

bet

wee

n a

teac

her a

nd a

stu

dent

, with

resp

onse

s be

ing

9999

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

0(b

ttf

l)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

btt

fl

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8th

bl

td

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4th

bl

td

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI

1

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 6

of 5

9

,p

gre

cord

ed b

y th

e te

ache

r in

an o

nlin

e sy

stem

. It

was

use

d fo

r ass

essm

ent o

fPr

ep-Y

ear 2

stu

dent

s in

Vic

toria

n go

vern

men

t sch

ools

from

Oct

ober

200

9*.

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

End

Prep

End

Year

1En

d Ye

ar 2

parti

cipa

tion

parti

cipa

tion

parti

cipa

tion

parti

cipa

tion

(n)

(%)†

12

34

56

Scho

olSt

ate

(n)

(%)†

12

34

56

Scho

olSt

ate

(n)

(%)†

12

34

56

Scho

olSt

ate

(n)

(%)†

12

34

56

Scho

olSt

ate

2009

2310

017

013

229

391

591

3622

100

50

2714

550

233

178

1810

00

06

4417

332

792

36

stud

ent

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

sM

ean

VELS

Sc

ore

stud

ent

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

sM

ean

VELS

Sc

ore

stud

ent

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

sPe

rcen

t of s

tude

nts

Mea

n VE

LS

Scor

eby

EO

I gro

upby

EO

I gro

upby

EO

I gro

upby

EO

I gro

upM

ean

VELS

Sc

ore

stud

ent

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

sco

re =

0 (b

otto

mof

sca

le)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

botto

m o

f sca

le

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI g

roup

1:

2009

2310

017

013

229

391.

591.

3622

100

50

2714

550

2.33

1.78

1810

00

06

4417

332.

792.

3620

1029

100

5938

30

00

0.1

0.1

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

by

EOI g

roup

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

aga

inst

B

egin

ning

Pre

p E

nd P

rep

End

Year

1En

d Ye

ar 2

Ung

rade

dSF

O p

erce

ntile

rang

e**

p

100

100

100

100

2009

2010

100

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

sco

re =

0 (b

otto

mof

sca

le)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

botto

m o

f sca

le

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI g

roup

1:

Not

e: In

201

0, o

nly

the

Begi

nnin

g Pr

ep a

sses

smen

t had

take

n pl

ace.

Beginning Prep

020406080100

percent

406080100

ercent

020406080100

percent

020406080100

percent

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e406080100

percent

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

sco

re =

0 (b

otto

mof

sca

le)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

botto

m o

f sca

le

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI g

roup

1:

Not

e: In

201

0, o

nly

the

Begi

nnin

g Pr

ep a

sses

smen

t had

take

n pl

ace.

Ung

rade

dst

uden

tpar

ticip

atio

n(n

)

End Prep

-100-8

0

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

020406080100

2009

2010

percent

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

sco

re =

0 (b

otto

mof

sca

le)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

botto

m o

f sca

le

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI g

roup

1:

Not

e: In

201

0, o

nly

the

Begi

nnin

g Pr

ep a

sses

smen

t had

take

n pl

ace.

Ung

rade

dst

uden

tpar

ticip

atio

n(n

)=

0

Scho

ol M

ean

agai

nst S

tate

Mea

n

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

End

Pre

pEn

d Ye

ar 1

End

Year

2 U

ngra

ded*

*

d Year 1

-100-8

0

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

100

3.5

4.0

.

100

3.5

4.0

.10

0

3.5

4.0

.

100

3.5

4.0

.

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

2009

2010

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

%EO

I gro

up 1

^%

EOI g

roup

2^

%EO

I gro

up 3

^%

EOI g

roup

4%

EOI g

roup

5%

EOI g

roup

6

020406080100

2009

2010

percent 3.5

4.0

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

sco

re =

0 (b

otto

mof

sca

le)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

botto

m o

f sca

le

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI g

roup

1:

Not

e: In

201

0, o

nly

the

Begi

nnin

g Pr

ep a

sses

smen

t had

take

n pl

ace.

End ar 2

-100-8

0

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

255075100

05

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0


mean VELS score

255075100

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0


mean VELS score

255075100

05

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0


mean VELS score

255075100

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0


mean VELS score

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

2009

2010

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

%EO

I gro

up 1

^%

EOI g

roup

2^

%EO

I gro

up 3

^%

EOI g

roup

4%

EOI g

roup

5%

EOI g

roup

6

020406080100

2009

2010

percent 05

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

mean VELS score

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

sco

re =

0 (b

otto

mof

sca

le)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

botto

m o

f sca

le

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI g

roup

1:

Not

e: In

201

0, o

nly

the

Begi

nnin

g Pr

ep a

sses

smen

t had

take

n pl

ace.

Not

e:*

In 2

010,

onl

y th

e Be

ginn

ing

Prep

ass

essm

ent h

ad ta

ken

plac

e.†

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= (s

tude

nts

who

parti

cipa

ted

/ Feb

ruar

y or

Aug

ust c

ensu

s en

rolm

ents

) * 1

00.

**P

tild

tt

tli

blf

thd

dh

t

End Yea

-100-8

0

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

0255075100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010


mean VELS score

0255075100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010


mean VELS score

0255075100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010


mean VELS score

Stat

e M

ean

Scor

eSt

uden

t Par

ticip

atio

n†

0255075100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010


mean VELS score

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

SFO

Per

cent

ile ra

nge

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

%EO

I gro

up 1

^%

EOI g

roup

2^

%EO

I gro

up 3

^%

EOI g

roup

4%

EOI g

roup

5%

EOI g

roup

6

020406080100

2009

2010

percent 0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010

mean VELS score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

e

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

sco

re =

0 (b

otto

mof

sca

le)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

botto

m o

f sca

le

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI g

roup

1:

Not

e: In

201

0, o

nly

the

Begi

nnin

g Pr

ep a

sses

smen

t had

take

n pl

ace.

** P

erce

ntile

s an

d st

ate

mea

ns a

re n

ot a

pplic

able

for t

he u

ngra

ded

coho

rt.^

EO

I gro

up d

efin

ition

s va

ry b

y ye

ar le

vel.

Ref

er to

Tab

le 1

abo

ve fo

r EO

I gro

up d

efin

ition

s.

-100-8

0

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

0255075100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010


mean VELS score

0255075100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010


mean VELS score

0255075100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010


mean VELS score

Stat

e M

ean

Scor

eSt

uden

t Par

ticip

atio

n†

0255075100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010


mean VELS score

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

SFO

Per

cent

ile ra

nge

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

%EO

I gro

up 1

^%

EOI g

roup

2^

%EO

I gro

up 3

^%

EOI g

roup

4%

EOI g

roup

5%

EOI g

roup

6

020406080100

2009

2010

percent 0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010

mean VELS score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

e

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

sco

re =

0 (b

otto

mof

sca

le)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

botto

m o

f sca

le

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI g

roup

1:

Not

e: In

201

0, o

nly

the

Begi

nnin

g Pr

ep a

sses

smen

t had

take

n pl

ace.

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 6

of 5

9

34


Engl

ish

Onl

ine

Inte

rvie

w (E

OI):

Spe

akin

g &

Lis

teni

ngTa

ble

1: D

efin

ition

of E

OI g

roup

sSc

hool

no:

Scho

ol n

ame:

Nam

eles

s P-

12 C

olle

geSo

urce

of d

ata:

Engl

ish

Onl

ine

Inte

rvie

w a

pplic

atio

n.Ex

plan

atio

n:Th

e En

glis

h O

nlin

e In

terv

iew

is a

n as

sess

men

t pro

gram

that

take

sth

e fo

rm o

f an

inte

rvie

w b

etw

een

a te

ache

r and

a s

tude

nt, w

ith re

spon

ses

bein

g

9999

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

0(b

ttf

l)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

btt

fl

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8th

bl

td

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4th

bl

td

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI

1

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 7

of 5

9

,p

gre

cord

ed b

y th

e te

ache

r in

an o

nlin

e sy

stem

. It

was

use

d fo

r ass

essm

ent o

fPr

ep-Y

ear 2

stu

dent

s in

Vic

toria

n go

vern

men

t sch

ools

from

Oct

ober

200

9*.

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

End

Prep

End

Year

1En

d Ye

ar 2

parti

cipa

tion

parti

cipa

tion

parti

cipa

tion

parti

cipa

tion

(n)

(%)†

12

34

56

Scho

olSt

ate

(n)

(%)†

12

34

56

Scho

olSt

ate

(n)

(%)†

12

34

56

Scho

olSt

ate

(n)

(%)†

12

34

56

Scho

olSt

ate

2009

2310

04

035

174

391

601

3022

100

05

99

1859

267

187

1810

00

011

2222

442

852

29

stud

ent

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

sM

ean

VELS

Sc

ore

stud

ent

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

sM

ean

VELS

Sc

ore

stud

ent

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

sPe

rcen

t of s

tude

nts

Mea

n VE

LS

Scor

eby

EO

I gro

upby

EO

I gro

upby

EO

I gro

upby

EO

I gro

upM

ean

VELS

Sc

ore

stud

ent

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

sco

re =

0 (b

otto

mof

sca

le)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

botto

m o

f sca

le

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI g

roup

1:

2009

2310

04

035

174

391.

601.

3022

100

05

99

1859

2.67

1.87

1810

00

011

2222

442.

852.

2920

1029

100

031

553

37

0.8

0.4

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

by

EOI g

roup

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

aga

inst

B

egin

ning

Pre

p E

nd P

rep

End

Year

1En

d Ye

ar 2

Ung

rade

dSF

O p

erce

ntile

rang

e**

p

100

100

100

100

2009

2010

100

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

sco

re =

0 (b

otto

mof

sca

le)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

botto

m o

f sca

le

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI g

roup

1:

Not

e: In

201

0, o

nly

the

Begi

nnin

g Pr

ep a

sses

smen

t had

take

n pl

ace.

Beginning Prep

020406080100

percent

406080100

ercent

020406080100

percent

020406080100

percent

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e406080100

percent

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

sco

re =

0 (b

otto

mof

sca

le)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

botto

m o

f sca

le

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI g

roup

1:

Not

e: In

201

0, o

nly

the

Begi

nnin

g Pr

ep a

sses

smen

t had

take

n pl

ace.

Ung

rade

dst

uden

tpar

ticip

atio

n(n

)

End Prep

-100-8

0

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

020406080100

2009

2010

percent

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

sco

re =

0 (b

otto

mof

sca

le)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

botto

m o

f sca

le

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI g

roup

1:

Not

e: In

201

0, o

nly

the

Begi

nnin

g Pr

ep a

sses

smen

t had

take

n pl

ace.

Ung

rade

dst

uden

tpar

ticip

atio

n(n

)=

0

Scho

ol M

ean

agai

nst S

tate

Mea

n

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

End

Pre

pEn

d Ye

ar 1

End

Year

2 U

ngra

ded*

*

d Year 1

-100-8

0

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

100

3.5

4.0

.

100

3.5

4.0

.

100

3.5

4.0

.

100

3.5

4.0

.

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

2009

2010

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

%EO

I gro

up 1

^%

EOI g

roup

2^

%EO

I gro

up 3

^%

EOI g

roup

4%

EOI g

roup

5%

EOI g

roup

6

020406080100

2009

2010

percent 3.5

4.0

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

sco

re =

0 (b

otto

mof

sca

le)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

botto

m o

f sca

le

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI g

roup

1:

Not

e: In

201

0, o

nly

the

Begi

nnin

g Pr

ep a

sses

smen

t had

take

n pl

ace.

End ar 2

-100-8

0

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

255075100

05

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0


mean VELS score

255075100

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0


mean VELS score

255075100

05

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0


mean VELS score

255075100

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0


mean VELS score

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

2009

2010

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

%EO

I gro

up 1

^%

EOI g

roup

2^

%EO

I gro

up 3

^%

EOI g

roup

4%

EOI g

roup

5%

EOI g

roup

6

020406080100

2009

2010

percent 05

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

mean VELS score

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

sco

re =

0 (b

otto

mof

sca

le)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

botto

m o

f sca

le

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI g

roup

1:

Not

e: In

201

0, o

nly

the

Begi

nnin

g Pr

ep a

sses

smen

t had

take

n pl

ace.

Not

e:*

In 2

010,

onl

y th

e Be

ginn

ing

Prep

ass

essm

ent h

ad ta

ken

plac

e.†

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= (s

tude

nts

who

parti

cipa

ted

/ Feb

ruar

y or

Aug

ust c

ensu

s en

rolm

ents

) * 1

00.

**P

tild

tt

tli

blf

thd

dh

t

End Yea

-100-8

0

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

0255075100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010


mean VELS score

0255075100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010


mean VELS score

0255075100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010


mean VELS score

Stat

e M

ean

Scor

eSt

uden

t Par

ticip

atio

n†

0255075100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010


mean VELS score

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

SFO

Per

cent

ile ra

nge

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

%EO

I gro

up 1

^%

EOI g

roup

2^

%EO

I gro

up 3

^%

EOI g

roup

4%

EOI g

roup

5%

EOI g

roup

6

020406080100

2009

2010

percent 0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010

mean VELS score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

e

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

sco

re =

0 (b

otto

mof

sca

le)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

botto

m o

f sca

le

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI g

roup

1:

Not

e: In

201

0, o

nly

the

Begi

nnin

g Pr

ep a

sses

smen

t had

take

n pl

ace.

** P

erce

ntile

s an

d st

ate

mea

ns a

re n

ot a

pplic

able

for t

he u

ngra

ded

coho

rt.^

EO

I gro

up d

efin

ition

s va

ry b

y ye

ar le

vel.

Ref

er to

Tab

le 1

abo

ve fo

r EO

I gro

up d

efin

ition

s.

-100-8

0

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2009

2010

percent

0255075100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010


mean VELS score

0255075100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010


mean VELS score

0255075100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010


mean VELS score

Stat

e M

ean

Scor

eSt

uden

t Par

ticip

atio

n†

0255075100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010


mean VELS score

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

SFO

Per

cent

ile ra

nge

020

4060

8010

0

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

%EO

I gro

up 1

^%

EOI g

roup

2^

%EO

I gro

up 3

^%

EOI g

roup

4%

EOI g

roup

5%

EOI g

roup

6

020406080100

2009

2010

percent 0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009

2010

mean VELS score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

e

Beg

inni

ng P

rep

/ Ung

rade

dVE

LS s

core

>=

2.1

VELS

sco

re =

1.6

to 2

.0VE

LS s

core

= 1

.1 to

1.5

VELS

sco

re =

0.6

to 1

.0VE

LS s

core

= 0

.1 to

0.5

VELS

sco

re =

0 (b

otto

mof

sca

le)

End

Prep

>24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edup

to 1

2 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 6

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed6-

12 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

botto

m o

f sca

le

End

Year

1>2

4 m

ths

abov

e ex

pect

ed12

-24

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

at o

r up

to 1

2 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

12-1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>1

8 m

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed

End

Year

2>2

4 m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

12-2

4m

onth

s ab

ove

expe

cted

up to

12

mon

ths

abov

e ex

pect

edat

or u

p to

12

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed12

-24

mon

ths

belo

w ex

pect

ed>2

4 m

onth

s be

low

expe

cted

EOI g

roup

6:

EOI g

roup

5:

EOI g

roup

4:

EOI g

roup

3:

EOI g

roup

2:

EOI g

roup

1:

Not

e: In

201

0, o

nly

the

Begi

nnin

g Pr

ep a

sses

smen

t had

take

n pl

ace.

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 7

of 5

9

35


Ass

essm

ent o

f Rea

ding

: Pre

p to

Yea

r 2 (d

isco

ntin

ued

at th

e en

d of

200

8)Sc

hool

no:

Scho

ol n

ame:

Nam

eles

s P-

12 C

olle

geEx

plan

atio

n:St

uden

ts' a

bilit

y to

read

uns

ight

ed te

xt is

ass

esse

d at

the

end

of e

ach

year

. Th

e da

ta p

rese

nted

her

e in

clud

es 'd

eem

ed n

ot c

apab

le' s

tude

nts.

Mor

e de

taile

d in

form

atio

n (in

clud

ing

data

whe

re d

eem

ed n

ot c

apab

le s

tude

nts

are

excl

uded

) is

avai

labl

e in

the

Asse

ssm

ent o

f Rea

ding

repo

rt, a

vaila

ble

from

the

Scho

ol P

erfo

rman

ce R

epor

ts w

ebsi

te.

Sour

ce o

f dat

a:D

ata

trans

mitt

ed fr

om s

choo

l to

DEE

CD

via

an

onlin

e w

eb-fo

rm.

Stat

eSt

ate

Stat

e20

0820

0820

08(N

o.)

%(N

o.)

%(N

o.)

%(N

o.)

%(N

o.)

%%

(No.

)%

(No.

)%

(No.

)%

(No.

)%

(No.

)%

%(N

o.)

%(N

o.)

%(N

o.)

%(N

o.)

%(N

o.)

%%

100%

(23)

76.7

(20)

100.

0(2

1)10

0.0

(20)

90.9

(19)

90.5

69.0

(16)

100.

0(2

9)10

0.0

(20)

100.

0(1

8)10

0.0

(23)

100.

094

.790

-99%

(6)

20.0

(1)

4.5

(1)

4.8

25.4

4.7

80-8

9%(1

)3.

32.

30.

251

-79%

(1)

4.8

1.5

0.2

50%

or b

elow

(1)

4.5

1.7

0.3

Tota

l(3

0)10

0.0

(20)

100.

0(2

1)10

0.0

(22)

100.

0(2

1)10

0.0

100.

0(1

6)10

0.0

(29)

100.

0(2

0)10

0.0

(18)

100.

0(2

3)10

0.0

100.

0Su

btot

al 9

0-10

0%(2

9)96

.7(2

0)10

0.0

(21)

100.

0(2

1)95

.5(2

0)95

.294

.5(1

6)10

0.0

(29)

100.

0(2

0)10

0.0

(18)

100.

0(2

3)10

0.0

99.4

100%

(17)

56.7

(14)

70.0

(19)

90.5

(13)

59.1

(16)

76.2

45.3

(12)

75.0

(29)

100.

0(2

0)10

0.0

(18)

100.

0(2

3)10

0.0

81.0

(22)

100.

0(1

8)10

0.0

(30)

96.8

(18)

94.7

(18)

100.

090

.490

-99%

(11)

36.7

(5)

25.0

(2)

9.5

(8)

36.4

(3)

14.3

36.1

(4)

25.0

16.9

(1)

3.2

(1)

5.3

8.8

80-8

9%(1

)5.

0(1

)4.

85.

20.

80.

351

-79%

(2)

6.7

3.6

0.4

0.1

50%

or b

elow

(1)

4.5

(1)

4.8

9.8

1.0

0.4

Tota

l(3

0)10

0.0

(20)

100.

0(2

1)10

0.0

(22)

100.

0(2

1)10

0.0

100.

0(1

6)10

0.0

(29)

100.

0(2

0)10

0.0

(18)

100.

0(2

3)10

0.0

100.

0(2

2)10

0.0

(18)

100.

0(3

1)10

0.0

(19)

100.

0(1

8)10

0.0

100.

0Su

btot

al 9

0-10

0%(2

8)93

.3(1

9)95

.0(2

1)10

0.0

(21)

95.5

(19)

90.5

81.3

(16)

100.

0(2

9)10

0.0

(20)

100.

0(1

8)10

0.0

(23)

100.

097

.9(2

2)10

0.0

(18)

100.

0(3

1)10

0.0

(19)

100.

0(1

8)10

0.0

99.2

100%

(2)

12.5

(11)

37.9

(17)

85.0

(4)

22.2

(8)

34.8

37.1

(15)

68.2

(10)

55.6

(28)

90.3

(11)

57.9

(14)

77.8

62.9

90-9

9%(1

0)62

.5(1

8)62

.1(2

)10

.0(1

4)77

.8(1

5)65

.249

.2(7

)31

.8(8

)44

.4(1

)3.

2(7

)36

.8(4

)22

.233

.280

-89%

(2)

12.5

6.3

(2)

6.5

(1)

5.3

1.8

51-7

9%(2

)12

.5(1

)5.

03.

00.

850

% o

r bel

ow4.

31.

4To

tal

(16)

100.

0(2

9)10

0.0

(20)

100.

0(1

8)10

0.0

(23)

100.

010

0.0

(22)

100.

0(1

8)10

0.0

(31)

100.

0(1

9)10

0.0

(18)

100.

010

0.0

Subt

otal

90-

100%

(12)

75.0

(29)

100.

0(1

9)95

.0(1

8)10

0.0

(23)

100.

086

.4(2

2)10

0.0

(18)

100.

0(2

9)93

.5(1

8)94

.7(1

8)10

0.0

96.1

100%

(10)

45.5

(9)

50.0

(25)

80.6

(7)

36.8

(16)

88.9

47.4

90-9

9%(1

2)54

.5(9

)50

.0(4

)12

.9(1

1)57

.9(2

)11

.147

.180

-89%

(2)

6.5

2.4

51-7

9%(1

)5.

30.

950

% o

r bel

ow2.

2To

tal

(22)

100.

0(1

8)10

0.0

(31)

100.

0(1

9)10

0.0

(18)

100.

010

0.0

Subt

otal

90-

100%

(22)

100.

0(1

8)10

0.0

(29)

93.5

(18)

94.7

(18)

100.

094

.5

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

No.

of s

tude

nts

DN

C1 :

00

00

00

00

00

00

10

0N

o. o

f stu

dent

s at

risk

2 :1

00

11

00

00

00

02

10

Not

es:

1St

uden

ts c

an b

e D

NC

(dee

med

not

cap

able

) onl

y if

they

mee

t one

of t

he c

ondi

tions

(ins

uffic

ient

Eng

lish,

rece

ivin

g D

&I fu

ndin

g, in

suffi

cien

t atte

ndan

ce a

t the

sch

ool o

r ref

erre

dfro

m R

eadi

ng R

ecov

ery)

AN

D re

ad b

elow

the

min

imum

sta

ndar

d.2

The

num

ber o

f stu

dent

s at

risk

is th

e nu

mbe

r of s

tude

nts

read

ing

at le

ss th

en 9

0% a

ccur

acy

at L

evel

1 fo

r Pre

p, L

evel

5 fo

r Yea

r 1 o

r Lev

el 1

5 fo

r Yea

r 2.

Level 15 Level 20Level 599

99Level 1

Prep

Scho

ol20

0420

0520

0620

0720

08

Year

2Sc

hool

2004

2005

2004

Scho

ol20

0720

0520

0820

0720

0620

08

Year

1

2006

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 8

of 5

9

36


Ass

essm

ent o

f Rea

ding

: Pre

p to

Yea

r 2 (d

isco

ntin

ued

at th

e en

d of

200

8)Sc

hool

no:

Not

e: ^

This

dat

a is

hig

hly

skew

ed, w

ith a

lot o

f sch

ools

obt

aini

ng th

e be

st p

ossi

ble

resu

lt, p

artic

ular

lySc

hool

nam

e:N

amel

ess

P-12

Col

lege

in Y

ear 2

. Th

e m

axim

um a

chie

vabl

e pe

rcen

tile

is th

eref

ore

sign

ifica

ntly

less

than

100

.Ex

plan

atio

n:St

uden

ts' a

bilit

y to

read

uns

ight

ed te

xt is

ass

esse

d at

the

end

of e

ach

year

.So

urce

of d

ata:

Dat

a tra

nsm

itted

from

sch

ool t

o D

EEC

D v

ia a

n on

line

web

-form

.

