13 antitrust and regulation

79
1 Chapter 13 Antitrust and Regulation Key Concepts Summary Practice Quiz Internet Exercises ©2000 South-Western College Publishing

Upload: nepdevwiki

Post on 22-Nov-2014

686 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 13 antitrust and regulation

1

Chapter 13 Antitrust and Regulation

• Key Concepts• Summary• Practice Quiz• Internet Exercises

©2000 South-Western College Publishing

Page 2: 13 antitrust and regulation

2

In this chapter, you will learn to solve these economic puzzles:

Why is market failure an economic rationale

for regulation?

Why doesn’t the water company or electric company compete?

Can universities and colleges improve

education by engaging in price-fixing?

Page 3: 13 antitrust and regulation

3

What is a Trust?A combination or

cartel consisting of firms that place their assets in the custody of a board of trustees

Page 4: 13 antitrust and regulation

4

What isPredatory Pricing?

The practice of one or more firms temporarily reducing prices in order to eliminate competition and then raising prices

Page 5: 13 antitrust and regulation

5

When was the age of the Robber Barons?

In the later part of the 1800’s

Page 6: 13 antitrust and regulation

6

What was done to limit the power of Trusts?

Congress passed laws aimed at preventing firms from engaging in anticompetitive activities

Page 7: 13 antitrust and regulation

7

What is theSherman Act?

The federal antitrust law enacted in 1890 that prohibits monopolization and conspiracies to restrain trade

Page 8: 13 antitrust and regulation

8

What is the Clayton Act?A 1914 amendment that

strengthens the Sherman Act by making it illegal for firms to engage in certain anticompetitive business practices

Page 9: 13 antitrust and regulation

9

What business practices were declared illegal

under the Clayton Act?• Price discrimination• Exclusive dealing• Tying contracts• Stock acquisition of

competing companies• Interlocking directorates

Page 10: 13 antitrust and regulation

10

Was the Clayton Act an improvement over the

Sherman Act?Although more specific

than the Sherman Act, the Clayton Act is also vague

Page 11: 13 antitrust and regulation

11

What is the Federal Trade Commission Act? The federal act that in 1914

established the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to investigate unfair competitive practices of firms

Page 12: 13 antitrust and regulation

12

What is theRobinson-Patman Act?

A 1936 amendment to the Clayton Act that strengthens the Clayton Act against price discrimination

Page 13: 13 antitrust and regulation

13

What is the basic purpose of the

Robinson-Patman Act?To prevent large sellers from

offering different prices to different buyers where the effect is to harm even a single small firm

Page 14: 13 antitrust and regulation

14

What is theCeller-Kefauver Act?

A 1950 amendment to the Clayton Act that prohibits one firm from merging with a competitor by purchasing its physical assets if the effect is to substantially lessen competition

Page 15: 13 antitrust and regulation

15

What are some key Antitrust cases?

• Standard Oil Case 1911• Alcoa Case 1945• IBM Case 1982• AT&T Case 1982• MIT Case 1992• Microsoft Case 1995

Page 16: 13 antitrust and regulation

16

What was the outcome of the Standard Oil Case?

The Rule of Reason

Page 17: 13 antitrust and regulation

17

What is theRule of Reason?

The antitrust doctrine that the existence of monopoly alone is not illegal unless the monopoly engages in illegal business practices

Page 18: 13 antitrust and regulation

18

What was the outcome of the Alcoa Case?

The Per se Rule

Page 19: 13 antitrust and regulation

19

What is the Per se Rule?The antitrust doctrine that

the existence of monopoly alone is illegal, regardless of whether or not the monopoly engages in illegal business practices

Page 20: 13 antitrust and regulation

20

What was the result of the IBM Case?

A switch back to the Rule of Reason

Page 21: 13 antitrust and regulation

21

What was the result of the AT&T Case?

Technology made this government-regulated natural monopoly obsolete, and AT&T was found guilty of anticompetitive pricing

Page 22: 13 antitrust and regulation

22

What was the result of the MIT Case?

Eight Ivy League schools agreed to stop colluding to fix prices, and MIT was found guilty of price fixing

Page 23: 13 antitrust and regulation

23

What was the result of the Microsoft Case?

