2 breaker fail protection ms

Upload: lrpatra

Post on 08-Aug-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    1/48

    This document is the exclusive property of Alstom Grid and shall not betransmitted by any means, copied, reproduced or modified without the prior

    written consent of Alstom Grid Technical Institute. All rights reserved.

    GRID

    Technical Institute

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    2/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 2

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - Agenda

    Aims and Objectives Page 4

    Types of Backup Protection Page 7

    Typical Schemes Page 14

    Single Phase Considerations Page 39

    Non-conventional Techniques Page 44

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    3/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 3

    Aims & Objectives

    Duplicate:

    Protective Relays

    Trip Coils

    DC Supplies Instrument Transformers

    Not Duplicated:

    Circuit Breakers Operating Mechanism

    Hydraulic Systems

    Pneumatic Systems

    Dependability

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    4/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 4

    Aims & Objectives

    Objective:

    To Clear the Fault with:

    Minimal time delay

    Minimum disruption to the Power System

    Two forms of Backup Protection:

    Remote Backup Local Backup

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    5/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 5

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - Agenda

    Aims and Objectives Page 4

    Types of Backup Protection Page 7

    Typical Schemes Page 14

    Single Phase Considerations Page 39

    Non-conventional Techniques Page 44

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    6/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 6

    Remote Backup Protection

    Advantages

    Not affected by local station conditions

    Contributes to both relay and CB failure

    protection

    21AA B C

    Z3A

    21B

    Disadvantages

    Slow

    Sensitivity

    Limited Discrimination

    Z2AZ1A

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    7/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 7

    Remote Backup Protection

    Sensitivity Issue Affect of Fault Infeeds

    Fault

    Point

    I

    V

    B

    I1

    A

    21

    I2R1 R2

    B

    R1

    A

    21

    I1 I2R2

    I3

    Fault

    Point

    I

    V

    Effective

    Fault

    Point

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    8/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 8

    Remote Backup Protection

    Discrimination Issue Widespread Disruption

    ~

    ~

    ~

    ~

    ~

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    9/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 9

    Local Backup Protection

    Advantages

    Faster

    Improved sensitivity

    Minimises network disruption

    Disadvantages

    May be affected by local conditions

    Accidental Operations (finger trouble)

    Security

    No unwanted operations

    Dependability

    Guaranteed to operate when required

    Why ?

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    10/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 10

    Local Backup Protection

    Two types of Local Backup can be considered

    Relay Backup

    Provision of duplicated main protection schemes

    Breaker Backup

    Cannot duplicate the circuit breakers (usually)

    Can duplicate trip coils

    Still common physical mechanism failures still possible

    Breaker Failure Protection

    Used to backtrip fault infeeds in case of local break failure

    Only initiated when tripping has occurred

    Sometimes called Stuck Breaker Protection or Backtripping Protection

    Trip Circuit Supervision should be considered as part of the local backup facility

    What is it?

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    11/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 11

    Local Backup Protection

    Duplicate Protection Schemes

    CT

    MAIN 2PROTECTION

    MAIN 1PROTECTION

    CT

    CIRCUIT BREAKERMECHANISM

    AUX. DCSUPPLY

    VT

    TCS1 TCS2

    TRIP COILS

    TRIP CIRCUITSUPERVISION RELAYS

    CIRCUITBREAKER

    TC1

    TC2

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    12/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 12

    Local Backup Protection

    Duplicate Protection Additional Dependability

    Circuit A

    M2A

    M1A

    M1B

    M2B

    + -TC1A

    TC2BM2B

    TC2A

    TC1B

    -M1A

    M2A

    M1B

    Circuit B

    Cct A Trip Supply Cct B Trip Supply

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    13/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 13

    Local Backup Protection

    Duplicate Protection Schemes

    CT

    MAIN 2PROTECTION

    MAIN 1PROTECTION

    CT

    CIRCUIT BREAKERMECHANISM

    AUX. DCSUPPLY

    VT

    TCS1 TCS2

    TRIP COILS

    TRIP CIRCUIT SUPERVISION RELAYS

    CIRCUITBREAKER

    TC1

    TC2

    CB FailProtectionScheme

    Backtrip & Intertrip otherinfeeds

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    14/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 14

    Local Backup Protection

    If Breaker A fails to clear the fault,

    Circuit Breakers B, C, D and E must be

    simultaneously tripped to clear the fault

    locally

    Remote end Circuit Breaker should bedirectly tripped to prevent the fault being

    fed (if it hasnt already been opened)

    Consider Health & Safety!!

