110019101-jialin li-critical literature review-international entrepreneurship
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/31/2019 110019101-Jialin Li-Critical Literature Review-International Entrepreneurship
1/12
1
Critical Literature Review of the Role of the Entrepreneur in the Early
Internationalization of Small Firms
Contents
1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1
2. The Role of Entrepreneur in Small Firms ....................................................................................... 2
3. The Influence of Entrepreneurs Psychological Traits on Decision-making................................... 4
4. The Influence of Entrepreneurs Cognition on Decision-making ................................................... 6
5. Conclusion....................................................................................................................................... 8
References............................................................................................................................................... 9
1. Introduction
This paper aims to study the role of entrepreneur in the early internationalization of
small firms in in terms of analysing the influence on decision-making process from
managerial motivations, behaviour and attitudes. First of all, it is necessary to clarify what
is the internationalization of small firms. There are two similar internationalization paths
for SMEs pointed out by researchers (Jones, 1999; Andersen et al., 1997; Madsen and
Servais, 1997). One is the traditional incremental approach to internationalisation, and the
other is the more recent school of international entrepreneurship (McDougall and Oviatt,
2000).
Empirical researches proved that there are connections between decision making
and the internationalization of SMEs. The traditional incremental approach is based on
the Uppsala model developed by Johanson and Vahlne (1977) who explained that
-
7/31/2019 110019101-Jialin Li-Critical Literature Review-International Entrepreneurship
2/12
2
internationalization of SMEs is a process of slow, incremental and decision making that
would gradually increase the market power of firms. According to the model, individuals
and groups are playing significant role of decision-making by analysis and interpretation
and decisions are regarded as being dictated by the learning process (Lundberg 1995,
Andersson 2000, Blomstermo and Deo-Sharma 2003). Besides, Entrepreneurship is
recognized as a learning process which suggests that the perspective of the
entrepreneurial learning might contribute to the internationalization discourse (Minniti
and Bygrave 2001, Cope 2005, Rae and Carswell, 2001). The entire organization would
be affected by the decisions made by entrepreneurs through individual level learning and
organizational behaviour (Oviatt and Mcdougall 2005, Acedo and Florin 2006).
There is an argument explaining that the characteristics of decision-maker have not
been explored intensively enough (Bonaccorsi, 1992). That is to say the influence of the
entrepreneur on decision-making in the process of internationalization needs further study.
Therefore, this paper attempts to analyse the role of entrepreneur on decision-making of
small firm in internationalization.
2. The Role of Entrepreneur in Small Firms
Since the definition of entrepreneur and managers is always mixed, Begley and Boyd
(1987) pointed out that the lack of distinction of entrepreneur from manager. In order to
differentiate the distinction between entrepreneur and manager, some researchers defined
the term ofentrepreneur to mean a person who has founded his or her own enterprise
(Begley & Boyd, 1987, p. 100). Also, another researcher Bygrave (1989) commented that
-
7/31/2019 110019101-Jialin Li-Critical Literature Review-International Entrepreneurship
3/12
3
the conception of entrepreneurship is an emerging paradigm which is still in the pre-
theory stage and needed to be further developed.
Many researchers make different definitions of the roles of the entrepreneur
according to different theories of economics. Firstly, the entrepreneur acts as a co-
ordinator. Connell (1999) defines that the role of the entrepreneur is a combiner and
coordinator of productive resources. Connell (1999) also viewed that the entrepreneur
plays a role in the core of market system because he or she build the links between the
producer and consumer in communication. Besides, Casson (1982) argued that the
entrepreneur should be regarded as the fourth factor of production in his analysis.
Secondly, the entrepreneur plays a role as arbitrageur. This views of regarding the
entrepreneur as arbitrageur originates from Kirzner (1973), who argued that the
entrepreneur has the capability to identify profitable opportunities for organizations. The
arbitrageur attempts to seize the opportunity to sell the service and product at a
competitive price in the market. But there is another argument in contrast with Kirzners
view that the entrepreneur motivates the market toward equilibrium (Schumpeter, 1934).
Thirdly, the entrepreneur acts as an innovator of the organization. Drucker (1985) points
out that entrepreneurship should be acknowledged as an act of innovation that could add a
new wealth-producing capability to existing resources. Similarly, Schumpeter (1934) the
entrepreneur is the innovator who implements changes in the market and the entrepreneur
moves the market from equilibrium. Furthermore, the entrepreneur is also interpreted as
an uncertainty-bearer. Since the small firm is new to step into internationalization, the
entrepreneur who leads the organization towards internationalization should be
responsible for bearing the risk of the presence of uncertainty (Casson, 1982).
