1 physics at forward rapidities how well does pqcd work p+p at 200 and 62 gev probing the initial...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Physics at forward rapidities• How well does pQCD work
• p+p at 200 and 62 GeV• Probing the initial condition
• d+Au collisions at 200 GeV• Final state effects
•Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV
Forward Physics with BRAHMS at RHIC
Dieter RoehrichUniversity of Bergen & CERN
BRAHMS collaboration
2
Introduction
Forward rapidity at RHIC collider offers insight into pp, dA and AA:
• low-x region (for targets like p, A)
• probing larger xF region where kinematic constraints may be important
• opportunities to study if pQCD works at RHIC energies at large rapidities
• energy loss of partons indense matter (central AA collisions)
310-6 10-4 10-2 100
x
108
106
104
102
100
M2 (
GeV
2)
Kinematics
RHIC example• At 4° (y~3 for pions) and pT=1 GeV/c
one can reach values as low of x2 ~ 10-4
• This is a lower limit, not a typical value: most of the data collected at 4° would have x2~0.01
Guzev, Strikman, and Vogelsang (hep-ph/0407201)
y=rapidity of (xL, k) system
1
2
21 process
22 process
4
Parton Distribution Function
x2 range x1 range
Measurements at high rapidity set the dominant parton type:
• projectile (x1 ~1) mostly valence quarks
• target (x2<0.01) mainly gluons
How well does NLO pQCD work at RHIC and at large rapidities?
Are there effects from small-x at large y?
6
pp at 200 GeV – forward rapidity
Calculations done by W. Vogelsang. Only one scale =pT and the same fragmentation functions as used for the PHENIX comparison.
KKP has only 0 fragmentation. Modifications were needed to calculate charged pions. KKP FF does a better job compared to Kretzer, and kaon production still dominated by gg and gq at these rapidities apart from the highest pT
PRL 98 (2007) 252001
No agreement with proton data
7
pp at 62 GeV – forward rapidity
spectra at forward rapidities • Comparison of NLO pQCD calculations (Vogelsang) with BRAHMS data at high rapidity. The calculations are for KKP and a scale factor of =pt (DSS with CTEQ5 and CTEQ6.5 are also shown).
• The agreement is surprisingly good in view of analysis of slightly lower ISR data at large y which failed to describe 0 at larger xF.
DeFlorian, Sassot and Stratman, PRD 75, 114010 (2007)
8
pp at 200 GeV – stopping
Net-proton rapidity distribution
• Despite large systematic uncertainties better agreement with the baryon transport in HIJING/B
9
pp – stopping and longitudinal scaling
Net-proton rapidity distribution
11
• The overall difference between the ratio measured in pp and AuAu is consistent with the favored interpretation based on coalescence in Au+Au
-----------------------------------------
• Large value of ratio in p+p collisions may be driven by proximity to beam rapidity.
• The similarity of the ratio in both systems may be driven by incoherent proton fragmentation.
p/+ in p+p and Au+Au systems at 62.4 GeV
12
Initial and final effects – dAu at 200 GeV
• Initial effectsWang, Levai, Kopeliovich, Accardi
• Especially at forward rapidities:
Eskola, Kolhinen, Vogt, Nucl. Phys. A696 (2001) 729-746
HIJING
D.Kharzeev et al., PLB 561 (2003) 93
• OthersB. Kopeliovich et al., hep-ph/0501260
J. Qiu, I, Vitev,hep-ph/0405068
R. Hwa et al., nucl-th/0410111
D.E. Kahana, S. Kahana, nucl-th/0406074
“Cronin effect”Initial state elastic multiple scattering leading to Cronin enhancement (RAA>1)
Gluon saturationdepletion of low-x gluons due to gluon fusion”Color Glass Condensate (CGC)”
broaden pT
Nuclear shadowingdepletion of low-x partons Anti
ShadowingShadowing
r/ggg
Suppression due todominance of projectile valence quarks, energy loss, coherent multiple scattering, energy conservation, parton recombination, ...
