1/35 future magnetic storage media jim miles electronic and information storage systems research...
Post on 20-Dec-2015
216 views
TRANSCRIPT
1/35
Future Magnetic Storage Media
Jim Miles
Electronic and Information Storage Systems Research Group
2/35
Future Magnetic Storage Media
1. Media requirements for very high density
2. Model description
3. Predicted effects of grain size distribution
4. Patterned media: possible routes
5. Conclusions
3/35
Granular or Patterned Media?
4/35
5/35
Granular Media Limitations
WD
The transition from one bit to another follows the grains…
(or maybe clusters of grains).
Jitter
Small grains are needed for low noise.
WD
6/35
Writing to Media
Anisotropy Ku
Magnetisation MS
0MS
Field H > HK = 2KU
A sufficiently large field is needed to overcome the anisotropy of the material, which keeps magnetisation aligned along one axis
7/35
Thermal Stability of Media
• Energy barrier EB = KUV
• Thermal energy ~ KBT
• Spontaneous switching
when EB < 70KBT
• Require EB ~70 KBT
8/35
To Increase the Density:
• Decrease the bit length: Jitter must decrease• Decrease the track width W: Jitter must not
increase.• Jitter , grain diameter D must fall
• Volume V = D2t/4 Volume falls KU must rise to keep EB = KUV high enough bigger write field H > 2KU/0MS is needed.
• Density can only rise by increasing write field.
WD
9/35
Perpendicular Recording
Increases write field, but only by ~ x2…
10/35
Other Problems of Granular Media
• Media are granular.• Grains are not equal-sized.• Typically D ~ 0.2<D>, V ~ 0.4<V>• Hypothesis - Irregularity in media structure
produces noise:– Big grains give big transition deviations;– Different grain volumes switch more or less easily;– Different grains see different local interaction fields.
11/35
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
x 10-7
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
x 10-7
Perpendicular Media Modelling
Real Storage Medium Model Storage Medium (not to identical scale)
12/35
•Landau-Lifshitz dynamic and M-C thermal solvers.
•Arbitrary sequences of uniform vector applied fields
•Recording simulation with FEM or analytical head fields.
•Soft underlayer by perfect imaging
•Microstructural clustering and texturing.
•Fully arbitrary grain positions and shapes.
•Full account of grain shape in interaction fields
•Allows vertical sub-division and tilted columns (MET like)
Manchester MicroMagnetic Multilayer Media Model (M6)
13/35
Magnetostatic Interaction - Pairs of Grains
Magnetostatic interaction tensors D are computed numerically
‘Field’ grain experiences a field that varies through the volume.
Surface charge from each polygon face of the source generates field. Typically 48 faces per polygon.
Top and bottom faces computed similarly by division into strips.
Interaction Field: Hj = Dij Mi
Integrate over the surface charge of i and the volume of j.
Underlayer included by incorporating images into Dij
Mi
Hj
ji
s ij
xixji
v
xyij dvds
ij
3
ˆ.
4
1
rr
rryMD
14/35
Exchange Interaction - Pairs of GrainsExchange interaction factors are computed numerically
Integral term computed numerically from polygon geometry
iijjsj
iex xd
dx
v
t
M
AH m
)(
2
0, jiex
NN
iexE MH .,
10
x
x
dij
diji (source)
j (field)
Grain j experiences an exchange field
due to grain i
15/35
Varying Grain Size• Voronoi seed positions randomised • Minimum grain boundary width 0.7nm fixed• Number of grains/m2 and packing fraction fixed• Mean grain volume remains constant Hex remains constant
5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9x 10-8
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
x 10-8
Downtrack (m)
Cro
sstr
ack
(m)
6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5x 10-8
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5x 10-8
Downtrack (m)
Cro
sstr
ack
(m)
1.15 1.2 1.25 1.3 1.35 1.4 1.45x 10-7
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
8.5
x 10-8
Downtrack (m)
Cro
sstr
ack
(m)
σv/<v> = 0% σv/<v> = 15% σv/<v> = 39%
16/35
0 5 10 15 20 25 300
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Area (nm2)
Freq
uenc
yGrain Size Distributions
σv/<v> = 0% σv/<v> = 4.7% σv/<v> = 10.2% σv/<v> = 15.5% σv/<v> = 22.6% σv/<v> = 29.4% σv/<v> = 38.7%
17/35
0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.40
20
40
60
80
100
Hey/<He>
% o
f gra
ins
Exchange Field Distributions
Average exchange field does not change as the microstructure changes.
HE = 0.5 HD
A = 1.85x10-13
for all structures
σv/<v> = 0% σv/<v> = 4.7% σv/<v> = 10.2% σv/<v> = 15.5% σv/<v> = 22.6% σv/<v> = 29.4% σv/<v> = 38.7%
18/35
Exchange Interaction Between Pairs of Grains Width of line Hex
Uniform grains, perfect hexagonal lattice. Exchange field is identical between all pairs.
Thermally decayed from DC saturated
σv/<v> = 0
HE/HD = 0.5
4 5 6 7 8 9
x 10-8
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
8.5
9
x 10-8
19/35
Exchange Interaction Between Pairs of GrainsWidth of line Hex
0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
x 10-7
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
x 10-8
Large volume distribution:
σv/<v> = 39%
Irregular structure, Large variation in HE
<HE>/<HD> = 0.5
20/35
0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.50
20
40
60
80
100
Hdy/<Hd>
% o
f gra
ins
Magnetostatic (Demag) Field Distributions
σv/<v> = 0% σv/<v> = 4.7% σv/<v> = 10.2% σv/<v> = 15.5% σv/<v> = 22.6% σv/<v> = 29.4% σv/<v> = 38.7%
21/35
10 20 30 40 50 60 700
20
40
60
80
100
Eb/KbT
% o
f Mag
net
ic M
ate
rial
Energy Barrier Distributions
σv/<v> = 0% σv/<v> = 4.7% σv/<v> = 10.2% σv/<v> = 15.5% σv/<v> = 22.6% σv/<v> = 29.4% σv/<v> = 38.7%
22/35
2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5
x 10-7
0
2
4
6
8
10
x 10-8
3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5
x 10-7
2
4
6
8
10
x 10-8
Recorded Transitions, b=20nm, Tp = 80nm, 411 Gb/in2
σv/<v> = 39%
σv/<v> = 0%
23/35
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4x 10
6
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
kfrci
Fu
nd
ma
me
nta
l/Ms
Effect of Irregularity on Data Signal
σv/<v> = 0% σv/<v> = 4.7% σv/<v> = 10.2% σv/<v> = 15.5% σv/<v> = 22.6% σv/<v> = 29.4% σv/<v> = 38.7%
24/35
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
x 106
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
kfrci
sigm
aMp/
<Mp>
Effect of Irregularity on Noise
σv/<v> = 0% σv/<v> = 4.7% σv/<v> = 10.2% σv/<v> = 15.5% σv/<v> = 22.6% σv/<v> = 29.4% σv/<v> = 38.7%
25/35
Grain Microstructure Conclusions
• Grain size distributions give rise to decreased signal and increased noise (BAD)
• Media with small grain size distributions are needed
• Patterned media are needed
• Additional advantage: switching volume is the bit size, not the grain size lower switching field is possible.
26/35
Tom Thomson
27/35
Tom Thomson
28/35
Direct Write e-beam
1. Form master by direct write e-beam on resist layer
2. Evaporate gold coating
3. Lift-off gold from unexposed areas
4. Etch to remove magnetic layer except where protected by gold
50 nm diameter islandsB. Belle et. al.University of Manchester
29/35
Patterned Media Potential
• Provides a route to regular arrays of thermally stable low noise
• 1Tb/in2 requires 12.5nm lithography
• Not feasible using semiconductor manufacturing technology for some years to come…
30/35
Self-Organised Magnetic Assembly (SOMA Media)
1. FePt nanoparticles manufactured in aqueous suspension.
2. Very narrow size distribution.
3. Deposited onto substrate.
4. Self-Assemble into ordered structure.
31/35
FePt Particle Growth
32/35
FePt problemsFePt manufactured in solution has low Ku.
Very high Ku can be developed by annealing:
Much ongoing research in low temperature formation of high coercivity FePt…
33/35
Other Potential Technologies
Electro-chemical deposition in self-ordered templates: University of Southampton.
Electroplating into self-ordered pores in Alumite: R. Pollard et. al, Queens University Belfast.
Vacuum deposition through self-assembled nanosphere templates: Paul Nutter, Ernie Hill, University of Manchester.
34/35
Self-Assembly – Long Range Order
40nm diameter CoCrPt nanoparticles. Mask made from a diblock co-polymer (polystyrene/PMMA), self-assembled in nanoimprinted grooves.
(Naito et al, Toshiba, IEEE Trans. Magn 38 (5) (2002)
Self-assembled pattern using a diblock co-polymer (in nanoimprinted grooves.
(C. Ross et al, MIT, 2002)
Self-assembly produces only local order. Over long ranges order breaks down at dislocations.
35/35
Conclusions
• Conventional media can only be extended so far.• Patterned media overcome thermal stability issues.• Higher stability granular materials could be used
with heat assisted recording (HAMR)• …but patterned media might still be needed to
avoid excessive transition noise.• Patterned media are likely to be necessary in ~5
years