121207 hb golf7 en final

Upload: goce-vasilevski

Post on 14-Apr-2018

228 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    1/31

    The GolfEnvironmental Commendation

    Background Report

    Think Blue.

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    2/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background ReportEnvironmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    Table of Content

    The Life Cycle Assessment of the Golf . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

    1. The models assessed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4

    1.1. Objective and target group of the assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

    1.2. Function and functional unit of the vehicle systems assessed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

    1.3. Scope of assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

    1.4. Environmental impact assessment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

    1.5. Basis of data and data quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

    2. Model assumptions and ndings of the Life Cycle Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

    3. Results of the Life Cycle Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

    3.1. Results of the Life Cycle Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

    3.1.1. Diesel models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

    3.1.2. Petrol models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

    3.2. Comparison of Life Cycle Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

    3.2.1. Diesel models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

    3.2.2. Petrol models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

    4. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .23

    5. Certication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

    6. Environmental impact categories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

    Bibliography and list of sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

    List of abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

    List of tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

    List of tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

    Appendix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

    2

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    3/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    The Life Cycle Assessment of the Golf

    Volkswagens objective is to develop its vehicles and components in such a way that,

    in their entirety, they each present better environmental properties than their

    predecessors or the relevant reference models.

    Ever since 1996, Volkswagen has been using Life Cycle Inventories and/or Life Cycle

    Assessments to document the e nvironmental performance of its vehicles and

    technologies. Through these Environmental Commendations Volkswagen provides its

    customers, shareholders and other stakeholders inside and outside the company with

    detailed information about how it is making its products and production processes

    more environmentally compatible and what has been achieved in this respect. The

    Environmental Commendations are based on detailed Life Cycle Assessments (LCA)

    in accordance with ISO 14040/44, which are verified by independent experts, such as

    TV NORD. As part of an integrated product policy, in this way Volkswagen considers

    not only individual environmental aspects such as the driving emissions, but the

    entire product life cycle from production and use, right through to disposal in

    other words from cradle to grave.

    In this particular Environmental Commendation, Volkswagen presents the results of

    one such complete Life Cycle Assessment. In the diesel model category the 1.6 TDI

    BlueMotion Technology (77kW)1 is compared with its predecessor. For the petrol

    models the 1.2 TSI BlueMotion Technology (63 kW)2 is compared with the relevantpredecessor model. The main focus of the comparisons is on five environmental

    impact categories.

    1 4.6/3.3/3.8 l/100km (urban/highway/combined) 99g CO2/km (combined), energy efficiency class A2 5.9/4.2/4.9 l/100km (urban/highway/combined) 113g CO2/km (combined), energy efficiency class B

    3

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    4/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    1. The models assessed

    Volkswagens Environmental Commendation for the Golf describes and analyses the

    environmental impacts of selected Golf models. We have compared diesel and

    petrol-engined models from the current model range (Golf VII)3 with their respective

    predecessors (Golf VI). The results are based on Life Cycle Assessments drawn up in

    accordance with the standards DIN EN ISO 14040 [ISO 2009] and 14044. All the

    definitions and descriptions required for preparing these Life Cycle Assessments were

    drawn up in accordance with the standards mentioned above and are explained

    below.

    1.1. Objective and target group of the assessment

    Volkswagen has been conducting Life Cycle Assessments for over ten years to provide

    detailed information on the environmental impacts of vehicles and components for

    our customers, shareholders and other interested parties within and outside the

    company. The aim of this particular Life Cycle Assessment is to describe the environ-

    mental profiles of the current Golf models with diesel and petrol engines and

    compare them with their predecessors.

    To this end we compared the 1.6-litre TDI (77 kW)4 with its equally powerful successor,

    the new 1.6-litre TDI (77 kW)5. For the petrol-engined models we compared a model

    with a 1.2-litre TSI engine (63 kW)6 with its equally powerful predecessor, the 1.2-litre

    TSI (63 kW)7

    .

    1.2. Function and functional unit of the vehicle systems assessed

    The functional unit for the assessment was defined as the transportation of

    passengers in a five-seater vehicle over a total distance of 150,000 kilometres in the

    New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) with comparable utilisation characteristics such

    as performance (see technical data in Table 1).

    3 The current models represent the model range available when this Commendation went to print.

    4 4.5 l/100km (NEDC) 119 g CO2/km

    5 3.8 l/100km (NEDC) 99 g CO2/km6 4.9 l/100km (NEDC) 113 g CO2/km7 5.5 l/100km (NEDC) 129 g CO2/km

    4

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    5/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    Table 1: Technical data of vehicles assessed

    Golf VI1.2 TSI

    Golf VII1.2 TSI

    Golf VI1.6 TDI

    Golf VII1.6 TDI

    Engine capacity [cm3] 1197 1197 1598 1598

    Output [kW] 63 63 77 77

    Gearbox 5-speed manual 5-speed manual 5-speed manual 5-speed manual

    Fuel Petrol (Super) Petrol (Super) Diesel Diesel

    Emission standard Euro 5 Euro 5 Euro 5 Euro 5

    Maximum speed[km/h]

    178 179 189 192

    Acceleration0-100 km/h [s]

    12.3 11.9 11.3 10.7

    Maximum torque[Nm] at rpm

    160/ 1500 - 3500 160/1400-3500 250/1500-2500 250/1500-2750

    Unladen weight [kg]8 1,229 1,205 1,314 1,295

    Fuel tank capacity [l] approx. 55 approx. 50 approx. 55 approx. 50

    1.3. Scope of assessment

    The scope of the assessment was defined in such a way that all relevant processes and

    substances are considered and traced back to the furthest possible extent by

    modelling them at the level of elementary flows in accordance with ISO 14040. This

    means that only substances and energy flows taken directly from the environment or

    released into the environment without prior or subsequent treatment exceed the

    scope of the assessment. The only exceptions to this rule are the material fractions

    formed at the recycling stage.

