193883462 03-part-3-pm-case-studies
TRANSCRIPT
Get Homework/Assignment Done Homeworkping.comHomework Help https://www.homeworkping.com/
Research Paper helphttps://www.homeworkping.com/
Online Tutoringhttps://www.homeworkping.com/
click here for freelancing tutoring sitesPart 3: PM CASE STUDIES
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PLANNINGP2: The yearly PM programs information for six similar gas
turbines in a power station are as follows:
1- PM information:
Maintenance levels per gas turbine
PM Type Frequency Duration No. ofWorkers
Spare parts Cost
$1000Y– Level 1 Yearly 15 days 20 10S– Level 2 6 Monthly 10 days 20 83M– Level 3 3 Monthly 5 days 15 5M– Level 4 Monthly 2 days 10 2
2- Working conditions:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 1 -
Gas turbine operating conditions: 24 hour/day Workers operating conditions: 300 day/year & 8 hour/day
3- CM information:
Average effort of CM = 380 man-day per gas turbine Average annual spare parts CM = $ 12000 per gas turbine Average CM downtime = 15 days/year per gas turbine Average downtime cost rate = $ 1000 per day
4- Cost rates:
Average labor cost rate = $ 10 per man-day Overhead cost = 25 % direct cost (spare parts & labor)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 2 -
Required:
1) The size of maintenance labor force.2) Average system availability.3) Annual downtime cost losses.4) Annual maintenance cost.5) Annual PM plan.6) Maintenance resource profiles.7) Monthly PM plans.8) Maintenance work order
The size of maintenance labor force
PM Type
AnnualFrequency
Duration(day)
No. of Worker
Man-dayper PM type
Y 1 15 20 300 * 1= 300S 1 10 20 200 * 1 = 200
3M 2 5 15 75 * 2 = 150M 8 2 10 20 * 8 = 160
Annual PM man-day per gas turbine 810
Total PM annual man-day Required 810 * 6 = 4860
The size of PM labor force = 4860/300 =16.2 = 17 workers
The size of CM labor force = 380 * 6 / 300 = 8 workers
Total labor force = 17 + 8 = 25 workers
Crew check is ok (25 more than 20).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 3 -
The average down time per year
PM Type AnnualFrequency
Duration(day)
PM Downtime(day)
Y1 15 15 * 1= 15
S 1 10 10 * 1 = 10
3M 2 5 5 * 2 = 10
M 8 2 2 * 8 = 16
PM downtime per gas turbine 51
Average down time = 51 + 15 = 66 day/year per gas turbine
Annual downtime cost losses = 66 * 6 * 1000 = $ 396000
Average equipment availability =Active operating time / Total time
= (364 – 66) / 364 = 82 %
System Reliability:Series or chain structure: Rs = R1 * R2 * R3 * … etc.Parallel structure: Rs = 1 –(1-R1)* (1-R2)* (1-R3) * .etc.
System time availability =Parallel structure: As = 1 – (1-A1)**6
= 1 – (1-0.82)**6 = 1 – (0.18)**6 = 99%
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 4 -
Annual maintenance cost
PM Type AnnualFrequency
Cost$1000
Spare parts PM Cost $1000
Y 1 10 10 * 1= 10S 1 8 8 * 1 = 8
3M 2 5 5 * 2 = 10M 8 2 2 * 8 = 16
Annual spare parts PM per gas turbine = 44Total annual spare parts PM cost = 44 * 6 = 264
The average annual spare parts CM cost =
$ 12000 * 6 = $ 72,000
Annual spare parts maintenance cost =
264000 + 72000 = $ 336,000
Annual labor cost = 25 workers * 300 day/year * $ 10 per man-day= $ 75,000
Annual direct maintenance cost = $ 336000 + $ 75000= $ 411000
Overhead cost = 25 % direct cost
Annual maintenance cost = $ 411000 * 1.25 = $ 513750
Annual maintenance cost = $ 513750Annual downtime cost losses = $ 396000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 5 -
Basic Annual PM Plan
Eq.code
Month #1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
G01 Y M M 3M M M S M M 3M M M
G02 M M Y M M 3M M M S M M 3M
G03 M 3M M M Y M M 3M M M S M
G04 S M M 3M M M Y M M 3M M M
G05 M M S M M 3M M M Y M M 3M
G06 M 3M M M S M M 3M M M Y M
Resource analysis:
Man-day 580 230 580 230 580 230 580 230 580 230 580 230
Day/month 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24
Workers 24 10 24 10 24 10 24 10 24 10 24 10
SP cost 26 18 26 18 26 18 26 18 26 18 26 18
DT 33 18 33 18 33 18 33 18 33 18 33 18
Y= 300 S= 200 3M= 75 M= 20 man-dayY= 10 S= 8 3M= 5 M= 2 $1000Y= 15 S= 10 3M= 5 M= 2 day
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 6 -
Target Annual PM Plan # 1
Eq.code
Month #1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
G01 Y M M 3M M M S M M 3M M M
G02 M M Y M M 3M M M S M M 3M
G03 M 3M M M Y M M 3M M M S M
G04 M S M M 3M M M Y M M 3M M
G05 3M M M S M M 3M M M Y M M
G06 M M 3M M M S M M 3M M M Y
Resource analysis:
Man-day 455 355 455 355 455 355 355 455 355 455 355 455
Workers 19 15 19 15 19 15 15 19 15 19 15 19
SP cost 23 21 23 21 23 21 21 23 21 23 21 23
DT 28 23 28 23 28 23 23 28 23 28 23 28
Y= 300 S= 200 3M= 75 M= 20 man-dayY= 10 S= 8 3M= 5 M= 2 $1000Y= 15 S= 10 3M= 5 M= 2 day
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 7 -
Target Annual PM Plan # 2
Eq.code
Month #1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
G01 Y M M 3M M M M S M 3M M M
G02 M M Y M M 3M M M M S M 3M
G03 M 3M M M Y M M 3M M M M S
G04 M S M 3M M M Y M M 3M M M
G05 M M M S M 3M M M Y M M 3M
G06 M 3M M M M S M 3M M M Y M
Resource analysis:
Man-day 400 410 400 410 400 410 400 410 400 410 400 410
