1 tsec-biosys: shaping the future bioeconomy theme 3: roland clift damiete ogunkunle philip...

14
1 TSEC-BIOSYS: Shaping the Future Bioeconomy www.tsec-biosys.ac.uk Theme 3: Roland Clift Damiete Ogunkunle Philip Sinclair Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey Biomass role in the UK energy futures The Royal Society, London: 28 th & 29 th July 2009 TSEC Biosys TSEC Biosys TSEC Biosys TSEC Biosys

Upload: dinah-adams

Post on 16-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 TSEC-BIOSYS: Shaping the Future Bioeconomy  Theme 3: Roland Clift Damiete Ogunkunle Philip Sinclair Centre for Environmental Strategy,

1

TSEC-BIOSYS: Shaping the Future Bioeconomy

www.tsec-biosys.ac.ukTheme 3:

Roland Clift Damiete Ogunkunle

Philip Sinclair

Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of SurreyBiomass role in the UK energy futures

The Royal Society, London: 28th & 29th July 2009

TSEC BiosysTSEC Biosys

TSEC BiosysTSEC Biosys

Page 2: 1 TSEC-BIOSYS: Shaping the Future Bioeconomy  Theme 3: Roland Clift Damiete Ogunkunle Philip Sinclair Centre for Environmental Strategy,

TSEC Biosys

TSEC Biosys

Sustainable developmentand sustainability

• Sustainable development meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs (WCED, 1987)

• Sustainable development involves participatory processes of interaction between the human economy, society and the environment (Mitchell et al, 2004)

• Sustainability is the possibility that humans and other life flourish on the Earth forever (Ehrenfeld, 2008)

• “Acid” test of a sustainable development framework: does it aid processes which support sustainable development to come into being?

Page 3: 1 TSEC-BIOSYS: Shaping the Future Bioeconomy  Theme 3: Roland Clift Damiete Ogunkunle Philip Sinclair Centre for Environmental Strategy,

TSEC Biosys

TSEC Biosys

Multi-Criterion Decision Analysis(MCDA)

• Discrete, qualitative criteria and options for a decision are elicited from participants

• Learning leads to comparisons• Various methods are used to construct a view of

decision maker preferences consistent with a certain set of assumptions (e.g. reference level, value measurement, outranking; Belton and Stewart, 2002; Keeney and Raiffa, 1976)

• Areas of ignorance are recognised; uncertainties are due to the consequences of the incompleteness and fallibility of knowledge

Page 4: 1 TSEC-BIOSYS: Shaping the Future Bioeconomy  Theme 3: Roland Clift Damiete Ogunkunle Philip Sinclair Centre for Environmental Strategy,

TSEC Biosys

TSEC Biosys

Scenarios:

“… plausible descriptions of how the future may develop, based on a coherent and internally consistent set of assumptions (“scenario logic”) about key relationships and driving forces…”

(Nakicenovic et al., UNDP, 2000)

Page 5: 1 TSEC-BIOSYS: Shaping the Future Bioeconomy  Theme 3: Roland Clift Damiete Ogunkunle Philip Sinclair Centre for Environmental Strategy,

TSEC Biosys

TSEC Biosys

Characteristics of Biomass as an Energy Source:

Versatile but this means:• Multiple possible supply chains• Multiple possible uses • Different possible scales of implementation• No established infrastructure or market

i.e. both more complex and more complicated than other primary energy sources, with much scope for confusion of policy…

Page 6: 1 TSEC-BIOSYS: Shaping the Future Bioeconomy  Theme 3: Roland Clift Damiete Ogunkunle Philip Sinclair Centre for Environmental Strategy,

TSEC Biosys

TSEC Biosys

Bioenergy: scales of operation

RCEPRCEPscenariosscenarios

Geographical and temporal scales for bioenergy technologies, comparative activities and scenarios (after Connors, 2007)

Page 7: 1 TSEC-BIOSYS: Shaping the Future Bioeconomy  Theme 3: Roland Clift Damiete Ogunkunle Philip Sinclair Centre for Environmental Strategy,

TSEC Biosys

TSEC Biosys

Narratives

• Methods have been devised for writing narratives from qualitative systems models (e.g., Hector et al, 2007)

• Within this project, this method has been tested for the UK bioenergy system in a “narrative workshop”

• The evaluation of a narrative depends on the “decision frame” of the reader. The frame that a reader adopts is controlled partly by the content of the narrative and partly by the norms, habits and personal characteristics of the reader (Tversky and Kahneman, 1981).

• A set of narratives from this workshop, written for different audiences, are in evaluation with a range of different readers

Page 8: 1 TSEC-BIOSYS: Shaping the Future Bioeconomy  Theme 3: Roland Clift Damiete Ogunkunle Philip Sinclair Centre for Environmental Strategy,

TSEC Biosys

TSEC Biosys

Systematic Process to Construct Narratives:

1. Workshop to: identify influences;

construct qualitative system model.

2. Use system model as a basis for writing “narratives” to explain options and possible scenarios and to inform quantitative modelling.

Page 9: 1 TSEC-BIOSYS: Shaping the Future Bioeconomy  Theme 3: Roland Clift Damiete Ogunkunle Philip Sinclair Centre for Environmental Strategy,

TSEC Biosys

TSEC Biosys

An example of a Trilemma - “The Archers Trilemma”

ECO-CENTRISM

SOCIAL EQUITY

FREE-MARKET CAPITALISM

SD

Ideals Avarice

Eco-system services

Page 10: 1 TSEC-BIOSYS: Shaping the Future Bioeconomy  Theme 3: Roland Clift Damiete Ogunkunle Philip Sinclair Centre for Environmental Strategy,

TSEC Biosys

TSEC Biosys

The Trilemma System Map

Page 11: 1 TSEC-BIOSYS: Shaping the Future Bioeconomy  Theme 3: Roland Clift Damiete Ogunkunle Philip Sinclair Centre for Environmental Strategy,

TSEC Biosys

TSEC Biosys

Evaluation of this approach:

The effectiveness of the narratives is proven if

• (a) their informational content is consistent irrespective of the narrator

• (b) the learning of the reader is independent of the writing of the narrators

• EFFICIENCY – Very time-consuming…

Page 12: 1 TSEC-BIOSYS: Shaping the Future Bioeconomy  Theme 3: Roland Clift Damiete Ogunkunle Philip Sinclair Centre for Environmental Strategy,

TSEC Biosys

TSEC Biosys

Future Directions

• Apply this approach to structuring other problems characterised by a large number of diverse influences and forces.

• Use qualitative and quantitative models to inform each other.

Page 13: 1 TSEC-BIOSYS: Shaping the Future Bioeconomy  Theme 3: Roland Clift Damiete Ogunkunle Philip Sinclair Centre for Environmental Strategy,

TSEC Biosys

TSEC Biosys

Biomass Resources for Heat

Utopia Dystopia

Forestry biomass

Forestry biomass

Utopia

DystopiaWaste

biomass

Waste biomassUtopia

Dystopia

Agriculture

biomass

Agriculture

biomass

Ecosystem services

Rural economic development

“Likely” future

“Desirable” future

“As-Is”

Forestry products (available for energy)Forestry residuesClean wood industrial by-products

Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste (OFMSW)Sewage sludgeCommercial industrial waste (mainly F&D industry)Other industrial co-products (e.g. black liquor)

Energy crops (woody and grassy)Agricultural residues (straw and other)

Waste minimisation

Page 14: 1 TSEC-BIOSYS: Shaping the Future Bioeconomy  Theme 3: Roland Clift Damiete Ogunkunle Philip Sinclair Centre for Environmental Strategy,

TSEC Biosys

TSEC Biosys Interaction between

qualitative and quantitative (MARKAL) modelling:

Qualitative system models define the systems, i.e. supply chains and uses, to be represented in the MARKAL model scenarios.

Narratives condense the outcome of the MARKAL scenarios in a way which (should) make(s) them intelligible to a non-specialist (and possibly non-quantitative) audience

– SEE EXAMPLES