11-1 copyright © 2004 by nelson, a division of thomson canada limited. capital investment decisions...
TRANSCRIPT
11-1Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Capital Capital Investment Investment DecisionsDecisions
1111
PowerPresentation® prepared by PowerPresentation® prepared by
David J. McConomy, Queen’s UniversityDavid J. McConomy, Queen’s University
11-2Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives
Explain what a capital investment decision is and distinguish between independent and mutually exclusive capital investment projects.
Compute the payback period and accounting rate of return for a proposed investment and explain their roles in capital investment decisions.
11-3Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives(continued)(continued)
Use net present value (NPV) analysis for capital investment decisions involving independent projects.
Use the internal rate of return (IRR) to assess the acceptability of independent projects.
11-4Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Learning Objectives (continued)Learning Objectives (continued)
Explain why NPV is better than IRR for capital investment decisions involving mutually exclusive projects.
Explain the role and value of postaudits. Convert gross cash flows to after-tax cash
flows. Describe capital investment in an advanced
manufacturing environment.
11-5Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Capital BudgetingCapital Budgeting
Capital budgeting is the process of making capital investment decisions.
Two types of capital budgeting projects:
1. Independent projects: Projects that, if accepted or rejected, will not affect the cash flows of another project.
2. Mutually exclusive projects:Projects that, if accepted, preclude the accepting all other competing projects.
11-6Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Payback Method: Uneven Cash Payback Method: Uneven Cash FlowsFlows
Payback Period is the time required to recover a project’s original investment.Example: Investment = $100,000
Unrecovered Annual Cash
Investment Flow
(beg. Of Year)
Year 1: $100,000 $30,000
2: 70,000 $40,000
3: 30,000 $50,000
4: -- $60,000
5: -- $70,000
Payback = 2.6 years.
$30,000 (yr. 1) + $40,000 (yr. 2) + $30,000 (60% of yr. 3).
11-7Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Payback MethodPayback Method Possible reasons for usePossible reasons for use
To help control the risks associated with the uncertainty of future cash flows
To help minimize the impact of an investment on the company’s liquidity
To help control the risk of obsolescence
To help control the effect of the investment on performance measures
11-8Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Payback MethodPayback Method Major deficienciesMajor deficiencies
Ignores the performance
of the investment
beyond the payback
period
Ignores the time value
of money
11-9Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Accounting Rate Of Return Accounting Rate Of Return (ARR)(ARR)
ARR = Average Income/Investment
Average income equals average annual net
cash flows, less average amortization.
Example: Suppose that some new equipment requires an
initial outlay of $80,000 and promises total cash
flows of $120,000 over the next five years (the life
of the machine). What is the ARR?
11-10Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Accounting Rate Of Return Accounting Rate Of Return (ARR) (continued)(ARR) (continued)
Answer: The average cash flow is $24,000 ($120,000/5) and the average amortization is $16,000 ($80,000/5).
ARR = ($24,000 - $16,000)/$80,000= $8,000/$80,000= 10%
11-11Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Accounting Rate Of Return Accounting Rate Of Return (ARR)(ARR)
Possible reasons for usePossible reasons for use
A screening measure to ensure that new investment will not adversely affect financial ratios
To ensure a favourable effect on net income so that bonuses can be earned (increased)
11-12Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Accounting Rate Of Return Accounting Rate Of Return (ARR)(ARR)
The major deficiency of the accounting rate of return is that it ignores the time value of money.
11-13Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Net Present Value (NPV)Net Present Value (NPV)
Definition:
NPV = P - I
where:P = the present value of the project’s future cash inflows
I = the present value of the project’s cost (usually the initial outlay)
NPV IS A MEASURE OF THE PROFITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT, EXPRESSED IN CURRENT DOLLARS.
11-14Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Net Present Value (NPV): Net Present Value (NPV): ExampleExample
Majestic Company has an opportunity to invest $360,000 for new equipment. The new equipment will generate an additional net income of $120,000 per year. Calculate the net present value of the project assuming a 12% discount rate.
Discount PresentYear Cash Flow Factor Value
0 $(360,000) 1.000 $(360,000)
1 120,000 0.893 107,160
2 120,000 0.797 95,640
3 120,000 0.712 85,440
4 120,000 0.636 76,3205 200,000 0.567 113,400
$117,960
=====
11-15Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Decision Criteria for NPVDecision Criteria for NPV
If the NPV > 0 this indicates:
1. The initial investment has been recovered
2. The required rate of return has been recovered
3. A return in excess of 1. and 2. has been received
Thus, the project should be accepted.
11-16Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Decision Criteria for NPV Decision Criteria for NPV (continued)(continued)
If NPV = 0, this indicates:
1. The initial investment has been recovered
2. The required rate of return has been recovered
Thus, break even has been achieved and we are indifferent about the project.
