16. david whitehead wet living lake nov17 · benefit to new zealand ... sam carrick tim clough...

7
10/11/2017 1 Reducing nitrogen losses from farms November 17 TITLE GOES HERE PAGE 1 David Whitehead and colleagues November 17 MANAAKI WHENUA – LANDCARE RESEARCH PAGE 2 New practical options are available to farmers to reduce nitrogen losses draining into groundwater and from gaseous emissions beyond current best practices by integrating fodder crops to manage carbon inputs to the soil

Upload: trinhngoc

Post on 08-Jul-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

10/11/2017

1

Reducing nitrogen losses from farms

No

vem

ber

17

TITL

E G

OES

HER

EP

AG

E 1

David Whitehead and colleagues

No

vem

ber

17

MA

NA

AK

I W

HEN

UA

–LA

ND

CA

RE

RES

EAR

CH

PA

GE

2

New practical options are available to farmers to reduce nitrogen losses draining into groundwater and from gaseous emissions beyond current best practices by integrating fodder crops to manage carbon inputs to the soil

10/11/2017

2

Balmoral stony soilsCoarse fraction (> 2 mm)0.2 m depth 30–50%> 0.5 m depth 60–70%

Ashley Dene Research & Development Station

Reducing nitrogen losses from farms

National issue• Widespread conversion to intensive farming practices• Sensitive soils prone to nitrogen leaching, new regulations• Reducing agricultural greenhouse gas emissions• Solutions to manage tensions between increasing productivity, minimising

environmental impact, and exercising kaitiakitanga

Benefit to New Zealand• Hurunui: best practice could result in 17% decrease in nitrogen losses, allow

extra 6 680 ha conversion, increase value from milk exports up to $56 million/year

• Improve by additional 10% across Canterbury would allow headroom for 10 470 ha equivalent, with increase in value from milk exports up to $122 million/year

• Environmental, social, enhanced kaitiakitanga benefits

10/11/2017

3

Hypotheses• cycling of carbon and nitrogen in stony pastoral soils regulated by carbon inputs• nitrogen losses coupled to nitrogen immobilisation and denitrification • manipulation of carbon inputs will increase immobilisation and denitrification and decreases nitrogen losses

nitrogen leaching

soil microbial processescarbon cycling

immobilisation, denitrification

nitrous oxide emissions

carbon inputs• biomass• litter decomposition• root exudates• urine composition• dung

nitrogen inputs• fertiliser• urine• dung

Manipulating carbon inputs• crop type: ryegrass/clover ― lucerne ― kale ― fodder beet ― plantain• rate of biomass production: irrigation• urine composition 

Molecular techniques• identify functional diversity• couple with biological drivers regulating leaching and gaseous losses 

Leaching losses of nitrogen and carbon

10/11/2017

4

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

No Carbon input Sucrose rate 1  (12 t/ha)

Nitrogen le

ached (kg N/ha)

Carbon application rate

NH4‐N

NO3‐N

MinN

Carbon input reduced nitrogen leaching by 41% under lucerne

No carbon input Carbon input 12 Mg/ha

Lucerne

William Talbot

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

FB RG/WC FB RG/WC

Nitrogen leached (kg N/ha)

Urine

NH4‐N

NO3‐N

Mineral N

FB soil/crop                                         RG/WC soil/crop

Nitrogen losses greater under fodder beet soil than under ryegrass/clover For fodder beet soil, fodder beet urine leached 16.6% less nitrogen than with ryegrass/clover urineFor ryegrass/clover soil, fodder beet urine leached 49.2% less nitrogen than with ryegrass/clover urine

Fodder beet – ryegrass/clover

Fodder beet soil Ryegrass/clover soil

Fodder beet Ryegrass/clover Fodder beet Ryegrass/clover

William Talbot

10/11/2017

5

Paddock scale carbon, nitrogen, water inputs and losses

irrigated lucerne

dryland lucerne

lysimeters

paddock scale sites

0 200 m

Startirrigated

2017

Startdryland

Startlysimeters

Cumulative net carbon balance 2 years

Cum

ulat

ive

carb

on b

alan

ce M

g ha

-1

10/11/2017

6

No

vem

ber

17

MA

NA

AK

I W

HEN

UA

–LA

ND

CA

RE

RES

EAR

CH

PA

GE

11

Dai

ly ra

in +

irrig

Cum

dra

inag

e

Cum

NO

3–N

C

um to

tal c

arbo

nm

m

m

mkg

ha-1

kg h

a-1IrrigatedDryland

Effluent irrigationRainfall

11290

29

2

354294

47690

6 Apr 6 May 6 Jun 6 Jul 6 Aug 6 Sep 6 Oct

What’s going on below ground?

10/11/2017

7

No

vem

ber

17

MA

NA

AK

I W

HEN

UA

–LA

ND

CA

RE

RES

EAR

CH

PA

GE

13

• Conversion from dryland to intensive irrigated dairy farming is widespread on shallow, stony soils

• Leaching losses are unlikely in summer. Winter leaching losses respond rapidly to major rainfall events

• Nitrogen leaching losses from lucerne are attributed mainly to effluent applications

• Leaching losses can be reduced by manipulation of crop types and carbon inputs

• Investigation of microbiological processes will identify improved management practices

[email protected]

With thanks to our collaboratorsGwen Grelet Keith Cameron Brendon MalcolmJohn Hunt Hong Di Jo SharpPaul Mudge Grant EdwardsJonathan Nuñez William Talbot Steve WakelinJohannes Laubach Nik LehtoGraeme Rogers Hirini MatungaSam Carrick Tim CloughAndré Eger Yuan LiScott GrahamCarina DavisEva WeberRowan BuxtonJohn Payne