    This is the responsibility of theCB Fail protection scheme

    Backtripping and Intertripping

    E

    B A CTrip

    Fault

    MAINPROTECTION

    Intertrip

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    15/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 15

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - Agenda

    Aims and Objectives Page 4

    Types of Backup Protection Page 7

    Typical Schemes Page 17

    Single Phase Considerations Page 39

    Non-conventional Techniques Page 44

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    16/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 16

    Typical Schemes

    Simplest Scheme No Current Check

    +TC1

    Main 2

    -

    86

    Trip AdjacentCircuits & Intertrip

    2

    Main 1

    TC2CB Time (Arc

    Out)

    Prot Op.

    Protection ResetTime (Max) Error In

    TimerSafety Margin

    Setting Of Timer

    Backtrip

    Disadvantages of this simple scheme

    Long total fault clearance times due to

    long timer setting

    Security of scheme

    Risk of initiation during testing causing

    widespread system disruption

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    17/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 17

    Typical Schemes

    Simple Scheme Use of CB Auxiliary Contact

    +TC1

    Main 2

    -

    86

    Trip AdjacentCircuits & Intertrip

    2

    Main 1

    TC2CB Time (Arc

    Out)

    Prot Op.

    Error InTimer

    Safety Margin

    Setting Of Timer

    Backtrip

    Advantage of this scheme is that we dont need to considerthe main protection reset time so fault clearance time ismuch reduced

    Disadvantages of this simple scheme

    Security of scheme Risk of initiation during testing causing

    widespread system disruption

    52a

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    18/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 18

    Typical Schemes

    Simple Scheme Use of CB Auxiliary Contact

    +TC1

    Main 2

    -

    86

    Trip AdjacentCircuits & Intertrip

    2

    Main 1

    TC2CB Time (Arc

    Out)

    Prot Op.

    Safety Margin

    Setting Of Timer

    Backtrip

    Additional improvement by including the CB

    auxiliary contact in the back tripping path

    Removes timer overshoot

    Increased security of trippingBut, consider is it rational or proper to consider the

    breaker status in a CB failure protection scheme?

    52a

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    19/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 19

    Typical Schemes

    Simple Scheme Use of BF Current Detector

    +TC1

    Main 2

    -

    86

    Trip AdjacentCircuits & Intertrip

    2

    Main 1

    TC2CB Time (Arc

    Out)

    Prot Op.

    50BF ResetTime Safety Margin

    Setting Of Timer

    Backtrip

    Advantages of this scheme are:

    50BF designed for fast reset so improved total faultclearance times

    Security enhanced by two elements being required tooperate for timer initiation

    Disadvantages of this scheme

    50BF must be set greater than maximum load current(if security is to be maintained)

    50BF

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    20/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 20

    Desirable Features

    Sensitive

    Secure

    Dependable

    Fast

    Selective

    Minimise Additional Cabling

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    21/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 21

    Desirable Features

    Minimum Plant Conditions

    Fault Position

    Operation Factor (or whats instantaneous!)

    Relay Drop Off / Pick Up Ratio

    Generator Circuits

    Large Inductive Circuits

    We NEED to achieve a setting of less than full load current

    Sensitivity

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    22/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 22

    Desirable Features

    For Large Inductive Loads special circuit breakers are

    applied, utilising dual breakers:

    Main CB contacts opens first

    The resistor is used to reduce the switching

    overvoltages The auxiliary CB opens 1 or 2 cycles

    later

    BF current detector should NOT remainoperated for the resistor current IR, but

    The minimum fault level MUST takepriority (in which case the timer settingwould need to allow for auxiliary CB

    operation)

    Switching Large Inductive Loads CB Resistor Current

    LARGEINDUCTIVE

    LOAD

    IR

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    23/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 23

    Desirable Features

    If the Breaker Fail Current check is to be set below

    full load, it must only be switched into service when

    required:

    Inhibited during normal conditions

    For static type relays:

    Control application of auxiliary power to

    the 50BF relay

    For numerical relays:

    Software control

    Exact operation depends upon relay

    Current Settings below Full Load Current

    + -

    2

    86

    MAIN B.F.

