1 new developments affecting employee benefit plans the north florida chapter of the association of...

46
1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

Upload: jose-oconnell

Post on 26-Mar-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

1

New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans

The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel

February 23, 2010

Page 2: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

2

New Developments in EB

• Health Care Reform• COBRA Subsidy Extension• Cafeteria Plan Update• Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act • Third-party Service Agreements• Correction Program under 409A• Qualified Performance Based Compensation under 162(m)• New Defined Benefit Plan regulations

Page 3: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

3

Health Care Reform

1. Employer Mandate2. Individual Mandate 3. Insurance Exchange4. Plan Design5. Financing6. Timelines7. President’s Health Care Reconciliation Bill8. Republican Proposals

Page 4: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

4

Employer Mandated Health Insurance

• Pay or play– Large employers must offer individual and family, or if participant

declines must make contribution to the exchange.

– House Bill - excise tax penalty equal to 8% of wages, plus possible $100 per day per employee.

– Senate Bill - ($750) for full time employees.

– Employer contributions of 72.5% of premium cost for single and 65% for those electing family coverage

– Notice requirements

Page 5: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

5

Individual Mandate – Obtain Health Insurance

• Most individuals are required to maintain acceptable coverage under a health plan– Those exempted include nonresident aliens, individuals

who live and work outside US, qualified religious exemptions, those not lawfully in the US.

– Penalty tax for those who don’t get coverage

Page 6: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

6

Insurance Exchange• House and Senate Bills

– Creates health care exchanges (think Lending Tree, but with health Insurance)

– Plans must meet basic affordability and benefit requirements– Four levels of overages 70%, 85% and 95% and premium plus– Imposes 5k-10k limits on cost sharing– Companies would contribute to premium costs– CBO Estimates that 30-40 million would go to exchange– Creates public plan that would negotiate rates with providers and

would be offered through the exchange– No public option in the Senate Bill

Page 7: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

7

Employer Plan Design Requirements• Auto enrollment for individual coverage at lowest

premium• No lifetime dollar limits for essential benefits• No annual benefit limit maximums• Limits situations where insurer or plan may rescind (self

insured plans) are exempt• Health plans must provide certain preventative health care

services• A $600 fee imposed on large employers that require

waiting periods of more than 60 days

Page 8: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

8

Employer Plan Design cont.

• Incorporate ERISA appeals process but could add additional outside de novo review

• Pre-existing condition and exclusion periods are reduced or eliminated

• New premium rating rules (premiums may vary based only on age (by no more than 2:1 ratio)

• May not rate based on health factors• Tobacco use (by no more than 1.5:1)

Page 9: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

9

Employer Plan Design cont.

• Under the house bill may not reduce retiree benefits unless reduction is also made to active employees.

• Reinsurance for early retirees• Must notify plan enrollees of any increase or decrease in

coverage or cost sharing at least 90 days before the effective date of such change

• New disclosure standards• Must provide certain information to the IRS to show

compliance with essential benefit requirements and persons covered

Page 10: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

10

Financing• House bill

– 5.4% tax on MAGI over 500k for single filers– Self Insured plans must pay a “fair share per capita” amount– Reduce or eliminate Medicare Part D subsidy deduction– Reduce waste fraud and abuse

• Senate bill– .9% tax on wages over 200k for single filers– Yearly fee of $1-$2 x number of lives insured under self insured

plans– Reduce or eliminate Medicare Part D subsidy deduction– Excise tax on “Cadillac plans”– Reduce waste fraud and abuse

Page 11: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

11

House Bill - Timeline

• Employer responsibility to provide HC – 1/1/13

• Individual responsibility to maintain HC – 1/1/13

• Employer plan design provisions – generally 1/1/13– No lifetime or aggregate limits, or insurance rescissions 1/1/10

– HSA penalties -1/1/11

– Retiree provisions – 1/1/10

• Fees and taxes – generally 1/1/13

• Eliminate deduction for Medicare part D - 1/1/13

• Insurance exchange 1/1/13

Page 12: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

12

Senate Bill - Timeline• Employer Responsibility to provide HC – 1/1/14• Individual Responsibility to maintain HC – 1/1/13• Employer plan design provisions – generally 1/1/13