Workers 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17
SP cost 20 24 20 24 20 24 20 24 20 24 20 24
DT 25 26 25 26 25 26 25 26 25 26 25 26
Y= 300 S= 200 3M= 75 M= 20 man-dayY= 10 S= 8 3M= 5 M= 2 $1000Y= 15 S= 10 3M= 5 M= 2 day
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 8 -
Monthly Maintenance Plan: Month # 1Day G01 G02 G03 G04 G05 G06 PM worker
1. Y 202. Y 203. Y 204. Y 205. Y 206. Y 207. Y 208. Y 209. Y 2010. Y 2011. Y 2012. Y 2013. Y 2014. Y 2015. Y 2016. SB -17. M 1018. M 1019. SB -20. M 1021. M 1022. SB -23. M 1024. M 1025. SB -26. M 1027. M 1028. SB -29. M 1030. M 1031. SB -
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 9 -
MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER010120
Requester Section:Power Station PS03 - Gas Turbine G01 - Priority: AMaintenance type/level: Annual PM1- Check ….2- Clean …..3- Replace …..4- Adjust ……5- Repair …..
Eng. Attia GomaaPlanning Section:
Labor: 4 Mech. 2 Helper 5 days 5 Elec. 4 Helper 10 daysSpare parts: 2 valve xx1, 4 air filter yy3, .. etc.Special tools: xxx, yyyy, … etc,Expected down time (from 01/01 to 15/01/2004)Cost estimation ($ 10,000)Safety instructions:- Check … Eng. Aly Ahmed
Craft Feedback:1- Check ….2- Clean …..3- Replace …..4- Adjust ……5- Repair …..Labor: 3 Mech. 2 Helper 5 days 6 Elec. 3 Helper 11 days 1 Vib. 1 Helper 2 days Spare parts: 2 valve xx1, 4 air filter yy3, .. etc.Special tools: Vibrometer, … etc,Down time (01/01 to 17/01/2004) Actual Cost ($ 12,000)
Eng. Omer AlyCoding:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 10 -
P3: The yearly PM programs information for four similar gas turbines (GT01 through GT04) in a power station are as follows:
Maintenance levels per gas turbinePM Level Frequency PM
TypeMaint.
durationNo. of
workersSpare parts
cost $1000Y – Level 1 Yearly Shutdown 14 day 20 10S – Level 2 6 Monthly Shutdown 7 day 15 83M – Level 3 3 Monthly Shutdown 4 day 10 5M– Level 4 Monthly Shutdown 2 day 8 2W – Level 5 Weekly Running 5 hours 2 --D – Level 6 Daily Running 1 hours 2 --
Gas turbine operating conditions: 24 hour/day Workers operating conditions: 300 day/year & 8 hour/day Average effort of CM = 380 man-day per gas turbine Average annual CM cost = $ 12000 per gas turbine Average CM downtime = 15 days/year per gas turbine Average downtime cost rate = $ 1000 per day Labor cost rate = $ 10 per man-day Overhead cost = 25 % direct cost (spare parts & labor)
Required:1. The size of maintenance labor force.2. Average system availability.3. Annual PM plan.4. Annual downtime cost losses.5. Annual maintenance cost.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 11 -
P4:The yearly PM programs information for six similar fire tube
boilers (FB01 through FB06) in a textile company are as
follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 12 -
Preventive Maintenance Program:Daily
(Running)Weekly
(Shutdown)Monthly
(Shutdown)S. Annually(Shutdown)
Annually(Shutdown)
Check water level
Check for tight closing of fuel valves
Inspect burnerClean low water cut-off(s)
Clean fireside surfaces
Blowdown boiler
Check fuel and air linkage
Analyze combustion
Check oil preheater Clean breeching
Blowdown water column
Check indicating lights and alarms Check cams Inspect
refractoryClean waterside surfaces
Check combustion visually
Check operating and limit controls
Inspect for flue gas leaks
Clean oil pump strainer and filter
Check oil storage tanks
Treat water according to the established program
Check safety and interlock controls
Inspect for hot spots
Clean air cleaner and air/oil separator
Check fluid levels on hydraulic valves
Record boiler operating pressure/ temperature
Check low water cutoff(s) operation
Review boiler blowdown procedures
Check pump coupling alignment
Check gauge glass
Record feed water pressure/ temperature
Check for leaks, noise, vibration, unusual conditions
Check combustion air supply
Reset combustion
Remove and recondition safety valves
Record flue gas temperature
Check operation of all motors
Check all filter elements
Inspect mercury switches
Check oil pumps
Record oil pressure and temperature
Check general burner operation
Check fuel systems Check boiler feed
pumps
Record gas pressure
Check lubricating oil levels
Check belt drives
Check condensate receivers
Record atomizing pressure
Check flame scanner assembly
Check lubrication requirements
Check chemical feed systems
Check general boiler/burner operation
Check packing glands
Tighten all electrical terminals
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 13 -
Maintenance levels per boilerPM Level Frequency Maintenance
duration (hour)No. of
workersSpare partscost $1000
Y – Level 1 Yearly 160 6 4S – Level 2 6 Monthly 60 3 2M– Level 4 Monthly 20 2 1W– Level 5 Weekly 10 2 0.5
Boiler operating conditions: 24 hour/day Workers operating conditions: 300 day/year & 8 hour/day
Average effort of CM = 250 man-hour per boiler Average annual CM cost = $ 2000 per boiler Average CM downtime = 120 hours/year per boiler
Average downtime cost rate = $ 1000 per day Labor cost rate = $ 10 per man-day Overhead cost = 25 % direct cost (spare parts & labor)
Required:
1. The size of maintenance labor force.
2. Average system availability.
3. Annual PM plan.
4. Annual downtime cost losses.
5. Annual maintenance cost.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 14 -
P5: The yearly PM programs information for some machines in a company are as follows:
M/cType
Numberof M/C
Maintenance level for each machine
Weekly Monthly YearlyMan Hour Man Hour Man Hour
Turning 6 3 3 - - 5 24Grinding 3 2 3 4 12 - -
M/cType
Maintenance Spare Parts Cost for each machine
Weekly level Monthly level Yearly levelTurning 400 - 3000Grinding 500 1600 -
(Maint. working conditions: 52 week/year, 6 day/week, 8 hr/day)
Required:
1. The size of PM labor force.
2. Annual PM cost.
3. Annual PM plan.
4. Average down time per month.
5. Average system availability.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 15 -
P6: The yearly Reliability and PM programs information for
some machines in a company are as follows:
M/cType
Numberof
M/cs
Maintenance level10 days 6 Monthly Yearly
W D O W D O W D OLath 4 3 1 10 4 2 20 5 4 20
Drilling 2 2 1 10 4 2 20 - - -
Grinding 1 - - - 3 2 20 3 3 20
W: Number of workers D: Maint. duration (day) O: Oil (liter)
- Working conditions:
Operating: 52 week/year, 6 day/week, two shifts
Manpower: 45 week/year, 6 day/week, one shift
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 16 -
T0.95
T0.9
D0.95
D0.8
T0.9
T0.8
G0.9
Annual CM analysis per machine Lath Drilling Grinding
Average Manpower (workers) 2 2 2Average oil quantity (liter) 100 60 80Average Spar parts costs ($/year) 2000 1000 1000Average Down time (day/year) 20 12 10
- Oil cost is $ 5 /liter- Average labor rate is $ 10 / man-hour- Average Indirect costs (or Overhead) are 40 % direct
maintenance cost- Average down time cost rate of the PM is $ 100 / machine-
hour, whereas that of CM is $ 300 / machine-hour.
Required:1. The size of maintenance labor force.2. Annual oil quantity.3. Annual maintenance budget.4. Annual maintenance plan with the best manpower
profile.5. Annual down time for each machine.6. Average availability for each machine.7. Annual down time cost for each type. 8. System availability. 9. System reliability.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 17 -
P7: The yearly PM programs information for a production
line in a shop are as follows:
M/c Type
Numberof
machines
PM Maintenance levels per machine10 days 6 Monthly Yearly
Man Day Man day Man dayTurning 3 3 1 4 2 5 4Milling 2 2 1 - - 4 3Drilling 1 2 1 4 2 - -Grinding 1 - - 3 2 3 3
M/c Type PM Spar parts and materials cost (L.E.)
10 days 6 Monthly YearlyTurning 400 1500 3000Milling 600 - 4000Drilling 500 1600 -Grinding - 1000 2000
- Working conditions:Production & maintenance 52 week/year, 6 day/week, two
shifts.Manpower 45 week/year, 6 day/week, one shift.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 18 -
T Standby
T T M
M Standby
D G
- Average labor rate is 10 L.E./ man-hour
- Average other costs are 40 % direct maintenance cost
- Average CM Spare parts costs are 15 % PM spar parts
costs.
- Average CM manpower are 30 % PM manpower.
- Average down time cost rate is 100 L.E./machine-hour.- Average CM down times per machine (day /year) are as follows:
Machine Turning Milling Drilling Grinding
Down time 15 10 12 8
Required:
1. The size of maintenance labor force.
2. Annual maintenance cost.
3. Annual maintenance plan with the best manpower
profile.
