15 january 2014

1United States Fleet Forces United States Pacific Fleet

15 January 2014

Optimizing The Fleet Response Plan

ADM Bill Gortney


Assess

EndsWays

RESOURCE/ POLICY

ACCESS /PROCURE

PRE-INTRO

BASIC INTEGRATEDMAINT DEPLOY &SUSTAIN

FRTP

Surface

Aviation

Submarines

C4ISR/CYBER

NECC

Wea

pon

Syst

em

OP/TAC HQs

Everyone is part of the Readiness Kill Chain

Everyone needs to know their place and role in the Readiness Kill Chain

Means and Ways must support the Ends – our Deployability / Sustainment model, the FRP

Common Actions

Synchronized Training

Full Weapon System Ops

Means•Personnel•Equipment •Supplies •Training•Ordnance•Networks

• Installations•Community• Industry•Elected Leaders

Governance / C2 – Drives integration & synchronization vertically across weapons systems & horizontally across the readiness lifecycle

As of 08MAY13

Readiness Kill ChainPast, Present, Way Ahead

2


• The Readiness Kill Chain (RKC) is a way to break down institutional barriers, increase understanding of readiness production, ensure a common understanding of Navy readiness on the same page, and ensure that policies, resources, and products deliver the right capability and readiness for mission requirements.

• Specifically, RKC is a repeatable methodology to identify readiness production barriers and root causes, followed by development of effective strategies and solutions to remove these barriers. These processes result in complete assessment and presentation for decisions used to improve forward deployed readiness and resolve barriers in an informed and cost effective manner.

• O-FRP is one example of implementation of the RKC. O-FRP uses the RKC approach to analyze various stages of the processes for training, inspections, parts, maintenance and manning to achieve desired end states.

What is RKC?


“We will deliver credible capability for deterrence,

sea control, and power projection to deter or

contain conflict and fight and win wars.”

“Operate forward at strategic maritime

crossroads; Sustain our fleet capability through

effective maintenance, timely modernization, and

sustained production of proven ships and

aircraft.”

.“We must ensure today’s force is ready for its

assigned missions. Maintaining ships and aircraft

to their expected service lives is an essential

contribution to fleet capacity”

WARFIGHTIN

G

FIRST

OPERATE

FORWARD

BE

READYWe will operationalize

the Sailing Directions

through the Optimized

Fleet Response Plan

using the Readiness

Kill Chain (RKC)

CNO Guidance

“We developed the Optimized Fleet Response Plan to

establish a more manning-balanced and sustainable

cycle…”

- CNO Position Report: 2013, p 3


• The CNO’s tenets as outlined in his Sailing directions and reinforced in the Navigation Plan are clear.

• The Readiness Kill Chain approach provides us a holistic construct, or methodology, to ensure the Fleet is focused on warfighting … forward … and ready to conduct missions assigned and O-FRP is the answer to how we balance those priorities.

CNO’s Tenets


• The Optimized Fleet Response Plan (O-FRP) has been developed to enhance the stability and predictability for our Sailors and families by aligning carrier strike group assets to a new 36 month training and deployment cycle.

• Beginning in fiscal year ’15, all required maintenance, training, evaluations and a single eight-month deployment will be efficiently scheduled throughout the cycle in such a manner to drive down costs and increase overall fleet readiness.

• Under this plan, we will streamline the inspection and evaluation process and ensure that we are able to maintain a level of surge capacity.

• O-FRP reduces time at sea and increases home port tempo from 49% to 68% for our Sailors over the 36 month period. Initially focused on Carrier Strike Groups, O-FRP will ultimately be designed for all U.S Navy assets from the ARG/MEU to submarines and expeditionary forces.

What is O-FRP?


