11 - 1 ©2003 prentice hall business publishing, cost accounting 11/e, horngren/datar/foster...
TRANSCRIPT
11 - 1©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Decision Making andRelevant InformationDecision Making andRelevant Information
Chapter 11
11 - 2©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Learning Objective 1
Use the five-step decisionprocess to make decisions.
11 - 3©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Information and theDecision Process
Information and theDecision Process
A decision model is a formal methodfor making a choice, often involvingquantitative and qualitative analysis.
11 - 4©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Five-Step Decision ProcessFive-Step Decision Process
Gather Information
Make Predictions
Choose an Alternative
Implement the Decision
Evaluate Performance
Step 1.
Step 2.
Step 3.
Step 4.
Step 5.
Historical CostsOther Information
Specific Predictions
Fee
db
ack
11 - 5©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Learning Objective 2Learning Objective 2
Differentiate relevantfrom irrelevant
costs and revenues indecision situations.
11 - 6©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
The Meaning of RelevanceThe Meaning of Relevance
Relevant costs and relevant revenues areexpected future costs and revenues that
differ among alternative courses of action.
Historical costs Sunk costs
Differential income Differential costs
11 - 7©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Learning Objective 3Learning Objective 3
Distinguish between quantitativeand qualitative factors in decisions.
11 - 8©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Quantitative and QualitativeRelevant Information
Quantitative and QualitativeRelevant Information
Quantitative factors
Financial Nonfinancial
Qualitative factors
11 - 9©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
One-Time-OnlySpecial Order Example
One-Time-OnlySpecial Order Example
The Bismark Co. manufacturing plant has aproduction capacity of 44,000 towels each month.
Current monthly production is 30,000 towels.
Costs can be classified as either variable or fixedwith respect to units of output.
11 - 10©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
One-Time-OnlySpecial Order Example
One-Time-OnlySpecial Order Example
Variable FixedCosts Costs
Per Unit Per UnitDirect materials $6.50 $ -0-Direct labor .50 1.50Manufacturing costs 1.50 3.50Total $8.50 $5.00
11 - 11©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
One-Time-OnlySpecial Order Example
One-Time-OnlySpecial Order Example
Total fixed direct manufacturing labor is $45,000.
Total fixed overhead is $105,000.
Marketing costs per unit are $7($5 of which is variable).
What is the full cost per towel?
11 - 12©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
One-Time-OnlySpecial Order Example
One-Time-OnlySpecial Order Example
A hotel in San Juan has offered to buy5,000 towels from Bismark Co. at
$11.50/towel for a total of $57,500.
No marketing costs will be incurred.
Variable ($8.50 + $5.00): $13.50Fixed: 7.00Total $20.50
11 - 13©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
One-Time-OnlySpecial Order Example
One-Time-OnlySpecial Order Example
$8.50 × 5,000 = $42,500 incremental costs
What are the incremental revenues ?
What are the relevant costs of making the towels ?
$57,500 – $42,500 = $15,000
11 - 14©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Learning Objective 4Learning Objective 4
Beware of two potentialproblems in
relevant-cost analysis.
11 - 15©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Two Potential Problems inRelevant-Cost Analysis
Two Potential Problems inRelevant-Cost Analysis
Incorrect generalassumptions:
All variable costsare relevant.
All fixed costsare irrelevant.
1 2
Misleadingunit-cost data:
Includeirrelevant costs.
Use same unitcosts at different
output levels.
11 - 16©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Outsourcing versus InsourcingOutsourcing versus Insourcing
Outsourcing ispurchasing goodsand services fromoutside vendors.
Insourcing isproducing goods
or providing serviceswithin the organization.
11 - 17©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Make-or-Buy Decisions ExampleMake-or-Buy Decisions Example
Bismark Co. also manufactures bath accessories.
Management is considering producing a part itneeds (#2) or buying a part produced
by Towson Co. for $0.55.
11 - 18©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Make-or-Buy Decisions ExampleMake-or-Buy Decisions Example
Bismark Co. has the following costsfor 150,000 units of Part #2:
Direct materials $ 28,000Direct labor 18,500Mixed overhead 29,000Variable overhead 15,000Fixed overhead 30,000Total $120,500
11 - 19©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Make-or-Buy Decisions ExampleMake-or-Buy Decisions Example
Mixed overhead consists of materialhandling and setup costs.
Bismark Co. produces the 150,000 unitsin 100 batches of 1,500 units each.
Total material handling and setup costsequal fixed costs of $9,000 plus variable
costs of $200 per batch.
11 - 20©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Make-or-Buy Decisions ExampleMake-or-Buy Decisions Example
What is the cost per unit for Part #2?
$120,500 ÷ 150,000 units = $0.8033/unit
Should Bismark Co. manufacture the partor buy it from Towson Co.?