    The vehicle manufacturing phase was modelled including all manufacturing and

    processing stages for all vehicle parts and components. The model includes all steps

    from the extraction of raw materials and the manufacture of semifinished products

    right through to assembly.

    As regards the vehicles se rvice li fe, the model includes all relevant processes from

    fuel production and delivery through to actual driving. The analysis of the fuel supply

    process includes shipment from the oilfield to the refinery, the refining process and

    8 Unladen weight with 68 kg driver, 7 kg luggage and fuel tank 90% full, determined in accordance with

    directive 92/21 EEC [EU 1992] as amended (04/2009).

    5

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    6/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    transportation from the refinery to the filling station. Vehicle maintenance is not

    included in the assessment as previous studies demonstrated that maintenance does

    not cause any significant environmental impacts [Schweimer and Roberg, 2001].

    The recycling phase has been modelled in accordance with the VW SiCon process. In

    contrast to conventional recycling approaches, this process allows non-metallic

    shredder residue to also be recycled and used as a substitute for primary raw

    materials. Using this process, approximately 95 percent of a car by weight can be

    recycled. [Krinke et al. 2005a].

    In this Life Cycle Assessment, no environmental credits were awarded for the

    secondary raw material obtained from the recycling process. Only the environmental

    impacts of the recycling processes required were included. This corresponds to a

    worst case assumption 9, since in reality secondary raw material from vehicle recycling

    is generally returned to the production cycle. This recycling and substitution of

    primary raw materials avoids the environmental impact of primary raw materialproduction.

    Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram indicating the scope of the Life Cycle Assessment.

    Europe was chosen as the reference area for all processes in the manufacture, service

    and recycling phases.

    9 Here the worst case is a set of most unfavourable model parameters of the recycling phase.

    Scope of assessment

    Recovery of energy andraw materials

    Production of raw material Production pipeline

    Transport rening

    Fuel supply

    RecyclingManufacturing Service life

    Production of materials

    Production of components

    CreditsMaintenance

    Fig. 1: Scope of the Life Cycle Assessment

    6

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    7/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    10 Information on this method can be found at http://cml.leiden.edu/software/data-cmlia.html#getting-and-

    using-the-database11A detailed description of the environmental impact categories applied can be found in Chapter 6:

    Environmental impact categories and on the internet at www.environmental-commendation.com.12 EU25 describes the economic area covered by the European Union up to 2007. Data records for the

    normalisation of all 27 European Union states or Europe as a geographical reference area were not

    available at the time the Life Cycle Assessment was drawn up.

    1.4. Environmental impact assessment

    The impact assessment is based on the latest version (November 2010) of a method

    developed at the University of Leiden in the Netherlands (CML methodology10)

    [Guine and Lindeijer 2002]. The assessment of environmental impact potentials in

    accordance with this method is based on recognised scientific models. A total of five

    environmental impact categories11 were identified as relevant and were then assessed

    in this study:

    eutrophicationpotential(EP)

    ozonedepletionpotential(ODP)

    photochemicalozonecreationpotential(POCP)

    globalwarmingpotentialforareferenceperiodof100years(GWP)

    acidificationpotential(AP)

    The above environmental impact categories were chosen because they are particular-

    ly important for the automotive sector, and are also regularly used in other automoti-

    ve-related Life Cycle Assessments [Schmidt et al. 2004; Krinke et al. 2005b]. An

    appraisal of the impacts of potentially toxic substances was not undertaken as the

    relevant scientific debate is still ongoing and consequently there is a lack of proven

    methods and approaches to normalisation.

    The environmental impacts determined in the Life Cycle Assessments are measured

    in different units. For instance, global warming potential is measured in CO2

    equivalents and acidification potential in SO2 equivalents (each in kilograms). In

    order to make them comparable, a normalisation process is also necessary. In this

    Life Cycle Assessment the results were normalised with reference to the average

    annual environmental impact caused by the European Economic Area (EU25)12 (see

    Table 2).

    Table 2: EU25 normalisation factors in line with CML 2001 11/2010 (in thousand metric tons) [PE International 2003]

    Environmental category Value Unit

    Eutrophication potential 12,822 kg PO4 equivalents

    Ozone depletion potential 87 kg R11 equivalents

    Photochemical ozone creation potential 8,241 kg C2H4 equivalents

    Global warming potential 4,883,200 kg CO2 equivalents

    Acidication potential 27,354 kg SO2 equivalents

    7

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    8/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    1.5. Basis of data and data qualityThe data used for preparing the Life Cycle Assessment can be subdivided into product

    dataandprocessdata.Productdatadescribestheproductitself,andamongother

    things includes:

    Informationonparts,quantities,weightsandmaterials

    Informationonfuelconsumptionandemissionsduringutilisation

    Informationonrecyclingvolumesandprocesses.

    Processdataincludesinformationonmanufacturingandprocessingstepssuchas

    the provision of electricity, the production of materials and semifinished goods,

    fabrication and the production of fuel and consumables. This information is either

    obtained from commercial databases or in specific cases (e.g. paintshop and final

    assembly) compiled by Volkswagen.

    This means that the data represent the materials, production and other processes as

    accurately as possible from a technological, temporal and geographical point of view.

    For the most part, published industrial data are used. In addition, current available

    data13 are used that relate to Europe. Where European data are not available, German

    data are used (e.g. for polyamide). For the various vehicles we always use the same

    data on upstream supply chains for energy sources and materials. This means that

    differences between the latest models and their predecessors are entirely due tochanges in component weights, material compositions, manufacturing processes at

    Volkswagen and driving emissions.

    The Life Cycle Assessment model for vehicle production was developed using

    Volkswagens slimLCI methodology14 [Koffler et al. 2007]. Vehicle parts lists were used

    as data sources for product data, and the weight and materials of each product were

    taken from the Volkswagen material information system (MISS). This information was

    then linked to the corresponding process data in the Life Cycle Assessment software

    GaBi.