Microsoft was not allowed to purchase Intuit Inc., a competitor in the personal finance software industry

Page 24: 13 antitrust and regulation

24

How can firms avoid charges of Price Fixing?

They can merge into one company

Page 25: 13 antitrust and regulation

25

When did a lot of Mergers begin taking place?

In the 1980’s

Page 26: 13 antitrust and regulation

26

What are the different types of Mergers?

• Horizontal • Vertical• Conglomerate

Page 27: 13 antitrust and regulation

27

What is aHorizontal Merger?A merger of firms that competes in the same market

Page 28: 13 antitrust and regulation

28

What is aVertical Merger?A merger of a firm with its suppliers

Page 29: 13 antitrust and regulation

29

What is aConglomerate Merger?A merger between firms in

unregulated markets

Page 30: 13 antitrust and regulation

30

What can be said about Conglomerate Mergers?

They are generally allowed because they do not significantly decrease competition

Page 31: 13 antitrust and regulation

31

What can be said about Antitrust Laws in other Countries?

They are weak in comparison to U.S. antitrust laws

Page 32: 13 antitrust and regulation

32

What is the history of Government Regulation?

From the later part of the 1800’s to the 1970’s, there was an increase in regulation; in the 1970’s there was a movement away from regulation

Page 33: 13 antitrust and regulation

33

What is the basic argument in favor of

Government Regulation?Market failure

Page 34: 13 antitrust and regulation

34

In what ways does the Market Fail?

• Natural monopoly• Externalities• Imperfect information

Page 35: 13 antitrust and regulation

35

What is aNatural Monopoly?

An industry in which long-run average cost is minimized when only one firm serves the market

Page 36: 13 antitrust and regulation

36

What isMarginal Cost Pricing?A system of pricing in

which the price charged equals the marginal cost of the last unit produced

Page 37: 13 antitrust and regulation

37

$20$15$10

$5

1 2 3 4

$25$30$40$50

5 6 7 8 9DMR

Regulated Monopoly

LRMC

A

B

C

P

Q

efficient price

LRAC

Fair return price

Page 38: 13 antitrust and regulation

38

What is aNormal Profit?

The accounting profit required to induce a

firm’s owners to employ their

resources in the firm

Page 39: 13 antitrust and regulation

39

Do Production Costs include Normal Profit?

Yes, because normal profit is considered a necessary

expense of a business

Page 40: 13 antitrust and regulation

40

What kind of Profit is made at the

Fair Return Price?Normal Profit

Page 41: 13 antitrust and regulation

41

What happens when Pollution is present?

Pollution causes polluting firms to overproduce, while causing firms that pay the cost of cleaning up the pollution to underproduce

Page 42: 13 antitrust and regulation

42

What can be done when the Externality of

Pollution is present?The government can

regulate the industry to minimize the pollution

Page 43: 13 antitrust and regulation

43

What happens with Imperfect Information?Deficient information on

unsafe products can cause consumers to overconsume a product

Page 44: 13 antitrust and regulation

44

$10

$5

25 50

$15

$20

75 100

Impact of Imperfect Information

E2

P

Q

D1

E1 S

D2

Page 45: 13 antitrust and regulation

45

Consumers informed of

defect

Increase in Demand

Decrease in quantity supplied

Page 46: 13 antitrust and regulation

46

Key Concepts

Page 47: 13 antitrust and regulation

47

Key Concepts• What is a Trust?• What is Predatory Pricing?• What is the Sherman Act?• What is the Clayton Act?• What is the Federal Trade Commission Act?• What is the Robinson-Patman Act?• What is the Celler-Kefauver Act?• What is the Rule of Reason?• What is the Per se Rule?

Page 48: 13 antitrust and regulation

48

Key Concepts cont.• What are the different types of Mergers?• What is a Horizontal Merger?• What is a Vertical Merger?• What is a Conglomerate Merger?• What can be said about Antitrust Laws in other

Countries?• What is a Natural Monopoly?• What happens when Pollution is present?• What happens with Imperfect Information?

Page 49: 13 antitrust and regulation

49

Summary

Page 50: 13 antitrust and regulation

50

A trust is a cartel that places the assets of competing companies in the custody of a board of trustees. During the last decades of the 19th century, trusts engaged in anticompetitive strategies to eliminate competition and raise prices, such as predatory pricing.

Page 51: 13 antitrust and regulation

51

The Sherman Act of 1890 and the Clayton Act of 1914 are the two most important antitrust laws. The Sherman Act marked the first attempt of the U.S. government to outlaw monopolizing behavior. Because this act was vague, the Clayton Act was passed to define anticompetitive behavior more precisely.

Page 52: 13 antitrust and regulation

52

The Clayton Act prohibited (1) price discrimination, (2) exclusive dealing, (3) tying contracts, (4) stock acquisition, and (5) interlocking directorates.

Page 53: 13 antitrust and regulation

53

The Robinson-Patman Act of 1936 strengthened the Clayton Act by prohibiting certain forms of price discrimination. This law is called the “Chain Store Act” because it was aimed at large retail chain stores that were obtaining volume discounts.

Page 54: 13 antitrust and regulation

54

The Celler-Kefauver Act of 1950 strengthened the Clayton Act declaring illegal the acquisition of the assets of one firm by another firm if the effect is to lessen competition.

Page 55: 13 antitrust and regulation

55

The rule of reason and the per se rule are the two main philosophies the courts have used in interpreting antirust law. Under the rule of reason, monopolist were not subject to prosecution unless they acted in an anticompetitive manner.

Page 56: 13 antitrust and regulation

56

The Supreme Court decision in the Alcoa case of 1945 replaced the rule of reason with the per se rule, which states that the mere existence of monopoly is illegal. Today, the trend is in favor of dominant firms because of international competition.

Page 57: 13 antitrust and regulation

57

A horizontal merger is a merger of two competing firms. A vertical merger is a merger of two firms where one produces an input used by the other firm. A conglomerate merger is a merger of two firms producing unrelated products.

Page 58: 13 antitrust and regulation

58

Deregulation is a movement that began in the1980’s to eliminate regulations primarily in the transportation and telecommunications industries. Today, the current trend is toward further deregulation resulting from federal budget cuts.

Page 59: 13 antitrust and regulation

59

Marginal cost pricing is a competitive pricing strategy for a regulated natural monopoly. Using this approach, regulators set the monopolist’s price equal to its marginal cost. Another method is for regulators to establish a fair-return price equal to long-run average cost and the monopolist earns zero economic profit.

Page 60: 13 antitrust and regulation

60

Regulation of a natural monopoly is justified on the basis of market failure. Two other cases based on market failure include externalities and imperfect information.

Page 61: 13 antitrust and regulation

61

$20$15$10

$5

1 2 3 4

$25$30$40$50

5 6 7 8 9DMR

Regulated Monopoly

LRMC

A

B

C

P

Q

efficient price

LRAC

Fair return price

Page 62: 13 antitrust and regulation

62

Chapter 13 Quiz

©2000 South-Western College Publishing

Page 63: 13 antitrust and regulation

63

1. Which of the following is illegal under the Sherman Act?a. Attempts to monopolize.b. Price fixing.c. Formation of cartels.d. All of the above are illegal.

D. The Sherman Act of 1890 is the federal antitrust law to curb trusts, but the federal government did not win a notable case until 1911.

Page 64: 13 antitrust and regulation

64

2. Officers of five large building-materials companies meet and agree that none of them will submit bids on government contracts lower than an agreed-upon level. This is an example of a. price fixing.b. vertical restriction.c. a tying contract.d. an interlocking directorate.

A. The Sherman Act was enacted with vague language, but price fixing is clearly a “conspiracy in restraint of trade”.

Page 65: 13 antitrust and regulation

65

3. A fabric shop cannot sell Singer sewing machines if it also sells other brands of sewing machines. This is an example of a. a resale price maintenance.b. territorial restrictions.c. a tying agreement.d. exclusive dealing.

D. If the effect is to “substantially lessen competition” such as an agreement between a manufacturer and a retailer is a violation of the Clayton Act of 1914.

Page 66: 13 antitrust and regulation

66

4. Under the Clayton Act, horizontal mergers by stock acquisition were a. not considered.b. illegal if they could be shown to lessen

competition.c. illegal under any circumstances.d. legal if they could be shown to lessen

competition.