In summarizing the above types of roles the entrepreneur might act in the
internationalization of small firms, the following functions could be perceived as the
-
7/31/2019 110019101-Jialin Li-Critical Literature Review-International Entrepreneurship
4/12
4
entrepreneur. First, the entrepreneur is responsible to seize market opportunities for the
organization. And he or she should use the current resources into new production
combinations. Besides, the entrepreneur also becomes the owner-manager who operates
the organization and manages the assets to the best of the venture. Finally, the
entrepreneur has to take the risk of suffering market uncertainty that might bring loss and
failure to the organization. Casson (1982) made a supplement to the definition of
entrepreneur that he thought there is no difference between the manager in a company and
the entrepreneur because the key criterion is the judgement in decision making. In the
next section, the impact of the entrepreneur in decision making would be discussed.
3. The Influence of Entrepreneurs Psychological Traits on Decision-making
After explaining the different roles the entrepreneur would act in the international
business, this section would attempt to discuss the impact of the entrepreneur on decision
making.
In terms of managerial motivation, behaviour and attitudes, whether the entrepreneur
is proactive in operating the organization and managing business or not would influence
the development of a firm. Some research argues that the proactivity of entrepreneur
would motivate the entire company to develop more rapidly through identifying and
perceiving better opportunities and the decision makers are more willing to make internal
changes in order to gain further development (Kickul and Gundry, 2002). As the
entrepreneur or the executive managers who are responsible for making decisions, being
proactive seem to be the motivation for small firms to gain rapid development. In the
perspective of entrepreneurs proactivity, the literature on international entrepreneurship
(McDougall and Oviatt, 2000) and the empirical studies on the mindset of managers in
-
7/31/2019 110019101-Jialin Li-Critical Literature Review-International Entrepreneurship
5/12
5
global business support the assumption that it is a characteristic of entrepreneur who act
proactively in managing global business (Nummela et al, 2002).
Simonsson (2002) explained that entrepreneurs management plays a significant role
in internal communication, without which correct decision is not possible to be made by
entrepreneur. When developing the international business of small firms, the internal
communication channels would be important because it would have directly impact on
the efficiency and effectiveness of the company. That means the owner-managers or the
entrepreneurs of small firms should be capable to have the competence to build
participation and use rhetoric to motivate their employees. For instance, it is owner-
managers responsibility to create trust among employees since every decision being
made should be correctly interpreted within a firm and this results from the good
leadership in management (Misztal, 1998).
In smaller organizations knowledge tends to be individualized to the entrepreneur or
concentrated in a small group of people, who are close to the decision-making process
(Oviatt and McDougall, 2005). Thus, the personal characteristics of the entrepreneur in
psychology need to be analysed specifically.
First of all, Shaver and Scott (1991) discover that the achievement motivation is the
initial desire of the entrepreneur to start his or her business. By starting new business, the
entrepreneur would be aggressive in gaining achievement. McClelland (1961) defines that
the entrepreneur pursues achievement which is regarded as preference for challenge,
personal responsibility acceptance for outcomes and innovativeness. But the empirical
study carried out by Brockhaus (1980) discovered that there was a high failure rate of the
entrepreneur who was too aggressive and drove for achievement.
Secondly, the entrepreneur strives for the independence and the control upon different
situations (Hornaday and Aboud, 1971). That means the strong desire of being
-
7/31/2019 110019101-Jialin Li-Critical Literature Review-International Entrepreneurship
6/12
6
independent and demonstration of self-capability is the significant characteristic of the
entrepreneurs psychology (McGrath et al., 1992).
Furthermore, the desire for pursuing independence would lead to individualism of the
entrepreneur. And this trait of the entrepreneur might do harm to the organization as he or
she is so self-centred and make decisions without considering others advice or
suggestion. Hofstedes (1980) found that high individualism is linked to emphasis on
individual initiative and achievement.
In addition, there are literatures on entrepreneurial behaviour explaining that the
entrepreneur tends to be optimistic in global business environment and make decisions
according to subjective factors (Cooper et al., 1988). However, this kind of psychological
trait is likely to bring serious damage or failure to the organization and its business.
4. The Influence of Entrepreneurs Cognition on Decision-making
Apart from discussing the psychological traits of entrepreneur, this section would
study the cognition of entrepreneurs in how they think in operating organizations and
decision making. Busenitz and Barney (1997) found that entrepreneurs could be
differentiated from managers through making decisions by basing on individual biases
and heuristics. Thus, some of the literature related to the entrepreneurial cognitive biases
would be discussed in the following paragraph.