Fleet Response PlanProblem Statement

• We have lost predictability

• For Sailors, families, industrial base

• Readiness producers, and readiness consumers

• Length does not accommodate maintenance and training … or maximize operational availability

• Misaligned CSG / DESRON Chains of Command

• Manning levels not aligned to the phases of FRP

• Maintenance and modernization

• Not executing on time / budget

• Requires better synchronization

• Underfunded spares accounts

• Unconstrained inspection process

• Lack of standardized Operational /Tactical HQ academic, synthetic, and live training


Potential Drivers to Readiness Production

C3

C5

C2

C4

IKE CSGFEB11 – SEP13

C3

C5

C2

C4

HST CSGJUL10 – SEP13

Model Readiness Actual profile Anticipated profile

“Cost Driver” – Maintenance Driven FRP Inefficiency

“Cost Driver” – Schedule Driven FRP Inefficiency

C3

C5

C2

C4

NIM CSGFEB11 – SEP13

“Cost Driver” – Maintenance and Schedule Driven FRP Inefficiency

Traditional Fleet FRP


• The previous slide graphically depicts inefficiencies.• The solid blue line represents our readiness model and the dashed line is

reality for these three Strike Groups.• Each of these three profiles is unique and our generic profile is not reliably

predictive of the investment of our “means and ways” in this process.• IKE CSG faced maintenance challenges which delayed her work-ups and

deployment and then she conducted a second deployment after a short homeport visit.

• HST CSG trained up and then delayed due to a change in presence requirements – we “banked” her readiness during this delay.

• NIM CSG was a combination of both maintenance and schedule delays.• Comparing a generic planning FRP profile to these CSGs profiles highlights

the need to find a model that is more predictable and reliable in the planning process and ensures that we conserve scarce resources and money.

• O-FRP establishes a framework to develop a predictive model that will drive each CSG to look and execute a more similar FRP profile.

Understanding Potential Drivers toReadiness Production Slide


• DepSecDef-driven concept to generate 3.0-4.0 CSG Ao

– 7-7-7 plan (Deploy/Dwell/Deploy)– 49 percent Homeport Time– Deployments are 39 percent of the FRP length– ECP Frame work:

• Provides a predictable FRP cycle• Extends/synchs CVN/CVW/SC FRP cycles to 36 months• Fixes CSG composition: Ships/aircraft/staffs remain aligned thru entire FRP cycle• Generates fully ready forces, trained to a single MCO certification standard• Establishes a stable and predictable maintenance plan• Maintenance interval remains constant

– ECP concept ended Jan 13 due to sequester/POM fiscal limits

O-FRP Predecessor:Enhanced Carrier Presence


• The following series of slides describe progress achieved in our effort to manage Fleet wholeness across the Readiness Kill Chain (RKC) through the Optimized-Fleet Response Plan (O-FRP).

• “Managed Wholeness,” is a term USFF coined to describe how we are leading our forces through the tough fiscal turbulence expected over the coming years.

“Managed Wholeness”


• We’ve started FY 14 under a Continuing Resolution Amendment at reduced funding levels. Additionally, we are constrained by our current manpower levels and force structure. As a result, we have to carefully manage the wholeness of the Fleet with innovative cost saving measures that optimize readiness at the reduced funding levels.

Current Fiscal Environment


• Retains ECP framework / capacity with reduced global Ao (~2.0)– 36 month FRP

– Single 8-month deployment

– Starts with HST CSG in Nov 2014

• Enables delivery of:– Fixed CSG Composition

– Aligned and stabilized CSG manning throughout the FRP

– Stable maintenance plan

– Improved quality of work and enhanced quality of life

– Embedded Electromagnetic Spectrum Maneuver Warfare and Naval Integrated Fire Control – Counter Air

– Forces trained to a single certification standard

Optimized Fleet Response Plan (O-FRP)


Optimized FRPLines of Effort

Lin

es o

f E

ffo

rt

Advanced Training

(USFF / CPF N7)

Maintenance/Modernization

(NAVSEA / NAVAIR USFF / CPF )

Manning/Individual Training(OPNAV N1 /USFF)

CSG Alignment

(USFF / CPF N3)

FRP Length(USFF / CPF OPNAV N3)

Unit Training(TYCOMs)

Inspections(USFF/CPF N43)

Operational & Tactical HQ’s

(USFF / CPF N7)

Parts(USFF / CPF N41OPNAV N8/N9)


FRP Length

• Maximum CSG Operational Availability (Ao)– 36 month FRP

– Supply-based; surge capacity dependent upon funding

– Maximum forward presence with available capacity and funding

– Predictable, yet adaptable

– Able to meet FY14-16 with 2.0 CVN and 27 SC (includes 9+4 FDNF)

For the sunk cost of maintenance & training, maximize Ao, with a clean chain of command, and an acceptable PERSTEMPO

ECP O-FRP

Length 7 / 7 / 7 8

Homeport Tempo

0.49 0.68

D / FRP 0.39 0.22

PREDICTABLE

ADAPTABLE


What is AO?

