1833-51 workshop on understanding and evaluating...

203
1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical Measurement Uncertainty P. De FELICE 5 - 16 November 2007 ENEA-INMRI Istituto Nazionale di Metrologia delle Radiazioni Ionizzanti C.R. Casaccia P.O. Box 2400 I-00100 Rome Italy Uncertainty in Gamma Spectrometry.

Upload: others

Post on 20-May-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

1833-51

Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating RadioanalyticalMeasurement Uncertainty

P. De FELICE

5 - 16 November 2007

ENEA-INMRIIstituto Nazionale di Metrologia delle Radiazioni Ionizzanti

C.R. Casaccia P.O. Box 2400I-00100 Rome

I t a l y

Uncertainty in Gamma Spectrometry.

Page 2: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.1/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

UNCERTAINTY IN GAMMA SPECTROMETRYUNCERTAINTY IN GAMMA SPECTROMETRYP. De P. De FeliceFelice

ENEAENEA--INMRIINMRI

IstitutoIstituto NazionaleNazionale didi MetrologiaMetrologia delledelle RadiazioniRadiazioni IonizzantiIonizzanti

C.R.C.R. CasacciaCasaccia, P.O. Box 2400, I, P.O. Box 2400, I--00100, Rome, Italy00100, Rome, Italy

[email protected]@casaccia.enea.it

International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP)International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP)

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)

Workshop on Understanding and EvaluatingWorkshop on Understanding and Evaluating

RadioanalyticalRadioanalytical Measurement UncertaintyMeasurement Uncertainty

MiramareMiramare, Trieste, Italy,, Trieste, Italy,

1212--13 November 200713 November 2007

Page 3: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.2/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Worksop on Understanding and EvaluatingWorksop on Understanding and Evaluating

RadioanalyticalRadioanalytical Measurement UncertaintyMeasurement Uncertainty

TIME TABLETIME TABLE

UNCERTAINTY IN GAMMA SPECTROMETRYUNCERTAINTY IN GAMMA SPECTROMETRY

MODULE TITLE TIME DURATION

1 • Metrology, measurement fundamentals

o Quantity of interest in gamma spectrometry

o Relative and absolute measurements

o Instrument calibration

o Efficiency transfero Nuclear data

12/11/07 8:30-10:30 2:00

2 • Uncertainty evaluation theoryo Fundamentals

o Statistical quantitieso Statistics applied to counting

o Uncertainty propagation

12/11/07 11:00-12:30 1:30

3 • Uncertainty components in gamma spectrometry

4 • Methods for uncertainty determination

5 • Applications, Exercises, Examples, Discussion 12/11/07 14:00-16:45 2:45

6

7

• Characteristic limits

o Theory

o Application to gamma spectrometry

• Quality control

13/11/07 8:30-10:30 2:00

8 • Discussion with participants 13/11/07 11:00-12:30 2:30

Page 4: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.3/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

GraphicalGraphicalillustration of illustration of

values, error, and values, error, and uncertaintyuncertainty

[ISO (1993), Guide to the [ISO (1993), Guide to the

expression of uncertainty]expression of uncertainty]

Page 5: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.4/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Mathematical expressionsMathematical expressions

Error propagation lawError propagation law

),cov(2

),...,,(

2

1

2

2

21

ji

p

ki ji

x

p

i i

Y

p

xxx

f

x

fS

x

fS

xxxfY

i ∑∑<= ∂

∂∂∂

+⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

∂∂

=

=

)()(1

1),cov(

)(1

1

1

1

22

jjk

n

k

iikji

n

k

iikx

xxxxn

xx

xxn

Si

−−−

=

−−

=

=

=

Sample estimatesSample estimates

2),cov(,...)(

,...)(z

jiji

jj

iiS

z

x

z

xxx

zxx

zxx

∂∂

=⇒⎭⎬⎫

⎩⎨⎧

=

=

⎪⎪⎭

⎪⎪⎬

⎪⎪⎩

⎪⎪⎨

−=∂∂

=∂∂

⇒=

22

1

1

2

1

11

1

xx

Y

Y

xx

Y

Y

x

xY

Useful expressionsUseful expressions

2

2

2

1

2

21

21

2

1

21

0),cov(⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛+⎟⎟

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛=⎟

⎞⎜⎝

⎛⇒

⎪⎪⎪

⎪⎪⎪

⎪⎪⎪

⎪⎪⎪

=

=

=

X

S

X

S

Y

S

xx

xxY

x

xY

XXY

)(

)()(

i

iii

i xf

xfxxf

x

f −∆+≈

∂∂

Page 6: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.5/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

The following quantities are required The following quantities are required for uncertainty evaluation:for uncertainty evaluation:

),cov(2

),...,,(

2

1

2

2

21

ji

p

ki ji

x

p

i i

Y

p

xxx

f

x

fS

x

fS

xxxfY

i ∑∑<= ∂

∂∂∂

+⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

∂∂

=

=

),cov(

),...,,(

2

21

ji

x

i

p

xx

S

x

f

xxxfY

i

∂∂

= Obtained by measurement, Obtained by measurement, calculation, estimation, calculation, estimation,

importation, derivation, importation, derivation,

A MODEL IS NEEDED !A MODEL IS NEEDED !

Page 7: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.6/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

ReferencesReferences

ISOISO GUMGUM

K.K. DebertinDebertin, R. G. , R. G. HelmerHelmer, "Gamma, "Gamma-- and Xand X--Ray Ray Spectrometry with Semiconductor Detectors", North Spectrometry with Semiconductor Detectors", North Holland, Amsterdam, 1988.Holland, Amsterdam, 1988.

TsoulfanidisTsoulfanidis N. (1983), N. (1983), Measurement and Detection of Measurement and Detection of radiationradiation , Hemisphere Publishing Corporation;, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation;

NCRP REPORT n.58 (1985), NCRP REPORT n.58 (1985), A Handbook of radioactivity A Handbook of radioactivity measurements proceduresmeasurements procedures

Articles on JournalsArticles on Journals

ENEAENEA--INMRI laboratory resultsINMRI laboratory results

Page 8: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.7/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

WorksopWorksop onon UnderstandingUnderstanding andand EvaluatingEvaluating

RadioanalyticalRadioanalytical MeasurementMeasurement UncertaintyUncertainty

UNCERTAINTY IN GAMMA UNCERTAINTY IN GAMMA SPECTROMETRYSPECTROMETRY

1. Metrology, measurement fundamentals

2. Uncertainty evaluation theory

3. Uncertainty components in gamma spectrometry

4. Methods for uncertainty determination

5. Application, exercises, Examples, Discussion

6. Characteristic limits

7. Quality control

8. Discussion with participants

Page 9: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.8/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

QUANTITY OF INTEREST IN GAMMA QUANTITY OF INTEREST IN GAMMA

SPECTROMETRYSPECTROMETRY

Page 10: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.9/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Main quantities ofMain quantities ofinterest in gammainterest in gamma--spectrometryspectrometry

XX

XX

Nuclide assay Nuclide assay

(activity (activity

measurement)measurement)

XXTotal count rateTotal count rate

XXFullFull--energyenergy--peak, singlepeak, single--

or doubleor double--escapeescape--peakpeak

count ratecount rate

XXPeak width (i.e. FWHM)Peak width (i.e. FWHM)

XXFullFull--energyenergy--peak location peak location

(peak(peak centroidcentroid))

SpecialSpecial

applicationsapplications

NuclideNuclide

identificationidentification

(photon energy (photon energy

measurement)measurement)

Page 11: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.10/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

FullFull--energyenergy--peak locationpeak locationand widthand width

Visual location of peaks is still a good methodVisual location of peaks is still a good method

Automatic routines (large number of peaks, many spectra)Automatic routines (large number of peaks, many spectra)

oo Adjust optimum sensitivityAdjust optimum sensitivity

oo PeakPeak deconvolutiondeconvolution

oo Accurate (Accurate (±±0.10.1 chch) peak ) peak centroidcentroid determination (not integer values)determination (not integer values)

oo Peak width (i.e. FWHM) Peak width (i.e. FWHM)

Page 12: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.11/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Peak areaPeak area

Methods for determination:Methods for determination:

oo Sum of counts in ROI and background subtractionSum of counts in ROI and background subtraction

oo Nonlinear leastNonlinear least--squares methods (many peak shape functions)squares methods (many peak shape functions)

Peak area: not wellPeak area: not well--defined quantitydefined quantity

Peak area: defined by the method used to compute itPeak area: defined by the method used to compute it

Page 13: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.12/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Total count rateTotal count rate

Methods for determination:Methods for determination:

oo Sum of counts in the whole pulseSum of counts in the whole pulse--height spectrum, with linear height spectrum, with linear

extrapolation to zero count rateextrapolation to zero count rate

oo Integral counting above an energy thresholdIntegral counting above an energy threshold

Total count rate: wellTotal count rate: well--defined quantity (for a given threshold)defined quantity (for a given threshold)

Corrections for background and dead time required Corrections for background and dead time required

Page 14: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.13/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Linearity conditionsLinearity conditions

Photon energy, E, and peak Photon energy, E, and peak centroidcentroid, c, are linearly related:, c, are linearly related:

Source activity, A, proportional to the peak count rate, R:Source activity, A, proportional to the peak count rate, R:

where T=counting timewhere T=counting time

Peak centroid =c

Peak area =N

caaE 21 +=

T

NRA =∝

Page 15: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.14/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE MEASUREMENTMEASUREMENT

Page 16: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.15/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

CALIBRATION : definitionsCALIBRATION : definitions[Ref. BIPM/ISO International Vocabulary of[Ref. BIPM/ISO International Vocabulary of

basic and general terms in metrology]basic and general terms in metrology]

CALIBRATION:CALIBRATION: set of operations that set of operations that

establish,establish, under specified conditionsunder specified conditions, the , the

relationshiprelationship betweenbetween valuesvalues of quantities of quantities

indicated by a measuring instrument or indicated by a measuring instrument or

measuring system, or values represented by a measuring system, or values represented by a

material measure or a reference material, and the material measure or a reference material, and the

correspondingcorresponding valuesvalues realised by standards.realised by standards.

caaEs 21 +=T

NRAs =∝

Page 17: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.16/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Relative and absoluteRelative and absolutemeasurement methodsmeasurement methods

RELATIVE MEASUREMENT:RELATIVE MEASUREMENT: measurement performed

by a comparison between the value of a quantity to be

measured and a known value (given by a standard) of the

same physical quantity

ABSOLUTE MEASUREMENT:ABSOLUTE MEASUREMENT: measurement performed

with reference to the definition of the physical quantity to

be measured and with no reference to other values of the

same physical quantity

Page 18: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.17/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example of a relative measurementExample of a relative measurement

R: Instrument reading

where: A: Physical quantity

: Proportionality constant

Under reproducible conditions ( =const.):

where:

x: Problem values

S: Standard values

AR ε=

S

S

xx

SS

xx

AR

RA

AR

AR

=

=

=

ε

ε

x

x

S

S

A

R

A

R==ε

RELATIVE MEASUREMENT:RELATIVE MEASUREMENT: measurement performed by a comparisonbetween the value of a quantity to be measured and a known value (given by a standard) of the same physical quantity

Page 19: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.18/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example of a relative measurementExample of a relative measurementof radionuclide activity (gamma emitter)of radionuclide activity (gamma emitter)

A: Source Activity (Iγ =1)

where: R: Net count rate

ε: Counting efficiency

Under reproducible conditions (ε=const.):

where:

x: Problem source

S: Standard source

The constant ε can be experimentally determined with a standard source (during system calibration)

and used at a later date to measure the activity of other sources in the same experimental conditions.

To this purpose the instrument stability must be carefully checked by measuring a reference source (not

necessarily calibrated) of some long lived radionuclide (such as Ra-226 or Eu-252) whenever a measurement

is made.

εAR =

S

S

xx

SS

xx

AR

RA

AR

AR

=

=

=

ε

ε

222 )()(2)(...

)()()(...

Sx

Sx

AuRuAuthen

RuRuRuif

+=

==

Page 20: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.19/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example of a relative measurementExample of a relative measurementmethod (radionuclide activity)method (radionuclide activity)

Activity measurement of a radioactive source by means of a substActivity measurement of a radioactive source by means of a substitution method itution method (source to be measured and standard source) (source to be measured and standard source) under reproducible conditionsunder reproducible conditions,,using any instrument that records either individual radiations ousing any instrument that records either individual radiations or else measures r else measures their ionising effects.their ionising effects.

Within the meaning of Within the meaning of reproducible conditionsreproducible conditions are to be included the are to be included the geometry of the equipment and the disposition and quantity of angeometry of the equipment and the disposition and quantity of any material y material absorbing or scattering the radiations.absorbing or scattering the radiations.

In these respects the characteristics of the source itself are nIn these respects the characteristics of the source itself are no less important o less important than those of the measuring instrument.than those of the measuring instrument.

The recording device used in the substitution method can be an eThe recording device used in the substitution method can be an electroscope, a lectroscope, a beta particle or a gammabeta particle or a gamma--ray ionisation chamber, any type of alpharay ionisation chamber, any type of alpha-- betabeta--gamma or xgamma or x--ray detector.ray detector.

The measurement method is not directly based on the definition oThe measurement method is not directly based on the definition of the physical f the physical quantityquantity

Page 21: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.20/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Definitions of some general terms used in metrologyDefinitions of some general terms used in metrology[BIPM/ISO International Vocabulary[BIPM/ISO International Vocabulary

of basic and general terms in metrology]of basic and general terms in metrology]

METROLOGYMETROLOGY: science of measurement: science of measurement

VALUEVALUE (of a quantity): magnitude of a particular quantity generally e(of a quantity): magnitude of a particular quantity generally expressed as a unit of measurement multiplied xpressed as a unit of measurement multiplied

by a numberby a number

TRUE VALUETRUE VALUE (of a quantity): value consistent with the definition of a give(of a quantity): value consistent with the definition of a given particular quantityn particular quantity

MEASUREMENTMEASUREMENT: set of operations having the object of determining a value of : set of operations having the object of determining a value of a quantitya quantity

METHOD OF MEASUREMENTMETHOD OF MEASUREMENT: logical sequence of operations, described generically, used in: logical sequence of operations, described generically, used in the execution of the execution of

measurementsmeasurements

ACCURACY OF MEASUREMENTACCURACY OF MEASUREMENT: closeness of the agreement between the result of a measurement: closeness of the agreement between the result of a measurement and a true and a true

value of the value of the measurandmeasurand

REPEATABILITYREPEATABILITY (of results of measurements): closeness of the agreement betwee(of results of measurements): closeness of the agreement between results of successive n results of successive

measurements of the same measurements of the same measurandmeasurand carried out under the same conditions of measurementcarried out under the same conditions of measurement

REPRODUCIBILITYREPRODUCIBILITY (of results of measurements): closeness of the agreement betwee(of results of measurements): closeness of the agreement between results of measurements of n results of measurements of

the same the same measurandmeasurand carried out under changed conditions of measurementcarried out under changed conditions of measurement

Page 22: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.21/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

INSTRUMENT CALIBRATIONINSTRUMENT CALIBRATION

Page 23: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.22/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

ENERGY CALIBRATIONENERGY CALIBRATION

Relationship under investigation:Relationship under investigation:

caaE 21 +=

Page 24: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.23/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Photon energy standardsPhoton energy standards

Need of precise (Need of precise (±±0.10.1 keVkeV)) energyenergy--calibration standardscalibration standards

Current system of energyCurrent system of energy--calibration standards (from a few calibration standards (from a few keVkeV to several to several MeVMeV) available since 70', based on accurate measurements of gamma) available since 70', based on accurate measurements of gamma--ray ray wavelengths (cm)wavelengths (cm)

Preference for traditional energy scale (Preference for traditional energy scale (keVkeV))

Continuous updateContinuous update

For routine gammaFor routine gamma--spectrometry some suitable references are:spectrometry some suitable references are:

oo Browne and Firestone 1986Browne and Firestone 1986

oo NCRP 1985NCRP 1985

oo IAEAIAEA--TECDOCTECDOC--619 Evaluated Data619 Evaluated Data

oo LNHBLNHB NucleideNucleide Gamma and Alpha LibraryGamma and Alpha Library

oo BIPM Monograph 5, Table of BIPM Monograph 5, Table of RadionuclidesRadionuclides, 2004 (DDEP work), 2004 (DDEP work)

Page 25: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.24/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Energy measurement usually used just for nuclide identificationEnergy measurement usually used just for nuclide identification

FWHM measurements needed for system check and for nuclide identiFWHM measurements needed for system check and for nuclide identificationfication

(presence of (presence of multipletsmultiplets))

Energy values not involved in quantitative calculationsEnergy values not involved in quantitative calculations

Uncertainty evaluation not always requiredUncertainty evaluation not always required

Importance of effect of change in energy calibration with time, Importance of effect of change in energy calibration with time, count rate and count rate and

temperature (Quality Control)temperature (Quality Control)

Dependence on peak type (fullDependence on peak type (full--energy or energy or s.e.ps.e.p.,., d.e.pd.e.p.) and algorithm used for .) and algorithm used for

determinationdetermination

Energy and FWHM calibrationEnergy and FWHM calibration

Page 26: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.25/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Accuracy of 0.01Accuracy of 0.01--0.030.03 keVkeV (from 100 to 1000 (from 100 to 1000 keVkeV) sufficient for typical applications) sufficient for typical applications

Functions:Functions:

oo linear usually adequatlinear usually adequatee

oo quadratic quadratic more accurate for old systemsmore accurate for old systems

At least two (or three) well chosen points are neededAt least two (or three) well chosen points are needed

Deviations (Deviations (±±tenths of channel) tenths of channel) arise mainly from amplifierarise mainly from amplifier--ADC non linearityADC non linearity

Advisable to avoid the first and last 10% of the energy scaleAdvisable to avoid the first and last 10% of the energy scale

More uniform distribution of uncertainties if more than 3 peaks More uniform distribution of uncertainties if more than 3 peaks are used and parameters are used and parameters

aaii determined by leastdetermined by least--squares fitssquares fits

Caution:Caution: multipletsmultiplets, 511 , 511 keVkeV annihilation peakannihilation peak

Energy and FWHM calibrationEnergy and FWHM calibration

2

321 cacaaE ++=

caaE 21 +=

Page 27: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.26/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Electronics nonlinearityElectronics nonlinearity

Pulse pilePulse pile--upup

Detector effects:Detector effects:

oo FieldField--increment effect, depending on angle of incidenceincrement effect, depending on angle of incidence

oo Incomplete chargeIncomplete charge--collection, depending on detector volumecollection, depending on detector volume

oo These effects determine a small (These effects determine a small (±±0.20.2 keVkeV)) dependence of energy calibration (in principle dependence of energy calibration (in principle

not affected by source geometry) on measurement geometrynot affected by source geometry) on measurement geometry

oo More evident for sources in front and beside a detectorMore evident for sources in front and beside a detector

Parameters affecting energy calibrationParameters affecting energy calibration

Page 28: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.27/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

EFFICIENCY CALIBRATIONEFFICIENCY CALIBRATION

Relationship under investigation:Relationship under investigation:

kAR =

Page 29: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.28/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Assume a radioactive source and a detector connected to a pulse Assume a radioactive source and a detector connected to a pulse counting counting

systemsystem

The net count rate, R, is proportional to the source Activity, AThe net count rate, R, is proportional to the source Activity, A::

where I: emission probability for the considered radiationwhere I: emission probability for the considered radiation

The proportionality factor is due to physical effects that can bThe proportionality factor is due to physical effects that can be subdivided into e subdivided into

3 categories:3 categories:

1.1. Geometric effects, Geometric effects, ffgg: solid angle of the detector as viewed by the source: solid angle of the detector as viewed by the source

2.2. Source effects, Source effects, ffss : source material and source construction.: source material and source construction.