4. Average down time for each machine type.
5. Average availability for each machine type.
6. Average system availability
7. Average down time cost for each machine type.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 19 -
MAINTENANCE FORECASTING
Y = a + b X
Sum Y = n . a + b Sum X , Sum XY = a Sum X + b Sum X2
Measuring the accuracy of forecasting:1- Coefficient of correlation
r =( n Sum XY - Sum X Sum Y) / ( n Sum X2 – (Sum X) 2 ) 0.5 ( n Sum Y2 – (Sum Y) 2 ) 0.5
2- Mean Absolute Deviation
MAD = sum | A – F | / (n -1)
3- Mean Squared Error
MSE = sum (A – F)2 / (n -1)
Controlling the forecast:
CLs = 0 ± Z S
S = Standard deviation of the distribution of errors = MSE
Z = 3 99.7% of the values can be expected.Z = 2 95.5% of the values can be expected.Z = 1 68.5% of the values can be expected.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 20 -
0
P8: Maintenance spare parts cost ($):
Year1999
Year2000
Year2001
Year2002
Exp.2003
Forecasting limits2003
1450 1300 1200 1000 ? ?
X 1 2 3 4 5Y 1450 1300 1200 1000 ?
XY 1450 2600 3600 4000
n = 4Sum X = 10 Sum X2 = 30Sum Y = 4950 Sum XY = 11650
Sum Y = n . a + b Sum X , Sum XY = a Sum X + b Sum X2
4950 = 4 a + 10 b 11650 = 10 a + 30 b14850 = 12 a + 30 b
a = 1600 b = - 145
Y = 1600 – 145 X Y5 = 1600 – 145 (5) = 875
X 1 2 3 4 5A 1450 1300 1200 1000 -F 1445 1310 1165 1020 875
(A-F) 5 10 35 20(A-F)2 25 100 1225 400
MSE = 1750 / (4 -1) = 583S = 24 Z = 2
CLs = 0 ± Z S = 0 ± 48
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 21 -
P9: An casting company has the following yearly production and overhead
cost data:
Year 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03Production quantity(1000 ton)
5.2 5.5 6.0 6.4 6.5 7.0 7.5 7.9
Maintenance cost (M L.E.)
1.3 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.5 3.0
Required:1) Plot the maintenance cost vs. production quantities?
2) Estimate and plot a trend for the maintenance cost and
production quantities?
3) Compute the maintenance cost forecast for year 2004, if the
production plan is 8,500 tons?
4) Find the unit maintenance fixed cost and unit maintenance
variable cost, for the year 2003?
5) Measure and discuss the accuracy of the maintenance cost
forecasts using both the correlation coefficient and mean
absolute deviation?
6) Develop and discuss a forecasting control chart with 99.7%
and 95.5% confidence levels (probability of expected
values)?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 22 -
P10 :
Uncertain spare parts cost
Spare parts cost
$ 100,000
Probability
%
9 20
10 50
11 20
12 7
13 3
Estimate the spare parts budget based on the following:
1- Average method ($ 1,100,000)
2- Probability method ($ 1,023,000)
3- PERT method ($ 1,033,000)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 23 -
MONTHLY M. PLANNING USING CPM
P11: The monthly PM programs information for a machining shop are as follows:
Machine Code
T01 D01 M01 T02 M02
Machine Description
Turning Drilling Milling Turning Milling
Predecessors - - - T01 M01Duration (day)
8 5 6 8 20
Worker/day 5 8 7 5 5Spare Parts cost $ 1000
5 4 3 6 12
Required:
1. If the maximum worker limit is 12 worker/day,
construct the corresponding monthly maintenance
plan.
2. Calculate the monthly spare parts cost.
3. Construct the monthly spare parts cost profile.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 24 -
P12: The monthly PM programs information for a machining shop are as follows:
Machine Code
T01 D01 M01 T02 D02 M02 M03
Machine Description
Turning Drilling Milling Turning Drilling Milling Milling
Predecessor - - - T01 D01 M01 M02Duration (day)
8 4 6 8 5 8 12
Worker/day 5 6 7 5 6 5 5Spare Parts cost $ 1000
2 1.5 3 4 2 4 5
Required:
1. If the maximum worker limit is 12 worker/day,
construct the corresponding monthly
maintenance plan.
2. Calculate the monthly spare parts cost.
3. Construct the monthly spare parts cost profile.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 25 -
CAPITAL MAINTENANCE (OVERHAUL) PLANNING USING CPM
P13: A Bus company has about 1500 bus. The capital maintenance and engine overhaul is carrying out after about 250,000 to 300,000 km (about two years) and its duration is about 10 day. The overhaul information for each bus engine are as follows:
Activity ID A B C D E F G HPredecessors - - - - B & D C F E & GDuration (day) 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 2Worker/day 4 2 3 2 4 3 1 1
Average spare parts cost = 10,000 L.E./Bus.Average labor cost rate = 20 L.E./man-dayIndirect cost rate = 50 L.E./dayDown time cost rate = 300 L.E./Bus-day
Required:1. Construct the bus overhaul plan, If the maximum
worker limit for each overhaul is 6 worker/day.2. Construct the Annual maintenance plan for all
buses.3. Calculate the size of maintenance labor force.4. Comparison between the current and developed
maintenance planning systems.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 26 -
P14: Monthly Maintenance Plan for Wire Production Line
Project Name : MMPW Project start: 1 Jan. 2004Planning unit : Day 6 DAYS /WEEK
1- Activity List
Activity ID Duration (day) Predece
ssors
Relations(SS, FS, FF, and SF)
1 Preparation PRP 2 - -2 Mech. maintenance # 01 MM1 7 PRP -3 Elec. maintenance # 01 EM1 9 M
M1
SS 3
4 Mech. maintenance # 02 MM2 6 PRP -5 Elec. maintenance # 02 EM2 8 MM2 SS 26 Mech. maintenance # 03 MM3 5 PRP -7 Elec. maintenance # 03 EM3 7 MM3 SS 28 Setup STP 1 EM1
EM2EM3
-
2- Resource List
ResourceCode
Resources description Unit Limits/day PriceLE/unitNorm. Max.
L01 Mechanical worker md 3 6 40L02 Electrical worker md 4 8 60SPS Spare parts & supplies cost - - 1000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 27 -
W01 9 W02 6 W03 3 2
3- Resource Allocation
Activity IDResource
L01/day
L02/day
SPS(Total)
1 Preparation PRP 2 1 12 Mech. maintenance # 01 MM1 4 - 33 Elec. maintenance # 01 EM1 - 5 44 Mech. maintenance # 02 MM2 3 - 25 Elec. maintenance # 02 EM2 - 4 36 Mech. maintenance # 03 MM3 2 - 27 Elec. maintenance # 03 EM3 - 3 38 Setup STP 2 2 1
4- Base Calendar (Working periods)Saturday Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
X X X X X X1/01/04
Holidays: 20 to 21 Jan. 2004Required:
1. Draw the project network (logic diagram)?2. Draw the corresponding Gantt chart?3. Construct the corresponding smoothed worker
loading?4. Construct the corresponding worker leveling?5. Construct the target action plan?.6. Construct the cost profile & S-curve?7. Construct the target master plan?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 28 -
P15: Annual Maintenance Plan for AUC-IT Labs.
Project Name : AMIT Project start: 1 Jan. 2004Planning unit : Day 6 DAYS /WEEK
1- Activity List
Activity ID Duration (day)
Predecessors
Relations
1 Preparation PRP 1 - -2 Server maintenance SRM 3 PRP -3 Hardware maintenance
Lab #01HM1 4 SRM -
4 Software maintenance Lab #01
SM1 5 HM1 SS 2
5 Hardware maintenance Lab #02
HM2 3 SRM -
6 Software maintenance Lab #02
SM2 4 HM2 SS 1
7 Hardware maintenance Lab #03
HM3 3 SRM -
8 Software maintenance Lab #03
SM3 4 HM3 SS 1
9 Setup STP 1 SM1SM2SM3
-
2- Resource ListResourceCode
Resources description Unit Limits/day PriceLE/unitNorm. Max.
L01 Hardware Engineer md 3 6 120L02 Software Engineer md 4 8 100SPS Spare parts & supplies cost - - 1000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 29 -
3- Resource Allocation
Activity IDResource
L01/day
L02/day
SPS(Total)
1 Preparation PRP 2 1 12 Server maintenance SRM 1 1 13 Hardware maintenance
Lab #01HM1 4 - 2
4 Software maintenance Lab #01
SM1 - 5 3
5 Hardware maintenance Lab #02
HM2 3 - 1
6 Software maintenance Lab #02
SM2 - 4 2
7 Hardware maintenance Lab #03
HM3 2 - 1
8 Software maintenance Lab #03
SM3 - 3 2
9 Setup STP 2 2 1
4- Base Calendar (Working periods)Saturday Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
X X X X X X 1/01/04Holidays: 20 to 21 Jan. 2004
Required:1. Draw the project network (logic diagram)?2. Draw the corresponding Gantt chart?3. Construct the corresponding smoothed worker loading?4. Construct the corresponding worker leveling?5. Construct the target action plan?.6. Construct the cost profile & S-curve?7. Construct the target master plan?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 30 -
MATERIALS REQUIREMENTS PLANNING (MRP) FOR MAINTENANCE
P16:A monthly maintenance plan for 50 similar equipment
to replace the gear box for these equipment. The gear box
structure is shown below.
Component A B C D E F G
Lead time (week) 1 2 1 1 2 3 2
On-Hand 10 15 20 10 10 5 0
Required:1. Time-phased for the gear box structure2. Gross requirements plan for 50 gear box3. Net material requirements plan for 50 gear box.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 31 -
A
B(2) C(2)
D(2) E(2) E(2) F(2)
G(1) D(2)
CM CAPACITY PLANNING USING WAITING LINES MODELS
P17: A maintenance service facility has Poisson arrival
rates, negative exponential service times, and operates on a
first-come first-served queue discipline. Breakdowns occur
on an average of = three per day with a range of zero to
eight. The maintenance crew can service an average of =
six machines per day with a range of from zero to seven.
Find the following:
1) Utilization factor of the service facility.
2) Percent idle time % I
3) Mean time in the system Ts
4) Mean number in the system Ns
5) Mean Waiting time Tw
6) Mean number in the queue Nq
7) Probability of finding n=2 machines in the system
8) Probability of finding n=4 machines in the system
9) Probability of finding n=6 machines in the system
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 32 -
Solution
1) Utilization factor of the service facility =
= Mean arrival rate / Mean service rate
= / = 3 / 6 = 50 %
2) Percent idle time % I =
% I = (Total) - (Utilization factor)
= 100 – 50 = 50 %
3) Mean time in the system Ts =
Ts = 1 / (Mean service rate – Mean arrival rate)
= 1 / ( - ) = 1 / (6 – 3) = 1/3 day
4) Mean number in the system Ns =
Ns = (Mean time in system) (Mean arrival rate)
= / ( - )= 3 / (6 – 3) = 1 machine
5) Mean Waiting time Tw------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 33 -
Maintenance service facility
Mean arrival
rate
= 3, {0,8}
Mean service
rate = 6, {0,7}
Tw = Total time in system – Service time
= {1/( - )} – { 1/ }
= {1/(6 - 3)} – { 1/6 } = 1/6 day
6) Mean number in the queue Nq =
= (Mean number in system)-(Mean number being served)
= { / ( - )} – {/}
= {3 / (6 – 3)} - {3/6} = 1/2 machine
7) Probability of finding n=2 machines in the system
Pn = (1 - /) (/)n = (1 - 3/6) (3/6)2 = 0.125
8) Probability of finding n=4 machines in the system
Pn = (1 - /) (/)n = (1 - 3/6) (3/6)4 = 0.03125
9) Probability of finding n=6 machines in the system
Pn = (1 - /) (/)n = (1 - 3/6) (3/6)6 = 0.0078
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 34 -
P18: A maintenance service facility has Poisson arrival
rates, negative exponential service times, and operates on a
first-come first-served queue discipline. Breakdowns occur
on an average of = five per day with a range of zero to
nine. The maintenance crew can service an average of =
six machines per day with a range of from zero to eight.
Find the following:
1. Utilization factor of the service facility.
2. Percent idle time % I
3. Mean time in the system Ts
4. Mean number in the system Ns
5. Mean Waiting time Tw
6. Mean number in the queue Nq
7. Probability of finding n=2 machines in the system
8. Probability of finding n=4 machines in the system
9. Probability of finding n=6 machines in the
system
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 35 -
P19:
The CM information for a production department are as
follows:
1. Labor maintenance cost rate = $10/hr
2. Downtime cost rate = $50/hr per machine.
3. The mean number of failures is four/hr, and distributed
according to a Poisson distribution.
4. The mean number of repairs is six repairs per worker-
hour, and distributed exponentially
What is the best maintenance crew size?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 36 -
Solution
Crew
Size
Ns =
/ ( -
)
Labor
cost
$/hr
Downtime
cost
$/hr
Total
cost
$/hr
1 6 2.00 10 100.00 110
2 12 0.50 20 25.00 45
3 18 0.29 30 14.29 44.29
4 24 0.20 40 10.00 50.00
5 30 0.15 50 7.69 57.69
The best maintenance crew size is 3 workers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 37 -
Maintenance service facility
Mean arrival rate = 4, Poisson
Labor cost = $10/hr
Downtime cost = $50/hr/machine
Mean service rate
= 6 /worker, Exp.
Crew Size?
P20:
The CM information for a production department are as
follows:
5. Labor maintenance cost rate = $20/hr
6. Downtime cost rate = $150/hr per machine.
7. The mean number of failures is five/hr, and distributed
according to a Poisson distribution.
8. The mean number of repairs is five repairs per worker-
hour, and distributed exponentially
What is the best maintenance crew size?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 38 -
P21:
The CM information for a production department is as
follows:
Labor maintenance cost rate = $20/hr
Downtime cost rate = $150/hr per machine.
The mean number of failures is five/hr, and distributed
according to a Poisson distribution.
The mean number of repairs is five repairs per worker-hour,
and distributed exponentially
Required:
1. Determine the best maintenance crew size?
2. Calculate the utilization factor of the maintenance
crew?
3. Determine the mean time in the system?
4. Calculate the probability of finding two machines in the
system?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 39 -
P22:A factory has 200 machines and the maintenance
engineer supervises the repair crews who repair
malfunctioning machines. The maintenance policy is to
repair the broken down machine and bring back in
production within 2 hours on the average. If average
breakdown rate is 3.5 machines/hour and each repair
crew can repair 0.25 machine per hour on the average.
How many repair crews are required ?
The formula for average repair rate () is
1ts = ---------- or = + 1/ ts -
Where = repair rate
= arrival rate of malfunctioning machines
ts = average time arrivals in the system
Required average repair rate
= 3.5 + 1 / 2 = 4 machines / hour
No. of Crews =
¸ machines/hour a crew can repair
=
4 ¸ 0.25 = 16 repair crews required
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 40 -
MAINTENANCE WORK CONTROL USING CONTROL CHARTS
P23: The weekly backlog data for the mechanical section of
the maintenance department are given as follows in terms of
labor-hours for the last four months:
Number Month Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4
1
2
3
4
March
April
May
June
360
340
420
390
320
350
412
370
300
320
452
350
380
380
380
410
Determine and plot the control chart for the weekly backlog. (For n = 4, d2 = 2.059.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 41 -
SPARE PARTS COST CONTROL
P24: The monthly plan and the actual maintenance spare parts in ABC Company are as follows:
Spare part #
Plan (Jan. 2001) Actual (Jan. 2001)Planned quantity
(unit)
Standard cost
(L.E./unit)
Actual quantity
(unit)
Actual cost(L.E./unit)
A11 40 1000 40 1100A12 30 1200 20 1200A13 50 900 40 1000A14 20 850 10 800A15 20 950 20 900
Based on these data, determine the different performance
indicators.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 42 -
TOTAL MAINTENANCE CONTROL
P25:Monthly production information on Foundry Shop FS510 was as follows:Item January
2004February2004
Working days 31 28Standard production rate (ton/hr) 8 8Average daily time (hr/day) 24 24Average down time (hr/day) 6 4Average standby (hr/day) 3 3Average target quantity (ton/day) 120 136Average actual quantity (ton/day) 80 105Average sound quantity (ton/day) 70 98Average defect quantity (ton/day) 10 7Average energy consumption (1000 kwh/day) 49 67Material cost (1000 L.E/day) 100 130
Required:1. Equipment avaliability.2. Equipment performance efficiency.3. Equipment utilization factor.4. Equipment quality rate5. Equipment uptime ratio.6. Energy productivity.7. Material productivity8. Overall equipment effectiveness (OEE).9. Total effective equipment productivity (TEEP).