• AO is “Operational Availability.” Basically, this is the time a platform is employable.

– This does not take into consideration OPTEMPO and PERSTEMPO.

• The formula is the cycle length minus maintenance and training.

• For example, in the 36-month O-FRP cycle, there are approximately 6 months maintenance and 6 training. Therefore, AO is approximately 24 months.

AO = [ Cycle length – (maintenance time and training time)]

AO = 36-(6+6) = 24

• This does not mean that a Carrier Strike Group will be deployed for the entire Operational Availability. Under O-FRP, deployment lengths are metered by Service Quality of Life factors. AO is simply a measure of when a platform is employable, and is used for planning both for rotational deployment and to determine surge capacity should a National emergency arise.


FRP Length

• 36 month FRP cycle becomes the foundation upon which we generate CSGs ready for deployment and provides maximum Ao for CSG presence/funding level.

• Under a sustainable O-FRP, a single 8 month deployment generates a deployed to FRP ratio (D/FRP) of 0.22 (or in other terms 5 CVNs can generate 1.0 global presence) with the ability to go to 0.38 (or 3 CVNs to generate a 1.0 presence) should resources ever become available.

• These CSGs will be composed of 7-8, vice current 3-4, surface combatants who will be aligned under a single DESRON and will aggregate for training and certification.

• Surface combatants’ deployment dates may vary slightly due to maintaining Global Force Management Allocation Plan (GFMAP) adjudicated presence requirements: Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD), SCAN EAGLE, and FIRE SCOUT.


CSG Alignment

Iterative changes will be required in out years to complete

• Problem:

CSG and Destroyer Squadron Misalignment

- Operational Control (OPCON) and Administrative Control (ADCON) Chain of Command and FITREPS

- DESRON Commanders do not deploy with their assigned SC

- CSGs deploy with SC from multiple squadrons

– Multiple Independent deployer CERTEX events required

• Advanced training produces lesser qualification (MSO vs. MCO)

- DESRON SC FRP cycles not in alignment

- Capability mismatch with CSG

• Solution:

Fixed CSG Composition

- C2 Aligned with FRP cycle- OPCON aligned with deployment

cycle- SC schedules more predictable- BMD integrated within CSG- Surface combatant CMP aligned

with CVN- Cost effective, Major Combat

Operations Independent deployers


CSG Alignment

• When examining DESRON alignments in conjunction with O-FRP, we saw an opportunity to fix numerous discrepancies, such as wholesale surface combatant swap outs between CSG multiple deployments as well as integrating BMD capability into CSGs.

• O-FRP aligns surface combatant and CVN/CVW cycles to optimize resources required to achieve deployment certification.

• Simple administrative alignment near term achieves 90% DESRON alignment. 21 of 29 moves have been mapped out for TYCOM execution to support 4 CSG’s.

• USFF is changing DESRON assignments so that all CRUDES will be aligned to their CSGs starting with the GHWB CSG for their FEB 2014 deployment.

• Ownership alignment also allows ISICs to begin transmitting Commanders’ intent to assigned units early – operational and professional expectations.


Manning Wholeness

• Personnel readiness standard– 92/95/1 minimum deployment manning levels – Take risk in non-deployed units and post

deployment surge

• Actions to achieve wholeness– Recruit/Access to meet demand– Manage ‘Street to Fleet’ supply chain– Fund the Individuals Accounts– Define and prioritize critical operational

shore duty billets

• Manage and sustain wholeness– Report and manage individual PERSTEMPO– Incentivize and retain quality sailors– Manage FIT/FILL risk ashore– Established PERS-454 to streamline LIMDU

process

Nov-1

2Dec

-12

Jan-

13Fe

b-13

Mar

-13

Apr-1

3M

ay-1

3Ju

n-13

Jul-1

3Au

g-13

Sep-

13Oct

-13

Nov-1

3Dec

-13

Jan-

14Fe

b-14

Mar

-14

Apr-1

4M

ay-1

4Ju

n-14

80.0%

85.0%

90.0%

95.0%

100.0%

Fit Fill Fit Forecast

Fill Forecast Fit Threshold


• In the previous slide, we used “92/95/1” as our endstate. This is also known as “FIT / FILL / Critical NEC”

