1 statistical thermodynamics dr. henry curran nui galway
TRANSCRIPT
1
Statistical Thermodynamics
Dr. Henry CurranNUI Galway
2
Background
Thermodynamic parameters of stable molecules can be found. However, those for radicals and transition state species cannot be readily found. Need a way to calculate these properties readily and accurately.
3
The Boltzmann Factor
Tfxconst
EfQuantityPhysical
T
Eexp
kT
j
i ji
n
n /exp in
jn
i
jji
Boltzmann law for the population of quantised energy states:
4
Average basis of the behaviour of matter
Thermodynamic properties are concerned with average behaviour.
kT
j
i ji
n
n /exp
The instantaneous values of the occupation numbers are never very different from the averages.
5
Distinct, independent particles
• Consider an assembly of particles at constant temperature. These particles are
• distinct and labelled (a, b, c, … etc)• They are independent
– interact with each other minimally– enough to interchange energy at collision
• Weakly coupled – Sum of individual energies of labelled particles
i
idcbaE ...
6
Statistical weightsAt any instant the distribution of particles among energy states involve n0 with energy 0, n1 with energy 1, n2 with energy 2 and so on. We call the instantaneous distribution the configuration of the system.
• At the next moment the distribution will be different, giving a different configuration with the same total energy.
• These configurations identify the way in which the system can share out its energy among the available energy states.
7
Statistical weightsA given configuration can be reached in a number of different ways. We call the number of ways the statistical weight of that configuration. It represents the probability that this configuration can be reached, from among all other configurations, by totally random means.For N particles arriving at a configuration in which there are n0 particles with energy 0, n1 with etc, the statistical weight is:
...!!!!
!
3210 nnnn
N
8
Principle of equal a priori probabilities
• Each configuration will be visited exactly proportional to its statistical weight
i
inN i
iinE
• We must find the most probable configuration– How likely is this to dominate the assembly?– For an Avogadro number of particles with an average
change of configuration of only 1 part in 1010 reduces the probability by:
434max 10 A massive collapse
in probability!
9
Maximisation subject to constraints
• The predominant configuration among N particles has energy states that are populated according to:
ieN
ni
where and are constants under the conditions of constant temperature
10
The lowest state has energy 0 = 0 and occupation number n0
which identifies the constant , and enables us to write:
i
ii
en
n
eN
nee
N
n
i
i
0
0
eN
n0
ieN
ni
11
this is a temperature dependent ratio since the occupation number of the states vary with temperature
The constant can be stated as:
ien
ni 0
kT
1
where k is the Boltzmann constant
12
Molecular partition function
i
i
ji
enn
enn
en
n
i
kTi
kT
j
i
0
/0
/
0
Any state population (ni) is known if: i, T, and n0 are known
13
Molecular partition function
q
Nen
qewritingore
Nen
e
Nn
enenenennN
nnnnnN
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
statesallstatesall
i
statesall
statesall
statesalli
0
00000
3210
...
...
321
If the total number of particles is N, then:
14
Molecular partition function, q
Determines how particles distribute (or partition) themselves over accessible quantum states.
kTeeeq
1,0...1 0
321
An infinite series that converges more rapidly thelarger both the energy spacing between quantum states and the value of is. Convergence is enhanced at lower temperatures since = 1/kT.
when >> 0, e-
15
Molecular partition function, q
• If 1-0 () is large (kT)
– q 1 (lowest value of q)
• If 1-0 () ≈ kT (thermal energy)
– q large number
magnitude of q shows how easily particles spread over the available quantum states and thus reflects the accessibility of the quantum energy states of the particles involved.
16
Energy states and energy levels
levelsall
jjegq
statesall
ieq
However, quantum states can be degenerate with a number (g) of states all sharing the same energy. States with the same energy comprise an energy level and we use the symbol gj to denote the degeneracy of the jth level
17
The partition function explored
The total number of particles in our assembly is N or, expressed intensively, NA per mole
0
0
n
Nq
qnngnN
A
levelsalljj
statesalliA
The partition function is a measure of the extent to which particles are able to escape from the ground state
18
The partition function explored
The partition function q is a pure number which can range from a minimum value of 1 at 0 K (when n0 = NA and only the ground state is accessible) to an indefinitely large number as the temperature increases
Fewer and fewer particles are left in the ground state and an indefinitely large number of states become available to the system
19
The partition function explored
We can characterise the closeness of spacing in the energy manifold by referring to the density of states function, D(), which represents the number of energy states in unit energy level.