10. Net equipment effectiveness (NEE).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 43 -
Basic dataItem January
2004February2004
Feb. / Jan.
Production rate (ton/hr) 8 8 100 %
Total time (hr/day) 24 24 100 %
Average down time(hr/day)
6 4 67 %
Average available time (hr)
18 20 111 %
Average standby (hr/day)
3 3 100 %
Average used time(hr/day)
15 17 113 %
Average target quantity (ton/day)
120 136 113 %
Average actual quantity (ton/day)
80 105 125 %
Average sound quantity (ton/day)
70 98 129 %
Average defect quantity (ton/day)
10 (14%)
7(7%)
64 %
Energy productivity (kwh/ton)
700 684 98%
Material productivity (1000 L.E/ton)
1429 1326 92%
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 44 -
Performance EvaluationIndicator January
2004February2004
Feb. / Jan.
Availability 18/24= 75 % 20/24= 83 % 111 %
Performance efficiency
80/120= 67 % 105/136= 77 % 115 %
Quality rate 70/80= 88 % 98/105= 93 % 106 %
Utilization ratio 15/18= 83 % 17/20= 85 % 102 %
Uptime (hr/day) 70/8= 8.75 98/8= 12.25 140 %
Uptime ratio 8.75/15= 49% 12.25/17=72 % 147 %
OEE 44 % 60 % 136 %
TEEP 37 % 51 % 138 %
NEE 29 % 52 % 179 %
Energy productivity (kwh/ton)
700 684 98%
Material productivity (1000 L.E/ton)
1429 1326 92%
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 45 -
P26:The six-monthly maintenance costs ($1000) for a productive system are as follows:
Target Costs:
Cost item Month #Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jly
PM Cost: Spar parts Labor
10050
10050
10050
10050
10050
10050
10050
CM Cost: Spar parts Labor
200150
200150
200150
200150
200150
200150
200150
DT Cost 300 300 300 300 300 300 300
Actual Costs:
Cost item Month #Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jly
PM Cost: Spar parts Labor
2332
3865
4996
5694
6894
6590
5472
CM Cost: Spar parts Labor
231503
213370
181293
185164
199201
196193
157142
DT Cost 407 397 320 290 330 320 362
Based on these data, determine the different performance evaluation indicators for the maintenance system.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 46 -
Target:
Cost item Month #Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jly Total
PM Cost 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 1050
CM Cost 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 2450
TM Cost 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 5600
DT Cost 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 2100
TM+DT 1100 1100 1100 1100 1100 1100 1100 7700
PM/TM 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.955
CM/PM 2.33 2.33 2.33 2.33 2.33 2.33 2.33 16.33
Actual:
Cost item Month #Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jly Total
PM Cost 55 103 145 150 162 155 126 896CM Cost 734 583 474 349 400 369 299 320
8TM Cost 1196 1083 939 789 892 864 787 655
0DT Cost 407 397 320 290 330 320 362 242
6TM+DT 1603 1480 1259 1079 1222 1184 1149 897
6PM/TM 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.16 1.00
7CM/PM 13.35 5.66 3.27 2.33 2.47 2.38 2.37 31.8
2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 47 -
Change %:
Cost item Month #Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jly Total
PM Cost CM CostTM CostDT CostTM+DTPM/TMCM/PM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 48 -
P27:
The yearly PM programs information for six similar gas turbines in a power station are as follows:
Target work performed:
Item PM CM TotalTotal labor force (worker) 18 7 25Annual spare parts cost ($1000) 264 72 336Annual labor cost ($1000) -- -- 75Overhead cost ($1000) -- -- 514Average down time(day/year per gas turbine)
51 15 66
Average downtime cost rate = $ 1000 per day
Actual work performed:
Item PM CM TotalTotal labor force (worker) 20 10 30Annual spare parts cost ($1000) 300 100 400Annual labor cost ($1000) -- -- 80Overhead cost ($1000) -- -- 520Average down time(day/year per gas turbine)
45 5 50
Based on these data, determine the different performance evaluation indicators for the maintenance system.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 49 -
Performance Evaluation Sheet:
Item Target Actual Change %
Total labor force (worker) 25 30 + 20
Annual s. parts cost
($1000)336 400 + 19
Annual labor cost ($1000) 75 80 + 6.6
Overhead cost ($1000) 514 520 + 1.2
Total m. cost ($1000) 925 1000 + 8.1
Average down time 66 50 - 24.3
Down time cost ($1000) 66 50 - 24.3
TMC + DTC 991 1050 + 6.0
Availability % 81.9 86.3 + 5.3
CM/PM % (labor force) 7/18 =38.9
10/20 =50
+ 28.5
CM/PM % (Spare parts) 72/264 =27.3
100/300 =33.3
+ 22.0
Overhead % 514/411=1.25
520/480=1.08
- 13.6
Labor productivity %(worker/gas turbine)
25/6=4.17
30/6=5.00
- 16.6
