1 robin hogan estimating cloud particle size using the moon

12
1 Robin Hogan Estimating cloud particle size using the moon

Upload: david-todd

Post on 28-Mar-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Robin Hogan Estimating cloud particle size using the moon

1

Robin Hogan

Estimating cloud particle size using

the moon

Page 2: 1 Robin Hogan Estimating cloud particle size using the moon

2

What causes the coloured rings around the moon?

• Huygens’ principle states that any part of a “wave front” can be treated as its own source of spherical waves.

• This predicts that light (and many other types of wave) will diffract around an obstacle (e.g. cloud particles)

A “wave front”: Maxwell’s interpretation of this is the point of maximum electric field

Direction of incidence of

electromagnetic radiation

Page 3: 1 Robin Hogan Estimating cloud particle size using the moon

3

Superposition principle

• From this we deduce that – The scattering amplitude of the obstacle (NOT including unscattered

radiation) is the negative of the scattering amplitude from the equivalent hole

• But intensity = amplitude squared!– Babinet’s principle: the pattern of scattered intensity from an obstacle is

the same as that from the equivalent hole

Scattering amplitude from an obstacle (including

unscattered radiation)

Scattering amplitude from the equivalent

hole

Original plane wave

+ =

Page 4: 1 Robin Hogan Estimating cloud particle size using the moon

4

Fraunhofer diffraction• The scattering pattern from a

hole is easier to calculate than a particle

• The first minimum occurs when light from opposite sides of hole destructively interferes– Occurs when the distance

travelled differs by half a wavelength

• The scattering pattern will be broader for– Smaller holes (i.e. particles with

smaller radius r)– Longer wavelengths

2

12)(

x

xJI

/2 rx

The first Bessel function in WCD!

Page 5: 1 Robin Hogan Estimating cloud particle size using the moon

5

What about the colours?

• Red light has a longer wavelength, so forms a broader pattern and the characteristic red ringRing radius 2° -> particle radius r=9

mRing radius 3.5° -> particle radius r=5

mRing radius 7° -> particle radius r=2.5

m

• For reference, note that the sun and moon both have an angular diameter in the sky of 0.5°

• The effect is known variously as– Corona– Aureole– Iridescence

Page 6: 1 Robin Hogan Estimating cloud particle size using the moon

6

How well do the predicted colours match the

observations?

Droplets must be nearly all the same size so that the colours don’t wash out

Page 7: 1 Robin Hogan Estimating cloud particle size using the moon

7

Estimating particle size

Radius of red-ring: 3°

Diameter of moon: 0.5°

Droplet diameter: 4.3 m

Ice crystals are larger so produce a smaller aureole

Page 9: 1 Robin Hogan Estimating cloud particle size using the moon

9

Bishop’s ring• Produced by stratospheric aerosol,

usually from a volcano• First exact description of the associated

corona was after the Krakatoa volcano on August 27, 1883

• Sereno Bishop observed it on September 5, 1883 in Honolulu:– Let me draw your special attention to the

very strange corona or halo that extends about 20 to 30 degrees away from the sun. It could be seen here every day, and the whole day long. A whitish veil with a shade of pink and violet or purple shadow in front of the blue background. I don‘t know any other report on such a corona. It is a hardly remarkable object.

• This corresponds to particles of around 1-2 micron in size

“The Scream” (Munch 1893) shows Krakatoa-

induced red skies?

Page 10: 1 Robin Hogan Estimating cloud particle size using the moon

10

Bishop’s ring after Pinatubo in 1991

• Photo taken in Finland in May 1992

Page 11: 1 Robin Hogan Estimating cloud particle size using the moon

11

Page 12: 1 Robin Hogan Estimating cloud particle size using the moon

12

Texas aureole

from Saharan

dust?