1 nyse: gdp. 2 attributes of the oil window of the eagle ford shale adam – houston november 19,...
TRANSCRIPT
3NYSE: GDP
Proved Reserves Growth (Bcfe)
173206
358421402
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
COMPANY PROFILE AND STRATEGY
Reserve Replacement Ratio
1088%
311%
1150%1055%
285%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
■ Rapidly growing onshore E&P company focused in Louisiana and Texas. Repeatable development of multiple objectives with long life reserves and near 100% success rate
■ Rapidly growing production volumes (5 yr CAGR of 34%) and reserves (5 yr CAGR of 24%)
■ Sale of non-core assets for $70 million provides additional liquidity and drives per unit operating costs lower
■ Increasing liquids volumes and cash margin expansion from Eagle Ford Shale oil development
■ Large core acreage position with 220,000 gross (185,000 net) acres in Texas and Louisiana, with approximately 7 Tcf of reserve exposure:
■ 91,000 net acres prospective in the Haynesville Shale
■ 40,000 net acres in the oil window of the Eagle Ford Shale in La Salle and Frio counties Texas
’05 – ’09 CAGR: 25%
Production Growth (Mmcfe/d)
24
43 46
82
66
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
’05 – ’09 CAGR: 36%
4NYSE: GDP
EAGLE FORD SHALE – OIL WINDOW
■ Why the Eagle Ford Shale Oil Window
■ Excellent Rock Properties. Very good porosity (4-15%), matrix permeability (40-1,300 nd) and fracture complexity for a shale play. Allows for storage (source rock) and flow (over-pressured reservoir rock)
■ High presence of carbonate and low presence of clay allows for very effective fracs. Expect variability due to naturally occurring fractures, possible communication with other zones and pressure differences due to depth
■ Large accumulation of oil in place (25-55 MMBoe per 640 ac). Vertical well production indicates matrix flow and hyperbolic curve. Artificial lift a necessity once pressures drop
■ Early innings, but estimated recovery of 300-800 MBoe per well on 80-120 acre spacing based on 4,000 – 6,000 foot laterals
5NYSE: GDP
ACREAGE AND WELL ECONOMICS
• Eagle Ford Shale Acquisition:• Combination of leasehold acquisitions and joint ventures• Total consideration - $1,650/ac ($575/ac in cash and $1,075/ac in future drilling
carries). Average working interest of 72.5% (56% NRI). At 80-120 acre spacing yields 333 – 500 net locations
• Superior Economics:• Driven by oil prices/cash margin expansion• Eagle Ford - IRR of 45% for 6,000 foot lateral on completed well cost of $7.0
million and estimated EUR of 465 MBOE• Buda – IRR of 58% for 6,000 foot lateral on completed well cost of $3.5 million
and estimated EUR of 265 MBOE
7NYSE: GDP
EAGLE FORD SHALE ACTIVITY-2000
-3000
-4000-5000
-6000
-7000
-8000
-9000
-10000
-11000
-12000
-5000
-4000
-6000
-10000
Anadarko 3 wells
Avg. IP: 685 BOE/day
Cabot O & G Patrick West #1HIP: 355 BOE/day
ChesapeakeTraylor North #1HIP: 980 BOE/day
EOG 3 wells
Avg. IP: 525 BOE/day
GDP
Oil Window
Gas/Condensate
Window
Blackbrush Pals Ranch #9H (Buda)
IP: 530 BOE/day
El Paso 3 wells
Avg. IP: 1,050 BOE/day
ChesapeakeLazy A Cotulla #1H
IP: 980 BOE/day
CHK
GDP Pan Am C 1H (EFS)
Completing
HK
APC
EP
EOG
COG
EP
GDP Burns Ranch A 4H (EFS)
Drilling
PetrohawkMustang Ranch #1H
IP: 350 BBL/day
PetrohawkMustang Ranch C #1H
1st 7-day Avg. (on pump): 570 BBL/day
ChesapeakeWilson A #1HCompleting
El PasoTJ Pearsall #1H
Completing
ChesapeakeBrownlow #1H
IP: 1,220 BOE/day
Cabot O & G Arminius Trust #1H
IP: 925 BOE/day
Cabot O & G Arminius Trust #2H
IP: 550 BOE/day
GDP Pan Am B 1H (EFS)
Formerly (Frances Shiner B-1)IP: 667 BOE/day
GDP Lancaster C 1H (Buda)
IP: 512 BOE/day
GDP Burns Ranch A 1H (EFS)
Completing
8NYSE: GDP
Drilling Procedure
• 1,000+ HP rig with top drive• Drill time:
• EFS - 30 days spud-to-spud (approximately 22 days to TD). Targeting 6,000 foot laterals. Spud-to-sales dependent on frac availability (two dedicated frac dates per month) and infrastructure
• Buda – 25 days drill time, 30 days spud-to-spud and spud-to-sales due to no need for stimulation
• Casing program:• Surface casing - 10 ¾” through Carrizo (~ 3,700’)• Intermediate casing – None in quiet geological areas; 7 5/8” into top of EFS or
Buda (~ 7,500’) in highly fractured areas• Production casing - 5 ½”, with 2 3/8” – 2 7/8” tubing for EFS and open hole with
tubing on Buda wells
• Mud program:• EFS – water base (vertical), oil base (lateral) • Buda – water base throughout
9NYSE: GDP
Completion Procedure
• Induce complex networks of fractures with pump-down plug and perf method
• Frac Design: • Intervals of 300-325 feet• Perforations (6 clusters, 5 shots per cluster = 30 perfs per stage) • Fluids (5,500 Bbls per stage - acid, slickwater, gel)• Proppant – 230,000 lbs per stage (100 mesh, 20/40 white, resin
coated/ceramic)• Pump rate (65 bpm, 3-5 stages per day)
• Flowback – 50-100 BPH. Artificial lift (gas lift, pump) at some point early in life of the well
10NYSE: GDP
EAGLE FORD SHALE TYPE CURVE
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55
Production Month
No
rma
lize
d P
rod
uc
tio
n (
BO
E/d
ay
)
Low TC - 400 MBoe Mid TC - 465 MBoe High TC - 535 MBoe
11NYSE: GDP
EAGLE FORD SHALE WELL ECONOMICSEAGLE FORD SHALE WELL ECONOMICS
IRR Sensitivity - $7.0 MM Capex
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
$70.00 / $3.50 $80.00 / $4.00 $90.00 / $4.50Oil Price ($/BBL) / Gas Price ($/MMBtu)
IRR
(%
)
Low TC - 400 Mboe Base TC - 465 Mboe High TC - 535 Mboe
Note: 20:1 Gas to oil price conversion
12NYSE: GDP
BUDA LIME TYPE CURVE
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55
Producing Month
No
rma
lize
d P
rod
ucti
on
(B
oe
/day)
Low TC - 135 MBoe Mid TC - 265 MBoe High TC - 400 MBoe
13NYSE: GDP
BUDA LIME WELL ECONOMICSBUDA LIME WELL ECONOMICS
IRR Sensitivity - $3.5 MM Capex
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
$70.00 / $3.50 $80.00 / $4.00 $90.00 / $4.50Oil Price ($/BBL) / Gas Price ($/MMBtu)
IRR
(%
)
Low TC - 135 Mboe Base TC - 265 Mboe High TC - 400 Mboe
Note: 20:1 Gas to oil price conversion
14NYSE: GDP
DRILLING INVENTORY
AreaGross # of Wells
Net # of Wells
2010 Net Unrisked
Capital Expenditures
(MM)
MY10Proved
Reserves (Bcfe)
Gross Probable
and Possible Wells (2)
Net Probable
and Possible Wells (2)
Net Probable / Possible Reserve
Exposure (Bcfe) (1) (3)
Net Proved, Probable, Possible Reserve Exposure (Bcfe) (1) (3)
Louisiana:Bethany Longstreet – CV Vertical Haynesville Shale (3)
0.0026.00
0.08.0
$0.0$64.0
8177
0290
0135
0614
8791
Greenwood–Waskom / Metcalf / Johnson Branch Haynesville Shale (3) 9.0 4.0 $32.0 26 57 39 177 203
Longwood Haynesville Shale (3)
0.00.0
0.00.0
$0.0$0.0
01
0134
061
0206
0207
Texas:Beckville – CV Vertical Cotton Valley (Horizontal) Haynesville Shale (3)
0.01.01.0
0.01.01.0
$0.0$6.5$8.0
23105
8
058
163
051137
0212462
23317470
Minden – CV Vertical Cotton Valley (Horizontal) Haynesville Shale (3)
0.01.01.0
0.01.01.0
$0.0$6.5$8.0
33179
099
394
086320
0362
1,109
33379
1,118
South Henderson – CV Vertical Cotton Valley (Horizontal)
0.02.0
0.02.0
$0.0$13.0
100
066
054
0222
10222
Angelina River Trend / Shelby Trough Travis Peak / James Lime Haynesville Shale / Bossier (3)
0.04.0
0.04.0
$0.0$44.0
270
120412
44350
882,320
1152,320
Leasehold, Other 0.0 0.0 $33.0 9 0 0 0 9
Total (Shallow Objectives, Other) 4.0 4.0 $26.0 231 343 235 884 1,115
Eagle Ford Shale Trend 7.0 6.5 $35.0 1 458 333 729 730
Haynesville Shale / Bossier (3) 41.0 18.0 $156.0 220 1,450 1,042 4,888 5,108
Total 52.0 29.0 $250.0 451 2,251 1,610 6,501 6,953
(1) Internal estimate.(2) Total Inventory based on the following: 160-acre spacing on horizontal Cotton Valley (Taylor) wells at Beckville, South Henderson and 50% of Minden. James Lime horizontals at Angelina River Trend at 160-acre spacing
on Cotton Prospect acreage only, and horizontal Haynesville Shale spacing at 80 acres.(3) Haynesville Shale reserves estimated at 6.5 Bcf per well at Bethany-Longstreet, Greenwood-Waskom and Metcalf. Shelby Trough and Angelina River Trend estimated at 8.5 Bcf. Reserves of 4.5 Bcf at Longwood,
Beckville, and Minden. No estimated reserves for Bossier Shale or Buda Lime included.
2010 Capital Program2010 Capital Program Total InventoryTotal Inventory
15NYSE: GDP
POTENTIAL IMPACT OF EAGLE FORD SHALE TO GOODRICH PETROLEUM
• Liquids rich resource play allows for cash margin expansion and superior rates of return
• Oil play provides great flexibility in allocation of capital based on commodity price realizations and forecasts
• Huge resource potential for the acreage increases GDP inventory and unrisked net asset value by 10%, and by a much greater percent when factoring in the improved economics due to current premium in oil prices versus gas
• Continue to acquire acreage in our core areas primarily through JV structure (cash and carried interest)