B. Horizontal mergers are combinations among competitors in the same industry which, if allowed, eliminate existing competition.

Page 67: 13 antitrust and regulation

67

5. Under the Clayton Act, which of the following was illegal even if it was not shown to lessen competition substantially?a. Price discrimination.b. Tying contracts.c. Horizontal mergers by stock acquisition.d. Interlocking directorates.

D. Interlocking directorates is the situation in which a director of one company serves on the board of directors of a competing company.

Page 68: 13 antitrust and regulation

68

6. The importance of the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 is that it a. set up an independent antitrust agency

with the power to investigate complaints.b. strengthened the law against mergers.c. strengthened the law against price

discrimination..d. none of the above.

A. The FTC Act of 1914 established a five-member commission appointed by the president to investigate “unfair methods of competition.”

Page 69: 13 antitrust and regulation

69

7. Which of the following is concerned primarily with price discrimination? a. The Sherman Act.b. The Clayton Act.c. The Robinson -Patman Act.d. The Celler-Kefauver Act.

C. The Robinson-Patman Act of 1936 is an amendment to the Clayton Act that strengthens the Clayton Act against price discrimination.

Page 70: 13 antitrust and regulation

70

8. Which of the following is concerned primarily with mergers? a. The Sherman Act.b. The Clayton Act.c. The Robinson-Patman Act.d. The Celler-Kefauver Act.

D. The Celler-Kefauver Act is called the “antimerger act” because it closed the loophole in the Clayton Act by prohibiting mergers by sale of physical assets.

Page 71: 13 antitrust and regulation

71

9. The Utah Pie case was brought under which of the following laws? a. The Sherman Act.b. The Federal Trade Commission Act.c. The Robinson-Patman Act.d. The Celler-Kefauver Act.

C. Utah Pie was a small frozen desert pie firm in Salt Lake City that used three outside national competitors for price discrimination. The Supreme Court ruled in Utah Pie’s favor.

Page 72: 13 antitrust and regulation

72

10. Although U.S. Steel controlled nearly 75% of the domestic iron and steel industry, in 1920 the Supreme Court ruled that the firm was not in violation of the Sherman Act because there was no evidence of abusive behavior. What antitrust doctrine was the court applying in this case? a. The rule of reason.b. The per se rule.c. The marginal cost pricing rule.d. The natural monopoly rule.

A. The rule of reason applied when a firm was not engaged in anticompetitive behavior.

Page 73: 13 antitrust and regulation

73

11. In which antitrust case did the Supreme Court begin to apply the per se rule to determine whether a firm was in violation of the Sherman Act? a. The Standard Oil case.b. The Alcoa case.c. The IBM case.d. The MIT case.

B. The Supreme Court decision in the Alcoa case of 1945 replaced the rule of reason with the per se rule, which states that the mere existence of monopoly is illegal.

Page 74: 13 antitrust and regulation

74

12. The Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) was established in a. 1887.b. 1890.c. 1929.d. 1933.

A. The ICC was established for the original purpose of regulating rail prices by reducing duplicate trains, depots, and tracks.

Page 75: 13 antitrust and regulation

75

13. Today, the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) regulates airline a. ticket prices.b. routes.c. safety.d. all of the above.e. none of the above; the CAB was

abolished in 1984.E. The CAB was established in 1938 to

regulate airline fares and air routes.

Page 76: 13 antitrust and regulation

76

14. Which of the following provides the basis for regulation? a. Natural monopoly.b. Externalities.c. Imperfect information.d. All of the above.

D. In each of these cases, the argument in favor of regulation is market failure.

Page 77: 13 antitrust and regulation

77

15. Consider a regulated natural monopoly. If the regulatory commission wants to establish a fair-return price, then it should set a price ceiling where the demand curve crosses the monopoly’s long-run a. marginal revenue curve.b. average revenue curve.c. marginal cost curve.d. average cost curve.

D. One method for regulators to establish a fair-return price is to set price equal to long-run average cost and the monopolist earns zero economic profit

Page 78: 13 antitrust and regulation

78

Internet ExercisesClick on the picture of the book,

choose updates by chapter for the latest internet exercises

Page 79: 13 antitrust and regulation

79

END