• The first number is “FIT”– This indicates that a commanding officer will have 92 percent of sailors

authorized with the right skill sets

• The second number is “FILL”– This number indicates that at least 95 percent of the required manning is on

board

• The third and final number indicates that there is at least 1 sailor on board that has the qualifications for every critical Navy Enlisted Classification (NEC)

FIT/FILL/CRITICAL NEC


• The Fleet continues to face a fit/fill below the standard of 90/90/1 with an upward in trend of cross decks and diverts needed to maintain that standard.

• After a TYCOM RKC review and a USFF N1 led Navy-wide working group, a CNO approved POAM was developed to increase the personnel readiness target, set actions to achieve wholeness and manage and sustain the gains.

• OPNAV N1 was given the lead to execute the POAM.

Manning


HST CSG Manning to O-FRP

77%

82%

87%

92%

97%

102%

Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14

H S T C S GS J A F i l l ( P a y b a n d )

FILL THRESHOLD SUP FILL JNY FILL APP FILL

77%

82%

87%

92%

97%

102%


H S T C S GS J A F i t ( P a y b a n d )

FIT THRESHOLD SUP FIT JNY FIT APP FIT

CVN 75 H.S. TRUMAN 92% 90% 70% 70% 90 40

COMCARSTRKGRU 10 90% 90% 53% 53% 87 1

CG 72 VELLA GULF 90% 85% 73% 73% 85 20

CG 61 MONTEREY 90% 89% 71% 71% 86 7

CG 56 SAN J ACINTO 89% 86% 73% 73% 85 17

DDG 80 ROOSEVELT 94% 90% 67% 67% 86 6

DDG 87 MASON 85% 83% 65% 65% 82 23

DDG 94 NITZE 85% 83% 65% 65% 82 23

CVW 3 104% 91% 45% 45% 87 1

VFA 32 90% 86% 75% 75% 89 12

VFA 37 94% 92% 64% 64% 89 0

VFA 105 90% 89% 80% 80% 89 6

VAW 126 88% 85% 72% 72% 83 9

VAQ 130 89% 87% 80% 80% 89 7

HSC 7 94% 91% 81% 81% 87 1

HSM 74 96% 89% 60% 60% 84 7

180

Current Month

Total

Required Manning

Actions to 92% (based on Current

Month)

UnitRCN Fit

%RCN Fill

%NEC Fit

%Crit NEC

Fit %

BBD QoA (New

Metric Under

Review)

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%H S T F I L L / F I T

RCN Fill Threshold

RCN Fill

RCN Fill Proj

RCN Fit Threshold

RCN Fit

RCN Fit Proj

NEC Fit

NEC Fit Proj

Crit NEC Fit

Crit NEC Fit Proj

BBD QofA

BBD P4 ProjAvailMaintenance Basic Integrated

Achievement of 92% Fit and 95% Fill Sus

COGNOS Data Source : Nov 5, 2013

0

20

40


M a n n i n g A c ti o n sDistribution Unplanned

TBD


• CNO Availability schedules are set:– Aligned with CRUDES assignment to CSGs– Stable, predictable and integrated maintenance and modernization plan– Proper availability planning– Allowance for timely port loading adjustments– Integrated with assessments– Aligns Surface Ship Class Maintenance Plan to 36 months to match CVNs

• Modernization improvements:– Interoperable and aligned CSG/ARG C5I capabilities– Integrated SOVT test to include all associated supporting systems

• Improved aircraft inventory management to fully support training plan

• Adjust SFRM to 36 month FRP

Maintenance & Modernization

Stable, Predictable, Integrated Maintenance & Modernization

that aligns and synchronizes CSG capabilities


• Turning to maintenance and using the kill chain “As is” / “To be” construct, we found that maintenance was impacted by changes in schedules and funding, and is constrained by port loading.