Year

leve

l: Pr

epYe

ar le

vel:

Year

1Ye

ar le

vel:

Year

2Te

xt le

vel:

Leve

l 5Te

xt le

vel:

Leve

l 15

Text

leve

l: Le

vel 2

0

9999

0102030405060708090100

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

90%

-100

% a

ccur

acy

50%

or b

elow

acc

urac

y

percent

Improvement

Improvement

0102030405060708090100

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

90%

-100

% a

ccur

acy

50%

or b

elow

acc

urac

y

percent0102030405060708090100

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

90%

-100

% a

ccur

acy

50%

or b

elow

acc

urac

y

percent

Scho

ol S

core

Stat

e M

ean

Scho

ol T

rend

line

Scho

ol S

core

at z

ero

perc

ent

Improvement

Improvement

Improvement

Improvement

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 9

of 5

9

90%

-100

% a

ccur

acy

as p

erce

ntile

aga

inst

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge

0102030405060708090100

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

90%

-100

% a

ccur

acy

50%

or b

elow

acc

urac

y

percent

Improvement

Improvement

0102030405060708090100

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

90%

-100

% a

ccur

acy

50%

or b

elow

acc

urac

y

percent0102030405060708090100

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

90%

-100

% a

ccur

acy

50%

or b

elow

acc

urac

y

percent

Scho

ol S

core

Stat

e M

ean

Scho

ol T

rend

line

Scho

ol S

core

at z

ero

perc

ent

020

4060

8010

0

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2005

-20

08

perc

entil

e0

2040

6080

100

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2005

-20

08

perc

entil

e0

2040

6080

100

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2005

-20

08

perc

entil

e

Scho

ol S

core

as

perc

entile

Scho

ol p

erce

ntile

ha

s re

ache

d th

e m

axim

um^

Max

imum

sch

ool

scor

e pe

rcen

tile^

SFO

per

cent

ile

rang

e

Improvement

Improvement

Improvement

Improvement

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 9

of 5

9

37


Teac

her J

udgm

ents

aga

inst

the

VELS

- Ye

ar le

vels

Pre

p-6

com

bine

dSc

hool

no:

9999

Scho

ol n

ame:

Nam

eles

s P-

12 C

olle

geSo

urce

of d

ata:

Data

retri

eved

ele

ctro

nica

lly fr

om C

ASES

21.

Expl

anat

ion:

Sem

este

r 2 te

ache

r jud

gmen

ts o

f stu

dent

ach

ieve

men

t aga

inst

the

VELS

.

Year

Lev

els:

2008

152

1429

499

015

213

2850

72

152

120

735

115

37

1769

71

153

318

745

020

0914

822

2745

52

148

2427

3810

114

83

2766

40

149

933

507

114

68

2364

51

2010

151

1442

404

115

115

3442

90

151

033

643

115

111

2956

32

151

1026

603

1

Note

:*

The

scho

ol tr

endl

ine

is on

ly pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is da

ta fo

r eac

h ca

lend

ar y

ear.

% A

% B

Prep

-6(c

ombi

ned)

% C

% C

% D

tota

l st

uden

ts

% A

% B

tota

l st

uden

ts

% E

% D

% E

% E

% E

% B

tota

l st

uden

ts

% A

% B

% C

% E

% C

% D

tota

l st

uden

ts

% A

% B

% C

% D

% D

tota

l st

uden

ts

% A

Read

ing

Mea

sure

men

t, Ch

ance

& D

ata

Num

ber

Spea

king

& L

iste

ning

Writ

ing

-100-8

0

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

percent.

%A

%B

%C

%D

%E

%AB

CTr

endl

ine*

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 1

0 of

59

38


Teac

her J

udgm

ents

aga

inst

the

VELS

- En

glis

h (p

rimar

y)Sc

hool

no:

Note

s:Sc

hool

nam

e:N

amel

ess

P-12

Col

lege

Sour

ce o

f dat

a: D

ata

retri

eved

ele

ctro

nica

lly fr

om C

ASES

21.

Expl

anat

ion:

Sem

este

r 2 te

ache

r jud

gmen

ts o

f stu

dent

ach

ieve

men

t aga

inst

the

VELS

.

Rea

ding

Writ

ing

tota

lto

tal

tota

lto

tal

stud

ents

AB

CD

ESc

hool

Stat

e^st

uden

tsA

BC

DE

Scho

olSt

ate^

stud

ents

AB

CD

ESc

hool

Stat

e^st

uden

tsA

BC

DE

Scho

olSt

ate^

2008

2119

3343

50

1.15

1.01

2008

2917

3838

70

3.13

2.99

2008

2119

4829

50

1.17

0.97

2008

297

4141

73

3.04

2.92

2009

234

3061

40

0.99

1.02

2009

2020

2535

1010

3.00

3.02

2009

2339

2235

40

1.16

0.98

2009

2010

2055

150

2.95

2.94

2010

297

4152

00

1.09

2010

1735

4712

60

3.26

2010

2914

3445

70

1.07

2010

1718

3541

60

3.12

2008

2326

3539

00

1.75

1.58

2008

170

1259

290

3.29

3.47

2008

2313

3057

00

1.62

1.49

2008

170

676

180

3.32

3.40

2009

2232

3632

00

1.74

1.58

2009

2914

3152

03

3.59

3.49

2009

2232

559

50

1.78

1.50

2009

2921

2434

173

3.51

3.42

2010

1822

6711

00

1.78

2010

190

1668

115

3.30

2010

180

5644

00

1.60

2010

195

3253

110

3.50

2008

1828

1756

00

2.18

2.06

2008

240

2958

130

3.96

3.96

2008

1839

1150

00

2.22

1.97

2008

240

1367

174

3.80

3.90

2009

1833

1744

60

2.25

2.07

2009

1712

1853

180

3.94

4.00

2009

1817

3350

00

2.21

1.98

2009

176

1259

240

3.87

3.92

2010

2214

5923

50

2.18

2010

280

3957

40

4.03

2010

2232

4123

50

2.27

2010

2811

2543

210

3.91

2008

205

3055

100

2.53

2.52

2008

2020

4035

05

2.64

2.44

2009

1942

2632

00

2.83

2.54

2009

1942

2132

50

2.76

2.46

2010

1833

2239

60

2.69

2010

1822

2250

60

2.64

Rea

ding

Writ

ing

Scho

ol M

ean

agai

nst S

tate

Mea

n^Sc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ile a

gain

st S

FO p

erce

ntile

rang

e^Sc

hool

Mea

n ag

ains

t Sta

te M

ean^

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

aga

inst

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge^

9999

Mea

n Sc

ore

% o

f stu

dent

s by

gra

de

Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3

Yr 5 Yr 6

Mea

n Sc

ore

Yr 4

% o

f stu

dent

s by

gra

de%

of s

tude

nts

by g

rade

% o

f stu

dent

s by

gra

deM

ean

Scor

eM

ean

Scor

e

Prep

Prep Yr 1 Yr 2

Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6

Yr 3

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6

perc

entile

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

SFO

Per

cent

ile ra

nge

-100-8

0-6

0-4

0-2

0020406080100

20082009

2010

200820092010

2008

20092010

2008

20092010

20082009

2010

200820092010

2008

20092010

Prep

Yr 1

Yr 2

Yr 3

Yr 4

Yr 5

Yr 6

percent

-100-8

0-6

0-4

0-2

0020406080100

20082009

2010

2008

20092010

2008

20092010

20082009

2010

2008

20092010

2008

20092010

20082009

2010

Prep

Yr 1

Yr 2

Yr 3

Yr 4

Yr 5

Yr 6

percent

%A

%B

%C

%D

%E

%AB

CTr

endl

ine*

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

Prep

Yr 1

Yr 2

Yr 3

Yr 4

Yr 5

Yr 6

mean VELS score

Scho

ol M

ean

Stat

e M

ean

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010


perc

entile

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

SFO

Per

cent

ile ra

nge

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

Prep

Yr 1

Yr 2

Yr 3

Yr 4

Yr 5

Yr 6

mean VELS score

Scho

ol M

ean

Stat

e M

ean

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

only

plot

ted

when

ther

e is

data

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.^

201

0 be

nchm

arks

and

per

cent

iles

will

be c

alcu

late

d in

Aug

ust,

when

dat

a fro

mal

l sch

ools

has

been

sub

mitt

ed.

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Divi

sion

, DEE

CD

Page

11

of 5

9

39


Teac

her J

udgm

ents

aga

inst

the

VELS

- En

glis

h (p

rimar

y)Sc

hool

no:

Note

s:Sc

hool

nam

e:N

amel

ess

P-12

Col

lege

Sour

ce o

f dat

a: D

ata

retri

eved

ele

ctro

nica

lly fr

om C

ASES

21.

Expl

anat

ion:

Sem

este

r 2 te

ache

r jud

gmen

ts o

f stu

dent

ach

ieve

men

t aga

inst

the

VELS

.

Spea

king

and

Lis

teni

ngto

tal

tota

lst

uden

tsA

BC

DE

Scho

olSt

ate^

stud

ents

AB

CD

ESc

hool

Stat

e^20

0821

019

810

01.

020.

9720

0829

331

623

03.

082.

9520

0923

939

520

01.

080.

9820

0920

030

655

03.

052.

9720

1029

010

900

00.

9720

1017

041

530

63.

0120

0823

017

784

01.

481.

4920

0817

00

8812

03.

323.

4420

0922

023

770

01.

501.

5020

0929

328

627

03.

513.

4620

1018

039

566

01.

5720

1019

016

795

03.

4220

0818

017

830

02.

011.

9820

0824

017

718

43.

863.

9520

0918

011

890

01.

962.

0020

0917

029

5912

03.

963.

9720

1022

036

640

02.

0820

1028

032

617

03.

9720

0820

035

5510

02.

512.

4620

0919

1126

585

02.

572.

4820

1018

072

280

02.

68

Spea

king

and

Lis

teni

ngSc

hool

Mea

n ag

ains

t Sta

te M

ean^

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

aga

inst

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge^

Yr 3Prep Yr 1 Yr 2

Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6

% o

f stu

dent

s by

gra

deM

ean

Scor

e%

of s

tude

nts

by g

rade

9999

Mea

n Sc

ore

-100-8

0-6

0-4

0-2

0020406080100

20082009

2010

200820092010

2008

20092010

2008

20092010

20082009

2010

200820092010

2008

20092010

Prep

Yr 1

Yr 2

Yr 3

Yr 4

Yr 5

Yr 6

percent

%A

%B

%C

%D

%E

%AB

CTr

endl

ine*

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

Prep

Yr 1

Yr 2

Yr 3

Yr 4

Yr 5

Yr 6

mean VELS score

Scho

ol M

ean

Stat

e M

ean

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010


perc

entile

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

SFO

Per

cent

ile ra

nge

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

only

plot

ted

when

ther

e is

data

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.^

201

0 be

nchm

arks

and

per

cent

iles

will

be c

alcu

late

d in

Aug

ust,

when

dat

a fro

mal

l sch

ools

has

been

sub

mitt

ed.

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Divi

sion

, DEE

CD

Page

12

of 5

9

40


Teac

her J

udgm

ents

aga

inst

the

VELS

- M

athe

mat

ics

(prim

ary)

Scho

ol n

o:No

tes:

Scho

ol n

ame:

Nam

eles

s P-

12 C

olle

geSo

urce

of d

ata:

Dat

a re

triev

ed e

lect

roni

cally

from

CAS

ES21

.Ex

plan

atio

n:Se

mes

ter 2

teac

her j

udgm

ents

of s

tude

nt a

chie

vem

ent a

gain

st th

e VE

LS.

Num

ber

Mea

sure

men

t, C

hanc

e an

d D

ata

tota

lto

tal

tota

lto

tal

stud

ents

AB

CD

ESc

hool

Stat

e^st

uden

tsA

BC

DE

Scho

olSt

ate^

stud

ents

AB

CD

ESc

hool

Stat

e^st

uden

tsA

BC

DE

Scho

olSt

ate^

2008

2119

2952

00

1.18

1.00

2008

290

093

70

2.91

2.97

2008

215

3857

00

1.13

0.98

2008

290

097

30

2.94

2.96

2009

240

3863

00

1.01

1.01

2009

200

4540

150

3.01

2.99

2009

210

010

00

00.

980.

9820

0920

045

4015

03.

042.

9720

1029

734

590

01.

0920

1017

4124

246

63.

1320

1029

331

623

01.

0420

1017

6518

126

03.

3220

0823

917

740

01.

571.

5120

0817

00

946

03.

373.

4520

0823

013

870

01.

511.

4920

0817

00

946

03.

433.

4420

0922

541

550

01.

671.

5320

0929

1431

487

03.

533.

4620

0922

50

950

01.

571.

5020

0929

2434

383

03.

663.

4520

1018

011

890

01.

4920

1019

1121

585

53.

5020

1018

017

830

01.

5420

1019

011

7911

03.

4220

0819

2111

5811

02.

072.

0020

0824

417

6713

03.

933.

9520

0819

016

840

01.

991.

9820

0824

417

6713

03.

953.

9420

0918

1733

500

02.

172.

0220

0917

029

3529

63.

843.

9720

0918

039

610

02.

101.

9920

0917

06

7118

63.

793.

9520

1022

1445

410

02.

1820

1028

032

577

43.

9420

1022

527

680

02.

1120

1028

039

544

44.

0020

0820

050

3510

52.

472.

4920

0820

1545

2515

02.

592.

4720

0919

2611

585

02.

592.

5020

0919

1632

530

02.

622.

4820

1018

1128

610

02.

5320

1018

1133

560

02.

56

Num

ber

Mea

sure

men

t, C

hanc

e an

d D

ata

Scho

ol M

ean

agai

nst S

tate

Mea

n^Sc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ile a

gain

st S

FO p

erce

ntile

rang

e^Sc

hool

Mea

n ag

ains

t Sta

te M

ean^

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

aga

inst

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge^

Prep Yr 1 Yr 2

Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6

Yr 3

Mea

n Sc

ore

Yr 4

% o

f stu

dent

s by

gra

de%

of s

tude

nts

by g

rade

% o

f stu

dent

s by

gra

deM

ean

Scor

eM

ean

Scor

e

Prep

9999

Mea

n Sc

ore

% o

f stu

dent

s by

gra

de

Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3

Yr 5 Yr 6

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010


perc

entile

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

SFO

Per

cent

ile ra

nge

-100-8

0-6

0-4

0-2

0020406080100

20082009

2010

200820092010

2008

20092010

2008

20092010

20082009

2010

200820092010

2008

20092010

Prep

Yr 1

Yr 2

Yr 3

Yr 4

Yr 5

Yr 6

percent

-100-8

0-6

0-4

0-2

0020406080100

2008

20092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

Prep

Yr 1

Yr 2

Yr 3

Yr 4

Yr 5

Yr 6

percent

%A

%B

%C

%D

%E

%AB

CTr

endl

ine*

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

Prep

Yr 1

Yr 2

Yr 3

Yr 4

Yr 5

Yr 6

mean VELS score

Scho

ol M

ean

Stat

e M

ean

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010


perc

entile

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

SFO

Per

cent

ile ra

nge

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

Prep

Yr 1

Yr 2

Yr 3

Yr 4

Yr 5

Yr 6

mean VELS score

Scho

ol M

ean

Stat

e M

ean

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

only

plot

ted

when

ther

e is

data

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.^

201

0 be

nchm

arks

and

per

cent

iles

will

be c

alcu

late

d in

Aug

ust,

when

dat

a fro

mal

l sch

ools

has

been

sub

mitt

ed.

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Divi

sion

, DEE

CD

Page

13

of 5

9

41


Teacher Judgments against the VELS - English (primary)School no:School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.

Reading

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.25

1.50

1.75

2.00

2.25

2.50

2.75

3.00

3.25

3.50

3.75

4.00

4.25

4.50

4.75

5.00

5.25

5.50

5.75

6.00

6.25

6.50

6.75

prep 2010 29 29 3 12 12 2 1.09

prep 2009 23 23 1 3 11 7 1 0.99 1.02 -0.03yr1 2010 18 18 2 12 4 1.78

prep 2008 21 21 1 1 8 7 2 1 1 1.15 1.01 0.14yr1 2009 22 22 2 5 8 6 1 1.74 1.58 0.16yr2 2010 22 22 1 1 4 13 3 2.18

yr1 2008 23 23 9 8 4 1 1 1.75 1.58 0.17yr2 2009 18 18 1 2 6 3 1 3 2 2.25 2.07 0.18yr3 2010 18 18 1 3 4 4 4 1 1 2.69

yr2 2008 18 18 10 3 5 2.18 2.06 0.12yr3 2009 19 19 1 5 5 5 1 2 2.83 2.54 0.29yr4 2010 17 17 1 2 8 6 3.26

yr3 2008 20 20 2 1 10 6 1 2.53 2.52 0.01yr4 2009 20 20 2 1 1 7 5 4 3.00 3.02 -0.02yr5 2010 19 19 1 1 1 9 4 3 3.30

yr4 2008 29 29 2 3 8 11 4 1 3.13 2.99 0.14yr5 2009 29 29 1 5 10 9 2 2 3.59 3.49 0.09yr6 2010 28 28 1 6 10 11 4.03

yr5 2008 17 17 1 4 5 5 2 3.29 3.47 -0.17yr6 2009 17 17 1 2 4 5 3 2 3.94 4.00 -0.06

yr6 2008 25 24 1 2 4 10 7 3.96 3.96 0.00

shading indicates a 'C' grade (at the expected standard) on the VELS scale.

Notes:1 The total number of students eligible to be assessed. This figure will typically match, or be very close to, the Year Level enrolment.2 The number of students assessed against the VELS. The difference between this figure and the total (1) should be accounted for

by students assessed against Individual Learning Plans and/or the ESL companion in the case of English.^ 2010 benchmarks will be calculated in August, when data from all schools has been submitted.

Year

Lev

el

Year

Tota

l1

Asse

ssed

2

State mean^

Difference between

school and state

mean^

9999

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 5 Level 6 Level 6ESchool mean

Level 4

-0.20

-0.10

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

2010

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2008

prep prep yr1 prep yr1 yr2 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr2 yr3 yr4 yr3 yr4 yr5 yr4 yr5 yr6 yr5 yr6 yr6

Difference between school mean and state mean^, by cohort group

diffe

renc

e be

twee

n sc

hool

mea

n an

d st

ate

mea

n

Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD Page 14 of 59

42



Writing

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.25

1.50

1.75

2.00

2.25

2.50

2.75

3.00

3.25

3.50

3.75

4.00

4.25

4.50

4.75

5.00

5.25

5.50

5.75

6.00

6.25

6.50

6.75

prep 2010 29 29 2 1 12 10 4 1.07

prep 2009 23 23 1 2 6 5 9 1.16 0.98 0.18yr1 2010 18 18 3 5 10 1.60

prep 2008 21 21 1 1 5 10 3 1 1.17 0.97 0.19yr1 2009 22 22 1 2 12 6 1 1.78 1.50 0.28yr2 2010 22 22 1 5 9 4 3 2.27

yr1 2008 23 23 4 9 7 2 1 1.62 1.49 0.13yr2 2009 18 18 9 6 3 2.21 1.98 0.23yr3 2010 18 18 1 3 6 4 2 1 1 2.64

yr2 2008 18 18 2 7 2 5 2 2.22 1.97 0.26yr3 2009 19 19 1 3 3 4 5 2 1 2.76 2.46 0.30yr4 2010 17 17 1 2 5 6 3 3.12

yr3 2008 20 20 1 1 6 8 4 2.64 2.44 0.19yr4 2009 20 20 2 1 4 7 4 2 2.95 2.94 0.01yr5 2010 19 19 1 1 3 7 6 1 3.50

yr4 2008 29 29 1 1 1 3 9 12 1 1 3.04 2.92 0.13yr5 2009 29 29 1 1 4 5 5 7 4 2 3.51 3.42 0.09yr6 2010 28 28 2 4 10 2 7 2 1 3.91

yr5 2008 17 17 1 2 6 7 1 3.32 3.40 -0.08yr6 2009 17 17 2 2 3 7 2 1 3.87 3.92 -0.05

yr6 2008 25 24 1 1 3 9 7 3 3.80 3.90 -0.09




Difference between

school and state

mean^

9999


Level 4

Year

Lev

el

Year

Tota

l1

Asse

ssed

2

State mean^

-0.15

-0.10

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

2010

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2008



diffe

renc

e be

twee

n sc

hool

mea

n an

d st

ate

mea

n


43



Speaking and Listening

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.25

1.50

1.75

2.00

2.25

2.50

2.75

3.00

3.25

3.50

3.75

4.00

4.25

4.50

4.75

5.00

5.25

5.50

5.75

6.00

6.25

6.50

6.75

prep 2010 29 29 3 23 3 0.97

prep 2009 23 23 3 9 9 2 1.08 0.98 0.09yr1 2010 18 18 1 10 7 1.57

prep 2008 21 21 1 16 4 1.02 0.97 0.05yr1 2009 22 22 5 12 5 1.50 1.50 0.00yr2 2010 22 22 1 13 8 2.08

yr1 2008 23 23 1 4 14 4 1.48 1.49 -0.01yr2 2009 18 18 5 11 2 1.96 2.00 -0.04yr3 2010 18 18 5 13 2.68

yr2 2008 18 18 2 13 3 2.01 1.98 0.03yr3 2009 19 19 1 2 9 5 2 2.57 2.48 0.09yr4 2010 17 17 1 2 7 7 3.01

yr3 2008 20 20 1 1 1 10 7 2.51 2.46 0.05yr4 2009 20 20 1 13 6 3.05 2.97 0.08yr5 2010 19 19 1 7 8 3 3.42

yr4 2008 29 29 1 1 17 9 1 3.08 2.95 0.12yr5 2009 29 29 2 6 12 8 1 3.51 3.46 0.05yr6 2010 28 28 1 1 7 10 9 3.97

yr5 2008 17 17 1 1 7 8 3.32 3.44 -0.12yr6 2009 17 17 1 1 3 7 5 3.96 3.97 -0.01

yr6 2008 25 24 1 1 1 8 9 4 3.86 3.95 -0.08




Year

Lev

el

Year

Tota

l1

Asse

ssed

2

State mean^

Difference between

school and state

mean^

9999


Level 4

-0.15

-0.10

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

2010

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2008



diffe

renc

e be

twee

n sc

hool

mea

n an

d st

ate

mea

n


44


Teacher Judgments against the VELS - Mathematics (primary)School no:School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.

Number

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.25

1.50

1.75

2.00

2.25

2.50

2.75

3.00

3.25

3.50

3.75

4.00

4.25

4.50

4.75

5.00

5.25

5.50

5.75

6.00

6.25

6.50

6.75

prep 2010 29 29 2 15 10 2 1.09

prep 2009 24 24 4 11 9 1.01 1.01 0.00yr1 2010 18 18 3 13 2 1.49

prep 2008 21 21 1 10 6 3 1 1.18 1.00 0.18yr1 2009 22 22 1 11 9 1 1.67 1.53 0.14yr2 2010 22 22 5 4 10 2 1 2.18

yr1 2008 23 23 2 15 4 2 1.57 1.51 0.05yr2 2009 18 18 9 6 3 2.17 2.02 0.15yr3 2010 18 18 7 4 5 2 2.53

yr2 2008 19 19 2 1 10 2 4 2.07 2.00 0.06yr3 2009 19 19 1 2 9 2 5 2.59 2.50 0.09yr4 2010 17 17 1 1 3 1 4 7 3.13

yr3 2008 20 20 1 2 2 5 10 2.47 2.49 -0.01yr4 2009 20 20 1 2 1 7 9 3.01 2.99 0.03yr5 2010 19 19 1 1 1 10 4 2 3.50

yr4 2008 29 29 2 6 21 2.91 2.97 -0.06yr5 2009 29 29 1 1 10 4 9 3 1 3.53 3.46 0.06yr6 2010 28 28 1 2 7 9 9 3.94

yr5 2008 17 17 1 7 9 3.37 3.45 -0.08yr6 2009 17 17 1 1 4 1 5 5 3.84 3.97 -0.13

yr6 2008 25 24 2 1 5 11 4 1 3.93 3.95 -0.03




Difference between

school and state

mean^

9999


Level 4

Year

Lev

el

Year

Tota

l1

Asse

ssed

2

State mean^

-0.20

-0.15

-0.10

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

2010

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2008



diffe

renc

e be

twee

n sc

hool

mea

n an

d st

ate

mea

n


45


Teacher Judgments against the VELS - Mathematics (primary)School no:School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.