• If D() is high (translational motion in gas): – particles find it easy to leave ground state – q will rise rapidly as T increases
• If D() is low (vibrations of light diatomic molecules)– small value of q ( 1)
20
The partition function explored
• If q/NA (the number of accessible states per particle) is small– few particles venture out of the ground state
• If q/NA is large– there are many accessible states and molecules are
well spread over the energy states of the system
• q/NA >> 1 for the valid application of the
Boltzmann law in gaseous systems
21
Canonical partition function
• Molecular molar level– assume value of an extensive function for N
particles is just N times that for a single particletrue for energy of non-interacting particles but not so for other properties (e.g. entropy)
• Particles do interact! Thus we consider:– every system has a set of system energy
states which molecules can populate– these states are not restricted by the need
for additivity but can adjust to any inter-particle interactions that may exist
V
m
qLE
ln
22
Canonical partition function• Molar sum over states
– each possible state of the whole system involves a description of the conditions experienced by all the particles that make up a mole
Suppose N identical particles each with the set of individual molecular states available to them.
Particle labels 1, 2, 3, 4, …, NMolecular states a, b, c, d, …
23
Canonical partition functionAny given molar state can be described by a suitable combination of individual molecular states occupied by individual molecules. If we call the ith state Ψi, we can begin to give a description of this molar state by writing:
...
...8765432187654321tckcfhbai
tckcfhbai
E
with energy:
there is no restriction on the number of particles that can be in the same molecular state (e.g. particles 5 & 7 are both in molecular state c)
24
Canonical partition function (QN)
State Ψi, with energy Ei is just one of many states of the whole system. The predominant molecular configuration is called the canonical distribution – applies to states of an N-particle system– at constant amount, volume, and Temperature
V
Nim
statessystem
N
QEE
eQ i
lnwith energy:
25
The Molar energy
The canonical partition function (QN) is much more general than “the product of N molecular partition functions q” since there is no need to consider only independent molecules
VV
qN
q
q
NE
ln
V
Nim
QEE
ln
26
The Molar energy
If we are able to calculate thermodynamic properties for assemblies of N independent particles using q and for N non-independent particles using QN, then, in the limit of the particles of QN, becoming less and less strongly interdependent, the two methods should eventually converge.
27
The Molar energy
Note that the expressions:
V
N
V
QqN
lnln
and
are compatible if we assume that the two different partition functions are related simply by: NqQwhere Q is a function of an N-particle assembly at constant T and V
28
Distinguishable and indistinguishable particles
itckcfhba
tckcfhbai
Q
E
...exp
...
87654321
87654321
for the canonical partition function we can write:
In every one of the i system states, each particle (1, 2, 3, …) will be in one of its possible j molecular states (a,b, c, d …) just once in each system state. If we factorise out each particle in turn from the summation over the system states and then gather together all the terms that refer to a given particle, we get:
29
Distinguishable and indistinguishable particles
...
321
statesmolecular
statesmolecular
statesmolecular
jjj eeeQ
If all molecules are of the same type and indistinguishable by position they do not need labelling
N
N
j
qeQ j
30
Distinguishable and indistinguishable particles
If particles are indistinguishable the number ofaccessible system states is lower than it is fordistinguishable ones. A system Ψi
...321
...321
bhaj
hbai
differs from a state Ψj
if particles are distinguishable, because of the interchange of particles 2 and 3 between states b and h. However, Ψi is identical to Ψj if particles are indistinguishable
31
Distinguishable and indistinguishable particles
In systems which are not at too high a density and are also well above 0 K, the correction factor for this over-counting of configurations is 1/N!
particles) ishableindistingufor
particles)habledistinguisfor
(
(
!N
qQN
N
32
Two-level systemsThe simplest type of system is one which comprises particles with only two accessible states in the form of two non-degenerate levels separated by a narrow energy gap :
un
ln
0
0
At temperatures that are comparable to /k only the ground state and first excited state are appreciably populated
33
Effect of increasing Temperature
The average population ratio of the two levels is an assembly of such two-level (or two-state) particles is given by:
k
een
n
L
T
l
u L
2
/2
where the two-level temperature (2L) is defined as:
34
Temperature Dependence of the populations
)0(14.0
)(5.0
)1(82.0
)(5
5.0/1
2
5/1/
2
2
2
en
nthen
TlowTif
eeen
nthen
ThighTif
TkT
l
u
L
T
l
u
L
L
L
Comparing energy gap with background thermal energy
Comparing characteristic T (2L) with Temperature (T)
35
T dependence of populations
Ne
Ne
en
Ne
eN
en
Nne
Nnn
nen
l
u
u
ul
ul
1
1
1
11
1
1
but total number of particles is constant
36
T dependence of populations (Fig. 6.2)
T00.1 1 10
0.0
0.5
1.0
nu
nl
nu
mb
er o
f p
arti
cles
/ N
Reduced temperature T/2L
T
37
Two-level Molecular partition function
• The effect of increasing T– only two energy
states to consider)1(0
)1(
20
)(2
0
00
eqif
ee
eeeq
L
statesboth
Li
High T Low T T = 52L T = 0.52L
q2L = 1 + 0.82 q2L = 1 + 0.14
q2L 2 q2L 1
Both states equally only lower state accessible accessible
38
The energy of a two-level system
1
2
11
1
1
0
eNe
N
xNe
nxnxnenE uuli
iiL
At high T, half the particles occupy the upper state and the total energy takes the value ½ N
39
Two-level heat capacity, CV
The spacing of energy levels in discussing two-level systems is not affected by changes in volume, so the relevant heat capacity is CV not CP
T
U
T
UC
VV
Variation of CV with T is a measure of how accessible the upper states becomes as T increases.
40
Two-level heat capacity, CV
• Low T– kT is small – small T has little tendency to excite particles– overall energy remains constant => CV low
• Intermediate T– kT is comparable to – small T has larger effect in exciting particles– CV is somewhat larger
• High T– Almost half particles in excited state– small T causes very few particles excited to
upper– Overall energy remains constant => CV low
41
Two-level heat capacity, CV
22
2
2
1
2
1)(
1
1
e
eNkC
kTeeN
dT
dE
eNE
V
L
42
Variation of CV and Energy of a two-level system as a function of reduced Temperature
0.1 1 100.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
E/E
max
CV/N
k
Reduced temperature (T/)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.44Nk
0.42
43
The effect of degeneracy
Consider a two-level system with degenerate energy levels. If the degeneracy of the lower level is g0 and that of the upper level is g1 then the two-level molecular partition function is:
)( 102 eggq L
44
The effect of degeneracy
egg
Ngg
E
0
1
0
1
Energy of the degenerate two-level system:
and the heat capacity:
2
0
1
0
1
2
egg
egg
Nk
CV
45
Toolkit equations
V
VVV
T
V
T
QkTQkSEntropy
T
QkT
T
QkTCcapacityHeat
V
QkTpstateofEquation
T
QkTUUenergyInternal
QkT
AAbridgeMassieu
lnln:.5
lnln2:.4
ln:.3
ln)0(:.2
ln)0(
:.1
2
22
2
46
Toolkit equations
T
TV
V
QkTVQkTGGenergyfreeGibbs
V
QkTV
T
QkTHHEnthalpy
lnln)0(:.7
lnln)0(:.6 2
In order to relate the partition function to classical thermodynamic quantities, the equations for internal energy and entropy are needed. Once these have been expressed in terms of the canonical partition function, Q, the Massieu bridge can be derived. This in turn provides the most compact link to classical thermodynamics.
47
Ideal monatomic gas
Consider an assembly of particles constrained to move in a fixed volume. This system consists of many, non-interacting, monatomic gas particles in ceaseless translational motion. The only energy that these particles can possess is translational kinetic energy.
48
Translational partition function, qtrs
In classical mechanics, all kinetic energies are allowed in a system of monatomic gas particles at a fixed volume V and temperature T. Quantum restrictions place limits on the actual kinetic energies that are found. To determine the partition function for such a system to need to establish values for the allowed kinetic energies. We consider a particle constrained to move in a cubic box with dimensional box with dimensions lx, ly, and lz.
49
Particle in a one-dimensional boxThe permitted energy levels, x, for a particle of mass m that is constrained by infinite boundary potentials at x = 0, and x = lx to exist in a one-dimensional box of length lx are given by:
2
22
8 x
xx m
hn
l
and similarly for the y- and z-directions. The translational quantum number, nx, is a positive integer and the quantum numbers in the y- and z-directions are ny and nz, respectively.
50
One-dimensional partition function
The one-dimensional partition function, qtrs,x, is obtained by summing over all the accessible energy states. Thus:
222 8/,
xx mhn
nallxtrs eq l
an expression that is exact but cannot be evaluated except by direct and tedious numerical summation.
51
One-dimensional partition function
For all values of lx in any normal vessel, these energy levels are very densely packed and lie extremely close to each other. They form a virtual continuum, so the summation can be replaced by an integration with the running variable nx
h
mq
dneq
xtrs
xmhn
xtrsxx
x
l
l2
1
,
0
8/,
2
222
resulting in the expression:
52
Extension to three dimensions
3
2
3
,,,
2
h
mqxqxqq ztrsytrsxtrstrs
zyx lll
We can factorise the translational partition function:
product of three dimensions gives the volume, V:
Vh
mkTV
h
mqtrs
2
3
2
2
3
2
22
53
Extension to three dimensions
For the canonical partition function for N indistinguishable particles
NN
Ntrs
trs Vh
mkT
NV
h
m
NN
2
3
2
2
3
2
2
!