– No lifetime or aggregate limits, or insurance rescissions – 6 months after enactment

– FSAs limited to 2.5K – 1/1/10– HSA penalties – 1/1/11– Retiree provisions 1/1/10

• Fees and taxes – generally 1/1/13• Eliminate deduction for Medicare part D - 1/1/11• Insurance exchange 1/1/14

Page 13: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

13

President’s Proposal

• Issued a summary proposal on 2/22/10• Not big on details• Very similar to the Senate bill• Premium tax credits for those close to the federal

poverty line

Page 14: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

14

Republican Proposals/Ideas

• Medical malpractice liability caps• Allowing sales of health insurance across state

lines• Allow small employers to band together to

purchase health insurance

Page 15: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

15

COBRA Subsidy: The Basics

• Part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”)

• Signed February 17, 2009; COBRA provisions were effective immediately

• Affects most employees who become eligible for COBRA due to an involuntary termination on or after September 1, 2008, and originally, before on December 31, 2009

• Second chance at COBRA election (known as the “extended election”) for many already terminated employees

Page 16: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

16

COBRA Subsidy: The Basics

• Government subsidy – equal to 65% of the employee’s COBRA premium;

– for a maximum of 9 months;

– eligible employee ends up paying 35%.

• The employer, insurer, or multiemployer plan “fronts” the subsidy payment and recoups it through a payroll tax credit.

Page 17: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

17

Question

Who is eligible for the subsidy?

Page 18: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

18

Answer• “Assistance Eligible Individuals” (AEIs) are:

– qualified beneficiaries – who actually elect COBRA coverage– who become eligible for COBRA continuation coverage after

September 1, 2008 – as a result of their involuntary termination of employment

during that time frame• Limitations on AEI status:

– A qualified beneficiary who has a qualifying event because of a reduction in hours, divorce, or aging out of dependent status is not an AEI

– Limitations and exclusions for high income AEIs• Special “second chance” rule for AEIs with a termination date

between September 1, 2008 and February 17, 2009 who failed to elect COBRA or who elected COBRA and are no longer enrolled.

Page 19: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

19

Question

What is the “Second Chance” or “Extended Election?”

Page 20: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

20

Answer• AEIs who:

– terminated before February 17, 2009 (but after September 1, 2008) and failed to elect COBRA; or

– terminated before February 17, 2009 (but after September 1, 2008) and elected COBRA but are no longer covered as of February 17, 2009

• Have a second chance to elect COBRA coverage by electing subsidized COBRA coverage.

• Notice must be provided to AEIs by April 18, 2009. Model notices have been provided by the Department of Labor.

• Elections must be made in 60 days following receipt of the notice (retroactive to February 17, 2009); 35% premium payment must be made in 45 days after the date of the election (premium will be retroactive to February 17, 2009).

Page 21: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

21

How Is COBRA Subsidy Claimed?

• After the payor pays the subsidy, it may claim that amount as a credit against payroll taxes owed on Form 941. Payroll taxes include:– Income tax withheld at source

– Employer’s FICA tax

– Active employees’ FICA tax

Page 22: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

22

Department of Defense Appropriations Act

• On December 19, 2009, President Obama signed the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2010 (the DOD Act),

• Extended the COBRA subsidy program class through the end of February 2010 and

• Expanded the COBRA subsidy period to 15 months.

Page 23: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

23

Extension of Eligible Class

• The window for determining eligibility for participation in the program was extended by two months.

• The revised program will apply to individuals who lose their group health plan coverage due to an involuntary termination of employment between January 1, 2010 and February 28, 2010.

• Under ARRA, the deadline was December 31, 2009.

Page 24: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

24

Extension of Subsidy Period

• The DOD Act extended the duration of the subsidy by six months. – All AEIs may participate in the COBRA subsidy

program for a total of 15 months, rather than the previous nine months.

– If an AEI’s nine-month ARRA COBRA subsidy period has lapsed, the new rules are effective retroactively to the date the prior period ended.

– The new rules do not extend the normal 18-month COBRA continuation period.

Page 25: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

25

• AEIs who dropped their COBRA coverage when the ARRA COBRA subsidy expired must be given the opportunity to regain subsidized COBRA coverage by paying COBRA premiums retroactively.

