1 missouri school improvement program (msip) fourth cycle becky kemna, coordinator school...

1

Missouri Missouri School Improvement Program (MSIP)School Improvement Program (MSIP)

Fourth CycleFourth Cycle

Becky Kemna, CoordinatorSchool Improvement and Accreditation

[email protected](573) 751-4426

http://dese.mo.gov/divimprove/sia/msip/index.html

mailto:[email protected]



2

MSIPMSIPThe Missouri School Improvement Program…

Missouri’s system of accountability

– review and classify the 524 school districts in Missouri within a five-year review cycle (since 1990)

– mandated by state law

– goal to promote school improvement within each district on a statewide basis

– districts failing to earn accreditation face lapse or state takeover

– July 1 begins first year of the 4th MSIP Cycle

3

Standards and Standards and IndicatorsIndicators

• Outline the vision and expectations for quality schools.

• Organized into three sections:– Performance Standards (Student

achievement) – Resource Standards (Pupil teacher ratios,

course offerings, teacher qualifications)– Process Standards (compliance,

instructional design and practices, school climate, differentiated instruction)

4

Third CycleThird Cycle

• Annual Performance Report generated annually to evaluate performance standards

• Resource Report generated annually

• Process evaluated on-site by review team

• Number of points earned in Performance, Resource, and Process determine accreditation

5

What we’ve learned…What we’ve learned…• APR does not accurately reflect improvement needs of all

524 districts• APR scores are too volatile, leading to inconsistent

accreditation decisions • Reviews need to focus less on compliance and more on

quality in order to facilitate true improvement in student performance

• Reviews should focus on improvement needs in districts as determined by available data at the school, subject, and grade level

• District level accreditation does not always reflect individual building status –leads to conflicts in accountability systems

• Resource and Process do not impact accreditation

6

Performance… “For an accountability system to be fair it has to be complicated.”

• Determines accreditation• Status and Progress measures lead to

• More stability in APR calls• More appropriate “recognition”• Credit when achievement is adequate

• APR • Provides more detailed, disaggregated data and

evaluative, narrative feedback• Identifies areas in need of improvement• Used as a true “school improvement planning

tool”• Determines waiver eligibility (Limited Waiver or

Full Waiver)

Where we’re going …Where we’re going …

8

2006 DISTRICT SUMMARY OF ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT (APR) DATECounty/District Code: «DISTCODE» District Name: «DISTNAME»

MSIPStandard/Indicator

GRADE SPAN GRADE LEVEL Total Points Earned PointsReq

Met/Not MetStatus

PointsProgress Points

Status Points

Progress Points**

Grade Span Grade Level

Status Progress Status Progress*

9.1*1 MAP Grades 3-5Mathematics

High 1=High 2=Avg=Blw Avg=Floor=

Annual=Rlng Avg=3 Over 2=


40 Status or

50 Status +

ProgressTOTAL=

9.1*2 MAP Grades 3-5Communication Arts




40 Status or

50 Status +

ProgressTOTAL=





40 Status or

50 Status +

ProgressTOTAL=

9.1*4 MAP Grades 6-8Communication Arts




40 Status or

50 Status +

ProgressTOTAL=





40 Status or

50 Status +

ProgressTOTAL=

**No progress points may be earned for grade level test data in Year 1 of the Fourth MSIP Cycle.

9

MSIPStandard/

Indicator

StatusPoints

ProgressPoints

Total Points Earned Points Required (Minimum) Met/Not MetStatus Status +

ProgressStatus Status + Progress

9.3 ACT High 1=High 2=Avg=Blw Avg=Floor=


4 4

9.4*1 Advanced Courses


Annual=Rlng Avg=3 Over 2=Combined=

4 4

9.4*2 Career Education Courses



4 4

9.4*3 College Placement



4 4

9.4*4 Career Education Placement



4 4

9.5 Graduation Rate



4 4

9.6 Attendance Rate



4 4

10

G R A D E

S P A N

G R A D E

L E V E L

Performance Status and Progress Measures – SAMPLE YEAR 1, 2006

9.1*1 MAP GRADE SPAN 3-5 Mathematics

STATUS PROGRESS

Status Measures

MPI Score (5-Yr Avg)

StatusPointsEarned

Progress Measures

Progress Points Earned

Progress Points

Possible

Progress Measure Description

High 1 220.4-300 50 Annual 10 per increase

40 10 points for each annual MAP Performance Index (MPI) increase of 2 points.

