1 realtime application qos monitoring (raqmon) 60 th ietf session – san diego rmon work group...

17
1 Realtime Application QOS Monitoring (RAQMON) 60 th IETF Session – San Diego RMON Work Group Anwar Siddiqui, Avaya Bin Hu, Motorolla Mahfuzur Rahman, Panasonic Eugene Golovinsky, BMC Software Yong Kim, Broadcom <draft-siddiqui-rmonmib-raqmon-tcpsip-00.txt>

Upload: edmund-sherman

Post on 04-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Realtime Application QOS Monitoring (RAQMON) 60 th IETF Session – San Diego RMON Work Group Anwar Siddiqui, Avaya Bin Hu, Motorolla Mahfuzur Rahman,

1

Realtime Application QOS Monitoring (RAQMON)

60th IETF Session – San DiegoRMON Work Group

Anwar Siddiqui, AvayaBin Hu, Motorolla

Mahfuzur Rahman, PanasonicEugene Golovinsky, BMC Software

Yong Kim, Broadcom

<draft-siddiqui-rmonmib-raqmon-tcpsip-00.txt>

Page 2: 1 Realtime Application QOS Monitoring (RAQMON) 60 th IETF Session – San Diego RMON Work Group Anwar Siddiqui, Avaya Bin Hu, Motorolla Mahfuzur Rahman,

2

Motivation

To facilitate real time reporting from embedded devices– embedded device friendly transport binding to carry

RAQMON PDUs within RAQMON specification

RMON WG email thread and email concensus compiled into this draft

Page 3: 1 Realtime Application QOS Monitoring (RAQMON) 60 th IETF Session – San Diego RMON Work Group Anwar Siddiqui, Avaya Bin Hu, Motorolla Mahfuzur Rahman,

3

Options covered in the draft

OPTION A: RAQMON PDU over TCP

OPTION B: RAQMON PDU over SIP Event/Notification

Choice to RMON Work Group

a. Option A only

b. Option B only

c. Option A and B both

Page 4: 1 Realtime Application QOS Monitoring (RAQMON) 60 th IETF Session – San Diego RMON Work Group Anwar Siddiqui, Avaya Bin Hu, Motorolla Mahfuzur Rahman,

4

Functional RAQMON Framework

RAQMON PDU(TCP or SIP or SNMP)

                        

RAQMON Report

Collector (RRC) # 1

(IP Address, port)

SNMPManagement Application

IP End Device

RAQMON Data Source

(RDS)

APPLICATION

RAQMON PDU(TCP or SIP or SNMP)

RAQMON MIB

(IP Address, port)

IP End Device

RAQMON Data Source

(RDS)

APPLICATION

SNMP

RAQMON Report

Collector (RRC) # 2 RAQMON

MIB

Application Communication

Page 5: 1 Realtime Application QOS Monitoring (RAQMON) 60 th IETF Session – San Diego RMON Work Group Anwar Siddiqui, Avaya Bin Hu, Motorolla Mahfuzur Rahman,

5

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | V |PDT = 1|B|T|P|I| RC | Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | DSRC | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | SMI Enterprise Code = 0 | Report Type = 0 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ …………….

…………….…………….

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | …… | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | SMI Enterprise Code = “VENDOR”| Report Type = 0 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

………….………….………….

RMON Reserved

Vendor Extension

RMON Specified Names/Length

“APP filled Value”

“App filled vendor specific Value”

Vendor Specified Names/Length

RAQMON PDU

TCP Transport binding

Option A: RAQMON PDU over TCP

Page 6: 1 Realtime Application QOS Monitoring (RAQMON) 60 th IETF Session – San Diego RMON Work Group Anwar Siddiqui, Avaya Bin Hu, Motorolla Mahfuzur Rahman,

6

Option A: PROS vs. CONS

Basic Transport layer Services within TCP comes for FREE

– Congestion– Fragmentation/De-Fragmentation– Retransmission– Flow control

RAQMON PDU Definition has gone thru iterations within earlier RAQMON PDU work within RMON

– Trivial work to define the TCP binding

Maximal deployment possible in embedded device

– Every IP Device has TCP stack

New Charter ?