• Employers must now treat these individuals as eligible for the extended period of COBRA coverage if they pay the reduced premium amount for the entire period since the lapse of their COBRA coverage

– by February 17, 2010 or

– , if later, 30 days after they receive proper notice of their new rights under the law.

Page 26: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

26

• AEIs who continued to pay full COBRA premiums for coverage following the lapse of the ARRA subsidy are entitled to reimbursement for their payment of the 65% subsidy.

• Under the DOD Act, employers must either make a reimbursement payment equal to the excess portion paid or credit that amount toward future premiums payable,– provided that it is reasonable to believe that the credit

will be used within 180 days.

Page 27: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

27

Notice• Notice must be given to AEIs who either:

– (i) were eligible for assistance on or after October 31, 2009 or

– (ii) become AEIs due to a voluntary or involuntary termination of employment on or after that date.

• This notice was required– no later than February 17, 2010 or

– within the timeframe mandated under ARRA if the individual becomes eligible for assistance after December 19, 2009.

Page 28: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

28

Notice

• Notice describing the AEI’s right to pay retroactive premiums to reinstate coverage and the right to reimbursement for overpayment– It must be given to individuals within the first 60 days

in their “transition period”.

– This is the period that begins immediately after the end of the nine-month ARRA COBRA subsidy period.

Page 29: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

29

Jobs for Main Street Act of 2010

• The House of Representatives has passed the Jobs for Main Street Act of 2010 (the Jobs Act),

• Would further expand the COBRA subsidy program class through the end of June 2010 if enacted.

• The Jobs Act is expected to be taken up by the Senate in the coming year.

Page 30: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

30

Extension of Eligible Class• The Jobs Act would extend the window for determining

eligibility for participation in the program by an additional four months from the DOD Act deadline (February 28, 2009) to June 30, 2010.

• The Jobs Act would expand the class of employees who are eligible for assistance. Employees who lose group health plan coverage due to a reduction in hours that is followed by an involuntary termination of employment would be considered AEIs if other requirements for eligibility are met.

Page 31: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

31

Retiree Health Plan Coverage

• Under current law, individuals who are eligible for post-employment coverage under certain types of retiree health plans are not eligible for the COBRA subsidy.

• The Jobs Act would clarify that retiree health coverage does not automatically disqualify an individual from eligibility for a COBRA subsidy.

Page 32: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

32

Employer Payroll Tax Liability

• Under current law, employers are at risk for improper payroll withholding when they make an incorrect determination regarding an AEI’s eligibility for the COBRA subsidy.

• The Jobs Act would provide a safe harbor for those employers that – maintain proper documentation,

– attest to the involuntary nature of the termination, and

– base their decisions on a reasonable interpretation of the provisions under ARRA and other related administrative guidance.

Page 33: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

33

Notification

• The Jobs Act would require employers to distribute an additional explanation of the changes created by the legislation.

• Thus, employers would be required to supply one or more notices in addition to those that are currently required.

Page 34: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

34

Penalties for Non-Compliance

• The Jobs Act would expose employers to increased penalties for violations of ARRA provisions.

• The Jobs Act would create a civil penalty of $110 per day where a COBRA subsidy is not provided within 10 days of an agency determination that an individual is entitled to a subsidy.

Page 35: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

35

Cafeteria Plan Update

• Proposed Rules issued in 2007; final regulations out later this spring with effective dates as early as of the end of 2010.– This time there serious– Must have plan document

• Benefit descriptions• Participation rules• Election procedures• Employer contributions

– Must comply in operation

Page 36: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

36

Cafeteria Plan Update

• Nondiscrimination Rules– Greatly expanded nondiscrimination rules for eligibility (as well as

contributions and benefits)

– Borrows some retirement plan concepts

– Objective test to determine whether elected benefits are discriminatory.

– Cafeteria plans will have to show each year that the utilization of benefits by highly compensated participants is not discriminatory

Page 37: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

37

Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act

• New GINA Rules became effective 12/31/09

• Prohibits GHPs and health insurers from denying coverage to a healthy individual or charging that person higher premiums on due genetics

• Bars employers from using individuals' genetic information when making hiring, firing, job placement, or promotion decisions.

