128. mariano mendoza and elvira lim v spouses leonora gomez

Upload: celinka-chun

Post on 25-Feb-2018

293 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/25/2019 128. Mariano Mendoza and Elvira Lim v Spouses Leonora Gomez

    1/1

    128. Mariano C. Mendoza and Elvira Lim vsSpouses Leonora and Gabriel Gomez

    Topic: Liability o a re!istered o"ner o a ve#icle

    $acts: %s a result o a ve#icular collision resultin! rom t#e driver&s

    ne!li!ence' respondents suered p#ysical in(uries and t#e )suzu truc*

    sustained e+tensive dama!es. ,ence' t#is case or dama!es.-espondents ar!ued t#at alt#ou!# t#e re!istered o"ner o t#e bus "as

    Lim' t#e actual o"ner o t#e bus "as Cirilo Enriuez /Enriuez0' "#o

    #ad t#e bus attac#ed "it# Mayamy Transportation Company /Mayamy

    Transport0 under t#e socalled *abit system. -espondents t#en

    impleaded bot# Lim and Enriuez.

    )ssue: #o is liable3 #o is deemed as Mendoza&s /driver0 employer3 )s

    it Enriuez' t#e actual o"ner o t#e bus or Lim' t#e re!istered o"ner o

    t#e bus3

    -ulin!:T#e re!istered o"ner is deemed t#e employer o t#e ne!li!ent driver'and is t#us vicariously liable under %rticle 2145' in relation to %rticle2186' o t#e Civil Code. T#e re!istered o"ner o t#e motor ve#icle is t#eemployer o t#e ne!li!ent driver' and t#e actual employer is consideredmerely as an a!ent o suc# o"ner. T#us' "#et#er t#ere is an employer7employee relations#ip bet"een t#e re!istered o"ner and t#e driver isirrelevant in determinin! t#e liability o t#e re!istered o"ner "#o t#ela" #olds primarily and directly responsible or any accident' in(ury ordeat# caused by t#e operation o t#e ve#icle in t#e streets and #i!#"ays

    %s suc#' t#ere can be no ot#er conclusion but to #old Lim vicariouslyliable "it# Mendoza.

    T#is does not mean' #o"ever' t#at Lim is let "it#out any recourse

    a!ainst Enriuez and Mendoza. nder t#e civil la" principle o un(ust

    enric#ment' t#e re!istered o"ner o t#e motor ve#icle #as a ri!#t to be

    indemniied by t#e actual employer o t#e driver9 and under %rticle

    2181 o t#e Civil Code' "#oever pays or t#e dama!e caused by #is

    dependents or employees may recover rom t#e latter "#at #e #as paid

    or delivered in satisaction o t#e claim.

    Supplementary ;otes: