1 peter v. nielsen, aalborg university [email protected] smoke ventilation and building design

71
1 Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University [email protected] Smoke Ventilation and Building Design

Upload: gervais-hunt

Post on 04-Jan-2016

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Smoke Ventilation and Building Design

2Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

The lectures

- Introduction and the Danish ”Bygningsreglement”

- Design fire

- The development of thermal smoke ventilation and the Thomas plume model

- Plume flow, the Heskestad plume model and other flow elements

- Mechanical smoke ventilation

- CFD models

- Model experiments

- Evacuation models

3Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Design of Fire Conditions

Design fire

Model for smoke movement

tcritical

Model for evacuation

tevac>

Distribution of people

4Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

The characteristics of a turbulent plume

5Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Virtual origin

y is negative below floor level

If y is equal to 5 m and yo isequal to -1 m, then (y-yo) is equal to 6 m.

6Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Flame height

Found from experiments which relate flame heights toFire load and diameter of fire.

7Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Heskestad, Temperature and Velocity in the Flame

QQc 8.0...6.0

Convective heat emission

8Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Heskestad, mass flow in plume

My for y > L

My for y < L

Mass flow versus height. Mass flow is dependent on flame height.

9Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Free Thermal Plume, Wall Plume and Corner Plume

My = f(Q) My = 0.5•f(2Q) My = 0.25•f(4Q)

10Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Temperature in smoke layer, two methods

1) Simple expression.

2) Advanced expression taking account to heat loss to surroundings:

11Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Radiation

Radiation is a fixed part of the energy release. Typically 30%, but it is dependent on the material which is burning.

– Petrol 0.18– Polystyrene 0.44

12Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Stratified flow below the ceiling

13Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Stratified flow below the ceiling

14Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Flame height and room height

L is free flame height

15Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Flame height and room height

Tid

Forb

ræn

din

gsh

ast

igh

ed

[g /

s m

²]

16Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Critical Size of the Smoke Exhaust to Prevent Plug Holing

mcr (kg/s) , g (m/s2), hs (m) , T (K) and (K) are criticalflow, gravity, thickness of smoke layer, temperature of thesurroundings in Kelvin and excess temperature in the smoke,respectively.

= 1.3 close to a wall and 1.8 far from a wall.

N > M/mcr

where N and M (kg/s) are a minimum number of openings, and a flow rate of smoke which has to be exhausted.

17Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

The lectures

- Introduction and the Danish ”Bygningsreglement”

- Design fire

- The development of thermal smoke ventilation and the Thomas plume model

- Plume flow, the Heskestad plume model and other flow elements

- Mechanical smoke ventilation

- CFD models

- Model experiments

- Evacuation models

18Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Mechanical Smoke Ventilation, 1

The height yst is foundfrom the mass flow Mst

exhausted by the fans.

Based on Thomas’sequation.

19Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Mechanical Smoke Ventilation, 2The Danish Pavilion in Seville 1992

The Danish Pavilion in Seville was equipped with mechanical smoke ventilation. The exhaust fan had a capacity of 10 m3/sec.

20Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Building with Hybrid Ventilation and Mechanical Smoke Ventilation

Office building (KTH-south) in Stockholm. Ventilated by hybrid ventilation.

Smoke ventilation is based on mechanical fan exhaust.

21Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

The lectures

- Introduction and the Danish ”Bygningsreglement”

- Design fire

- The development of thermal smoke ventilation and Thomas plume model

- Plume flow, Heskestad plume model and other flow elements

- Mechanical smoke ventilation

- CFD models

- Model experiments

- Evacuation models

22Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Computer Simulation of Smoke Movement

• Increased accuracy of the predictions• Complex geometry• Small fire load and small buoyancy effect on the smoke• Consideration of other air flows and pressure

distribution in the building• Outside the area of validation of simplified models• Visualization of the predictions• Problems and connections between smoke ventilation

and other functions in the building can be addressed

23Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Fire in a Theatre

Dimensioning of smoke ventilation in a theatre byFLOVENT and FDS

The stage room has a height of 31 m and a floor area of 20 x 20 m

24Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Flovent 4.1

Based on averaged equationsand the k-epsilon model

Direct output is:

Height to smoke layer

Temperature distribution

25Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

FDS 3.1

Based on the fundamental equations and largeeddy simulation

Direct output is:

- Height to smoke layer- Temperature distribution- Radiation from smoke layer- Visibility in the occupied zone

26Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Fire in a Tunnel

The Ofenegg experiments were made in a 131 m long deadend tunnel in Switzerland.

Smoke development in the openingone minute after ignition of 500 lkerosine.

27Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Smoke movement in a tunnel

Measured and predicted velocity profile. The predictionsare based on a zero equation model and on a k-epsilonModel. Fr = 0.34.

28Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Smoke movement in a tunnel

A Low Reynolds Number model improves thepredictions in the small scale situation, butis the smoke movement also semi-laminarin full scale flow?

29Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Dynamic Simulation of Smoke Movement in the Ofenegg Tunnel

The position of smoke after 20, 59 and 114 sec.The speed of the smoke front is 2 m/s shortly after ignition of the fire.

30Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Computer Simulation, Stansted Airport

Airport terminal. Theheight is 13 m and thefloor area is 32000 m2.

Computer animation ofsmoke movement andevacuation.

31Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Computer Simulation, Munich Airport

Railway station at Munichairport.

Simulation of evacuationtime and temperature inthe ceiling structure(stability of the steel struc-ture).

32Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Computer Simulation, Eurotunnel

Design of effective fire detection and fire-fighting system.

33Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Computer Simulation, Tunnel ventilation

Fire in a train. Optimization of ventilation in tunnel.

34Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Computer Simulation, Millennium Dome

Simulation of indoor climate andsmoke ventilation. Real timeprediction of smoke movementduring 30 minutes.

35Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Smoke Movement in an Artium with low Heat Release

The fire is of 15 kW corresponding to the fire in a dustbin. The cold surfaces are 15C, and the warm surfaces are 25C.The initial temperature in the atrium is 23C. The figures show the situation after 100 seconds of fire.

36Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Smoke Movement in an Atrium with Open Storeys (Low Heat Release)

37Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

The lectures

- Introduction and the Danish ”Bygningsreglement”

- Design fire

- The development of thermal smoke ventilation and Thomas plume model

- Plume flow, Heskestad plume model and other flow elements

- Mechanical smoke ventilation

- CFD models

- Model experiments

- Evacuation models

38Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Stratification Height in the Room

Model experiment ona scale of 1 : 15

Height to smoke layer yst versus the Archimedes number Ar

39Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Fire in a Tunnel, 1

The Ofenegg experiments were made in a 131 m long deadend tunnel in Switzerland.

Smoke development in the openingone minute after ignition of 500 lkerosine.

40Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Fire in a Tunnel, 2

Smoke developmentof three differentfires of 100 l, 500 land 1000 l kerosine.

All the experimentsshown were madewith natural ventila-tion from the tunnelopening.

41Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Design of Heat Source

The design makes it possible to work with large Reynolds numbers, or a small scale compared to the full simulation of the heat source.

42Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Model Experiments, 1

Model of a tunnelon a scale of 1 : 20.

Stratified two-zoneflow in the model.

43Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Double Facade

The double facade is open at the top and at the bottom, and it is without any restrictions or divisions.

The important parameters of this problem are the temperature distribution and smoke movement in the double facade

44Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Design of a Fire Source

Fire source

Flow in an office room

45Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Model Experiments with Double Facade

Model experiments with smoke movement in a double facade. Surface distance is 0.3 m.

46Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Gigantium, low effect fire

47Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Low effect fire, model experiment

48Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Plume in temperature gradient

Stratification height is equal to

ym = 0.98·Φk1/4(dT/dy)-3/8 + y0

yst1 = 0.55·ym

yst2 = 0.77·ym

49Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Plume in Temperature

Gradient

ym = 0.75·Φk0.25(dT/dy)-0.26

yst1 = 0.23·Φk0.23(dT/dy)-0.06

yst2 = 0.44·Φk0.21(dT/dy)-0.04

50Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Kings Cross Fire

51Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Kings Cross Fire

52Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Trench Effect

The trench effect was seen to cause hot gases in the buoyant plume to lay along the escalator surface and create a rapid airflow which caused these gases to curl over towards the next steps above. The airflows in the trench increased in proportion to the size of the fire, eventually creating a flamethrower type effect up and into the ticketing hall.

53Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

The lectures

- Introduction and the Danish ”Bygningsreglement”

- Design fire

- The development of thermal smoke ventilation and Thomas plume model

- Plume flow, Heskestad plume model and other flow elements

- Mecahanical smoke ventilation

- CFD models

- Model experiments

- Evacuation models

54Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Design of Fire Conditions

Design fire

Model for smoke movement

tcritical

Model for evacuation

tevac>

Distribution of people

55Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Evacuation Simulation

• Hand calculation

• Simulex

• BuildingEXODUS

56Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Evacuation time

57Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Hand Calculation

Walking velocity when people can move uninfluenced of eachother.This is the case if the density of people is smaller than 1.0 persons/m2 and if people has a normal mobility.Valid for category 1 – 5.

58Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Relationship between Flow Rate and Crowd Density

59Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Walking Velocity and Inter-Person Distance

60Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Hand Calculation

Not the whole width of stairs are used for movement. The width must be reduced with 0.3 m in the calculation of walking time.

The capacity is valid for stairs with an angle of 26o – 32o inrelation to a horizontal surface. Larger angles should be avoided

61Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Peak Flow Rate through Passageways

International Maritime Organisation set ‘maximum’ flow rate through passageways to 1.33 persons/m/s

Denmark: 1 person/m width/sec

62Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Hvad siger virkeligheden?

• Det er sjældent at flugtvejens kapacitet har været kritisk

• Varsling, reaktion og beslutning tager meget længere tid end selve rømningen

• ”Katastrofebrande” er ofte forbundet med et meget hurtigt og volsomt brandforløb

• Den største del af personerne vælger at flygte gennem den samme vej som de kom ind i bygningen gennem

63Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Simulex and Inter-Person space

64Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Simulex – flow Rate versus Door Width

65Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Simulex Evacuation Model

Simulation of 350 people leaving a discotheque in GoteborgIn case of fire

66Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Discotek Stardust

67Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Gigantium

68Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Example : Gigantium in Aalborg

69Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

BuildingEXODUS and World Trade Centre

70Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Validation of Evacuations Models

In general, the programs are able to Predict movement of people with reasonable accuracy.

71Peter V. Nielsen, Aalborg University

[email protected]

Final Check

Sensitivity and risk analysis