    B/F

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    24/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 24

    Typical UK Current Settings

    Applies to transmission levels (400/275kV)

    In general, 20% (minimum IF of 55%)

    Generator Circuits, 5%

    Inductive Loads, 80% (20% if IF

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    25/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 25

    Breaker Fail Timer settings

    Theoretically, in order to set the BF timer we should consider:

    CB Trip Time

    Main contact seperation time (Arc Out)

    Or Resistor contact seperation time

    Current Detector

    Operation time, and

    Reset time

    Main Protection

    Reset time

    Discriminating (Safety) Margin

    Maximum permitted fault clearance times

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    26/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 26

    Timer Setting Example

    Simple Scheme Current Check before Timer

    +TC1

    Main 2

    -

    86

    Trip AdjacentCircuits & Intertrip

    50BF

    Main 1

    TC2

    2

    MainProt

    FaultOn

    ArcOut Safety

    MarginFaultCleared

    (40) (50) (10) (50)(10) (50)

    86OP

    BFResetTimerStarted

    (5)B

    BFInit

    A C D

    Breaker Fail Timer setting:

    A+C+D-B = 105msecs

    Total Fault Clearance time (of CB Fail)

    210msecs

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    27/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 27

    Timer Setting Example

    Alternative Arrangement Timer before Current Check

    +TC1

    Main 2

    -

    86

    Trip AdjacentCircuits & Intertrip

    2

    Main 1

    TC2

    50BF

    FaultCleared

    MainProt

    FaultOn

    ArcOut Safety

    Margin

    (40) (50) (50)(10) (50)

    86OP

    BFOp.

    TimerStarted

    (5)BBFInit

    A D

    Breaker Fail Timer setting:

    A+D-B = 95msecs

    Total Fault Clearance time (of CB Fail)

    200msecs

    Considerations versus Current Check first

    No Fast Reset on 50BF

    2 stage schemes more difficult to implement

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    28/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 28

    Typical 2 stage scheme

    Start Verifier or 2-stage (re-trip & backtrip) Scheme

    Advantages of 2-stage approach

    With lack of use, circuit breakers will become

    sticky

    Start verifier, re-strikes the trip coil and may

    overcome the initial reluctance of the CB to open

    First stage may be time-delayed (if preferred) but

    will extend overall fault clearance

    Disadvantages

    Breaker fail timer setting must be set longer and

    overall fault clearance time is longer

    -

    SV

    +

    TC1

    Main 1

    TC2

    SV

    50BF

    50BF

    Main 2

    Timer

    86

    52a

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    29/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 29

    Typical 2 stage scheme

    Start Verifier or 2-stage (re-trip & backtrip) Scheme

    FaultOn

    SVOp.

    (10)

    10)

    (50)

    40)

    (50)

    D

    SVInit.

    AE(5)

    MainProt

    BFInit.

    BFRESET

    86OP.

    FaultCleared

    TimerStarted

    Timer Setting=A+C+D=110msec

    Total BF Clearance Time = 225msec

    (10) (50)C

    B

    ArcOut Safety

    Margin

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    30/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 30

    Desirable Features

    Security

    Duplication with Series connections

    For example, duplicate current detectors & timers

    AND logic: 2 out of 2 Dependability

    Duplication with Parallel connections

    OR logic: 1 out of 2

    Cater for single contingency failure

    These may often be contradictory requirements so consider the scheme carefully

    Security & Dependability

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    31/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 31

    Desirable Features

    Security & Dependability-+

    50BFMainProt

    86T1B

    50BF

    T2BT1AT2A

    -T1AT1B

    +Unit DC Supply No 1

    T2AT2B

    -Unit DC Supply No 2

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    32/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 32

    Desirable Features

    Selectivity & Cabling

    Breaker fail scheme needs to:-

    Intertrip remote infeed

    Backtrip all local feeds

    Problems:

    Cabling cost Cabling complexity for all but the simplest

    schemes

    Easy to make an error

    It may be acceptable to integrate the backtripping into the

    local busbar protection

    BF BF BF

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    33/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 33

    Desirable Features

    Selectivity & Cabling Double Bus Systems

    As can be seen, lots of auxiliary contacts will be required for

    a segregated backtrip system

    Is it more secure?

    Do we duplicate the breaker fail protection scheme to

    increase dependability & security?ct A

    50BF

    MI(A)

    RI(A)

    50BF

    MI(C)

    RI(C)

    Cct C

    MI(B)

    RI(B)

    50BF

    Cct B

    TCB

    50BF(A)MI(A) MI(B)

    RI(A) RI(B)

    MI(A)

    etc.

    RI(A)

    MI(C)

    RI(C) TCC

    P ti l S h E l

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    34/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 34

    Practical Scheme Examples

    Single Busbar Scheme

    +

    BBDA

    50BF(A)

    50BF(B)

    B C

    50BF(B)

    50BF(C)

    BBCH

    50BF(A)50BFT

    (A)-1

    50BF(C)50BFT

    (B)-150BFT(C)-1

    B.B. ProtectionBuswiresNT(C)

    50BFT(C)-2

    BBTR(C)INT

    (B)

    BBTR(B)INT

    (A)

    BBTR(A)

    50BFT(A)-2

    50BFT(B)-2

    P ti l S h E l

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    35/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 35

    Practical Scheme Examples

    Main & Reserve Bar Scheme

    Main Bar

    BF

    (B)

    BF

    (A)+

    MI

    BB

    M

    BF

    (C)

    MIReserve Bar RI RIMI RIA B

    BB

    R C

    50BF(A)

    50BFT(A)

    50BF(B)50BFT

    (B)

    50BF(C)50BFT(C)

    MI

    BBTR(A)

    INT(A)

    RI

    MI RI INT(B)BB

    TR(B)MTR

    RTR

    MTR RTRMII

    50BFT(A)

    50BFT(B)

    50BFT(C)-

    MI RI

    BB

    CH

    MIRI

    Practical Scheme E amples

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    36/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 36

    Practical Scheme Examples

    Existing 275kV Breaker Fail Scheme

    +Supply 1

    TRMain 1 TC1

    TC2

    + T

    BF1 BF2

    BF1BF2

    +

    T1AT1B

    Main 2

    Supply 2TR T2A

    T2BAlarmSupply

    B.F. Defective+ T1AT2A 29M

    M R

    29R

    INT

    TR

    B.B. Prot TripBuswires

    29L

    52a

    T1B

    T2B

    CH

    -

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    37/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 37

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - Agenda

    Aims and Objectives Page 4

    Types of Backup Protection Page 7

    Typical Schemes Page 17

    Single Phase Considerations Page 39

    Non-conventional Techniques Page 44

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    38/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 38

    Single Phase Considerations

    Standard 3 phase CB Failure Scheme

    Trip AdjacentCircuits & Intertrip

    Breaker Fail Timer setting:

    A+E+C+D-B = 145msecs

    Total Fault Clearance time (of CB Fail)

    250msecs

    With Common BF initiation during single phase trpis, loadcurrent will prevent fast reset of the CB Fail current check device

    -

    86

    +

    50BFABC

    MainProtA

    Timer

    BC

    FaultOn Safety

    Margin

    (10)50) (40)

    ArcOut

    (40)

    MainProtReset

    BFAReset86OP

    FaultCleared

    (10)(50) (50)

    D

    TimerStart

    BFABCInit.

    C

    MainProt Op

    B(5)

    BFBC Reset

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    39/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 39

    Single Phase Considerations

    Alternative 3 phase CB Failure Scheme

    Trip AdjacentCircuits & Intertrip

    Breaker Fail Timer setting:

    A+C+D-B = 135msecs

    Total Fault Clearance time (of CB Fail)

    240msecs

    With Common BF initiation during single phase trpis, loadcurrent will prevent fast reset of the CB Fail current check device

    FaultOn Safety

    Margin

    (50) (40)

    ArcOut

    (40)

    MainProtReset

    BFABCOp86OP

    FaultCleared

    (10)

    (50) (50)

    D

    TimerStart BFABCInit.

    C

    MainProt Op

    B(5)

    -

    86

    +Timer

    Main ProtA

    50BFABC

    BC

    ABC

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    40/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 40

    Single Phase Considerations

    Single Phase control of current check devices required

    Breaker Fail Timer setting:

    A+C+D-B = 105msecs

    Total Fault Clearance time (of CB Fail)

    210msecs

    Phase segregated control of CB fail current check relay requiredto remove main protection reset time from setting consideration

    -

    Timer

    +BF(A)

    MainProtA

    86

    BC

    BF(B)

    BF(C)

    FaultOn Safety

    Margin

    (10)50)

    ArcOut

    (40)

    86OP

    FaultCleared

    (10)(50) (50)

    D

    TimerStart

    BFAInit.

    C

    MainProt Op

    B(5)

    BFA Reset

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    41/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 41

    Single Phase Considerations

    2-stage, Single Phase Control using a Modern 3 Phase Relay

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    42/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 42

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - Agenda

    Aims and Objectives Page 4

    Types of Backup Protection Page 7

    Typical Schemes Page 17

    Single Phase Considerations Page 39

    Non-conventional Techniques Page 44

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    43/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 43

    Non-Conventional Techniques

    Traditional CB Fail protection schemes utilise overcurrent technology Control inputs to energise the detection unit under appropriate conditions only i.e during a

    fault. This permits:

    Low current thresholds good sensitivity & speed

    Allow for good thermal withstand Need to be designed correctly to ensure:

    Fast energisation Fast resetting and very close to pick-up setting

    Can suffer extended reset times during fast fault clearance due to a decaying DC current in thesecondary circuit.

    Modern relays can achieve the same goals using different methods:

    Software control prevent operation except during fault situation, negating traditional issuesassociated with low current settings & thermal capacity

    Use of undercurrent type elements, or sampling relies on fast operation, not resetting Can account for or filter the DC currents preventing fast resetting on traditional overcurrent

    based technologies

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    44/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 44

    Non-Conventional Techniques

    At fault clearance, the flux within the core will still be at somevalue but this suggests that there is a magnetising current

    Since the primary circuit is open, this magnetising current canonly be present in the secondary circuit but it is not a sustainablestate

    The CT will attempt to reach a stable state with no magnetisingcurrent

    The transition from the point on the flux curve to the point withno magnetising current (CT remenance) will cause a decaying DCcomponent on the secondary circuit

    Due to low current settings, this may be enough to preventresetting of overcurrent elements (or operation of undercurrent

    elements)

    Decaying DC Current after Fast Fault Clearance

    A

    C

    B

    E

    D

    F

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    45/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 45

    Non-Conventional Techniques

    The algorithm looks for successive positive going and negative going excursions above a positive and

    negative current threshold. If they are both above the current threshold and of oposite sign, current

    flow is still present i.e the CB has not opened.

    Sampling Method of Current Check in CB Fail Schemes

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    46/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 46

    Non-Conventional Techniques

    In this case, the breaker fail timer is completed but the current check still indicates that the CB is

    closed. Therefore, a CB Fail condition is given.

    Sampling Method of Current Check in CB Fail Schemes

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    47/48

    ALSTOM 2010. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is provided without liability for information purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No representationor warranty is given or to be implied as to the completeness of information or fitness for any particular purpose. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without express written authority, isstrictly prohibited.

    Breaker Fail Protection Considerations - P 47

    Non-Conventional Techniques

    In this case, the breaker fail timer is completed and the current check indicates that the CB is open,

    even in the presence of the decaying DC component due to the CB opening.

    Sampling Method of Current Check in CB Fail Schemes

  • 8/22/2019 2 Breaker Fail Protection MS

    48/48

    This document is the exclusive property of Alstom Grid and shall not be

    GRID

    Technical Institute