Measurement, Chance and Data

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.25

1.50

1.75

2.00

2.25

2.50

2.75

3.00

3.25

3.50

3.75

4.00

4.25

4.50

4.75

5.00

5.25

5.50

5.75

6.00

6.25

6.50

6.75

prep 2010 29 29 1 1 17 9 1 1.04

prep 2009 24 21 1 20 0.98 0.98 0.00yr1 2010 18 18 15 3 1.54

prep 2008 21 21 1 11 8 1 1.13 0.98 0.15yr1 2009 22 22 21 1 1.57 1.50 0.07yr2 2010 22 22 3 12 6 1 2.11

yr1 2008 23 23 2 18 3 1.51 1.49 0.02yr2 2009 18 18 11 7 2.10 1.99 0.11yr3 2010 18 18 6 4 6 2 2.56

yr2 2008 19 19 4 12 3 1.99 1.98 0.01yr3 2009 19 19 5 5 6 1 2 2.62 2.48 0.13yr4 2010 17 17 1 1 1 3 11 3.32

yr3 2008 20 20 1 2 1 4 9 3 2.59 2.47 0.12yr4 2009 20 20 3 8 9 3.04 2.97 0.07yr5 2010 19 19 1 1 3 12 2 3.42

yr4 2008 29 29 1 5 23 2.94 2.96 -0.02yr5 2009 29 29 1 4 7 10 7 3.66 3.45 0.21yr6 2010 28 28 1 1 5 10 11 4.00

yr5 2008 17 17 1 3 13 3.43 3.44 -0.01yr6 2009 17 17 1 1 2 4 8 1 3.79 3.95 -0.16

yr6 2008 25 24 1 2 4 12 4 1 3.95 3.94 0.01




Year

Lev

el

Year

Tota

l1

Asse

ssed

2

State mean^

Difference between

school and state

mean^

9999


Level 4

-0.20

-0.15

-0.10

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

2010

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2008



diffe

renc

e be

twee

n sc

hool

mea

n an

d st

ate

mea

n


46


Teac

her J

udgm

ents

aga

inst

the

VELS

- Ye

ar le

vels

7-1

0 co

mbi

ned

Scho

ol n

o:99

99Sc

hool

nam

e:N

amel

ess

P-12

Col

lege

Sour

ce o

f dat

a:Da

ta re

triev

ed e

lect

roni

cally

from

CAS

ES21

.Ex

plan

atio

n:Se

mes

ter 2

teac

her j

udgm

ents

of s

tude

nt a

chie

vem

ent a

gain

st th

e VE

LS.

Year

Lev

els:

2008

723

1758

211

720

1954

188

730

1863

181

706

2057

161

704

2657

111

2009

694

1951

206

691

2345

237

680

1263

250

607

1843

283

605

2243

255

2010

625

1848

245

623

1053

268

623

661

272

636

1452

1710

6311

1646

1710

Note

:*

The

scho

ol tr

endl

ine

is on

ly pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is da

ta fo

r eac

h ca

lend

ar y

ear.

% E

% C

Read

ing

Stru

ctur

eM

easu

rem

ent,

Chan

ce &

Dat

aSp

eaki

ng &

Lis

teni

ngW

ritin

g

% D

tota

l st

uden

ts

% A

% B

% C

% D

% D

tota

l st

uden

ts

% A

% B

% E

% E

7-10

(com

bine

d)

tota

l st

uden

ts

% A

% B

% C

% C

% C

% D

% D

tota

l st

uden

ts

% A

% E

% B

% E

tota

l st

uden

ts

% A

% B

-100-8

0

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

percent.

%A

%B

%C

%D

%E

%AB

CTr

endl

ine*

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 1

9 of

59

47


Teac

her J

udgm

ents

aga

inst

the

VELS

- En

glis

h (s

econ

dary

)Sc

hool

no:

Note

s:Sc

hool

nam

e:N

amel

ess

P-12

Col

lege

Sour

ce o

f dat

a: D

ata

retri

eved

ele

ctro

nica

lly fr

om C

ASES

21.

Expl

anat

ion:

Sem

este

r 2 te

ache

r jud

gmen

ts o

f stu

dent

ach

ieve

men

t aga

inst

the

VELS

.

Rea

ding

Writ

ing

tota

lto

tal

tota

lto

tal

stud

ents

AB

CD

ESc

hool

Stat

e^st

uden

tsA

BC

DE

Scho

olSt

ate^

stud

ents

AB

CD

ESc

hool

Stat

e^st

uden

tsA

BC

DE

Scho

olSt

ate^

2008

157

1373

70

4.38

4.39

2008

186

2833

330

5.32

5.34

2008

150

767

270

4.23

4.36

2008

180

3328

1722

5.21

5.31

2009

1817

1744

220

4.47

4.40

2009

230

1361

917

5.17

5.33

2009

186

2244

226

4.33

4.35

2009

230

3530

2213

5.21

5.29

2010

128

1758

170

4.46

2010

147

2929

360

5.34

2010

128

858

250

4.38

2010

147

743

430

5.25

2008

200

2555

155

4.85

4.84

2008

190

074

260

5.74

5.83

2008

200

3050

1010

4.81

4.82

2008

190

574

210

5.80

5.81

2009

140

2157

210

4.79

4.85

2009

140

2936

360

5.82

5.81

2009

140

1464

210

4.77

4.81

2009

140

1450

297

5.71

5.79

2010

180

1744

2811

4.64

2010

186

1161

176

5.79

2010

180

1744

2811

4.67

2010

180

667

1117

5.67

Rea

ding

Writ

ing

Scho

ol M

ean

agai

nst S

tate

Mea

n^Sc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ile a

gain

st S

FO p

erce

ntile

rang

e^Sc

hool

Mea

n ag

ains

t Sta

te M

ean^

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

aga

inst

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge^

9999

Yr 10

Yr 7 Yr 8

% o

f stu

dent

s by

gra

de%

of s

tude

nts

by g

rade

Mea

n Sc

ore

Yr 7 Yr 8

Yr 9 Yr 10

% o

f stu

dent

s by

gra

deM

ean

Scor

eM

ean

Scor

eM

ean

Scor

e%

of s

tude

nts

by g

rade

Yr 9

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

Yr 7 Yr 8 Yr 9 Yr 10

perc

entile

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

SFO

Per

cent

ile ra

nge

-100-8

0-6

0-4

0-2

0020406080100

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

Yr 7

Yr 8

Yr 9

Yr 1

0

percent

-100-8

0-6

0-4

0-2

0020406080100

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

Yr 7

Yr 8

Yr 9

Yr 1

0

percent

%A

%B

%C

%D

%E

%AB

CTr

end

Line

*

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

Yr 7

Yr 8

Yr 9

Yr 1

0

mean VELS score

Scho

ol M

ean

Stat

e M

ean

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010


perc

entile

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

SFO

Per

cent

ile ra

nge

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

Yr 7

Yr 8

Yr 9

Yr 1

0

mean VELS score

Scho

ol M

ean

Stat

e M

ean

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

only

plot

ted

when

ther

e is

data

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.^

201

0 be

nchm

arks

and

per

cent

iles

will

be c

alcu

late

d in

Aug

ust,

when

dat

a fro

mal

l sch

ools

has

been

sub

mitt

ed.

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Divi

sion

, DEE

CD

Page

20

of 5

9

48


Teac

her J

udgm

ents

aga

inst

the

VELS

- En

glis

h (s

econ

dary

)Sc

hool

no:

Note

s:Sc

hool

nam

e:N

amel

ess

P-12

Col

lege

Sour

ce o

f dat

a: D

ata

retri

eved

ele

ctro

nica

lly fr

om C

ASES

21.

Expl

anat

ion:

Sem

este

r 2 te

ache

r jud

gmen

ts o

f stu

dent

ach

ieve

men

t aga

inst

the

VELS

.

Spea

king

and

Lis

teni

ngto

tal

tota

lst

uden

tsA

BC

DE

Scho

olSt

ate^

stud

ents

AB

CD

ESc

hool

Stat

e^20

0815

027

730

04.

434.

3920

0818

039

2833

05.

335.

3420

0918

06

8311

04.

364.

3920

0923

09

4843

05.

215.

3220

1012

80

7517

04.

2920

1014

014

5036

05.

2920

0820

010

7510

54.

814.

8520

0820

00

7525

05.

755.

8320

0914

00

8614

04.

714.

8420

0913

038

3823

05.

905.

8220

1018

00

5644

04.

5420

1018

611

6711

65.

82

Spea

king

and

Lis

teni

ngSc

hool

Mea

n ag

ains

t Sta

te M

ean^

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

aga

inst

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge^

Yr 7 Yr 8

Yr 9 Yr 10

% o

f stu

dent

s by

gra

deM

ean

Scor

e

9999 %

of s

tude

nts

by g

rade

Mea

n Sc

ore

-100-8

0-6

0-4

0-2

0020406080100

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010Yr

7Yr

8Yr

9Yr

10

percent

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

Yr 7

Yr 8

Yr 9

Yr 1

0

mean VELS score

Scho

ol M

ean

Stat

e M

ean

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010


perc

entile

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

SFO

Per

cent

ile ra

nge

%A

%B

%C

%D

%E

%AB

CTr

end

Line

*

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

only

plot

ted

when

ther

e is

data

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.^

201

0 be

nchm

arks

and

per

cent

iles

will

be c

alcu

late

d in

Aug

ust,

when

dat

a fro

mal

l sch

ools

has

been

sub

mitt

ed.

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Divi

sion

, DEE

CD

Page

21

of 5

9

49


Teac

her J

udgm

ents

aga

inst

the

VELS

- M

athe

mat

ics

(sec

onda

ry)

Scho

ol n

o:No

tes:

Scho

ol n

ame:

Nam

eles

s P-

12 C

olle

geSo

urce

of d

ata:

Dat

a re

triev

ed e

lect

roni

cally

from

CAS

ES21

.Ex

plan

atio

n:Se

mes

ter 2

teac

her j

udgm

ents

of s

tude

nt a

chie

vem

ent a

gain

st th

e VE

LS.

Mea

sure

men

t, C

hanc

e an

d D

ata

Stru

ctur

eto

tal

tota

lto

tal

tota

lst

uden

tsA

BC

DE

Scho

olSt

ate^

stud

ents

AB

CD

ESc

hool

Stat

e^st

uden

tsA

BC

DE

Scho

olSt

ate^

stud

ents

AB

CD

ESc

hool

Stat

e^20

0815

07

6033

04.

324.

3820

0816

038

630

05.

595.

3020

0815

020

6713

04.

404.

3820

0816

019

756

05.

455.

2720

0916

025

5013

134.

304.

3720

0922

1832

1832

05.

475.

2920

0916

025

5013

134.

284.

3620

0922

1436

1827

55.

415.

2620

1012

825

4217

84.

3520

1014

014

4336

75.

1420

1012

825

508

84.

4420

1014

014

4336

75.

1320

0820

020

5525

04.

864.

8220

0819

2116

535

55.

995.

7520

0820

040

4020

04.

954.

8120

0819

1621

535

55.

965.

7220

0914

00

4357

04.

634.

8220

098

00

100

00

5.91

5.75

2009

140

750

430

4.71

4.80

2009

80

088

130

5.78

5.70

2010

1817

1767

00

5.01

2010

190

553

2121

5.57

2010

1833

2244

00

5.21

2010

190

547

2621

5.54

Mea

sure

men

t, C

hanc

e an

d D

ata

Stru

ctur

eSc

hool

Mea

n ag

ains

t Sta

te M

ean^

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

aga

inst

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge^

Scho

ol M

ean

agai

nst S

tate

Mea

n^Sc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ile a

gain

st S

FO p

erce

ntile

rang

e^

Yr 10

% o

f stu

dent

s by

gra

deM

ean

Scor

e

Yr 9

Mea

n Sc

ore

Yr 7 Yr 8

Yr 9 Yr 10

9999

% o

f stu

dent

s by

gra

deM

ean

Scor

eM

ean

Scor

e

Yr 7 Yr 8

% o

f stu

dent

s by

gra

de%

of s

tude

nts

by g

rade

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010


perc

entile

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

SFO

Per

cent

ile ra

nge

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

Yr 7

Yr 8

Yr 9

Yr 1

0

percent

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

Yr 7

Yr 8

Yr 9

Yr 1

0

percent

%A

%B

%C

%D

%E

%AB

CTr

end

Line

*

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

Yr 7

Yr 8

Yr 9

Yr 1

0

mean VELS score

Scho

ol M

ean

Stat

e M

ean

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010


perc

entile

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

SFO

Per

cent

ile ra

nge

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

Yr 7

Yr 8

Yr 9

Yr 1

0

mean VELS score

Scho

ol M

ean

Stat

e M

ean

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

only

plot

ted

when

ther

e is

data

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.^

201

0 be

nchm

arks

and

per

cent

iles

will

be c

alcu

late

d in

Aug

ust,

when

dat

a fro

mal

l sch

ools

has

been

sub

mitt

ed.

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Divi

sion

, DEE

CD

Page

22

of 5

9

50


Teacher Judgments against the VELS - English (secondary)School no:School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.

Reading

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.25

1.50

1.75

2.00

2.25

2.50

2.75

3.00

3.25

3.50

3.75

4.00

4.25

4.50

4.75

5.00

5.25

5.50

5.75

6.00

6.25

6.50

6.75

yr7 2010 12 12 2 3 4 2 1 4.46

yr7 2009 18 18 1 3 2 6 3 3 4.47 4.40 0.08yr8 2010 18 18 2 2 3 7 1 3 4.64

yr7 2008 15 15 1 8 3 2 1 4.38 4.39 -0.01yr8 2009 14 14 1 2 8 3 4.79 4.85 -0.06yr9 2010 14 14 1 4 4 4 1 5.34

yr8 2008 20 20 1 1 2 6 5 5 4.85 4.84 0.01yr9 2009 23 23 1 1 2 2 10 4 3 5.17 5.33 -0.15yr10 2010 18 18 1 2 1 6 5 2 1 5.79

yr9 2008 18 18 2 4 6 5 1 5.32 5.34 -0.02yr10 2009 14 14 1 4 3 2 4 5.82 5.81 0.01

yr10 2008 19 19 2 3 8 6 5.74 5.83 -0.10




9999

Year

Lev

el

Year

Tota

l1

Asse

ssed

2 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5Difference between

school and state

mean^

Level 6 Level 6ESchool mean

State mean^

-0.20

-0.15

-0.10

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

2010 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2008

yr7 yr7 yr8 yr7 yr8 yr9 yr8 yr9 yr10 yr9 yr10 yr10


diffe

renc

e be

twee

n sc

hool

mea

n an

d st

ate

mea

n


51



Writing

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.25

1.50

1.75

2.00

2.25

2.50

2.75

3.00

3.25

3.50

3.75

4.00

4.25

4.50

4.75

5.00

5.25

5.50

5.75

6.00

6.25

6.50

6.75

yr7 2010 12 12 1 2 3 4 1 1 4.38

yr7 2009 18 18 1 4 4 4 4 1 4.33 4.35 -0.02yr8 2010 18 18 2 2 3 7 1 3 4.67

yr7 2008 15 15 2 2 7 3 1 4.23 4.36 -0.13yr8 2009 14 14 3 6 3 2 4.77 4.81 -0.05yr9 2010 14 14 1 5 4 2 1 1 5.25

yr8 2008 20 20 1 1 2 6 4 6 4.81 4.82 0.00yr9 2009 23 23 1 1 1 3 2 4 3 8 5.21 5.29 -0.09yr10 2010 18 18 1 2 1 1 5 7 1 5.67

yr9 2008 18 18 4 1 2 4 1 6 5.21 5.31 -0.10yr10 2009 14 14 1 3 1 3 4 2 5.71 5.79 -0.07

yr10 2008 19 19 1 3 7 7 1 5.80 5.81 -0.01




Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5Difference between

school and state

mean^


State mean^

9999

Year

Lev

el

Year

Tota

l1

Asse

ssed

2 Level 1

-0.14

-0.12

-0.10

-0.08

-0.06

-0.04

-0.02

0.00

2010 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2008



diffe

renc

e be

twee

n sc

hool

mea

n an

d st

ate

mea

n


52



Speaking and Listening

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.25

1.50

1.75

2.00

2.25

2.50

2.75

3.00

3.25

3.50

3.75

4.00

4.25

4.50

4.75

5.00

5.25

5.50

5.75

6.00

6.25

6.50

6.75

yr7 2010 12 12 1 1 7 2 1 4.29

yr7 2009 18 18 2 7 8 1 4.36 4.39 -0.03yr8 2010 18 18 8 9 1 4.54

yr7 2008 15 15 8 3 4 4.43 4.39 0.04yr8 2009 14 14 2 12 4.71 4.84 -0.13yr9 2010 14 14 5 4 3 2 5.29

yr8 2008 20 20 1 1 1 8 7 2 4.81 4.85 -0.03yr9 2009 23 23 3 7 6 5 2 5.21 5.32 -0.11yr10 2010 18 18 1 2 6 6 2 1 5.82

yr9 2008 18 18 2 4 5 7 5.33 5.34 0.00yr10 2009 14 13 1 2 3 2 5 5.90 5.82 0.09

yr10 2008 20 20 2 3 8 7 5.75 5.83 -0.08




9999

Year

Lev

el

Year

Tota

l1

Asse

ssed


school and state

mean^


State mean^

-0.15

-0.10

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

2010 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2008



diffe

renc

e be

twee

n sc

hool

mea

n an

d st

ate

mea

n


53


Teacher Judgments against the VELS - Mathematics (secondary)School no:School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.

Measurement, Chance and Data

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.25

1.50

1.75

2.00

2.25

2.50

2.75

3.00

3.25

3.50

3.75

4.00

4.25

4.50

4.75

5.00

5.25

5.50

5.75

6.00

6.25

6.50

6.75

yr7 2010 12 12 1 2 3 2 3 1 4.35

yr7 2009 16 16 2 2 5 3 4 4.30 4.37 -0.07yr8 2010 18 18 8 4 3 3 5.01

yr7 2008 15 15 5 2 7 1 4.32 4.38 -0.07yr8 2009 14 14 1 7 4 2 4.63 4.82 -0.19yr9 2010 14 14 1 3 2 5 1 2 5.14

yr8 2008 20 20 2 3 3 8 4 4.86 4.82 0.04yr9 2009 22 22 4 3 1 3 7 3 1 5.47 5.29 0.17yr10 2010 19 19 2 2 2 2 6 4 1 5.57

yr9 2008 16 16 10 6 5.59 5.30 0.29yr10 2009 8 8 3 5 5.91 5.75 0.16

yr10 2008 19 19 1 1 6 4 3 1 3 5.99 5.75 0.24




Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5Difference between

school and state

mean^


State mean^

9999

Year

Lev

el

Year

Tota

l1

Asse

ssed

2 Level 1

-0.30

-0.20

-0.10

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

2010 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2008



diffe

renc

e be

twee

n sc

hool

mea

n an

d st

ate

mea

n


54


Teacher Judgments against the VELS - Mathematics (secondary)School no:School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.

Structure

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.25

1.50

1.75

2.00

2.25

2.50

2.75

3.00

3.25

3.50

3.75

4.00

4.25

4.50

4.75

5.00

5.25

5.50

5.75

6.00

6.25

6.50

6.75

yr7 2010 12 12 1 1 6 3 1 4.44

yr7 2009 16 16 2 2 6 2 4 4.28 4.36 -0.08yr8 2010 18 18 4 4 4 3 3 5.21

yr7 2008 15 15 2 5 5 3 4.40 4.38 0.02yr8 2009 14 14 3 3 2 5 1 4.71 4.80 -0.08yr9 2010 14 14 1 3 2 6 2 5.13

yr8 2008 20 20 1 3 3 5 8 4.95 4.81 0.14yr9 2009 22 22 1 4 2 2 2 8 3 5.41 5.26 0.15yr10 2010 19 19 2 2 3 2 5 4 1 5.54

yr9 2008 16 16 1 4 8 3 5.45 5.27 0.19yr10 2009 8 8 1 5 2 5.78 5.70 0.08

yr10 2008 19 19 1 1 7 3 4 1 2 5.96 5.72 0.24




9999

Year

Lev

el

Year

Tota

l1

Asse

ssed


school and state

mean^


State mean^

-0.10

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

2010 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2008



diffe

renc

e be

twee

n sc

hool

mea

n an

d st

ate

mea

n


55


ESL Companion GuideSchool no:School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Assessment of students against the ESL (English as a Second Language) Companion Guide.

Students assessed on the ESL Companion Guide, 2010:Reading: 22

Writing: 22Speaking & Listening: 22

Enrolment at February 2010 census: 250

Reading, 2010

Writing, 2010

Speaking and Listening, 2010

9999

1

2 2

1 1

2

3

1 1

2

3

2

1

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

A1.1

A1.2

A1.3

A2.1

A2.2

A2.3

B0.1

B0.2

B0.3

B1.1

B1.2

B1.3

B2.1

B2.2

B2.3

B3.1

B3.2

B3.3

S0.1

S0.2

S0.3

S1.1

S1.2

S1.3

S2.1

S2.2

S2.3

S3.1

S3.2

S3.3

S4.1

S4.2

S4.3

Primary (Years P to 2) Primary (Years 3 to 6) Secondary (Years 7 to 10)

num

ber o

f stu

dent

s

1 1

2

1

2

3

1 1

2

1

2

1

2 2

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

A1.1

A1.2

A1.3

A2.1

A2.2

A2.3

B0.1

B0.2

B0.3

B1.1

B1.2

B1.3

B2.1

B2.2

B2.3

B3.1

B3.2

B3.3

S0.1

S0.2

S0.3

S1.1

S1.2

S1.3

S2.1

S2.2

S2.3

S3.1

S3.2

S3.3

S4.1

S4.2

S4.3


num

ber o

f stu

dent

s

1 1

2

1 1

3

1 1 1

2

1

2

1 1

2

1

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

A1.1

A1.2

A1.3

A2.1

A2.2

A2.3

B0.1

B0.2

B0.3

B1.1

B1.2

B1.3

B2.1

B2.2

B2.3

B3.1

B3.2

B3.3

S0.1

S0.2

S0.3

S1.1

S1.2

S1.3

S2.1

S2.2

S2.3

S3.1

S3.2

S3.3

S4.1

S4.2

S4.3


num

ber o

f stu

dent

s

Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 18/03/2011Page 28 of 59

56


NAP

LAN

Yea

r 3 a

nd 5

: Rea

ding

Scho

ol n

o:Sc

hool

nam

e:N

amel

ess

P-12

Col

lege

Sour

ce o

f dat

a: V

icto

rian

Cur

ricul

um a

nd A

sses

smen

t Aut

horit

y.Ex

plan

atio

n:Th

e N

atio

nal A

sses

smen

t Pro

gram

- Li

tera

cy a

nd N

umer

acy

(NAP

LAN

) is

cond

ucte

d ea

ch y

ear f

or s

tude

nts

in Y

ears

3, 5

, 7 a

nd 9

. Fo

r mor

e de

taile

d N

APLA

N d

ata,

refe

r to

the

NAP

LAN

Dat

a Se

rvic

ew

ebsi

te a

t http

://na

plan

ds.v

caa.

vic.

edu.

au.

A re

fere

nce

guid

e fo

r ana

lysin

g N

APLA

N d

ata

is a

vaila

ble

at h

ttp://

ww

w.v

caa.

vic.

edu.

au/v

caa/

prep

10/n

apla

n/sc

hool

s/an

alys

ingn

apla

ndat

a.pd

f.

Year

3Ye

ar 5

(n)

(%)

12

34

56

Scho

olSt

ate

(n)

(%)

34

56

78

Scho

olSt

ate

2008

1895

66

60

7112

430.

541

5.8

2008

1694

013

2556

06

478.

449

2.1

2009

1689

00

06

2569

530.

242

7.5

2009

2997

74

1414

3921

528.

650

2.4

Scho

olSt

ate

2010

1810

00

011

2222

4447

2.0

427.

420

1020

100

1020

3520

105

461.

449

7.9

2008

-10

1817

35.5

82.0

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

NAP

Ban

dPe

rcen

t of s

tude

nts

by N

AP B

and

Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

aga

inst

Sta

te M

ean

Mea

n Sc

aled

Sc

ore

Gro

wth

MC

tota

lM

C w

ith 2

sc

ores

Num

ber o

f stu

dent

sM

atch

ed C

ohor

t (M

C)

9999

stud

ent

parti

cipa

tion*

*Ba

ndPe

rcen

t of s

tude

nts

by N

AP B

and

Mea

n Sc

aled

Scor

est

uden

tpa

rtici

patio

n**

Mea

n Sc

aled

Scor

eBa

ndPe

rcen

t of s

tude

nts

by N

AP B

and

-40

-20020406080100

percent

-40

-20020406080100

percent

Not

es:

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= st

uden

ts w

ho p

artic

ipat

ed in

NAP

LAN

(not

abs

ent /

with

draw

n bu

t inc

ludi

ng e

xem

pt) /

tota

l num

ber o

f stu

dent

s (in

clud

ing

exem

pt /

abse

nt /

with

draw

n).

120

160

200

240

ed score growth

Year

3Ye

ar 5

Scho

ol M

ean

agai

nst S

tate

Mea

n,Sc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ile a

gain

stSc

hool

Mea

n ag

ains

t Sta

te M

ean,

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

aga

inst

incl

udin

g Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge

incl

udin

g Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge

Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

as

perc

entil

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

percent

%>=

Band

3 Sc

hool

Tr

endl

ine*

% B

and

1&2

% B

and

3%

Ban

d 4

% B

and

5&6

0255075100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010


mean scaled score

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

percent

%>=

Band

5 Sc

hool

Tr

endl

ine*

% B

and

3&4

% B

and

5%

Ban

d 6

% B

and

7&8

0255075100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010


mean scaled score

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

Not

es:

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= st

uden

ts w

ho p

artic

ipat

ed in

NAP

LAN

(not

abs

ent /

with

draw

n bu

t inc

ludi

ng e

xem

pt) /

tota

l num

ber o

f stu

dent

s (in

clud

ing

exem

pt /

abse

nt /

with

draw

n).