3.3. Detector effects, Detector effects, ffdd : detector window, intrinsic detector efficiency.: detector window, intrinsic detector efficiency.

A simple counting A simple counting systemsystem

detector

source

electronics

AIfffdsg

R =

Page 30: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.29/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

The efficiency, The efficiency, ,, is generally defined by:is generally defined by:

with:with:

oo Instrument response, RInstrument response, R

oo Value of physical quantity, XValue of physical quantity, X

According to the chosen instrument resp. and phys ical quantity:According to the chosen instrument resp. and phys ical quantity:

oo FullFull--energyenergy--peak count rate, peak count rate, RRpp

oo Total count rate, Total count rate, RRtt

oo Photon emission rate, IAPhoton emission rate, IA

oo Activity, AActivity, A

the following definition of efficiency apply:the following definition of efficiency apply:

oo fullfull--energyenergy--peak (peak (fepfep) efficiency, ) efficiency, pp

oo total efficiency, total efficiency, tt

oo nuclidenuclide--related peak efficiency, related peak efficiency, nn

oo nuclidenuclide--related total efficiency (counting efficiency), related total efficiency (counting efficiency), ttnn

wherewhere I, is the photon emission probability.I, is the photon emission probability.

Definition of efficiencyDefinition of efficiency

X

R=ε

IA

Rp

p =ε

IA

Rtt =ε

A

Rp

n =ε

A

Rt

nt =ε

Page 31: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.30/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

FullFull--energyenergy--peak efficiency, peak efficiency, pp

oo application to many problems in routine measurementsapplication to many problems in routine measurements

oo quite easily interpolated as func tion of photon energyquite easily interpolated as func tion of photon energy

oo need to be correc ted for coincidence summingneed to be correc ted for coincidence summing

Total efficiency, Total efficiency, tt

oo not used in spectrometry (energy information is lost)not used in spectrometry (energy information is lost)

oo useful in coincidence summing correctionsuseful in coincidence summing corrections

NuclideNuclide--related peak efficiency, related peak efficiency, nn

oo useful for measurements of a same nuclideuseful for measurements of a same nuclide

oo no correction for coincidence summingno correction for coincidence summing

Application of the different Application of the different efficienciesefficiencies

Page 32: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.31/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Considerations on the efficiencyConsiderations on the efficiency

The efficiency is related to specific sourceThe efficiency is related to specific source--detector geometry and peak detector geometry and peak

analysis procedureanalysis procedure

Detector geometry not reproduc ible, then efficiency calibration Detector geometry not reproduc ible, then efficiency calibration is required is required

for each individual detector (contrary to for each individual detector (contrary to NaINaI detectors)detectors)

The efficiency is given by: The efficiency is given by:

but the three fac torsbut the three fac tors

oo ffgg == = effective subtended solid angle= effective subtended solid angle

oo ffss == ss = self= self--absorption factorabsorption factor

oo ffdd == ii = intrinsic efficiency= intrinsic efficiency

are not total ly independent each other and are not total ly independent each other and == (E).(E).

Nevertheless this factorisation is very useful for calculation oNevertheless this factorisation is very useful for calculation of correction f correction

factors (see later)factors (see later)

dsg fff=ε

Page 33: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.32/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

The efficiency can be determined by:The efficiency can be determined by:

oo CalculationCalculation

oo Measurement (by a calibrated source)Measurement (by a calibrated source)

In both cases, is usually needed.In both cases, is usually needed.

Instrument calibrationInstrument calibration

IAAIfffdsg

R ε==

dsg fff=ε

s

s

IA

R=ε

)(Eεε =

Page 34: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.33/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

EFFICIENCY CALCULATION:EFFICIENCY CALCULATION:

difficult and inaccuratedifficult and inaccurate

Page 35: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.34/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Efficiency calculationEfficiency calculation

The efficiency (The efficiency (fepfep or total) can be calculated by:or total) can be calculated by:

oo Analytical expressionsAnalytical expressions

oo Monte Carlo codesMonte Carlo codes

Achievable uncertainties: 5Achievable uncertainties: 5--10 %10 %

Results are usually inaccurate due to:Results are usually inaccurate due to:

oo lack of physical meaning for the instrument response (peak shapelack of physical meaning for the instrument response (peak shape and fulland full--

energyenergy--peak area definition) peak area definition)

oo detector geometry not sufficiently known (crystal shape and sizedetector geometry not sufficiently known (crystal shape and size, dead layers, , dead layers,

etc..)etc..)

oo statistics (MC calculations)statistics (MC calculations)

oo cross section and other physical parameters (cross section and other physical parameters (±±2%)2%)

Nevertheless, calculations are more and more us ed to get relativNevertheless, calculations are more and more us ed to get relative efficiencies, e efficiencies,

especially by MC methods (see later)especially by MC methods (see later)

fffdsg

Page 36: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.35/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Geometry effect (1/4):Geometry effect (1/4):the geometry factor for point sourcesthe geometry factor for point sources

detector

source Ω R

d

ffgg = number of particles entering the detector / number of particl= number of particles entering the detector / number of particles es

emitted by the sourceemitted by the source

)(4

)1(24

2

2

22Rd

dR

Rd

df

g>>≅

+−=

Ω= π

π

Page 37: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.36/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Geometry effect (2/4):Geometry effect (2/4):the geometry factor for plane sourcesthe geometry factor for plane sources

detector

source

As

r

dAs

n

dAr

Arθ

ffgg = number of particles entering the detector / number of particl= number of particles entering the detector / number of particles es

emitted by the sourceemitted by the source

∫∫→→

⋅=

sr AA

sr

sg

dAdAr

rn

Arf 24

1

π

∫∫∫∫∫∫⋅

===

=

⋅=

−−−−

−−−

rSrSrS AA

Sr

SAA

rS

SAA

g

rS

S

rsrs

dAdAr

rn

Arr

dAdA

A

S

SSd

Sf

r

dAdA

A

SSd

r

rn

ratesemissionelementalandtotaldSS

areaselementalandtotaldAdAAA

rr

rr

22

2

2

2

4

1

4

cos11

4

cos

cos

:...

:.........

ππθ

πθ

θ

Page 38: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.37/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Geometry effect (3/4):Geometry effect (3/4):the geometry factor for volume sourcesthe geometry factor for volume sources

detector

source

V

r

dV

n

dA

dΩA

ω

ffgg = number of particles entering the detector / number of particl= number of particles entering the detector / number of particles es

emitted by the sourceemitted by the source

∫∫∫∫→→

→→

⋅==

⋅==Ω

Ω=

−−−−

−−−

−−−

VAVAg

dAdVr

rn

Vr

S

SSd

S

r

rn

r

dA

r

dAd

ddV

V

SSd

ratesemissionelementalandtotaldSS

volumeselementalandtotaldVV

areaselementalandtotaldAA

f 2

2

22

2

4

11

cos

4

:...

:...

:...

π

ω

π

∫∫→→

⋅=

VAg

dAdVr

rn

Vrf 24

1

π

Page 39: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.38/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Geometry effect (4/4):Geometry effect (4/4):determination of the geometry factordetermination of the geometry factor

The geometry factor can be obtained by analytical formulas in The geometry factor can be obtained by analytical formulas in

very few cases.very few cases.

Suitable approximations can be obtained by:Suitable approximations can be obtained by:

oo Series expansionsSeries expansions

oo Numerical integrationNumerical integration

oo Monte Carlo calculationsMonte Carlo calculations

Page 40: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.39/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Source effects (1/3)Source effects (1/3)

Main source effects are:Main source effects are:

oo SelfSelf--absorption:absorption: ffaa

oo Scattering:Scattering: ffbb

fffbas

=

Page 41: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.40/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Source effect (2/3): selfSource effect (2/3): self--absorptionabsorption

sourcet

x

dx

ffaa = self= self--absorption factorabsorption factor = number of particles emitted = number of particles emitted

from the source / number of particles produced in the from the source / number of particles produced in the

sourcesource

Very important for charged particlesVery important for charged particles

[ ]10

11

≤≤

−= −

a

t

a

f

et

f µ

µ

dxet

S

S

t

xt

af ∫ −−=

0

)(1 µ

ForFor γγ andand ββ radiations:radiations:

Page 42: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.41/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Source effect (3/3): ScatteringSource effect (3/3): Scattering

ffbb = backscattering factor= backscattering factor = number of partic les emitted toward the detec tor = number of partic les emitted toward the detec tor

withwith the support / number of parti cles emitted toward the detec tor the support / number of parti cles emitted toward the detec tor withoutwithout

the supportthe support

Very important for charged particlesVery important for charged particles

detector

source

1

2

source support

Page 43: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.42/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Detector effects (1/2)Detector effects (1/2)

Main detector effects are:Main detector effects are:

oo No interaction with the detector (2)No interaction with the detector (2)

oo Absorption (3) or scattering (4) in the Absorption (3) or scattering (4) in the

detector windowdetector window

detectorsource

3

24

1

detector windowdetector

Page 44: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.43/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Detector effects (2/2):Detector effects (2/2):intrinsic detector efficiencyintrinsic detector efficiency

ffεε = intrinsic efficiency= intrinsic efficiency = number of pulses produced = number of pulses produced

in the detector and counted / number of particles in the detector and counted / number of particles

impinging on the detectorimpinging on the detector

The detector efficiency depends upon:The detector efficiency depends upon:

oo Density and size of detector materi alDensity and size of detector materi al

oo Type and energy of radiati onType and energy of radiati on

oo ElectronicsElectronics

Page 45: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.44/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT:EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT:easier and more accurate that calculationeasier and more accurate that calculation

Page 46: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.45/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Uncertainty of the efficiency calibrationUncertainty of the efficiency calibration

NeedsNeedsProcedureProcedureUncUnc..

(%)(%)

Application of accurate correctionsApplication of accurate corrections

More sophisticated procedures with 9More sophisticated procedures with 9--

10 single10 single--gamma emitters and several gamma emitters and several

correctionscorrections

Quick calibration with 1 or 2 multiQuick calibration with 1 or 2 multi--

gamma emitters and standard gamma emitters and standard

interpolation proceduresinterpolation procedures

Intermediate experience and Intermediate experience and

good software packagesgood software packages

11--55

Considerable experience, Considerable experience,

research work in progressresearch work in progress

0.50.5--11

Low experience and standard Low experience and standard

software packagessoftware packages

>5>5

Page 47: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.46/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

MultigammaMultigamma/Single/Single--gamma emittersgamma emittersfor efficiency calibrationfor efficiency calibration

AdvantagesAdvantages//DisadvantagesDisadvantages

Compton backgroundCompton background

DeconvolutionDeconvolution

TT1/21/2

Coincidence summingCoincidence summing

Single gammaSingle gammaMultigammaMultigamma

Covering of broad energy rangeCovering of broad energy range

Page 48: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.47/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Frequently used calibration nuclides for Frequently used calibration nuclides for 6060--30003000 keVkeV energy rangeenergy range

Multigamma Energy

(keV)

Ba-133 53-384

Eu-152 122-1408

Ra-226* 186-2448

Ag-110m 447-1562

Co-56 847-3451

Single

gamma

Energy

(keV)

Am241 59

Cd-109 88

Co-57 122

Ce-139 166

Hg-203 279

Cr-51 320

Sn-113 392

Be-7 478

Sr-85 514

Cs-137 662

Mn-54 835

Zn-65 1116

Na-22 1275

* Daughters at secular * Daughters at secular equilibrium ! equilibrium !

Multigamma Energy

(keV)

Y-88 898, 1836

Co-60 1173, 1332

Page 49: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.48/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Principal fitting functions in thePrincipal fitting functions in the6060--30003000 keVkeV energy rangeenergy range

SemiempiricalSemiempirical

oo (E(E), photoelectric cross section), photoelectric cross section

oo (E(E), Compton cross section), Compton cross section

Linear relationshipLinear relationship

oo EE00=1=1 keVkeV

oo Two joined functions: 60<E<200 Two joined functions: 60<E<200 keVkeV, E>200 , E>200 keVkeV

Polynomial functionsPolynomial functions

oo EE00=1=1 keVkeV

oo Two joined functions: 60<E<200 Two joined functions: 60<E<200 keVkeV, E>200 , E>200 keVkeV

oo n<3n<3

[ ]EaeaEEaE 3

21 )()()(−+= στε

)/log()(log )010 EEaaE −=ε

[ ]∑=

=n

j

j

j EEaE0

)0 )/log()(logε

scatteredscattered photonphoton escapeescape

Page 50: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.49/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Extension of the efficiency calibration range:Extension of the efficiency calibration range:The efficiency ratio methodThe efficiency ratio method

The efficiency at energy The efficiency at energy EEii is obtained from the efficiency measured at is obtained from the efficiency measured at

energy Eenergy E00 and the efficiency ratio and the efficiency ratio kkii, directly measured with an , directly measured with an uncalibrateduncalibrated

source (same geometry !)source (same geometry !)

Example:Example:

oo EE00=122.1=122.1 keVkeV (Co(Co--57)57)

oo EE11=121.8=121.8 keVkeV (Eu(Eu--152)152)

oo EEii=other Eu=other Eu--152 photon energies152 photon energies

)(

)(

)()(

0

0

E

Ek

kEE

ii

ii

εε

εε

=

=

)(

)()(

)(

)()()(

1

0

0

0E

EE

E

EEE ii

i εε

εεε

εε ≈=)()( 10 EE εε ≈

Page 51: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.50/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Total efficiency calibrationTotal efficiency calibration

Important in coincidenceImportant in coincidence--summing correctionssumming corrections

Single gamma emitters requiredSingle gamma emitters required

Radionuclide used: AmRadionuclide used: Am--241, Cd241, Cd--109, Ce109, Ce--139, Cr139, Cr--51, Sr51, Sr--85, Cs85, Cs--137, Mn137, Mn--5454

Total count rate obtained by extrapolation to zero energyTotal count rate obtained by extrapolation to zero energy

XX--ray peaks subtracted (only fullray peaks subtracted (only full--energyenergy--peaks !)peaks !)

For E<60 For E<60 keVkeV,, tt==

Page 52: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.51/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Typical efficiency curves of Typical efficiency curves of HPGeHPGedetectorsdetectors

Page 53: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.52/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Geometry of standard sources for Geometry of standard sources for efficiency calibrationefficiency calibration

Point source

Liquid solutions

Paper filters

Marinelli beakers

Page 54: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.53/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

EFFICIENCY TRANSFEREFFICIENCY TRANSFER

Page 55: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.54/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

2222 )()()()( Ssxx AuRuRuAu ++=

Relative measurement under reproducible conditionsRelative measurement under reproducible conditions((ε ε =cost.)=cost.)

AR ε=s

s

xx

xx

ss

AR

RA

AR

AR

=

=

=

ε

ε

x

x

s

s

A

R

A

R==ε

RELATIVE MEASUREMENT:RELATIVE MEASUREMENT: measurement performed by a comparisonbetween the value (Ax) of a quantity to be measured and a known value (AS)(given by a standard) of the same physical quantity

[Ref. BIPM/ISO International Vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology]HP: Decadimento ed altri effetti dipendenti dal rateo di conteggio trascurabili !

εεεεCountingCounting efficiencyefficiency

(cost.)(cost.)

AAxxAAssActivityActivity

RRxxRRssInstrumentInstrument readingreading

ProblemProblem

sourcesource

Standard Standard

sourcesource

LEGENDLEGEND

Page 56: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.55/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Relative measurement under NON reproducible conditionsRelative measurement under NON reproducible conditions((εε≠≠cost.)cost.)

efficiencyefficiency transfertransfer methodsmethods

AR ε=

⎪⎪⎭

⎪⎪⎬

⎪⎪⎩

⎪⎪⎨

=

=⇒≡

⎪⎪⎪

⎪⎪⎪

⎪⎪⎪

⎪⎪⎪

=

=

=

k

kAR

RA

k

AR

RA

AR

AR

sx

s

s

xx

x

s

s

x

s

s

xx

xxx

sss

1εε

εε

εε

ε

ε

The constant k can be determined by::

Measurements

Analytic expressions

Monte Carlo simulations

Semi empirical models

22222 )()()()()( kuAuRuRuAu Ssxx +++=

Ifffdsg

ffgg:: geometric efficiency geometric efficiency

(subtended solid angle)(subtended solid angle)

ffss:: source efficiencysource efficiency

ffdd:: detection efficiencydetection efficiency

I:I: emissonemisson probabilityprobability

Efficiency Efficiency

factorisationfactorisation

εεεεCountingCounting efficiencyefficiency

(cost.)(cost.)

AAxxAAssActivityActivity

RRxxRRssInstrumentInstrument readingreading

ProblemProblem

sourcesource

Standard Standard

sourcesource

LEGENDLEGEND

Page 57: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.56/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

UNCERTANTY evaluation by UNCERTANTY evaluation by efficiency transfer" efficiency transfer"

⎪⎪⎭

⎪⎪⎬

⎪⎪⎩

⎪⎪⎨

=

=⇒≡

⎪⎪⎪

⎪⎪⎪

⎪⎪⎪

⎪⎪⎪

=

=

=

k

kAR

RA

k

AR

RA

AR

AR

sx

s

s

xx

x

s

s

x

s

s

xx

xxx

sss

1εε

εε

εε

ε

ε

22222 )(')(')(')(')(' kuAuRuRuAu Ssxx +++=

s

s

xxx

s

s

s

xx

kAR

RA

ku

ktHP

AR

RA

ku

ktHP

=⇒⎪⎭

⎪⎬

⎪⎩

⎪⎨

≠≡⇒≠

=⇒⎭⎬⎫

⎩⎨⎧

=⇒=

0)(

1cos:

0)(

1cos:

εε

ε

ε

εεεεCountingCounting efficiencyefficiency

(cost.)(cost.)

AAxxAAssActivityActivity

RRxxRRssInstrumentInstrument readingreading

ProblemProblem

sourcesource

Standard Standard

sourcesource

LEGENDLEGEND

Page 58: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.57/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

FromFrom calibrationcalibration toto measurementmeasurement

Sample treatmentSample treatment

GrindingGrinding

HomogenizationHomogenization

WeighingWeighing

Preparation of measurement Preparation of measurement

geometrygeometry

s

ss

A

R=ε

ProvinoRivelatore

R

d

R

Efficiency transferEfficiency transfer

Detector characterizationDetector characterization

Geometry characterizationGeometry characterization

Calculation or measurement Calculation or measurement

of efficiency transfer factor, kof efficiency transfer factor, k

Measurement geometry Calibration geometrySample and measurement instrument

x

skεε

ksx

1εε =

Page 59: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.58/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example: different nuclides, detection Example: different nuclides, detection efficiencyefficiency

'εε I=

⎭⎬⎫

⎩⎨⎧

=⇒==≡

⎪⎪⎪

⎪⎪⎪

=

==

==

s

s

xx

x

s

x

s

x

s

s

x

s

s

xx

ssssS

xxxxx

kAR

RA

I

I

I

Ik

AI

I

R

RA

AIAR

AIAR

'

''

'

εε

εε

εε

εε

Under non reproducible conditio ns (different nuclide, same photo n energy)

AIAR 'εε ==

εεεεDetection efficiencyDetection efficiency

εεxxεεssCounting efficiencyCounting efficiency

IIxxIIssPhoton emission probabilityPhoton emission probability

AAxxAAssActivityActivity

RRxxRRssInstrument readingInstrument reading

Problem sourceProblem sourceStandard sourceStandard source

Page 60: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.59/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example: extension of calibration interval Example: extension of calibration interval (gamma(gamma spectrspectr.), efficiency ratio method.), efficiency ratio method

EfficicnyEfficicny at energy at energy EEii is derived from the efficiency measured at energy Eis derived from the efficiency measured at energy E00

and from the ratio and from the ratio kkii, directly measured by a non calibrated source (same , directly measured by a non calibrated source (same

geometry !)geometry !)