High 2 210.4-220.3

40 Rolling Average

10 per increase

30 10 points for each rolling average increase of 2 MPI points.

Average 200.5-210.3

30 3 Over 2 20 20 20 points for an increase of 6 MPI points (latest three years averaged compared with the first two years averaged).

Below Average

190.5-200.4

20 Level Not Determined (LND): Zero (0) points will be awarded for grade span data when the LND is exceeded.

Floor 100-190.4 0

9.1*1 MAP GRADE LEVEL 3-5 Mathematics

STATUS PROGRESS

Status Measures


StatusPointsEarned

Progress Measures


Progress Points

Possible


High 1 NYA NYA Annual

High 2 NYA NYA Rolling Average

Average NYA NYA 3 Over 2

Below Average

NYA NYA Level Not Determined (LND): Zero (0) points will be awarded for grade level data when the LND is exceeded.

Floor NYA NYA

NYA=Not Yet Available Grade level status and progress details will be determined after Grade Level test results are available.

11

9.3 ACT

STATUS PROGRESS

Status Measures

% (5-Yr Avg)

StatusPointsEarned

Progress Measures


Progress Points

Possible


High 1 39.1-100% 5 Annual 1 per increase

4 1 point for each 1% annual increase.

High 2 32.8-39.0% 4 Rolling Average

1 per increase

3 1 point for each rolling average increase of 1%.

Average 26.6-32.7% 3 3 Over 2 2 2 2 points for an increase of 2% (latest three years averaged compared with the first two years averaged).

Below Average

20.3-26.5% 2 Status: % of graduates scoring at or above the national average on the ACT.

Floor 0-20.2% 0

9.4*1 Advanced Courses

STATUS PROGRESS

Status Measures

% 5-Yr Avg)

StatusPointsEarned

Progress Measures


Progress Points

Possible


High 1 48.9-100% 5 Annual 1 per increase

4 1 point for each 2% annual increase.

High 2 43.5-48.8% 4 Rolling Average

1 per increase

3 1 point for each rolling average increase of 2%.

Average 38.0-43.4% 3 3 Over 2 2 2 2 points for an increase of 5% (latest three years averaged compared with the first two years averaged).

Below Average

32.5-37.9% 2 Combined: If the % of students enrolled in advanced and career education courses combined (Standards 9.4*1 and 9.4*2) are at or above the required Combined percentage, both standards are considered met.

Floor 0-32.4% 0

Combined 64.8-100% 4

12

3-5 MATHEMATICS 3-5 MATHEMATICS

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 GRADE 2006

195.2 198.3 199.4 202.1 204.5 3 200.2

4 202.3

5 204.5

TOTAL 202.33

Status MPI Score (5-Yr Avg)

District Score

Status Points Earned

Progress Measures


District Progress

Progress Points

Possible


Status Points Earned

High 1 220.4 + 50 Annual 10 per increase

30 40

High 2 210.4-220.3

40 Rolling Average

10 per increase

20 30

Average 200.5-210.3

30 3 Over 2 20 0 20 ??? ??5??

Floor 0-190.4 0 Floor

20 30 5

REQUIRED TO MEET

TOTAL Progress + StatusREQUIRED TO MEET 50

9.1*1 MAP GRADE SPAN 3-5 MATHEMATICS

GRADE SPAN DATA GRADE LEVEL DATASTATUS PROGRESS

GR

AD

E L

EV

EL

TE

ST

S

GR

AD

E S

PA

N T

ES

TS

Below Average

190.5-200.4

199.9 20

Average

High 2

High 1

Status District Score

202.3

25

55

Below Average

40

TOTAL Status

STATUS

SUBTOTALS + +

LND > 5%? LND > 5%?

Level Not Determined (LND): Zero (0) points will be awarded for grade span data when the LND is exceeded.

13

• Single-system of accountability reduces conflicts in accountability systems

• Resources allocated to provide assistance to schools that need it most

• School improvement efforts will be better coordinated to provide ongoing support

• Customized reviews will minimize paperwork/documentation necessary for on-site review

• Performance – Is more stable– Identifies areas in need of improvement – Allows districts to establish goals for improvement– More accurately reflects overall performance of

district

Summary

14

School Improvement and Accreditation

http://www.dese.mo.gov

(573) 751-4426

Questions/CommentsQuestions/CommentsQuestions/CommentsQuestions/Comments

http://www.dese.mo.gov/

1 missouri school improvement program (msip) fourth cycle becky kemna, coordinator school...

Documents