    This normalisation allows statements to be made regarding the contribution of a

    product to total environmental impacts in Western Europe. The results can then be

    presented on a graph using the same scale. This approach also makes the results more

    comprehensible and allows environmental impacts to be compared.

    Table 2 shows the normalisation factors laid down in the CML methodology for the

    individual impact categories. In this context it must be pointed out that normalisati-

    on does not give any indication of the ecological relevance of a particular environ-

    mental impact, i.e. it does not imply any judgement on the significance of individual

    environmental impacts.

    13 The data used are sourced from the GaBi 5 database.14 Further information on the slimLCI methodology and on the preparation of Life Cycle Assessments at

    Volkswagen can be found on the internet at www.environmental-commendation.com.

    8

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    9/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    Material inputs, processing procedures and the selection of data in GaBi are standar-

    dised to the greatest possible extent, ensuring that the information provided by

    slimLCI is consistent and transparent. The slimLCI methodology not only ensures

    highly detailed modelling but also a high quality standard for LCA models.

    Further investigation of the methods applied was based on error estimation and

    sensitivity analysis for representative components. Various components (the fuel cap

    module and head restraint frame) of the Golf VII were examined. The weights of

    various materials used in the components were changed.

    Depending on the parameters revised, this led to a weight increase of the respective

    component by a factor of 1.5 to 3. In terms of global warming potential, this change in

    the component parameters resulted in a mean deviation of 0.07% per component for

    the manufacturing stage. Over the full life cycle, this equates to a deviation of 0.02%per component. For error estimation purposes, the calculated deviation was

    extrapolated to 100 components. If an error of this magnitude were to be assumed in

    the data record used and carried over into the LCA model, it would result in a 2%

    deviation in the total Life Cycle Assessment.

    In practice, the occurrence of such a deviation is minimised by an additional manual

    check of the component weights indicated in the parts list. Consequently, the slimLCI

    method is considered stable, as previous studies have already shown [Koffler 2007].

    For the modelling of the vehicles service life, representative data for upstream fuel

    supply chains are taken from the GaBi database. It is assumed that fuels used in

    Europe are transported over a distance of 200 kilometres on average.

    For the regulated emissions CO2, NOX and HC/NMHC, direct driving emissions for

    the vehicles assessed were modelled individually in line with fuel consumption in

    accordance with the Euro 5 emission standards (see Table 3 and Table 4).

    9

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    10/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    This model too represents a worst case assumption, since actual emissions are in

    some cases far below the applicable legal limits (see Table 4). This means that the

    regulated service-life emissions indicated in the graphs are higher than those that

    actually occur.

    Table 4: Fuel consumption and emissions of vehicles assessed

    Golf VI1.2 l TSI[63 kW]

    Golf VII1.2 l TSI[63 kW]

    Golf VI1.6 l TDI[77 kW]

    Golf VII1.6 l TDI[77 kW]

    Fuel Petrol (Super) Petrol (Super) Diesel Diesel

    Fuel consumption(urban/ highway/combined) [l/100km]*

    7.0/4.6/5.5 5.9/4.2/4.9 5.7/3.9/4.5 4.6/3.3/3.8

    Emission standard Euro 5 Euro 5 Euro 5 Euro 5

    Carbon dioxide emissions(combined) [g/km]

    129 113 119 99

    CO [g/km] 0.3164 0.3218 0.2298 0.1454

    HC [g/km] 0.0301 0.0394

    NMHC [g/km] 0.0253 0.0329

    NOx [g/km] 0.0231 0.0248 0.1622 0.1187

    HC + NOX [g/km] 0.1917 0.139

    Particulates [g/km] 0.00200 0.00021 0.00063 0.00028

    * Total average consumption (NEDC)

    Regulated emissions

    Petrol[g/km]

    Diesel[g/km]

    Carbon monoxide emissions (CO) 1.00 0.50

    Nitrogen oxide emissions (NOX) 0.06 0.18

    Hydrocarbon emissions (HC) 0.10

    davon NMHC 0.068

    NOX + HC Emissionen 0.23

    Partikel-Emissionen 0.005* 0.005

    Table 3: Emission limits in accordance with Euro 5

    * mit Direkteinspritzung

    10

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    11/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    15 In line with the provisions of the EU Fuel Quality Directive [EU 2009]. Even if the sulphur content were

    higher, the contribution of sulphur emissions during the vehicles service life would still remain negligible.16 Completeness, as defined by ISO 14040, must always be considered with reference to the objective of the

    investigation. In this case, completeness means that the main materials and processes have been reflected.

    Any remaining gaps in the data are unavoidable and apply equally to all the vehicles compared.

    The fuel consumption of the vehicles is also shown in Table 4. All consumption figures

    and emissions were determined on the basis of EU Directives 80/268/EEC and 70/220/

    EEC [EU 2001; EU 2004] and regulation 692/2008 [EU 2008] for type approval. They

    therefore correspond to the values presented to the German Federal Motor Transport

    Authority (Kraftfahrtbundesamt) for type approval. A sulphur content of 10 ppm15 was

    assumed for petrol.

    Vehicle recycling was modelled on the basis of data from the VW SiCon process and

    using representative data from the GaBi database.

    In sum, all information relevant to the aims of this study was collected and modelled

    with a sufficient degree of completeness16. The modelling of vehicle systems on the

    basis of vehicle parts lists ensures that the model is complete, especially with respectto the manufacturing phase. As the work processes required are automated to a great

    extent, any differences in the results are due solely to changes in product data and not

    to deviations in the modelling system.

    11

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    12/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    12

    2. Model assumptions and findings of the

    Life Cycle AssessmentAll the framework conditions and assumptions define d for the Life Cycle Assessment

    are outlined below.