Example:Example:

oo EE00=122,1=122,1 keVkeV (standard source Co(standard source Co--57)57)

oo EE11=121,8=121,8 keVkeV (non standard source Eu(non standard source Eu--152)152)

oo EEii=other Eu=other Eu--152 photon emissions152 photon emissions

)(

)( 1

i

iE

Ek

εε

=

i

ik

EE1

)()( 0εε =)()( 10 EE εε ≈

Not necessarily Not necessarily

calibratedcalibrated

sourcesource

Traceability

Page 61: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.60/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

ExampleExample:: correctioncorrection forfor geometrygeometry andand fillingfillingvolumevolume

camp

c

ccamp

R

AF =

rif

c

camp

crif

R

RC =

std

IRE

ENEAstd

A

AF =

vol

c

rif

cvol

R

RC =

std

IRE

ENEAstd

A

AF =

std

IRE

ENEAstd

A

AF =

volrifcampvol CCFF =

Efficiencytransfer 1

(sample holder)

Efficiencytransfer 2(samplevolume)

Calraion geometry Reference geometry (rif) Measurement geometry

rifcamprif CFF = volrifvol CFF =

Traceability

camp rif vol

Page 62: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.61/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

ETNA (ETNA (EfficiencyEfficiency Transfer for Nuclide Transfer for Nuclide ActivityActivity measurementsmeasurements)) isis aasoftwaresoftware developeddeveloped by the Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel by the Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel thatthatallowsallows calculationcalculation of:of:

-- efficiencyefficiency transfertransfer factorsfactors

-- coincidencecoincidence summingsumming correctionscorrections

RRééfféérencesrences

M.C.M.C. LLéépypy, M.M. , M.M. BBéé, F. Piton, "ETNA (Efficiency Transfer for Nuclide Activity meas, F. Piton, "ETNA (Efficiency Transfer for Nuclide Activity measurements) : urements) : LogicielLogiciel pour le pour le calculcalcul dudu transferttransfert dede rendementrendement et des corrections de et des corrections de cocoïïncidencesncidences enenspectromspectroméétrietrie gamma", Note technique LNHB/01/09/F (2001)gamma", Note technique LNHB/01/09/F (2001)

M.C.M.C. LLéépypy et al., Intercomparison of efficiency transfer software for gamet al., Intercomparison of efficiency transfer software for gammama--ray spectrometry, ray spectrometry, Applied Radiation and Isotopes Vol.55 NApplied Radiation and Isotopes Vol.55 N°°4 (October 2001) 4934 (October 2001) 493--503.503.

EfficiencyEfficiency transfer in transfer in γγ--rayray spec.:spec.:ETNAETNA

Page 63: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.62/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Detector geometryDetector geometry

Detector geometry is required for:Detector geometry is required for:

"efficiency transfer" applications (geometry and self "efficiency transfer" applications (geometry and self absorbtionabsorbtion

corrections);corrections);

total efficiency calculation (coincidencetotal efficiency calculation (coincidence--summing corrections);summing corrections);

This information can be:This information can be:

obtained by the detector manufacturer;obtained by the detector manufacturer;

directly measured by xdirectly measured by x--ray radiography.ray radiography.

old detector (1970) new detector (1985)old detector (1970) new detector (1985)

Page 64: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.63/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

NUCLEAR DATANUCLEAR DATA

Page 65: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.64/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Decay Data Evaluation Project (DDEP)Decay Data Evaluation Project (DDEP)recommended data baserecommended data base

Started in 1990Started in 1990

Expert evaluatorsExpert evaluators

Evaluation procedure preliminary agreedEvaluation procedure preliminary agreed

Special attention to measurement uncertaintiesSpecial attention to measurement uncertainties

DDEP recommended (2004) by the Bureau International des DDEP recommended (2004) by the Bureau International des PoidsPoids etet MesuresMesures (BIPM)(BIPM)

DDEP on the WEBDDEP on the WEB

((http://http://www.nucleide.orgwww.nucleide.org/DDEP_WG/DDEPdata.htm/DDEP_WG/DDEPdata.htm))

DDEP published also as BIPM DDEP published also as BIPM MonographieMonographie N. 5N. 5

(http://www.bipm.fr/en/publications/monographie(http://www.bipm.fr/en/publications/monographie--riri--5.html)5.html)

Page 66: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.65/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

ICRM RECOMMENDATIONICRM RECOMMENDATIONICRMICRM GeneralGeneral Meeting, 9th Meeting, 9th SeptemberSeptember 20052005

Given that BIPM has recommended the use of Given that BIPM has recommended the use of DDEP evaluated decay data in all DDEP evaluated decay data in all NMINMI ss, the , the Nuclear Data Working Group recommends the Nuclear Data Working Group recommends the adoption of DDEP data in all members adoption of DDEP data in all members institutes of the ICRM, to assure roundness institutes of the ICRM, to assure roundness and consistency in their future nuclear data and consistency in their future nuclear data studies.studies.

International Committee for Radionuclide Metrology (ICRM)International Committee for Radionuclide Metrology (ICRM)

(http://(http://www.physics.nist.gov/icrmwww.physics.nist.gov/icrm))

Page 67: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.66/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

OtherOther NuclearNuclear data www data www sitessites

http://www-nds.iaea.or.at/nsr/index.jsp

http://www.nea.fr/html/dbdata/

http://www.nucleide.org

http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/index.jsp

http://www.radiochemistry.org/periodictable/frames/gamma_spectra_htm

http://atom.kaeri.re.kr/index.html

http://ie.lbl.gov/

http://xdb.lbl.gov/

http://www.bipm.fr/en/publications/monographie-ri-5.html

Page 68: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.67/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

WorksopWorksop onon UnderstandingUnderstanding andand EvaluatingEvaluating

RadioanalyticalRadioanalytical MeasurementMeasurement UncertaintyUncertainty

UNCERTAINTY IN GAMMA UNCERTAINTY IN GAMMA SPECTROMETRYSPECTROMETRY

1. Metrology, measurement fundamentals

2. Uncertainty evaluation theory

3. Uncertainty components in gamma spectrometry

4. Methods for uncertainty determination

5. Application, exercises, Examples, Discussion

6. Characteristic limits

7. Quality control

8. Discussion with participants

Page 69: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.68/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

UNCERTAINTY EVALUATION UNCERTAINTY EVALUATION FOUNDAMENTALSFOUNDAMENTALS

Page 70: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.69/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Main pointsMain points

A measurement result has little or no meaning and value unless iA measurement result has little or no meaning and value unless itt

has an uncertaintyhas an uncertainty

Calibration and Testing laboratories ... shall have and apply a Calibration and Testing laboratories ... shall have and apply a

procedure to estimate the uncertainty of measurement ...procedure to estimate the uncertainty of measurement ... [ISO [ISO

17025 Par. 5.4.6]17025 Par. 5.4.6]

Page 71: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.70/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

GUM (ISO 1995)GUM (ISO 1995)

Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM)Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM)

When reporting the result of a measurement of a physical When reporting the result of a measurement of a physical

quantity, some quantitative indication of the result has to be gquantity, some quantitative indication of the result has to be giveniven

to assess its reliability and to allow comparisons to be made. Tto assess its reliability and to allow comparisons to be made. Thehe

Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement

establishes general rules for evaluating and expressing establishes general rules for evaluating and expressing

uncertainty in measurement that can be followed at many levels uncertainty in measurement that can be followed at many levels

of accuracy and in many fields.of accuracy and in many fields.

Year of publication: 1995 Year of publication: 1995

Page 72: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.71/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Error and Uncertainty: DefinitionsError and Uncertainty: Definitions[BIPM/ISO Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurements[BIPM/ISO Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurements]]

ERRORERROR (of measurement): result of a measurement minus a true value of(of measurement): result of a measurement minus a true value of the measurandthe measurand

RANDOM ERRORRANDOM ERROR: result of a measurement minus the mean that would result from : result of a measurement minus the mean that would result from an infinite an infinite

number of measurement of the same measurand carried out under renumber of measurement of the same measurand carried out under repeatability conditionspeatability conditions

SYSTEMATIC ERRORSYSTEMATIC ERROR: mean that would result from an infinite number of measurements: mean that would result from an infinite number of measurements of the of the

same measurand carried out under repeatability conditions minus same measurand carried out under repeatability conditions minus a true value of the measuranda true value of the measurand

CORRECTIONCORRECTION: value added algebraically to the uncorrected result of a measu: value added algebraically to the uncorrected result of a measurement to compensate rement to compensate

for systematic errorfor systematic error

CORRECTION FACTORCORRECTION FACTOR: numerical factor by which the uncorrected result of a measurem: numerical factor by which the uncorrected result of a measurement is ent is

multiplied to compensate for systematic errormultiplied to compensate for systematic error

UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENTUNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT: parameter, associated with the result of a measurement, that : parameter, associated with the result of a measurement, that

characterises the dispersion of the values that could reasonablycharacterises the dispersion of the values that could reasonably be attributed to the measurandbe attributed to the measurand

Page 73: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.72/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

GraphicalGraphicalillustration of illustration of

values, error, and values, error, and uncertaintyuncertainty

[ISO (1993), Guide to the [ISO (1993), Guide to the

expression of uncertainty]expression of uncertainty]

Page 74: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.73/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Recommendation INCRecommendation INC--1 (1980) (1/2)1 (1980) (1/2)

1.1. The uncertainty in the result of a measurement generally consistThe uncertainty in the result of a measurement generally consists of several s of several components which may be grouped into categories according to thecomponents which may be grouped into categories according to the way in way in which their numerical value is estimated:which their numerical value is estimated:

A) Those which are evaluated by statistical methodsA) Those which are evaluated by statistical methods

B) Those which are evaluated by other means.B) Those which are evaluated by other means.

There is not always a simple correspondence between the classifiThere is not always a simple correspondence between the classification into cation into categories A or B and the previously used classification into categories A or B and the previously used classification into randomrandom andandsystematicsystematic uncertainties. The term uncertainties. The term systematic uncertaintysystematic uncertainty can be misleading can be misleading

and should be avoided.and should be avoided.

Any detailed report of the uncertainty should consist of a complAny detailed report of the uncertainty should consist of a complete list of the ete list of the components, specifying for each the method used to obtain its nucomponents, specifying for each the method used to obtain its numerical value.merical value.

2.2. The components in category A are characterized by the estimated The components in category A are characterized by the estimated variances svariances s22ii

(or the estimated (or the estimated standard deviationsstandard deviations ssii) and the number of degrees of freedom ) and the number of degrees of freedom ννii. Where appropriate, the . Where appropriate, the covariancescovariances should be given.should be given.

Page 75: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.74/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Recommendation INCRecommendation INC--1 (1980) (2/2)1 (1980) (2/2)

3.3. The components in category B should be characterized by quantitiThe components in category B should be characterized by quantities ues u22jj, which , which

may be considered as approximations to the corresponding variancmay be considered as approximations to the corresponding variances, the es, the

estimate of which is assumed. The quantities uestimate of which is assumed. The quantities u22jj may be treated like variances may be treated like variances

and the quantities and the quantities uujj like standard deviations. Where appropriate, the like standard deviations. Where appropriate, the covariancescovariances

should be treated in a similar way.should be treated in a similar way.

4.4. The combined uncertainty should be characterized by the numericaThe combined uncertainty should be characterized by the numerical value l value

obtained applying the usual method for the combination of varianobtained applying the usual method for the combination of variances. The ces. The

combined uncertainty and its components should be expressed in tcombined uncertainty and its components should be expressed in the form of he form of

standard deviationsstandard deviations ..

5.5. If, for particular applications, it is necessary to multiply theIf, for particular applications, it is necessary to multiply the combined uncertainty combined uncertainty

by a factor to obtain an overall uncertainty, the multiplying faby a factor to obtain an overall uncertainty, the multiplying factor used must ctor used must

always be stated.always be stated.

Page 76: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.75/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

GraphicalGraphicalillustration of illustration of evaluating the evaluating the

standardstandarduncertainty of an uncertainty of an

input quantity input quantity from repeated from repeated observationsobservations

[ISO (1993), Guide to the [ISO (1993), Guide to the

expression of uncertainty]expression of uncertainty]

Page 77: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.76/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

GraphicalGraphicalillustration of illustration of evaluating the evaluating the

standardstandarduncertainty of an uncertainty of an

input quantity input quantity from an a priori from an a priori

distributiondistribution

[ISO (1993), Guide to the [ISO (1993), Guide to the

expression of uncertainty]expression of uncertainty]

Page 78: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.77/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

FinalFinalrecommendationsrecommendations

[ISO (1993), Guide to the expression of uncertainty][ISO (1993), Guide to the expression of uncertainty]

Page 79: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.78/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

A useful A useful GuidelineGuideline

[http://[http://physics.nist.govphysics.nist.gov]]

Page 80: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.79/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

ADDITIONALADDITIONALADVICE (UK)ADVICE (UK)

[www.npl.co.uk][www.npl.co.uk]

UKAS Report M3003, UKAS Report M3003, The Expression of Uncertainty and The Expression of Uncertainty and

Confidence in MeasurementConfidence in Measurement , 1977., 1977.

NPL Report GPG 11, NPL Report GPG 11, AA BiginnerBiginner s Guide s Guide toto UncertaintyUncertainty ofof

MeasurementMeasurement , 2001., 2001.

NPL Report GPG 49, NPL Report GPG 49, TheThe AssessmentAssessment ofof UncertaintyUncertainty inin

RadiologicalRadiological CalibrationCalibration andand TestingTesting , 2003., 2003.

Page 81: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.80/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

STATISTICAL QUANTITIESSTATISTICAL QUANTITIES

Page 82: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.81/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Definition of probabilityDefinition of probability

Assume that one repeats an experiment many times and observes whAssume that one repeats an experiment many times and observes whether or not a certain event x ether or not a certain event x is the outcome.is the outcome.

If the experiment was performed N times, and n results were of tIf the experiment was performed N times, and n results were of type x, the probability ype x, the probability P(xP(x) that ) that any single event will be of type x is equal to:any single event will be of type x is equal to:

The ratio n/N is called the relative frequency of occurrence of The ratio n/N is called the relative frequency of occurrence of x in the first N trials.x in the first N trials.

Since both n and N are positive numbers:Since both n and N are positive numbers:

The probability is measured on a scale from 0 to 1The probability is measured on a scale from 0 to 1

If the event x occurs every time the experiment is performed, thIf the event x occurs every time the experiment is performed, then:en:

If the event x never occurs, then:If the event x never occurs, then:

N

nxP

N ∞→= lim)(

1)(0

10

≤≤

≤≤

xP

N

n

1)( =

=

xP

Nn

0)(

0

=

=

xP

n

Page 83: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.82/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Probability distribution (a)Probability distribution (a)

When an experiment is repeated many times under identical conditWhen an experiment is repeated many times under identical conditions, the results of the ions, the results of the

measurement will not necessarily be identical.measurement will not necessarily be identical.

A quantity x that can be determined quantitatively and that in sA quantity x that can be determined quantitatively and that in successive but similar experiments uccessive but similar experiments

can assume different values is called a random variable.can assume different values is called a random variable.

There are two types of random variables, discrete and continuousThere are two types of random variables, discrete and continuous..

A discrete random variable takes one of a set of discrete valuesA discrete random variable takes one of a set of discrete values..

A continuous random variable can take any value within a certainA continuous random variable can take any value within a certain interval.interval.

For every random variable x, one may define a function For every random variable x, one may define a function f(xf(x) as follows:) as follows:

Page 84: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.83/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Probability distribution (b)Probability distribution (b)

Discrete random variables:Discrete random variables:

f(xf(xii)=probability that the value of the random variables is x)=probability that the value of the random variables is xi, i, with i=1, 2,with i=1, 2, ,N and N=number of ,N and N=number of

possible values of x.possible values of x.

Since x takes only one value at a time, the events presented by Since x takes only one value at a time, the events presented by a probabilities a probabilities f(xf(xii) are mutually ) are mutually

exclusive:exclusive:

∑ =n

ixf1

1)(

Page 85: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.84/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Probability distribution (c)Probability distribution (c)

Continuous random variables:Continuous random variables:

Assume that a random variable may take any value between a and bAssume that a random variable may take any value between a and b::

thenthen f(x)dxf(x)dx=probability that the values of x lies between x and =probability that the values of x lies between x and x+dxx+dx so:so:

where where f(xf(x)=probability density function ()=probability density function (pdfpdf).).

The probability The probability p(xp(xaa,, xxbb) that a value of x falls into the interval between ) that a value of x falls into the interval between xxaa andand xxbb isis

∫ =b

a

dxxf 1)(

bxa ≤≤

∫=b

a

x

x

ba dxxfxxP )(),(

Page 86: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.85/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

The MeanThe Mean The mean, also known as the The mean, also known as the averageaverage or the or the expectation valueexpectation value of x, is defined by of x, is defined by

the equation:the equation:

continuouscontinuous discretediscrete

The mean of any function The mean of any function g(xg(x) is:) is:

continuouscontinuous discretediscrete

If a is a constant:If a is a constant:

xEdxxxfmx === ∫+∞

∞−

)( )(1

i

N

i

i xfxmx ∑=

==

∫∞+

∞−

+∞

∞−=

dxxf

dxxfxg

xg

)(

)()(

)(

=

==N

i

i

i

N

i

i

xf

xfxg

xg

1

1

)(

)()(

)(

)(...)()()(...)()(

)(

2121 xfxfxfxfxfxf

maxaxa

amxaax

nn +++=+++

+=+=+

==

Page 87: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.86/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

The VarianceThe Variance

For practical purposes it is sufficient to know the mean togetheFor practical purposes it is sufficient to know the mean together with a r with a

measure indicating how the probability density is distributed armeasure indicating how the probability density is distributed around the mean. ound the mean.

There are several such measures called There are several such measures called dispersion indexesdispersion indexes ..

The dispersion index most commonly used is the variance The dispersion index most commonly used is the variance V(xV(x) and its square ) and its square

root, called standard deviation s.root, called standard deviation s.

The variance of a probability density function is defined asThe variance of a probability density function is defined as

continuous:continuous: discrete:discrete:

where a and b are constants.where a and b are constants.

∫+∞

∞−

−== dxxfmxxV )()()( 22σ )()()(1

22 xfmxxVN

i

i∑=

−== σ

)()( 2 xVbbxaV =+

Page 88: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.87/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Covariance and correlation coefficientCovariance and correlation coefficient

Consider the random variables XConsider the random variables X11, X, X22,, ,, XXnn with means mwith means m11, m, m22,, , , mmnn and variances and variances σσ1122,,

σσ2222,, ,, σσnn

22..