• Thumb-rule used by maintenance providers is that costs go up by 3x for work packages changes through mid-availability and as much as 8X for changes in work packages from mid-to-late availability. So, this is a significant cost driver.

• We also found that modernization is not aligned to the group and that there is significant variance in combat systems. For instance, in the 62 ship Arleigh Burke Class, there are 42 different configurations of only 8 major C4I systems. Clearly, an interoperability challenge.

• Configuration variance reduction is one element that will improve maintenance and modernization execution.

• Providing a stable and predictable FRP length with clear ownership alignment to a particular CSG would alleviate many of these challenges.

Maintenance & Modernization


Maintenance & Modernization RKC Analysis

• Commander’s Intent– Use a Readiness Kill Chain approach – Analyze the various stages of the end to end process

• Ship/Submarine Maintenance and Modernization:– NAVSEA lead– Drive Work Package development and Planning effort to be done

earlier– Integrate Class Maintenance Plan requirements with Modernization

• Aircraft Depot Maintenance

- NAVAIR lead


• Spares availability critical to readiness• Stagnant/downward trends in key indicators drove action to get right parts

on the shelves• Outfitting Spares

– Additional $51M added to outfitting spares accounts May’13; minimal spares backlog

– Outfitting spares funding “green” across Future Year Defense Plan• Fleet Shipboard Spares

– Significant investments in AEGIS/BMD spares FY10-13– COSAL updates every 2 months since July 2012– Additional $21M investment in surface spares end of Fiscal Year 2013

• Ship Construction Spares– $14.6M added back to LPD-25 & LHA-6 programs end of Fiscal Year 2013

Surface Spares Wholeness

Coordinated Shipboard Allowance List (COSAL) effectiveness improving and expected to continue


Inspections

28

INSPECTION PERIOD III

Maintenance Basic Integrated Deployment

MCMA

INSURV MI / MCMA

FUTURE:

“As-Is”

“To-Be”

= Independent Inspections

INSPECTION PERIOD I

INSPECTION PERIOD II

MI

CNO designated USFF as Executive Agent for Fleet Assessment:- Oversee changes to

Inspections, Certifications, Assessment and Visits events

- Approval authority for new or expanded requirements

- Standardize Assessment Criteria

- Maximize training value- Develop enduring process for

continual review- Lead senior advisory group to

CNO on ICAV matters

PRESENT: 466 inspections


• This diagram approaches inspection and assessment processes in the “As is: at top and “To be” on the bottom of the chart. The curves represent a generic readiness curve and are sub divided horizontally by phase.

• Our Fleet Action Working Group found that there are 466 different inspections, certifications, assists and visits scattered across the FRP. Some of these are time based, some are conditions based and others are policy or law. Many are, frankly, outdated.

• Developing an assessment and inspection continuum across the FRP will:—Optimize external assessment and inspection events to eliminate redundancy—Optimize assessment timing within the FRP—Standardize assessment and inspection requirements—Standardize expectations to minimize impacts to ship’s force personnel

• Develop institutionalized process for continuous adjudication of future inspections within the FRP.

Inspections


Creating a Smarter INSURV

• Reduced from 5 days to 3 days– Commences on Tuesday vice Monday to reduce burden on crew

• Improved Operational Risk Management– Ships do not get underway before 0700 to enhance safety– Ship leadership afforded crew rest through improved scheduling of events and

elimination of redundant and out dated requirements

• Linked to Readiness Events– Accepts TYCOM TSRA PMS data as INSURV data. This makes INSURV even

shorter (3 days or less)

• Analyzes more data over broader period of time– Collects TYCOM mid-cycle assessment data as INSURV data. This increases the

amount of data used to identify maintenance and readiness trends

• (U)


EA For Fleet Assessments

PHASE ONEFAWG

PHASE TWOTYCOM/SYSCOM REVIEWS

PHASE FOURCENTRAL ICAV AUTHORITY

(CICAVA)