11-17Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Decision Criteria for NPV Decision Criteria for NPV (continued)(continued)
If NPV < 0, this indicates:
1. The initial investment may or may not be recovered
2. The required rate of return has not been recovered
Thus, the project should be rejected.
11-18Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Reinvestment AssumptionReinvestment Assumption
The NVP model assumes that all cash flows generated by a project are immediately reinvested to earn the required rate of return throughout the life of the project.
11-19Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Internal Rate Of Return (IRR)Internal Rate Of Return (IRR)
The internal rate of return (IRR) is the discount rate that sets the project’s NPV at zero. Thus, P = I for the IRR.
Example: A project requires a $10,000 investment and will return $12,000 after one year. What is the IRR?
$12,000/(1 + i) = $10,000 1 + I = 1.2
I = 0.20
11-20Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Internal Rate Of Return (IRR)Internal Rate Of Return (IRR)
Decision criteria:
If the IRR > Cost of Capital, the project should be accepted.
If the IRR = Cost of Capital, the project breaks even, and acceptance or rejection is equal.
If the IRR < Cost of Capital, the project should be rejected.
11-21Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Internal Rate Of Return (IRR)Internal Rate Of Return (IRR) Reinvestment AssumptionReinvestment Assumption
The cash inflows received from the project are immediately reinvested to earn a return equal to the IRR for the remaining life of the project.
11-22Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
NPV versus IRRNPV versus IRR
There are two major differences between the two approaches:
• NPV assumes cash inflows are reinvested at the required rate of return whereas the IRR method assumes that the inflows are reinvested at the internal rate of return.
• NPV measures the profitability of a project in absolute dollars, whereas the IRR method measures the profitability in relative terms.
11-23Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
NPV versus IRR (continued)NPV versus IRR (continued)
Conflicting Signals (required rate of return) = 20%
Year Design A Design B0 $(180,000) $(210,000)1 60,000 70,000 2 60,000 70,000 3 60,000 70,0004 60,000 70,0005 60,000 70,000
IRR 20% 20%
NPV $ 36,300 $ 42,350
11-24Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
NPV versus IRR (continued)NPV versus IRR (continued)
Which project should be selected?
IRR signals either Design, whereas NPV signals Design B.
The terminal value of Design A is $36,300.
The terminal value of Design B is $42,350.
Design B provides the most wealth and should be selected (AS SIGNALED BY NPV).
IRR may be misleading.
11-25Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Discount Rate: Discount Rate: The Cost Of CapitalThe Cost Of Capital
The appropriate discount rate to use for NPV computations is the cost of capital. The COST OF CAPITAL is the weighted average of the returns expected by the different parties contributing funds. The weights are determined by the proportion of funds provided by each source.
11-26Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Discount Rate: Discount Rate: The Cost Of CapitalThe Cost Of Capital
Example: A company is planning on financing a project by borrowing $10,000 and by raising $20,000 by issuing capital stock. The net cost of borrowing is 6% per year. The stock carries an expected return of 9%. The sources of capital for this project and their cost are in the same proportion and amounts that the company usually experiences. Calculate the cost of capital.
Source Amount Cost Weight Cost x Weight
Debt $10,000 6% 1/3 2%
Stock 20,000 9% 2/3 6%
Weighted-Average Cost of Capital 8%===
11-27Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Inflationary AdjustmentInflationary AdjustmentAn Illustrative ExampleAn Illustrative Example
Assume that the rate of inflation is 15% per year.
Analysis without Inflationary Adjustment (assumes a 20% discount rate)
Year Cash Flow Discount Factor Present Value
0 (5,000,000 ) 1.000 (5,000,000)
1-2 2,900,000 1.528 4,431,200
NPV (568,800)========
Analysis with Inflationary Adjustment
Year Cash Flow Discount Factor Present Value
0 (5,000,000 ) 1.000 (5,000,000)
1 3,335,000 * 0.833 2,778,055
2 3,835,250 **0.694 2,661,664
NPV 439,719========
* 1.15 x $2,900,000
** 1.15 x 1.15 x $2,900,000
Notice that adjustment for inflation can affect the decision.
11-28Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
After-Tax Operating Cash FlowsAfter-Tax Operating Cash Flows The Income ApproachThe Income Approach
After-tax cash flow = After-tax net income + Noncash expenses
Example:Revenues $1,000,000Less: Operating expenses* 600,000Income before taxes $ 400,000Less: Income taxes 136,000Net income $ 264,000
========
* Includes $100,000 amortization expense
After-tax cash flow = $264,000 + $100,000
= $364,000
11-29Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
After-Tax FlowsAfter-Tax FlowsDecomposition ApproachDecomposition Approach
After-tax cash revenues = (1 - Tax rate) x Cash revenuesAfter-tax cash expenses = (1 - Tax rate) x Cash expensesTax savings (noncash expenses) = (Tax rate) x Noncash expenses
Total operating cash = after-tax cash revenues
- after-tax cash expenses
+ tax savings on noncash expenses
Example:
Revenues = $1,000,000,
cash expenses = $500,000, and
amortization = $100,000.
Tax rate = 34%.After-tax cash revenues (1 - .34) x ($1,000,000) = $660,000 Less: After-tax cash expense (1 - .34) x ($500,000) = (330,000)Add: Tax savings (noncash exp.) .34 x ($100,000) = 34,000
Total $364,000 =======
11-30Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
AmortizationAmortizationTax-Shielding EffectTax-Shielding Effect
Amortization is a noncash expense and is not a cash flow. Amortization, however SHIELDS revenues from being taxed and, thus, creates a cash inflow equal to the tax savings.
Assume initially that tax laws DO NOT allow amortization to be deducted to arrive at taxable income. If a company had before-tax operating cash flows of $300,000 and amortization of $100,000, we have the following statement:
Net operating cash flows $ 300,000
Less: amortization 0
Taxable income $ 300,000
Less: Income taxes (@ 34%) (102,000) Net income $ 198,000
========
11-31Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
AmortizationAmortizationTax-Shielding EffectTax-Shielding Effect
Now assume that the tax laws allow a deduction for amortization:
Net operating cash flows $300,000 Less: Amortization 100,000
Taxable income $200,000 Less: Income taxes (@ 34%) (68,000) Net income $132,000
=======
Notice that the taxes saved are $34,000 ($102,000 - $68,000). Thus, the firm has additional cash available of $34,000.
This savings can be computed by multiplying the tax rate by the amount of amortization claimed:
.34 x $100,000 = $34,000
11-32Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Tax Laws: Capital Cost AllowanceTax Laws: Capital Cost Allowance
In Canada, amortization is not allowed as a deduction in determining taxable income, but Capital cost allowance is allowed as a deduction instead. CCA is
similar to amortization but is governed by a special set of rules dictated by the income tax act and regulations. Each capital asset is assigned to a capital asset class along with other similar assets A pre-determined CCA rate applies to the balance of the capital cost in a particular class There are currently more than 40 separate classes, each with a specific maximum rate CCA applies a declining-balance system, and the size of the tax shield will be different for each year CCA applies to an asset pool in a given class. If there are other assets in the class, a project may continue to affect the firm’s cash flows even after the project’s assets are retired.
11-33Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Capital Cost Allowance - Capital Cost Allowance - A Sample of Asset Tax ClassesA Sample of Asset Tax Classes
Class Examples of Assets Included Maximum Rate
Class 1 Buildings and other structures 4%
Class 7 Boats, ships 15%
Class 8 Equipment and machinery 20%
Class 9 Aircraft 25%
Class 10 Computer equipment, trucks 30%
Class 12 Small tools, computer software 100%
Class 33 Timber resource property 15%
Class 37 Amusement park buildings and equipment 15%
11-34Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Capital Cost AllowanceCapital Cost Allowance
Present Value of CCA Tax Shield
= (R x C x T) / (R + i)
Where Example
R = CCA (R)ate 30%
C = Original (C)apital cost of the project $300,000
T = (T)ax rate 40%
i = Required rate of return [(i)nterest factor] 10%
PV of CCA Tax Shield = (30% x 300,000 x 40%) / (30% + 10%)
= $90,000
11-35Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
APPENDIX AAPPENDIX AAPPENDIX AAPPENDIX A
11-36Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Future Value: Time Value of Future Value: Time Value of MoneyMoney
Let:F = future value
i = the interest rate
P = the present value or original outlay
n = the number or periods
Future value can be expressed by the following formula:
F = P(1 + i)n
11-37Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Future Value: ExampleFuture Value: Example
Assume the investment is $1,000. The interest rate is 8%. What is the future value if the money is invested for one year? Two? Three?
11-38Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Future Value (continued)Future Value (continued)
F = $1,000(1.08) = $1,080.00 (after one year)
F = $1,000(1.08)2 = $1,166.40 (after two years)
F = $1,000(1.08)3 = $1,259.71 (after three years)
11-39Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Present ValuePresent Value
P = F/(1 + i)n
The discount factor, 1/(1 + i), is computed for various combinations of I and n. See Exhibit 11B-1.
Example: Compute the present value of $300 to be received three years from now. The interest rate is 12%.
Answer: From Exhibit 11B-1, the discount factor is 0.712. Thus, the present value (P) is:
P = F (df)
= $300 x 0.712
= $213.60
11-40Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
Present Value (continued)Present Value (continued)
Example: Calculate the present value of a $100 per year annuity, to be received for
the next three years. The interest rate is 12%.
Answer:
Discount Present
Year Cash Factor Value
1 $100 0.893 $ 89.30
2 100 0.797 79.70
3 100 0.712 71.20
2.402 * $240.20======
* Notice that it is possible to multiply the sum of the individual discount factors
(.40) by $100 to obtain the same answer. See Exhibit 11 B-2 for these sums which
can be used as discount factors for uniform series.