    Table 5: Assumptions and denitions for the Life Cycle Assessment

    Aim of the Life Cycle Assessment

    Comparison of the environmental proles of predecessor and successor versions

    of selected Golf models with petrol and diesel engines

    Scope of assessment

    Function of systems

    Transport of passengers in a ve-seater car

    Functional unit

    Transport of passengers in a ve-seater car over a total distance of 150,000

    kilometres in the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC), with comparable

    utilisation characteristics (e.g. performance)

    Comparability

    Comparable performance gures

    Cars with standard equipment and ttings

    System limits

    The system limits include the entire life cycle of the cars (manufacture, service life

    and recycling phase).

    Cut-of criteria

    The assessment does not include maintenance or repairs

    No environmental impact credits are awarded for secondary raw materials

    produced Cut-o criteria applied in GaBi data records, as described in the software

    documentation (www.gabi-software.com)

    Explicit cut-o criteria, such as weight or relevance limits, are not applied

    Allocation

    Allocations used in GaBi data records, as described in the software documentati-

    on (www.gabi-software.com)

    No further allocations are used

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    13/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    Data basis

    Volkswagen vehicle parts lists Material and weight information from the Volkswagen Material Information

    System (MISS)

    Technical data sheets

    Technical drawings

    Emission limits (for regulated emissions) laid down in current EU legislation

    The data used comes from the GaBi database or was collected in cooperation with

    VW plants, suppliers or industrial partners

    Life Cycle Inventory results

    Life Cycle Inventory results include emissions of CO2, CO, SO2, NOX, NMVOC,

    CH4, as well as consumption of energy resources

    The impact assessment includes the environmental impact categories eutrophica-

    tion potential, ozone depletion potential, photochemical ozone creation potential,

    global warming potential for a reference period of 100 years and acidication

    potential

    Normalisation of the results

    Software

    Life Cycle Assessment software GaBi 5, and GaBi DfX Tool and

    slimLCI interface as support tools (Service Pack 20)

    Evaluation

    Evaluation of Life Cycle Inventory and impact assessment results, subdivided into

    life cycle phases and individual processes

    Comparisons of impact assessment results of the vehicles compared

    Interpretation of results

    13

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    14/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    Fig. 1 Life Cycle Inventory data for the Golf VI 1.6 TDI [77 kW] (predecessor model rounded values)

    Manufacture Fuel supply Driving emissions Recycling*

    Life Cycle Inventory

    Golf VI 1.6 l TDI [77 kW] (predecessor model)

    0

    Nitrogen oxides (NOX)

    Hydrocarbons (NMVOC)

    Methane (CH4)

    Primary energy demand

    20 % 40 % 60 % 80 % 100 %

    44 kg

    15.8 kg

    31 kg

    356 GJ

    Carbon dioxide (CO2)

    Carbon monoxide (CO)

    Sulphur dioxide (SO2)

    25.6 t

    110 kg

    34.5 kg

    *Presentation of recycling on the graph is not possiblebecause of the very low levels involved.

    3. Results of the Life Cycle Assessment

    3.1. Results of the Life Cycle Inventory

    The information in the life cycle inventories is divided into the three life cycle phases:

    manufacturing, service life and recycling. The service life is subdivided into the

    environmental impact caused by the upstream fuel supply chain and direct driving

    emissions. The contribution shown for recycling only indicates the impacts of

    recycling processes but does not include any environmental impact credits for

    secondary raw materials produced.

    3.1.1. Diesel models

    Fig. 2 clearly shows that the emissions of the predecessor model, the Golf VI 1.6 TDI 17,

    such as carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen oxides (NOX), are

    mainly generated during the service life of the car. In contrast, both methane (CH4)

    emissions and primary energy demand are dominated by the fuel supply phase from

    well to pump. As a result of the low sulphur content assumed for the fuel used, the

    manufacturing phase accounts for a substantial part of the overall sulphur dioxide

    (SO2) emissions. CO2 emissions over the entire life cycle of the Golf VI 1.6 TDI reach

    approximately 25.6 metric tons. The total energy demand amounts to 356 GJ.

    17 On account of new computation methods, the values shown may deviate from older graphs. The vehicle

    Life Cycle Inventories presented in this document are based on the latest records.

    14

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    15/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    Fig. 2 Life Cycle Inventory data for the Golf VI 1.6 TDI [77 kW] (predecessor model rounded values)

    In qualitative terms, the Life Cycle Inventory for the current Golf model with 1.6-litre

    engine show only slight differences (see Fig. 3). However, the lower energy demand

    and emissions compared with the predecessor model are clearly evident. Thus, the

    energy requirement for the new 1.6 TDI is reduced from 356 GJ to 315 GJ and CO2

    emissions are only 22.1 metric tons instead of 25.6 metric tons.

    3.1.2. Petrol models

    The next two graphs, Fig. 4 and 5, show the results of the Life Cycle Inventories for the

    two petrol-engined models assessed. It is evident that, for the petrol-engined cars, the

    proportion of the total environmental impact resulting from the manufacturing phase

    is less than for the diesel models. This is due to the fact that the production of

    petrol-engined models causes a lower environmental impact than that of diesel

    models in absolute terms.

    What also emerges is that owing to the higher fuel consumption of petrol-engined

    models, the service life accounts for a higher proportion of the total environmental

    impact.

    Manufacture Fuel supply Driving emissions Recycling*

    Life Cycle InventoryGolf VII 1.6 l TDI [77 kW]

    0 20 % 40 % 60 % 80 % 100 %

    42.7 kg

    14.9 kg

    28.3 kg

    315 GJ

    22.1 t

    106 kg31 kg

    * Presentation of recycling on the graph is not possiblebecause of the very low levels involved.