11 - 21©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Make-or-Buy Decisions ExampleMake-or-Buy Decisions Example
Bismark Co. anticipates that next year the150,000 units of Part #2 expected to be
sold will be manufactured in 150batches of 1,000 units each.
11 - 22©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Make-or-Buy Decisions ExampleMake-or-Buy Decisions Example
Variable costs per batch are expected todecrease to $100.
Bismark Co. plans to continue to produce150,000 next year at the same variable
manufacturing costs per unit as this year.
Fixed costs are expected to remain thesame as this year.
11 - 23©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Make-or-Buy Decisions ExampleMake-or-Buy Decisions Example
What is the variable manufacturing cost per unit?
$61,500 ÷ 150,000 = $0.41 per unit
Direct material $28,000Direct labor 18,500Variable overhead 15,000Total $61,500
11 - 24©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Make-or-Buy Decisions ExampleMake-or-Buy Decisions Example
Expected relevant cost to make Part #2:
Cost to buy: (150,000 × $0.55) $82,500
Manufacturing $61,500Material handling and setups 15,000*Total relevant cost to make $76,500*150 × $100 = $15,000
Bismark Co. will save $6,000 by making the part.
11 - 25©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Make-or-Buy Decisions ExampleMake-or-Buy Decisions Example
Now assume that the $9,000 in fixed clericalsalaries to support material handling and
setup will not be incurred if Part #2 ispurchased from Towson Co..
Should Bismark Co. buy the part or make the part?
11 - 26©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Make-or-Buy Decisions ExampleMake-or-Buy Decisions Example
Relevant cost to make:
Variable $76,500Fixed 9,000Total $85,500
Cost to buy: $82,500
Bismark would save $3,000 by buying the part.
11 - 27©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Learning Objective 5Learning Objective 5
Explain the opportunity-costconcept and why it is
used in decision making.
11 - 28©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Opportunity Costs,Outsourcing, and Constraints
Opportunity Costs,Outsourcing, and Constraints
Assume that if Bismark buys the part fromTowson, it can use the facilities previously
used to manufacture Part #2 to producePart #3 for Krysta Company.
The expected additional future operatingincome is $18,000.
What should Bismark Co. do?
11 - 29©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Opportunity Costs,Outsourcing, and Constraints
Opportunity Costs,Outsourcing, and Constraints
Bismark Co. has three options regarding Krysta:
1. Make Part #2 and do not make Part #3.
2. Buy Part #2 and do not make Part #3.
3. Buy the part and use the facilities to produce Part #3.
11 - 30©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Opportunity Costs,Outsourcing, and Constraints
Opportunity Costs,Outsourcing, and Constraints
Expected cost of obtaining 150,000 parts:
Buy Part #2 and do not make Part #3: $82,500
Buy Part #2 and make Part #3:$82,500 – $18,000 = $64,500
Make Part #2: $76,500
11 - 31©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Opportunity Costs,Outsourcing, and Constraints
Opportunity Costs,Outsourcing, and Constraints
Opportunity cost is the contribution to incomethat is forgone (rejected) by not using a
limited resource in its next-best alternative use.
11 - 32©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Opportunity Costs,Outsourcing, and Constraints
Opportunity Costs,Outsourcing, and Constraints
Assume that annual estimated Part #2requirements for next year is 150,000.
Cost per purchase order is $40.
Cost per unit when each purchase is1,500 units = $0.55.
Cost per unit when each purchase is equalto or greater than 150,000 = $0.54.
11 - 33©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Opportunity Costs,Outsourcing, and Constraints
Opportunity Costs,Outsourcing, and Constraints
Average investment in inventory is either:
(1,500 × .55) ÷ 2 = $412.50 or
(150,000 × $0.54) = $40,500
Annual interest rate for investment ingovernment bonds is 6%.
$412.50 × .06 = $24.75
$40,500 × .06 = $2,430
11 - 34©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Opportunity Costs,Outsourcing, and Constraints
Opportunity Costs,Outsourcing, and Constraints
Option A: Make 100 purchases of 1,500 units:
Purchase order costs: (100 × $40) $ 4,000.00
Purchase costs: (150,000 × $0.55) $82,500.00
Annual interest income: $ 24.75
Relevant costs: $86,524.75
11 - 35©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Opportunity Costs,Outsourcing, and Constraints
Opportunity Costs,Outsourcing, and Constraints
Option B: Make 1 purchase of 150,000 units:
Purchase order costs: (1 × $40) $ 40
Purchase costs: (150,000 × $0.54) $81,000
Annual interest income: $ 2,430
Relevant costs: $83,470
11 - 36©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Learning Objective 6Learning Objective 6
Know how to choose whichproducts to produce when there
are capacity constraints.