12
!
1
!
54
Testing the continuum approximationAt its boiling temperature of 4.22 K, one mole of He occupies 3.46 x 10-4 m3. How many translational energy states are accessible at this very low temperature, and determine whether the virtual continuum approximation is valid.
)(105.4
)1046.3()22.410003.4)(10942.5(
)()/10942.5(
)(2
24
42
3330
2
3
2
5
2
332
530
2
32
3
2
unitlessx
xxxx
VMTKkgmmolx
VMTNh
kq
Atrs
55
Ideal monatomic gas: thermodynamic functions
Since all classical thermodynamic functions are related to the logarithm of the canonical partition function, we start by taking the logarithm of Qtrs:
!lnln3lnln2
3)2ln(
2
3ln NhNVNTNmNQtrs
56
Ideal monatomic gas: thermodynamic functions
V
N
V
Q
T
N
T
Q
T
N
T
Q
T
trs
V
trs
V
trs
ln
2
3ln
2
3ln
22
2
57
The translational energy, Etrs
For a monatomic gas, the translational kinetic energy, Etrs, is the only form of energy that the monatomic particles possess, so we can equate it directly to the internal energy, U, and substitute the value of the derivative:
RTU
NkTT
QkTUE
m
V
trstrs
2
3
2
3ln2
(for one mole N = NA, NAk = R)
58
The equation of state
This can be derived using:
RTpVorV
RTp
V
NkT
V
QkTp
mm
T
trs
ln
(for one mole N = NA, NAk = R)
59
The heat capacity, CV
This can be derived using:
RC
NkNkNk
T
QkT
T
QkTC
mV
V
trs
V
trsV
2
3
2
3
2
33
lnln2
,
2
22
(for one mole N = NA, NAk = R)
60
Entropy of an ideal monatomic gasAll of the simplifying factors that result from taking partial derivatives of ln Qtrs no longer hold
!lnln3lnln2
3)2ln(
2
3ln
lnln
NhNVNTNmNQ
T
QkTQkS
trs
V
trstrs
lnQtrs is a direct term and so all variables appear
)!lnln(ln!
1ln
!
1lnln
NqNkqN
k
qN
kQk
N
Ntrs
61
Entropy of an ideal monatomic gas
Next, using Stirling’s approximation (lnN! ≈ NlnN – N)
pN
RT
Nh
MkTRS
N
V
h
mkTNkS
N
qNkNk
N
qNkS
N
qNkNNNqNkQk
AAm
trs
2
3
2
2
3
2
2ln
2
5
2ln
2
5
ln2
5
2
3ln1
ln1)lnln(ln
One mole: (N = NA, NAk = R, NAm = M and V = RT/p
62
Entropy of an ideal monatomic gas
gathering together all experimental variables (M. T, p)
2
52
3
2
2
5
2
3
)(2
lnln ekhN
Rp
TMRS
Am
The Sackur-Tetrode Equation
The first term contains all of the experimental variables, the second consists of constants
63
Using the Sackur-Tetrode equationThe second term has a value of 172.29 J K-1 mol-1 or 20.723 R. Thus we can write:
72320)/()/(/ln/ 12
3
2
31 .PapKTmolkgMRSm
Argon Krypton
Tb / K 87.4 120.2
Scalc / R 15.542 17.451
Scalor / R 15.60 17.43
Some calculated and measured entropies
64
Using the Sackur-Tetrode equationThe Sachur-Tetrode equation can also be written as using ln p-1 = ln V – ln R – ln T
RMRTRVRSm 605.18ln2
3ln
2
3ln
where the variables are expressed in SI units (V/m3, T/K, and M/kg mol-1)
65
Significance of Sackur-Tetrode equation
1
2
1
2
1
2
ln
ln2
3ln
T
TC
T
TRS
V
VRS
V
VT
the last two terms (3/2 R lnM and 18.605 R) could not have been foreseen from classical thermodynamics
volume
dependencetemperaturedependence
RMRTRVRSm 605.18ln2
3ln
2
3ln
the first two terms are known from classical thermodynamics
66
Change in conditions
Effect of increase in T, V, or M on:
D() Q U p CV S
T nil nil
V nil nil nil
M nil nil nil
67
Ideal diatomic gas: internal degrees of freedom
• Polyatomic species can store energy in a variety of ways:
– translational motion– rotational motion– vibrational motion– electronic excitation
Each of these modes has its own manifold
of energy states, how do we cope?