The average and variance of the linear function Q=aThe average and variance of the linear function Q=a11xx11+ a+ a22xx22++ ++aannxxnn with with aaii constants areconstants are

TheThe covariancecovariance between Xbetween Xii andand XXjj is defined asis defined as

This equation for the covariance suffers from the serious drawbaThis equation for the covariance suffers from the serious drawback that its value change with the ck that its value change with the

units used for the measurement of Xunits used for the measurement of Xii andand XXjj. To eliminate this effect, the covariance is divided by . To eliminate this effect, the covariance is divided by

the product of the standard deviations the product of the standard deviations σσii andand σσjj and the resulting ratio is called and the resulting ratio is called covariance covariance

coefficientcoefficient ρρ(x(xii,x,xjj). Thus:). Thus:

Random variable for which Random variable for which ρρijij=0 are said to be uncorrelated.=0 are said to be uncorrelated.

∑=

=N

i

iimaQ1

∑ ∑∑= ==

−−+=⎥⎦

⎤⎢⎣

⎡−=−==

N

i

jjii

N

ji

jiii

N

i

iii mxmxaamxaQQQV1 1,

22

2

1

22 ))((2)()()( σσσ

))((),cov( jjiiji mxmxxx −−=

ji

ji

jiij

xxxx

σσρρ

),cov(),( ==

Page 89: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.88/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Sample estimates (a)Sample estimates (a)

If a sample of the n values xIf a sample of the n values x11, x, x

22, , , , xxnn has been obtained from repeated measurements has been obtained from repeated measurements

under identical measuring conditions (i.e., all the xunder identical measuring conditions (i.e., all the xii have the same uncertainty), the have the same uncertainty), the

arithmetic meanarithmetic mean

is the best estimate of the expectation value m of the random vais the best estimate of the expectation value m of the random variable X.riable X.

With increasing sample size n, the arithmetic mean approaches m.With increasing sample size n, the arithmetic mean approaches m.

If the random variable X is associated to a If the random variable X is associated to a pdfpdf f(xf(x) with variance ) with variance σσ22, the quantity, the quantity

is the best estimate of is the best estimate of σσ22..

∑=

=N

i

ixN

X1

1

2

1

2 )(1

1)( xx

NxS

N

i

i −−

= ∑=

Page 90: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.89/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Sample estimates (b)Sample estimates (b)

The covariance estimated by two sets of simultaneous measurementThe covariance estimated by two sets of simultaneous measurements is:s is:

If xIf xii andand xxjj are function of a new variable z, then:are function of a new variable z, then:

The ratioThe ratio

is the correlation coefficient equal to 0 if the xis the correlation coefficient equal to 0 if the xii andand xxjj are uncorrelated and equal to 1 if are uncorrelated and equal to 1 if

they are fully uncorrelated.they are fully uncorrelated.

2)(),cov( zsz

x

z

xxx

jiji ∂

∂∂

=

∑=

−−−

=N

i

jjkiikji xxxxn

xx1

))((1

1),cov(

2

)()(

),cov(),(

ji

ji

jixsxs

xxxx =ρ

Page 91: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.90/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

STATISICS APPLIED TO COUNTINGSTATISICS APPLIED TO COUNTING

Page 92: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.91/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Counting UncertaintyCounting Uncertainty

Random error gives rise to imprecision, or irreproducibility, inRandom error gives rise to imprecision, or irreproducibility, in any scientific experiment, any scientific experiment,

but in particle counting (activity measurements, neutron flux mebut in particle counting (activity measurements, neutron flux measurements,asurements, dosimetrydosimetry,,

) its influence is compounded by the fact that particle emission) its influence is compounded by the fact that particle emission and detection and detection

themselves are random, i.e. stochastic, phenomenon.themselves are random, i.e. stochastic, phenomenon.

Even with the most precise instrument and observer, any two consEven with the most precise instrument and observer, any two consecutive readings of ecutive readings of

particle count will probably not be the same.particle count will probably not be the same.

The potential for systematic error arises both from uncertaintieThe potential for systematic error arises both from uncertainties associated with the s associated with the

measurements of ancillary data, such as efficiencies and dead timeasurements of ancillary data, such as efficiencies and dead times, needed to calculate mes, needed to calculate

the count rate from a simple counts of events in a given time, athe count rate from a simple counts of events in a given time, and from instrumental and nd from instrumental and

operator bias.operator bias.

Page 93: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.92/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Standard uncertainty of the counting rateStandard uncertainty of the counting rate

The process of radioactive decay is a random sequence in time.The process of radioactive decay is a random sequence in time.

From the law of radioactive decay the decay rate From the law of radioactive decay the decay rate ρρ==dN/dtdN/dt can be treated as a constant.can be treated as a constant.

The decay rate The decay rate ρρ of a sample bears a known relationship, through the counting efof a sample bears a known relationship, through the counting efficiency, to the ficiency, to the truetrue counting counting

rate, rate, ρρ ..

However, counting for a finite period of time t can only yield aHowever, counting for a finite period of time t can only yield an estimate r=n estimate r=n/tn/t of the of the truetrue counting rate, rcounting rate, r ..

The measured r is subject to statistical fluctuations. A measuThe measured r is subject to statistical fluctuations. A measure for the scatter of the measured counting rate r re for the scatter of the measured counting rate r

around the around the truetrue counting rate rcounting rate r can be derived from the Poisson assumption. Such a measure is pcan be derived from the Poisson assumption. Such a measure is provided by rovided by

the standard deviation.the standard deviation.

The standard deviation of r is a function of t and can be expresThe standard deviation of r is a function of t and can be expressed as:sed as:

Because Because ρρ is unknown, only an estimate, is unknown, only an estimate, ssrr, of the standard deviation, , of the standard deviation, σσrr, can be computed from the measured , can be computed from the measured

r, namely:r, namely:

An estimate of the standard deviation of the number of counts isAn estimate of the standard deviation of the number of counts is::

tr

ρσ

′=

ntt

rsr

1==

nsn =

Page 94: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.93/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Performance of counting systemsPerformance of counting systems

The following limits apply to representative The following limits apply to representative multipletsmultiplets of the standard deviation in the theoretical distribution:of the standard deviation in the theoretical distribution:

The above limits allow an appraisal of the performance of a counThe above limits allow an appraisal of the performance of a counting system to be quickly made, i.e., if a ting system to be quickly made, i.e., if a

counting rate deviates more than what would be expected statisticounting rate deviates more than what would be expected statistically from a previously determined rate.cally from a previously determined rate.

This is important when equipment is checked routinely with a perThis is important when equipment is checked routinely with a performance standard (check source).formance standard (check source).

The application of this general description can be formalised thThe application of this general description can be formalised through the use of rough the use of control chartscontrol charts that provide a that provide a

running graphical record of the values obtained from counting a running graphical record of the values obtained from counting a reference source or of their variability.reference source or of their variability.

deviation ±0.675σ ±1σ ±2σ ±3σ

probability that observation lies within this deviation

0.5 0.68 0.95 0.997

Page 95: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.94/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Counting the necessary to reach a Counting the necessary to reach a desired degree of uncertaintydesired degree of uncertainty

In most instances the radiation counter exhibits a background raIn most instances the radiation counter exhibits a background rate that is not negligible and that has to be te that is not negligible and that has to be

subtracted from the gross counting rate.subtracted from the gross counting rate.

An estimate of the statistical error due to the background must An estimate of the statistical error due to the background must be included in the final uncertainty budget.be included in the final uncertainty budget.

On the basis that the source and background counts are additive,On the basis that the source and background counts are additive, the standard deviation of the counting rate is:the standard deviation of the counting rate is:

where T refers to the counting of the sample plus background (towhere T refers to the counting of the sample plus background (total) and B to the counting of the background tal) and B to the counting of the background

alone.alone.

The optimum subdivision of the available time between backgroundThe optimum subdivision of the available time between background and source counting has been derived by and source counting has been derived by

LoevingerLoevinger and Berman (1951), and is given by:and Berman (1951), and is given by:

To approximate the optimum division, estimates of To approximate the optimum division, estimates of ρρBB and and ρρTT have to be obtained from a preliminary run.have to be obtained from a preliminary run.

B

B

T

TBTr

tt

ρρσσσ

′+

′=+= 22

T

B

T

B

t

t

ρρ

′′

=

Page 96: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.95/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

UNCERTAINTY PROPAGATIONUNCERTAINTY PROPAGATION

Page 97: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.96/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Propagation of uncertainties (a)Propagation of uncertainties (a)

In most experiments the quantity of interest is not the one thatIn most experiments the quantity of interest is not the one that can be measured.can be measured.

Instead, its value has to be derives from values of several otheInstead, its value has to be derives from values of several other quantities.r quantities.

If a quantity X is a function of p quantities zIf a quantity X is a function of p quantities z11, z, z22,, ,, zzpp

where each of the values where each of the values zzkk of the quantities of the quantities ZZkk has an associated uncertainty has an associated uncertainty S(zS(zkk), the ), the uncertainty of the value x for the quantity X is obtained by appuncertainty of the value x for the quantity X is obtained by applying the lying the error propagation lawerror propagation lawof Gauss which provides a variance for the value x according toof Gauss which provides a variance for the value x according to

This equation is valid This equation is valid onlyonly if the quantities if the quantities ZZkk are independent (uncorrelated), if the distribution are independent (uncorrelated), if the distribution of each of each ZZkk is a Gaussian distribution and if:is a Gaussian distribution and if:

If these conditions are satisfied, the quantity x tends towards If these conditions are satisfied, the quantity x tends towards a Gaussian distribution with a a Gaussian distribution with a variance given by the svariance given by the s22(x).(x).

)()( 2

1

2

2

k

p

izk

zSz

FxS

k

∑= ⎥

⎢⎢

⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

∂∂

=

),...,,( 21 nzzzFX =

kk zzS <<)(

Page 98: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.97/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Propagation of uncertainties (b)Propagation of uncertainties (b)

More generally, if the individual quantities More generally, if the individual quantities ZZkk are correlated the error propagation law is:are correlated the error propagation law is:

),(2)()(1

2

1

2

2

jk

p

kiz

jzk

p

k

k

p

izk

zzSz

F

z

FzS

z

FxS

jkk

∑∑∑<==

⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

∂∂

⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

∂∂

+⎥⎥

⎢⎢

⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

∂∂

=

),...,,( 21 nzzzFX =

Page 99: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.98/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Mathematical expressionsMathematical expressions

Error propagation lawError propagation law

),cov(2

),...,,(

2

1

2

2

21

ji

p

ki ji

x

p

i i

Y

p

xxx

f

x

fS

x

fS

xxxfY

i ∑∑<= ∂

∂∂∂

+⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

∂∂

=

=

)()(1

1),cov(

)(1

1

1

1

22

jjk

n

k

iikji

n

k

iikx

xxxxn

xx

xxn

Si

−−−

=

−−

=

=

=

Sample estimatesSample estimates

2),cov(,...)(

,...)(z

jiji

jj

iiS

z

x

z

xxx

zxx

zxx

∂∂

=⇒⎭⎬⎫

⎩⎨⎧

=

=

⎪⎪⎭

⎪⎪⎬

⎪⎪⎩

⎪⎪⎨

−=∂∂

=∂∂

⇒=

22

1

1

2

1

11

1

xx

Y

Y

xx

Y

Y

x

xY

Useful expressionsUseful expressions

2

2

2

1

2

21

21

2

1

21

0),cov(⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛+⎟⎟

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛=⎟

⎞⎜⎝

⎛⇒

⎪⎪⎪

⎪⎪⎪

⎪⎪⎪

⎪⎪⎪

=

=

=

X

S

X

S

Y

S

xx

xxY

x

xY

XXY

)(

)()(

i

iii

i xf

xfxxf

x

f −∆+≈

∂∂

Page 100: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.99/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

The following quantities are required The following quantities are required for uncertainty evaluation:for uncertainty evaluation:

),cov(2

),...,,(

2

1

2

2

21

ji

p

ki ji

x

p

i i

Y

p

xxx

f

x

fS

x

fS

xxxfY

i ∑∑<= ∂

∂∂∂

+⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

∂∂

=

=

),cov(

),...,,(

2

21

ji

x

i

p

xx

S

x

f

xxxfY

i

∂∂

= Obtained by measurement, Obtained by measurement, calculation, estimation, calculation, estimation,

importation, derivation, importation, derivation,

A MODEL IS NEEDED !A MODEL IS NEEDED !

Page 101: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.100/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

WorksopWorksop onon UnderstandingUnderstanding andand EvaluatingEvaluating

RadioanalyticalRadioanalytical MeasurementMeasurement UncertaintyUncertainty

UNCERTAINTY IN GAMMA UNCERTAINTY IN GAMMA SPECTROMETRYSPECTROMETRY

1. Metrology, measurement fundamentals

2. Uncertainty evaluation theory

3. Uncertainty components in gamma spectrometry

4. Methods for uncertainty determination

5. Application, exercises, Examples, Discussion

6. Characteristic limits

7. Quality control

8. Discussion with participants

Page 102: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.101/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Main sources of Main sources of uncertainty inuncertainty ingammagamma--rayray

spectrometryspectrometry

1.1. Activity of standard sourceActivity of standard source

2.2. SamplingSampling

3.3. Source aliquotSource aliquot

4.4. PeakPeak--area measurementarea measurement

5.5. Background peak area variationsBackground peak area variations

6.6. Variation in sample attenuationVariation in sample attenuation

7.7. SourceSource--detector geometrydetector geometry

8.8. Dead time correction (LT/RT)Dead time correction (LT/RT)

9.9. Pulse pilePulse pile--upup

10.10. Coincidence summingCoincidence summing

11.11. Random summingRandom summing

12.12. Radioactive decayRadioactive decay

13.13. Photon emission probabilityPhoton emission probability

14.14. FullFull--energy peak efficiencyenergy peak efficiency

15.15. MultipletsMultiplets deconvolutiondeconvolution

EXERCISE:EXERCISE:

As groups, consider the following sources of As groups, consider the following sources of uncertainty and:uncertainty and:

a)a) Propose a method to estimate each Propose a method to estimate each uncertainty componentuncertainty component

b)b) Identify type of evaluation (A or B)Identify type of evaluation (A or B)

c)c) Make an estimate of its typical valueMake an estimate of its typical value

Page 103: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.102/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

WorksopWorksop onon UnderstandingUnderstanding andand EvaluatingEvaluating

RadioanalyticalRadioanalytical MeasurementMeasurement UncertaintyUncertainty

UNCERTAINTY IN GAMMA UNCERTAINTY IN GAMMA SPECTROMETRYSPECTROMETRY

1. Metrology, measurement fundamentals

2. Uncertainty evaluation theory

3. Uncertainty components in gamma spectrometry

4. Methods for uncertainty determination

5. Application, exercises, Examples, Discussion

6. Characteristic limits

7. Quality control

8. Discussion with participants

Page 104: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.103/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

CORRECIONS AND ASSOCIATED CORRECIONS AND ASSOCIATED UNCERTAINTIES IN GAMMA UNCERTAINTIES IN GAMMA

SPECTROMETRYSPECTROMETRY

Page 105: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.104/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Efficiency transferEfficiency transferA: Source Activity (Iγ =1)

where: R: Net count rate

ε: Counting efficiency

Under non-reproducible conditions (ε not constant):

εAR =

x

S

S

x

SSx

S

S

xS

x

S

S

xx

SSS

xxx

k

k

kAR

RA

R

RA

AR

AR

εε

εεε

εε

εε

ε

ε

=

==

==

=

=where:x: Problem sourceS: Standard source

The constant k can be experimentally or

theoretically determined and used to derive

the corrected efficiency.

Methods used:

Analytical expressions

Monte Carlo calculation

Semiempirical models

Page 106: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.105/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

COINCIDENCECOINCIDENCE--SUMMINGSUMMING

Page 107: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.106/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

COINCIDENCECOINCIDENCE--SUMMING:SUMMING:occursoccurs forfor radionuclidesradionuclides emittingemitting twotwo or more or more photonsphotons

withinwithin the the spectrometerspectrometer resolvingresolving timetime

rivelator

e

A: Single A: Single photonsphotons

rivelatore

B:B: CoincidentCoincident photonsphotons

Page 108: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.107/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

COINCIDENCECOINCIDENCE--SUMMING:SUMMING:spectrumspectrum deformationdeformation

a)a) PhotoelectricPhotoelectric--ComptonCompton::summingsumming outout

b)b) PhotoelectricPhotoelectric--photoelectricphotoelectric::summingsumming inin

2111 121 tAkAIn εεεγ −=

2112 12' εεAkn =

Page 109: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.108/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

COINCIDENCECOINCIDENCE--SUMMING:SUMMING:loss of events from fullloss of events from full--energy peakenergy peak

A: Single photonsA: Single photons

B: Coincident photonsB: Coincident photons

Page 110: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.109/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Magnitude of coincidenceMagnitude of coincidence--summing effectsumming effect

a) p-type detectors

b) n-type detectorsXγ

10-100%

HPGe

10 %

HPGe

50 %

HPGe

50 % 100 %

Page 111: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.110/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

CoincidenceCoincidence--summingsumming::a common source of a common source of systematicsystematic errorserrors inin

gammagamma--spectrometryspectrometry

ExampleExample::ItalianItalian gammagamma--spectrometryspectrometryproficiencyproficiency test (1998)test (1998)

C s-1 3 7

-1 5

-1 0

-5

0

5

1 0

1 5

2 4 / 1 5 8 9 / 2 1 1 1 2 / 2

P a r tic i p a n t c o d e

Rela

tive d

evia

tio

n (

%)

C s-1 3 4

-2 0

-1 5

-1 0

-5

0

5

1 0

2 4 / 1 5 8 9 / 2 1 1 1 2 /2

P a r ti c i p a n t c o d e

Rela

tive d

evia

tio

n (

%)

Page 112: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.111/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

ExampleExample:: coincidencecoincidence summingsumming correctioncorrectionin gamma in gamma spectrometryspectrometry (Co(Co--60)60)

( )211 1 tAn εε −=

( )122 1 tAn εε −=

Page 113: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.112/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

COINCIDENCECOINCIDENCE--SUMMING CORRECTIONSUMMING CORRECTIONExampleExample 2: Cs2: Cs--134, 569 134, 569 keVkeV

( )6677555 1 tt PPAIn εεε −−=

i E (keV)

3 475.34

4 563.23

5 569.32

6 604.69

7 795.84

8 801.93

9 1038.56

10 1167.92

11 1365.16

t

kPα+

=1

1

77

66

55

Page 114: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.113/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

ExapleExaple:: coincidencecoincidence summingsummingcorrectioncorrection in gamma in gamma specptrometryspecptrometry

iii CAIniεγ=

Correction factor: Ci

⎥⎥⎥

⎢⎢⎢

⎡−

⎥⎥⎥

⎢⎢⎢

⎡+=

∑∑

i

ij

i

km

I

PPP

1I

PPP

1Cj

jtjit

i

m,kmkmkt

iγγ

ε

ε

εε

[Semkov, 1990]

∑∑ +−=mk

mkmkti

jjtjitii PPPAPPPAAIn

kmiji

,

εεεεεγ

s

k

m

j

i

Page 115: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.114/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Methods for coincidenceMethods for coincidence--summingsummingcorrectionscorrections

Analytical expression [Analytical expression [HoppesHoppes, 1983], [, 1983], [BlawnBlawn, 1993], 1993]

Monte Carlo Methods [Monte Carlo Methods [SimaSima, 1996], 1996]

Simplified semiSimplified semi--empirical methods [De empirical methods [De FeliceFelice, 2000], 2000]

Page 116: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.115/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

UNCERTAINTY EVALUATIONUNCERTAINTY EVALUATIONThe uncertainty of the total efficiency, The uncertainty of the total efficiency, εεtiti, is transferred to , is transferred to CCii by the by the usual error propagation lawusual error propagation law

Input uncertainties are "compressed" by partial derivatives and Input uncertainties are "compressed" by partial derivatives and the the output uncertainties of output uncertainties of CCii are notably reducedare notably reduced

Example:Example: Point source on detector window, 604.7 Point source on detector window, 604.7 keVkeV,, 134134Cs .Cs .

Photon N.

Photon

energy

(keV)

C6

4 563.2 1.695

5 569.3 1.674

6 604.7 1.323

7 795.9 1.327

11 1365.2

(569+796)

0.696 0

2

4

6

8

10

0 10 20 30

IUncertainty of the total efficiency (%)

Un

cert

ain

ty c

om

po

nen

t o

f C

6 (%

)

563,2 keV

569,3 keV

795,9 keV

1365,2 keV

Page 117: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.116/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

CORRECTIONCORRECTIONPROCEDUREPROCEDURE

0,008

0,009

0,010

0,011

0,012

0,013

0,014

0,015

0 20 40 60 80

Relative efficiency (%)

K (

1/k

eV)

iiCAIiεγ=in

⎥⎥⎥

⎢⎢⎢

−⎥⎥⎥

⎢⎢⎢

+=∑∑

i

jij

i

km

I

PPP

I

PPP

Cj

tjit

i

mk

mkmkt

i

γγ

ε

ε

εε

11,

R = Rε/Rσ = KEγ

γσ

εε

EKR

j

t j=

Page 118: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.117/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

DENSITY CORRECTIONSDENSITY CORRECTIONS

Page 119: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.118/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

SelfSelf--absorption effectabsorption effect

Sample density from 0,4 to 3 kg/dmSample density from 0,4 to 3 kg/dm33

Sample thickness from 5 to 30 mmSample thickness from 5 to 30 mm

Importance of chemical composition at low Importance of chemical composition at low

energy (E<100 energy (E<100 keVkeV))

Page 120: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.119/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Methods for selfMethods for self--absorption correctionabsorption correction

Empirical methodsEmpirical methods

Analytical methods [Analytical methods [eses.. SimaSima, 1992], 1992]

Numerical methods [Numerical methods [eses.. DebertinDebertin, 1989], 1989]

Monte Carlo methods [Monte Carlo methods [LepyLepy,, SimaSima]]

Page 121: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.120/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

NN00: photon emission rate per unit volume: photon emission rate per unit volume

µµ: linear attenuation coefficient: linear attenuation coefficient

εεpp: intrinsic full: intrinsic full--energyenergy--peak efficiencypeak efficiency

εε: total efficiency: total efficiency

R: fullR: full--energyenergy--peak count ratepeak count rate

∆∆S: detector area (supposed spherical)S: detector area (supposed spherical)

t: equivalent thicknesst: equivalent thickness

∫π

ε∆=ε −µ−

V

)rr(

2

pdVe

r

1

V4

Sm

[ ]∫ Ω−πη

ε∆=ε

∆Ω

µ−de1

V4

S lp

[ ].e1V4

S tp µ−−∆Ωπη

ε∆=ε Ω∫

∆Ω=

∆Ωdl

1t

s

reft

t

ref

s

ref

s

e1

e1

µ

µ

−=

ε

εµ−

µ−

SelfSelf absorbtionabsorbtion correctioncorrection (1)(1)[Sima O., [Sima O., HealthHealth PhysicsPhysics 6262, 445 (1992)], 445 (1992)]

Page 122: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.121/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

GEOMETRY CORRECTIONSGEOMETRY CORRECTIONS

Page 123: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.122/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Efficiency variation with distanceEfficiency variation with distance

Basic approachBasic approach

oo (d(d00) measured) measured

oo (d) obtained by calculation(d) obtained by calculation

oo HP:HP: geometry independentgeometry independent

oo Not very good approximationNot very good approximation

ExtensionExtension

oo New conceptNew concept

oo Fictitious point detectorFictitious point detector

oo Located at effective detector Located at effective detector

centrecentre

⎥⎥⎦

⎢⎢⎣

⎡⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛+−=Ω

ΩΩ

=

− 2/1

2

2

0

112)(

)(

)(0

d

Rd

d

ddd

π

εεd

R

d

R de

( )

e

e

e

e

edd

dd

dddn

dddn

dd

dd

−=⇒

=+∝

+∝

+Ω+Ω

=

0)(

1

)(

1)(

)(

)(

2

00

εε

Page 124: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.123/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Area sources (1/2)Area sources (1/2)

[[AlfassiAlfassi, 1975], 1975]

oo a: area sourcea: area source

oo p: point sourcep: point source

oo pp(r,d(r,d) experimentally ) experimentally

determineddetermined

oo accuracy accuracy ±±22--5%5%

2

0

2

)(

2

2

1),0()(

),(2

)(

),0(),(

S

cR

pa

R

p

S

a

rdc

pp

cR

edd

rdrdrR

d

eddr

S

S

−=

⇒=

=

εε

εε

εε

d

R

d

R

RS

d

R

r

Page 125: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.124/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Area sources (2/2)Area sources (2/2)

Basic approachBasic approach

oo a: area sourcea: area source

oo p: point sourcep: point source

oo accuracy accuracy ±±2% for R/d<0.52% for R/d<0.5

⎥⎥⎦

⎢⎢⎣

⎡+⎟⎟

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛+−⎟⎟

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛+−≈Ω=Ω

ΩΩ

=

−−

∫ ...18

311

2

1),(

2)(

)(

)()()(

2/5

2

2

4

22

2/1

2

2

0

2d

R

d

RR

d

Rrdrdr

Rd

d

ddd

S

R

p

S

a

p

apa

S

εε

d

R

d

R

RS

Page 126: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.125/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

WorksopWorksop onon UnderstandingUnderstanding andand EvaluatingEvaluating

RadioanalyticalRadioanalytical MeasurementMeasurement UncertaintyUncertainty

UNCERTAINTY IN GAMMA UNCERTAINTY IN GAMMA SPECTROMETRYSPECTROMETRY

1. Metrology, measurement fundamentals

2. Uncertainty evaluation theory

3. Uncertainty components in gamma spectrometry

4. Methods for uncertainty determination

5. Application, exercises, Examples, Discussion

6. Characteristic limits

7. Quality control

8. Discussion with participants

Page 127: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.126/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example N. 1Example N. 1Variability of activity values of a set of sourcesVariability of activity values of a set of sources

Excel file from ENEAExcel file from ENEA--INMRIINMRI

Page 128: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.127/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example N. 2Example N. 2Uncertainty of the counting efficiencyUncertainty of the counting efficiency

Symbol Quantity Value Unit Standard

Uncertainty

Relative

Standard

Uncertainty

(%)

T1/2 Half-life 462.6 d 0.4 0.086

Iγ Photon emission probability 3.65 % 0.06 1.64

Ac Activity at reference date 20130 Bq 50 0.25

T Counting Time 80000 s 160 0.2

CT Gross counts 163133 - 403 0.25

CB Background counts 14013 - 118 0.84

CN Net counts 149129 - 420 0.28

∆T Decay time 1095.75 d negligible negligible

DF Decay factor 0.19362 - 0.00027 0.14

ε Counting efficiency 1.31 % 0.02 1.7

Expressions

TT CCu =)(

BB CCu =)(

BTN CCC −= 22 )()()( BTN CuCuCu +=

))2ln(exp(21T

TDF

∆−= )(

)2ln()( 212

21

TuT

TDFDFu

∆=

DFATI

C

c

N

γ

ε = ∑ ⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛=

i i

i

x

xuu

2

)()(ε

Counting efficiency: Uncertainty budget

Source of uncertainty Expression Value (%)

Counting statisticsNN CCu /)( 0.28

Timing TTu /)( 0.2

Emission probabilityγγ IIu /)( 1.64

Standard source activitycc AAu /)( 0.25

Decay DFDFu /)( 0.14

Combined standard uncertainty quadratic sum 1.7

Page 129: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.128/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example N. 3Example N. 3Uncertainty of the difference of net count ratesUncertainty of the difference of net count rates

Symbol Quantity Value Unit Standard

Uncertainty

Relative

Standard

Uncertainty

(%)

b background count rate 200 1/s 14.0 7.0

n1 gross count rate sample 1 230 1/s 13.8 6.0

n2 gross count rate sample 2 300 1/s 15.0 5.0

A1 net count rate sample 1 30 1/s 19.66 65.5

A2 net count rate sample 2 100 1/s 20.52 20.5

D Difference of net count rates 70 1/s 20.38 29.1

Expressions

bnA −= 1122

11 )()()( bunuAu +=

bnA −= 2222

22 )()()( bunuAu +=

1212 nnAAD −=−= 2

2

2

1 )()()( nunuDu +=

),cov( 21 AA 22 )()()1)(1( bb susu =−−

D: Uncertainty

budgetD=A2-A1 D=n2-n1

Source of uncertainty Expression ValueValue

(%)Value

Value

(%)

A1 or n1 )()( 11

1

AuAuA

D=

∂∂

-19.66 s-1

28.1 )()( 11

1

nunun

D=

∂∂

-13.8 s-1

19.7

A2 or n2 )()( 22

2

AuAuA

D=

∂∂

+20.52 s-1

29.3)()( 22

2

nunun

D−=

∂∂

-15.0 s-1

21.4

SUB TOTAL 28.42 s-1

40.6 20.38 s-1

29.1

Correlations between

A1 and A2

2

21

21

)(2),cov(2 bsuAAA

D

A

D−=

∂∂

∂∂

-392 s-2

Combined standard

uncertainty20.38 s

-129.1

Background: source of correlation between net count ratesBackground: source of correlation between net count rates

Page 130: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.129/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example N. 4Example N. 4Uncertainty of the ratio of activity valuesUncertainty of the ratio of activity values

Nuclear data: source of correlation Nuclear data: source of correlation between resultsbetween results

Symbol Quantity Value Unit Standard

Uncertainty

Relative

Standard

Uncertainty

(%)

n1 net count rate lab 1 10.0 1/s 0.10 1

n2 net count rate lab 2 12.1 1/s 0.12 1

1 full-energy peak efficiency lab 1 1.01 % 0.01 1

2 full-energy peak efficiency lab 2 0.82 % 0.0082 1

I photon emission probability 0.1 - 0.05 50

A1 sample activity lab 1 9.90 kBq 4.95 50.02

A2 sample activity lab 2 14.76 kBq 7.41 50.02

R Ratio A1 / A2 0.6707 - 0.013 2.0

Expressions

γε I

nA

1

11 = 22

1

2

11 )(')(')(')(' γε IuunuAu ++=

γε I

nA

2

22 = 22

2

2

22 )(')(')(')(' γε IuunuAu ++=

0),cov(: 21 =εεHP -

21 / AAR = ),cov(2

)(')(')(' 21

21

2

2

2

2

1 AAA

R

A

R

RAuAuRu

∂∂

∂∂

++=

),cov( 21 AA2

2

2121 )(),cov( γ

γ

IuI

AAAA =

R : U n c e r t a i n t y

b u d g e tR=A1/A2

12

21

εε

n

nR =

Source of uncertainty Expression ValueRel.

Value Expression Value Rel. Value

A1 )(')(1

11

1

AuAuA

R

R=

∂∂

0.5002 )(')(1

11

1

nunun

R

R=

∂∂

0.01

A2 )(')(1

22

2

AuAuA

R

R=

∂∂

0.5002 )(')(1

22

2

nunun

R

R=

∂∂

0.01

SUB TOTAL 2

2

2

1 )(')(' AuAu + 0.70739 )(')(1

11

1

εεε

uuR

R=

∂∂

0.01

Correlations between A1

and A2

2

21

21

2)('2),cov(

2γIuAA

A

R

A

R

R−=

∂∂

∂∂

-0.5000 )(')(1

22

2

εεε

uuR

R=

∂∂

0.01

Combined standard

uncertainty),cov(

2)(')(' 21

21

2

2

2

2

1 AAA

R

A

R

RAuAu

∂∂

∂∂

++ 0.02 ∑ 2)(' ixu 0.02

Page 131: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.130/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example N. 5Example N. 5Uncertainty of the activity value (CoUncertainty of the activity value (Co--60)60)

TheThe --ray spectrometer calibrated by a Coray spectrometer calibrated by a Co--6060standard source.standard source.

Arithmetic mean of two results (1173 and Arithmetic mean of two results (1173 and 13321332 keVkeV).).

Symbol Quantity Value Unit Standard Relative

Standard

Uncertainty Uncertainty

(%)

c1 net count rate (P1) calibr. source 10 0.1 1.0

c2 net count rate (P2) calibr. source 9.8 0.098 1.0

AS Activity calibration source 1000 30 3.0

n1 net count rate (P1) probl. source 11.1 0.111 1.0

n2 net count rate (P2) probl. source 10.3 0.103 1.0

1 FEP efficiency (P1) 0.01 0.000316228 3.16

2 FEP efficiency (P2) 0.0098 0.000309903 3.16

a1 - 1.11 0.015697771 1.41

a2 - 1.051 0.014863673 1.41

X1 Activity problem source (P1) 1110 36.81453517 3.32

Expressions

S

ii

A

c=ε ( ) ( ) ( )22

''' Sii Aucuu +=ε

i

Si

i

ii

c

AnnX ==

ε ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )222'''' Siii AucunuXu ++=

i

ii

c

na = ( ) ( ) ( )22

''' iii cunuau +=

SX AaaXX

A22

2121 +=

+=

),cov( 21 XX 2

21 )( SAuaa

AX: Uncertainty

budget 2

21 XXAX

+= sX A

aaA

2

21 +=

Source of uncertainty Expression ValueRel.

Value Expression Value

Rel.

Value

X1 )(2

1)( 11

1

XuXuX

A=

∂∂

18.407 )(2

)( 11

1

auA

aua

A SX =∂∂

7.849

X2 )(2

1)( 22

2

XuXuX

A=

∂∂

17.429 )(2

)( 22

2

auA

aua

A SX =∂∂

7.432

- - - )(2

)( 21SS

S

X Auaa

AuA

A +=

∂∂

32.415

SUB TOTAL

2

2

2

2

1

1

)()( ⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

∂∂

+⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

∂∂

XuX

AXu

X

A25.35 - 34.17

Correlations between

A1 and A2

2

2121

21

)(2

1),cov(2 S

XX AuaaXXX

A

X

A=

∂∂

∂∂

525.0 -

Combined standard

uncertainty),cov(2)()( 21

21

2

2

2

2

1

1

XXX

A

X

AXu

X

AXu

X

A XX

∂∂

∂∂

+⎥⎦

⎤⎢⎣

∂∂

+⎥⎦

⎤⎢⎣

∂∂

34.17 -

Page 132: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.131/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example N. 6Example N. 6Uncertainty of the activity value (CdUncertainty of the activity value (Cd--109)109)

Nuclear data: source of correlation between results [Rif. ExamplNuclear data: source of correlation between results [Rif. Example. 2]e. 2]Symbol Quantity Value Unit Standard

Uncertainty

Relative

Standard

Uncertainty

(%)

CTX Gross counts 102415 - 320 0.31

CBX Background counts 8841 - 94 1.06

CNX Net counts 93574 - 333 0.36

TX Counting Time 80000 s 160 0.2

ε Counting efficiency 1.31 % 0.02 1.7

Expressions

DFATI

C

c

N

γ

ε =

NX

CN

NX

CN

X

N

XCT

DFTAC

CIT

DFATIC

IT

CA XXX ===

γ

γ

γ ε

AX: Uncertainty budgetεγIT

CA

X

N

XX=

NX

CN

XCT

DFTACA X=

Source of uncertainty Expression Value Rel. Value Expression ValueRel.

Value

CNX )('XNCu 0.356 )('

XNCu 0.28

TX )(' Tu 0.200 )(' Tu 0.2

I )(' γIu -1.6438 )('C

Au 0.25

ε )(' εu 1.704 )(' DFu 0.14

− - )(' XTu 0.200

)('N

Cu 0.356

SUB TOTAL 2.403 0.606

Correlation between I and 2

2)('2),cov(2

1γγ

γ

εε

IuIA

I

A

A

XX

X

−=∂

∂-5.38 10

-4 -

0.000540416

Combined standard

uncertainty 0.607

( ) ( ) ( )

( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( )γγγγ

γγ

γγ

γ

γγ

γγ

γ

γγ

γ

γγεε

ε

εε

εε

εε

IuuIuuIuI

IuI

IuI

IA

AI

A

AIu

II

IA

I

A

AI

A

I

A

A

compIIcomp

X

X

X

X

XX

X

XX

X

'2''211

2

1122

1),cov(2

1

.

2

22

−==⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎝

⎛−⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛−=

=⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

∂∂

⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

∂⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

∂∂

⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

∂∂

=∂∂

∂∂

∂∂

=∂

∂∂∂

Page 133: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.132/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example N. 7aExample N. 7aReproducibility of counting geometryReproducibility of counting geometry

[M.[M. MakarewicsMakarewics, 2005], 2005]

d

R

RS

h

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛ +−++−=Ω

ΩΩ

=

22222211),(

)(

),()(),(

RdRhdh

hd

d

hddhd

a

p

apa εε

)(4

)1(24

2

2

22Rd

dR

Rd

df

g>>≅

+−=

Ω= π

π

This expression was obtained by integration over h This expression was obtained by integration over h of the fractional solid angle for point source:of the fractional solid angle for point source:

Page 134: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.133/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example N. 7bExample N. 7b(Reproducibility of counting geometry(Reproducibility of counting geometry

[M.[M. MakarewicsMakarewics, 2005], 2005]

d

R

RS

h

h

S

hd

hdhhd

h

S

h

SS

h

S

Sh

Sx

fS

hdxxxfY

hhhh

h

hx

ih

p

i

),(

),(),(1

),(),...,,( 21

ΩΩ−∆+Ω

∆Ω≈

∆≈⎟

⎞⎜⎝

⎛∂∂

=

⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎝

⎛∂∂

=⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

∂∂

=

=⇒=

εεε

εε

ε

εε

ε

ε

d

S

hd

hdhdd

d

S

d

SS

d

S

Sd

Sx

fS

hdxxxfY

dddd

d

hx

id

p

i

),(

),(),(1

),(),...,,( 21

ΩΩ−∆+Ω

∆Ω≈

∆≈⎟

⎞⎜⎝

⎛∂∂

=

⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎝

⎛∂∂

=⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

∂∂

=

=⇒=

εεε

εε

ε

εε

ε

ε

Page 135: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.134/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example of uncertainty evaluation, 8Example of uncertainty evaluation, 8

According to ISO (GUM)According to ISO (GUM)

Example: components of the standard Example: components of the standard uncertainty (%) of the activity concentrationuncertainty (%) of the activity concentration

Radionuclide and corresponding photon energy (keV)

Source of uncertainty

40K1461

228Ac911

212Pb238

208Tl2614

214Pb351

214Bi609

208Tl253

228Ac830

214Pb839

dead time 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.6 1.2 1.1 1.3counting statistics 0.9 2.0 1.1 2.9 1.8 1.2 115 144 73background 0.7 1.0 1.4 1.7 4.9 5.4 92 109 78counting efficiency 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3photon emission probability 0.6 0.001 0.9 0.2 2.0 0.9 1.4 9.8 3.3spectral deconvolution 1.0 - - - 1.5 - 2.0 2.7 3.0

Combined standard uncertainty (%) 2.1 2.6 2.4 3.7 6.0 5.8 147 181 107

Page 136: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.135/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

WorksopWorksop onon UnderstandingUnderstanding andand EvaluatingEvaluating

RadioanalyticalRadioanalytical MeasurementMeasurement UncertaintyUncertainty

UNCERTAINTY IN GAMMA UNCERTAINTY IN GAMMA SPECTROMETRYSPECTROMETRY

1. Metrology, measurement fundamentals

2. Uncertainty evaluation theory

3. Uncertainty components in gamma spectrometry

4. Methods for uncertainty determination

5. Application, exercises, Examples, Discussion

6. Characteristic limits

7. Quality control

8. Discussion with participants

Page 137: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.136/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

THEORYTHEORY

Page 138: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.137/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

ISO standards (in preparation) on determination of the DetectionISO standards (in preparation) on determination of the DetectionLimit and Decision threshold for ionising radiation measurementsLimit and Decision threshold for ionising radiation measurements

(ISO/TC85/SC2/WG17)(ISO/TC85/SC2/WG17)

ISO/CD 11929ISO/CD 11929--11: Determination of the Detection Limit and Decision Threshold fo: Determination of the Detection Limit and Decision Threshold for Ionizing Radiation Measurements r Ionizing Radiation Measurements -- Part 1: Part 1:

Fundamentals and Applications to Counting Measurements without tFundamentals and Applications to Counting Measurements without the Influence of Sample Treatment.he Influence of Sample Treatment.

ISO/CD 11929ISO/CD 11929--22: Determination of the Detection Limit and Decision Threshold fo: Determination of the Detection Limit and Decision Threshold for Ionizing Radiation Measurements r Ionizing Radiation Measurements -- Part 2: Part 2:

Fundamentals and Applications to Counting Measurements with the Fundamentals and Applications to Counting Measurements with the Influence of Sample Treatment.Influence of Sample Treatment.

ISO/CD 11929ISO/CD 11929--33: Determination of the Detection Limit and Decision Threshold fo: Determination of the Detection Limit and Decision Threshold for Ionizing Radiation Measurements r Ionizing Radiation Measurements -- Part 3: Part 3:

Fundamentals and Applications to Counting Measurements by High RFundamentals and Applications to Counting Measurements by High Resolution Gamma Spectrometry, without the Influence of esolution Gamma Spectrometry, without the Influence of

Sample Treatment.Sample Treatment.

ISO/CD 11929ISO/CD 11929--44: Determination of the Detection Limit and Decision Threshold fo: Determination of the Detection Limit and Decision Threshold for Ionizing Radiation Measurements r Ionizing Radiation Measurements -- Part 4: Part 4:

Fundamentals and Applications to Measurements by Use of Linear AFundamentals and Applications to Measurements by Use of Linear Analogue nalogue RatemetersRatemeters, without the Influence of Sample , without the Influence of Sample

Treatment.Treatment.

ISO/CD 11929ISO/CD 11929--55: Determination of the Detection Limit and Decision Threshold fo: Determination of the Detection Limit and Decision Threshold for Ionizing Radiation Measurements r Ionizing Radiation Measurements -- Part 5: Part 5:

Fundamentals and Applications to Measurements of Filters During Fundamentals and Applications to Measurements of Filters During Accumulation of Radioactive Materials.Accumulation of Radioactive Materials.

ISO/CD 11929ISO/CD 11929--66: Determination of the Detection Limit and Decision Threshold fo: Determination of the Detection Limit and Decision Threshold for Ionizing Radiation Measurements r Ionizing Radiation Measurements -- Part 6: Part 6:

Fundamentals and Applications to Measurements by Use of a TransiFundamentals and Applications to Measurements by Use of a Transient Measuring Mode.ent Measuring Mode.

ISO/CD 11929ISO/CD 11929--77: Determination of the Detection Limit and Decision Threshold fo: Determination of the Detection Limit and Decision Threshold for Ionizing Radiation Measurements r Ionizing Radiation Measurements -- Part 7: Part 7:

Fundamentals and General Applications.Fundamentals and General Applications.

ISO/CD 11929ISO/CD 11929--88: Determination of the Detection Limit and Decision Threshold fo: Determination of the Detection Limit and Decision Threshold for Ionizing Radiation Measurements r Ionizing Radiation Measurements -- Part 8: Part 8:

Fundamentals and Application to Unfolding of Spectrometric MeasuFundamentals and Application to Unfolding of Spectrometric Measurements without the Influence of Sample Treatment.rements without the Influence of Sample Treatment.

Page 139: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.138/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Detection Limit and Decision threshold: DefinitionsDetection Limit and Decision threshold: Definitions

DECISION QUANTITYDECISION QUANTITY: random variable for the decision whether the physical : random variable for the decision whether the physical

effect to be measured is present or noteffect to be measured is present or not

DECISION THRESHOLDDECISION THRESHOLD: fixed value of the decision quantity by which, when : fixed value of the decision quantity by which, when

exceeded by the result of an actual measurement of a exceeded by the result of an actual measurement of a measurandmeasurand quantifying a quantifying a

physical effect, one decides that the physical effect is presentphysical effect, one decides that the physical effect is present

DETECTION LIMITDETECTION LIMIT: smallest value of the : smallest value of the measurandmeasurand which is detectable by the which is detectable by the

measuring methodmeasuring method

CONFIDENCE INTERVALCONFIDENCE INTERVAL: values which define confidence intervals to be : values which define confidence intervals to be

specified for the specified for the measurandmeasurand in question which, if the result exceeds the decision in question which, if the result exceeds the decision

threshold, includes the true value of the threshold, includes the true value of the measurandmeasurand with a given probabilitywith a given probability

Page 140: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.139/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Three simple questions in particle countingThree simple questions in particle counting

NN00 : BACKGROUND counts: BACKGROUND counts

NNss : SAMPLE counts: SAMPLE counts

QUESTION NQUESTION N°°11: Which is the value of the net count that, when exceeded by the: Which is the value of the net count that, when exceeded by the

result of an actual measurement, one decides that there is a rearesult of an actual measurement, one decides that there is a real contribution from l contribution from

the sample ?the sample ?

QUESTION NQUESTION N°°22: Which is the smallest value of the sample contribution that is: Which is the smallest value of the sample contribution that is

detectable by the measuring system ?detectable by the measuring system ?

QUESTION NQUESTION N°° 33: If such a contribution has been detected, which is the interva: If such a contribution has been detected, which is the intervall

that includes the true value with a given probability ?that includes the true value with a given probability ?

Page 141: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.140/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Possible answer to question N. 1Possible answer to question N. 1

Compare NCompare Nss with Nwith N

00, considering the statistical fluctuation of N, considering the statistical fluctuation of N00::

oo Var(NVar(N00)= N)= N

00 (Poisson) (Poisson)

oo L=3 (NL=3 (N00 ))1/21/2 (3(3σσ Criteria, ICRU 22, 1979)Criteria, ICRU 22, 1979)

PROBLEMS:PROBLEMS:

1:1: arbitrary choice of the factor 3;arbitrary choice of the factor 3;

2:2: NS>L: can be a background fluctuation ?NS>L: can be a background fluctuation ?

3:3: NS<N0: there is no contribution from the sample ?NS<N0: there is no contribution from the sample ?

A MORE RIGOROUS ANSWER IS NEEDED: A MORE RIGOROUS ANSWER IS NEEDED:

Page 142: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.141/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Answer to question N. 1 (Decision threshold)Answer to question N. 1 (Decision threshold)

DECISION THRESHOLDDECISION THRESHOLD::

NNnn**==KKαασσnn (Currie, 1968)(Currie, 1968)

THE DECISION THRESHOLD is the THE DECISION THRESHOLD is the critical value for the statistical test for critical value for the statistical test for the decision between the hypothesis the decision between the hypothesis that the sample effect is not present that the sample effect is not present and the alternative hypothesis that it is and the alternative hypothesis that it is present. When the critical value is present. When the critical value is exceeded by the result of an actual exceeded by the result of an actual measurement this is taken to indicate measurement this is taken to indicate that the hypothesis should be rejected. that the hypothesis should be rejected. The statistical test shall be designed The statistical test shall be designed such that the probability of wrongly such that the probability of wrongly rejecting the hypothesis (error of the rejecting the hypothesis (error of the

first kind) is equal to a given value first kind) is equal to a given value αα..

σn=(2ν0)1/2

α

ν n=0 N n*

N n

HP: νn=0 (νs=ν0) σn=(2ν0)1/2 NO contribution from sample

α Kα

0,1 1,28

0,05 1,64

0,025 1,96

0,001 3,09

COUNTS EXPECTATION VALUE

STANDARD DEVIATION

BACKGROUND0N 0υ

00 υσ =SAMPLE

sN sυss υσ =

NET0NNN sn −= 0υυυ −= sn 0υυσ += sn

0

*32.205.0 υα =⇒= nN

nn kN σα=*

02υσ =n

Page 143: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.142/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Answer to question N. 2 (Detection limit)Answer to question N. 2 (Detection limit)

DECISION THRESHOLDDECISION THRESHOLD::

ννnn**==NNnn+K+Kββσσnn=(=(KKαα+K+Kββ)) σσnn(Currie(Currie, 1968), 1968)

THE DETECTION LIMIT is the smallest THE DETECTION LIMIT is the smallest

true value of the true value of the measurandmeasurand which is which is

associated with the statistical test and associated with the statistical test and

hypothesis (made for the decision hypothesis (made for the decision

threshold) by the following characteristics: threshold) by the following characteristics:

If in reality the true value is equal to or If in reality the true value is equal to or

exceeds the detection limit, the probability exceeds the detection limit, the probability

of wrongly not rejecting the hypothesis of wrongly not rejecting the hypothesis

(error of the second kind) shall be at most (error of the second kind) shall be at most

equal to a given value b.equal to a given value b.

σn=(2ν0)1/2

α

0 N n*

N n

β

ν n*

HP: νn≠0 (νs>ν0) σn=(2ν0)1/2 YES contribution from sample

α Kα

0,1 1,28

0,05 1,64

0,025 1,96

0,001 3,09

COUNTS EXPECTATION VALUE

STANDARD DEVIATION

BACKGROUND0N 0υ

00 υσ =SAMPLE

sN sυss υσ =

NET0NNN sn −= 0υυυ −= sn 0υυσ += sn

0

*64.4

05.0

05.0υυ

β

α=⇒

⎭⎬⎫

=

=n

02υσ =n

Page 144: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.143/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Generalization (a): Test of HypothesisGeneralization (a): Test of Hypothesis

HYPOTHESIS HHYPOTHESIS H00: No sample contribution to the count.: No sample contribution to the count.

αα:: Probability of Probability of rejectingrejecting the hypothesis Hthe hypothesis H00 when, in realty, it is truewhen, in realty, it is true

ββ:: Probability of Probability of acceptingaccepting the hypothesis Hthe hypothesis H00 when, in realty, it is falsewhen, in realty, it is false

Analogue considerations can be made in case of counting with prAnalogue considerations can be made in case of counting with preset count conditioneset count condition

H0 accepted H0 rejected

Ho true OK

P=1-αType I error

P=α

Ho false Type II error

P=βOK

P=1-β

Page 145: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.144/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Generalization (b): DefinitionsGeneralization (b): Definitions

DECISION THRESHOLD:DECISION THRESHOLD: Critical value Critical value RRnn

**of the statistical test for the decision of the statistical test for the decision between the alternative hypothesis:between the alternative hypothesis:

Α) Α) ρρss==ρρ00

Β) Β) ρρss>>ρρ00

with given probability with given probability αα of type I error:of type I error:

RRnn**=k=kαα σσnn..

DETECTION LIMIT:DETECTION LIMIT: smallest expectation smallest expectation value value ρρ00

**, associated to the statistical test , associated to the statistical test between the hypothesis A and B above, which between the hypothesis A and B above, which determines a type II error with given determines a type II error with given probability probability ββ..

ρρnn**=(k=(kαα++ kkββ))σσnn

α

0 R n*

R n

β

ρ n*

COUNTS COUNTINGTIME

COUNT RATE

EXPECTATION VALUE

STANDARD DEVIATION

BACKGROUND0N 0t 0R 0ρ 0σ

SAMPLEsN st sR sρ sσ

NET - - 0RRR sn −= 0ρρρ −= sn nσ

Page 146: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.145/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Generalization (c): Use of Generalization (c): Use of RRnn** andand ρρnn

**

RRnn** should be compared with measurement results to assess weather a should be compared with measurement results to assess weather a sample contribution has sample contribution has

been detected (been detected (aa--posterioriposteriori criteriacriteria):):

RRnn >> RRnn** sample contribution detected;sample contribution detected;

RRnn << RRnn** sample contribution not detected.sample contribution not detected.

ρρ00**should be used to check weather a measuring procedure is suitablshould be used to check weather a measuring procedure is suitable for the purpose of the e for the purpose of the

measurement. It should be compared with a specific guideline valmeasurement. It should be compared with a specific guideline value S(ue S(ββ) as specific ) as specific requirements on the sensitivity of the measuring procedure for srequirements on the sensitivity of the measuring procedure for scientific, legal or other cientific, legal or other reasons (reasons (aa--priori criteriapriori criteria):):

ρρ00 >>ρρ00** the sample contribution will be detected with probability greatethe sample contribution will be detected with probability greater than 1r than 1--ββ;;

ρρ00 <<ρρ00** the sample contribution will be detected with probability less tthe sample contribution will be detected with probability less than 1han 1--ββ..

ρρ00 <S(b)<S(b) measurement procedure is not adequate for the intended purpose.measurement procedure is not adequate for the intended purpose.

When reportingWhen reporting decision threshold and detection limits it is important to givedecision threshold and detection limits it is important to give the values of the values of ααandand ββ used.used.

All knowledge is divided into two categories: a priori and a All knowledge is divided into two categories: a priori and a posterioriposteriori knowledgeknowledge , I. Kant, , I. Kant, Critique of Pure Reason (1791).Critique of Pure Reason (1791).

Page 147: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.146/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Estimation of background repeatabilityEstimation of background repeatability

a) Assume Poisson (or other) statistics and use the a) Assume Poisson (or other) statistics and use the

uncertainty propagation law (spectrometric measurements)uncertainty propagation law (spectrometric measurements)

b) Measure the background variability if sources of b) Measure the background variability if sources of

fluctuation else than counting statistics are envisaged fluctuation else than counting statistics are envisaged

(sample treatment, counting system instability (sample treatment, counting system instability ))

Page 148: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.147/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Detection Limit and Decision Threshold: Detection Limit and Decision Threshold: BibliographyBibliography

AltschulerAltschuler B. and Pasternak B.: Health Physics 9, 293B. and Pasternak B.: Health Physics 9, 293--298 (1963)298 (1963)

Currie L.A.: Limits for qualitative detection and quantitative dCurrie L.A.: Limits for qualitative detection and quantitative determination, Anal. Chem. etermination, Anal. Chem. 40, 58640, 586--593 (1968)593 (1968)

DIN 1319DIN 1319--3, Fundamentals of metrology 3, Fundamentals of metrology Part 3 : Evaluation of measurements of a Part 3 : Evaluation of measurements of a single single measurandmeasurand, measurement uncertainty, measurement uncertainty

DIN 1319DIN 1319--4, Fundamentals of metrology 4, Fundamentals of metrology Part 4 : Evaluation of measurements, Part 4 : Evaluation of measurements, measurement uncertaintymeasurement uncertainty

DIN 25482, Limit of detection and limit of decision for nuclear DIN 25482, Limit of detection and limit of decision for nuclear radiation measurements radiation measurements Part 1Part 1--1010

HurtgenHurtgen C., Jerome S., Woods M., Revisiting Currie C., Jerome S., Woods M., Revisiting Currie how long can you go?, Appl. how long can you go?, Appl. RadiatRadiat.. IsotIsot. 53, 45. 53, 45--50 (2000)50 (2000)

Lee P.M.,: Bayesian statistics: An introduction. Oxford UniversiLee P.M.,: Bayesian statistics: An introduction. Oxford University Press, New York ty Press, New York (1989)(1989)

Nicholson W.L.: fixed time estimation of counting rates with bacNicholson W.L.: fixed time estimation of counting rates with background corrections. kground corrections. Hanford Laboratories, Richland, 1963Hanford Laboratories, Richland, 1963

Page 149: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.148/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

APPLICATION TO GAMMA APPLICATION TO GAMMA SPECTROMETRYSPECTROMETRY

Page 150: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.149/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example: Decision Threshold and Detection LimitExample: Decision Threshold and Detection Limitin gammain gamma--ray spectrometryray spectrometry

l

N2

lb: RO.I.

N1

h=FWHM

Counts Count. time

Count rate Expectation value

Standard deviation

Background0N t

0R 0υ 0σGross peak area

sN tsR sυ sσ

Net peak area

0NNN sn −= t0RRR sn −= 0υυυ −= sn nσ

22

11

)2

1()(

)2

1(

)2

1()var(

2)var(

2)(

102

4

2)(

011

*

01

*

2

0

0

0

21

210

0

<+<

++=

+=

+=

+=

+−=

≤≤

−=

−=

−−

=

l

b

l

b

t

Rkk

l

b

t

RkR

l

b

t

N

Nl

bNN

l

bNNNN

blb

channelsb

l

bNNN

NNN

bn

n

n

sn

sn

sn

n

α

α

ρ

ρ

ρ

Page 151: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.150/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

withoutwithout thresholdthreshold

Example of application ofExample of application ofa decision thresholda decision threshold

withwith thresholdthreshold

Page 152: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.151/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

WorksopWorksop onon UnderstandingUnderstanding andand EvaluatingEvaluating

RadioanalyticalRadioanalytical MeasurementMeasurement UncertaintyUncertainty

UNCERTAINTY IN GAMMA UNCERTAINTY IN GAMMA SPECTROMETRYSPECTROMETRY

1. Metrology, measurement fundamentals

2. Uncertainty evaluation theory

3. Uncertainty components in gamma spectrometry

4. Methods for uncertainty determination

5. Application, exercises, Examples, Discussion

6. Characteristic limits

7. Quality control

8. Discussion with participants

Page 153: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.152/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Objectives of Quality ControlObjectives of Quality Control

Continuous control of measurement qualityContinuous control of measurement quality

Control of measurement system characteristics Control of measurement system characteristics

(stability, drifts, etc(stability, drifts, etc ))

Possibility to start preventive actionsPossibility to start preventive actions

Page 154: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.153/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Internal Quality Control (QC)Internal Quality Control (QC)

QC at system installation (short term)QC at system installation (short term)

QC during system use (long term)QC during system use (long term)

Page 155: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.154/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

QC at system installationQC at system installation

Start a "system book Start a "system book -- log book"log book"

Follow manufacturer instructionFollow manufacturer instruction

Accurate definition of working conditions Accurate definition of working conditions

Measurement of initial system parametersMeasurement of initial system parameters

Full documentation (spectra, analysis reports, Full documentation (spectra, analysis reports, measurement results, etcmeasurement results, etc ) regard this ) regard this initial phaseinitial phase

Page 156: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.155/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Accurate definition of working Accurate definition of working conditionsconditions

oo prepre--regulationsregulations

oo application of bias voltage to detectorapplication of bias voltage to detector

oo amplifier DC amplifier DC levelelevele

oo ADC conversion gain and zeroADC conversion gain and zero

oo amplifier gainamplifier gain

oo shaping timeshaping time

oo polepole--zerozero

oo amplifier "Busy" threshold amplifier "Busy" threshold

oo ADC lower discrimination levelADC lower discrimination level

oo spectrum stabiliserspectrum stabiliser

Page 157: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.156/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Initial system performanceInitial system performance(to be compared with those quoted by manufacturer and with (to be compared with those quoted by manufacturer and with

successive measurements for long term stability studies)successive measurements for long term stability studies)

oo optimal HV (polarisation)optimal HV (polarisation)

oo energy resolution and peak shapeenergy resolution and peak shape

oo peakpeak--toto--Compton ratioCompton ratio

oo relative (to relative (to NaINaI) efficiency) efficiency

oo electronic noise equivalent energyelectronic noise equivalent energy

oo detector geometrical parametersdetector geometrical parameters

oo window and dead layer thicknesswindow and dead layer thickness

oo dead time correction accuracydead time correction accuracy

oo backgroundbackground

Page 158: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.157/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example of HV setting (1/3)Example of HV setting (1/3)HPGeHPGe (N)(N)

FWHM GMX 60min

122 keV

2,100

2,600

3,100

3,600

4,100

600 1100 1600 2100

HV (Volt)

FW

HM

(ch

.)