04080120

160

200

240

2008

-10

mean scaled score growth

Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

Stat

e M

ean

Gro

wth

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

-10

perc

entil

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

percent

%>=

Band

3 Sc

hool

Tr

endl

ine*

% B

and

1&2

% B

and

3%

Ban

d 4

% B

and

5&6

0255075100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010


mean scaled score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

eSt

ate

Mea

n Sc

ore

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Stud

ent P

artic

ipat

ion*

*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

perc

entil

eSc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ileSF

O P

erce

ntile

rang

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

percent

%>=

Band

5 Sc

hool

Tr

endl

ine*

% B

and

3&4

% B

and

5%

Ban

d 6

% B

and

7&8

0255075100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010


mean scaled score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

eSt

ate

Mea

n Sc

ore

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Stud

ent P

artic

ipat

ion*

*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

perc

entil

eSc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ileSF

O P

erce

ntile

rang

e

Not

es:

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= st

uden

ts w

ho p

artic

ipat

ed in

NAP

LAN

(not

abs

ent /

with

draw

n bu

t inc

ludi

ng e

xem

pt) /

tota

l num

ber o

f stu

dent

s (in

clud

ing

exem

pt /

abse

nt /

with

draw

n).

04080120

160

200

240

2008

-10


Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

Stat

e M

ean

Gro

wth

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

-10

perc

entil

e

Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

as

perc

entil

e

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 2

9 of

59

57


NAP

LAN

Yea

r 7 a

nd 9

: Rea

ding

Scho

ol n

o:Sc

hool

nam

e:N

amel

ess

P-12

Col

lege

Sour

ce o

f dat

a: V

icto

rian

Cur

ricul

um a

nd A

sses

smen

t Aut

horit

y.Ex

plan

atio

n:Th

e N

atio

nal A

sses

smen

t Pro

gram

- Li

tera

cy a

nd N

umer

acy

(NAP

LAN

) is

cond

ucte

d ea

ch y

ear f

or s

tude

nts

in Y

ears

3, 5

, 7 a

nd 9

. Fo

r mor

e de

taile

d N

APLA

N d

ata,

refe

r to

the

NAP

LAN

Dat

a Se

rvic

ew

ebsi

te a

t http

://na

plan

ds.v

caa.

vic.

edu.

au.

A re

fere

nce

guid

e fo

r ana

lysin

g N

APLA

N d

ata

is a

vaila

ble

at h

ttp://

ww

w.v

caa.

vic.

edu.

au/v

caa/

prep

10/n

apla

n/sc

hool

s/an

alys

ingn

apla

ndat

a.pd

f.

Year

7Ye

ar 9

(n)

(%)

45

67

89

Scho

olSt

ate

(n)

(%)

56

78

910

Scho

olSt

ate

2008

1510

00

1340

2027

053

9.2

531.

120

0819

955

2637

1616

056

5.0

572.

520

0917

100

024

1841

180

533.

853

4.5

2009

2010

05

525

555

558

7.0

576.

5Sc

hool

Stat

e20

1013

100

88

4631

80

515.

754

0.6

2010

1493

77

2936

210

577.

657

0.3

2008

-10

1313

42.1

37.5

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

NAP

Ban

dPe

rcen

t of s

tude

nts

by N

AP B

and

Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

aga

inst

Sta

te M

ean

Mea

n Sc

aled

Sc

ore

Gro

wth

MC

tota

lM

C w

ith 2

sc

ores

9999

stud

ent

parti

cipa

tion*

*Pe

rcen

t of s

tude

nts

by N

AP B

and

Mea

n Sc

aled

Scor

est

uden

tpa

rtici

patio

n**

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

NAP

Ban

dM

ean

Scal

edSc

ore

Mat

ched

Coh

ort (

MC

)Ba

ndBa

ndN

umbe

r of s

tude

nts

-40

-20020406080100

percent

-40

-20020406080100

percent

Not

es:

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= st

uden

ts w

ho p

artic

ipat

ed in

NAP

LAN

(not

abs

ent /

with

draw

n bu

t inc

ludi

ng e

xem

pt) /

tota

l num

ber o

f stu

dent

s (in

clud

ing

exem

pt /

abse

nt /

with

draw

n).

6080100

ed score growth

Year

7Ye

ar 9

Scho

ol M

ean

agai

nst S

tate

Mea

n,Sc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ile a

gain

stSc

hool

Mea

n ag

ains

t Sta

te M

ean,

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

aga

inst

incl

udin

g Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge

incl

udin

g Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge

Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

as

perc

entil

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

percent

%>=

Band

6 Sc

hool

Tr

endl

ine*

% B

and

4&5

% B

and

6%

Ban

d 7

% B

and

8&9

0255075100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010


mean scaled score

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

percent

%>=

Band

7 Sc

hool

Tr

endl

ine*

% B

and

5&6

% B

and

7%

Ban

d 8

% B

and

9&10

0255075100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010


mean scaled score

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

Not

es:

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= st

uden

ts w

ho p

artic

ipat

ed in

NAP

LAN

(not

abs

ent /

with

draw

n bu

t inc

ludi

ng e

xem

pt) /

tota

l num

ber o

f stu

dent

s (in

clud

ing

exem

pt /

abse

nt /

with

draw

n).

020406080100

2008

-10


Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

Stat

e M

ean

Gro

wth

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

-10

perc

entil

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

percent

%>=

Band

6 Sc

hool

Tr

endl

ine*

% B

and

4&5

% B

and

6%

Ban

d 7

% B

and

8&9

0255075100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010


mean scaled score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

eSt

ate

Mea

n Sc

ore

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Stud

ent P

artic

ipat

ion*

*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

perc

entil

eSc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ileSF

O P

erce

ntile

rang

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

percent

%>=

Band

7 Sc

hool

Tr

endl

ine*

% B

and

5&6

% B

and

7%

Ban

d 8

% B

and

9&10

0255075100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010


mean scaled score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

eSt

ate

Mea

n Sc

ore

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Stud

ent P

artic

ipat

ion*

*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

perc

entil

eSc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ileSF

O P

erce

ntile

rang

e

Not

es:

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= st

uden

ts w

ho p

artic

ipat

ed in

NAP

LAN

(not

abs

ent /

with

draw

n bu

t inc

ludi

ng e

xem

pt) /

tota

l num

ber o

f stu

dent

s (in

clud

ing

exem

pt /

abse

nt /

with

draw

n).

020406080100

2008

-10


Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

Stat

e M

ean

Gro

wth

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

-10

perc

entil

e

Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

as

perc

entil

e

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 3

0 of

59

58


NAP

LAN

Yea

r 3 a

nd 5

: Writ

ing

Scho

ol n

o:Sc

hool

nam

e:N

amel

ess

P-12

Col

lege

Sour

ce o

f dat

a: V

icto

rian

Cur

ricul

um a

nd A

sses

smen

t Aut

horit

y.Ex

plan

atio

n:Th

e N

atio

nal A

sses

smen

t Pro

gram

- Li

tera

cy a

nd N

umer

acy

(NAP

LAN

) is

cond

ucte

d ea

ch y

ear f

or s

tude

nts

in Y

ears

3, 5

, 7 a

nd 9

. Fo

r mor

e de

taile

d N

APLA

N d

ata,

refe

r to

the

NAP

LAN

Dat

a Se

rvic

ew

ebsi

te a

t http

://na

plan

ds.v

caa.

vic.

edu.

au.

A re

fere

nce

guid

e fo

r ana

lysin

g N

APLA

N d

ata

is a

vaila

ble

at h

ttp://

ww

w.v

caa.

vic.

edu.

au/v

caa/

prep

10/n

apla

n/sc

hool

s/an

alys

ingn

apla

ndat

a.pd

f.

Year

3Ye

ar 5

(n)

(%)

12

34

56

Scho

olSt

ate

(n)

(%)

34

56

78

Scho

olSt

ate

2008

1895

00

1235

3518

429.

042

1.3

2008

1694

66

625

4413

518.

549

6.1

2009

1689

00

631

4419

438.

242

3.4

2009

2997

07

1829

2125

522.

349

1.9

Scho

olSt

ate

2010

1810

00

06

1744

3346

2.3

425.

620

1020

100

520

1515

2025

505.

849

2.5

2008

-10

1817

81.9

70.9

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

NAP

Ban

dPe

rcen

t of s

tude

nts

by N

AP B

and

Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

aga

inst

Sta

te M

ean

Mea

n Sc

aled

Sc

ore

Gro

wth

MC

tota

lM

C w

ith 2

sc

ores

9999

stud

ent

parti

cipa

tion*

*Pe

rcen

t of s

tude

nts

by N

AP B

and

Mea

n Sc

aled

Scor

est

uden

tpa

rtici

patio

n**

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

NAP

Ban

dM

ean

Scal

edSc

ore

Mat

ched

Coh

ort (

MC

)Ba

ndBa

ndN

umbe

r of s

tude

nts

-40

-20020406080100

percent

-40

-20020406080100

percent

Not

es:

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= st

uden

ts w

ho p

artic

ipat

ed in

NAP

LAN

(not

abs

ent /

with

draw

n bu

t inc

ludi

ng e

xem

pt) /

tota

l num

ber o

f stu

dent

s (in

clud

ing

exem

pt /

abse

nt /

with

draw

n).

120

160

200

ed score growth

Year

3Ye

ar 5

Scho

ol M

ean

agai

nst S

tate

Mea

n,Sc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ile a

gain

stSc

hool

Mea

n ag

ains

t Sta

te M

ean,

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

aga

inst

incl

udin

g Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge

incl

udin

g Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge

Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

as

perc

entil

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

percent

%>=

Band

3 Sc

hool

Tr

endl

ine*

% B

and

1&2

% B

and

3%

Ban

d 4

% B

and

5&6

0255075100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010


mean scaled score

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

percent

%>=

Band

5 Sc

hool

Tr

endl

ine*

% B

and

3&4

% B

and

5%

Ban

d 6

% B

and

7&8

0255075100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010


mean scaled score

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

Not

es:

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= st

uden

ts w

ho p

artic

ipat

ed in

NAP

LAN

(not

abs

ent /

with

draw

n bu

t inc

ludi

ng e

xem

pt) /

tota

l num

ber o

f stu

dent

s (in

clud

ing

exem

pt /

abse

nt /

with

draw

n).

04080120

160

200

2008

-10


Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

Stat

e M

ean

Gro

wth

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

-10

perc

entil

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

percent

%>=

Band

3 Sc

hool

Tr

endl

ine*

% B

and

1&2

% B

and

3%

Ban

d 4

% B

and

5&6

0255075100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010


mean scaled score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

eSt

ate

Mea

n Sc

ore

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Stud

ent P

artic

ipat

ion*

*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

perc

entil

eSc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ileSF

O P

erce

ntile

rang

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

percent

%>=

Band

5 Sc

hool

Tr

endl

ine*

% B

and

3&4

% B

and

5%

Ban

d 6

% B

and

7&8

0255075100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010


mean scaled score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

eSt

ate

Mea

n Sc

ore

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Stud

ent P

artic

ipat

ion*

*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

perc

entil

eSc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ileSF

O P

erce

ntile

rang

e

Not

es:

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= st

uden

ts w

ho p

artic

ipat

ed in

NAP

LAN

(not

abs

ent /

with

draw

n bu

t inc

ludi

ng e

xem

pt) /

tota

l num

ber o

f stu

dent

s (in

clud

ing

exem

pt /

abse

nt /

with

draw

n).

04080120

160

200

2008

-10


Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

Stat

e M

ean

Gro

wth

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

-10

perc

entil

e

Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

as

perc

entil

e

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 3

1 of

59

59


NAP

LAN

Yea

r 7 a

nd 9

: Writ

ing

Scho

ol n

o:Sc

hool

nam

e:N

amel

ess

P-12

Col

lege

Sour

ce o

f dat

a: V

icto

rian

Cur

ricul

um a

nd A

sses

smen

t Aut

horit

y.Ex

plan

atio

n:Th

e N

atio

nal A

sses

smen

t Pro

gram

- Li

tera

cy a

nd N

umer

acy

(NAP

LAN

) is

cond

ucte

d ea

ch y

ear f

or s

tude

nts

in Y

ears

3, 5

, 7 a

nd 9

. Fo

r mor

e de

taile

d N

APLA

N d

ata,

refe

r to

the

NAP

LAN

Dat

a Se

rvic

ew

ebsi

te a

t http

://na

plan

ds.v

caa.

vic.

edu.

au.

A re

fere

nce

guid

e fo

r ana

lysin

g N

APLA

N d

ata

is a

vaila

ble

at h

ttp://

ww

w.v

caa.

vic.

edu.

au/v

caa/

prep

10/n

apla

n/sc

hool

s/an

alys

ingn

apla

ndat

a.pd

f.

Year

7Ye

ar 9

(n)

(%)

45

67

89

Scho

olSt

ate

(n)

(%)

56

78

910

Scho

olSt

ate

2008

1510

013

733

2013

1352

4.6

534.

220

0819

955

1632

375

556

3.2

571.

820

0917

100

612

2435

1212

534.

252

6.8

2009

2010

010

1025

2525

558

3.0

566.

0Sc

hool

Stat

e20

1013

100

88

318

2323

554.

452

6.8

2010

1493

036

2121

147

574.

856

3.5

2008

-10

1313

51.7

26.5

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

NAP

Ban

dPe

rcen

t of s

tude

nts

by N

AP B

and

Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

aga

inst

Sta

te M

ean

Mea

n Sc

aled

Sc

ore

Gro

wth

MC

tota

lM

C w

ith 2

sc

ores

9999

stud

ent

parti

cipa

tion*

*Pe

rcen

t of s

tude

nts

by N

AP B

and

Mea

n Sc

aled

Scor

est

uden

tpa

rtici

patio

n**

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

NAP

Ban

dM

ean

Scal

edSc

ore

Mat

ched

Coh

ort (

MC

)Ba

ndBa

ndN

umbe

r of s

tude

nts

-40

-20020406080100

percent

-40

-20020406080100

percent

Not

es:

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= st

uden

ts w

ho p

artic

ipat

ed in

NAP

LAN

(not

abs

ent /

with

draw

n bu

t inc

ludi

ng e

xem

pt) /

tota

l num

ber o

f stu

dent

s (in

clud

ing

exem

pt /

abse

nt /

with

draw

n).

6080100

ed score growth

Year

7Ye

ar 9

Scho

ol M

ean

agai

nst S

tate

Mea

n,Sc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ile a

gain

stSc

hool

Mea

n ag

ains

t Sta

te M

ean,

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

aga

inst

incl

udin

g Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge

incl

udin

g Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge

Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

as

perc

entil

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

percent

%>=

Band

6 Sc

hool

Tr

endl

ine*

% B

and

4&5

% B

and

6%

Ban

d 7

% B

and

8&9

0255075100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010


mean scaled score

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

percent%

>=Ba

nd7

Scho

ol

Tren

dlin

e*%

Ban

d 5&

6%

Ban

d 7

% B

and

8%

Ban

d 9&

10

0255075100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010


mean scaled score

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

Not

es:

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= st

uden

ts w

ho p

artic

ipat

ed in

NAP

LAN

(not

abs

ent /

with

draw

n bu

t inc

ludi

ng e

xem

pt) /

tota

l num

ber o

f stu

dent

s (in

clud

ing

exem

pt /

abse

nt /

with

draw

n).

020406080100

2008

-10


Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

Stat

e M

ean

Gro

wth

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

-10

perc

entil

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

percent

%>=

Band

6 Sc

hool

Tr

endl

ine*

% B

and

4&5

% B

and

6%

Ban

d 7

% B

and

8&9

0255075100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010


mean scaled score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

eSt

ate

Mea

n Sc

ore

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Stud

ent P

artic

ipat

ion*

*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

perc

entil

eSc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ileSF

O P

erce

ntile

rang

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

percent%

>=Ba

nd7

Scho

ol

Tren

dlin

e*%

Ban

d 5&

6%

Ban

d 7

% B

and

8%

Ban

d 9&

10

0255075100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010


mean scaled score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

eSt

ate

Mea

n Sc

ore

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Stud

ent P

artic

ipat

ion*

*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

perc

entil

eSc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ileSF

O P

erce

ntile

rang

e

Not

es:

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= st

uden

ts w

ho p

artic

ipat

ed in

NAP

LAN

(not

abs

ent /

with

draw

n bu

t inc

ludi

ng e

xem

pt) /

tota

l num

ber o

f stu

dent

s (in

clud

ing

exem

pt /

abse

nt /

with

draw

n).

020406080100

2008

-10


Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

Stat

e M

ean

Gro

wth

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

-10

perc

entil

e

Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

as

perc

entil

e

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 3

2 of

59

60


NAP

LAN

Yea

r 3 a

nd 5

: Num

erac

ySc

hool

no:

Scho

ol n

ame:

Nam

eles

s P-

12 C

olle

geSo

urce

of d

ata:

Vic

toria

n C

urric

ulum

and

Ass

essm

ent A

utho

rity.

Expl

anat

ion:

The

Nat

iona

l Ass

essm

ent P

rogr

am -

Lite

racy

and

Num

erac

y (N

APLA

N) i

s co

nduc

ted

each

yea

r for

stu

dent

s in

Yea

rs 3

, 5, 7

and

9.

For m

ore

deta

iled

NAP

LAN

dat

a, re

fer t

o th

e N

APLA

N D

ata

Serv

ice

web

site

at h

ttp://

napl

ands

.vca

a.vi

c.ed

u.au

. A

refe

renc

e gu

ide

for a

nalys

ing

NAP

LAN

dat

a is

ava

ilabl

e at

http

://w

ww

.vca

a.vi

c.ed

u.au

/vca

a/pr

ep10

/nap

lan/

scho

ols/

anal

ysin

gnap

land

ata.

pdf.

Year

3Ye

ar 5

(n)

(%)

12

34

56

Scho

olSt

ate

(n)

(%)

34

56

78

Scho

olSt

ate

2008

1789

60

1319

3131

444.

041

6.1

2008

1694

019

3838

60

464.

148

7.8

2009

1689

00

019

4438

481.

641

0.6

2009

2997

04

1829

2921

526.

249

5.4

Scho

olSt

ate

2010

1810

00

017

3917

2842

8.0

411.

120

1020

100

1510

2545

50

464.

350

1.8

2008

-10

1816

30.9

85.8

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

NAP

Ban

dPe

rcen

t of s

tude

nts

by N

AP B

and

Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

aga

inst

Sta

te M

ean

Mea

n Sc

aled

Sc

ore

Gro

wth

MC

tota

lM

C w

ith 2

sc

ores

9999

stud

ent

parti

cipa

tion*

*Pe

rcen

t of s

tude

nts

by N

AP B

and

Mea

n Sc

aled

Scor

est

uden

tpa

rtici

patio

n**

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

NAP

Ban

dM

ean

Scal

edSc

ore

Mat

ched

Coh

ort (

MC

)Ba

ndBa

ndN

umbe

r of s

tude

nts

-40

-20020406080100

percent

-40

-20020406080100

percent

Not

es:

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= st

uden

ts w

ho p

artic

ipat

ed in

NAP

LAN

(not

abs

ent /

with

draw

n bu

t inc

ludi

ng e

xem

pt) /

tota

l num

ber o

f stu

dent

s (in

clud

ing

exem

pt /

abse

nt /

with

draw

n).

120

160

200

240

ed score growth

Year

3Ye

ar 5

Scho

ol M

ean

agai

nst S

tate

Mea

n,Sc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ile a

gain

stSc

hool

Mea

n ag

ains

t Sta

te M

ean,

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

aga

inst

incl

udin

g Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge

incl

udin

g Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge

Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

as

perc

entil

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

percent

%>=

Band

3 Sc

hool

Tr

endl

ine*

% B

and

1&2

% B

and

3%

Ban

d 4

% B

and

5&6

0255075100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010


mean scaled score

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

percent

%>=

Band

5 Sc

hool

Tr

endl

ine*

% B

and

3&4

% B

and

5%

Ban

d 6

% B

and

7&8

0255075100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010


mean scaled score

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

Not

es:

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= st

uden

ts w

ho p

artic

ipat

ed in

NAP

LAN

(not

abs

ent /

with

draw

n bu

t inc

ludi

ng e

xem

pt) /

tota

l num

ber o

f stu

dent

s (in

clud

ing

exem

pt /

abse

nt /

with

draw

n).

04080120

160

200

240

2008

-10


Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

Stat

e M

ean

Gro

wth

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

-10

perc

entil

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

percent

%>=

Band

3 Sc

hool

Tr

endl

ine*

% B

and

1&2

% B

and

3%

Ban

d 4

% B

and

5&6

0255075100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010


mean scaled score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

eSt

ate

Mea

n Sc

ore

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Stud

ent P

artic

ipat

ion*

*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

perc

entil

eSc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ileSF

O P

erce

ntile

rang

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

percent

%>=

Band

5 Sc

hool

Tr

endl

ine*

% B

and

3&4

% B

and

5%

Ban

d 6

% B

and

7&8

0255075100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010


mean scaled score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

eSt

ate

Mea

n Sc

ore

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Stud

ent P

artic

ipat

ion*

*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

perc

entil

eSc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ileSF

O P

erce

ntile

rang

e

Not

es:

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= st

uden

ts w

ho p

artic

ipat

ed in

NAP

LAN

(not

abs

ent /

with

draw

n bu

t inc

ludi

ng e

xem

pt) /

tota

l num

ber o

f stu

dent

s (in

clud

ing

exem

pt /

abse

nt /

with

draw

n).

04080120

160

200

240

2008

-10


Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

Stat

e M

ean

Gro

wth

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

-10

perc

entil

e

Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

as

perc

entil

e

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 3

3 of

59

61


NAP

LAN

Yea

r 7 a

nd 9

: Num

erac

ySc

hool

no:

Scho

ol n

ame:

Nam

eles

s P-

12 C

olle

geSo

urce

of d

ata:

Vic

toria

n C

urric

ulum

and

Ass

essm

ent A

utho

rity.

Expl

anat

ion:

The

Nat

iona

l Ass

essm

ent P

rogr

am -

Lite

racy

and

Num

erac

y (N

APLA

N) i

s co

nduc

ted

each

yea

r for

stu

dent

s in

Yea

rs 3

, 5, 7

and

9.

For m

ore

deta

iled

NAP

LAN

dat

a, re

fer t

o th

e N

APLA

N D

ata

Serv

ice

web

site

at h

ttp://

napl

ands

.vca

a.vi

c.ed

u.au

. A

refe

renc

e gu

ide

for a

nalys

ing

NAP

LAN

dat

a is

ava

ilabl

e at

http

://w

ww

.vca

a.vi

c.ed

u.au

/vca

a/pr

ep10

/nap

lan/

scho

ols/

anal

ysin

gnap

land

ata.

pdf.

Year

7Ye

ar 9

(n)

(%)

45

67

89

Scho

olSt

ate

(n)

(%)

56

78

910

Scho

olSt

ate

2008

1510

00

740

337

1355

0.3

541.

220

0819

955

1626

4211

057

0.8

579.

020

0917

100

012

2918

356

556.

753

9.1

2009

2010

00

525

4025

561

3.3

586.

4Sc

hool

Stat

e20

1013

100

031

3931

00

508.

554

2.7

2010

1493

00

6421

77

581.

758

3.4

2008

-10

1313

38.2

38.8

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

NAP

Ban

dPe

rcen

t of s

tude

nts

by N

AP B

and

Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

aga

inst

Sta

te M

ean

Mea

n Sc

aled

Sc

ore

Gro

wth

MC

tota

lM

C w

ith 2

sc

ores

9999

stud

ent

parti

cipa

tion*

*Pe

rcen

t of s

tude

nts

by N

AP B

and

Mea

n Sc

aled

Scor

est

uden

tpa

rtici

patio

n**

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

NAP

Ban

dM

ean

Scal

edSc

ore

Mat

ched

Coh

ort (

MC

)Ba

ndBa

ndN

umbe

r of s

tude

nts

-40

-20020406080100

percent

-40

-20020406080100

percent

Not

es:

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= st

uden

ts w

ho p

artic

ipat

ed in

NAP

LAN

(not

abs

ent /

with

draw

n bu

t inc

ludi

ng e

xem

pt) /

tota

l num

ber o

f stu

dent

s (in

clud

ing

exem

pt /

abse

nt /

with

draw

n).