68
Internal modes: separability of energies
• Assume molecular modes are separable – treat each mode independent of all others– i.e. translational independent of vibrational,
rotational, electronic, etc, etc
Entirely true for translational modesVibrational modes are independent of:– rotational modes under the rigid rotor
assumption– electronic modes under the Born-
Oppenheimer approximation
69
Internal modes: separability of energies
Thus, a molecule that is moving at high speed is not forced to vibrate rapidly or rotate very fast.
An isolated molecule which has an excess of any one energy mode cannot divest itself of this surplus except at collision with another molecule.
The number of collisions needed to equilibrate modes varies from a few (ten or so) for rotation, to many (hundreds) for vibration.
70
Internal modes: separability of energies
Thus, the total energy of a molecule j:
jel
jvib
jrot
jtrs
jtot
71
Weak coupling: factorising the energy modes
• Admits there is some energy interchange – in order to establish and maintain thermal
equilibrium
• But allows us to assess each energy mode as if it were the only form of energy present in the molecule
• Molecular partition function can be formulated separately for each energy mode (degree of freedom)
• Decide later how individual partition functions should be combined together to form the overall molecular partition function
72
Weak coupling: factorising the energy modes
• Imagine an assembly of N particles that can store energy in just two weakly coupled modes and
• Each mode has its own manifold of energy states
and associated quantum numbers
• A given particle can have:- -mode energy associated with quantum number k
- -mode energy associated with quantum number r
rktot
73
Weak coupling: factorising the energy modes
The overall partition function, qtot:
statesall
totrieq
)(
expanding we would get:
...
)()()()(
)()()()(
)()()()(
)()()()(
33231303
32221202
31211101
30201000
eeee
eeee
eeee
eeeeqtot
74
Weak coupling: factorising the energy modes
but e(a+b) = ea.eb, therefore:
...
......
......
......
221202
211101
201000
eeeeee
eeeeee
eeeeeeqtot
each term in every row has a common factor of
in the first row, in the second, and so on. Extracting these factors row by row:
0e 1e
75
Weak coupling: factorising the energy modes
...
...)(
...)(
...)(
...)(
32103
32102
32101
32100
eeeee
eeeee
eeeee
eeeeeqtot
the terms in parentheses in each row are identical and form the summation:
statesall
je
76
Weak coupling: factorising the energy modes
statesallstatesall
statesalltot
jj
j
exe
eeeeeq
...3210
If energy modes are separable then we can factorise the partition function and write:
qxqqtot
77
Factorising translational energy modes
jztrs
jytrs
jxtrs
jtottrs ,,,,
which allows us to write:
ztrsytrsxtrstrs
stateszallstatesyallstatesxalltrs
statesallstatesalltrs
qxqxqq
exexeq
eeq
ztrsytrsxtrs
ztrsytrsxtrstottrs
,,,
)(
,,,
,,,,
Total translational energy of molecule j:
78
Factorising internal energy modes
elvibrottrstot qqqqq ...using identical arguments the canonical partition function can be expressed:
elvibrottrstot QQQQQ ...
Total translational energy of molecule j:
but how do we obtain the canonical from the molecular partition function Qtot from qtot? How
does indistinguishability exert its influence?
79
Factorising internal energy modes
When are particles distinguishable (having distinct configurations, and when are they indistinguishable?
• Localised particles (unique addresses) are always distinguishable
• Particles that are not localised are indistinguishable– Swapping translational energy states between such
particles does not create distinct new configurations
• However, localisation within a molecule can also confer distinguishability
80
Factorising internal energy modes
When molecules i and j, each in distinct rotational and vibrational states, swap these internal states with each other a new configuration is created and both configurations have to be counted into the final sum of states for the whole system. By being identified specifically with individual molecules, the internal states are recognised as being intrinsically distinguishable.
Translational states are intrinsically indistinguishable.
81
Canonical partition function, Q
This conclusion assumes weak coupling. If particles enjoy strong coupling (e.g. in liquids and solutions) the argument becomes very complicated!
Nelvibrottrstot
Nel
Nvib
Nrot
Ntrs
tot
qqqqN
Q
qqqN
...!
1!
and thus:
82
Ideal diatomic gas: Rotational partition function
Assume rigid rotor for which we can write successive rotational energy levels, J, in terms of the rotational quantum number, J.
1
12
2
2
)1(
)1(8
)1(8
cmJBJ
cmJJIc
h
hc
E
JJI
hE
JJ
J
joules
where I is the moment of inertia of the molecule, is the reduced mass, and B the rotational constant.
