1 rms task force on retail market customer/esi transition october 16, 2003

8
1 RMS Task Force on Retail Market Customer/ESI Transition October 16, 2003

Upload: domenic-leonard

Post on 02-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 RMS Task Force on Retail Market Customer/ESI Transition October 16, 2003

1

RMS Task Force on Retail Market Customer/ESI Transition

October 16, 2003

Page 2: 1 RMS Task Force on Retail Market Customer/ESI Transition October 16, 2003

2

Current Status

• Targeted this RMS meeting for “Base” process preferences/recommendations– Retain ESI or Replace/Retire ESI

• Task Force:– has not yet reached consensus

– has had additional discussion re: need to continue work

– has requested PUCT staff input

– has market survey outstanding (responses to be provided 10/22)

– will adjust schedule and deliverables based on review/discussion of survey results

Page 3: 1 RMS Task Force on Retail Market Customer/ESI Transition October 16, 2003

3

Transition Process Alternatives

• Seven process alternatives are being considered– Retain original ESI for service delivery point and transition that ESI from

“losing” TDSP to “gaining” TDSP;

• Alternative X1 – new 814_20 that changes TDSPs

• Alternative X2 – new transaction to switch/drop TDU

• Alternative X6 – manual process to be defined

OR

– Establish new ESI for service delivery point, transition retail service from old ESI to new ESI, retire old ESI

• Alternative X3 – Use existing move in and move out transactions

• Alternative X4 – new 814_20 that copies/creates new ESI

• Alternative X5 – new ESI transfer transaction

• Alternative X7 – manual process to be defined

Page 4: 1 RMS Task Force on Retail Market Customer/ESI Transition October 16, 2003

4

Transition Scenario Variables• Variables that were determined to be important in developing recommendations for

the business processes and transactions to use include:– Time Frame

• Short Term (prior to new trx) vs. Long Term (post system changes) – Transition Date

• Date certain vs. on cycle vs. off-cycle– Volume of ESI IDs in transition

• < 500 • 501 to 5000• > 5000

– “Gaining” TDU territory competitive status• Opt-In IOU vs. Opt-In MCTDU vs. Non Opt-In

– “Losing” TDU status in market• Maintains a presence in Texas market vs. exits Texas market

– TDU tariff applied by “Gaining” TDU• “Gaining” TDU tariff vs. “Losing” TDU tariff vs. N/A

Page 5: 1 RMS Task Force on Retail Market Customer/ESI Transition October 16, 2003

5

Alternative Evaluation CriteriaPotential evaluation criteria

– Impact on customer• Ongoing service (billing etc..)• Impact on Choice

– Lead time for implementation– Cost

• Development• Maintenance• Execution• Post Execution

– Cost per use– Degree of difficulty– Impact of future market activity– Existing Market Constraints

• Protocol Revisions• TX SET Versions• Regulatory Rules

– Impact on Day to Day Processing• Transaction Volumes• Monitoring• In Flight Transactions or Processes

Page 6: 1 RMS Task Force on Retail Market Customer/ESI Transition October 16, 2003

6

Market Survey

• Request for market participants (and ERCOT) to express an initial preference for the appropriate process alternative for a designated scenario (specified combination of variables) and in consideration of the proposed evaluation criteria

– Retain or replace

– Given that preference, which process alternative should be applied

Page 7: 1 RMS Task Force on Retail Market Customer/ESI Transition October 16, 2003

7

Market Survey Excerpt

Customer Transition Task Force

TDSP to TDSP Scenario Matrix

Variables:

Time Frame *On/off cycle Volume Gaining TDU Status Losing TDU Status Tariff Applied

Short Term Date Certain Sm (500 or less) Opt-in IOU Remain in TX Mkt Gaining TDU

Long Term On-cycle Med (501 - 5000) Opt-in MCTDSP Exiting TX Mkt Losing TDU

Off-cycle Lg (> 5000) NOIE NA

* If timeframe is "Short Term", alternatives X1, X2, X4 and X5 are not available

Example Scenarios:

Scenario A (e.g. Highway Relocation) - Short Term/On-Cycle/Sm (500 or less)/NOIE/Remain in TX Mkt/NA

Scenario B - Short Term/On-cycle/Sm (500 or less)/Opt-in IOU/Remain in TX Mk/Gaining TDU

Scenario C - Short Term/On-cycle/Sm (500 or less)/Opt-in IOU/Remain in TX Mk/Losing TDU

Scenario D - Short Term/Date Certain/Sm (500 or less)/Opt-in IOU/Remain in TX Mkt/Losing TDU

Scenario E - Short Term/Date Certain/Med (501 - 5000)/Opt-in MCTDSP/Remain in TX Mkt/Gaining TDU

Scenario F - Short Term/Date Certain/Lg (> 5000)/Opt-in IOU/Remain in TX Mkt/Gaining TDU

ERCOT TDSP Preferred

Time Frame On/off cycle Volume Gaining TDU Status Losing TDU Status Tariff Applied Replace ESI Retain ESI Dealbreaker Dealbreaker Alternative

1 Short Term Date Certain Sm (500 or less) Opt-in IOU Remain in TX Mkt Gaining TDU

2 Short Term Date Certain Med (501 - 5000) Opt-in IOU Remain in TX Mkt Gaining TDU

3 Short Term Date Certain Lg (> 5000) Opt-in IOU Remain in TX Mkt Gaining TDU

4 Short Term Date Certain Sm (500 or less) Opt-in MCTDSP Remain in TX Mkt Gaining TDU

5 Short Term Date Certain Med (501 - 5000) Opt-in MCTDSP Remain in TX Mkt Gaining TDU

6 Short Term Date Certain Lg (> 5000) Opt-in MCTDSP Remain in TX Mkt Gaining TDU

7 Short Term Date Certain Sm (500 or less) NOIE Remain in TX Mkt Gaining TDU NA NA

8 Short Term Date Certain Med (501 - 5000) NOIE Remain in TX Mkt Gaining TDU NA NA

9 Short Term Date Certain Lg (> 5000) NOIE Remain in TX Mkt Gaining TDU NA NA

10 Short Term Date Certain Sm (500 or less) Opt-in IOU Exiting TX Mkt Gaining TDU

11 Short Term Date Certain Med (501 - 5000) Opt-in IOU Exiting TX Mkt Gaining TDU

12 Short Term Date Certain Lg (> 5000) Opt-in IOU Exiting TX Mkt Gaining TDU

Check Preference

Page 8: 1 RMS Task Force on Retail Market Customer/ESI Transition October 16, 2003

8

Next Steps

• Next steps

– Survey responses due COB 10/22

– Task Force meeting scheduled 10/29

• Review survey responses

• Discuss issues or concerns

• Work through process details for scenarios with consensus

– Updated/Revised plan at November RMS