6080100

ed score growth

Year

7Ye

ar 9

Scho

ol M

ean

agai

nst S

tate

Mea

n,Sc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ile a

gain

stSc

hool

Mea

n ag

ains

t Sta

te M

ean,

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

aga

inst

incl

udin

g Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge

incl

udin

g Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge

Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

as

perc

entil

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

percent

%>=

Band

6 Sc

hool

Tr

endl

ine*

% B

and

4&5

% B

and

6%

Ban

d 7

% B

and

8&9

0255075100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010


mean scaled score

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

percent

%>=

Band

7 Sc

hool

Tr

endl

ine*

% B

and

5&6

% B

and

7%

Ban

d 8

% B

and

9&10

0255075100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010


mean scaled score

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

perc

entil

e

Not

es:

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= st

uden

ts w

ho p

artic

ipat

ed in

NAP

LAN

(not

abs

ent /

with

draw

n bu

t inc

ludi

ng e

xem

pt) /

tota

l num

ber o

f stu

dent

s (in

clud

ing

exem

pt /

abse

nt /

with

draw

n).

020406080100

2008

-10


Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

Stat

e M

ean

Gro

wth

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

-10

perc

entil

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

percent

%>=

Band

6 Sc

hool

Tr

endl

ine*

% B

and

4&5

% B

and

6%

Ban

d 7

% B

and

8&9

0255075100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010


mean scaled score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

eSt

ate

Mea

n Sc

ore

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Stud

ent P

artic

ipat

ion*

*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

perc

entil

eSc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ileSF

O P

erce

ntile

rang

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2008

2009

2010

percent

%>=

Band

7 Sc

hool

Tr

endl

ine*

% B

and

5&6

% B

and

7%

Ban

d 8

% B

and

9&10

0255075100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010


mean scaled score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

eSt

ate

Mea

n Sc

ore

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Stud

ent P

artic

ipat

ion*

*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

perc

entil

eSc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ileSF

O P

erce

ntile

rang

e

Not

es:

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= st

uden

ts w

ho p

artic

ipat

ed in

NAP

LAN

(not

abs

ent /

with

draw

n bu

t inc

ludi

ng e

xem

pt) /

tota

l num

ber o

f stu

dent

s (in

clud

ing

exem

pt /

abse

nt /

with

draw

n).

020406080100

2008

-10


Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

Stat

e M

ean

Gro

wth

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

020

4060

8010

0

2008

-10

perc

entil

e

Scho

ol M

ean

Gro

wth

as

perc

entil

e

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 3

4 of

59

62


AIM

Yea

r 3 a

nd 5

: Rea

ding

(dis

cont

inue

d at

the

end

of 2

007)

Scho

ol n

o:Sc

hool

nam

e:N

amel

ess

P-12

Col

lege

Sour

ce o

f dat

a: V

icto

rian

Cur

ricul

um a

nd A

sses

smen

t Aut

horit

y.Ex

plan

atio

n:Th

e Ac

hiev

emen

t Im

prov

emen

t Mon

itor (

AIM

) was

a s

tate

wid

e as

sess

men

t pro

gram

con

duct

ed e

ach

year

up

until

and

incl

udin

g 20

07 fo

r stu

dent

s in

Yea

rs 3

, 5, 7

and

9.

This

has

now

bee

n re

plac

ed b

y N

APLA

N.

For m

ore

deta

iled

AIM

dat

a, re

fer t

o th

e N

APLA

N D

ata

Serv

ice

web

site

at h

ttp://

aim

ds.v

caa.

vic.

edu.

au.

Year

3Ye

ar 5

(n)

(%)*

*Le

v1Le

v2Le

v3Le

v4Le

v5Le

v6Le

v6E

Scho

olSt

ate

(n)

(%)*

*Le

v1Le

v2Le

v3Le

v4Le

v5Le

v6Le

v6E

Scho

olSt

ate

2003

2083

015

4540

00

02.

82.

320

0317

810

012

5335

00

3.8

3.2

2004

1983

526

2642

00

02.

52.

320

0416

730

056

1331

00

3.2

3.2

2005

1774

66

5335

00

02.

72.

420

0521

880

029

1457

00

3.7

3.2

2006

1368

015

6915

00

02.

42.

320

0612

710

042

3325

00

3.2

3.1

2007

2991

010

3455

00

02.

82.

320

0720

800

545

3515

00

3.1

3.2

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

VEL

S le

vel

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

VEL

S le

vel

9999

Mea

n VE

LS S

core

Mea

n VE

LS S

core

stud

ent p

artic

ipat

ion

stud

ent p

artic

ipat

ion

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

VEL

S le

vel

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

VEL

S le

vel

60-40

-20020406080100

percent

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= (s

tude

nts

who

parti

cipa

ted

in A

IM /

Feb

enro

lmen

ts) *

100

60-40

-20020406080100

percent

Not

es:

Year

3Ye

ar 5

Scho

ol M

ean

agai

nst S

tate

Mea

n,Sc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ile a

gain

stSc

hool

Mea

n ag

ains

t Sta

te M

ean,

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

aga

inst

incl

udin

g Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge

incl

udin

g Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

percent

% >

=Lev

3 Sc

hool

Tre

ndlin

e*%

Lev

1%

Lev

2%

Lev

3%

>=L

ev4

0255075100

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

percent student participation

mean VELS score

Scho

olM

ean

Scor

eSt

ate

Mea

nSc

ore

020

4060

8010

0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2004

-20

07

perc

entil

e

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= (s

tude

nts

who

parti

cipa

ted

in A

IM /

Feb

enro

lmen

ts) *

100

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

percent

% >

=Lev

4 Sc

hool

Tre

ndlin

e*%

<=L

ev2

% L

ev3

% L

ev4

% >

=Lev

5

0255075100

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007


mean VELS score

Sh

lMS

Stt

MS

020

4060

8010

0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2004

-20

07

perc

entil

e

Not

es:

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

percent

% >

=Lev

3 Sc

hool

Tre

ndlin

e*%

Lev

1%

Lev

2%

Lev

3%

>=L

ev4

0255075100

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007


mean VELS score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

eSt

ate

Mea

n Sc

ore

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Stud

ent P

artic

ipat

ion*

*

020

4060

8010

0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2004

-20

07

perc

entil

e

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

SFO

Per

cent

ile ra

nge

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= (s

tude

nts

who

parti

cipa

ted

in A

IM /

Feb

enro

lmen

ts) *

100

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

percent

% >

=Lev

4 Sc

hool

Tre

ndlin

e*%

<=L

ev2

% L

ev3

% L

ev4

% >

=Lev

5

0255075100

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007


mean VELS score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

eSt

ate

Mea

n Sc

ore

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Stud

ent P

artic

ipat

ion*

*

020

4060

8010

0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2004

-20

07

perc

entil

eSc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ileSF

O P

erce

ntile

rang

e

Not

es:

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 3

5 of

59

63


AIM

Yea

r 7 a

nd 9

: Rea

ding

(dis

cont

inue

d at

the

end

of 2

007)

Scho

ol n

o:Sc

hool

nam

e:N

amel

ess

P-12

Col

lege

Sour

ce o

f dat

a: V

icto

rian

Cur

ricul

um a

nd A

sses

smen

t Aut

horit

y.Ex

plan

atio

n:Th

e Ac

hiev

emen

t Im

prov

emen

t Mon

itor (

AIM

) was

a s

tate

wid

e as

sess

men

t pro

gram

con

duct

ed e

ach

year

up

until

and

incl

udin

g 20

07 fo

r stu

dent

s in

Yea

rs 3

, 5, 7

and

9.

This

has

now

bee

n re

plac

ed b

y N

APLA

N.

For m

ore

deta

iled

AIM

dat

a, re

fer t

o th

e N

APLA

N D

ata

Serv

ice

web

site

at h

ttp://

aim

ds.v

caa.

vic.

edu.

au.

Year

7Ye

ar 9

(n)

(%)*

*Le

v1Le

v2Le

v3Le

v4Le

v5Le

v6Le

v6E

Scho

olSt

ate

(n)

(%)*

*Le

v1Le

v2Le

v3Le

v4Le

v5Le

v6Le

v6E

Scho

olSt

ate

2003

2385

00

039

3526

04.

34.

120

0320

0411

920

00

1855

270

4.5

4.2

2004

2005

1694

00

631

3131

04.

44.

220

0520

0618

860

017

2839

170

4.2

4.2

2006

1510

00

00

2047

277

4.8

5.1

2007

1579

00

020

5327

04.

54.

120

0717

850

00

012

5335

5.7

5.1

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

VEL

S le

vel

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

VEL

S le

vel

Mea

n VE

LS S

core

9999

stud

ent p

artic

ipat

ion

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

VEL

S le

vel

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

VEL

S le

vel

Mea

n VE

LS S

core

stud

ent p

artic

ipat

ion

60-40

-20020406080100

percent

60-40

-20020406080100

percent

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= (s

tude

nts

who

parti

cipa

ted

in A

IM /

Feb

enro

lmen

ts) *

100

Not

es:

Year

7Ye

ar 9

Scho

ol M

ean

agai

nst S

tate

Mea

n,Sc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ile a

gain

stSc

hool

Mea

n ag

ains

t Sta

te M

ean,

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

aga

inst

incl

udin

g Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge

incl

udin

g Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

percent

% >

=Lev

5 Sc

hool

Tre

ndlin

e*%

<=L

ev3

% L

ev4

% L

ev5

% >

=Lev

6

0255075100

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007


mean VELS score

Scho

olM

ean

Scor

eSt

ate

Mea

nSc

ore

020

4060

8010

0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2004

-20

07

perc

entil

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

percent

% >

=Lev

6 Sc

hool

Tre

ndlin

e*%

<=L

ev4

% L

ev5

% L

ev6

% L

ev6E

0255075100

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007


mean VELS score

Sh

lMS

Stt

MS

020

4060

8010

0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2004

-20

07

perc

entil

e

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= (s

tude

nts

who

parti

cipa

ted

in A

IM /

Feb

enro

lmen

ts) *

100

Not

es:

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

percent

% >

=Lev

5 Sc

hool

Tre

ndlin

e*%

<=L

ev3

% L

ev4

% L

ev5

% >

=Lev

6

0255075100

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007


mean VELS score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

eSt

ate

Mea

n Sc

ore

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Stud

ent P

artic

ipat

ion*

*

020

4060

8010

0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2004

-20

07

perc

entil

eSc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ileSF

O P

erce

ntile

rang

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

percent

% >

=Lev

6 Sc

hool

Tre

ndlin

e*%

<=L

ev4

% L

ev5

% L

ev6

% L

ev6E

0255075100

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007


mean VELS score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

eSt

ate

Mea

n Sc

ore

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Stud

ent P

artic

ipat

ion*

*

020

4060

8010

0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2004

-20

07

perc

entil

eSc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ileSF

O P

erce

ntile

rang

e

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= (s

tude

nts

who

parti

cipa

ted

in A

IM /

Feb

enro

lmen

ts) *

100

Not

es:

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 3

6 of

59

64


AIM

Yea

r 3 a

nd 5

: Num

ber (

disc

ontin

ued

at th

e en

d of

200

7)Sc

hool

no:

Scho

ol n

ame:

Nam

eles

s P-

12 C

olle

geSo

urce

of d

ata:

Vic

toria

n C

urric

ulum

and

Ass

essm

ent A

utho

rity.

Expl

anat

ion:

The

Achi

evem

ent I

mpr

ovem

ent M

onito

r (AI

M) w

as a

sta

tew

ide

asse

ssm

ent p

rogr

am c

ondu

cted

eac

h ye

ar u

p un

til a

nd in

clud

ing

2007

for s

tude

nts

in Y

ears

3, 5

, 7 a

nd 9

. Th

is h

as n

ow b

een

repl

aced

by

NAP

LAN

.Fo

r mor

e de

taile

d AI

M d

ata,

refe

r to

the

NAP

LAN

Dat

a Se

rvic

e w

ebsi

te a

t http

://ai

mds

.vca

a.vi

c.ed

u.au

.

Year

3Ye

ar 5

(n)

(%)*

*Le

v1Le

v2Le

v3Le

v4Le

v5Le

v6Le

v6E

Scho

olSt

ate

(n)

(%)*

*Le

v1Le

v2Le

v3Le

v4Le

v5Le

v6Le

v6E

Scho

olSt

ate

2003

1979

011

5337

00

02.

82.

420

0319

900

032

635

00

3.2

3.1

2004

2087

015

5035

00

02.

62.

420

0414

640

750

430

00

2.7

3.2

2005

1878

622

4428

00

02.

52.

420

0521

880

533

3329

00

3.4

3.2

2006

1368

08

6923

00

02.

42.

420

0611

650

027

4527

00

3.4

3.2

2007

2888

47

5039

00

02.

62.

420

0722

880

1445

329

00

2.8

3.2

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

VEL

S le

vel

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

VEL

S le

vel

Mea

n VE

LS S

core

9999

stud

ent p

artic

ipat

ion

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

VEL

S le

vel

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

VEL

S le

vel

Mea

n VE

LS S

core

stud

ent p

artic

ipat

ion

60-40

-20020406080100

percent

60-40

-20020406080100

percent

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= (s

tude

nts

who

parti

cipa

ted

in A

IM /

Feb

enro

lmen

ts) *

100

Not

es:

Year

3Ye

ar 5

Scho

ol M

ean

agai

nst S

tate

Mea

n,Sc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ile a

gain

stSc

hool

Mea

n ag

ains

t Sta

te M

ean,

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

aga

inst

incl

udin

g Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge

incl

udin

g Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

percent

% >

=Lev

3 Sc

hool

Tre

ndlin

e*%

Lev

1%

Lev

2%

Lev

3%

>=L

ev4

0255075100

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007


mean VELS score

Scho

olM

ean

Scor

eSt

ate

Mea

nSc

ore

020

4060

8010

0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2004

-20

07

perc

entil

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

percent

% >

=Lev

4 Sc

hool

Tre

ndlin

e*%

<=L

ev2

% L

ev3

% L

ev4

% >

=Lev

5

0255075100

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007


mean VELS score

Sh

lMS

Stt

MS

020

4060

8010

0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2004

-20

07

perc

entil

e

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= (s

tude

nts

who

parti

cipa

ted

in A

IM /

Feb

enro

lmen

ts) *

100

Not

es:

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

percent

% >

=Lev

3 Sc

hool

Tre

ndlin

e*%

Lev

1%

Lev

2%

Lev

3%

>=L

ev4

0255075100

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007


mean VELS score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

eSt

ate

Mea

n Sc

ore

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Stud

ent P

artic

ipat

ion*

*

020

4060

8010

0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2004

-20

07

perc

entil

e

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

SFO

Per

cent

ile ra

nge

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

percent

% >

=Lev

4 Sc

hool

Tre

ndlin

e*%

<=L

ev2

% L

ev3

% L

ev4

% >

=Lev

5

0255075100

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007


mean VELS score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

eSt

ate

Mea

n Sc

ore

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Stud

ent P

artic

ipat

ion*

*

020

4060

8010

0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2004

-20

07

perc

entil

eSc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ileSF

O P

erce

ntile

rang

e

* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

% s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

= (s

tude

nts

who

parti

cipa

ted

in A

IM /

Feb

enro

lmen

ts) *

100

Not

es:

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 3

7 of

59

65


AIM

Yea

r 7 a

nd 9

: Mat

hem

atic

s (d

isco

ntin

ued

at th

e en

d of

200

7)Sc

hool

no:

Scho

ol n

ame:

Nam

eles

s P-

12 C

olle

geSo

urce

of d

ata:

Vic

toria

n C

urric

ulum

and

Ass

essm

ent A

utho

rity.

Expl

anat

ion:

The

Achi

evem

ent I

mpr

ovem

ent M

onito

r (AI

M) w

as a

sta

tew

ide

asse

ssm

ent p

rogr

am c

ondu

cted

eac

h ye

ar u

p un

til a

nd in

clud

ing

2007

for s

tude

nts

in Y

ears

3, 5

, 7 a

nd 9

. Th

is h

as n

ow b

een

repl

aced

by

NAP

LAN

.Fo

r mor

e de

taile

d AI

M d

ata,

refe

r to

the

NAP

LAN

Dat

a Se

rvic

e w

ebsi

te a

t http

://ai

mds

.vca

a.vi

c.ed

u.au

.

Year

7Ye

ar 9

(n)

(%)*

*Le

v1Le

v2Le

v3Le

v4Le

v5Le

v6Le

v6E

Scho

olSt

ate

(n)

(%)*

*Le

v1Le

v2Le

v3Le

v4Le

v5Le

v6Le

v6E

Scho

olSt

ate

2003

2489

00

429

4225

04.

34.

020

0320

0411

920

09

4527

180

4.1

4.0

2004

2005

1710

00

012

2947

120

4.1

4.0

2005

2006

1990

00

1626

580

04.

04.

020

0615

100

00

020

6020

04.

64.

820

0715

790

013

1353

200

4.4

4.1

2007

1995

00

011

2153

165.

24.

8

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

VEL

S le

vel

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

VEL

S le

vel

9999

stud

ent p

artic

ipat

ion

Mea

n VE

LS S

core

stud

ent p

artic

ipat

ion

Mea

n VE

LS S

core

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

VEL

S le

vel

Perc

ent o

f stu

dent

s by

VEL

S le

vel

60-40

-20020406080100

percent

60-40

-20020406080100

percent

Year

7Ye

ar 9

Scho

ol M

ean

agai

nst S

tate

Mea

n,Sc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ile a

gain

stSc

hool

Mea

n ag

ains

t Sta

te M

ean,

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

aga

inst

incl

udin

g Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge

incl

udin

g Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

percent

% >

=Lev

5 Sc

hool

Tre

ndlin

e*%

<=L

ev3

% L

ev4

% L

ev5

% >

=Lev

6

0255075100

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007


mean VELS score

Scho

olM

ean

Scor

eSt

ate

Mea

nSc

ore

020

4060

8010

0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2004

-20

07

perc

entil

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

percent

% >

=Lev

6 Sc

hool

Tre

ndlin

e*%

<=L

ev4

% L

ev5

% L

ev6

% L

ev6E

0255075100

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007


mean VELS score

Sh

lMS

Stt

MS

020

4060

8010

0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2004

-20

07

perc

entil

e

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

percent

% >

=Lev

5 Sc

hool

Tre

ndlin

e*%

<=L

ev3

% L

ev4

% L

ev5

% >

=Lev

6

0255075100

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007


mean VELS score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

eSt

ate

Mea

n Sc

ore

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Stud

ent P

artic

ipat

ion*

*

020

4060

8010

0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2004

-20

07

perc

entil

e

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

SFO

Per

cent

ile ra

nge

-100-80

-60

-40

-20020406080100

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

percent

% >

=Lev

6 Sc

hool

Tre

ndlin

e*%

<=L

ev4

% L

ev5

% L

ev6

% L

ev6E

0255075100

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007


mean VELS score

Scho

ol M

ean

Scor

eSt

ate

Mea

n Sc

ore

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Stud

ent P

artic

ipat

ion*

*

020

4060

8010

0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2004

-20

07

perc

entil

eSc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ileSF

O P

erce

ntile

rang

e

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 3

8 of

59

66


VCESchool no: 9999School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeExplanation: Only 2010 studies, which at least 1 student completed, are included.Source of data: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority.Notes:- After allstudy, English, Further Maths and Maths Methods (CAS), studies are listed in descending order of the number of students in the latest year.- VET study scores are included.- Data is based on 'reported' study scores, not 'achieved' study scores.

No.

of s

tude

nts

scho

ol m

ean

No.

of s

tude

nts

scho

ol m

ean

No.

of s

tude

nts

scho

ol m

ean

No.

of s

tude

nts

scho

ol m

ean

No.

of s

tude

nts

scho

ol m

ean

allstudy 73 32.0 90 28.6 78 30.9 68 28.8 90 29.8

English EN01 14 30.5 14 26.6 16 31.1 10 24.8 15 27.9Further Mathematics MA07 6 28.0 5 25.8 6 26.3 8 25.6 11 33.6Mathematical Methods (CAS) MA11* 5 28.8 * 'Mathematical Methods MA08' was discontinued in 2010. See the 2009 School Level Report for historical MA08 data.Biology BI03 3 33.3 2 32.5 5 30.4 9 30.8Health & Human Dev. HH03 8 29.6 9 29.4 8 28.5 8 30.4Chemistry CH03 2 31.0 3 22.3 4 29.0 1 33.0 6 28.2Physical Ed. PE03 3 28.7 6 29.5 5 30.8 4 27.3 6 29.5Literature LI01 2 32.5 7 25.9 2 25.5 2 24.5 4 28.8Physics PH03 1 39.0 2 26.0 3 30.3 1 34.0 4 27.5Studio Arts SA03 6 31.2 7 29.3 3 24.7 5 24.4 4 23.5Visual Communication & Design VC03 3 29.7 4 24.8 4 31.5Australian History HI08 4 35.0 2 22.0 2 33.0 1 28.0 3 31.0IT Applications IT02 2 30.0 5 36.2 6 33.2 3 28.3Music (VCE VET) MI07 3 38.7 5 26.6 2 35.5Music Industry (Tech Prod) (VCE VET) MI09 1 21.0 2 30.5Psychology PY03 2 30.5Information Technology (VCE VET) IN21 1 36.0 1 36.0 1 41.0Software Development IT03 1 39.0 1 38.0 1 27.0

20102006 2007 2008 2009


67


VCE

Scho

ol n

o:99

99Sc

hool

nam

e:N

amel

ess

P-12

Col

lege

Sour

ce o

f dat

a:Vi

ctor

ian

Cur

ricul

um a

nd A

sses

smen

t Aut

horit

y.Sc

hool

Mea

n ag

ains

t Sta

te M

ean

Scho

olM

ean

aspe

rcen

tile

agai

nstS

FOpe

rcen

tile

rang

e

2025303540

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

allst

udy

Engl

ish

EN01

Furth

er M

athe

mat

ics

MA0

7M

athe

mat

ical

M

etho

ds (C

AS)

MA1

1**

Biol

ogy

BI03

Heal

th &

Hum

an D

ev.

HH03

Chem

istry

CH0

3Ph

ysic

al E

d. P

E03

Lite

ratu

re L

I01

Phys

ics

PH03

Stud

io A

rts S

A03

Visu

al

Com

mun

icat

ion

& De

sign

VC0

3

study score

Scho

ol M

ean

Stat

e M

ean

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

* The

sch

ool t

rend

line

is o

nly

plot

ted

when

ther

e is

dat

a fo

r eac

h ca

lend

ar y

ear.

-Afte

r alls

tudy

, EN0

1, M

A07

and

MA1

1, th

e re

mai

ning

stu

dies

are

cha

rted

in o

rder

of t

he n

umbe

r of s

tude

nts

who

com

plet

ed th

at s

tudy

in 2

010,

from

hig

hest

to lo

west

.-V

ET s

tudy

sco

res

are

incl

uded

.-D

ata

is b

ased

on

'repo

rted'

stu

dy s

core

s, n

ot th

e 'a

chie

ved'

stud

y sc

ores

.**

'Mat

hem

atica

l Met

hods

MA0

8' w

as d

isco

ntin

ued

in 2

010.

See

the

2009

Sch

ool L

evel

Rep

ort f

or h

isto

rical

MA0

8 da

ta.

Note

s:

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 4

0 of

59

Scho

olM

ean

as p

erce

ntile

aga

inst

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge

2025303540

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

allst

udy

Engl

ish

EN01

Furth

er M

athe

mat

ics

MA0

7M

athe

mat

ical

M

etho

ds (C

AS)

MA1

1**

Biol

ogy

BI03

Heal

th &

Hum

an D

ev.

HH03

Chem

istry

CH0

3Ph

ysic

al E

d. P

E03

Lite

ratu

re L

I01

Phys

ics

PH03

Stud

io A

rts S

A03

Visu

al

Com

mun

icat

ion

& De

sign

VC0

3

study score

Scho

ol M

ean

Stat

e M

ean

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

* The

sch

ool t

rend

line

is o

nly

plot

ted

when

ther

e is

dat

a fo

r eac

h ca

lend

ar y

ear.

-Afte

r alls

tudy

, EN0

1, M

A07

and

MA1

1, th

e re

mai

ning

stu

dies

are

cha

rted

in o

rder

of t

he n

umbe

r of s

tude

nts

who

com

plet

ed th

at s

tudy

in 2

010,

from

hig

hest

to lo

west

.-V

ET s

tudy

sco

res

are

incl

uded

.-D

ata

is b

ased

on

'repo

rted'

stu

dy s

core

s, n

ot th

e 'a

chie

ved'

stud

y sc

ores

.**

'Mat

hem

atica

l Met

hods

MA0

8' w

as d

isco

ntin

ued

in 2

010.