11 - 37©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Product-Mix DecisionsUnder Capacity Constraints
Product-Mix DecisionsUnder Capacity Constraints
Per unit Product #2 Product #3Sales price $2.11 $14.50Variable expenses 0.41 13.90Contribution margin $1.70 $ 0.60Contribution margin ratio 81% 4%
Bismark Co. has 3,000 machine-hours available.
11 - 38©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Product-Mix DecisionsUnder Capacity Constraints
Product-Mix DecisionsUnder Capacity Constraints
One unit of Prod. #2 requires 7 machine-hours.
One unit of Prod. #3 requires 2 machine-hours.
What is the contribution of each productper machine-hour?
Product #2: $1.70 ÷ 7 = $0.24Product #3: $0.60 ÷ 2 = $0.30
11 - 39©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Learning Objective 7Learning Objective 7
Discuss what managersmust consider when
adding or discontinuing customers and segments.
11 - 40©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Profitability, Activity-BasedCosting, and Relevant CostsProfitability, Activity-BasedCosting, and Relevant Costs
Mountain View Furniture supplies furnitureto two local retailers – Stevens and Cohen.
The company has a monthly capacityof 3,000 machine-hours.
Fixed costs are allocated on the basis of revenues.
11 - 41©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Profitability, Activity-Based Costing, and Relevant CostsProfitability, Activity-Based Costing, and Relevant Costs
Stevens CohenRevenues $200,000 $100,000Variable costs 70,000 60,000Fixed costs 100,000 50,000Total operating costs $170,000 $110,000Operating income $ 30,000 $(10,000)Machine-hours required 2,000 1,000
11 - 42©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Profitability, Activity-Based Costing, and Relevant CostsProfitability, Activity-Based Costing, and Relevant Costs
TotalRevenues $300,000Variable costs 130,000Fixed costs 150,000Total operating costs $280,000Operating income $ 20,000Machine-hours required 3,000
11 - 43©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Profitability, Activity-Based Costing, and Relevant CostsProfitability, Activity-Based Costing, and Relevant Costs
Should Mountain View Furniture drop the Cohenbusiness, assuming that dropping Cohen would
decrease its total fixed costs by 10%?
New fixed costs would be:$150,000 – $15,000 = $135,000
11 - 44©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Profitability, Activity-Based Costing, and Relevant CostsProfitability, Activity-Based Costing, and Relevant Costs
Stevens AloneRevenues $200,000Variable costs 70,000Fixed costs 135,000Total operating costs $205,000Operating income $ (5,000)Machine-hours required 3,000
11 - 45©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Profitability, Activity-Based Costing, and Relevant CostsProfitability, Activity-Based Costing, and Relevant Costs
Cohen’s business is providing acontribution margin of $40,000.
$40,000 decrease in contribution margin– $15,000 decrease in fixed costs= $25,000 decrease in operating income.
11 - 46©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Profitability, Activity-Based Costing, and Relevant CostsProfitability, Activity-Based Costing, and Relevant Costs
Assume that if Mountain View Furniture dropsCohen’s business it can lease the excess capacity
to the Perez Corporation for $70,000.
Fixed costs would not decrease.
Should Mountain View Furniture lease to Perez?
11 - 47©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Learning Objective 8Learning Objective 8
Explain why the book valueof equipment is irrelevant in
equipment-replacement decisions.
11 - 48©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Equipment-Replacement Decisions Example
Equipment-Replacement Decisions Example
Existing ReplacementMachine Machine
Original cost $80,000 $105,000Useful life 4 years 4 yearsAccumulated depreciation $50,000Book value $30,000Disposal price $14,000Annual costs $46,000 $ 10,000
11 - 49©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Equipment-Replacement Decisions Example
Equipment-Replacement Decisions Example
Ignoring the time value of money andincome taxes, should the company
replace the existing machine?
The cost savings over a 4-year period will be$36,000 × 4 = $144,000.
Investment = $105,000 – $14,000 = $91,000
$144,000 – $91,000 = $53,000advantage of the replacement machine.
11 - 50©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Learning Objective 9Learning Objective 9
Explain how conflicts can arisebetween the decision modelused by a manager and the
performance evaluation modelused to evaluate the manager.
11 - 51©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Decisions andPerformance Evaluation
Decisions andPerformance Evaluation
What is the journal entry to sell the existing machine?
Cash 14,000Accumulated Depreciation 50,000Loss on Disposal 16,000Machine 80,000
11 - 52©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Decisions andPerformance Evaluation
Decisions andPerformance Evaluation
In the real world would the managerreplace the machine?
An important factor in replacement decisionsis the manager’s perceptions of whether thedecision model is consistent with how the
manager’s performance is judged.
11 - 53©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Decisions andPerformance Evaluation
Decisions andPerformance Evaluation
Top management faces a challenge – that is,making sure that the performance-evaluationmodel of subordinate managers is consistent
with the decision model.
11 - 54©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
End of Chapter 11End of Chapter 11