2 -evolution of management theory

Upload: shilpa-n-lende

Post on 03-Apr-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    1/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 1

    Module I

    Chapter:2

    Evolution of Management Theory

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    2/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 2

    1.What is Theory?

    Theory is a coherent group of assumptions

    put forth to explain the relationship

    between two or more observable facts and

    to provide sound basis for predicting future

    events.

    Theories are perspectives with which

    people make sense of their world

    experiences.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    3/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 3

    2.Why study Management Theory?

    First, theories provide a stable focus for

    understanding what we experience.

    Second, theories enable us to communicate

    efficiently and thus move in to more and

    more complex relationships with other

    people.

    Third, theories make it possible- indeed,

    challenge us-to keep learning about our

    world.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    4/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 4

    3.The Evolution of Management Theory:

    Management and Organizations are

    products of their historical and social times

    and places.

    We can understand the evolution of

    management theory in terms of how

    people have wrestled with matters of

    relationships at particular time in the

    history.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    5/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 5

    4. Focus of Study:

    Following Management theories:

    4.1: The Scientific Management Theory.4.2: The Classical Organization Theory.

    4.3: The behavioral school Theory.

    4.4: The management science Theory.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    6/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 6

    Following recent integrative approaches:

    1.1: The System Approach

    1.2: The Contingency Approach1.3: The dynamic engagement Approach

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    7/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 7

    4.1: The Scientific Management Theory:

    1.Why this theory has arisen?

    There was need to increase productivity in USA when

    labor was in short supply at the beginning of 20th

    Century.

    The only way to expand productivity was to raise the

    efficiency of workers.

    2. Frederick W. Taylor, Henery L Gantt and Frank andLillian Gilberth devised body of principles known as

    scientific management theory.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    8/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 8

    3.Principles of Scientific Management:

    Frederic W.Taylor:[1856-1915]

    1.The development of true science ofmanagement, so that the best method for

    performing each task could be determined.

    2. The scientific selection of workers.3. The scientific education and development

    of worker.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    9/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 9

    4. Intimate, friendly co-operation between

    management and labor.

    Taylor believed that management and labor

    had a common interest in increasing

    productivity.

    Taylor based his management system on

    production-line time studies.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    10/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 10

    He also encouraged employers to pay more

    productive workers at a higher rate than

    others using a scientifically correct rate

    that would benefit both company andworker. Taylor called his plan differential

    rate system.

    Henry L. Gantt:[1861-1919]

    Gantt worked with Taylor on several

    projects. But he had different view on

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    11/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 11

    Taylors incentive system. Gantt came up

    with a new idea. Every worker who

    finished a days assigned work load would

    win around 50- cent bonus.

    Then he added a second motivation. The

    supervisor would earn a bonus for each

    worker who reached the daily standard;plus an extra bonus if all the workers

    reached it.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    12/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 12

    This will motivate supervisors to train their

    workers to do a better job.

    Every workers progress was rated publicly

    and recorded on individual bar charts- in

    black on days the worker made the

    standard, in red when he or she fell below

    it.

    Gantt originated a charting system for

    production scheduling-The Gantt Chart.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    13/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 13

    The Gantt chart is still in use to-day.

    It also formed the basis for charting devices

    which were developed to assist in

    planning, managing and controlling

    complex organizations. One such device

    is Critical Path Method(CPM), originated

    by Du Pont and another device is ProgramEvaluation and Review Technique[PERT]

    developed by Navy.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    14/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 14

    The Gilbreths:(1868-1924 and 1878-1972)

    They made their contribution to the scientific

    management movement by study of fatigue and

    motion studies and focused on ways ofpromoting individual workers welfare.

    Using motion picture cameras, they tried to find the

    most economical motions for each task in order

    to upgrade performance and reduce fatigue.

    Every motion that was eliminated reduced the

    fatigue.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    15/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 15

    According to Gilberths, motion study would raise

    worker morale because of its obvious physical

    benefits and managements concern for the

    worker.Contributions of Scientific Management Theory:

    The contribution of Scientific Management is

    immense in providing concept of improved

    production techniques to modern assembly lines

    pouring production at very fast rate. Its efficiency

    techniques have been applied to many tasks in

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    16/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 16

    non-industrial organizations, ranging from

    fast-food service to the training of

    surgeons.

    Limitations of Scientific Management

    Theory:

    1.The workers began to oppose Taylorsmethods of increase in productivity and

    higher pay out of the fear that working

    harder or faster would exhaust the work

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    17/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 17

    available, causing layoffs.