FWHM GMX 60min

344 keV

2,200

2,700

3,200

3,700

4,200

600 1100 1600 2100

HV (Volt)

FW

HM

(ch

.)

FWHM GMX 60min

778 keV

2,500

2,700

2,900

3,100

3,300

3,500

3,700

3,900

4,100

4,300

600 1100 1600 2100

HV (Volt)

FW

HM

(ch

.)

FWHM GMX 60min

1112 keV

2,900

3,100

3,300

3,500

3,700

3,900

4,100

4,300

4,500

600 1100 1600 2100

HV (Volt)

FW

HM

(ch

.)FWHM GMX 60min

1408 keV

3,000

3,200

3,400

3,600

3,800

4,000

4,200

4,400

4,600

600 1100 1600 2100

HV (Volt)

FW

HM

(ch

.)

FW HM G MX 60m in

40 ke V

2,30

2,50

2,70

2,90

3,10

3,30

3,50

3,70

3,90

600 1100 1600 2100

HV (V o lt)

FW

HM

(ch

.)

Page 159: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.158/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example of HV setting (2/3)Example of HV setting (2/3)HPGeHPGe (N)(N)

Rateo GMX 60min

40 keV

100,0000

105,0000

110,0000

115,0000

120,0000

125,0000

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

HV (Volt)

Co

un

t R

ate

(cp

s)

Rateo GMX 60min

122 keV

50,0000

50,5000

51,0000

51,5000

52,0000

52,5000

53,0000

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

HV (Volt)

Co

un

t R

ate

(cp

s)

Rateo GMX 60min

344 keV

15,0000

16,0000

17,0000

18,0000

19,0000

20,0000

21,0000

22,0000

23,0000

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

HV (Volt)

Co

un

t R

ate

(cp

s)

Rateo GMX 60min

778 keV

3,0000

3,5000

4,0000

4,5000

5,0000

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

HV (Volt)

Co

un

t R

ate

(cp

s)

Rateo GMX 60min

1112 keV

2,0000

2,2000

2,4000

2,6000

2,8000

3,0000

3,2000

3,4000

3,6000

3,8000

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

HV (Volt)

Co

un

t R

ate

(cp

s)

Rateo GMX 60min

1408 keV

2,5000

3,0000

3,5000

4,0000

4,5000

5,0000

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

HV (Volt)

Co

un

t R

ate

(cp

s)

Page 160: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.159/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Centroide GMX 60min

40 keV

76,00

76,20

76,40

76,60

76,80

77,00

77,20

77,40

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

HV (Volt)

Cen

tro

ide (

ch

.)

Centroide GMX 60min

122 keV

240,80

241,00

241,20

241,40

241,60

241,80

242,00

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

HV (Volt)

Cen

tro

ide (

ch

.)

Centroide GMX 60min

344 keV

684,00

684,50

685,00

685,50

686,00

686,50

687,00

687,50

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

HV (Volt)

Cen

tro

ide (

ch

.)

Centroide GMX 60min

778 keV

1552,00

1553,00

1554,00

1555,00

1556,00

1557,00

1558,00

1559,00

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

HV (Volt)

Cen

tro

ide (

ch

.)

Centroide GMX 60min

1112 keV

2217,00

2218,00

2219,00

2220,002221,00

2222,00

2223,002224,00

2225,002226,00

2227,00

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

HV (Volt)

Cen

tro

ide (

ch

.)Centroide GMX 60min

1408 keV

2808,00

2810,00

2812,00

2814,00

2816,00

2818,00

2820,00

2822,00

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

HV (Volt)

Cen

tro

ide (

ch

.)

Example of HV setting (3/3)Example of HV setting (3/3)HPGeHPGe (N)(N)

Page 161: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.160/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Energy resolution, FWHM (1)Energy resolution, FWHM (1)

For a correct measurement:For a correct measurement:

oo total count rate < 1000 stotal count rate < 1000 s--11

oo shaping time between 2 and 8 shaping time between 2 and 8 µµss

oo counts in counts in fepfep > 20000 > 20000

oo FWHM > 4 channelsFWHM > 4 channels

Page 162: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.161/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Energy resolution, FWHM (2)Energy resolution, FWHM (2)

oo The FWHM is measured in channels (The FWHM is measured in channels (chch) and converted ) and converted

inin keVkeV by the relation:by the relation:

FWHMFWHMkeVkeV == FWHMFWHMchch (E2(E2--E1)/(C2E1)/(C2--C1)C1)

where C1 and C2 are the where C1 and C2 are the centroidscentroids of the fullof the full--energyenergy--

peaks corresponding to E1 e E2 respectively.peaks corresponding to E1 e E2 respectively.

oo Photon emissions used:Photon emissions used:

CoCo--6060 E1 = 1173.2 E1 = 1173.2 keVkeV E2 = 1332.5 E2 = 1332.5 keVkeV

FeFe--5555 E1 = 5.9 E1 = 5.9 keVkeV E2 = 6.49 E2 = 6.49 keVkeV

CoCo--5757 E1 = 14.4 E1 = 14.4 keVkeV E2 = 122.1 E2 = 122.1 keVkeV

Page 163: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.162/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

PeakPeak--toto--Compton ratioCompton ratio

It is obtained from a pulse-height spectrum recorded with a

Co-60 source

The peak-to-Compton ratio, also measured in accordance with

ANSI/IEEE 325 1996, is the key indicator of a detector s

ability to distinguish low-energy peaks in the presence of high-

energy sources

The peak-to-Compton ratio is obtained by dividing the height

of the 1.33 MeV peak by the average Compton plateau

between 1.040 and 1.096 MeV

Page 164: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.163/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Efficiency relative to Efficiency relative to NaINaI,, εεrr

oo εεrr = N / T A = N / T A εεNaINaI

oo where:where:

A, activity of a CoA, activity of a Co--60 point source,60 point source,

N, number of counts in 1332 N, number of counts in 1332 keVkeV fepfep,,

distance of 25 cm from detector windowdistance of 25 cm from detector window

T, measurement timeT, measurement time

εεNaINaI = 1,2 10= 1,2 10--33..

oo A < 500 A < 500 kBqkBq (to keep pile(to keep pile--up low);up low);

oo N > 10000 (counting statistics < 1%).N > 10000 (counting statistics < 1%).

Page 165: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.164/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Noise equivalent energyNoise equivalent energy

The electronic noise, N, is a component of energy The electronic noise, N, is a component of energy

resolution.resolution.

FWHM = (NFWHM = (N22 +k E)+k E)1/21/2

N can be obtained by a measurement of the N can be obtained by a measurement of the

FWHM of a "artificial" peak generated by a FWHM of a "artificial" peak generated by a

pulserpulser..

Page 166: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.165/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Detector geometryDetector geometry

Detector geometry is required for:Detector geometry is required for:

"efficiency transfer" applications (geometry and self "efficiency transfer" applications (geometry and self absorbtionabsorbtion

corrections);corrections);

total efficiency calculation (coincidencetotal efficiency calculation (coincidence--summing corrections);summing corrections);

This information can be:This information can be:

obtained by the detector manufacturer;obtained by the detector manufacturer;

directly measured by xdirectly measured by x--ray radiography.ray radiography.

Page 167: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.166/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

XX--ray radiographies ofray radiographies ofHPGeHPGe (P) detectors(P) detectors

old detector (1970) new detector (1985)old detector (1970) new detector (1985)

Page 168: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.167/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Window and Window and GeGe dead layer thicknessdead layer thickness

o Needed for several applications

o Thickness of the materials in front of the crystal must

be given by the manufacturer

o Dead layer can be determined by a Se-75 source

Page 169: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.168/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

GeGe dead layer dead layer measurmentmeasurment

SeSe--75 x75 x--ray emissions: a) 10.5 ray emissions: a) 10.5 keVkeV, b) 1.7 , b) 1.7 keVkeV

MassicMassic attenuation coefficient for attenuation coefficient for GeGe changes drastically around changes drastically around

11.111.1 keVkeV..

Dead layer thickness, t, is obtained by the relation:Dead layer thickness, t, is obtained by the relation:

NNaa//NNbb = p= paa exp(exp(--µµaat) / t) / ppbb exp(exp(--µµbbtt), where:), where:

NNaa ee NNbb :: fepfep countscounts

ppaa = 0.498, = 0.498, ppbb = 0.076, = 0.076, µµaa = 32.5 cm= 32.5 cm22 gg--11,, µµbb = 170 cm= 170 cm22 gg--11,,

Then:Then: NNaa//NNbb = 6.55 exp(0.073 t).= 6.55 exp(0.073 t).

Page 170: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.169/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Accuracy of dead time correctionAccuracy of dead time correction

TheThe pulserpulser peak area count rate is studied as a function of peak area count rate is studied as a function of

the total count ratethe total count rate

HPGe gmx

y = -51,066x + 50,074

R2 = 1,000

y = -1,450x + 50,084

R2 = 0,958

30

35

40

45

50

55

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

Tempo morto

Rate

o n

el p

icco

dell'im

pu

lsato

re

(1/s

)corretto per tempo mortonon corretto per tempo mortoLineare (non corretto per tempo morto)Lineare (corretto per tempo morto)

Page 171: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.170/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

QC during system use (1)QC during system use (1)

oo Periodical check of system characteristicsPeriodical check of system characteristics

oo Frequency: daily, weekly o monthlyFrequency: daily, weekly o monthly

oo Needed after:Needed after:

voltage supply failurevoltage supply failure

cooling periodscooling periods

repearrepear

changes in electronicschanges in electronics

replacement of partsreplacement of parts

Page 172: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.171/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

QC during system use (2)QC during system use (2)

Main controls are:Main controls are:

oo energy resolution at different photon energies;energy resolution at different photon energies;

oo fullfull--energyenergy--peak efficiencies at different photon peak efficiencies at different photon

energies;energies;

oo fullfull--energyenergy--peak position;peak position;

oo dead time correctiondead time correction

oo total background count ratetotal background count rate

Page 173: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.172/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example of a source support for QCExample of a source support for QC

Page 174: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.173/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

SourceSource--detector geometry for QCdetector geometry for QC

Page 175: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.174/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Periodical check of FWHM and Periodical check of FWHM and fullfull--energyenergy--peak efficiencypeak efficiency

oo EuEu--152 point source152 point source

oo Energy interval: 40Energy interval: 40--14081408 keVkeV..

oo Reproducible geometryReproducible geometry

oo Analysis software routinely usedAnalysis software routinely used

oo Energy resolution and decay corrected count rates for the Energy resolution and decay corrected count rates for the

main fullmain full--energyenergy--peakspeaks

oo Use of control chartsUse of control charts

oo Importance of source stability Importance of source stability

Page 176: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.175/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example of QC (1)Example of QC (1)EuEu--152 spectrum152 spectrum

HPGeHPGe (P)(P)

SP-308 152Eu Q.A. (sp. 01011386.chn)

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

1000000

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

Energia fotonica (ke V)

Co

nte

gg

i

Real Time : 10000 s

Live Time : 9858,78 s

122245

344

779

868964 1112 1408

Page 177: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.176/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example of QCExample of QC (2)(2)Energy resolution Energy resolution HPGeHPGe (N)(N)

FWHM HPGe GM X (40 k e V )

2,0

2,2

2,4

2,6

2,8

3,0

3,2

3,4

3,6

23/0

9/9

4

01/0

1/9

5

11/0

4/9

5

20/0

7/9

5

28/1

0/9

5

05/0

2/9

6

15/0

5/9

6

23/0

8/9

6

01/1

2/9

6

11/0

3/9

7

19/0

6/9

7

27/0

9/9

7

05/0

1/9

8

15/0

4/9

8

24/0

7/9

8

01/1

1/9

8

09/0

2/9

9

20/0

5/9

9

28/0

8/9

9

06/1

2/9

9

15/0

3/0

0

23/0

6/0

0

01/1

0/0

0

09/0

1/0

1

19/0

4/0

1

Data

FW

HM

(keV

)

FWHM HPGe GM X (1112 k e V)

2,0

2,2

2,4

2,6

2,8

3,0

3,2

3,4

3,6

23/0

9/9

4

01/0

1/9

5

11/0

4/9

5

20/0

7/9

5

28/1

0/9

5

05/0

2/9

6

15/0

5/9

6

23/0

8/9

6

01/1

2/9

6

11/0

3/9

7

19/0

6/9

7

27/0

9/9

7

05/0

1/9

8

15/0

4/9

8

24/0

7/9

8

01/1

1/9

8

09/0

2/9

9

20/0

5/9

9

28/0

8/9

9

06/1

2/9

9

15/0

3/0

0

23/0

6/0

0

01/1

0/0

0

09/0

1/0

1

19/0

4/0

1

Data

FW

HM

(keV

)

Page 178: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.177/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example of QCExample of QC (3)(3)FullFull--energyenergy--peak efficiency peak efficiency HPGeHPGe (P)(P)

Q.A. COAX con Eu152 (122-245-344 Ke V )

0,300%

0,400%

0,500%

0,600%

0,700%

0,800%

0,900%

1,000%

28/1

2/9

1

06/0

4/9

2

15/0

7/9

2

23/1

0/9

2

31/0

1/9

3

11/0

5/9

3

19/0

8/9

3

27/1

1/9

3

07/0

3/9

4

15/0

6/9

4

23/0

9/9

4

01/0

1/9

5

11/0

4/9

5

20/0

7/9

5

28/1

0/9

5

05/0

2/9

6

15/0

5/9

6

23/0

8/9

6

01/1

2/9

6

11/0

3/9

7

19/0

6/9

7

27/0

9/9

7

05/0

1/9

8

15/0

4/9

8

24/0

7/9

8

01/1

1/9

8

09/0

2/9

9

20/0

5/9

9

28/0

8/9

9

06/1

2/9

9

15/0

3/0

0

23/0

6/0

0

01/1

0/0

0

09/0

1/0

1

19/0

4/0

1

Data di m is ura

Eff

icie

nza f

oto

ele

ttri

ca (

%)

Q.A. COAX Eu152 (778-964-1408 Ke V )

0,090%

0,110%

0,130%

0,150%

0,170%

0,190%

0,210%

28/1

2/9

1

06/0

4/9

2

15/0

7/9

2

23/1

0/9

2

31/0

1/9

3

11/0

5/9

3

19/0

8/9

3

27/1

1/9

3

07/0

3/9

4

15/0

6/9

4

23/0

9/9

4

01/0

1/9

5

11/0

4/9

5

20/0

7/9

5

28/1

0/9

5

05/0

2/9

6

15/0

5/9

6

23/0

8/9

6

01/1

2/9

6

11/0

3/9

7

19/0

6/9

7

27/0

9/9

7

05/0

1/9

8

15/0

4/9

8

24/0

7/9

8

01/1

1/9

8

09/0

2/9

9

20/0

5/9

9

28/0

8/9

9

06/1

2/9

9

15/0

3/0

0

23/0

6/0

0

01/1

0/0

0

09/0

1/0

1

19/0

4/0

1

Data di m is ura

Eff

icie

nza f

oto

ele

ttri

ca (

%)

Page 179: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.178/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example of QCExample of QC (4)(4)FullFull--energyenergy--peak efficiency peak efficiency HPGeHPGe (N)(N)

Q.A. GMX con Eu152 (122-245-344 KeV)

0,350%

0,450%

0,550%

0,650%

0,750%

0,850%

0,950%

1,050%

28/1

2/91

06/0

4/92

15/0

7/92

23/1

0/92

31/0

1/93

11/0

5/93

19/0

8/93

27/1

1/93

07/0

3/94

15/0

6/94

23/0

9/94

01/0

1/95

11/0

4/95

20/0

7/95

28/1

0/95

05/0

2/96

15/0

5/96

23/0

8/96

01/1

2/96

11/0

3/97

19/0

6/97

27/0

9/97

05/0

1/98

15/0

4/98

24/0

7/98

01/1

1/98

09/0

2/99

20/0

5/99

28/0

8/99

06/1

2/99

15/0

3/00

23/0

6/00

01/1

0/00

09/0

1/01

19/0

4/01

Data di misura

Eff

icie

nza

foto

elet

tric

a (%

)

Q.A. GMX Eu152 (778-964-1408 KeV)

0,090%

0,110%

0,130%

0,150%

0,170%

0,190%

0,210%

28/1

2/91

06/0

4/92

15/0

7/92

23/1

0/92

31/0

1/93

11/0

5/93

19/0

8/93

27/1

1/93

07/0

3/94

15/0

6/94

23/0

9/94

01/0

1/95

11/0

4/95

20/0

7/95

28/1

0/95

05/0

2/96

15/0

5/96

23/0

8/96

01/1

2/96

11/0

3/97

19/0

6/97

27/0

9/97

05/0

1/98

15/0

4/98

24/0

7/98

01/1

1/98

09/0

2/99

20/0

5/99

28/0

8/99

06/1

2/99

15/0

3/00

23/0

6/00

01/1

0/00

09/0

1/01

19/0

4/01

Data di misura

Eff

icie

nza

foto

elet

tric

a (%

)

Page 180: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.179/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example of QCExample of QC (5)(5)FullFull--energyenergy--peak efficiency peak efficiency HPGeHPGe (N) 40 (N) 40 keVkeV

Q.A. GMX con Eu152 (39.9 KeV)

y = -7,13E-07x + 3,59E-02

0,950%

1,000%

1,050%

1,100%

1,150%

1,200%

1,250%15/0

6/9

4

14/0

8/9

4

13/1

0/9

4

12/1

2/9

4

10/0

2/9

5

11/0

4/9

5

10/0

6/9

5

09/0

8/9

5

08/1

0/9

5

07/1

2/9

5

05/0

2/9

6

05/0

4/9

6

04/0

6/9

6

03/0

8/9

6

02/1

0/9

6

01/1

2/9

6

30/0

1/9

7

31/0

3/9

7

30/0

5/9

7

29/0

7/9

7

27/0

9/9

7

26/1

1/9

7

25/0

1/9

8

26/0

3/9

8

25/0

5/9

8

24/0

7/9

8

22/0

9/9

8

21/1

1/9

8

20/0

1/9

9

21/0

3/9

9

20/0

5/9

9

19/0

7/9

9

17/0

9/9

9

16/1

1/9

9

15/0

1/0

0

15/0

3/0

0

14/0

5/0

0

13/0

7/0

0

11/0

9/0

0

10/1

1/0

0

09/0

1/0

1

10/0

3/0

1

Data di misura

Eff

icie

nza f

oto

ele

ttri

ca (

%)