See

the

2009

Sch

ool L

evel

Rep

ort f

or h

isto

rical

MA0

8 da

ta.

Note

s:

020

4060

8010

0

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

-20

10

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

-20

10

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

-20

10

allstudy English EN01Further Mathematics

MA07

perc

entile

020

4060

8010

0

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

-20

10

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

-20

10

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

-20

10

Mathematical Methods (CAS) MA11** Biology BI03

Health & Human Dev. HH03

perc

entile

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

020

4060

8010

0

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

-20

10

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

-20

10

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

-20

10

Chemistry CH03 Physical Ed. PE03 Literature LI01

perc

entile

020

4060

8010

0

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

-20

10

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

-20

10

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

-20

10

Physics PH03 Studio Arts SA03Visual Communication

& Design VC03

perc

entile

SFO

Per

cent

ile ra

nge

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 4

0 of

59

68


VCE

(con

t'd)

Scho

ol n

o:99

99Sc

hool

nam

e:N

amel

ess

P-12

Col

lege

Sour

ce o

f dat

a:Vi

ctor

ian

Cur

ricul

um a

nd A

sses

smen

t Aut

horit

y.Sc

hool

Mea

n ag

ains

t Sta

te M

ean

Scho

olM

ean

aspe

rcen

tile

agai

nstS

FOpe

rcen

tile

rang

e

2025303540

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

Aust

ralia

n Hi

stor

y HI

08IT

App

licat

ions

IT02

Mus

ic (V

CE V

ET)

MI0

7M

usic

Indu

stry

(Tec

h Pr

od) (

VCE

VET)

M

I09

Psyc

holo

gy P

Y03

Info

rmat

ion

Tech

nolo

gy (V

CE

VET)

IN21

Softw

are

Deve

lopm

ent I

T03

study score

Scho

ol M

ean

Stat

e M

ean

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Note

s:* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.-A

fter a

llstu

dy, E

N01,

MA0

7 an

d M

A11,

the

rem

aini

ng s

tudi

es a

re c

harte

d in

ord

er o

f the

num

ber o

f stu

dent

s wh

o co

mpl

eted

that

stu

dy in

201

0, fr

om h

ighe

st to

lowe

st.

-VET

stu

dy s

core

s ar

e in

clud

ed.

-Dat

a is

bas

ed o

n 're

porte

d' s

tudy

sco

res,

not

the

'ach

ieve

d' st

udy

scor

es.

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 4

1 of

59

Scho

olM

ean

as p

erce

ntile

aga

inst

SFO

per

cent

ile ra

nge

2025303540

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

20062007200820092010

Aust

ralia

n Hi

stor

y HI

08IT

App

licat

ions

IT02

Mus

ic (V

CE V

ET)

MI0

7M

usic

Indu

stry

(Tec

h Pr

od) (

VCE

VET)

M

I09

Psyc

holo

gy P

Y03

Info

rmat

ion

Tech

nolo

gy (V

CE

VET)

IN21

Softw

are

Deve

lopm

ent I

T03

study score

Scho

ol M

ean

Stat

e M

ean

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

020

4060

8010

0

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

-20

10

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

-20

10

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

-20

10

Australian History HI08 IT Applications IT02Music (VCE VET)

MI07

perc

entile

020

4060

8010

0

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

-20

10

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

-20

10

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

-20

10

Music Industry (Tech Prod) (VCE VET) MI09 Psychology PY03

Information Technology (VCE

VET) IN21

perc

entile

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

020

4060

8010

0

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

-20

10

Software Development IT03

perc

entile

020

4060

8010

0pe

rcen

tileSF

O P

erce

ntile

rang

e

Note

s:* T

he s

choo

l tre

ndlin

e is

onl

y pl

otte

d wh

en th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.-A

fter a

llstu

dy, E

N01,

MA0

7 an

d M

A11,

the

rem

aini

ng s

tudi

es a

re c

harte

d in

ord

er o

f the

num

ber o

f stu

dent

s wh

o co

mpl

eted

that

stu

dy in

201

0, fr

om h

ighe

st to

lowe

st.

-VET

stu

dy s

core

s ar

e in

clud

ed.

-Dat

a is

bas

ed o

n 're

porte

d' s

tudy

sco

res,

not

the

'ach

ieve

d' st

udy

scor

es.

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 4

1 of

59

69


VCE: Study Scores of 40 or moreSchool no: 9999School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeExplanation: Of all VCE study scores, the percentage that were 40 or more.Source of data: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority.

State (all govt schools)

Year Total study scores % 40 or more* % 40 or more2002 90 4.4 6.02003 104 10.6 5.92004 90 11.1 6.02005 81 2.5 6.12006 73 6.8 6.02007 90 3.3 6.12008 78 10.3 5.92009 68 4.4 5.92010 90 6.7 5.9

School

8

10

12

t

VCE percentage of study scores of 40 or more*, 2002 to 2010


Note:* Prior to 2005, this data may not match the information published in The Age . Data presented on this pageprior to 2005 does not include study scores from the small number of VET studies that are given study scores.- From 2005, VET study scores are included.- From 2005, data is based on 'reported' study scores, not 'achieved' study scores.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

perc

ent

VCE percentage of study scores of 40 or more*, 2002 to 2010

School State (all govt schools)


70


VETSchool no: 9999School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeSource of data: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority.

More detailed information is available on the VASS system provided by VCAA.

Participation CompletionSchool State School State

YearYearLevel

No. students undertaking at least 1 UOC1

% students2

undertaking at least 1 UOC1

UOCs1

undertakenper student3

% students2

undertaking at least 1 UOC1

Avg no. UOCs1

undertaken per student3

No. UOCs1 withsatisfactory

result

% UOCs1 with satisfactory

result

% UOCs1 with satisfactory

result2006 10 14 65.4 14.9 209 100

11 19 86.4 13.4 242 95.312 2 14.4 11.5 23 100

10-12 35 61.1 13.9 23.0 12.0 474 97.5 75.62007 10 5 31.3 14.6 73 100

11 10 51.5 7.1 52 73.212 6 35.3 10.3 42 67.7

10-12 21 40.1 9.8 23.8 11.7 167 81.1 76.42008 10 19 86.4 7.6 132 91.7

11 11 57.9 7.8 86 10012 5 28.7 11.2 56 100

10-12 35 59.9 8.2 24.6 12.0 274 95.8 76.72009 10 3 18.8 12.7 38 100

11 6 30 25.5 153 10012 6 50 13.8 59 71.1

10-12 15 31.3 18.3 25.1 11.8 250 91.2 78.92010 10 16 80 9.8 123 78.8

11 5 33.3 11 36 65.412 3 20 29.7 31 34.8

10-12 24 48 12.5 26.1 11.5 190 63.3 81.0Participation - % Yr10-12 students2 undertaking at least 1 UOC1

School against State School as percentile

80

100

t

2006

2007

* - The school trendline is only plotted when there is data foreach calendar year.

1 - UOC = Unit(s) of Competence.2 - % students based on yr10, 11 & 12 August enrolments.3 - Only includes students undertaking at least 1 UOC.

Notes:

Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD Page 43 of 59

Avg no. UOCs1 undertaken per student3

School Mean against State Mean School Mean as percentile

Completion - % UOCs1 with satisfactory resultSchool against State School as percentile

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

perc

ent

0

5

10

15

20

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

no. o

f UO

Cs1

per

stud

ent3

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

perc

ent

School State Mean School Trendline*

0 20 40 60 80 100

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007-2010

percentile

0 20 40 60 80 100

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007-2010

percentile

0 20 40 60 80 100

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007-2010

percentileSchool as percentile



Notes:

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

perc

ent

0

5

10

15

20

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

no. o

f UO

Cs1

per

stud

ent3

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

perc

ent


0 20 40 60 80 100

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007-2010

percentile

0 20 40 60 80 100

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007-2010

percentile

0 20 40 60 80 100

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007-2010




Notes:


71


VCALSchool no: 9999School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeExplanation: 'No. of VCAL credits undertaken' is calculated by summing the number of credits undertaken

by each VCAL student across all VCAL students.The data contained in this page is for all VCAL strands and levels combined.

Source of data: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority.More detailed information is available on the VASS system provided by VCAA.

Participation CompletionSchool State School State

YearYearLevel

No.students1

No. students undertaking

VCAL

% students1

undertakingVCAL

% students1

undertakingVCAL

No. VCAL unit credits undertaken

% satisfactory completion of VCAL credits

% satisfactory completion of VCAL credits

2006 11-12 35.9 24 66.8 11.5 165 93.3 77.7

2007 11-12 36.4 15 41.2 12.0 90 100.0 76.5

2008 11-12 36.4 16 44.0 12.7 61 100.0 75.8

2009 11-12 32 2 6.3 14.1 14 100.0 76.22010 11-12 15 7 46.7 15.5 28 75.0 82.5

Participation - % Yr11-12 students1 undertaking VCALSchool against State School as percentile

Completion - % satisfactory completion of VCAL creditsSchool against State School as percentile

* - The school trendline is only plotted whenthere is data for each calendar year.

1 - No. and % students based on yr11 & 12August enrolments.

Notes:

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

perc

ent

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

perc

ent


0 20 40 60 80 100

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007-2010

percentile

0 20 40 60 80 100

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007-2010



72


Teacher Assessment of Student Progress (PSD students)School no: 9999School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeExplanation: Teachers assess their students' progress against the 8 VELS Domains using

a 6-point scale (students in special schools and those who cannot be assessedagainst the VELS).

Source of data: Data transmitted from school to DEECD via an online web-form.

Noprogress

Littleprogress

Satisfactoryprogress

Goodprogress

Very good progress

Excellentprogress

Total students assessed 1

(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (no.)2006English 5 7 35 35 13 5 10Mathematics 3 10 31 29 15 12 10Science 1 12 30 24 20 13 10ICT 4 8 28 37 18 5 10The Arts 3 11 36 24 10 16 10H&PE 1 13 31 30 13 12 10Civics & Citizenship 4 15 34 32 11 4 102007English 4 15 34 32 11 4 10Mathematics 5 7 35 35 13 5 10Science 3 10 31 29 15 12 10ICT 1 12 30 24 20 13 10The Arts 4 8 28 37 18 5 10H&PE 3 11 36 24 10 16 10Civics & Citizenship 1 13 31 30 13 12 102008English 1 13 31 30 13 12 10Mathematics 4 15 34 32 11 4 10Science 5 7 35 35 13 5 10ICT 3 10 31 29 15 12 10The Arts 1 12 30 24 20 13 10H&PE 4 8 28 37 18 5 10Civics & Citizenship 3 11 36 24 10 16 102009English 3 11 36 24 10 16 10Mathematics 1 13 31 30 13 12 10Science 4 15 34 32 11 4 10ICT 5 7 35 35 13 5 10The Arts 3 10 31 29 15 12 10H&PE 1 12 30 24 20 13 10Civics & Citizenship 4 8 28 37 18 5 102010English 4 8 28 37 18 5 10Mathematics 3 11 36 24 10 16 10Science 1 13 31 30 13 12 10ICT 4 15 34 32 11 4 10The Arts 5 7 35 35 13 5 10H&PE 3 10 31 29 15 12 10Civics & Citizenship 1 12 30 24 20 13 10

2009 Pri/Sec state benchmarks*English 4 36 36 11 14Mathematics 4 36 32 14 14Science 4 29 32 21 14ICT 4 18 43 21 7 7The Arts 4 14 18 54 11H&PE 3 14 17 41 7 17Civics & Citizenship 21 33 42 4

Notes: 1 If schools provided percentages only, it is not possible to report the number of students assessed.In these cases, the total percentage (100) will be shown.

* 2010 benchmarks will be calculated in August, when data from all schools has been submitted.


73


Teacher Assessment of Student Progress (PSD students)School no: 9999School name: Nameless P-12 College

Note: * 2010 benchmarks will be calculated inAugust, when data from all schools hasbeen submitted.

0

20

40

60

80

100

Noprogress

Little Satisfact. Good V. good Excellentprogress

percent Mathematics

0

20

40

60

80

100

Noprogress


percent Science

0

20

40

60

80

100

Noprogress


percent ICT

0

20

40

60

80

100

Noprogress


percent The Arts

0

20

40

60

80

100

Noprogress


percent H&PE

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2009 Pri/Sec state benchmarks*

0

20

40

60

80

100

Noprogress


percent Civics & Citizenship

0

20

40

60

80

100

Noprogress


percent English


74


EnrolmentsSchool no: 9999School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeExplanation: Enrolments at February census.Source of data: February census.

Year boys girls total boys girls total boys girls total1997 140 116 256 12 10 22 10 8 181998 136 127 263 12 17 29 12 14 261999 134 132 266 15 11 26 7 11 182000 134 142 276 14 11 25 11 10 212001 133 140 273 6 12 18 12 11 232002 143 140 283 10 8 18 11 9 202003 138 136 274 9 8 17 12 9 212004 140 138 278 10 13 23 10 8 182005 146 127 272 13 8 21 11 6 172006 155 121 276 14 8 22 11 10 212007 153 121 274 12 10 22 10 9 192008 152 115 266 11 12 23 8 7 152009 144 106 250 9 14 23 12 6 182010 146 109 255 16 13 29 6 8 14

Total school enrolment Prep enrolment Year 7 enrolments

0

50

100

150

200

250

300Total school enrolments by gender total

boysgirls


0

50

100

150

200

250

300

1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009

Total school enrolments by gender totalboysgirls

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009

Prep enrolments by gender totalboysgirls

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009

Year 7 enrolments by gender totalboysgirls


75


App

aren

t Stu

dent

Ret

entio

nN

ote:

Scho

ol n

o:Sc

hool

nam

e:N

amel

ess

P-12

Col

lege

Expl

anat

ion:

Appa

rent

rete

ntio

n ra

tes

are

base

d on

enr

olm

ents

. Fo

r exa

mpl

e, Y

ear 7

Feb-

12Au

g ap

pare

nt re

tent

ion

refe

rs to

yea

r 12

enro

lmen

tof

stu

dent

s in

full-

time

scho

ol e

duca

tion

in A

ugus

t exp

ress

ed a

s a

perc

enta

ge o

f yea

r 7 e

nrol

men

ts in

Feb

ruar

y fiv

e ye

ars

earli

er.

Sour

ce o

f dat

a:Fe

brua

ry a

nd A

ugus

t cen

sus.

Year

7 (F

eb) -

10

(Aug

)Sc

hool

aga

inst

Sta

te

Sc

hool

as

perc

entil

eC

ohor

ts:

AB

CD

EF

GH

Year

720

0020

0120

0220

0320

0420

0520

0620

07Ye

ar 1

020

0320

0420

0520

0620

0720

0820

0920

10Ye

ar 7

(Feb

)no

.21

2320

2712

1721

19Ye

ar 1

0 (A

ug)

no.

2319

1921

.416

2216

20Ye

ar 7

(Feb

) - 1

0 (A

ug)

%10

9.5

82.6

95.0

79.3

133.

312

9.4

76.2

105.

3St

ate

med

ian

%94

.594

.694

.393

.694

.293

.594

.897

.7

Year

10

(Aug

) - 1

1 (F

eb)

Coh

orts

:A

BC

DE

FG

Year

10

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Year

11

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Year

10

(Aug

)no

.23

1919

21.4

1622

16Ye

ar 1

1 (F

eb)

no.

2017

.924

23.1

1621

14Ye

ar10

(Aug

)11

(Feb

)%

870

942

126

310

79

100

095

587

5

9999

60708090100

AB

CD

EF

GH

percent

coho

rt

708090100

percent

020

4060

8010

0

A B C D E F G H

perc

entil

e

cohort A B C D E F Gcohort

* The

sch

ool t

rend

line

is o

nly

plot

ted

when

ther

e is

dat

a fo

r eac

h ca

lend

ar y

ear.

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 4

8 of

59

Year

10(A

ug) -

11

(Feb

)%

87.0

94.2

126.

310

7.9

100.

095

.587

.5St

ate

med

ian

%93

.893

.293

.392

.891

.592

.392

.4

Year

11

(Feb

) - 1

2 (A

ug)

Coh

orts

:A

BC

DE

FYe

ar 1

120

0420

0520

0620

0720

0820

09Ye

ar 1

220

0520

0620

0720

0820

0920

10Ye

ar 1

1 (F

eb)

no.

2017

.924

23.1

1621

Year

12

(Aug

)no

.17

.513

.917

17.4

1215

Year

11

(Feb

) - 1

2 (A

ug)

%87

.577

.770

.875

.375

.071

.4St

ate

med

ian

%77

.375

.976

.875

.676

.778

.0

Year

7 (F

eb) -

12

(Aug

)C

ohor

ts:

AB

CD

EF

Year

720

0020

0120

0220

0320

0420

05Ye

ar 1

220

0520

0620

0720

0820

0920

10Ye

ar 7

(Feb

)no

.21

2320

2712

17Ye

ar 1

2 (A

ug)

no.

17.5

13.9

1717

.412

15Ye

ar 7

(Feb

) - 1

2 (A

ug)

%83

.360

.485

.064

.410

0.0

88.2

Stat

e m

edia

n%

68.6

66.2

67.2

64.5

67.4

67.3

60708090100

AB

CD

EF

GH

percent

coho

rt

60708090100

AB

CD

EF

G

percent

coho

rt

60708090100

AB

CD

EF

percent

coho

rt

60708090100

AB

CD

EF

percent

coho

rtSc

hool

Stat

e M

edia

nSc

hool

Tre

ndlin

e*

020

4060

8010

0

A B C D E F G H

perc

entil

e

cohort

020

4060

8010

0

A B C D E F G

perc

entil

e

cohort

020

4060

8010

0

A B C D E F

perc

entil

e

cohort

020

4060

8010

0

A B C D E F

perc

entil

e

cohort Scho

ol a

s pe

rcen

tile

* The

sch

ool t

rend

line

is o

nly

plot

ted

when

ther

e is

dat

a fo

r eac

h ca

lend

ar y

ear.

60708090100

AB

CD

EF

GH

percent

coho

rt

60708090100

AB

CD

EF

G

percent

coho

rt

60708090100

AB

CD

EF

percent

coho

rt

60708090100

AB

CD

EF

percent

coho

rtSc

hool

Stat

e M

edia

nSc

hool

Tre

ndlin

e*

020

4060

8010

0

A B C D E F G H

perc

entil

e

cohort

020

4060

8010

0

A B C D E F G

perc

entil

e

cohort

020

4060

8010

0

A B C D E F

perc

entil

e

cohort

020

4060

8010

0

A B C D E F

perc

entil

e

cohort Scho

ol a

s pe

rcen

tile

* The

sch

ool t

rend

line

is o

nly

plot

ted

when

ther

e is

dat

a fo

r eac

h ca

lend

ar y

ear.

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 4

8 of

59

76


Rea

l Stu

dent

Ret

entio

nN

otes

:Sc

hool

no:

Scho

ol n

ame:

Nam

eles

s P-

12 C

olle

geEx

plan

atio

n:R

eal r

eten

tion

rate

s sh

ow th

e pe

rcen

tage

of s

tude

nts

who

hav

e be

en e

nrol

led

at th

e sa

me

scho

ol o

ver a

per

iod

of ti

me.

For e

xam

ple,

the

form

ula

for t

he re

al re

tent

ion

rate

for Y

ear 7

Feb

to 1

0Aug

for s

choo

l X in

201

0 is

as

follo

ws:

By d

efin

ition

, rea

l sch

ool r

eten

tion

will

be le

ss th

an o

r equ

al to

100

% (a

ssum

ing

ther

e ar

e no

stu

dent

s re

peat

ing

the

year

, or a

ccel

erat

ing

thro

ugh

year

s).

Gen

eral

ly, r

eal

scho

ol re

tent

ion

rate

s ar

e af

fect

ed b

y st

uden

ts tr

ansf

errin

g to

ano

ther

sch

ool &

stu

dent

s ex

iting

the

scho

ol s

yste

m.

They

are

a m

easu

re o

f the

'hol

ding

pow

er' o

f the

sch

ool.

Sour

ce o

f dat

a:D

ata

retri

eved

ele

ctro

nica

lly fr

om C

ASES

21 a

t tim

e of

rollo

ver.

Year

7 (F

eb) -

10

(Aug

)Sc

hool

aga

inst

Sta

te^

Scho

ol a

s pe

rcen

tile

agai

nst S

FO p

erce

ntile

rang

e^C

ohor

ts:

AB

CD

EF

GYe

ar 7

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Year

10

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Year

7 (F

eb)

no.

2320

2712

1721

19Ye

ar 1

0 (A

ug)

no.

1516

17.4

1115

1213

Year

7 (F

eb) -

10

(Aug

)%

65.2

80.0

64.4

91.7

88.2

57.1

68.4

Stat

e m

edia

n^%

71.4

71.6

72.9

70.9

71.4

72.5

Year

10

(Aug

) - 1

1 (F

eb)

Coh

orts

:A

BC

DE

FYe

ar 1

020

0420

0520

0620

0720

0820

09

9999

(no.

of s

tude

nts

enro

lled

in Y

r10

in s

choo

l X a

s at

Aug

ust 2

010

cens

usan

d w

ho e

nrol

led

prio

r to

1/3/

2007

, ie,

enr

olle

d in

sch

ool X

at b

egin

ning

of Y

r7)

(enr

olm

ents

in Y

r7 F

eb in

200

7 ac

cord

ing

to c

ensu

s)

405060708090

AB

CD

EF

G

percent

coho

rt

708090 nt

020

4060

8010

0

A B C D E F G

perc

entil

e

cohort A B C ort

* The

sch

ool t

rend

line

is o

nly

plot

ted

when

ther

e is

dat

a fo

r eac

h ca

lend

ar y

ear.

^ 20

10 b

ench

mar

ks w

ill be

cal

cula

ted

in A

ugus

t, wh

en d

ata

from

all

scho

ols

has

been

sub

mitt

ed.

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 4

9 of

59

Year

11

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Year

10

(Aug

)no

.19

1921

.416

2216

Year

11

(Feb

)no

.17

2119

.415

2012

Year

10

(Aug

) - 1

1 (F

eb)

%89

.511

0.5

90.7

93.8

90.9

75.0

Stat

e m

edia

n^%

85.2

85.2

84.4

83.6

84.5

Year

11

(Feb

) - 1

2 (A

ug)

Coh

orts

:A

BC

DE

Year

11

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Year

12

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Year

11

(Feb

)no

.17

.924

23.1

1621

Year

12

(Aug

)no

.12

.917

15.4

1114

Year

11

(Feb

) - 1

2 (A

ug)

%72

.170

.866

.768

.866

.7St

ate

med

ian^

%71

.571

.671

.171

.3

Year

7 (F

eb) -

12

(Aug

)C

ohor

ts:

AB

CD

EYe

ar 7

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Year

12

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Year

7 (F

eb)

no.

2320

2712

17Ye

ar 1

2 (A

ug)

no.

10.9

1412

.48

12Ye

ar 7

(Feb

) - 1

2 (A

ug)

%47

.470

.045

.966

.770

.6St

ate

med

ian^

%48

.348

.347

.347

.3

405060708090

AB

CD

EF

G

percent

coho

rt

405060708090

AB

CD

EF

percent

coho

rt

405060708090

AB

CD

E

percent

coho

rt

405060708090

AB

CD

E

percent

coho

rtSc

hool

Stat

e M

edia

nSc

hool

Tre

ndlin

e*

020

4060

8010

0

A B C D E F G

perc

entil

e

cohort

020

4060

8010

0

A B C D E F

perc

entil

e

cohort

020

4060

8010

0

A B C D E

perc

entil

e

cohort0

2040

6080

100

A B C D E

perc

entil

ecohort

Scho

ol a

s pe

rcen

tile

SFO

Per

cent

ile ra

nge

* The

sch

ool t

rend

line

is o

nly

plot

ted

when

ther

e is

dat

a fo

r eac

h ca

lend

ar y

ear.

^ 20

10 b

ench

mar

ks w

ill be

cal

cula

ted

in A

ugus

t, wh

en d

ata

from

all

scho

ols

has

been

sub

mitt

ed.

405060708090

AB

CD

EF

G

percent

coho

rt

405060708090

AB

CD

EF

percent

coho

rt

405060708090

AB

CD

E

percent

coho

rt

405060708090

AB

CD

E

percent

coho

rtSc

hool

Stat

e M

edia

nSc

hool

Tre

ndlin

e*

020

4060

8010

0

A B C D E F G

perc

entil

e

cohort

020

4060

8010

0

A B C D E F

perc

entil

e

cohort

020

4060

8010

0

A B C D E

perc

entil

e

cohort0

2040

6080

100

A B C D E

perc

entil

ecohort

Scho

ol a

s pe

rcen

tile

SFO

Per

cent

ile ra

nge

* The

sch

ool t

rend

line

is o

nly

plot

ted

when

ther

e is

dat

a fo

r eac

h ca

lend

ar y

ear.