Page 38: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

38

Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act

• Wellness plans cant provide rewards for providing genetic information (eg. Family history info):– Premium discounts, changes in deductibles, rebates and

other information

– Self reporting violations with excise tax

– What to do if you probably collected the info prior to GINA effective date

Page 39: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

39

Third-Party Service Agreements

“The Employer shall fully indemnify TPS and hold it harmless from loss or liability, including reasonable legal fees and costs, which TPS sustains in discharging its duties and responsibilities under this Agreement, unless such loss or liability directly results from TPS’s gross negligence or willful misconduct. Notwithstanding, the foregoing TPS shall in all events be indemnified by the Employer from loss or liability for all amounts in excess of the lesser of (i) amount of annual fees charged by TPS under this agreement or (ii) $50,000.”

Page 40: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

40

Third-Party Service Provider Agreements

• Is it enforceable?• Is it prudent to enter into such an Agreement with a

liability limitation or indemnification provision?• Is it reasonable?

– “Gross negligence, willful misconduct”– Limits on liability equal to fees or a cap– Limits time to discover mistakes to 60 days after providing

information such as trust or participant statements– Take indemnified amounts from the plan

Page 41: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

41

409A Document Correction

• General principles similar to qualified plan correction program

• Types of errors eligible– Impermissible payment events; separation from service, change in

control, disability– Impermissible payment period following a permissible payment

event; longer than 90 days; executing a release – Choice between permissible payment events– Discretion to accelerate payment events– Not including six month delay

Page 42: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

42

409A Document Correction

• Transition Relief for those corrected by 12/31/10• After 12/31/10, correction may require

participants include a certain amount in income (50%-20%); and pay the excise tax on such amounts

• Stock plans are not eligible.

Page 43: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

43

162(m) Deductibility

• $1 million deductibility cap for amounts paid by public companies to CEO and three highest paid, unless qualified performance based compensation

• Prior Rev. Rul. 2008-13, accelerated vesting and payout of bonus and equity upon involuntary termination and retirement were deductible.

• Rev. Rul 2008-13 clarifies these positions.

Page 44: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

44

Defined Benefit Plan Regulations

• PPA added new Code Section 430 (funding rules) and 436 (limitation on the accrual and payment of benefits for underfunded plans)

• Under 436, cannot pay benefits – upon plant shutdown if funding level below 60%– cannot be amended to increase benefits, establish new benefits, increase

the rate of accrual or accelerate the vesting schedule if less than 80%– Cannot pay lump sum distributions if funding level more than 60% but

less than 80%, or if bankrupt– If below 60% funded the plan is automatically frozen

Page 45: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

45

Defined Benefit Plan Regulations

• Plans must be amended for these requirements• These must be communicated to participants• Any amendment that is otherwise ineffective will become effective

once the plan meets the applicable funding requirements• Participants who were not otherwise given the opportunity to receive a

lump sum distribution due to a funding limitation may elect a lump sum distribution after funding requirements are met

• Allow plans to change interest rates for determining funding levels

Page 46: 1 New Developments Affecting Employee Benefit Plans The North Florida Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel February 23, 2010

46

THE ENDBusiness Department

Capital Markets | Energy & Utilities | Health Care | International | Land Use & EnvironmentalMergers & Acquisitions, Securities & Corporate Services | Real Estate Transactions | Tax & Employee Benefits | Technology & Business

Litigation DepartmentAntitrust & Trade Regulation | Business & Securities Litigation | Complex Commercial Litigation | Financial Services Litigation | Government

Investigations IP Litigation/Patents | Labor & Employment | Product & Consumer Litigation | Restructuring & Insolvency | Toxic Torts & Environmental

Litigation

ATLANTA • BALTIMORE • CHARLOTTE • CHARLOTTESVILLE • CHICAGO • JACKSONVILLE • LOS ANGELESNEW YORK • NORFOLK • PITTSBURGH • RALEIGH • RICHMOND • TYSONS CORNER • WASHINGTON, D.C. • WILMINGTON

ALMATY, KAZAKHSTAN | BRUSSELS, BELGIUM | LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM

www.mcguirewoods.com

2009 McGuireWoods LLP