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 50 -
P28:The six-monthly maintenance costs ($1000) for a productive system are as follows:
Target Costs:
Cost item Month #Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jly
PM Cost: Spar parts Labor
100 50
100 50
100 50
100 50
100 50
100 50
100 50
CM Cost: Spar parts Labor
200150
200150
200150
200150
200150
200150
200150
DT Cost 300 300 300 300 300 300 300
Actual Costs:
Cost item Month #Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jly
PM Cost: Spar parts Labor
2332
3865
4996
5694
6894
6590
5472
CM Cost: Spar parts Labor
231503
213370
181293
185164
199201
196193
157142
DT Cost 407 397 320 290 330 320 362
Based on these data, determine the different performance evaluation indicators for the maintenance system.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 51 -
Target:
Cost item Month #
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jly
PM Cost 150 150 150 150 150 150 150CM Cost 350 350 350 350 350 350 350DT Cost 300 300 300 300 300 300 300TM Cost 800 800 800 800 800 800 800
Actual:
Cost itemMonth #
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jly
PM Cost 55 103 145 150 162 155 126CM Cost 734 583 474 349 400 369 299DT Cost 407 397 320 290 330 320 362TM Cost 1196 1083 939 789 892 864 787
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 52 -
P29: The monthly budget and the actual maintenance cost for XXX Company are as follows:
Cost itemStandard Actual
Quantity Rate Quantity Rate
Spare parts 20,00
ton
6000
L.E.
15,00
ton
6400
L.E.
Direct labor 40,000
hour
15
L.E.
45,000
hour
18
L.E.
Indirect materials 150,000 L.E. 180,000 L.E.
Indirect labor 100,000 L.E. 80,000 L.E.
Fixed overhead 300,000 L.E. 350,000 L.E.
Based on these data, determine the different performance
indicators.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 53 -
P30:
The annual budget and the actual maintenance cost for XXX production department are as follows:
Cost item (L.E.)
Budget Actual
Current
month
Year to
date
Current
month
Year to
date
Direct labor 6000 60000 5000 65000
Indirect labor 5936 53834 4111 58834
Spare parts 2000 12000 700 10000
Indirect materials 1000 10000 500 5000
Other overheads 1000 10000 1200 12000
Based on these data, determine the different performance
indicators.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 54 -
P31:Maintenance Planning for Spare Parts Work Shop
1- Equipment List
Plant Systems
Location Equipment Type Number of Machines
Productive systems
Machining shop
Turning Milling DrillingGrindingPress
42221
Foundry shop
Induction furnacesMolding machines
25
Welding shop
Arc Welding 1
Supportive systems
Material handling
Fork lift 4
Air room Compressor 2Water room Pump – 50 HP
Pump – 100 HP22
Power room
Diesel generator 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 55 -
2- Layout of machining shop
3- Equipment reliability
4- Equipment PM Program for machining shop
4-1- PM Manpower & Downtime:
Eq. Type Weekly Monthly 6 Monthly YearlyMan Hr Man Hr Man Hr Man Hr
Turning 2 5 3 16 - - 5 24Milling 2 5 3 12 - - 5 16Drilling 1 3 - - 2 10 3 12Grinding 2 3 - - 3 12 3 16Press 1 2 - - 2 6 3 12
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 56 -
T T
T T
M
M
D
D
G
G
T0.9
T0.9
M0.8
M0.8
T0.9
T0.9
D0.8
D0.8
G0.9
G0.9
4-2- PM Spare Parts & Supplies:
Eq. Type Weekly Monthly 6 Monthly YearlyB O B O B O B O
Turning - 3 - 5 - - 4 12Milling - 2 - 4 - - 4 10Drilling - 1 - - 4 6 4 8Grinding - 1 - - 4 8 4 8Press - 1 - - 4 6 4 8
B : Bearing O: Oil (liter)4-3- PM Cost:
Average labor rate $ 10 / hour
Spare Parts & Supplies cost:Bearing $ 50 /unit & Oil $ 5 /liter
Other costs (Indirect or Overhead) 40 % PM
5- Failure Analysis for the last year (CM)
Average per equipment
Turning Milling Drilling Grinding Press
Man-hour 100 60 40 50 30Down time hr 50 40 30 40 30Spare parts cost $
1000 800 500 600 500
Oil (liter) 20 15 12 16 106- Working conditions:Machine Working conditions:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 57 -
2 shifts/day, 8 hr./shift, 6 day/week, 45 week/year.
Manpower working conditions: 8 hr./day, 6 day/week, 45 week/year.
II- Maintenance Planning ElementsRequired:1. Equipment coding.2. Equipment priorities.3. Maintenance labor force.4. Spare parts & supplies requirement planning.5. Annual maintenance cost.6. Equipment average down time per month.7. Equipment average time availability.8. System average down time per month.9. System average time availability10. System reliability11. Annual PM plans.12. Annual man-hours & manpower profile 13. Monthly PM plans.14. Maintenance Work orders
----------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies - 58 -