PHASE THREEFLEET CDR REVIEW

PHASE FIVESTEADY STATE

DELIVERABLES1. EA FOR ICAV DESIGNATED –

COMPLETE2. REFINE/CONCUR WITH ICAV

CONCEPT - COMPLETE3. COMMENT/CONCUR WITH ICAV

CHANGES – STAKEHOLDERS REVIEWING CHARTER

4. All AIRFOR AND SURFOR ICAVs TIED TO FOUR PHASES IN FRP – COMPLETE

5. AIRFOR AND SURFOR IDENTIFIED ICAVS TO COMBINE - COMPLETE

6. LINKAGE INSTRUCTION DRAFTED AND TESTED ON JET BLAST DEFLECTORS (JBDs) –COMPLETE

7. SUBLANT JOINED FAWG

DELIVERABLES1. “AS-IS” ICAV

LIST – CMP2. PROPOSED

ICAV CHANGES COMPLETE

3. PROPOSED “TO-BE” STATE COMPLETE

4. ICAV CHARTER DRAFTED

5. RESOURCESDELIVERABLES

1. DRAFT AND SIGN ICAV INSTRUCTION2. ASSUME DUTIES FROM FAWG3. PRIORITIZE ICAV CHANGES4. DEVELOP ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY5. SURFACE SHIP INSURV

INSPECTIONS REDUCED TO 3.5 DAYS – APR 2014

DELIVERABLES1. CICAVA ACTS AS

THE GATEKEEPER TO SYNCHRONIZE ALL ICAV EVENTS

2. CICAVA EXTENDS PROCESS TO OTHER FRP-DRIVEN ENTITIES

DELIVERABLES1. SIGN CHARTER – TYCOMS

HAVE REVIEWED WITH ONLY MINOR CHANGES

2. DESIGNATE CICAVA –CONTAINED WITHIN CHARTER

3. STANDUP CICAVA4. RESOURCE CICAVA5. INSURV MESSAGE6. INSURV HAS ACTION TO

LEAD LINKAGE ESTABLISHMENT BETWEEN TYCOM AND INSURV INSPECTIONS

IPR25 SEP 13

18 OCT 13

ECD14 FEB 14

ECD1 OCT 14

CICAVA MAKES CHANGESDELETE, MOVE CONSOLIDATE,

AND OPTIMIZE ICAV EVENTS(MOVE FROM AS-IS TO TO-BE)

DELIVERABLESBLUE – COMPLETEDRED – NOT COMPLETED

17 JAN 14


O-FRP Training

• Carrier, air-wing, and all surface combatants training aligned • ALL units trained to one standard• People and equipment ready for training at the end of maintenance

• Basic unit training– Retains training time entitlement– Integrates inspection, certification, and continuous maintenance requirements

• Advanced unit and integrated group training– Standardized Group Sail – More efficient training schedule– Standardized training Fleet-wide

Synthetic

CVW FALLON

Live

CVW

CRUDES

CVN Academic

GroupSail

TSTA / FEP

14 Weeks

TSTAWCC

A-A ARP

CVN

TIER 1 - Mobility READ-6 / CMAV

TIER 2 - Unit Tactical

A-G ARPCVW

CRUDES

Non Skid

24 Weeks

TYCOM Tasking


Operational Level to Tactical Level Headquarter Alignment

• Aligned and standardized Navy warfighting staffs from operational to tactical level

– Functions based on Mission Essential Tasks aligned from Combatant to Tactical Commander

– Personnel assigned with right skill sets to meet HQ “fit”

– Interoperable systems between Operational and Tactical Level HQ

– Standardized and codified staff training and exercise program

Optimized – Fleet Response Plan will provide aligned and standardized Operational and Tactical Level Headquarters

NCC

Combatant Commander

CSG, CVW, DESRON, PHIBRON

Standardization

Ali

gn

men

t

CTFCTG


• Both tactical and operational (TL / OL) staffs have 2 main focus areas:—Support commander’s decision cycle, and assure subordinate success