Firstly, emotions are significantly contributing to the influence on entrepreneurs
decision-making process. Forgas (1995) presents that the emotional biases in
entrepreneurial way of thinking is the affect infusion model which suggests that affective
states created by one source of experience is able to infuse judgement about other
unrelated events. Also, the likelihood of affect infusion is higher when entrepreneurs
-
7/31/2019 110019101-Jialin Li-Critical Literature Review-International Entrepreneurship
7/12
7
engage in effortful thought (Forgas, 1995). Thus, Baron (1998) made a hypothesis that
entrepreneurial decisions are of high susceptibility to affect infusion.
Secondly, Bandura (1986) defined that self-efficacy is an personal cognitive estimate
of a persons capabilities to mobilise the motivation, cognitive resources and courses of
action needed to exercise control upon events in his or her life. The people who with high
self-efficacy would regard the environment as full of opportunities while those who with
low self-efficacy would think the same environment to be burdened with costs and risks
(Chen et al., 1998). Besides, Brockhaus (1980) pointed out that self-efficacy represents a
serious bias since it leads to the wrong perception of the low possibility of failure.
Thirdly, the overconfidence of the entrepreneur would also leave impact on decision-
making. This is because the overconfidence of entrepreneurs shows the possibility to
overestimate the likely occurrence of a series of events (Zacharakis and Shepherd, 2001).
The people who are overconfident prefer to make judgement or decision based on their
subjective acknowledgement and ideas but not tend to predict the potential risks of failure.
Levander and Raccuia (2001) argued that entrepreneurs are more frequently found to
have higher degree of self-confidence than general population. Therefore, due to the
overconfidence, entrepreneurs are more susceptible to make decisions with uncertain
risks.
Finally, Baron (1998) claims that most individuals would attribute positive
outcomes to internal causes of their own talent and effort, but attribute negative results to
external causes. This kind of self-serving bias is more likely popular among unsuccessful
entrepreneurs because they are not able to analyse the objective reasons that contribute to
failure and success.
In conclusion, several common cognitive biases in entrepreneurial decision-making
have been discussed. Low and McMillan (1988) pointed out that these differences
-
7/31/2019 110019101-Jialin Li-Critical Literature Review-International Entrepreneurship
8/12
8
between entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs need further empirical testing. However,
the results of the current empirical study support that the cognitive issues above might
influence the decision-making process to some extent
.
5. Conclusion
Therefore, after studying the role of the entrepreneur in the internationalization of small
firms, it is necessary to conclude that the decision-making is a crucial characteristic of the
entrepreneurial activity. This paper first delivered an introduction of the two paths of
internationalization of small firms, and then studied the different roles that entrepreneurs
would act in managing and operating the organization in international business.
Afterwards, the study of entrepreneurs psychological traits and cognition were carried
out in order to analyse the potential influence on decision-making process. However,
some limitations could not be avoided in this paper because the studying areas of the
influence on decision-making process only based on the theories that related to
entrepreneurs individual psychology and cognition and further study of the influence
from managerial behaviour is needed in the future.
-
7/31/2019 110019101-Jialin Li-Critical Literature Review-International Entrepreneurship
9/12
9
References
Acedo, F. J. and Florin, J. (2006): An entrepreneurial cognition perspective on the internationalization of
SMEs,Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 4 (1), 49-67.
Andersen, Poul Houman - Blenker, Per - Christensen, Poul Rind (1997) Generic Routes to Subcontractors
Internationalisation, In: The Nature of the International Firm, Eds. Bjrkman, I. - Forsgren, M.,
Copenhagen: Copenhagen BusinessSchool Press, 231-255.
Andersson, S. (2000) The internationalization of the firm from an entrepreneurial perspective,
International Studies of Management & Organization, 30 (1), 63- 92.
Bandura, A. (1986), Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.
Baron, R. (1998), Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: why and when entrepreneurs think
differently than other people,Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 13, pp. 275-294.
Begley, T. M., & Boyd, D. P. (1987) A comparison of entrepreneurs and managers of small business firms
[Electronic Version].Journal of Management, 13(1), 99-108. Retrieved September 28, 2007 from Business
Source Premier.
Bonaccorsi, Andrea (1992) On the relationship between firm size and export intensity, Journal of
International Business Studies, 23 (4): 605-635.
Brockhaus, R. (1980), Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 23
(3), pp. 509-520
Blomstermo, A. and Deo Sharma, D. (2003): Three decades of research on the internationalization process
of firms, in: Blomstermo, A and Deo Sharma, D. (eds.): Learning in the internationalization Process of
firms, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
Busenitz, L. and J. Barney (1997), Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations:
Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 12, pp. 9 -30.
-
7/31/2019 110019101-Jialin Li-Critical Literature Review-International Entrepreneurship
10/12
10
Bygrave, W. B. (1989). The entrepreneurship paradigm (I): A philosophic look at its research
methodologies [Electronic Version].Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13, 726. Retrieved October 4,
2007 from Business Source Premier.
Casson, M. (1982), The entrepreneur: an economic theory, London, Gregg Revivals.
Chen, C., P. Greene and A. Crick (1998), Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from
managers?,Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 13, pp. 295-316.
Connell, D. (1999), Collective entrepreneurship: In search of meaning, Available from website:
[http://www.djconnell.ca/articles/CollEntrep.pdf]
Cooper, A., C. Wood and W. Dunkelberg (1988), Entrepreneurs perceived chances for success, Journal of
Business Venturing, Vol. 3 (2), pp. 97-108.
Cope, J. (2005): Toward a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship: Theory
and Practice, 29 (4), 373-397.
Drucker, P. (1985), The Discipline of Innovation,Harvard Business Review, Vol. 63 (3), pp. 67-72.
Forgas, J. (1995), Emotion in social judgements: review and a new affect infusion model (AIM),
Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 117, pp. 39-66.
Hornaday, J. and J. Aboud (1971) Characteristics of successful entrepreneurs, Personnel Psychology, Vol.
24, pp. 141-153.
Hofstede, G. (1980) Cultures consequences: international differences in work related values, Beverly
Hilss, CA, Sage Publications.
Johanson, Jan and Vahlne, Jan-Erik (1977) The internationalisation process of the firm a model of
knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments,Journal of International Business, 8
(1): 23-32.
Jones, M.V. (1999) The Internationalization of Small High-Technology Firms, Journal of International
Marketing, 7 (4): 15-41.
Lundberg, C. C. (1995): Learning in and by organizations: Three conceptual issues, International Journal
of Organizational Analysis, 3 (1), 10-23.
-
7/31/2019 110019101-Jialin Li-Critical Literature Review-International Entrepreneurship
11/12
11
Kickul, Jill and Gundry, Lisa K. (2002) Prospecting for strategic advantage: The proactive entrepreneurial
personality and small firm innovation,Journal of Small Business Management, 40 (2): 85-97.
Kirzner, I. (1973) Competition and entrepreneurship, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.
Levander, A. and I. Raccuia (2001) Entrepreneurial Profiling A cognitive approach to entrepreneurship,
Stockholm, Stockholm Business School.
Low, M. and I. MacMillan (1988) Entrepreneurship: past research and future challenges, Journal of
Management, Vol. 14 (2), pp. 139-161.
Madsen, Tage Koed and Servais, Per (1997) The Internationalization of Born Globals: an Evolutionary
Process,International Business Review, 6 (6): 561-583.
McClelland, D. (1961), The achieving society, New York, Van Nostrand.
McGrath, R., I. MacMillan & S. Scheineberg (1992) Elitists, risk-takers, and rugged individualists? An
exploratory analysis of cultural differences between entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs, Journal of
Business Venturing, Vol. 7, pp. 115-135.
McDougall, Patricia Phillips and Oviatt, Benjamin M. (2000) International Entrepreneurship: The
intersection of two research paths,Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5): 902-908.
McDougall, Patricia Phillips and Oviatt, Benjamin M. (2000) International Entrepreneurship: The
intersection of two research paths,Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5): 902-908.
Minniti, M. and Bygrave, W. (2001): A Dynamic Model of Entrepreneurial Learning, Entrepreneurship:
Theory and Practice, 25 (3): 5-16.
Misztal, B. (1998). Trust in Modern Societies The Search for the Bases of Social Order. Malden, USA:
Blackwell Publishers Inc.
Nummela, Niina and Saarenketo, Sami and Puumalainen, Kaisu (2002) Global mindset a prerequisite for
successful internationalisation? Proceedings of the 3rd
Biennial McGill Conference on International
Entrepreneurship, Montreal, September 13-16, 2002.
Oviatt, B.M. and McDougall, P.P. (2005): The internationalization of entrepreneurship, Journal of
-
7/31/2019 110019101-Jialin Li-Critical Literature Review-International Entrepreneurship
12/12
12
International Business Studies, 36 (1), 28.
Rae, D. and Carswell, M. (2000): Using a life-story approach in researching entrepreneurial learning: the
development of a conceptual model and its implications in the design of learning experiences,Education +
Training, 42 (4/5), 220-227.
Shaver, K.G. & L.R. Scott. (1991) Person, process, choice: The psychology of new venture creation,
Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 1 (2), Winter, 23-46.
Simonsson, C. (2002).Den kommunikativa utmaningen En studie av kommunikationen mellan chef och
medarbetare I en modern organisation. Lund: Sociologiska institutionen, Lunds universitet.
Schumpeter, J. (1934), Review of Robinsons economics of imperfect competition, JPE.
Zacharakis, A. and D. Shepherd (2001), The nature of information and overconfidence on venture
capitalists decision process?,Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 13, pp. 57-76.