1 labor market. 2 deindustrialization? manufacturing wage rate, 2005 united states

43
1 Labor Market

Upload: clarence-dennis

Post on 05-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

1

Labor Market

Page 2: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

2

Deindustrialization?

Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005

United States

Page 3: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

3

Wages by Education in the U.S.

15 percent of U.S. population do not have a high school degree

73 percent of U.S. population do not have a college degree

Page 4: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

4

Merchandise exports as % of GDP

In 2007 World Exports was 31% of World GDP

Page 5: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

5

Exports from Around the World

Exports from Developing Countries is now about half of world exports.

Exports from China have seen explosive growth (larger than

Japan).

Page 6: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

6

What DeterminesWages and Employment?

Page 7: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

7

Diminishing Marginal Productivity of Labor

3.0

7.0

n

kAMPN

n

Fix A, kMPN

• MPN depends on A and k/n

• For given k and A, a rise in n leads to a fall in MPN

Page 8: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

8

Short-Run Labor Demand

• w = real wage rate

• To maximize profits the firm should– Increase n if MPN > w*– Decrease n if MPN < w*

• It follows that the demand for labor function equals the MPN function

MPN=Nd

MPN & w

n

W*

MPN1

MPN2

n1 n2n*

w = MPNCondition of profit maximization

Page 9: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

9

Factors that Shift the Aggregate Labor Demand Curve

• An increase in TFP causes the labor demand curve to shift right.

• An increase in the capital stock causes the labor demand curve to shift right.

w

n

Increase in A or k

Page 10: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

10

Does the theory work?

• Are real wages proportional to labor productivity over time?

• Are real wages proportional to labor productivity across countries?

w = MPN

Page 11: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

11

Real Wages and Productivity over time for the U.S.

Page 12: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

12

Real Wages and Productivity Across Countries

Wages and Productivity(Output per Worker) Across Countries

Page 13: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

13

International Wage Differences

Page 14: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

14

Productivity and Wages

Page 15: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

15

Do real wages converge?

Page 16: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

16

The Supply of Labor

• Labor is supplied by households

• Aggregate labor supply increases with wages

• Higher wealth lowers labor supply at any wage

w

n

nsSupply curve is drawn for a fixed level of wealth

Page 17: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

17

Short-Run Labor Market Equilibrium(fix k)

• Real wage is determined so that labor demand equals labor supply at point X.

• An increase in TFP shifts the MPN curve to MPN*.

• The new equilibrium is at point Z with higher real wage and employment.

MPN*

MPN

w

n

X

Z

Page 18: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

18

Recession

Sharp oil price rise• Lowers A• Lowers demand for

labor• Lowers real wages and

real GDP

• This is a recession.

w

n

MPN*

MPN

ns

This theory implies that supply shocks drive the business cycle.

Page 19: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

19

Price of Oil and RecessionsPrice of West Texas Intermediate Crude

Shaded Regions are Periods of Recession

Page 20: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

20

Price of Oil and the 2008/09 Recession

Source: James Hamilton, 2009, “Causes and Consequences of the Oil Shock of 2007-08,” NBER Working Paper.

Page 21: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

21

Jobless RecoveriesFor the 1990/91 and 2001 recessions, unemployment remained high for 18 months after GDP recovered. How about 2008/09?

Shaded Regions are Periods of Recession

Page 22: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

22

The Great Moderation?Recessions seem to be milder as of the early 1980s.

Shaded Regions are Periods of Recession

Page 23: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

23

European Unemployment

Page 24: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

24

Labor Market Dynamicsand Structural Transformation

Page 25: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

25

Size Distribution of Firms in the US

Over half of all employment is in small firms.Source: Brian Headd, “The Characteristics of Small-Business Employees,” Monthly Labor Review, 2000.

Page 26: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

26

Job Creation and Destruction in the US

Job creation and destruction is significantly higher than net job creation.

Job creation: net employment change of establishments expanding employment

Job destruction: net employment change of establishments reducing employment

2006Q2• 7.8 million jobs created

• 7.3 million jobs destroyed

• 0.5 million net change in number of jobs

Page 27: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

27

Productivity and Resource Reallocation

Churning is the key to economic growth.

Source: John Haltiwanger, “New Ideas for Measuring Labor Productivity,” Census Brief, 1998.

Page 28: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

28

Structural Transformation and Development

Source: Bah El-hadj, The University of Auckland, “Structural Transformation in Developed and Developing Countries,” 2008.

Page 29: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

29

Farm and Non-farm Productivity in the U.S.

Page 30: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

30

Urbanization and Development

Source: World Development Report 2009.

Page 31: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

31

Urbanization and Development

2009

46

82

Page 32: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

32

Real Wages and Hours Worked

Page 33: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

33

Labor Market and Wealth

• A permanent rise in A raises MPN and thus shifts out the labor demand curve.

• A permanent rise in A raises wealth and thus shifts left the labor supply curve.

• The new equilibrium is at point Z with higher real wage and possibly lower employment.

• Note, though, that hours worked per person may fall, but a rise in wages may lead to a rise in the labor force participation rate (especially for relatively poor countries).

MPN*

MPN

w

n

X

Z

ns

*ns

Page 34: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

34

Aggregate Labor Supply and Wealth

Aggregate Labor Supply

Permanent w

Period of rising labor force participation rate and hours worked

Reduction in hours worked

Page 35: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

35

Income Inequality

Page 36: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

36

Rise in Real Wage Dispersion

• Two potential explanations– Open trade (greater globalization)– Technological improvements

Page 37: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

37

Skill Biased Technical Change

w

N_unskilled

ND_unskilled

ND’_unskilled

NS_unskilled

N_skilled

w

ND_skilled

ND’_skilled

NS_skilled

•Skill biased technical change increases demand for skilled workers and hence their wages

•The opposite is true for unskilled workers.

Page 38: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

38

Page 39: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

39

Key Message

• Wage premium for skills have gone up and relative supply have been catching up

• The information technology (IT) revolution is biased toward skilled labor

Page 40: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

40

Source: Bils and Klenow, “Does School Cause Growth“, American Economic Review, 2000

Skill Premia Across Countries

Skill premia are highest for poor countries.

Page 41: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

41

Income Inequality in the U.S.

Source: Emmanuel Saez, “Striking it Richer: The Evolution of Top Incomes in the United States", 2009

Technology and education as drivers of income inequality

Page 42: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

42

Income Inequality by Country

Source: CIA Factbook Gini Coef. = A/(A+B)

Range from 0 to 1 (100)

0 = complete equality

Page 43: 1 Labor Market. 2 Deindustrialization? Manufacturing Wage Rate, 2005 United States

43

Income Inequality by Region Over Time

Is world growth driven by technology or education?