1 space charge sign inversion and electric field reconstruction in 24 gev proton irradiated mcz si p...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Space charge sign inversion Space charge sign inversion and electric field reconstruction and electric field reconstruction
in 24 GeV proton irradiated in 24 GeV proton irradiated MCZ Si pMCZ Si p++-n(TD)-n-n(TD)-n++ detectors detectors
processed via thermal donor introductionprocessed via thermal donor introduction
Z. LiBrookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, USA
E. Verbitskaya, V. Eremin, Ioffe Physico-Technical Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences
St. Petersburg, RussiaJ. Härkönen
Helsinki Institute of Physics, CERN/PH, Geneva, Switzerland
10 RD50 Collaboration WorkshopVilnius, Lithuania, June 4-6, 2007
*This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy: Contract No. DE-AC02 -98CH10886
2
OutlineOutline
1. Background: specific features/advantages of p-type Si for development of radiation-hard detectors
2. Experimental: samples; measurement technique
3. Experimental results on TCT pulses after 24 GeV/c proton irradiation: SCSI in p+-n(TD)-n+ detectors
4. Approach for simulation of detector Double Peak response and E(x) profile reconstruction with a consideration of electric field in the “neutral” base
5. New method for E(x) reconstruction
6. Results on E(x) reconstruction in protons irradiated p+-n(TD)-n+ detectors
7. Comparison of E(x) profile reconstructed from TCT data and E(x) profile simulated with a consideration of carrier trapping
Conclusions
Z. Li et al., 10th RD50 Workshop, Vilnius, Lithuania, June 4-6, 2007
3
Specific features and advantages of p-type Si for development of radiation-hard detectors
Recently development of Si detectors based on the wafers from p-type Magnetic Czochralski (MCZ) silicon became an attractive way for radiation hardness improvement [1]. The main advantage is that the major signal arises from electron collection which leads to efficient detector operation [2], and the detector is non-inverting after irradiation. Along with this, a single sided process can be used to fabricate n+-p-p+ detectors that facilitate device fabrication.
1. J. Härkönen et al., Proton irradiation results of p+-n-n+ Cz-Si detectors processed on p-type boron-doped substrates with thermal donor-induced space charge sign inversion, NIM A 552 (2005) 43-48.2.G. Casse et al., NIM A 518 (2004) 340.
4
Experimental
Samples:
p-type MCZ Si, as-processed p+-p-n+ structure (processed at HIP)
Treatment:
annealing at 430 C, Thermal Donor (TD) introduction
Conversion to p+-n(TD)-n+
Irradiation: 24 GeV/c protons at CERN PS (Thanks to Maurice!) 7 fluences (81012 p/cm2 to 51014 p/cm2)
Experimental technique: TCT (measured at BNL and PTI)
V. Eremin, N. Strokan, E. Verbitskaya and Z. Li, NIM A 372 (1996) 388-298
5
SCSI in MCZ p+-n(TD)-n+ detectors
SC + SC – (SCSI)
100 V160 V
200 V300 V
Laser front
180 V
200 V
250 V
300 V
Laser back
8x1012 p/cm2
Laser front
100 V
120 V
160 V200 V
2x1013 p/cm2
100 V
120 V160 V
200 V
Laser back
Laser front
200 V
230 V
250 V
300 V
Laser back
10 V
50 V
100 V
150 V
180 V
6x1013 p/cm2
SC – (SCSI)
6
SCSI in MCZ p+-n(TD)-n+ detectors
DP, SC - (SCSI) 2.14x1014 p/cm2
Laser front
258 V268 V278 V
288 V
Laser front
220 V230 V240 V
250 V
Laser front
308 V
328 V
347 V
367 V
0 V
9 V18 V
27 V
Laser back Laser back
37 V56 V
94 V142 V210 V
Laser back
230 V
268 V308 V
347 V
367 V
7
SCSI in MCZ p+-n(TD)-n+ detectors
DJ, SC - (SCSI), symmetrical TCT pulses 4.2x1014 p/cm2
Laser front Laser front
18 V
43 V
69 V87 V
105 V
132 V
160 V178 V
Laser back Laser back
18 V
43 V
69 V87 V
105 V
132 V
160 V178 V
8
Vfd vs. Fp dependence
# Fp (cm-2) SC V_fd (Q_V) 47 8.00E+12 positive 20049 2.00E+13 negative 4515 6.00E+13 negative 25059 1.48E+14 DP to (-) 30069 2.14E+14 DP to (-) 34026 4.18E+14 DJ48 5.05E+14 DJ
n320, p+-n(TD)-n+, Vfd vs. Fp
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0.0E+00 5.0E+13 1.0E+14 1.5E+14 2.0E+14 2.5E+14
Fluence (p/cm2)
Fu
ll d
eple
tio
n v
olt
age
(V)
9
Approach for simulation of detector Double Peak response and E(x) profile reconstruction
with a consideration of electric field in the “neutral” base
Transient current:
Ntr = f(F)
effto ed
EQti /
p+ n+
E1
Eb
E2
W1 Wb W2
h
trthtr Nv
1
Three regions of heavily irradiated detector structure are considered Reverse current flow creates potential difference and electric field in
the neutral base
1) E. Verbitskaya et al. NIM A 557 (2006) 528;2) E. Verbitskaya, pres. RESMDD’6, NIM A (in press)Initiated by PTI, developed in:
10
New method for DP E(x) profile reconstruction
Developed at BNL
Method:• based on three region model;• describes induced current pulse arisen from carrier drift
• initial extraction of charge loss due to trapping “corrected” pulse response
t(F) – known from reference data (e.g. H.W. Kraner et al, NIM A326 (1993) 350-356,
and G. Kramberger et al., NIM A481 (2002) 297)
• fitting of the “corrected” current pulse response best matches the “corrected” current pulse response in: 1) the heights of the two current pulse peaks; 2) the shape and position of the minimum; 3) the time interval between the two current pulse peaks.
tdro t
d
vQti /exp)(
d
vQFttiti dro
neqtcorrected )(/exp)()(
sdr vxE
xEv
/)(1
)(
11
Results on E(x) reconstruction in proton irradiated p+-n(TD)-n+ detectors: proof of SCSI
E(x) reconstruction is made for DP pulses
It gives the final proof of the sign of space charge (Neff)
Laser front (p+), e
Laser front
258 V268 V278 V
288 V
Laser front
308 V
328 V
347 V
367 V
Responses to be simulated
N320-69Fp = 2.14·1014 cm-2
0
0.0005
0.001
0.0015
0.002
0.0025
0.003
0.0035
0.00E+00 1.00E-08 2.00E-08 3.00E-08 4.00E-08 5.00E-08
time (s)
sig
nal
(V
)
raw datatrapping extractedsimulation
p+ n+
E1
Eb
E2
W1 Wb W2
h
p+ n+
E1
Eb
E2
W1 Wb W2
h
E1 E2
Eb
W1 W2Wb
p+n+
12
Procedure of E(x) reconstruction
Variable parameters: E1, E2, Eb
W1, Wb Edx = V
d = W1 + Wb + W2
n320-69, Fp = 2.14 cm-2, V = 258 V
-0.0005
0
0.0005
0.001
0.0015
0.002
0.0E+00 1.0E-08 2.0E-08 3.0E-08 4.0E-08 5.0E-08 6.0E-08
time (s)
sig
na
l (V
)
raw data
baselineextractedtrappingextracted
Laser p+ side, e
t0
0.0E+00
5.0E-04
1.0E-03
1.5E-03
2.0E-03
0.0E+00 5.0E-09 1.0E-08 1.5E-08 2.0E-08 2.5E-08
time (s)
Sig
nal
(A
)
experiment, trappingextractedsimulation
258 VLaser p+ side, e
13
Fits of current pulse response at increasing bias voltage
21
3
Fits may be done: - starting from pronounced Double Peak pulse shape - up to its conversion to Single Peak Shape
t = 25 ns
N320-69Fp = 2.14·1014 cm-2
0.0E+00
5.0E-04
1.0E-03
1.5E-03
2.0E-03
2.5E-03
3.0E-03
3.5E-03
0.0E+00 5.0E-09 1.0E-08 1.5E-08 2.0E-08 2.5E-08
time (s)
Sig
nal
(A
)
experiment, trappingextractedsimulation
288 V
Laser p+ side, e
0.0E+00
1.0E-03
2.0E-03
3.0E-03
4.0E-03
5.0E-03
0.0E+00 5.0E-09 1.0E-08 1.5E-08 2.0E-08 2.5E-08
time (s)
Sig
nal
(A
)
experiment, trappingextracted
simulation
308 V
Laser p+ side, e
0.0E+00
5.0E-04
1.0E-03
1.5E-03
2.0E-03
0.0E+00 5.0E-09 1.0E-08 1.5E-08 2.0E-08 2.5E-08
time (s)
Sig
na
l (A
)
experiment, trappingextractedsimulation
258 VLaser p+ side, e
14
Evolution of E(x) profile at increasing bias voltage
At lower V maximal E is near the n+ contact, and W2 2W1
This asymmetric distribution becomes enhanced at higher V.