83
Ideal diatomic gas: Rotational partition function
Another expression results from using the characteristic rotational temperature, r,
)()1(8 2
2
jouleskJJE
hcBkk
hcB
Ik
h
rJ
rr
• 1st energy increment = 2kr
• 2nd energy increment = 4kr
84
Ideal diatomic gas: Rotational partition function
Rotational energy levels are degenerate and each level has a degeneracy gJ = (2J+1). So:
TJJkTJrot
rJ eJegq /)1(/ )12(
If no atoms in the atom are too light (i.e. if the moment of inertia is not too small) and if the temperature is not too low (close to 0 K), allowing appreciable numbers of rotational states to be occupied, the rotational energy levels lie sufficiently close to one another to write:
85
Ideal diatomic gas: Rotational partition function
2
2
0
/)1(
8
)12(
h
IkTTq
eJq
rrot
dJTJJrot
r
• This equation works well for heteronuclear diatomic molecules.
• For homonuclear diatomics this equation overcounts the rotational states by a factor of two.
86
Ideal diatomic gas: Rotational partition function• When a symmetrical linear molecule rotates
through 180o it produces a configuration which is indistinguishable from the one from which it started. – all homonuclear diatomics
– symmetrical linear molecules (e.g. CO2, C2H2)
• Include all molecules using a symmetry factor
rrot
Tq
= 2 for homonuclear diatomics, = 1 for heteronuclear diatomics = 2 for H2O, = 3 for NH3, = 12 for CH4 and C6H6
87
Rotational properties of molecules at 300 K
r/K T/r qrot
H2 88 2 3.4 1.7
CH4 15 12 20 1.7
HCl 9.4 1 32 32
HI 7.5 1 40 40
N2 2.9 2 100 50
CO 2.8 1 110 110
CO2 0.56 2 540 270
I2 0.054 2 5600 2800
88
Rotational canonical partition function
Nrotrot qQ
relates the canonical partition function to the molecular partition function. Consequently, for the rotational canonical partition function we have:
NNN
rrot h
IkT
hcB
TTQ
2
28
89
Rotational Energy
2
28lnlnln
h
IkNTNQrot
this can differentiated wrt temperature, since the second term is a constant with no T dependence
molecules)diatomic(forNkTU
TT
NkTT
QkTU
rot
V
rotrot
ln
ln 22
90
Rotational heat capacity
molecules)(linearRC
RTU
mrot
mrot
,
,
this equation applies equally to all linear molecules which have only two degrees of freedom in rotation. Recast for one mole of substance and taking the T derivative yields the molar rotational heat capacity, Crot, m. Thus, when N = NA, the molar rotational energy is Urot,m
molecules)diatomic(forNkTU rot
91
Rotational entropy
53.106//ln/ 12 KTmkgIRSrot
Srot is dependent on (reduced) mass (I = r2), and there is also a constant in the final term, leading to:
2
2
2
2
8lnln1
8ln
lnlnln
h
kITNkS
h
IkTk
T
NkT
QkT
UQk
T
QkTS
rot
N
rot
Vrot
92
Rotational entropy
282 1010 trsrot qbutq
Typically, qrot at room T is of the order of hundreds for diatomics such as CO and Cl2. Compare this with the almost immeasurably larger value that the translational partition function reaches.
93
Extension to polyatomic molecules
2
1
,,,
zryrxrrot
TTTq
• In the most general case, that of a non-linear polyatomic molecule, there are three independent moments of inertia.
• Qrot must take account of these three moments – Achieved by recognising three independent characteristic
rotational temperatures r, x, r, y, r, z corresponding to the three principal moments of inertia Ix, Iy, Iz
• With resulting partition function:
94
Conclusions
• Rotational energy levels, although more widely spaced than translational energy levels, are still close enough at most temperatures to allow us to use the continuum approximation and to replace the summation of qrot with an integration.
• Providing proper regard is then paid to rotational indistinguishability, by considering symmetry, rotational thermodynamic functions can be calculated.
95
Ideal diatomic gas: Vibrational partition function
Vibrational modes have energy level spacings that are larger by at least an order of magnitude than those in rotational modes, which in turn, are 25—30 orders of magnitude larger than translational modes.– cannot be simplified using the continuum
approximation– do not undergo appreciable excitation at room
Temp.
– at 300 K Qvib ≈ 1 for light molecules
96
The diatomic SHO modelWe start by modelling a diatomic molecule on a simple ball and spring basis with two atoms, mass m1 and m2, joined by a spring which has a force constant k.The classical vibrational frequency, oscis given by:
Hzk
osc
2
1
There is a quantum restriction on the available energies:
...),2,1,0(2
1
voscvib hv
97
The diatomic SHO model
The value is know as the zero point energy
• Vibrational energy levels in diatomic molecules are always non-degenerate.