    Nitrogen oxides (NOX)

    Hydrocarbons (NMVOC)

    Methane (CH4)

    Primary energy demand

    Carbon dioxide (CO2)

    Carbon monoxide (CO)Sulphur dioxide (SO2)

    15

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    16/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    Fig. 4 Life Cycle Inventory data for the Golf VI 1.2 TSI [63 kW] (predecessor model, rounded values)

    Life Cycle InventoryGolf VI 1.2 l TSI [63 kW] (predecessor model)

    0 20 % 40 % 60 % 80 % 100 %

    29 kg

    20,9 kg

    38,6 kg

    394 GJ

    Nitrogen oxides (NOX)

    Hydrocarbons (NMVOC)

    Methane (CH4)

    Primary energy demand

    Carbon dioxide (CO2)

    Carbon monoxide (CO)

    Sulphur dioxide (SO2)

    29,4 t

    187 kg

    40,6 kg

    Manufacture Fuel supply Driving emissions Recycling*

    * Presentation of recycling on the graph is not possiblebecause of the very low levels involved.

    The predecessor model the Golf VI 1.2 TSI generates total CO2 emissions of 29.4

    metric tons and has a total energy demand of 394 GJ (see Fig. 4). The current model,

    also with a 1.2-litre TSI engine, generates 3.1 metric tons less CO2 emissions and also

    has significantly lower energy requirements of 362 GJ (see Fig. 5). This is a direct result

    of its lower fuel consumption compared with the predecessor model. The significant

    influence of the service life phase i.e. fuel supply and driving emissions on the final

    result means that the considerably reduced consumption also leads to a reduction in

    all the other Life Cycle Inventory parameters.

    Fig. 5 Life Cycle Inventory data for the Golf VII 1.2 TSI [63 kW] (rounded values)

    Life Cycle InventoryGolf VII 1.2 l TSI [63 kW]

    0 20 % 40 % 60 % 80 % 100 %

    27.2 kg

    20 kg

    36.4 kg

    362 GJ

    26.3 t

    182 kg

    35.6 kg

    Manufacture Fuel supply Driving emissions Recycling*

    * Grasche Darstellung der Verwertung aufgrunddes sehr geringen Niveaus nicht mglich.

    Nitrogen oxides (NOX)

    Hydrocarbons (NMVOC)

    Methane (CH4)

    Primary energy demand

    Carbon dioxide (CO2)

    Carbon monoxide (CO)

    Sulphur dioxide (SO2)

    16

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    17/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    18 Information on the environmental impact categories used here can be found on the internet at

    www.environmental-commendation.com

    3.2. Comparison of Life Cycle Impacts

    On the basis of the Life Cycle Inventory data, Life Cycle Impact Assessments are

    drawn up for all the environmental impact categories described. The interactions of

    all the emissions recorded are considered and potential environmental impacts are

    determined based on scientific models18.

    3.2.1. Diesel models

    Fig. 6 clearly shows that the current model achieves improvements over its predeces-

    sorinalmostalltheenvironmentalcategoriesconsidered.TheonlyexceptionisODP

    which shows no demonstrable change from a full life cycle perspective.

    In general, with reference to overall environmental impacts in the European Union,

    Fig. 6 clearly shows that the vehicles considered here make their largest contributionsinthecategoriesofglobalwarming,acidificationandphotochemicalozonecreation

    potential.Contributionstothecategorieseutrophicationandozonedepletion

    potentialaresmaller.Theozonedepletionpotentialinparticularissolowthatitcan

    hardly be represented on the chart. Also, eutrophication potential is a less important

    indicator for the automobile industry, being of real significance for the agricultural

    sector and the chemical industry. Consequently, the notes below focus on the

    findings for the first three environmental impact categories.

    Comparative Life Cycle Impactsnormalised

    6.00E-09

    5.00E-09

    4.00E-09

    3.00E-09

    Global warmingpotentialCO2 equivalents [t]

    Photochemical ozonecreation potentialC2H4 equivalents [kg]

    AcidicationpotentialSO2 equivalents [kg]

    Ozone depletionpotentialR11 equivalents [g]

    EutrophicationpotentialPO4 equivalents [kg]

    2.00E-09

    1.00E-09

    0.00E+00

    22.2

    68.4

    0.4* 0.4*

    8 7.6

    8.37.8

    62.9

    * Presentation of the normalised values on the graph isnot possible because of the very low levels involved.

    Golf VI 1.6 l TDI [77 kW] (predecessor model)

    Golf VII 1.6 l TDI [77 kW]

    Fig. 6: Comparison of the environmental impacts of the Golf VI 1.6 TDI [77 kW] (predecessor) and the Golf VII 1.6 TDI [77 kW]

    (absolute values, rounded)

    25.7

    17

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    18/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    Fig. 7: Environmental impacts of the Golf VI 1.6 TDI (predecessor) and the Golf VII 1.6 TDI (relative values, rounded)

    Comparative Life Cycle Impacts in detailnormalised

    6.00E-09

    5.00E-09

    4.00E-09

    3.00E-09

    2.00E-09

    1.00E-09

    0.00E+00

    Global warmingpotentialCO2 equivalents [t]

    Photochemical ozone creationpotentialC2H4 equivalents [kg]

    AcidicationpotentialSO2 equivalents [kg]

    Recycling*

    Driving emissions

    Manufacture

    -7 %

    -8 %

    -13 %

    Golf VI 1.6 l TDI [77 kW] (predecessor model)

    Golf VII 1.6 l TDI [77 kW]

    As Fig. 7 below shows, the environmental impacts of the current Golf 1.6 TDI are lower

    than those of the predecessor model in all three categories considered. The reduction

    of 13 percent in global warming potential for the new Golf 1.6 TDI corresponds to

    savings of around 3.4 metric tons of CO2 equivalents. In relation to photochemical

    ozonecreationandacidificationpotential,however,thesavingsaresomewhatlower.

    Fig. 7 also indicates how the specific reductions are achieved, in that the absolute

    environmental impacts are allocated to the individual life cycle phases. As alreadyshown by the Life Cycle Inventories, the most relevant changes occur during the

    service life of the vehicle and as a result of the corresponding impact on fuel produc-

    tion. Most of the improvements therefore result either directly (lower driving

    emissions) or indirectly (less fuel production) from lower fuel consumption.

