1 using mobile phone technology to improve antenatal and pmtct service delivery and uptake in kenya...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Using Mobile Phone Technology to Improve Antenatal and PMTCT
Service Delivery and Uptake in Kenya
Seble Kassaye, MD, MSElizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation
July 2012
Introduction
• Project developed in response to WHO call for implementation research– efficacious interventions to accelerate
progress towards MDGs 4,5,6• Substantial loss to follow-up during
PMTCT cascade despite initial high ANC uptake
Epidemiology
*Study districts: Rachuonyo and Homabay, Nyanza province†Excluding SD NVP
Kiarie et al.. Evaluation of utilization and effectiveness of PMTCT services in Kenya. Kenya National PMTCT Implementers Meeting. Nairobi, Kenya: July 18-20, 2011; DHS Kenya 2009
Kenya Nyanza Province*
HIV Prevalence 6.2% 14.9%
HIV Prevalence – pregnant women 17.7%(18.4% &18.9%*)
HTC in ANC 71%**
Women receiving ARVs during pregnancy for prophylaxis or treatment
81%
Facility-based deliveries 44%†
Infants receiving antiretrovirals for PMTCT
62.7%
Infants tested for HIV 39.6%
Why Use Mobile Phones
• Explore operational effectiveness of mobile phone technology for PMTCT
• Enable communication between health providers and patients, thus improving outreach for PMTCT service delivery – Reinforce key messages – Promote specific behaviors
• High mobile phone coverage in Kenya– National census Kenya 2010 – 63% of
households have mobile phone• Collaboration between EGPAF and Ministry of
Health, Kenya
Formative Research
• Focus group discussions (community health workers, peer educators, PMTCT program participants and their partners):– Topics
• Health seeking behaviors– ANC visits– Antiretrovirals and adherence– Facility deliveries– Infant feeding– Early infant diagnosis
• Current phone use and ownership• Preferred messaging/support for key PMTCT
Identified Challenges
Infant follow up – for immunizations but less so for HIV testing
Forget appointments
Miss doses of ARVs
Minimal support for Partner HTC
Limited ability to Communicate for Transport support
PMTCT
Essential Maternal Child
Health
Male Partner Involvement
Motivational Messages and Communication
Coordination/communication between CHWs and patients-
Challenges with communication/ stigma
Social environment does not encourage male participation in MCH
Objectives
Primary• To measure effect of PMTCT-focused structured SMS text
messaging and calls on completion of key PMTCT cascade milestones during pregnancy up to 6-8 weeks postpartum
• To determine acceptability of PMTCT-focused SMS text messaging among pregnant women and male partners
• To evaluate cost inputs and cost estimates for scale-up of the mobile phone intervention components
Secondary• To determine whether male partner involvement with
SMS intervention improves increased PMTCT cascade completion at six weeks postpartum.
Study Design
• Cluster randomized control study– Randomization:• stratified by district and facility type i.e.
hospital, health center and dispensary• accounts for different volumes
– Semi-automated SMS system• Functional for bidirectional communication
– Phone calls between health care providers and participants as appropriate
• Health facility• CHWs
• mHealth Platform• SMS• Phone calls
• PMTCT patient
• Male Partner
Intervention• Web-based and server• Semi-automated
-- Automated components-- Manual components
PMTCT
Male Partner
Involvement
Motivational Messages and Communication
Essential Maternal
Child Health
Drug Adherence
Appointment Reminders Infant HIV testing
Nutrition
Birth Planning
Warning Signs
Partner HIV Testing
Encouragement
Seek Support
SMS Thematic Areas
SMS Messages
Here's advice on timing of pregnancy medicines. Try to take them at the same time each day. It works better if you do! And it will help you not to forget.
Some women eat less food during pregnancy to avoid a large baby. However, this is a myth. Expectant moms should eat a little more than usual for good health!
After birth, give your baby only the very best, your breast milk ONLY, and no other foods or liquids for the first 6 months. Be strong against pressure.
Continue exclusive breastfeeding. Breast milk has all the necessary ingredients and at the correct temperature. Exclusive breastfeeding will avoid diarrhea.
Message of hope: There are women like you all over the world. They walk the same path that you do. Think of them. They will think of you. Don't lose hope.
All men should know their status. And women too. This gives you peace of mind. You'll be smart, strong, and well prepared. Tell a friend to get tested too.
Study Outcomes
Primary Outcome: proportion of women who successfully complete key PMTCT transition points from antenatal to six weeks postpartum
(i) Initiation of antiretrovirals during pregnancy
(ii) delivery at a health facility
(iii) Infant HIV testing at 6 weeks and receipt of
results
Study Outcomes (2)
Secondary Outcomes:(i) number of antenatal care visits (ii) maternal adherence to ARVs (iii) time to initiation of ARVs (iv) uptake of ARVs during labor, delivery, and
postpartum(v) exclusive breastfeeding (vi) uptake of family planning at 6 weeks
postpartum
Pilot: April – June 2012Total Intervention Control
Participants screened 259 155 104
Eligible 199 113 86
Eligible and enrolled 140 females7 males
74 females7 males
66 females0 males
Eligible but not enrolled
59 (29%) 39 (35%) 20 (23%)
*Reasons for non-enrollment (N=59):(i) Newly tested, needed time to decide:11 (19%)(ii) Lacked own mobile phones: 29 (49%)(iii) Went to consult with the partner:13 (22%)(iv) Refused: 6 (10%)
Baseline Characteristics
Age* 26 years (18-27 years)
Gestational age* 24 weeks (16-32 weeks)
Own phone 21/30 (70%)
Share phone 4/30 (13.3%)
Face to face discussion with health provider about PMTCT
15/30 (50%)
Used phone (SMS or voice) to discuss PMTCT with health provider
2/29 (7%)
*Median
HIV Status
28/30 women had been given ARVs for PMTCT during this pregnancy
Study Timeline
• July 2012 - February 2013 – enrollment• January-March 2013 – Focus group discussions
• CHWs and Study Participants
– Costing• November 2013 – complete data collection• December 2013 – February 2014 – Data analysis– Cost effectiveness analysis
• April 2014 – Final report
Study Limitations
• Factors not addressed by intervention that have an effect on PMTCT service delivery– high staff rotation and turnover
• lost contact with clients
– commodity stock-outs– transportation costs to health facilities– culturally influenced infant feeding practices– limited technical capacity of community health
workers within PMTCT– lack of male-friendly services
Acknowledgements
EGPAF Kenya Dr. John Ong’ech (PI)Dr. Judith KosePeter SavosnickRogers SimuyuRosemary OpiyoAggrey Mutimba
EGPAF Washington DCDr. Rhoderick MachekanoDr. Larissa JenningsSuzanne May
Ministry of Health - Kenya
Dr. Martin Sirengo(co-PI)
World Health OrganizationDr. Nigel Rollins
Funded by the World Health Organization