^ 20

10 b

ench

mar

ks w

ill be

cal

cula

ted

in A

ugus

t, wh

en d

ata

from

all

scho

ols

has

been

sub

mitt

ed.

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 4

9 of

59

77


Exit

Des

tinat

ion:

Yea

r 10

Scho

ol n

o:99

99Sc

hool

nam

e:N

amel

ess

P-12

Col

lege

Expl

anat

ion:

The

dest

inat

ion

of s

tude

nts

who

left

durin

g or

at t

he e

nd o

f Yea

r 10.

Sour

ce o

f dat

a:D

ata

retri

eved

ele

ctro

nica

lly fr

om C

ASES

21 fo

llowi

ng F

ebru

ary

cens

us.

Exit

Dest

inat

ion

n%

n%

n%

Cont

inui

ng e

duca

tion

and

train

ing

Gov

ernm

ent S

choo

l1

33.3

133

.31

16.7

Non-

Gov

ernm

ent S

choo

l1

33.3

266

.73

50.0

Univ

ersit

yO

ther

Tra

inin

g Pr

ovid

erTA

FE /

RTO

/ AC

EAp

pren

tices

hip

/ Tra

inee

ship

116

.7Ho

me

Scho

olin

gDe

ferre

dSU

BTO

TAL

266

.73

100.

05

83.3

Not c

ontin

uing

edu

catio

n an

d tra

inin

gEm

ploy

ed (p

art t

ime)

Empl

oyed

(ful

l tim

e)1

16.7

Unem

ploy

ed (s

eeki

ng w

ork)

Unem

ploy

ed (n

ot s

eeki

ng w

ork)

†SU

BTO

TAL

116

.7Un

know

n1

33.3

TOTA

L3

100.

03

100.

06

100.

0To

tal Y

r 10

Febr

uary

enr

olm

ent

2015

18

10.4

11.7

100.

0

1.5

4.4

3.4

1.1

12.4

6.0

0.3

0.1

77.9

47.8

6.9

0.1

4.3

2010

2008

2009

2009

sta

te^

%

Scho

ol a

gain

st S

tate

Not

es:*

The

sch

ool t

rend

line

is o

nly

plot

ted

whe

n th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.†

Incl

udes

dec

ease

d st

uden

ts.

^ 20

10 b

ench

mar

ks w

ill b

e ca

lcul

ated

in A

ugus

t, w

hen

data

from

all

scho

ols

has

been

sub

mitt

ed.

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

Empl

oyed

(par

t tim

e)Em

ploy

ed(fu

ll tim

e)U

nem

ploy

ed(s

eekin

g w

ork)

Une

mpl

oyed

(not

se

ekin

g w

ork)

†SU

BTO

TAL

Not

Con

tinui

ng E

duca

tion

and

Trai

ning

Unk

now

n

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Scho

ol a

t zer

o pe

rcen

t

0102030405060708090100

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

Gov

ernm

ent

Scho

olN

on-G

over

nmen

t Sc

hool

Uni

vers

ityO

ther

Tra

inin

g Pr

ovid

erTA

FE /

RTO

/ AC

EAp

pren

tices

hip

/ Tr

aine

eshi

pH

ome

Scho

olin

gD

efer

red

SUBT

OTA

L

Con

tinui

ng E

duca

tion

and

Trai

ning

perc

ent

Scho

olSt

ate

Mea

n

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

ision

, DEE

CD

Page

50

of 5

9

78


Exit

Des

tinat

ion:

Yea

r 11

Scho

ol n

o:99

99Sc

hool

nam

e:N

amel

ess

P-12

Col

lege

Expl

anat

ion:

The

dest

inat

ion

of s

tude

nts

who

left

durin

g or

at t

he e

nd o

f Yea

r 11.

Sour

ce o

f dat

a:D

ata

retri

eved

ele

ctro

nica

lly fr

om C

ASES

21 fo

llowi

ng F

ebru

ary

cens

us.

Exit

Dest

inat

ion

n%

n%

n%

Cont

inui

ng e

duca

tion

and

train

ing

Gov

ernm

ent S

choo

l1

16.7

Non-

Gov

ernm

ent S

choo

l1

14.3

150

.01

16.7

Univ

ersit

yO

ther

Tra

inin

g Pr

ovid

er1

50.0

TAFE

/ RT

O /

ACE

Appr

entic

eshi

p / T

rain

eesh

ip2

33.3

Hom

e Sc

hool

ing

Defe

rred

SUBT

OTA

L1

14.3

210

0.0

466

.7No

t con

tinui

ng e

duca

tion

and

train

ing

Empl

oyed

(par

t tim

e)Em

ploy

ed (f

ull t

ime)

116

.7Un

empl

oyed

(see

king

wor

k)Un

empl

oyed

(not

see

king

wor

k)†

SUBT

OTA

L1

16.7

Unkn

own

685

.71

16.7

TOTA

L7

100.

02

100.

06

100.

0To

tal Y

r 11

Febr

uary

enr

olm

ent

1621

20

8.4

1.9

24.4

12.6

100.

0

10.1

22.5

5.0

0.3

5.1

16.7

13.1

0.2

0.2

63.0

4.0

2008

2009

2010

2009

sta

te^

%

Scho

ol a

gain

st S

tate

Not

es:*

The

sch

ool t

rend

line

is o

nly

plot

ted

whe

n th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.†

Incl

udes

dec

ease

d st

uden

ts.

^ 20

10 b

ench

mar

ks w

ill b

e ca

lcul

ated

in A

ugus

t, w

hen

data

from

all

scho

ols

has

been

sub

mitt

ed.

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

Empl

oyed

(par

t tim

e)Em

ploy

ed(fu

ll tim

e)U

nem

ploy

ed(s

eekin

g w

ork)

Une

mpl

oyed

(not

se

ekin

g w

ork)

†SU

BTO

TAL

Not

Con

tinui

ng E

duca

tion

and

Trai

ning

Unk

now

n

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Scho

ol a

t zer

o pe

rcen

t

0102030405060708090100

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

Gov

ernm

ent

Scho

olN

on-G

over

nmen

t Sc

hool

Uni

vers

ityO

ther

Tra

inin

g Pr

ovid

erTA

FE /

RTO

/ AC

EAp

pren

tices

hip

/ Tr

aine

eshi

pH

ome

Scho

olin

gD

efer

red

SUBT

OTA

L

Con

tinui

ng E

duca

tion

and

Trai

ning

perc

ent

Scho

olSt

ate

Mea

n

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

ision

, DEE

CD

Page

51

of 5

9

79


Exit

Des

tinat

ion:

Stu

dent

s w

ho le

ft Ye

ar 1

2 be

fore

com

plet

ing

the

year

Scho

ol n

o:99

99Sc

hool

nam

e:N

amel

ess

P-12

Col

lege

Expl

anat

ion:

The

dest

inat

ion

of s

tude

nts

who

left

prio

r to

com

plet

ing

Year

12.

Sour

ce o

f dat

a:D

ata

retri

eved

ele

ctro

nica

lly fr

om C

ASES

21 fo

llowi

ng F

ebru

ary

cens

us.

Exit

Dest

inat

ion

n%

n%

n%

Cont

inui

ng e

duca

tion

and

train

ing

Gov

ernm

ent S

choo

l1

25.0

266

.7No

n-G

over

nmen

t Sch

ool

133

.31

25.0

Univ

ersit

yO

ther

Tra

inin

g Pr

ovid

erTA

FE /

RTO

/ AC

E1

25.0

Appr

entic

eshi

p / T

rain

eesh

ipHo

me

Scho

olin

gDe

ferre

dSU

BTO

TAL

125

.03

100.

02

50.0

Not c

ontin

uing

edu

catio

n an

d tra

inin

gEm

ploy

ed (p

art t

ime)

125

.0Em

ploy

ed (f

ull t

ime)

Unem

ploy

ed (s

eeki

ng w

ork)

Unem

ploy

ed (n

ot s

eeki

ng w

ork)

†1

25.0

SUBT

OTA

L2

50.0

Unkn

own

375

.0TO

TAL

410

0.0

310

0.0

410

0.0

Tota

l Yr 1

2 Fe

brua

ry e

nrol

men

t17

1418

10.6

2.7

36.1

12.4

100.

0

15.4

12.7

3.5

1.1

6.0

15.2

12.8

0.0

0.2

51.5

7.5

2008

2009

2010

2009

sta

te^

%

Scho

ol a

gain

st S

tate

Not

es:*

The

sch

ool t

rend

line

is o

nly

plot

ted

whe

n th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.†

Incl

udes

dec

ease

d st

uden

ts.

^ 20

10 b

ench

mar

ks w

ill b

e ca

lcul

ated

in A

ugus

t, w

hen

data

from

all

scho

ols

has

been

sub

mitt

ed.

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

Empl

oyed

(par

t tim

e)Em

ploy

ed(fu

ll tim

e)U

nem

ploy

ed(s

eekin

g w

ork)

Une

mpl

oyed

(not

se

ekin

g w

ork)

†SU

BTO

TAL

Not

Con

tinui

ng E

duca

tion

and

Trai

ning

Unk

now

n

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Scho

ol a

t zer

o pe

rcen

t

0102030405060708090100

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

Gov

ernm

ent

Scho

olN

on-G

over

nmen

t Sc

hool

Uni

vers

ityO

ther

Tra

inin

g Pr

ovid

erTA

FE /

RTO

/ AC

EAp

pren

tices

hip

/ Tr

aine

eshi

pH

ome

Scho

olin

gD

efer

red

SUBT

OTA

L

Con

tinui

ng E

duca

tion

and

Trai

ning

perc

ent

Scho

olSt

ate

Mea

n

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

ision

, DEE

CD

Page

52

of 5

9

80


Exit

Des

tinat

ion:

Stu

dent

s w

ho le

ft at

the

end

of Y

ear 1

2O

n Tr

ack

Scho

ol n

o:99

99So

urce

of d

ata:

Dat

a re

ceiv

ed fr

om a

tele

phon

e su

rvey

of Y

ear 1

2 co

mpl

eter

s,Sc

hool

nam

e:N

amel

ess

P-12

Col

lege

c

ondu

cted

in A

pril

/ May

of t

he s

ubse

quen

t yea

r.Ex

plan

atio

n:Th

e de

stin

atio

n of

stu

dent

s wh

o le

ft at

the

end

of Y

ear 1

2.Sc

hool

onl

ySo

urce

of d

ata:

Dat

a re

triev

ed e

lect

roni

cally

from

CAS

ES21

follo

wing

Feb

ruar

y ce

nsus

.

Exit

Dest

inat

ion

n%

n%

n%

Cont

inui

ng e

duca

tion

and

train

ing

Gov

ernm

ent S

choo

l1

5.9

Non-

Gov

ernm

ent S

choo

lUn

iver

sity

1210

0.0

1372

.2O

ther

Tra

inin

g Pr

ovid

erTA

FE /

RTO

/ AC

EAp

pren

tices

hip

/ Tra

inee

ship

Hom

e Sc

hool

ing

Defe

rred

SUBT

OTA

L1

5.9

1210

0.0

1372

.2No

t con

tinui

ng e

duca

tion

and

train

ing

Empl

oyed

(par

t tim

e)2

11.1

Empl

oyed

(ful

l tim

e)1

5.6

Unem

ploy

ed (s

eeki

ng w

ork)

Unem

ploy

ed (n

ot s

eeki

ng w

ork)

†2

11.1

Note

:The

exit

des

tinat

ion

data

from

On

Trac

k an

d C

ASES

21 is

not

dire

ctly

com

para

ble

SUBT

OTA

L5

27.8

for s

ever

al re

ason

s, o

ne o

f whi

ch is

the

diffe

rent

bas

es.

CAS

ES21

dat

a is

base

dUn

know

n16

94.1

on a

ll Yea

r 12

com

plet

ers,

whe

reas

On

Trac

k is

base

d on

Yea

r 12

com

plet

ers

who

TOTA

L17

100.

012

100.

018

100.

0re

spon

ded

to th

e su

rvey

. H

ence

the

CAS

ES21

dat

a ha

s an

"unk

now

n" c

ateg

ory

Tota

l Yr 1

2 Fe

brua

ry e

nrol

men

t17

1418

and

the

On

Trac

k da

ta d

oes

not.

Ano

ther

reas

on is

the

sligh

tly d

iffer

ent c

ateg

orie

sfo

r exa

mpl

e, C

ASES

21 in

clude

s a

"hom

e sc

hool

ing"

cat

egor

y.

4.0

0.6

18.0

4.9

100.

0

8.1

1.8

0.4

40.0

3.7

22.2

5.9

0.0

3.0

77.2

5.2

2008

2009

2010

2009

sta

te^

%

75767778

15141312

1321

3112

2334

4343

0102030405060708090100

2006200720082009

2006200720082009

2006200720082009

2006200720082009

2006200720082009

2006200720082009

Uni

vers

ity

enro

lled

TAFE

/ VE

T en

rolle

dAp

pren

tice

/ Tr

aine

eEm

ploy

edLo

okin

g fo

r w

ork

Def

erra

ls

perc

ent

Scho

ol a

gain

st S

tate

Not

es:*

The

sch

ool t

rend

line

is o

nly

plot

ted

whe

n th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.†

Incl

udes

dec

ease

d st

uden

ts.

^ 20

10 b

ench

mar

ks w

ill b

e ca

lcul

ated

in A

ugus

t, w

hen

data

from

all

scho

ols

has

been

sub

mitt

ed.

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

Empl

oyed

(par

t tim

e)Em

ploy

ed(fu

ll tim

e)U

nem

ploy

ed(s

eekin

g w

ork)

Une

mpl

oyed

(not

se

ekin

g w

ork)

†SU

BTO

TAL

Not

Con

tinui

ng E

duca

tion

and

Trai

ning

Unk

now

n

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Scho

ol a

t zer

o pe

rcen

t

0102030405060708090100

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

Gov

ernm

ent

Scho

olN

on-G

over

nmen

t Sc

hool

Uni

vers

ityO

ther

Tra

inin

g Pr

ovid

erTA

FE /

RTO

/ AC

EAp

pren

tices

hip

/ Tr

aine

eshi

pH

ome

Scho

olin

gD

efer

red

SUBT

OTA

L

Con

tinui

ng E

duca

tion

and

Trai

ning

perc

ent

Scho

olSt

ate

Mea

n

75767778

15141312

1321

3112

2334

4343

0102030405060708090100

2006200720082009

2006200720082009

2006200720082009

2006200720082009

2006200720082009

2006200720082009

Uni

vers

ity

enro

lled

TAFE

/ VE

T en

rolle

dAp

pren

tice

/ Tr

aine

eEm

ploy

edLo

okin

g fo

r w

ork

Def

erra

ls

perc

ent

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

ision

, DEE

CD

Page

53

of 5

9

81


Stud

ent A

bsen

ceSc

hool

no:

9999

Scho

ol n

ame:

Nam

eles

s P-

12 C

olle

geSo

urce

of d

ata:

Dat

a re

triev

ed e

lect

roni

cally

from

CAS

ES21

.Ex

plan

atio

n:Th

e av

erag

e (m

ean)

num

ber o

f abs

ent d

ays†

per

FTE

** s

tude

nt.

Not

e th

at 2

0 ab

sent

day

s eq

uate

s to

1 a

bsen

t day

per

fortn

ight

, and

10

abse

nt d

ays

to 1

abs

ent d

ay p

er m

onth

.Enrolments

Avg absent days / FTE** student

Enrolments


Enrolments


Enrolments


25th

ptile

Mea

n75

thpt

ilePr

ep23

.416

22.4

11.5

23.4

18.8

28.2

26.6

12.0

14.7

18.0

Yr 1

18.9

15.9

23.0

16.8

22.7

21.8

18.6

17.8

12.1

14.4

17.0

Yr 2

20.4

15.4

19.4

15.8

18.2

18.6

22.1

20.3

11.6

14.0

16.6

Yr 3

31.7

20.2

20.7

15.5

18.3

22.3

18.2

18.5

11.2

13.6

16.1

Yr 4

19.1

14.7

29.6

18.8

20.5

18.8

16.6

19.9

11.3

13.7

16.0

Yr 5

24.0

14.9

17.3

13.6

30.0

18.8

19.4

26.5

11.4

14.0

16.3

Yr 6

19.2

15.3

24.1

19.8

16.5

1829

.721

.311

.914

.416

.8Yr

718

.318

15.0

18.5

17.6

26.3

12.8

23.7

13.3

16.2

21.2

Yr 8

20.6

17.9

21.1

23.9

14.2

1718

.020

15.4

19.8

24.4

Yr 9

20.7

22.7

19.3

35.2

22.3

27.6

15.2

31.7

17.6

22.5

27.8

Not

es:

Yr 1

016

.018

.221

.025

.715

.040

.220

.634

.715

.820

.926

.0Yr

11

21.5

2417

.115

.821

.232

.520

.030

11.6

15.8

21.5

Yr 1

217

.817

.117

.18.

212

.817

.515

.48.

69.

013

.015

.8

Ung

rade

d15

.9

2008

2009

2007

2009

sta

tebe

nchm

ark^

2010

Scho

ol

Incl

udes

non

-cur

ricul

um a

bsen

ces

only

(abs

ence

cod

es 2

00, 2

01, 2

02,

203,

205

, 206

, 207

, 208

, 209

, 210

, 211

, 300

, 401

, 500

, 700

, 800

, 804

,80

5, 9

00).

The

scho

ol tr

endl

ine

is o

nly

plot

ted

whe

n th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

ld

† *

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6 Yr 7 Yr 8

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

aga

inst

SFO

per

cent

ile r

ange

^Im

prov

emen

t

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 5

4 of

59

Ung

rade

d15

.9

P-6

mea

n16

.416

.219

.621

.914

.17-

12 m

ean

19.9

21.8

27.5

2718

.3P-

12 m

ean

17.8

18.5

22.8

2315

.9

cale

ndar

yea

r.FT

E =

Full

Tim

e Eq

uiva

lent

(inc

udin

g pa

rt-tim

e &

part-

year

frac

tions

).20

10 b

ench

mar

ks a

nd p

erce

ntile

s w

ill be

cal

cula

ted

in A

ugus

t, w

hen

data

from

all

scho

ols

has

been

sub

mitt

ed.

** ^

051015202530354045

20072008200920102007200820092010200720082009201020072008200920102007200820092010200720082009201020072008200920102007200820092010200720082009201020072008200920102007200820092010200720082009201020072008200920102007200820092010

200720082009201020072008200920102007200820092010

Prep

Yr 1

Yr 2

Yr 3

Yr 4

Yr 5

Yr 6

Yr 7

Yr 8

Yr 9

Yr 1

0Yr

11

Yr 1

2U

n-gr

aded

Prep

-Yr6

Yr7

-Yr1

2Pr

ep-Y

r12

Days of absence per FTE** student .Scho

ol M

ean

agai

nst S

tate

Mea

n^

Scho

ol M

ean

Stat

e M

ean

Scho

ol T

rend

line*

Improvement .

020

4060

8010

0

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6 Yr 7 Yr 8 Yr 9 Yr 10 Yr 11 Yr 12Un-

gradedPrep-Yr6

Yr7 -Yr12

Prep-Yr12

perc

entil

eSc

hool

as

perc

entil

eSF

O P

erce

ntile

rang

e

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

aga

inst

SFO

per

cent

ile r

ange

^Im

prov

emen

t

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 5

4 of

59

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 5

4 of

59

82


Pare

nt O

pini

onSc

hool

no:

9999

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

(by

scho

ol ty

pe)

Scho

ol n

ame:

Nam

eles

s P-

12 C

olle

geEx

plan

atio

n:A

self-

com

plet

ion

ques

tionn

aire

to o

btai

n pa

rent

s' op

inio

ns o

f the

sch

ool.

Par

ents

rate

d a

num

ber o

f sta

tem

ents

usi

nga

scal

e w

here

1=s

trong

ly d

isag

ree

& 7=

stro

ngly

agr

ee.

The

stat

emen

ts w

ere

grou

ped

into

the

follo

win

g ca

tego

ries.

Sour

ce o

f dat

a: D

ata

scan

ned

from

que

stio

nnai

res

com

plet

ed b

y pa

rent

s.

Varia

ble

Varia

ble

Varia

ble

No.

Nam

eYe

arN

o.N

ame

Year

No.

Nam

eYe

ar1

Scho

ol Im

prov

emen

t20

085.

015.

217

Rep

ortin

g20

085.

115.

1513

Stud

ent S

afet

y^20

085.

455.

1520

094.

725.

1820

095.

065.

2620

095.

045.

1320

104.

835.

2820

105.

285.

2120

104.

915.

192

Appr

oach

abilit

y20

085.

515.

408

Lear

ning

Foc

us20

084.

675.

2714

Cla

ssro

om B

ehav

iour

^20

083.

963.

7120

095.

045.

3220

095.

065.

3120

093.

293.

7820

105.

515.

4220

105.

145.

3120

103.

333.

873

Teac

her M

oral

e20

085.

245.

199

Tran

sitio

ns20

085.

585.

3715

Con

nect

edne

ss to

Pee

rs20

085.

595.

6320

094.

835.

2020

095.

215.

4120

095.

545.

6720

105.

115.

3220

105.

345.

5620

105.

705.

704

Pare

nt In

put

2008

5.35

5.16

10Ex

tra C

urric

ula

2008

5.22

4.74

16St

uden

t Mot

ivat

ion

2008

5.31

5.06

2009

4.47

5.14

2009

4.44

4.70

2009

5.02

5.16

2010

4.95

5.11

2010

4.58

4.81

2010

5.18

5.18

5St

imul

atin

g Le

arni

ng20

085.

215.

1511

Hom

ewor

k20

084.

964.

7117

Soci

al S

kills

2008

5.43

5.51

2009

5.05

5.20

2009

4.74

4.71

2009

5.36

5.54

2010

5.14

5.29

2010

5.05

4.89

2010

5.53

5.55

6Be

havi

our M

anag

emen

t20

085.

144.

9012

Gen

eral

Sat

isfa

ctio

n20

085.

085.

3718

Scho

ol C

onne

cted

ness

2008

5.35

5.24

2009

4.74

5.02

2009

5.00

5.38

2009

5.51

5.33

2010

5.16

4.99

2010

5.00

5.38

2010

5.15

5.39

Scho

ol M

ean

agai

nst P

ri/Se

c St

ate

Mea

n

Not

es: *

The

scho

ol tr

endl

ine

is p

lotte

d w

hen

ther

e is

dat

a fo

r eac

h ca

lend

ar y

ear.

^^Be

nchm

arks

ava

ilabl

e fo

r Prim

ary,

Sec

onda

ry, P

ri/Se

c, S

peci

al a

nd S

DS

scho

ols.

**If

ther

e w

ere

6 or

less

resp

onde

nts,

tabl

e da

ta is

not

sho

wn

for c

onfid

entia

lity

reas

ons.

If t

here

wer

e 3

or le

ss re

spon

dent

s, g

raph

dat

a is

not

sho

wn

for c

onfid

entia

lity

reas

ons.

^Pa

rent

s' re

spon

ses

to a

ll ne

gativ

ely

phra

sed

ques

tions

hav

e be

en re

vers

ed fo

r rep

ortin

g pu

rpos

es. A

cros

s al

l var

iabl

es, t

he h

ighe

r the

sco

re o

r per

cent

ile ra

nk, t

he m

ore

posi

tive

pare

nts'

perc

eptio

ns.

Stat

ePr

i/Sec

med

ian

Scho

olm

ean

Scho

olm

ean

Scho

olm

ean

Stat

ePr

i/Sec

med

ian

Stat

ePr

i/Sec

med

ian

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

Scho

ol

Impr

ov.

Appr

oa-

chab

ility

Teac

her

Mor

ale

Pare

nt

Inpu

tSt

im.

Lear

ning

Beh.

M

anag

.R

epor

t-in

gLe

arni

ng

Focu

sTr

an-

sitio

nsEx

tra

Cur

ricul

aH

ome-

work

Gen

eral

Sa

tis.

Stud

ent

Safe

ty^

Cla

ss.

Beh.

^C

onne

ct.

to P

eers

Stud

ent

Mot

iv.

Soci

al

Skills

Scho

ol

Con

nect

.