PROS CONS

Page 7: 1 Realtime Application QOS Monitoring (RAQMON) 60 th IETF Session – San Diego RMON Work Group Anwar Siddiqui, Avaya Bin Hu, Motorolla Mahfuzur Rahman,

7

Option B: RAQMON PDU over SIP Event

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <raqmonpdu xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rmpdu" xmlns:raqmon="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rmpdu rmpdu.xsd" dsrc="12345">

<smi enterpriseCode="0"> <rc_n id="1">

<ntp>14587393</ntp> <da>1.2.3.4</da> <ra>2.3.4.5</ra> <jitter type="inter-arrival">1234</jitter> <jitter type="absolute">sdfsdf</jitter>

</rc_n> </smi> <smi enterpriseCode=“VENDOR’S SMI">

<extension> [VENDOR SPECIFIC INFO that vendors can define] </extension>

</smi> </raqmonpdu>

NOTIFY sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0 From: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=4442 To: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=78923 Date: Mon, 28 June 2004 03:59:09 GMT Call-Id: k3l43id034kevnx7334s CSeq: 20 NOTIFY Contact: <sip:[email protected]> Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY Event: raqmon Accept: application/sdp, message/sipfrag Subscription-State: active;expires=3600 Content-Type:application/raqmon-pdu+xml Content-Length: ..

New SIP Event Package (IANA Registered)

RAQMON PDU

defined (XML SCHEMA)

SIP NOTIFY HEADER

RMON WG RAQMON PDU

Page 8: 1 Realtime Application QOS Monitoring (RAQMON) 60 th IETF Session – San Diego RMON Work Group Anwar Siddiqui, Avaya Bin Hu, Motorolla Mahfuzur Rahman,

8

Option B: PROS vs. CONS

Basic Transport layer Services within SIP comes for FREE

– Congestion– Fragmentation/De-Fragmentation– Retransmission– Rate Control– Security

XML Schema can be as simple or fancy as it needs to be

Re-use SIP NAT/Firewall Traversal is covered within SIP Framework

WG Re-charter issue

Limited by SIP Deployment in hand devices – not as widely deployed as TCP

PROS CONS

Page 9: 1 Realtime Application QOS Monitoring (RAQMON) 60 th IETF Session – San Diego RMON Work Group Anwar Siddiqui, Avaya Bin Hu, Motorolla Mahfuzur Rahman,

9

Backgrounder

Page 10: 1 Realtime Application QOS Monitoring (RAQMON) 60 th IETF Session – San Diego RMON Work Group Anwar Siddiqui, Avaya Bin Hu, Motorolla Mahfuzur Rahman,

10

RAQMON Network Configuration

Telephone

Laptop computer

Telephone

IP Network

Video/IP/IM/Voice

Voice over IP

Router

Media GatewayFax

Wireless Gateway

Regional Report Collector (Periodic Packets to populate MIB)

LAN/VPN INTRANET

Laptop computer

Corporate Network

Application Administrator

Monitoring Applications via

SNMP

PDANetwork /

Application Service Provider

SNMP

SNMP

SNMP

SNMP

Statistics Reported

Telephone

PDABluetooth

Page 11: 1 Realtime Application QOS Monitoring (RAQMON) 60 th IETF Session – San Diego RMON Work Group Anwar Siddiqui, Avaya Bin Hu, Motorolla Mahfuzur Rahman,

11

RAQMON Context Setting

IP Network

Applications

RTP / FTP/ HTTP

TCP/UDP

MAC IEEE 802.3

PHYSICAL

IP

MAC 802.3

IP

IP End Points Router

PHYSICAL

MAC 802.3

IP

Router

PHYSICAL

Applications

RTP / FTP/ HTTP

TCP/UDP

MAC IEEE 802.3

PHYSICAL

IP

IP End Points

PDAMG

Streaming Media, Transaction, Bulk data transfer etc

Application level priority (e.g. RSVP for S1, but no RSVP for S2)

Various packet level priority ( TOS, DiffServ etc.)

Domain 1

Domain 2 …….

Domain N+1

Multiple Equipment vendors, Multiple geographic locations, Multiple xSPs Control multiple Administrative and Provisioning domain

Domain N

Page 12: 1 Realtime Application QOS Monitoring (RAQMON) 60 th IETF Session – San Diego RMON Work Group Anwar Siddiqui, Avaya Bin Hu, Motorolla Mahfuzur Rahman,

12

RAQMON Framework Definition

RRC

Scope of the Framework

SNMP

RAQMON MIB

RDS RDS

X End DeviceEnd Device

RAQMON PDU is Out of Communication Data Forwarding Path

12

UNDERLYING TRANSPORT

(RTCP, SNMP)

1

2

Communication Data Forwarding Path

RDS/RRC RAQMON PDU Path

(e.g. RTCP, HTTP, FTP, TLS, SIP, H.323)

Communication Data Forwarding Path

Page 13: 1 Realtime Application QOS Monitoring (RAQMON) 60 th IETF Session – San Diego RMON Work Group Anwar Siddiqui, Avaya Bin Hu, Motorolla Mahfuzur Rahman,

13

- Data Source Name (DN) - Receiver Name (RN)- Data Source Address (DA) - Receiver Address (RA) - Data Source Device Port used - Receiver Device Port used - Session Setup Date/Time - Session Setup delay - Session duration- Session Setup Status - End-to-End Delay (Round Trip)- End-to-End Delay (One Way)- Inter Arrival Jitter - Total number of Packets Received - Total number of Packets Sent

- Total number of Octets Received- Total number of Octets Sent - Cumulative Packet Loss - Packet Loss in Fraction (in %)- Source Payload Type - Receiver Payload Type - Source Layer 2 Priority - Destination Layer 2 Priority - Source Layer 3 Priority - Destination Layer 3 Priority - CPU utilization in Fraction (in %)- Memory utilization in Fraction (in %)

- Application Name/version

Current set of suggested metrics …..

Parameters “pushed” from RDS to RRC

Framework Accommodates addition of new parameters to the list …..

Page 14: 1 Realtime Application QOS Monitoring (RAQMON) 60 th IETF Session – San Diego RMON Work Group Anwar Siddiqui, Avaya Bin Hu, Motorolla Mahfuzur Rahman,

14

RAQMON PDU Size - over time

1st PDU for VoIP- Data Source Name (DN) - Receiver Name (RN)- Data Source Address (DA) - Receiver Address (RA) - Data Source Device Port used - Receiver Device Port used - Session Setup Date/Time - Session Setup delay - Session Setup Status - End-to-End Delay (Round Trip)- Inter Arrival Jitter - Total number of Packets

Received - Total number of Packets Sent- Packet Loss in Fraction (in %)- Source Payload Type - Receiver Payload Type - Source Layer 2 Priority - Destination Layer 2 Priority - Source Layer 3 Priority - Destination Layer 3 Priority - CPU utilization in Fraction (in

%)- Memory utilization in Fraction

(in %) - Application Name/version

2nd PDU for VoIP- Data Source Name (DN) - Receiver Name (RN)- End-to-End Delay (Round Trip)- Inter Arrival Jitter - Total number of Packets

Received - Total number of Packets Sent- Cumulative Packet Loss - Packet Loss in Fraction (in %)- CPU utilization in Fraction (in %)- Memory utilization in Fraction (in

%)

………………..