13
Charged hadrons – RdAu at different pseudorapidities
BRAHMS: PRL 93, 242303 (2004)
• Cronin-like enhancement at =0
• Clear suppression as changes from 0 to 3.2
RdAu d2Nd+Au/dpTd
<Ncoll> d2Nppinel/dpTd
where < < Ncoll> = 7.2> = 7.2±0.3
Nuclear Modification Factor
15
RdAu: pions, kaons and protons (y=3)
• RdAu
– Suppression for and K – consistent with charged hadrons
– Less suppression for protons
16
RdAu: pions, kaons and protons
central d+Au
peripheral d+Au
mid-rapidity forward rapidity
18
Comparison pQCD vs CGC
d’Enterria
Conclusions (dAu)• The suppression and in particular the inversion vs. centrality of RdAu at high rapidity may be a signature for the gluon saturation and the small-x evolution.• Stronger gluon shadowing -> EPS08 • Alternate explanations e.g. suppression due to large xF effects work quite well too
LO pQCD calculation (nuclear shadowing) vs CGC
Global analysis of nPDFs including BRAHMS data
K.J. E
skola, H. P
aukkunena, C.A
. Salgadoc,
hep-ph 08020129v1 (2008)
19
Final state effects – A+A collisions
Gallmeister et al., PRC67 (2003) 044905
Fries, Muller, Nonaka, Bass, nucl-th/0301078
Lin, Ko, PRL89 (2002) 202302
R. Hwa et al., nucl-th/0501054
Gyulassy, Wang, Vitev, Baier, Wiedemann…
e.g. nucl-th/0302077
Hadronic absorption of fragments
Energy loss of partons in dense matter
Parton recombination (up to moderate pT)
20
Matter at forward rapidity
BRAHMS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 162301
dn/dy drops by a factor of 3
radial flow drops by 30%
J.I. Jørdre (BRAHMS),PhD thesis (2004)
21
RAuAu: identified hadrons – Au+Au at 200 GeV
• Strong pion suppression
• Enhancement for (anti-)protons
• NO change of RAuAu with rapidity
RAA = d2N/dpTd (A+A)
NColld2N/dpTd (p+p)
protons
BR
AH
MS P
relim
inarypions
22
pQCD + GLV fit to RAA → L/λ
Opacity at forward rapidity
G. G. Barnafoldi et al. Eur. Phys. J. C49 (2007)333
• Co-moving dynamics of jet and longitudinally expanding surface of the compressed matter
• Initial geometry: longitudinally contracted dense deconfined zone
• Less jet quenching but stronger initial state effects at forward rapidities
23
Surface emission
• Medium at RHIC is so dense that only particles produced close to the surface can escape
• Can corona effect mask the lower parton density at =3.2 ?
Dainese, Loizides, Paic,Eur. Phys. J. C38 (2005) 461
24
Conclusions (AuAu)
• Nuclear modification– Strong pion suppression at all rapidities
– Protons are enhanced at all rapidities (RAuAu) and moderate pT
– No dependence of RAuAu on rapidity
26
I.Arsene7, I.G. Bearden6, D. Beavis1, S. Bekele6 , C. Besliu9, B. Budick5, H. Bøggild6 , C. Chasman1, C. H. Christensen6, P. Christiansen6, R. Clarke9,
R.Debbe1, J. J. Gaardhøje6, K. Hagel7, H. Ito10, A. Jipa9, J. I. Jordre9, F. Jundt2, E.B.
Johnson10, C.E.Jørgensen6, R. Karabowicz3, E. J. Kim4, T.M.Larsen11, J. H. Lee1, Y. K.
Lee4, S.Lindal11, G. Løvhøjden2, Z. Majka3, M. Murray10, J. Natowitz7, B.S.Nielsen6,
D. Ouerdane6, R.Planeta3, F. Rami2, C. Ristea6, O. Ristea9, D. Röhrich8, B. H. Samset11, D. Sandberg6, S. J. Sanders10, R.A.Sheetz1, P. Staszel3, T.S. Tveter11, F.Videbæk1, R. Wada7, H. Yang6, Z. Yin8, and I. S. Zgura9
1Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA, 2IReS and Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France3Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland,
4Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA, 5New York University, USA6Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
7Texas A&M University, College Station. USA, 8University of Bergen, Norway 9University of Bucharest, Romania, 10University of Kansas, Lawrence,USA
11 University of Oslo Norway
The BRAHMS Collaboration