Finally, positively charged region is immersed by a region with negative charge.
Fp = 2.141014 cm-2
p+
E(x) profile reconstructed from current pulse, n320-69
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03
x (cm)
E (
V/c
m)
258 V
288 V
308 V
328 V
p+
n+
15
Simulation of DP E(x) profile with a consideration of carrier trapping to midgap energy levels:
E(x) and Neff(x) vs. V
Parameters:
introduction rate of generation centers mj
introduction rate of midgap deep levels, DA and DD concentration ratio k = NDA/NDD
bias voltage V temperature T detector thickness d initial resistivity (shallow donor concentration No)
midgap DLs: DD: Ev + 0.48 eV simulation is based on
DA: Ec – 0.52 eV Shockley-Read-Hall statistics
E. Verbitskayapres. RESMDD’6, NIM A (in press)
16
Comparison between E(x) profile reconstructed from current pulse response and E(x) profile simulation considering
thermal carrier trapping to midgap DDs and DAs
1
3
2
Boundary condition for simulation: electric field at the p+ and n+ contacts equals to the electric field obtained from E(x) reconstructed from TCT pulses
Good agreement between two profiles
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03x (cm)
E (
V/c
m)
reconstruction
trapping model
258 V
p+ n+
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03x (cm)
E (
V/c
m)
reconstruction
trapping model288 V
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03
x (cm)
E (
V/c
m)
reconstruction
trapping mode.
308 V
p+
n+
p+
n+
p+
n+
17
E(x) and Neff(x) simulated considering free carrier trapping to midgap DDs and DAs
n320-69
At V 300 V negatively charged region W2
extends over the total detector thickness
Good agreement between E(x)
E(x) profile reconstructed from current pulse
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03
x (cm)
E (
V/c
m)
258 V
288 V
308 V
328 V
p+ n+
E(x) related to trapping
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03
x (cm)
E (
V/c
m)
258 V
288 V
308 V
328 V
p+ n+
Neff related to trapping
-1E+13
-8E+12
-6E+12
-4E+12
-2E+12
0
2E+12
4E+12
6E+12
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03
x (cm)
Ne
ff (
cm
-3)
258 V288 V308 V328 V
p+ n+
Neff
p+
n+
p+
n+
p+
n+
18
Conclusions
SCSI does occur in 24 GeV/c proton-irradiated p+n(TD)-n+ MCZ detectors!
– similar to n-type FZ and DOFZ Si
This finding reverts us to the “puzzle” of space charge sign in 24 GeV proton irradiated n-type MCZ Si detectors –
whether there is a dependence on the sample pre-history? New method of E(x) reconstruction in heavily irradiated Si detectors allows to get nice agreement between experimental “corrected” response independent on fluence, and a simulated response arisen from the carrier drift in detector bulk with three regions of electric field profile
DP
Original n-type MCZ (p+-n-n+), 24 GeV p as-irradiated, 1x1015 p/cm2, V = 360V
Reconstructed E-profile
p+ n+
SCSI?
Laser front (p+), e
19
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by:
• U.S. Department of Energy: contract No: DE-AC02-98ch10886,• INTAS-CERN project # 03-52-5744,• Grant of the President of RF SSc-5920.2006.2.
Thank you for your attention!
This work within the frame works of CERN RD39 and RD50 Collaborations.