• Key elements in the kill chain are Tactical and Operational Level staffs.• TL HQs need to be functionally aligned to OL HQs.• Achieving this requires standardized tactical staff academic training.• Revised Strike Group Tactical Training Continuum (SGTTC) codifies

individual training for tactical staffs.—Standardizes training by billet

• Includes CSG CDR, CVW, DESRON, ESG, PHIBRON, TACRON, Warfare CDRS, and staffs

• Sets individual requirements for pipeline and Fleet training

Headquarters Alignment


Lin

es o

f E

ffo

rtOptimized FRP

Lines of Effort

Foundation to O-FRP ---------- CVN/CVW There Now ---------- SC w/HST

HST

HST – IOC MAY 14

HST

HST

HST

HST / GHWB / TR by MSG – AUG 13

GHWB – IOC AUG 13

TR – IOC SEP 13

GHWB VIN TR

GHWB VIN

GHWB VIN

GHWB VIN

HST GHWB VIN TR

OL/TL HQ’s(USFF / CPF N7)

Advanced Training

(USFF / CPF N7)

Unit Training(TYCOMs)

CSG Alignment

(USFF / CPF N3)

FRP Length(USFF/CPF

OPNAV N43)

Inspections(USFF/CPF N43)

Parts(USFF / CPF N41OPNAV N8/N9)


(USFF / CPF N43/N6)

Manning/Individual Training(USFF / OPNAV N1)


• Starts with maintenance cycle in Nov 14. CRUDES will be aligned by HST CSG FRP start (NOV 2014), pending rework of class maintenance plans by NAVSEA.

• Inspections begin approximately 1 month prior to Basic training phase

• Manning is aligned to Basic training phase to gain efficiency in training audience participating in all of work-ups

• Integrated training occurs in Nov 15

• CSG alignment has already started by message in Aug 13 for HST / GHWB / and TR. The first CSG to be aligned for deployment will be GHWB in Feb 14.

• HST CSG staff will receive pipeline and fleet training for OL/TL alignment in May 14.

First O-FRP CSG: TRUMAN


• The other CSGs officially enter O-FRP at the maintenance phase: GHWB – May 14, VIN – Jul 15, TR – Dec 15

• Where able, we have instituted elements of O-FRP as early as possible. GHWB conducted elements of Integrated training by conducting a new GRP Sail event.

• TR is conducting increased integrated training b/c of NIFC-CA. CSG alignment for HST / GHWB / TR is de facto complete after the first ADCON shift message in August 13 (CCSGs already briefing their “to be” units at update briefs)

Follow On Carrier Strike Groups


Assess

EndsWays

RESOURCE/ POLICY

ACCESS /PROCURE

PRE-INTRO

BASIC INTEGRATEDMAINT DEPLOY &SUSTAIN

FRP

2. O-FRP………………..• OL/TL HQs………………………………………………………………………………………….• Advanced Training...........................................................................................................• Unit Training…………………………………………………………………………………………....• Inspections…………………………………………………………………………………………..….• Parts…………………………………………………..• Maintenance……………………………………………………………………………………….…..• Manning…………………….• CSG Alignment…………………………………………………………………………………………• FRP Length……………………….

Man

agin

g W

hole

ness

Means•Personnel•Equipment •Supplies •Training•Ordnance•Networks

• Installations•Community• Industry•Elected Leaders

Governance / C2 – Drives integration & synchronization vertically across weapons systems & horizontally across the readiness lifecycle

1. Cost to Own..……

3. Surge Capacity.....

Readiness Kill ChainNavy-Wide Approach to Managing Wholeness

It takes everyone to manage Fleet wholeness across the Readiness Kill Chain


Lin

es o

f E

ffo

rt

Advanced Training


Manning/Individual Training

CSG Alignment

FRP Length

Unit Training

Inspections

Operational & Tactical HQ’s

Optimized FRPTake Aways

Parts

Standardize & align NCC, CSG and Warfare CDR training tracks

Combine JTFX / C2X; standardize Group Sail; NIFC-CA & EMMW

ISIC-led, CSG-wide aggregated training with a predictable schedule

Consolidate to specific inspection periods aligned to the FRP

RKC methodology to ensure spares are available when needed

Stable, predicable, synchronized execution of Maint & Modernization

Sea Centric Manning; Incentivize and Retain Quality Sailors

C2 aligned with FRP cycle

36 Month Fleetwide introduction begins with TRUMAN CSG in Nov 2014


UNCLASSIFIED

15 january 2014

Documents

fleet capability

fleet synchronization

optimized fleet response

fleet response plan

readiness production

deployed readiness

desired end states

rkc approach