Scho

ol C

limat

eSt

uden

t Be

havi

our^

Stud

ent

Enga

gem

ent

1=strongly disagree, 7=strongly agree

Scho

ol M

ean

Stat

e M

edia

nSc

hool

Tre

ndlin

e*

Improvement .

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

School ClimateStudent

Behaviour^Student

Engagement

perc

entil

eSc

hool

Mea

n as

per

cent

ile

Impr

ovem

ent

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luat

ion

Div

isio

n, D

EEC

DPa

ge 5

5 of

59

83


Staf

f Opi

nion

Scho

ol re

spon

se ra

te**

aga

inst

Pri/

Sec

scho

ol d

istr

ibut

ion

Scho

ol n

o:99

99Sc

hool

nam

e:N

amel

ess

P-12

Col

lege

Expl

anat

ion:

A se

lf-co

mpl

etio

n qu

estio

nnai

re to

obt

ain

the

staf

f's o

pini

ons

of th

e sc

hool

. Th

e su

rvey

was

adm

inis

tere

d on

line

usin

g th

e Sc

hool

Org

anis

atio

nal H

ealth

Que

stio

nnai

re.

Sour

ce o

f dat

a: D

ata

trans

mitt

ed fr

om s

choo

l sta

ff to

DEE

CD

via

an

onlin

e su

rvey

app

licat

ion.

Varia

ble

Varia

ble

Varia

ble

No.

Nam

eYe

arSc

hool

m

ean

No.

Nam

eYe

arSc

hool

m

ean

No.

Nam

eYe

arSc

hool

m

ean

120

0866

.967

.18

Appr

aisa

l & R

ecog

nitio

n20

0856

.661

.915

Lear

ning

Env

ironm

ent

2008

59.8

67.8

2009

66.7

68.1

2009

60.2

61.1

2009

66.6

67.6

No. i

nvite

d20

1059

.970

.520

1054

.264

.120

1061

.570

.820

0846

220

0864

.663

.49

Prof

essi

onal

Gro

wth

2008

69.4

66.2

16St

uden

t Mis

beha

viou r

2008

35.0

37.7

2009

4320

0961

.665

.020

0966

.466

.120

0936

.637

.820

1043

2010

55.7

67.2

2010

61.2

65.2

2010

37.2

38.6

320

0870

.267

.610

Cur

ricul

um C

oord

inat

ion

2008

53.5

62.3

17C

lass

room

Mis

beha

viou r

2008

20.4

17.7

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

(by

scho

ol ty

pe)

2009

65.4

67.7

2009

67.7

61.1

2009

17.7

16.7

2010

61.2

70.2

2010

57.5

63.5

2010

16.4

16.7

420

0871

.271

.311

Effe

ctive

Dis

cipl

ine

Polic

y20

0855

.364

.718

Exce

ssive

Wor

k D

eman

ds20

0848

.848

.520

0973

.370

.520

0955

.763

.120

0949

.352

.020

1068

.572

.320

1055

.064

.620

1048

.351

.65

2008

66.8

71.9

12St

uden

t Orie

ntat

ion

2008

72.3

76.5

19In

divid

ual D

istre

ss20

0826

.729

.020

0971

.371

.520

0979

.376

.820

0931

.629

.320

1066

.173

.320

1072

.878

.220

1035

.227

.16

2008

64.7

62.4

13St

uden

t Mot

ivatio

n20

0854

.059

.120

Scho

ol D

istre

ss20

0835

.840

.920

0967

.062

.020

0962

.460

.520

0944

.443

.120

1058

.364

.120

1060

.460

.720

1044

.538

.67

2008

64.0

70.0

14St

uden

t Dec

isio

n-M

akin

g20

0864

.060

.420

0969

.869

.620

0978

.961

.520

1061

.971

.620

1068

.862

.3

Scho

ol M

ean

agai

nst P

ri/Se

c St

ate

Med

ian

Not

es: *

The

scho

ol tr

endl

ine

is o

nly

plot

ted

whe

n th

ere

is d

ata

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.**

If th

ere

wer

e 6

or le

ss re

spon

dent

s, ta

ble

data

is n

ot s

how

n fo

r con

fiden

tialit

y re

ason

s. I

f the

re w

ere

3 or

less

resp

onde

nts,

gra

ph d

ata

is n

ot s

how

n fo

r con

fiden

tialit

y re

ason

s.^

The

high

er th

e sc

hool

mea

n, th

e m

ore

posi

tive

the

outc

ome

for v

aria

bles

1 to

15.

The

low

er th

e sc

hool

mea

n, th

e m

ore

posi

tive

the

outc

ome

for v

aria

bles

16

to 2

0.†

The

high

er th

e sc

hool

per

cent

ile, t

he m

ore

posi

tive

the

outc

ome

for a

ll va

riabl

es.

^^Be

nchm

arks

are

ava

ilabl

e fo

r Prim

ary,

Sec

onda

ry, P

ri/Se

c, S

peci

al &

SD

S sc

hool

s.

Stat

e Pr

i/Sec

m

edia

n In

divid

ual M

oral

e

Stat

e Pr

i/Sec

m

edia

n

Stat

e Pr

i/Sec

m

edia

n

Goa

l Con

grue

nce

Parti

cipa

tive

Dec

isio

n-M

akin

g

Scho

ol M

oral

e

Supp

ortiv

e Le

ader

ship

Rol

e C

larit

y

Prof

essi

onal

Inte

ract

ion

30

57%

58%

70%

No. o

f res

pond

ents

Res

pons

e R

ate

26 25

0102030405060708090100

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

Indi

vidua

l M

oral

eSc

hool

M

oral

eSu

ppor

tive

Lead

ersh

ipR

ole

Cla

rity

Prof

essi

onal

In

tera

ctio

nPa

rtici

pativ

e D

ecis

ion

-Mak

ing

Goa

l C

ongr

uenc

eAp

prai

sal &

R

ecog

nitio

nPr

ofes

sion

al

Gro

wth

Cur

ricul

um

Coo

rdin

atio

nEf

fect

ive

Dis

cipl

ine

Polic

y

Stud

ent

Orie

ntat

ion

Stud

ent

Mot

ivatio

nSt

uden

t D

ecis

ion-

Mak

ing

Lear

ning

En

viron

men

tSt

uden

t M

is-

beha

viour

Cla

ssro

om

Mis

-be

havio

ur

Exce

ssive

W

ork

Dem

ands

Indi

vidua

l D

istre

ssSc

hool

D

istre

ss

MO

TIVA

TIO

NEM

PATH

YC

LAR

ITY

ENG

AGEM

ENT

LEAR

NING

OUT

CO

MES

MO

TIVA

TIO

N

Scho

ol M

ean

Stat

e M

edia

nSc

hool

Tre

ndlin

e*

Improvement ^ .

Elem

ent:

Improvement ^ .

020406080100

2008

2009

2010

Response Rate (%)

020

4060

8010

0

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

MotivationEm-pathy Clarity Engagement Learning Outcomes Motivation

perc

entile

Scho

ol M

ean

as p

erce

ntile

Impr

ovem

ent †

.

Lege

nd:

Stat

e 90

th p

erce

ntile

Stat

e 75

th p

erce

ntile

Stat

e M

edia

nSt

ate

25th

per

cent

ile

Stat

e 10

th p

erce

ntile

Scho

ol

Prod

uced

by

Dat

a, O

utco

mes

and

Eva

luatio

n D

ivis

ion,

DEE

CD

Page

56

of 5

9

84


Perf

orm

ance

& D

evel

opm

ent C

ultu

re (P

&DC)

††

Scho

ol n

o:99

99Sc

hool

nam

e:Na

mel

ess

P-12

Col

lege

Expl

anat

ion:

The

data

on

this

page

refe

rs to

the

Staf

f Opi

nion

Sur

vey.

Sour

ce o

f dat

a:D

ata

trans

mitt

ed fr

om s

choo

l sta

ff to

DEE

CD

via

an

onlin

e su

rvey

app

licat

ion.

Scho

ol M

ean

agai

nst P

ri/Se

c St

ate

Med

ian

Not

es:

††An

ass

essm

ent o

f the

cor

rela

tion

betw

een

the

P&D

C Q

uest

ionn

aire

and

the

Staf

f Opi

nion

Sur

vey

was

unde

rtake

n us

ing

data

from

Vict

oria

n G

over

nmen

t sch

ools

that

com

plet

ed b

oth

surv

eys

from

.20

05 to

200

7 (ie

. 699

sch

ools)

. Th

is le

d to

the

iden

tifica

tion

of th

e co

mpo

nent

s of

the

Staf

f Opi

nion

Sur

vey

that

cou

ld b

e us

ed to

ass

ist s

choo

ls wi

th th

e on

goin

g m

onito

ring

of th

eir p

erfo

rman

ce

.

and

deve

lopm

ent c

ultu

re.

Ref

er to

the

P&D

C w

ebsit

e fo

r fur

ther

info

rmat

ion:

http

://ww

w.ed

ucat

ion.

vic. g

ov.a

u/m

anag

emen

t/sch

oolim

prov

emen

t/pan

ddc/

defa

ult.h

tm.

For n

umer

ical r

esul

ts

.

rela

ting

to th

e ab

ove

grap

h, re

fer t

o th

e St

aff O

pini

on S

urve

y pa

ge in

this

repo

rt.

.

†N

ote

that

ther

e is

no s

i gni

fican

t cor

rela

tion

betw

een

the

Staf

f Opi

nion

Sur

vey

and

P&D

C e

lem

ents

1 (I

nduc

tion)

and

3 (C

usto

mise

d In

divid

ual D

evel

opm

ent P

lans

).

.

^Th

e P&

DC

thre

shol

d wa

s de

rived

from

the

P&D

C Q

uest

ionn

aire

'per

cent

favo

urab

le' m

etho

dolo

gy w

here

a s

choo

l is c

onsid

ered

at t

he s

tand

ard

of a

ccre

dita

tion

when

thei

r Ele

men

t sco

re is

>75

%

.

favo

urab

le (i

e. a

t lea

st 7

5% o

f sta

ff se

lect

ed th

e to

p tw

o re

spon

se c

ateg

orie

s in

the

P&D

C Q

uest

ionn

aire

).

.

*Th

e sc

hool

tren

dlin

e is

onl y

plot

ted

when

ther

e is

data

for e

ach

cale

ndar

yea

r.

.**

If th

ere

were

3 o

r les

s re

spon

dent

s, g

raph

dat

a is

not s

hown

for c

onfid

entia

lity re

ason

s.

.

^^Be

nchm

arks

are

ava

ilabl

e fo

r Prim

ary,

Sec

onda

ry, P

ri/Se

c, S

pecia

l & S

DS

scho

ols.

.

0102030405060708090100

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

200820092010

Prof

essi

onal

In

tera

ctio

nAp

prai

sal &

R

ecog

nitio

nLe

arni

ngEn

viron

men

tAp

prai

sal &

R

ecog

nitio

nLe

arni

ngEn

viron

men

tG

oal

Con

grue

nce

Prof

essi

onal

G

row

thPr

ofes

sion

al

Inte

ract

ion

Appr

aisa

l &

Rec

ogni

tion

Lear

ning

Envir

onm

ent

Goa

l C

ongr

uenc

ePa

rtici

pativ

e D

ecis

ion-

Mak

ing

ELEM

ENT

1†:

IND

UC

TIO

NEL

EMEN

T 2:

MU

LTIP

LE S

OU

RC

ESO

F FE

EDBA

CK

ELEM

ENT

3†:

CU

STO

MIS

ED

IND

IVID

UAL

DEV

. PLA

NS

ELEM

ENT

4:Q

UAL

ITY

PRO

FESS

ION

ALD

EVEL

OPM

ENT

ELEM

ENT

5:ST

AFF

BELI

EF IN

PER

FOR

MAN

CE

&D

EVEL

OPM

ENT

CU

LTU

RE

Scho

ol M

ean

Stat

e M

edia

nSc

hool

Tre

ndlin

e*P&

DC

thre

shol

d^

Improvement . Prod

uced

by

Data

, Out

com

es a

nd E

valu

atio

n Di

visio

n, D

EECD

Page

57

of 5

9

85


Staff Sick LeaveSchool no:School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeExplanation: The number of non-certificated and total sick leave days taken per staff member. A detailed

explanation on how staff sick leave is calculated is provided at: www.education.vic.gov.au/management/schoolimprovement/performancedata/performancereportsfaq.htm.

Source of data: Human Resources Management System (HRMS)^.

Non-Certificated sick leave days per staff member^

Staff Type 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008** 2009** 2010** 2010 State Median**

Teacher 2.03 2.01 2.46 2.13 2.05 2.09 2.55 2.16 2.50ES^^ 0.79 0.84 1.25 0.91 1.79 0.68 0.71 1.00

Total sick leave days per staff member^

Staff Type 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008** 2009** 2010** 2010 State Median**

Teacher 5.50 6.43 6.81 5.61 4.00 3.45 5.92 13.51 16.00ES^^ 12.36 2.71 16.60 6.00 7.44 5.27 8.84 11.00

NON-CERTIFICATED sick leave

9999

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

ays

per s

taff

mem

ber

.

TOTAL sick leave

Notes:* The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.

** The way in which sick leave data are calculated changed in 2008. As such, data from2008 cannot be compared with previous years.

^ There may be some discrepancy between the results from CASES21 and those fromHRMS. The latter are considered to be more accurate.

^^ Data for ES (Education Support) staff is only available from 2003.

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

**

2009

**

2010

**

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

**

2009

**

2010

**

Teaching staff ES staff^^

avg

days

per

sta

ff m

embe

r .

02468

1012141618

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

**

2009

**

2010

**

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

**

2009

**

2010

**


avg

days

per

sta

ff m

embe

r .

Legend: State 90th percentile

State 75th percentile

State Median


State 10th percentileSchool

School Trendline*

( ) y

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

**

2009

**

2010

**

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

**

2009

**

2010

**


avg

days

per

sta

ff m

embe

r .

02468

1012141618

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

**

2009

**

2010

**

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

**

2009

**

2010

**


avg

days

per

sta

ff m

embe

r .

Legend: State 90th percentile


State Median


State 10th percentileSchool

School Trendline*


86


Bank BalancesSchool no: 9999School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeExplanation: Account balance figures include official and investment accounts, and are

calculated by taking the opening balance at 1st January plus the total receiptsat 31st December less total payments at 31st December.

Account Balances (Official plus Investment Accounts)2003 $72,318 2007 $192,6802004 $40,389 2008 $117,8712005 $150,165 2009 $55,7402006 $133,229 2010 $146,559

Account Balances

$0

$50,000

$100,000

$150,000

$200,000

$250,000

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Account Balances (Official plus Investment Accounts) per student†

2003 $268 2007 $7182004 $147 2008 $4412005 $552 2009 $2262006 $487 2010 $588

School account balances per student enrolled in August census plotted on state Pri/Sec benchmarks^

Legend:

Notes:* The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.† The account balance per student has been calculated to enable some comparison to be made between schools.^ Benchmarks for primary, secondary, pri/sec, SDS, special and language schools. 2010 benchmarks will be calculated in August, when data from all schools has been submitted.

$0

$50,000

$100,000

$150,000

$200,000

$250,000

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

90th percentile

75th percentile

Median

25th percentile

10th percentileSchool

School Trendline*


87


Key: Range of results for the middle 60% of Victorian government schools:

Result for this school: Median of all Victorian government schools:

Overall Measures Student Outcomes School Comparison

1. Student Learning

Lower HigherOutcomes Outcomes

2. Student Engagement and Wellbeing

Combining teacher assessments from the Victorian Essential Learning Standards (VELS), the results from the National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) tests and the Victorian Certificate of Education (VCE).

Government School PerformanceSummary 2010

Nameless Secondary College

Results achieved by students at this school compared to students at other Victorian government schools.

How this school compares to all Victorian government schools

This page provides the overall picture of this school's performance in the past year.The following pages provide more detail on each of these measures.

Whether this school, taking into account its students, is performing higher than, lower than, or broadly similar to other schools, taking into account their students.

Lower Similar Higher


3. Student Pathways and Transitions


School Profile● ● ● Overall socio-economic profile

●

● ●

For more information regarding this school, please visit www.vrqa.vic.gov.au/sreg

Based on the school's Student Family Occupation index which takes into account parents' occupations.

high

Combining student attendance rates and results from the annual student Attitudesto School survey.

Combining the number of students remaining at school through to Year 10 and students going on to further study or full-time employment from Years 10 to 12.

1 5

All Victorian government school teachers meet the registration requirements of the Victorian Institute of Teaching (www.vit.vic.edu.au).

low low-mid mid

1

340 students (153 female, 187 male) were enrolled at this school in 2010.

Average level of parent satisfactionwith the school, as derived fromthe annual Parent Opinion survey.The score is reported on a scaleof 1 to 7, where 7 is the highestpossible score.

Average level of staff satisfaction with the school, as derived from the annual Staff Opinion survey. The score is reported on a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 is the highest possible score.

7 mid mid-high highlow low-mid

Proportion of students with English as a second language

mid-high




9999 Version 1, February 2011




88


Nameless Secondary College Key:

Range of results for the middle 60% of Victorian government schools:


Student Learning Student Outcomes School ComparisonResults: English and Mathematics 2009

● English and Mathematics

Results: All other subjects 2009

5. NAPLAN Year 7 Results: Reading 2010

Band 4 5 6 7 8 9

Results: Reading 2008 - 2010(3-year average)

Band 4 5 6 7 8 9

●0

0

Results: All other subjects2007 - 2009 (3-year average)

100

Average score achieved on the NAPLAN Reading and Numeracy tests conducted in May each year.

The grades are the same as those used in your child's end of year report.


Bands represent different levels of achievement. For Year 7, the National

Year 7 assessments are reported on a scale from Bands 4-9.

Being the first year of secondary

A ‘C’ rating means that a student is at the standard expected at the time of reporting.

4. Teacher assessments from the Victorian Essential Learning Standards (VELS)

Results: English and Mathematics2007 - 2009 (3-year average)

100

0

0

100

Percentage of students in Years 7 to 10 with a grade of C or above in:

100

All other subjects





Band 4 5 6 7 8 9

Results: Numeracy 2010

Band 4 5 6 7 8 9

Results: Numeracy 2008-2010(3-year average)

Band 4 5 6 7 8 9

6. NAPLAN Year 9 Results: Reading 2010

Band 5 6 7 8 9 10

Results: Reading 2008 - 2010(3-year average)

Band 5 6 7 8 9 10

Results: Numeracy 2010

Band 5 6 7 8 9 10

Results: Numeracy 2008-2010(3-year average)

Band 5 6 7 8 9 10

Version 1, February 2011

Average score achieved on the NAPLAN Reading and Numeracy tests conducted in May each year.

Bands represent different levels of achievement. For Year 9, the National Minimum Standard is at Band 6.

Year 9 assessments are reported on a scale from Bands 5-10.

,Minimum Standard is at Band 5.

Being the first year of secondary school, Year 7 NAPLAN is not used for the School Comparison.









89


Nameless Secondary College Key:

Range of results for the middle 60% of Victorian government schools:


Student Learning Student Outcomes School Comparison7. Victorian Certificate of Education (VCE) Results: 2010

0 50

Results: 2007 - 2010 (4-year average)

Percent of students in 2010 who satisfactorily completed their VCE: 97%Percent of Year 12 students in 2010 undertaking at least one Vocational Education and Training (VET) unit of competence: 82%Percent of VET units of competence satisfactorily completed in 2010: 85%Percent of Victorian Certificate of Applied Learning (VCAL) credits satisfactorily completed in 2010: 90%

Student Engagement Student Outcomes School Comparison and Wellbeing

8. Student attendance Results: 2009

0 100


0 100

This includes all Unit 3 and 4 studies (including those completed in Year 11) and any VCE VET studies awarded a study score. The maximum student study score is 50 and the state-wide mean (including government and non-government schools) is set at 30.

0 50


Mean study score from all VCE subjects undertaken by students at this school.

Average attendance rate of all students in the school. Common reasons for non-attendance include illness and extended family holidays.





Average 2009 attendance rate by year level:

9. Student attitudes to school Results: 2010

1 5


1 5

Student Pathways Student Outcomes School Comparison and Transitions

10. Student retention Results: 2009

0


0 100

Results: 2009

0 100


0 100

100

93%81% 82% 80% 87% 94%Yr12Yr8 Yr9 Yr10 Yr11

Percentage of students from Years 10 to 12 going on to further studies or full-time employment.

11. Students exiting to further studies and full-time employment

Percentage of Year 7 students who remain at the school through to Year 10.

Derived from the Attitudes to School survey completed annually by Victorian government school students in Years 5 to 12. It includes questions about students’ engagement in and enjoyment of school. The school’s average score is reported here on a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 is the highest possible score.

Yr7










Version 1, February 2011











90


The Governhow it compAll schools to improve oBy sharing ttogether to

What are stStudent outstudents in other subjecliteracy andcolleges, th(VCE) examinformationengagemenFor secondaPerformancabout how mfurther studYou can seeas the averaavailable). The Governalso allows students at students in

The first pyour schoits results

nment Schoopares to all oacknowledgeoutcomes fothis informatachieve exce

tudent outctcomes showthis school incts. They als numeracy tee Victorian C

minations. Thabout stude

nt at school. ary colleges,

ce Summary many studenies or full-time these resuage of the la

nment Schooyou to compthis school wall other Vict

page outlineool is doing to.

ol Performancother Victoriae the partnerr children anion with the cellence in ev

comes? w the achieven English, Mso show resuests and, forCertificate of hey provide imnt attendanc

, the Governalso provide

nts at this schme work after

lts for the latst four years

ol Performancpare student with the outcotorian govern

es what o improve

ce Summaryn governmenrship and sup

nd young peocommunity,

very school.

ements of athematics a

ults in nationar secondary Educationmportant

ce and

ment Schooes informationhool go on tor leaving schtest year, as s (where

ce Summaryoutcomes foomes of nment schoo

The seconyour schoo

Performy provides annt schools. pport of their

ople. our goal is to

andal

lnoool. well

yor

ols.

nd page sumol’s performa

Govmancen overview of

r parents and

o identify whe

mmarises ance.

How tvernmee Summ

f how this sc

d the commu

ere we need

The third aprovide a deof each of th

to readent Schmary 2chool is perfo

unity in worki

d to improve a

and fourth paetailed breakhe result are

d the hool010

orming, and

ng together

and to work

ageskdown eas.

91


What is a School Comparison?The School comparison is a way of comparing school performance that takes into account the different student intake characteristics of each school. A School comparison takes into account the school’s academic intake, the socio-economic background of students, the number of Indigenous students, the number of non-English speaking and refugee students, the number of students with a disability, and the size and location of the school. The School comparison measures show that most schools are doing well and are achieving results that are ‘similar’ to what we would estimate given the background characteristics of their students. Some schools are doing exceptionally well with the students they have, and have ‘higher’ performance.

Some schools have ‘lower’ performance after taking into account their students’ characteristics – these schools will receive targeted support to ensure that there is improvement.

Looking at both the student outcomes and school comparisons provides important information about what a school is doing well and the areas that require further improvement. More information on school comparison performance measures can be found at: www.education.vic.gov.au/aboutschool/

What is the meaning of ‘Data not available’?For some schools, there are too few students to provide data. For other schools, there are no students at some levels, so school comparisons are not possible. Newly opened schools have only the latest year of data and no averages from previous years. The Department also recognises the unique circumstances of Specialist, Select Entry, English Language and Community Schools where school comparisons are not appropriate.

What is this school doing to improve? All schools have a plan to improve outcomes for their students. The ‘What our school is doing’statement provides a summary of this school’s improvement plan.

92


Handout B1School strategic planning: quiz

No. Question Answer

1. Which of the following are councillors responsible for in the school self-evaluation process?

i. planning the self-evaluation

ii. keeping everyone informed about the contents of the report

iii. endorsement of the final report

iv. forwarding the report to the Department

v. participating in consultations with the community

vi. reviewing the plan and timeline for the self-evaluation.

Clue: only 3 are correct

2. School performance is measured against the student outcome areas, one of which is student learning. What is one of the other two areas?

3. What is the most effective way that councillors can become aware of the values and aspirations of their community?

4. How many different types of review are there?

Who determines the type of review that will be implemented in each school?

5. How does an external reviewer add value to the school strategic plan?

6. What can you do if you want to comment on the review process?

7. You may think a particular building or resource needs to be improved. On what grounds would you have the best chance of gaining funding for such an initiative?

8. How might information from the attitudes to school survey impact on setting goals and targets?

9. When does the school annual report need to be completed and forwarded to the regional network leader?

10. What do you see as the most important part of your role as a school councillor?

93


2 strategic planning - vsl council/improving school... · self-evaluation and review ... improving...

Documents