    2. The emphasis on productivity- and by

    extension, profitability led some managers

    to exploit both workers and customers.

    As a result, more workers joined unions

    and the seeds of suspicion and mistrust

    were sown.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    18/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 18

    4.2:Classical Organization Theory School:

    Scientific Management was concerned with

    increasing the productivity of the Shop and

    the individual worker.

    Classical organization theory grew out of the

    need to find guidelines for managing such

    complex organizations as factories.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    19/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 19

    Henri Fayol(1841-1925) is generally hailed

    as the founder of the classical

    management school. He made an attempt

    to identify the principles and skills thatunderline effective management.

    Fayol has laid down following principles of

    management:

    1.Division of Labor.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    20/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 20

    2. Authority.

    3. Discipline.

    4. Unity of Command5. Unity of Direction.

    6. Subordination of individual interest to the

    common good.7. Remuneration.

    9. Centralization.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    21/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 21

    10.The Hierarchy

    11. Order

    12. Equity13. Stability of Staff

    14. Initiative

    15. Esprit de corps- Promoting team spiritwill give organization a sense of unity.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    22/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 22

    Taylor was concerned with Organizational

    functions whereas Fayol was interested in

    the total Organization.

    Before Fayol, it was generally believed that

    managers are born, not made.

    Fayol insisted that management was a skill

    like any other- one that could be thought

    once its underlying principles were

    understood.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    23/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 23

    Max weber (1864-1920) developed a theory

    of bureaucratic management that stressed

    for the need for a strictly defined hierarchy

    governed by clearly defined regulationsand lines of authority.

    Marry Parker Follet(1868-1933) :She

    introduced many new elements, especiallyin the area of human relationship and

    Organizational structure.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    24/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 24

    According to Follet no one could become a

    whole person except as a member of the

    group, human beings grew through their

    relationships with others in theOrganization.

    In fact, She called management the art of

    getting things done through others

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    25/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 25

    Chester I Barnad(1886-1961):

    He believed that individual and

    organizational purposes could be kept in

    balance if the managers understood an

    employees zone of indifference- that is,

    what the employees would do without

    questioning the managers authority.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    26/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 26

    Obviously more activities fall within an

    employees zone of indifference-that is ,

    what the employees do without

    questioning the managers authority, thesmoother the organization would be.

    Companies are increasingly using teams.

    Because teams are generally self-managing, Supervisory roles are limited.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    27/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 27

    4.3: The Behavioral School:

    The behavioral school emerged partly because theclassical approach did not achieve sufficient productionefficiency and work place harmony.

    The behavioral school deal more effectively with peopleside of the Organization.

    A group of management scholars trained in sociology andpsychology and related fields help management withknowledge to propose more effective ways to managepeople in the Organization.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    28/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 28

    The human relations movement and focus

    on better human relations was highlighted

    by this School of thought.

    The Hawthorne experiments by the scholar

    Mayo were conducted at the work place to

    focus need for better working conditions to

    improve productivity and performance.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    29/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 29

    Behavioral scientists brought newdimensions to the study of Organizationand Management.

    According to Maslow, the needs that peopleare motivated to satisfy fall in to ahierarchy.

    -Physical and Safety needs--Ego needs

    -Self-actualizing needs

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    30/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 30

    Mc Gregor provided another angle on thisproblem.

    He distinguished two basic assumptions aboutpeople and their approach to work.

    These two assumptions are called Theory X andTheory Y

    Theory X assumes that people are lazy and theycan be motivated by force, money or praise.

    Theory Y assumes that people are inherentlymotivated to work and do a good job.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    31/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 31

    4.4: The Management Science School:

    Approaching the management problems

    through the use of mathematical

    techniques for their modeling, analysis and

    solution.

    The Operations research group was formed

    for this purpose.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    32/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 32

    Recent approaches:

    1.1: The System Approach:

    View the organization as a united, directed

    system of interrelated parts.1.2: The Contingency Approach:

    The view that management technique that

    best contributes to the attainment ofOrganizational goals might vary in differentsituations or circumstances.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    33/34

    D.G.,GIT,MBA-I 33

    1.3: Dynamic engagement: The view that

    time and human relationships are forcing

    management to rethink traditional

    approaches in the face of constant, rapidchange.

  • 7/29/2019 2 -Evolution of Management Theory

    34/34

    D G GIT MBA-I 34

    Any Questions?

    Thank you