• Degeneracy has to be considered for polyatomic species
– Linear: 3N-5 normal modes of vibration– Non-linear: 3N-6 normal modes of vibration
osch2
1
98
Vibrational partition function, qvib
• Set 0 = 0, the ground vibrational state as the reference zero for vibrational energy.
• Measure all other energies relative to reference ignoring the zero-point energy.
– in calculating values of some vibrational thermodynamic functions (e.g. the vibrational contribution to the internal energy, U) the sum of the individual zero-point energies of all normal modes present must be added
99
Vibrational partition function, qvib
The assumption (0 = 0) allows us to write:
Thvib
hhhvib
vib
vib
eeq
eeeeq
hhhh
/
32
4321
1
1
1
1
...1
...,4,3,2,
Under this assumption, qvib may be written as:
a simple geometric series which yields qvib in closed form:
where vib = h/k = characteristic vibrational temperature
100
Vibrational partition function, qvib
• Unlike the situation for rotation, vib, can be identified with an actual separation between quantised energy levels.
• To a very good approximation, since the anharmonicity correction can be neglected for low quantum numbers, the characteristic temperature is characteristic of the gap between the lowest and first excited vibrational states, and with exactly twice the zero-point energy, .
osch2
1
101
Ideal diatomic gas: Vibrational partition function
Vibrational energy level spacings are much larger than those for rotation, so typical vibrational temperatures in diatomic molecules are of the order of hundreds to thousands of kelvins rather than the tens of hundreds characteristic of rotation.
Species vib/Kqvib
(@ 300 K)
H2 5987 1.000
HD 5226 1.000
D2 4307 1.000
N2 3352 1.000
CO 3084 1.000
Cl2 798 1.075
I2 307 1.556
102
Vibrational partition function, qvib
• Light diatomic molecules have:
– high force constants – low reduced masses
• Thus:– vibrational frequencies (osc) and characteristic vibrational
temperatures (vib) are high
– just one vibrational state (the ground state) accessible at room T
• the vibrational partition function qvib ≈ 1
k
osc 2
1
103
Vibrational partition function, qvib
• Heavy diatomic molecules have:– rather loose vibrations – Lower characteristic temperature
• Thus:– appreciable vibrational excitation resulting in:
• population of the first (and to a slight extent higher) excited vibrational energy state
• qvib > 1
104
Vibrational partition function, qvib
• Situation in polyatomic species is similar complicated only by the existence of 3N-5 or 3N-6 normal modes of vibration.
• Some of these normal modes are degenerate
(1), (2), (3), … denoting individual normal modes 1, 2, 3, …etc.
Species vib/K∏(qvib)
(@ 300 K)
CO2 3360 1.091
1890
954(2)
NH3 4880(2) 1.001
4780
2330(2)
1360
CHCl3 4330 2.650
1745(2)
1090(2)
938
523
374(2)
...)3()2()1()( xqxqxqqq vibvibvibnvib
totvib
105
Vibrational partition function, qvib
As with diatomics, only the heavier species show values of qvib appreciably different from unity.
Typically, vib is of the order of ~3000 K in many molecules. Consequently, at 300 K we have:
in contrast with qrot (≈ 10) and qtrs (≈ 1030)
For most molecules only the ground state is accessible for vibration
11
110
e
qvib
106
High T limiting behaviour of qvib
At high temperature the equation gives a linear dependence of qvib with temperature.
If we expand , we get:
Tvib vibeq /1
1
Tvibe /1
vibvibvib
T
Tq
...)/(11
1High T limit
107
T dependence of vibrational partition function
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.41.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
qvi
b
Reduced Temperature T/
As T increases, the linear dependence of qvib upon T becomes increasingly obvious
108
The canonical partition function, Qvib
Using we can find the first
differential of lnQ with respect to
temperature to give:
VT
QkTU
ln2
N
TNvibvib vibeqQ
/1
1
1ln
/2
T
vib
Vvib vibe
Nk
T
QkTU
109
The vibrational energy, Uvib
This is not nearly as simple as:
)1( /, T
vibmvib vibe
RU
RTU
kTU
mrot
mtrs
,
, 2
3
linear molecules
110
The vibrational energy, Uvib
This does reduce to the simple form at equipartition (at very high temperatures) to:
)1( /, T
vibmvib vibe
RU
Re
RU
RTU
mvib
mvib
7
1
)1(
300010,
,
Normally, at room T:
(equipartition)
111
The zero-point energy• So far we have chosen the zero-point energy
(1/2h) as the zero reference of our energy scale
• Thus we must add 1/2h to each term in the energy ladder
• For each particle we must add this same amount– Thus, for N particles we must add U(0)vib, m = 1/2Nh
hNe
R
Ue
RU
ATvib
mvibTvib
mvib
vib
vib
2
1
)1(
)0()1(
/
,/,
112
Vibrational heat capacity, Cvib
The vibrational heat capacity can be found using:
2/
/2,
, )1(
T
Tvib
V
mvibmvib vib
vib
e
e
TR
T
UC
The Einstein Equation
This equation can be written in a more compact form as:
T
RC vibEmvib
F,
113
Vibrational heat capacity, Cvib
FE with the argument vib/T is the Einstein function
The Einstein function
Tu
e
eu vibu
u
E
2
2
)1(F
114
The Einstein heat capacity
0.1 1 100.0
0.5
1.0
FE
Reduced temperature T/
High Tlow T
115
The Einstein function
• The Einstein function has applications beyond normal modes of vibration in gas molecules.