    * Presentation of the recycling phase on the graph isnot possible because of the very low levels involved.

    18

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    19/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    Fig. 8 shows the environmental impacts described in relation to each other and over

    the entire life cycle of the vehicles. The relations between manufacture, service life

    and recycling with regard to the individual environmental impacts are clearly visible.

    Global warming potential in particular is influenced mainly by vehicle use (highest

    increase over service life).

    Acidificationandphotochemicalozonecreationpotential ,bycontrast,aredistribut-

    ed more evenly over all the phases of the life cycle. This is explained by the identical

    emissions standards applicable to the two vehicles compared.

    Fig. 8: Comparison of environmental impacts over the full life cycle diesel models (rounded values)

    Comparison of environmental impacts over the full life cyclenormalised

    Manufacture Service life [150,000 km] Recycling

    Global warming

    Acidication

    Photochemical ozone creation

    Golf VI 1.6 l TDI [77 kW] (predecessor model)

    Golf VII 1.6 l TDI [77 kW]

    6.00E-09

    5.00E-09

    4.00E-09

    3.00E-09

    2.00E-09

    1.00E-09

    0.00E+00

    19

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    20/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    3.2.2. Petrol models

    A comparison of the petrol vehicles also shows that the current model represents an

    improvement over its predecessor in all impact categories (see Fig. 9). Here too, the

    greatest potential environmental impacts are in the areas of global warming,

    acidificationandphotochemicalozonecreation.

    Fig. 9: Comparison of the environmental impacts of the Golf VI 1.2 TSI (predecessor) and the Golf VII 1.2 TSI

    (absolute values, rounded)

    Comparative Life Cycle Impactsnormalised

    7.00E-09

    6.00E-09

    5.00E-09

    4.00E-09

    3.00E-09

    Global warmingpotentialCO2 equivalents [t]

    Photochemical ozonecreation potentialC2H4 equivalents [kg]

    AcidicationpotentialSO2 equivalents [kg]

    Ozone depletionpotentialR11 equivalents [g]

    EutrophicationpotentialPO4 equivalents [kg]

    2.00E-09

    1.00E-09

    0.00E+00

    25.9

    64.7

    0.4* 0.4*

    5.1 4.8

    11.1 10.4

    57.8

    * Presentation of the normalised values on the graph isnot possible because of the very low levels involved.

    Golf VI 1.2 l TSI [63 kW] (predecessor model)

    Golf VII 1.2 l TSI [63 kW]

    29

    Over its entire life cycle, the global warming potential of the Golf VII 1.2 TSI is

    significantly lower than that of the predecessor model. Overall, for the assumed

    distance driven of 150,000 kilometres, greenhouse gas emissions show a reduction of

    3.1 metric tons of CO2 equivalents per vehicle.

    Fig. 10 indicates the changes in environmental impacts between the Golf VI 1.2 TSI

    anditssuccessor.Thediagramshowsthatphotochemicalozonecreationpotentialis

    reduced by 6 percent and acidification potential by 11 percent for the Golf VII 1.2 TSI.

    Global warming potential over the entire life cycle is also reduced by 11 percent.

    20

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    21/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    Figures 10 and 11 indicate the sources of these changes in detail. As with the diesel

    models, the lower fuel consumption of the current model i.e. the sum of direct

    exhaust emissions during the service life and the indirect emissions from the fuel

    production and supply chain is the main factor in reducing the environmental

    impact of the current model. At the manufacturing phase there are only slight

    deviations in favour of the Golf VII. The benefits in terms of acidification and

    photochemicalozonecreationpotentialarealsoduetothelowerfuelconsumptionof

    the current model and the associated reduced environmental impact of fuel produc-

    tion.

    21

    Fig. 10: Environmental impacts of the Golf VI 1.2 TSI and the Golf VII 1.2 TSI (relative values, rounded)

    Comparative Life Cycle Impacts in detailnormalised

    6.00E-09

    5.00E-09

    7.00E-09

    4.00E-09

    3.00E-09

    2.00E-09

    1.00E-09

    0.00E+00

    Global warmingpotentialCO2 equivalents [t]

    Photochemical ozone creationpotentialC2H4 equivalents [kg]

    AcidicationpotentialSO2 equivalents [kg]

    Recycling*

    Driving emissions

    Manufacture

    -6 %

    -11 %

    -11%

    Golf VI 1.2 l TSI [63 kW] (predecessor model)

    Golf VII 1.2 l TSI [63 kW]

    * Presentation of the recycling phase on the graph isnot possible because of the very low levels involved.

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    22/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    Comparison of environmental impacts over the full life cyclenormalised

    Manufacture Service life [150,000 km] Recycling

    6.00E-09

    7.00E-09

    4.00E-09

    5.00E-09

    3.00E-09

    2.00E-09

    1.00E-09

    0.00E+00

    Global warming

    Acidication

    Photochemical ozone creation

    Fig. 11: Comparison of environmental impacts over the full life cycle petrol models (rounded values)

    Golf VI 1.2 l TSI [63 kW] (predecessor model)

    Golf VII 1.2 l TSI [63 kW]

    22

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    23/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    4. Conclusion

    One thing that soon becomes clear when considering the Life Cycle Assessment of the

    new Golf is that, compared to its predecessor, the current Golf presents improve-

    ments in all the environmental impact categories considered and for the most part

    these improvements are very significant. The most extensive progress here is made in

    the areas with the most relevant environmental impacts in volume terms, i.e.

    acidification,photochemicalozonecreationpotentialandglobalwarmingpotential.

    The improvements in the new Golf are particularly noticeable in terms of global

    warming potential.

    Intheeutrophicationandozonedepletionpotentialimpactcategoriestoothereare

    measurable reductions, although their potential for reduction is substantially lower

    than in the three impact categories mentioned above. The models assessed have very

    littleimpactoneutrophicationandozonedepletion.Overthefulllifecycle,the

    vehicles emit the following volumes of carbon dioxide equivalents:

    Golf 1.2 TSI BlueMotion Technology: 25.9 metric tons;

    Golf 1.6 TDI BlueMotion Technology: 22.2 metric tons.

    Furthermore, the improvements are largely attributable to a reduction in fuel

    consumption and the resultant drop in driving emissions as well as the reduced

    environmental impact at the fuel production stage. The drop in fuel consumption inthe Golf is a direct result of more efficient engines and a lower unladen weight. This in

    turn makes itself felt at the production stage where, compared to the Golf VI, less

    resources and materials are required for the manufacture of the Golf VII, leading to

    lower environmental impacts.

    As a result, the Life Cycle Assessment of the new Golf shows a marked improve ment

    over that of its predecessor. In terms of global warming potential, over its full life

    cycle the 1.6 TDI BlueMotion Technology achieves savings of 13 percent. This is due to

    a 3 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions at the manufacturing stage and a

    17 percent reduction during the vehicles service life.

    Similarly, over its full life cycle the Golf 1.2 TSI BlueMotion Technology achieves

    savings of 11 percent. This is due to a 4 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions

    at the manufacturing stage and an 11 percent reduction during the vehicles service

    life

    In sum, therefore, Volkswagen has achieved its aim of making technical progress in

    the new models and at the same time making them more environmentally compati-

    ble.

    23

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    24/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    5. Certification

    The statements made for the Golf Environmental Commendation are supported by

    the Life Cycle Assessment of the Golf. The certificate of validity confirms that the Life

    Cycle Assessment is based on reliable data and that the method used to compile it

    complies with the requirements of ISO standards 14040 and 14044.

    The detailed report of TV NORD can be found in the appendix.

    24

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    25/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    Eutrophication potentialdescribes excessive input of nutrients into

    water [or soil], which can lead to an undesir-

    able change in the composition of flora and

    fauna. A secondary effect of the over-fertilisa-

    tion of water is oxygen consumption and

    therefore oxygen deficiency. The reference

    substance for eutrophication is phosphate

    (PO4), and all other substances that impact onthis process (for instance NOX, NH 3) are

    measured in phosphate equivalents.

    Ozone depletion potentialdescribes the ability of trace gases to rise into

    thestratosphereanddepleteozonethereina

    catalytic process. Halogenated hydrocarbons

    in particular are involved in this depletion

    process, which diminishes or destroys the

    protectivefunctionofthenaturalozonelayer.

    Theozonelayerprovidesprotectionagainst

    excessive UV radiation and therefore against

    genetic damage or impairment of photosyn-

    thesis in plants. The reference substance for

    ozonedepletionpotentialisR11,andallother

    substances that impact on this process (for

    instance CFC, N2O) are measured in R11

    equivalents.

    FCKW NOX

    Stratosphere(15 - 50 km)

    UV radiation

    Ozone depletion potential

    Eutrophication potential

    NOX

    NO3 NH4PO4

    NH3

    Air pollutants

    Wastewater

    6. Environmental impact categories

    25

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    26/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    Photochemical ozone creationpotentialdescribes the formation of photooxidants,

    suchasozone,PAN,etc.,whichcanbeformed

    from hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide (CO)

    and nitrogen oxides (NOX), in conjunction

    withsunlight.Photooxidantscanimpair

    human health and the functioning of

    ecosystems and damage plants. The reference

    substance for the formation of photochemical

    ozoneisethene,andallothersubstancesthat

    impact on this process (for instance VOC, NOX

    and CO) are measured in ethene equivalents.

    Global warming potentialdescribes the emissions of greenhouse gases,

    which increase the absorption of heat from

    solar radiation in the atmosphere and

    therefore increase the average global

    temperature. The reference substance for

    global warming potential is CO2, and all other

    substances that impact on this process (for

    instance CH4, N2O, SF6 and VOC) are

    measured in carbon dioxide equivalents.

    Acidication potentialdescribes the emission of acidifying sub-

    stances such as SO2 and NOX, etc., which have

    diverse impacts on soil, water, e cosystems,

    biological organisms and material (e.g.buildings). Forest dieback and fish mortality

    in lakes are examples of such negative effects.

    The reference substance for acidification

    potential is SO2, and all other substances that

    impact on this process (for instance NOX and

    NH3) are measured in sulphur dioxide

    equivalents.

    UV radiation

    Infrared radiation

    Reection

    CO2 CH4 FCKW

    Photochemical ozone creation potential

    Dry warm weather

    Hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides

    OZONE

    Hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides

    Photochemical ozone creation potential

    26

    Acidication potential

    Acid rain

    HNO3H2SO4 NOX

    SO2

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    27/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    Bibliography and list of sources

    [EU 1992] 92/21/EEC European Union: Council Directive on the masses and dimensions of motor

    vehicles of category M1.

    [EU 2001] 80/1268/EEC European Union: Council Directive relating to the fuel consumption of

    motor vehicles. Brussels: European Union.

    [EU 2004] 70/220/EEC European Union: Council Directive relating to measures to be taken

    against air pollution by gases from positive-ignition engines of motor vehicles. Brussels:European Union.

    [EU 2008] COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 692/2008 of 18 July 2008 implementing andamending Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles

    (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information.

    [EU 2009] DIRECTIVE 2009/30/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of

    23 April 2009 amending Directive 98/70/EC as regards the specication of petrol, diesel and gas-oil and introducing a mechanism to monitor and reduce greenhouse gas emissions and amending

    Council Directive 1999/32/EC as regards the specication of fuel used by inland waterway vesselsand repealing Directive 93/12/EEC

    [Guine und Lindeijer 2002] Guine, J. B.; Lindeijer, E.: Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment: Ope-

    rational guide to the ISO standards. Dordrecht [u.a.]: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    [ISO 2009] International Organization for Standardization: ISO 14040: Environmental Manage-

    ment Life Cycle Assessment Principles and Framework. 2nd edition. Geneva: International Orga-

    nization for Standardization.

    [Koer 2007] Koer, C.: Automobile Produnkt-kobilanzierungWolfsburg/Darmstadt: Volkswagen AG, Technische Universitt Darmstadt. Dissertation.

    [Koer et al. 2007] Koer, C.; Krinke, S.; Schebek, L.; Buchgeister, J.: Volkswagen slimLCI aprocedure for streamlined inventory modelling within Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of vehicles. In:International Journal of Vehicle Design (Special Issue on Sustainable Mobility, Vehicle Design andDevelopment). Olney: Inderscience Publishers.

    [Krinke et al. 2005a] Krinke, S.; Bossdorf-Zimmer, B.; Goldmann, D.: kobilanz Altfahrzeug-recycling Vergleich des VW-SiCon-Verfahrens und der Demontage von Kunststobauteilen mitnachfolgender werkstoicher Verwertung. Wolfsburg: Volkswagen AG. On the internet atwww.volkswagen-umwelt.de.

    [Krinke et al. 2005b] Krinke, S.; Nannen, H.; Degen, W.; Homann, R.; Rudlo, M.; Baitz, M.:SunDiesel a new promising biofuel for sustainable mobility. Presentation at the 2nd Life-CycleManagement Conference Barcelona.

    On the internet at www.etseq.urv.es/aga/lcm2005/99_pdf/ Documentos/AE12-2.pdf.

    [PE International 2012] PE International GmbH: GaBi 5.0 database documentation. Leinfelden-

    Echterdingen: PE International GmbH.

    [Schmidt et al. 2004] Schmidt, W. P.; Dahlquist, E.; Finkbeiner, M.; Krinke, S.; Lazzari, S.; Oschmann,

    D.; Pichon, S.; Thiel, C.: Life Cycle Assessment of Lightweight and End-Of-Life Scenarios for GenericCompact Class Vehicles. In: International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (6), pp. 405-416.

    [Schweimer et al. 1999] Schweimer, G. W.; Bambl, T.; Wolfram, H.: Sachbilanz des SEAT Ibiza.Wolfsburg: Volkswagen AG.

    [Schweimer und Roberg 2001] Schweimer, G. W.; Roberg, A.: Sachbilanz des SEAT Leon.Wolfsburg: Volkswagen AG.

    27

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    28/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    List of abbreviations

    AP Acidication Potenzial

    CH4 Methane

    CML Centrum voor Milieukunde Leiden (Centre for Environmental Sciences, Netherlands)

    CO Carbon monoxide

    CO2 Carbon dioxide

    DIN Deutsche Industrienorm (German Industrial Standard)

    EN European standard

    EP Eutrophication Potential

    GJ Gigajoule

    GWP Global Warming Potential

    HC Hydrocarbons

    KBA Kraftfahrtbundesamt (Federal Motor Transport Authority)

    kW Kilowatt

    LCA Life Cycle Assessment

    LCI Life Cycle Inventory

    MISS Material Information System

    NEDC New European Driving Cycle

    Nm Newton metre

    NMVOC Non-methane volatile organic compounds (hydrocarbons without methane)

    NOX Nitrogen oxides

    ODP Ozone Depletion PotentialPOCP Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential

    ppm parts per million

    PVC Polyvinyl chlorid

    R11 Trichloruormethane (CCl3F)

    SO2 Sulphur dioxide

    TDI Turbocharged direct injection diesel engine

    TSI Direkteinspritzende turboaufgeladene Ottomotoren

    VDA Verband der Automobilindustrie e.V. (Association of the German Automotive Industry)

    VOC Volatile Organic Compounds

    28

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    29/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    List of Figures

    List of Tables

    Table 1: Technical data of vehicles assessed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5Table 2: EU25 normalisation factors in line with CML 2001 11/2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7

    Table 3: Emission limits in accordance with Euro 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10

    Table 4: Fuel consumption and emissions of vehicles assessed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10

    Table 5: Assumptions and denitions for the Life Cycle Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12

    Fig. 1: Scope of the Life Cycle Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

    Fig. 1 Life Cycle Inventory data for the Golf VI 1.6 TDI [77 kW] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

    Fig. 2 Life Cycle Inventory data for the Golf VI 1.6 TDI [77 kW] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

    Fig. 4 Life Cycle Inventory data for the Golf VI 1.2 TSI [63 kW] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

    Fig. 5 Life Cycle Inventory data for the Golf VII 1.2 TSI [63 kW]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

    Fig. 6: Comparison of the environmental impacts of the Golf VI 1.6 TDI [77 kW] (predecessor)

    and the Golf VII 1.6 TDI [77 kW]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

    Fig. 7: Environmental impacts of the Golf VI 1.6 TDI (predecessor) and the Golf VII 1.6 TDI. . 18

    Fig. 8: Comparison of environmental impacts over the full life cycle diesel models . . . . . . . 19

    Fig. 9: Comparison of the environmental impacts of the Golf VI 1.2 TSI (predecessor) and the

    Golf VII 1.2 TSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

    Fig. 10: Environmental impacts of the Golf VI 1.2 TSI and the Golf VII 1.2 TSI . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

    Fig. 11: Comparison of environmental impacts over the full life cycle petrol models . . . . . . 22

    29

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    30/31

    Environmental Commendation Golf - Background Report

    Appendix

    30

  • 7/27/2019 121207 Hb Golf7 en Final

    31/31

    Volkswagen AG

    Group Research Environment

    Aairs Product

    P.O. Box 011/1774

    38436 Wolfsburg

    Germany

    01 October 2012

    www.volkswagen.com