128. mariano mendoza and elvira lim v spouses leonora gomez
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/25/2019 128. Mariano Mendoza and Elvira Lim v Spouses Leonora Gomez
1/1
128. Mariano C. Mendoza and Elvira Lim vsSpouses Leonora and Gabriel Gomez
Topic: Liability o a re!istered o"ner o a ve#icle
$acts: %s a result o a ve#icular collision resultin! rom t#e driver&s
ne!li!ence' respondents suered p#ysical in(uries and t#e )suzu truc*
sustained e+tensive dama!es. ,ence' t#is case or dama!es.-espondents ar!ued t#at alt#ou!# t#e re!istered o"ner o t#e bus "as
Lim' t#e actual o"ner o t#e bus "as Cirilo Enriuez /Enriuez0' "#o
#ad t#e bus attac#ed "it# Mayamy Transportation Company /Mayamy
Transport0 under t#e socalled *abit system. -espondents t#en
impleaded bot# Lim and Enriuez.
)ssue: #o is liable3 #o is deemed as Mendoza&s /driver0 employer3 )s
it Enriuez' t#e actual o"ner o t#e bus or Lim' t#e re!istered o"ner o
t#e bus3
-ulin!:T#e re!istered o"ner is deemed t#e employer o t#e ne!li!ent driver'and is t#us vicariously liable under %rticle 2145' in relation to %rticle2186' o t#e Civil Code. T#e re!istered o"ner o t#e motor ve#icle is t#eemployer o t#e ne!li!ent driver' and t#e actual employer is consideredmerely as an a!ent o suc# o"ner. T#us' "#et#er t#ere is an employer7employee relations#ip bet"een t#e re!istered o"ner and t#e driver isirrelevant in determinin! t#e liability o t#e re!istered o"ner "#o t#ela" #olds primarily and directly responsible or any accident' in(ury ordeat# caused by t#e operation o t#e ve#icle in t#e streets and #i!#"ays
%s suc#' t#ere can be no ot#er conclusion but to #old Lim vicariouslyliable "it# Mendoza.
T#is does not mean' #o"ever' t#at Lim is let "it#out any recourse
a!ainst Enriuez and Mendoza. nder t#e civil la" principle o un(ust
enric#ment' t#e re!istered o"ner o t#e motor ve#icle #as a ri!#t to be
indemniied by t#e actual employer o t#e driver9 and under %rticle
2181 o t#e Civil Code' "#oever pays or t#e dama!e caused by #is
dependents or employees may recover rom t#e latter "#at #e #as paid
or delivered in satisaction o t#e claim.
Supplementary ;otes: