1 synthesis imaging workshop error recognition r. d. ekers narrabri, 20 sep 2006

34
Paul Rayner 2001 1 Synthesis Imaging Synthesis Imaging Workshop Workshop Error recognition R. D. Ekers Narrabri, 20 Sep 2006

Post on 15-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Paul Rayner 2001 1

Synthesis Imaging WorkshopSynthesis Imaging Workshop

Error recognitionR. D. Ekers

Narrabri, 20 Sep 2006

R. Ekers 2

SummarySummary

Follows Chapter 10 “Error Recognition” in NRAO Synthesis Workshop closely

Educational– Use of basic concepts and analogies

– Fourier transform practice

Practical information for diagnosing errors Diagnostic tools Making discoveries

Larson cartoonLarson cartoon

12 May 2003 4

Cygnus ACygnus A

Raw dataVLA continuum

DeconvolutionUses non-linear algorithms to

correcting for errors due to missing information in the Fourier domain

Self CalibrationUses the corrupted image of the

object to remove antenna based gain errors

5

Image or Aperture Plane?Image or Aperture Plane?

Most errors occur in the measurements (aperture plane) but effect the science in the image plane

Errors obey Fourier transform relations:– narrow features transform to wide features (and visa versa)

– symmetries important - real/imag, odd/even, point/line/ring

Some errors more obvious in particular domain– switch between image and uv planes

The transform of a serious error may not be serious!– effects are diluted by the number of other samples

Paul Rayner 2001 6

Bad Scan - Visibilities:Bad Scan - Visibilities:

Flagged:Unflagged:

Only two scans on 1/15 baselines affected.

Paul Rayner 2001 7

Bad Scan - Images:Bad Scan - Images:

Flagged:Unflagged:

Paul Rayner 2001 8

Bad Gain - Visibilities:Bad Gain - Visibilities:

Properly Calibrated:2.5% Gain error one ant:

Gain error affects all visibilities on 5/15 baselines

Paul Rayner 2001 9

Bad Gain - Visibilities:Bad Gain - Visibilities:

Properly Calibrated:2.5% Gain error:

S.T. Myers - 8th Synthesis Summer School 20 June 2002

10

The 2D Fourier TransformThe 2D Fourier Transform

x,y (radians) in tangent plane relative to phase center spatial frequency u,v (wavelengths) adopt the sign convention of Bracewell:

S.T. Myers - 8th Synthesis Summer School 20 June 2002

11

The Fourier TheoremsThe Fourier Theorems

shift in one domain is a phase gradient in the other

multiplication in one domain is convolution in the other

R.Ekers 12

Fourier SymmetriesFourier Symmetries

symmetries determined by Fourier kernel real sky brightness Hermitian uv plane

– complex conjugate of visibility used for inverse baseline

exp( i φ ) = cos φ + i sin φ

– Real & Even Real & Even

– Real & Odd Imag & Odd

Symmetric image errors are often due to amplitude errors

image errors with odd symmetry or asymmetric often due to phase errors

S.T. Myers - 8th Synthesis Summer School 20 June 2002

17

Error DiagnosisError Diagnosis

amplitude or phase errors:– phase errors usually asymmetric or odd symmetry– amplitude errors usually symmetric (even)

short duration errors:– localized in uv plane distributed in image plane– narrow extended orthogonal direction in image

long timescale errors:– ridge in uv plane corrugations in image– ring in uv plane concentric “Bessel” rings in image

Adapted from Myers 2002 18

Example Gain Error - 2Example Gain Error - 2

10 deg phase error

anti-symmetric ridges

20% amp error

symmetric ridges

S.T. Myers - 8th Synthesis Summer School 20 June 2002

19

Example Gain Error - 3Example Gain Error - 3

10 deg phase error 1 ant all timesrms 2.0 mJy

rings – odd symmetry

20% amp error 1 ant all timesrms 2.3 mJy

rings – even symmetry

Adapted from Myers 2002 20

Additive Additive

some errors add to visibilities – additive in conjugate plane

– examples: noise, confusion, interference, dc offsets, cross-talk, variable source, source outside field (eg sun)

Paul Rayner 2001 21

DC offset:DC offset:Additive error - Image planeAdditive error - Image plane

Paul Rayner 2001 22

DC offset:DC offset:Additive error - aperture planeAdditive error - aperture plane

Paul Rayner 2001 23

DC offset:DC offset:Additive error - Image planeAdditive error - Image plane

S.T. Myers - 8th Synthesis Summer School 20 June 2002

24

Multiplicative Multiplicative

others multiply or convolve visibilities– multiplication convolution in conjugate planes

» examples - multiplicitive: sampling, gain errors, atmosphere, missing spacings

» Examples - convolution: primary beam, gridding

25

Image errors caused by rotation of Image errors caused by rotation of the primary beam (alt-az telescope)the primary beam (alt-az telescope)

Gain error in UV plane= Convolution in image

plane Stokes Q image

showing effect of off-axis instrumental polarization

HII region in direction of the HESS gamma ray source

Robert Reinfrank

Paul Rayner 2001 26

CLEAN Errors in the Image:CLEAN Errors in the Image:

Paul Rayner 2001 27

CLEAN errors in UV-plane:CLEAN errors in UV-plane:

Paul Rayner 2001 29

Effect of missing short baselinesEffect of missing short baselines

No short baselines

S.T. Myers - 8th Synthesis Summer School 20 June 2002

30

Radially Dependent ErrorsRadially Dependent Errors

not expressible as simple operations in image/uv plane–sometimes convertible to standard form via coordinate change

smearing effects–bandwidth: radial - like coadding images scaled by frequency

–time-average: tangential – baselines rotated in uv plane

baseline, shadowing pointing

–dependent on source position in the field

–polarization effects worse (e.g. beam squint)

Paul Rayner 2001 31

Non-linear processing errorsNon-linear processing errors

2 ATCA snapshots– Only 30 visibilities

measured

– Deconvolution interpolates 104 additional points

– Selfcal adds 10 more degrees of freedom!

Paul Rayner 2001 32

Surprising non-linear effectsSurprising non-linear effects

Polarization– Stokes parameters U and Q

» Have gausian noise

» Obey the convolution algorithm

» But not very easy to interpret

– P= U2+Q2 » Noise biased and not gausian

» Not a convolution of the sky with anything

» Angular resolution can appear to be infinite!

– P/I and θ are even worse

R Ekers 33

DiagnosticsDiagnostics

Good image display– Negativity

– Complex numbers

Polarization Low resolution image of large field Source subtraction Fourier transform Statistics

34

IRAM-GIPSYIRAM-GIPSY

Single bad point

(& conjugate)

Bad point removed

Stripes in image

Stripes gone!

image UV plane

35

IRAM-GIPSYIRAM-GIPSY

Paul Rayner 2001 36

DiscoveriesDiscoveriesRadio emission from Cyg X2Radio emission from Cyg X2

WSRT 21cm Braes and Miley

(1972)

Variable source only present in 1

day of a 4 day synthesis

Paul Rayner 2001 37

DiscoveriesDiscoveriesFlare in Flare in RS CVn system II PegRS CVn system II Peg

– WSRT 83cm

38

Galactic CentreGalactic Centre

VLA 6cm Big picture missed by

first observers

39

Galactic CentreGalactic Centre

VLA 6cm Big picture missed by

first observers Too much resolution

too small FOV