Page 181: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.180/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example of QCExample of QC (6)(6)Dead time Dead time HPGeHPGe (P)(P)

0

2

4

6

8

10

1228/1

2/9

1

06/0

4/9

2

15/0

7/9

2

23/1

0/9

2

31/0

1/9

3

11/0

5/9

3

19/0

8/9

3

27/1

1/9

3

07/0

3/9

4

15/0

6/9

4

23/0

9/9

4

01/0

1/9

5

11/0

4/9

5

20/0

7/9

5

28/1

0/9

5

05/0

2/9

6

15/0

5/9

6

23/0

8/9

6

01/1

2/9

6

11/0

3/9

7

19/0

6/9

7

27/0

9/9

7

05/0

1/9

8

15/0

4/9

8

24/0

7/9

8

01/1

1/9

8

09/0

2/9

9

20/0

5/9

9

28/0

8/9

9

06/1

2/9

9

15/0

3/0

0

23/0

6/0

0

01/1

0/0

0

09/0

1/0

1

19/0

4/0

1

Data di misura

Dead

tim

e (

%)

Page 182: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.181/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example of QCExample of QC (7)(7)Live Time Live Time HPGeHPGe (N)(N)

LIVE TIME GMX

9100

9200

9300

9400

9500

9600

9700

9800

990012/1

2/9

4

10/0

2/9

5

11/0

4/9

5

10/0

6/9

5

09/0

8/9

5

08/1

0/9

5

07/1

2/9

5

05/0

2/9

605/0

4/9

6

04/0

6/9

603/0

8/9

6

02/1

0/9

601/1

2/9

6

30/0

1/9

731/0

3/9

7

30/0

5/9

7

29/0

7/9

7

27/0

9/9

7

26/1

1/9

7

25/0

1/9

8

26/0

3/9

8

25/0

5/9

8

24/0

7/9

8

22/0

9/9

8

21/1

1/9

8

20/0

1/9

921/0

3/9

9

20/0

5/9

919/0

7/9

9

17/0

9/9

916/1

1/9

9

15/0

1/0

015/0

3/0

0

14/0

5/0

0

13/0

7/0

0

11/0

9/0

0

10/1

1/0

0

09/0

1/0

1

10/0

3/0

1

Data

Liv

e T

ime (

s)

Page 183: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.182/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Background control (1)Background control (1)

ooBackground must be checked after installation and Background must be checked after installation and periodicallyperiodically

ooPossible causes for changes in background:Possible causes for changes in background: contamination of detector or shielding contamination of detector or shielding

changes of indoor gamma backgroundchanges of indoor gamma background

changes in human presence in roomchanges in human presence in room

changes in air ventilationchanges in air ventilation

radioactive sources in proximity of detectorradioactive sources in proximity of detector

electronic noiseelectronic noise

Page 184: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.183/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Background control (2)Background control (2)

Background control particularly needed for Background control particularly needed for

lowlow--level measurementslevel measurements

Control of total count rate (threshold at Control of total count rate (threshold at ≅≅ 2020

keVkeV))

Spectrometry for deeper investigationSpectrometry for deeper investigation

Page 185: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.184/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example of QCExample of QC (8)(8)Background spectrum Background spectrum HPGeHPGe (P)(P)

186

238-241

295

351

583

609

661

47

26141764

1588

1120 1461

Page 186: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.185/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example of QCExample of QC (9)(9)BackgroundBackground fepfep HPGeHPGe (P)(P)

FONDO HPGe COAX, pozzetto vuoto: RADIONUCLIDI NATURALI

0,000

0,001

0,002

0,003

0,004

0,005

0,006

0,007

0,008

0,009

0,010

0,011238,6

3

212P

b

241,5

0

214P

b

295,2

1

214P

b

351,5

0

214P

b

583,1

9

208T

l

609,3

2

214B

i

911,0

7

228A

c

968,9

0

228A

c

1120,2

9

214B

i

1587,9

0

228A

c

1764,5

2

214B

i

2614,6

0

208T

l

ENERGIA (keV)

Co

ntr

ibu

to d

el fo

nd

o (

cp

s)

Page 187: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.186/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Example of QC (10)Example of QC (10)HPGeHPGe (P)(P)

Count rates of the main fullCount rates of the main full--energyenergy--peaks observed in the peaks observed in the

background spectrumbackground spectrum

Radionuclide Energy(keV)

Average count rate

(1/s)

Std.unc.(%)

212Pb 238.6 0.00395 15%

214Pb 241.5 0.00161 49%

214Pb 295.2 0.00321 46%

214Pb 351.5 0.00524 43%

208Tl 583.2 0.00131 12%

214Bi 609.3 0.00376 47%

228Ac 911.1 0.00089 14%

228Ac 968.9 0.00055 17%

214Bi 1120.3 0.00089 31%

228Ac 1587.9 0.00011 44%

214Bi 1764.5 0.00117 25%

208Tl 2614.6 0.00265 10%

Page 188: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.187/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Proficiency test and Quality AssuranceProficiency test and Quality AssuranceExample: the Italian QA Example: the Italian QA programmeprogramme

The main Quality Assurance program conducted by ENEAThe main Quality Assurance program conducted by ENEA--INMRI in the field INMRI in the field

of radioactivity measurements regarded the national network for of radioactivity measurements regarded the national network for environmentalenvironmental

radioactivity surveillance. radioactivity surveillance.

The program is based on periodical calibration and intercomparisThe program is based on periodical calibration and intercomparison campaigns on campaigns

carried out by ENEAcarried out by ENEA--INMRI under request of the National Agency for INMRI under request of the National Agency for

Environmental Protection. This program started more than 15 yearEnvironmental Protection. This program started more than 15 years ago. Beta s ago. Beta

counting and gcounting and g--ray spectrometry in environmental samples are the main ray spectrometry in environmental samples are the main

objects of the program. objects of the program.

This QA program was effective in reducing to about 10% the maximThis QA program was effective in reducing to about 10% the maximumum

deviation of the results among the network laboratories. A new ndeviation of the results among the network laboratories. A new nationalational

intercomparison campaign was carried out for gintercomparison campaign was carried out for g--ray spectrometry ray spectrometry

measurements on spiked simulated filters. To this purpose about measurements on spiked simulated filters. To this purpose about 60 sources 60 sources

were prepared and distributed to the participating laboratories.were prepared and distributed to the participating laboratories. Results of the Results of the

intercomparison are under evaluation by the ENEAintercomparison are under evaluation by the ENEA--INMRI.INMRI.

Page 189: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.188/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

PreparationPreparation of standard of standard sourcessources forfor thethe nationalnationalradioactivityradioactivity surveillancesurveillance network 2004network 2004--20052005intercomparisonintercomparison

MRL-1837

n° 80 sorgenti su disco n° 2 sorgenti su disco n° 3 sorgenti su disco (geom. filtro) (geom. filtro) (geom. puntiforme)depositate per volumetria depositate per gravimetria depositate per gravimetria

SP-1922

SF-1838

SF-1917

SF-1919

..

Co-57 Eu-152 Cs-134 Cs-137 Co-60(# 1116) (# 1503) (# 201) (# 40)

HCl 1N +carriers

SF-1918

SP-1920

(# 1574)

SP-1921

MIX

Page 190: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.189/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Quality SystemsQuality Systems

Page 191: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.190/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

MAIN TOPICS OF AMAIN TOPICS OF A

QUALITY MANUAL QUALITY MANUAL

Quality PolicyQuality Policy

ResponsibilitiesResponsibilities

Modalities to manage the QS (general procedures and Modalities to manage the QS (general procedures and

criteria)criteria)

RecordsRecords

Page 192: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.191/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Outline of a typical Quality System Outline of a typical Quality System

with reference to the following elements of the QMwith reference to the following elements of the QM

1.1. DocumentDocument controlcontrol (# 4.3, ISO IEC EN 17025)(# 4.3, ISO IEC EN 17025)

2.2. ReviewReview of of requestrequest,, tenderstenders andand contractcontract (# 4.4, ISO IEC EN 17025)(# 4.4, ISO IEC EN 17025)

3.3. SubcontractingSubcontracting (# 4.5, ISO IEC EN 17025)(# 4.5, ISO IEC EN 17025)

4.4. ServiceService toto the clientthe client (# 4.7, ISO IEC EN 17025)(# 4.7, ISO IEC EN 17025)

5.5. CorrectiveCorrective actionaction (# 4.10, ISO IEC EN 17025)(# 4.10, ISO IEC EN 17025)

6.6. AuditAudit (# 4.13, ISO IEC EN 17025)(# 4.13, ISO IEC EN 17025)

7.7. ManagementManagement reviewreview (# 4.14, ISO IEC EN 17025)(# 4.14, ISO IEC EN 17025)

8.8. Test and Test and calibrationcalibration methodmethod -- methodmethod validationvalidation (# 5.4, ISO IEC EN 17025) (# 5.4, ISO IEC EN 17025)

9.9. EquipmentEquipment (# 5.5, ISO IEC EN 17025)(# 5.5, ISO IEC EN 17025)

10.10. AssuringAssuring thethe qualityquality of test and of test and calibrationcalibration resultsresults (# 5.9, ISO IEC EN 17025)(# 5.9, ISO IEC EN 17025)

Page 193: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.192/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

WorksopWorksop onon UnderstandingUnderstanding andand EvaluatingEvaluating

RadioanalyticalRadioanalytical MeasurementMeasurement UncertaintyUncertainty

UNCERTAINTY IN GAMMA UNCERTAINTY IN GAMMA SPECTROMETRYSPECTROMETRY

1. Metrology, measurement fundamentals

2. Uncertainty evaluation theory

3. Uncertainty components in gamma spectrometry

4. Methods for uncertainty determination

5. Application, exercises, Examples, Discussion

6. Characteristic limits

7. Quality control

8. Discussion with participants

Page 194: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.193/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

TRACEABILITYTRACEABILITY

Page 195: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.194/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

TRACEABILITY: definitionTRACEABILITY: definition[Ref. BIPM/ISO International Vocabulary of[Ref. BIPM/ISO International Vocabulary of

basic and general terms in metrology]basic and general terms in metrology]

TRACEABILITY:TRACEABILITY: property of the result of a

measurement or the value of a standard whereby it

can be related to stated references, usually national

or international standards, through an unbroken

chain (traceability chain) of comparisons all

having stated uncertainties.

Page 196: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.195/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Standards: DefinitionsStandards: Definitions[BIPM/ISO International Vocabulary[BIPM/ISO International Vocabulary

of basic and general terms in metrology]of basic and general terms in metrology]

MEASUREMENT STANDARDMEASUREMENT STANDARD: material measure, measuring instrument, reference material or : material measure, measuring instrument, reference material or measuring measuring instrument intended to define, realise, conserve or reproduce a instrument intended to define, realise, conserve or reproduce a unit or one or more values of a quantity to serve unit or one or more values of a quantity to serve as a reference.as a reference.

INTERNATIONAL STANDARDINTERNATIONAL STANDARD: standard recognised by an international agreement to serve int: standard recognised by an international agreement to serve internationally ernationally as the basis for assigning values to other standards of the quanas the basis for assigning values to other standards of the quantity concerned.tity concerned.

NATIONAL STANDARDNATIONAL STANDARD: standard recognised by a national decision to serve, in a coun: standard recognised by a national decision to serve, in a country, as the basis for try, as the basis for assigning values to other standards of the quantity concerned.assigning values to other standards of the quantity concerned.

PRIMARY STANDARDPRIMARY STANDARD: standard that is designated or widely acknowledged as having t: standard that is designated or widely acknowledged as having the highest he highest metrological qualities and whose value is accepted without refermetrological qualities and whose value is accepted without reference to other standards of the same quantity.ence to other standards of the same quantity.

SECONDARY STANDARDSECONDARY STANDARD: standard whose value is assigned by comparison with a primary : standard whose value is assigned by comparison with a primary standard of the standard of the same quantity.same quantity.

REFERENCE STANDARDREFERENCE STANDARD: standard, generally having the highest metrological quality av: standard, generally having the highest metrological quality available at a given ailable at a given location or in a given organisation, from which measurements madlocation or in a given organisation, from which measurements made there are derived.e there are derived.

WORKING STANDARDWORKING STANDARD: standard that is used routinely to calibrate or check material: standard that is used routinely to calibrate or check material measures, measuring measures, measuring instruments or reference materials.instruments or reference materials.

TRANSFER STANDARDTRANSFER STANDARD: standard used as an intermediary to compare standards.: standard used as an intermediary to compare standards.

TRAVELLING STANDARDTRAVELLING STANDARD: standard, sometimes of special construction, intended for tran: standard, sometimes of special construction, intended for transport between sport between different locations.different locations.

Page 197: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.196/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Reference Materials: definitionsReference Materials: definitions[Ref. BIPM/ISO International Vocabulary of[Ref. BIPM/ISO International Vocabulary of

basic and general terms in metrology]basic and general terms in metrology]

REFERENCE MATERIALREFERENCE MATERIAL: material or substance one or more : material or substance one or more of whose property values are sufficiently homogeneous and of whose property values are sufficiently homogeneous and well established to be used for the Calibration of an apparatus,well established to be used for the Calibration of an apparatus,the assessment of a measurement method, or for assigning the assessment of a measurement method, or for assigning values to materials.values to materials.

CERTIFIED REFERENCE MATERIALSCERTIFIED REFERENCE MATERIALS: reference material, : reference material, accompanied by a certificate, one or more of whose property accompanied by a certificate, one or more of whose property values are certified by a procedure which establishes values are certified by a procedure which establishes traceability to an accurate realisation of the unit in which thetraceability to an accurate realisation of the unit in which theproperty values are expressed, and for which each certified property values are expressed, and for which each certified value is accompanied by an uncertainty at a stated level of value is accompanied by an uncertainty at a stated level of confidence.confidence.

Page 198: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.197/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

The role of standardsThe role of standards[Ref. NCRP][Ref. NCRP]

The primary role of any standard is to enable the result of The primary role of any standard is to enable the result of a measurement to be communicated as a quantity, in a measurement to be communicated as a quantity, in terms of a number and a unit, to users or to other workers terms of a number and a unit, to users or to other workers in a field.in a field.

The standard must be accompanied by a certificate giving The standard must be accompanied by a certificate giving the value of the quantity concerned to within stated limits the value of the quantity concerned to within stated limits of uncertainty and characterising all other important of uncertainty and characterising all other important parameters, for example, chemical composition, ambient parameters, for example, chemical composition, ambient conditions...conditions...

Such standards can then be used to calibrate instruments Such standards can then be used to calibrate instruments in order to use these instruments to quantify the value of in order to use these instruments to quantify the value of the physical quantity concerned in suitable measuring the physical quantity concerned in suitable measuring conditions.conditions.

Page 199: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.198/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

InternationalInternationaltraceability andtraceability andthe role of the role of standardsstandards

national standards

BIPM

primary standard

sources

nationalinstitutes

4 πβ−γ coinc.count.

4π count.sum peak

coinc. countRn-222 std

nationalinstitutes

transfer standards

well ion

chamb.

coax

HPGewell

NaI

well

HPGe

standard sources

secondary standard sources

users

prop.count. HPGe NaI

liquid scint. count.

The figure illustrates how the The figure illustrates how the national and international measuring national and international measuring systems can be envisaged as being systems can be envisaged as being traceable to and consistent with each traceable to and consistent with each other. The National Metrology other. The National Metrology Institutes (NMI) maintain traceability Institutes (NMI) maintain traceability links to the Bureau International des links to the Bureau International des PoidsPoids etet MesuresMesures (BIPM) and with (BIPM) and with each other, while each of the national each other, while each of the national laboratories will presumably seek to laboratories will presumably seek to maintain traceability with other maintain traceability with other measurement laboratories in its own measurement laboratories in its own jurisdiction.jurisdiction.

Page 200: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.199/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

International traceability andInternational traceability andequivalence are established by:equivalence are established by:

International comparisons:International comparisons:

oo organised by the organised by the Bureau International des Bureau International des PoidsPoids etet MesuresMesures(BIPM)(BIPM)

oo International reference system (SIRInternational reference system (SIR--BIPM)BIPM)

oo Regional Metrology Organisations (EUROMET,Regional Metrology Organisations (EUROMET, ))

Bilateral comparisons between Bilateral comparisons between NMINMI ss

Page 201: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.200/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

The Bureau The Bureau International des International des PoidsPoids etet MesuresMesures(BIPM)(BIPM)

[http://[http://www.bipm.orgwww.bipm.org]]

The task of the BIPMThe task of the BIPM is to ensure is to ensure worldworld--wide uniformity of wide uniformity of measurements and their traceability to measurements and their traceability to the International System of Units (SI).the International System of Units (SI).

It does this with the authority of the It does this with the authority of the Convention of the MetreConvention of the Metre, a diplomatic , a diplomatic treaty between fiftytreaty between fifty--one nations, and one nations, and it operates through a series of it operates through a series of Consultative Committees, whose Consultative Committees, whose members are the members are the national metrology national metrology laboratorieslaboratories of the Member States of of the Member States of the Convention, and through its own the Convention, and through its own laboratory work.laboratory work.

The BIPM carries out The BIPM carries out measurementmeasurement--related researchrelated research. It takes part in, and . It takes part in, and organizes, international comparisons organizes, international comparisons of national measurement standards, of national measurement standards, and it carries out calibrations for and it carries out calibrations for Member States. Member States.

Page 202: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.201/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

TheThe MutualMutualRecognitionRecognitionArrangementArrangement(MRA)(MRA)

[http://www.bipm.org]

The MRAThe MRA was drawn up by the International Committee of was drawn up by the International Committee of Weights and Measures (CIPM), under the authority given to it Weights and Measures (CIPM), under the authority given to it in the Metre Convention, for signature by directors of the in the Metre Convention, for signature by directors of the NMIsNMIsof Member States of the Convention and Associates of the of Member States of the Convention and Associates of the CGPM. CGPM.

ObjectivesObjectives

oo to establish the degree of equivalence of national to establish the degree of equivalence of national measurement standards maintained by measurement standards maintained by NMIsNMIs;;

oo to provide for the mutual recognition of calibration and to provide for the mutual recognition of calibration and measurement certificates issued by measurement certificates issued by NMIsNMIs;;

oo thereby to provide governments and other parties with a thereby to provide governments and other parties with a secure technical foundation for wider agreements related to secure technical foundation for wider agreements related to international trade, commerce and regulatory affairs.international trade, commerce and regulatory affairs.

ProcessProcess

oo international comparisons of measurements, to be known as international comparisons of measurements, to be known as key comparisons;key comparisons;

oo supplementary international comparisons of measurements;supplementary international comparisons of measurements;

oo quality systems and demonstrations of competence by quality systems and demonstrations of competence by NMIsNMIs..

OutcomeOutcome: : statementsstatements of the of the measurementmeasurement capabilitiescapabilities ofof eacheachNMI in a database NMI in a database maintainedmaintained byby the BIPM and the BIPM and publiclypubliclyavailableavailable on the Web.on the Web.

Page 203: 1833-51 Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating ...indico.ictp.it/event/a06186/session/54/contribution/35/material/0/0.pdf · Worksop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical

N.202/78P. De Felice Uncertainty in gamma spectrometry

Thank youThank you