• It has an important place in the understanding of lattice vibrations on the thermal behaviour of solids
• It is central to one of the earliest models for the heat capacity of solids
116
The vibrational entropy, Svib
vibvibvib
vibvibvibvibvib
QkT
UUT
AA
T
UUS
ln)0(
)0()0(
Nvibvib qQ • We know and N = NA for one mole, thus:
TT
vibmvib
vibvibAvib
vib
vibe
e
T
R
S
qRqkNQ
//
, 1ln)1(
/
lnlnln
117
Variation of vibrational entropy with reduced temperature
0.1 1 100.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Svi
b/R
Reduced temperature T/
TT0
118
Electronic partition function• Characteristic electronic temperatures, el,
are of the order of several tens of thousands of kelvins.
• Excited electronic states remain unpopulated unless the temperature reaches several thousands of kelvins.
• Only the first (ground state) term of the electronic partition function need ever be considered at temperatures in the range from ambient to moderately high.
119
Electronic partition function
It is tempting to decide that qel will not be a significant factor. Once we assign 0 = 0, we might conclude that:
1)(00/,
i
kTel termshighereeq iel
To do so would be unwise!One must consider degeneracy of the
ground electronic state.
120
Electronic partition function
The correct expression to use in place of the previous expression is of course:
00
0/
)(0, gtermshigheregegqi
kTiel
iel
Most molecules and stable ions have non-degenerate ground states. A notable exception is molecular oxygen, O2, which has a ground state degeneracy of 3.
121
Electronic partition functionAtoms frequently have ground states that are degenerate. Degeneracy of electronic states determined by the value of the total angular momentum quantum number, J.Taking the symbol as the general term in the Russell—Saunders spin-orbit coupling approximation, we denote the spectroscopic state of the ground state of an atom as:
spectroscopic atom ground state = (2S+1)J
122
Electronic partition functionspectroscopic atom ground state = (2S+1)Jwhere S is the total spin angular momentum quantum number which gives rise to the term multiplicity (2S+1). The degeneracy, g0, of the electronic ground states in atoms is related to J through:
g0 = 2J+1 (atoms)
123
Electronic partition functionFor diatomic molecules the term symbols are made up in much the same way as for atoms.
• Total orbital angular momentum about the inter-nuclear axis. Determines the term symbol used for the molecule ( etc. corresponding to S, P, D, etc. in atoms).As with atoms, the term multiplicity (2S+1) is added as a superscript to denote the multiplicity of the molecular term.
124
Electronic partition functionIn the case of molecules it is this term multiplicity that represents the degeneracy of the electronic state.For diatomic molecules we have:
spectroscopic molecular ground state = (2S+1)
for which the ground-state degeneracy is:g0 = 2S + 1 (molecules)
125
Electronic partition function
SpeciesTerm
Symbol gn el/K
Li 2S1/2 g0 = 2
C 3P0 g0 = 1
N 4S3/2 g0 = 4
O 3P2 g0 = 5
F 2P3/2 g0 = 42P1/2 g1 = 2 590
NO 21/2 g0 = 223/2 g1 = 2 178
O23-
g g0 = 31g g1 = 1 11650
126
Electronic partition functionWhere the energy gap between the ground and the first excited electronic state is large the electronic partition function simply takes the value g0.
When the ground-state to first excited state gap is not negligible compared with kT (el/T is not very much less than unity) it is necessary to consider the first excited state.The electronic partition function becomes:T
eleleggq /
10
127
Electronic partition function
For F atom at 1000 K we have:
109.524 1000/590/10 eeggq T
elel
674.322 1000/178/10 eeggq T
elel
For NO molecule at 1000 K we have: