1 scalable e-mode n-polar gan misfet devices and process with self-aligned source/drain regrowth...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
218 views
TRANSCRIPT
1
Scalable E-mode N-polar GaN MISFET devices and process with self-aligned source/drain regrowth
Uttam Singisetti*, Man Hoi Wong, Sansaptak Dasgupta, Nidhi, Brian Swenson, Brian Thibeault, Jim Speck, and Umesh Mishra
ECE and Materials DepartmentsUniversity of California, Santa Barbara, CA
2010 Device Research ConferenceUniversity of Notre Dame, South Bend, IN
2
Outline
• Motivation – Why E-mode, N-polar
• Device design and Process– Self-aligned device process– E-mode device design
• Results– Optical gate devices DC and RF data
• Conclusion and Future work
3
Why E-mode GaN devices
GaN devices high speed and high breakdown high Johnston figure of merit D-mode HEMTs with ft ~ 200 GHz, fmax ~ 300 GHz
Motivation for E-mode−Single voltage supply circuit−Simplified circuits−E-mode/D-mode logic circuits
Figure source: . T. Palacios group, MIT
4
Ga-face
GaN buffer
Al(Ga)N2DEG
N-faceBarrier
GaN
Al(Ga)N
2DEG
GaN buffer+++++++++++ Si doping
− Back barrier for electron confinement higher gm
− No higher bandgap AlGaN layer on top low resistance contacts
Scaling advantages of N-polar GaN
Why E-mode, why N-polar GaNN-face
AlGaNGaN
EF
EC
VP
5
Ga-polar E-mode devices with alloyed contacts
Source/drain contacts to highband gap AlGaN layers parasitic source contact resistance high Ron, gm degradation, scaling issues
Higashiwaki, IEEE TED 2006
K.Chen, IEEE TED 2006
Thinning down barrier under the gate
Thicker barrier in the access regions
F- on incorporation under the gate
Thicker barrier in the access regions
6
Self-aligned scaled E-mode devices
− Self-aligned InGaN grade/InN source/drain to reduce access resistance*
− Sub 100 nm gate-lengths velocity overshoot
− Vertical scaling of channel to keep high aspect ratio
Ultra scaled GaN devices: ft, fmax > 200 GHz Figure source: . T. Palacios group, MIT
* S.Dasgupta, APL 2010. Nidhi, IEDM 2009
7
Device structure and design
Under sidewall
20 40 60 80 100
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
GaNchannel
SiN sidewall
EF
n(x)n
(x
101
9 cm
-3)
Depth (nm)
En
erg
y (
eV
)
0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.61.82.0
∫ n(x)dx= 4.5×1012 cm-2
AlN removed under sidewall
Under gate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60-5-4-3-2-1012345
GaN:SiGaN channel
AlNAlN
SiN
Depth (nm)
En
erg
y (e
V)
EF
20 nm channelTop AlN depletes 2-DEG under gate
0 20 40 60 80 100
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
InN
n+ Graded InGaN(In: 0% to 65%)
GaN:SiAlN
GaN channel
EF
En
erg
y (e
V)
Depth (nm)
Under S/D contacts*
* S.Dasgupta, APL 2010. Nidhi, IEDM 2009
9
Device fabrication process
*
* U.Singisetti, pss(c) 2009, EDL 2009.
10
After etch
After etchAs_grown
Al 2p
Ga 3s
Ga 3s
x 104
5
10
15
20
CPS
300 200 100 0Binding Energy (eV)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
n (x
1019
cm
-3)
n(x)
EF
Ene
rgy
(eV
)
Depth (nm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
Selective AlN etch on GaN channel
− Digital etch 5 m UV ozone oxidation, BHF etch
− 2 nm AlN etched in 4 cycles of etching
− XPS on process monitor shows removal of AlN
− Hall measurement gives ns = 3x1012 cm-2, agrees well to simulation
Band diagram after AlN etching
∫ n(x) dx = 3×1012 cm-2
No Al signal after etching
XPS of process monitor sample
11
0 1 2 3 40.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Vds
(V)
I ds(
A/m
m)
Lg= 1 m
Vgs
= 0 to 5 VV
gs,step= 1 V
0 1 2 3 40.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20L
g= 10 m
Vgs
= 0 to 5 VV
gs,step= 1 V
I ds(
A/m
m)
Vds
(V)
DC characteristics of E-mode devices
Imax = 0.2 A/mm for Lg = 10 m device
Imax = 0.6 A/mm for Lg = 1 m device
12
DC characteristics of E-mode devices
0 1 2 3 40.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Lg = 0.55 m, W
g= 100 m
Vgs
= 0 to 5 VV
gs,step= 1 V
I ds(
A/m
m)
Vds
(V)
0 2 4 60.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Lg = 0.55 m
Vds
= 4 V
I ds
(A/m
m)
Vgs
(V)
0
50
100
150
200
250
gm (m
S/m
m)
0 2 4 60.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25L
g = 0.55 m
Vds
= 0.5 V
gm (m
S/m
m)
Vgs
(V)
I ds
(A/m
m)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Imax = 0.7 A/mm
−Vth = 0.8 V at Vds = 4.0V
− Imax = 0.7 A/mm, gm = 250 mS/mm at Vds = 4.0 V
−Imax = 0.22 A/mm, peak gm = 125 mS/mm at Vds = 0.5 V
Vth
13
Low gate leakage
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Vds
= 0.5 V
Vds
= 4.0 V
Lg = 0.55 m
I g (m
A/m
m)
Vgs
(V)
Maximum gate leakage current of 7 mA/mm at Vgs=5 V, and Vds =4.0 V
14
0 1 2 3 40.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0L
g = 0.23 m
Vgs
= -1 to 5 VV
gs,step = 1 V
I ds
(A/m
m)
Vds
(V)
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Vds
(V)
I ds
(A/m
m)
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220Lg = 0.23 m
Vds
= 4 V
gm (m
S/m
m)
0.23 m gate length device
Device no longer E-mode at Lg = 0.23 mm
Imax = 0.9 A/mm, peak gm = 210 mS/mm at Vds = 4.0 V
15
Short channel effect
-1 0 1 2 3 4 50.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Vds
= 4.0 V
Vds
= 3.0 V
Vds
= 0.5 V
Vds
= 0.1 V
Lg = 0.55 m
I ds (
A/m
m)
Vgs
(V)
Threshold voltage decreases with drain bias (Vds)
16
Short channel effect
0 1 2 3 4 5
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.1 1 10
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Vth
Gate length (m)0.1 1 10
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Vth
Gate length (m)
Vds
= 4 V
0.23 m 0.55 m 1 m 10 m
I ds
(A/m
m)
Vgs
(V)
• Vth roll off with gate length
• Device becomes D-mode at Lg= 0.23 m because of low aspect ratio (Lg/t = 230 nm/ 27 nm = 8.5)
• Short channel effect is because of low aspect ratio and self-aligned access regionsNeed more vertical scaling for sub-100 nm E-mode devices
17
Device access resistance
• Source access resistance of 1 -mm, regrowth Rsh = 1000 /□, Rc = 0.2 -mm, high compared to D-mode devices*• Reasons:
• Unintentional grading to In0.3Ga0.7N instead of In0.6Ga0.4N Higher sheet resistance• No InN coverage due to uncalibrated growth temperature Higher Rc
• Rs can be easily reduced
Gate
n+ regrowth
Gate
n+ regrowth
No InN
0 2 4 6 8 100
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Gate lenght, Lg (m)
Ro
n (-
mm
)
Rs + Rd = 2 mm
* S.Dasgupta, APL 2010. Nidhi, IEDM 2009
18
Small-signal characteristics
0.1 1 10-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
Lg = 0.55 m, W
g = 100 m
Vgs
= 3.5 V, Vds
= 3Vft = 18 GHz
h21
(d
B)
frequency (GHz)
19
Conclusions and future work
– Scalable self-aligned N-polar E-mode devices– Vth = 0.8 V for Lg = 0.55 m device
– High current drive > 0.7 A/mm– Peak gm = 250 mS/mm
– Short channel effects observed
–Vertical scaling and gate length scaling– Optimized regrowth
Future work