Nth PDU for VoIP- Data Source Name (DN) - Receiver Name (RN)- Session Setup Duration- End-to-End Delay (Round Trip)- Inter Arrival Jitter - Total number of Packets

Received - Total number of Packets Sent- Cumulative Packet Loss - Packet Loss in Fraction (in %)- CPU utilization in Fraction (in

%)- Memory utilization in Fraction

(in %)

tt1 t2 tn

Avg. MTU ~ 1500 Bytes Recommended

NOTIFICATION upto ~ 490 Bytes

Page 15: 1 Realtime Application QOS Monitoring (RAQMON) 60 th IETF Session – San Diego RMON Work Group Anwar Siddiqui, Avaya Bin Hu, Motorolla Mahfuzur Rahman,

15

Suggested RAQMON Use Case Examples Based on Application Type

RAQMON PDU for VoIP- Data Source Name (DN) - Receiver Name (RN)- Data Source Address (DA) - Receiver Address (RA) - Data Source Device Port used - Receiver Device Port used - Session Setup Date/Time - Session Setup delay - Session duration- Session Setup Status - End-to-End Delay (Round Trip)- End-to-End Delay (One Way)- Inter Arrival Jitter - Total number of Packets Received - Total number of Packets Sent- Total number of Octets Received- Total number of Octets Sent - Cumulative Packet Loss - Packet Loss in Fraction (in %)- Source Payload Type - Receiver Payload Type - Source Layer 2 Priority - Destination Layer 2 Priority - Source Layer 3 Priority - Destination Layer 3 Priority - CPU utilization in Fraction (in %)- Memory utilization in Fraction (in %)

- Application Name/version

RAQMON PDU for Instant Messaging

- Data Source Name (DN) - Receiver Name (RN)- Data Source Address (DA) - Receiver Address (RA) - Data Source Device Port used - Receiver Device Port used - Session Setup Date/Time - Session Setup delay - Session duration- Session Setup Status - Total number of Packets

Received - Total number of Packets Sent- Cumulative Packet Loss - Source Layer 3 Priority - Destination Layer 3 Priority - CPU utilization in Fraction (in

%)- Memory utilization in Fraction

(in %) - Application Name/version

RAQMON PDU for Pagers- Data Source Name (DN) - Receiver Name (RN)- Data Source Address (DA) - Receiver Address (RA) - Data Source Device Port used - Receiver Device Port used - Session Setup Date/Time - Session duration- Session Setup Status - Total number of Packets Sent- Application Name/version

Page 16: 1 Realtime Application QOS Monitoring (RAQMON) 60 th IETF Session – San Diego RMON Work Group Anwar Siddiqui, Avaya Bin Hu, Motorolla Mahfuzur Rahman,

16

Congestion Safety

Use TCP as Transport when possible– Scalability of RRCs may be reduced!

If TCP cannot be used following modes of operation are recommended

a. Constant Transmission Rate– 1 RAQMON PDU every 2 minutes (as good as TCP)– End of communication Session– “Engineered” Constant Rate e.g. 1 PDU every 5 sec

b. Retransmission timers with back offs – Ping/Pongs e.g. Process SNMP INFORMS from RRC

c. By restricting transmission to MTU Size

No more than 10% network bandwidth be used for RAQMON

Page 17: 1 Realtime Application QOS Monitoring (RAQMON) 60 th IETF Session – San Diego RMON Work Group Anwar Siddiqui, Avaya Bin Hu, Motorolla Mahfuzur Rahman,

17

RAQMON PDU Transported Over RTCP or SNMP - changes in draft-02

RAQMON PDU over RTCP– RAQMON PDUs inside RTCP APP Packets per RFC 1889– RTCP XR reports can also be used carry RAQMON PDUs

RAQMON PDU over SNMP– Encoding RAQMON PDU by using the RAQMON RDS MIB

– Map the RAQMON PDUs on SNMP Notifications transport

RAQMON PDU

Name=RMON (ascii)

SSRC/CSRC

LengthPT=204Version & subtype

RAQMON specific and

IANA

Registered

RTCP APP Packet