1 project i fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 bladder kidney leukemia lung

52
1 Project I Project I Fall 2009 Fall 2009

Post on 19-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

11

Project IProject I

Fall 2009Fall 2009

Page 2: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

22

Page 3: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

33

Page 4: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

44

Page 5: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

55

2

3

4

5

6

7

BLA

DD

ER

1

2

3

4

5

KID

NE

Y

4

5

6

7

8

9

LEU

KE

MIA

10

15

20

25

30

2 3 4 5 6 7

BLADDER

LUN

G

1 2 3 4 5

KIDNEY

4 5 6 7 8 9

LEUKEMIA

10 15 20 25 30

LUNG

Bladder

Kidney

Leukemia

Lung

Page 6: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

66

Page 7: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

77

Question 1: Excel, Tools, data Question 1: Excel, Tools, data Analysis, Correlation Analysis, Correlation

R2 = r2 for bivariate case

F1, n-2 =[R2/1] ÷ [1-R2 ]/ (n-2) = 0.0784*42/0.9276

F1, 42 = 3.57, critical value @ 5% F1, 40 =4.08

Page 8: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

88

EviewsEviews

Gen eff =@rfdist(1,42)Gen density=@dfdist(eff, 1, 42)

Page 9: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

99

Lung & Kidney CorrelationLung & Kidney Correlation

0

10

20

30

40

50

0 5 10 15

EFF

DE

NS

ITY

4.08 critical3.57

Accept H0

Page 10: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

1010

Page 11: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

1111

Question 1: Excel, Tools, data Question 1: Excel, Tools, data Analysis, Correlation Analysis, Correlation

R2 = r2 for bivariate case

F1, n-2 =[R2/1] ÷ [1-R2 ]/ (n-2) = 0.0784*42/0.9276

F1, 42 = 3.57, critical value @ 5% F1, 40 =4.08

Page 12: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

1212

Page 13: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

1313

Page 14: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

1414

Page 15: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

1515

Page 16: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

1616

Page 17: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

1717

a.

b.

Regression is significantEventhough R2 = 0.50,Other unspecified factorsAr work

Cigarettes smoked per Capita is significant, Prob.7/10,000 happen by chance

Coefficent 0.00445, if cigarettes smoked goes up by one per capita, death rate per 100,000 goes up by 0.004453

Page 18: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

1818

If cigarettes smoked per capita goes up by about 1%, i.e. by25, then death rates for lung cancer go up by 25*0.0044 =0.11125 per 100, 000 or deaths per year increase by 11,125Or 0.11125/ 19.653, or about 0.6%. Called calculating elasticities at means

Page 19: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

1919

Or run a log log regression to estimate elasticity of 0.7

Page 20: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

2020

4. c4. c

0

2

4

6

8

10

-8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Series: ResidualsSample 1 44Observations 44

Mean -2.36E-15Median 0.303458Maximum 7.963441Minimum -7.226050Std. Dev. 2.997614Skewness -0.105521Kurtosis 3.471883

Jarque-Bera 0.489888Probability 0.782748

Page 21: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

2121

Page 22: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

2222

Page 23: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

2323

Copy fitted

Page 24: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

2424

Paste into a open group windowAfter selecting edit

Page 25: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

2525

-10

-5

0

5

10

10 15 20 25 30

FITTED

RE

SID

2.8*10-12

4. d4. d

Page 26: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

2626

Page 27: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

2727

Page 28: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

2828

Page 29: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

2929

White Test for HeteroskedasticityWhite Test for Heteroskedasticity

Page 30: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

3030

In ExcelIn Excel

Page 31: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

3131

Page 32: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

3232

Page 33: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

3333

Page 34: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

3434

Page 35: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

3535

Page 36: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

3636

4e.

Page 37: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

3737

Page 38: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

3838

Q 4e: Do DC and Nevada Bias Q 4e: Do DC and Nevada Bias Results?Results?

Lung Cancer Death Rates Per 100,000 People By State, 1960

Utah

LaDC

Nev

y = 0.0053x + 6.4717

R2 = 0.4864

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500

Cigarettes Smoked Per Capita

De

ath

Ra

tes

Page 39: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

3939

Page 40: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

4040

Page 41: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

4141

a

b

Page 42: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

4242

5.C Are Residuals Normal?5.C Are Residuals Normal?

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5

Series: ResidualsSample 1 44Observations 44

Mean 1.49E-15Median 0.057038Maximum 1.308862Minimum -1.627497Std. Dev. 0.666564Skewness -0.026203Kurtosis 2.795929

Jarque-Bera 0.081384Probability 0.960125

Page 43: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

4343

5.d5.d

-2

-1

0

1

2

2 3 4 5 6 7

FITTEDBLADR

RE

SID

Page 44: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

4444

Bladder Cancer and CigarettesBladder Cancer and CigarettesBladder Cancer Death Rates Per 100,000 Vs. Cigarettes Smoked Per Capita, 1960

Aka

Wisc

NJ

Nev

Mont

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500

Cigarettes Smoked Per Capita

Bla

dd

er

Ca

nc

er

De

ath

Ra

te

Page 45: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

4545

66cigarettes smoked per capita Vs, Income Per Capita By State 1960

AZ

Utah

DCNev

y = 0.9057x + 532.66

R2 = 0.5261

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Income Per Capita $

Cig

are

tte

s P

er

Ca

pit

a

Page 46: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

4646

77

a

b

Page 47: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

4747

7. C Are the Residuals Normal?7. C Are the Residuals Normal?

0

2

4

6

8

10

-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8

Series: ResidualsSample 1 44Observations 44

Mean -2.88E-15Median 0.166719Maximum 8.014785Minimum -7.153882Std. Dev. 2.888455Skewness 0.017645Kurtosis 3.731293

Jarque-Bera 0.982730Probability 0.611791

Page 48: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

4848

Economic and Health SignificanceEconomic and Health Significance• Smoking is hazardous to your health, especially

for lung, bladder and Kidney cancer• Intensity of smoking, e.g cigarettes smoked per

dollar of income and income per capita affect lung cancer death rates– Smoking intensity may be reduced by advertising

health hazards and by imposing an excise tax– Development, as measured by income per capita may

create dangerous toxins that cause lung cancer, e.g. acid rain from coal smoke stacks, particlates in the air, smog etc.

Page 49: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

4949

Beyond The ProjectBeyond The Project

Page 50: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

5050

Lung = a{[(cigs/pop)/(Inc/pop)][Inc/pop]}b exp(e)lnLung = lna + b* cigs/$ + b*(Inc/pop) + elnLung = lna + b*(cigs/pop) – b*(inc/pop) + b(inc/pop) + elnLung = lna + b*(cigs/pop) + e

Page 51: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

5151

Page 52: 1 Project I Fall 2009. 2 3 4 5 Bladder Kidney Leukemia Lung

5252

Bladder Cancer Rate

Lung Cancer Rate

Kidney cancer Rate

Cigarettes/pop Income/pope

eK

eL

eB

Conjecture for 1960