1 introduction - imperial college london · web view2011/07/16 · furthermore, no intermetallic...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 1 Introduction - Imperial College London · Web view2011/07/16 · Furthermore, no intermetallic compounds were observed in the joint, which have been commonly observed in the brazed](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022071406/60fc0ffb8da7f978bf423eba/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The development of high strength brazing technique for Ti-6Al-4V using TiZrCuNi amorphous filler
Yongjuan Jinga*, DiyaoSua, XishanYuea, T.B. Brittonb, Jun Jiangc
a, Aeronautical Key Laboratory for Welding and Joining Technology, Beijing 100024, PR China
b, Department of Materials, Imperial College London,ExhibitionRoad,London, SW7 2AZ, UK
c, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London,ExhibitionRoad,London, SW7 2AZ, UK
Abstract: The brazing joint of the Ti-6Al-4V alloy was produced with a designed brazing
filler alloy and the optimized brazing temperature which is lower than the β-phase
transformation of the matrix. The strength and the ductility of brazing joined Ti-6Al-4V
samples were evaluated by conventional tensile tests with a DIC 2D-strain field
measurement. The Widmanstätten microstructure with no voids or cracks or intermetallic
compounds was found throughout the joint with a width of β-lamellar as ~1µm. Due to the
fine acicular α-Widmanstätten and β-lamellar, and the uniformly diffused filler elements
throughout the entire joint, the strength of the joint was as much as the matrix. In addition,
the hardness test results agreed well with the tensile strength tests. All fractures occurred in
the matrix rather than the brazing joints. Furthermore, the maximum local tensile strain was
measured as 20% in the matrix, while under the same stress, the brazing joint only reached
6.3% tensile plastic strain. Thus, the mechanical properties of the joint with the associated
microstructure demonstrated that a successful brazing filler alloy has been developed for the
Ti-6Al-4V alloy.
Keywords: brazing; joint strength; microstructure; Ti-6Al-4V alloy
1 Introduction
Ti-6Al-4V alloys have increasing importance due to structural demands for aerospace
and medical applications, as seen in the review[1]. In the joining of Titanium alloys, brazing
technology has been recognized as a promising joining approach. Until now, over 100
brazing filler metals (BFMs) have been developed and tested to meet industrial needs,
especially the joint strength. The most common BFMs are Ti-based BFMs [2].
It is noted that the joint strength was sensitive to the intermetallic, which was easily
formed in the joint due to the high chemical activity of the Ti element. The investigation by
*E-mail adress:[email protected]
![Page 2: 1 Introduction - Imperial College London · Web view2011/07/16 · Furthermore, no intermetallic compounds were observed in the joint, which have been commonly observed in the brazed](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022071406/60fc0ffb8da7f978bf423eba/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Shiueet al.[3]showed that the presence of both Ti2Ni and interfacial Ti3Al phases in the joint
deteriorates the shear strength of the joint. In addition, the amount of Ti2Ni could be
decreased by increasing the brazing temperature and/or time due to the diffusion of Ni from
the BFMs (Ti-15Cu-25Ni and Ti-15Cu-15Ni) into the Ti-6Al-4V matrix during brazing. This
phenomenon was testified [4,5]with the other kind of Ti-based BFMs. Therefore, optimizing
the brazing process was one of the ways to solve this problem.
Even though the Ti-6Al-4V brazed joint strength can catch up to? the base metal by
optimizing the brazing process, as reported by Ganjehaet al.[6], the maintenance of the
mechanical properties for the matrix cannot be ignored. With reference to Leyenset al.[7] , the
β-transus temperature (Tβ) of Ti-6Al-4V was 1268 K, and it was suggested that for joining α
+ β titanium alloys, the brazing temperature should usually be about 38-66 K below the T β in
order to avoid the mechanical property impairment of the base materials caused by the phase
transformation and grain coarsening.
Moreover, the ductility of the joints is also one of the key mechanical properties related
to the structure integrity of joined parts, which has not been reported until now. Due to the
thin brazing joint (~400µm in width [8,9]), the Digital Image Correlation (DIC) technique
might be a suitable method to test the local strain of the brazing samples instead of the
conventional strain measurement methods such as strain gauges.
Earlier work by Jing et al.[10]has made some progress in balancing the interface
microstructure and maintaining the mechanical properties of the matrix by the composition
design on Ti-based BFMs for the Ti-6Al-4V honeycomb structure. With the earlier designed
Ti-18Zr-15Cu-10Ni wt.% BFMs, the current investigation aims to establish the relationship
between the developed microstructure of the joint and its associated mechanical properties for
Ti-6Al-4V.
2 Experimental processA braze joined Ti-6Al-4V alloy plate of 100mm thickness was used as the base material.
All tested specimens (ASTM E8, 2013) were cut from it as shown in Fig.1. The brazing filler
composition and processing procedure are listed in Table 1. Vacuum brazing was performed
in a vacuum of 5×10−5 mbar. The melting behaviors of the filler foil were examined by a
differential thermal analyzer (DTA, Shimadzu DTG-60H) from room temperature up to 960 ℃ at a heating rate of 20℃/min. The designed filler was measured to have a narrow melting
temperature range of 840-860 ℃, which is suitable for brazing.
2
![Page 3: 1 Introduction - Imperial College London · Web view2011/07/16 · Furthermore, no intermetallic compounds were observed in the joint, which have been commonly observed in the brazed](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022071406/60fc0ffb8da7f978bf423eba/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Composition/wt.% Melting point/℃ Brazing process
Ti-18Zr-15Cu-10Ni 840-860 930℃/3600s
Table 1 Chemical composition of the filler metal and the brazing process
Fig.1 schematically showing the processes of sample
Mechanical tests including a tensile test and micro-hardness at room temperature were
carried out to evaluate the mechanical properties of the joint. The tensile tests were carried
out using a MTS tensile tester (MTS-810, U.S.A.) at a constant speed of 0.1 mm/min.
DIC is an optical 2D-strain field analysis method by tracing the movement of regions of
interest, which consists of random black and white patterns by spraying ~3µm sized printer
toner particles on the free surface. It enables the evaluation of the strain field across the
brazing line. High resolution digital images (2016x2016 pixels) for the DIC strain
measurement were captured using a Nikon D5500 camera. Thus, DIC could be used to study
the local strain fields on brazing joined samples.
Standard metallographic preparations of grinding and polishing were conducted. The
samples were finally etched by Kroll’s reagent (3 ml HF + 6 ml HNO 3 + 100 mlH2O) to
reveal microstructures in SEM (JEOL JXA 8200). The composite analysis and element
distribution were evaluated by using energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX).
Furthermore, local crystal orientations and phase distribution near the joint were revealed by
the electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) technique.
3 Results
3.1 Tensile strength of brazed samples
For joining α + β Titanium alloys, such as Ti-6Al-4V with a β-transus temperature (Tβ)
of 1268 K (995°C), the brazing temperature should usually be about 38-66 K (responding to
929-957°C), the brazing temperature should be lower than the Tβ in order to avoid the
mechanical property impairment of the base materials caused by the phase transformation and
3
![Page 4: 1 Introduction - Imperial College London · Web view2011/07/16 · Furthermore, no intermetallic compounds were observed in the joint, which have been commonly observed in the brazed](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022071406/60fc0ffb8da7f978bf423eba/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
grain coarsening. In this study, the brazing temperature was 930 ℃.
The tensile property of the Ti-6Al-4V matrix before brazing was shown in Fig.2. The
results show variations in the ultimate tensile strength from 900 to 990 MPa with 943 MPa on
average, and the tensile elongation was from 12 to 19 %. The scattering of tensile properties
is likely due to the presence of texture e.g. the strong anisotropic plasticity of Ti alloys. The
micro-texture has been discovered in Ti-6Al-4V alloy for industry application. After brazing,
the average tensile strength and the tensile elongation of the matrix was 920 MPa and 13 %.
Moreover, there was no obvious course of the duplex microstructure in the matrix.
Fig.2 The tensile stress-strain curve of the matrix at room temperature
The ultimate tensile strength values of three brazed samples of Ti-6Al-4V were 940MPa,
888 MPa and 889MPa respectively with 905MPa on average, [which is comparably strong
compared to the matrix. All fractures occurred in the matrix. The variation of the tested
results might be due to the variation of the strength in the matrix.
The ductility of the brazed joint is measured by the DIC technique. The strain map of the
gauge region of the brazed sample at 880MPa is shown in Fig3. The strain evolution of the
other two samples was the same as this one. The development of strain in the gauge region
through the tensile test was captured as a function of time, as seen in Fig.3(a).Repetition of
reference to fig3 The entire strain development can be divided into 4 stages.
At the beginning, the strain in the samples is relatively uniform (in light blue color, stage
I of Fig.3(a)). The joint endured the same strain as the matrix, as shown in Fig.3(b)-I and it
was almost 0.6%. Therefore, stage I is the elastic process. With an increase of tensile stress, a
higher strain appeared at the top half of the region (strain range as 5-10%, Fig.3(b)-II and III).
It was obvious that the accumulated strain at the joint is much lower than that of the matrix.
4
![Page 5: 1 Introduction - Imperial College London · Web view2011/07/16 · Furthermore, no intermetallic compounds were observed in the joint, which have been commonly observed in the brazed](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022071406/60fc0ffb8da7f978bf423eba/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Thus, the plastic deformation occurred at stage II. A large plastic deformation occurred in the
upper half matrix of the sample. The site of strain localization (necking) is at the middle of
the upper half sample, which is away from the joint (in red color, stage IV), which
corresponded to the fracture location as shown in Fig.3d. The sample fractured at the necking
site with a nominal local strain of 20%, which was measured just before the occurrence of the
fracture (Fig.3(b)-IV). The local strain at the joints was found to be lower than that of the
samples. The maximum of the local strain of the joint was 6.3%, as shown in Fig.3c.
In addition, micro-hardness tests were conducted to check and compare the properties
between the joint and matrix. The results are illustrated in Fig.4. An excellent agreement was
reached compared with the tensile strength tests. It was found that after brazing, the average
hardness of the brazing joint (326HV) is higher than the matrix (301HV). The hardness
variation along the brazing line is small. These results confirm that the strength of the brazing
joints is considerably higher than the matrix.
(a)
(b)
5
![Page 6: 1 Introduction - Imperial College London · Web view2011/07/16 · Furthermore, no intermetallic compounds were observed in the joint, which have been commonly observed in the brazed](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022071406/60fc0ffb8da7f978bf423eba/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
(c) (d)
Fig.3 Ductility of brazing joined Ti-6Al-4V samples at room temperature
(a) Strain map of the brazed sample during tensile test; (b) the I, II, III and IV stages of
the strain evolution; (c) strain evolution of the brazed joint during tensile; (d) fracture of the
brazing samples;
Fig.4 the micro hardness of the brazing joined Ti-6Al-4V samples
3.2 Interface microstructure
The brazing joint was successfully formed in the examined samples as shown in an
enlarged brazing area in Fig.5a and b. With the developed brazing process, the Widmanstätten
microstructure was found throughout the entire joint section due to the eutectoid reaction.
The β-lamellar width was ~1µm in width and 37µm in length. No voids or cracks along the
joint were found. Furthermore, no intermetallic compounds were observed in the joint, which
have been commonly observed in the brazed joint for Ti-based alloys, as shown in table2.
Because the acicular phases are found to be harder than the equiaxed phases, developing
an acicular α-Widmanstätten microstructure improves the mechanical properties. Besides, as
seen in Fig.5c and d, no obvious microstructure variation was presented in the Ti-6Al-4V
6
![Page 7: 1 Introduction - Imperial College London · Web view2011/07/16 · Furthermore, no intermetallic compounds were observed in the joint, which have been commonly observed in the brazed](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022071406/60fc0ffb8da7f978bf423eba/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
matrix through the developed brazing process. The duplex microstructure is dominating.
Meanwhile, phase and crystal orientation maps were provided by the EBSD technique.
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Fig.5 the microstructure of the ductility of brazing joined Ti-6Al-4V samples (SEM)
(a) The microstructure of the joint; (b) The magnification of the center in the joint;(c) and
(d) the microstructure of the matrix before and after brazing
Interface microstructure Matrix Filler metal composition ref.
acicular Widmanstätten microstructure with no intermettalics Ti-6Al-4V Ti-18Zr-15Cu-10Ni,wt% [this
study]Zr2Cu, Ti2Cu and (Ti,Zr)2Ni intermetallic compounds Ti-6Al-4V Ti-26.8Zr-13Ni-13.9Cu,wt.% [11]ZrO2/TiO+TiO2+Cu2Ti4O+Ni2Ti4O/α-Ti+(Ti,Zr)2(Cu,Ni)eutectic/(Ti,Zr)2(Cu,Ni)/acicular Widmanstäten
Ti-6Al-4V and Zirconia Ti47-Zr28-Cu14-Ni11,at.% [3]
a fine lamellareutectic joint microstructure consisting of α-Ti and ɣ-[Ti(Zr)]zCu (tetragonal MoSie-type ) phase Ti-6AI-4V 25Ti-25Zr-50Cu,wt.% [12]
Cu/Ni[Ti(Zr)]2 and Lave(Cu/Ni)2[Ti,(Zr)] Pure titanium(Ti-CP) Ti-27Zr-14Cu-13Ni,wt% [13]
Cu/Ni[Ti(Zr)]2 and Lave(Cu/Ni)2[Ti,(Zr)] Ti-6Al-4V Ti-27Zr-14Cu-13Ni,wt% [13]
a continuously segregated phase regarded as a [Ti,(Zr)]2(Cu,Ni) intermetallic phase;the acicular Ti-rich grains
Ti-6Al-4V 62.7Zr-11.0Ti-13.2Cu-9.8Ni-3.3Be,wt% [8]
three distinctive phases( a Ti-rich phase alloyed with low Cu, Ni,Zr contents, a Cu-Ni rich Ti phase and a Cu-Ni-Zr rich Ti phase)
Ti-6Al-4V and SP-700 Ti-20Zr-20Cu-20Ni,wt% [14]
Widmanstättenstructure consisting mainly of α-Ti, β-Ti and Ti-Zr-rich phase and a small amount of brittle intermetallics Ti-6Al-4V
Ti50-Zr27-Cu8-Ni4-Co3-Fe2-Al3-Sn2-Si1,at.% [15]
1Cr18Ni9Ti/Ag-rich/CuTi2/Ti-Cu-rich/β-Ti/TC4Ti-6Al-4V to stainless steel (1Cr18Ni9Ti)
AgCuTi filler [16]
Table 2 a summary of published results for brazing Ti-based alloys
7
Matrix
Matrix
Joint
Joint
![Page 8: 1 Introduction - Imperial College London · Web view2011/07/16 · Furthermore, no intermetallic compounds were observed in the joint, which have been commonly observed in the brazed](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022071406/60fc0ffb8da7f978bf423eba/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Tensile direction
Interface
Matrix
Interface
Matrix
In the joint most of the grains had a hard and brittle hcp crystal structure (93 vol.%)
and the rest had a relatively soft and ductile bcc structure (as seen in Fig 6a). It is found that
the microstructure of the interface was homogeneous. In addition, the relatively large grains
with [110](bcc) (in green color, as shown in Fig.6b) observed separated in the joint
corresponded to [10-10](hcp), which is the hard orientation to the tensile direction.
(a) (b)
Fig.6 the microstructure of the brazing joined Ti-6Al-4V samples (EBSD)(a) Phases distribution of the joint ;(b) Grain orientation of the joint and the matrix
3.4 Elements distribution of the joint
Fig.7 demonstrates the composition of the elements across the joint measured by the
EDX technique. Al and V diffused from the matrix into the joint, while the Zr, Cu and Ni
elements diffused from the joint into the matrix. Compared with the composition of the filler
alloy(Ti-18Zr-15Cu-10Ni wt.%), the composition of the joint (Ti-(2.3~6)Al-(2.3~3)V-
(2.6~5.5)Zr-(2~4)Cu-(2~3)Ni wt.%) is significantly different from the original filler
composition.
8
![Page 9: 1 Introduction - Imperial College London · Web view2011/07/16 · Furthermore, no intermetallic compounds were observed in the joint, which have been commonly observed in the brazed](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022071406/60fc0ffb8da7f978bf423eba/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Fig.7 the element distribution in the brazing joined Ti-6Al-4V samples
4 DiscussionThe BFMs for Titanium alloys can be divided into two groups. One is named Ti-based
filler metal with no Zr element. The other is named Zr-based filler metal with a Zr content
more than 50%. Both of them usually cause the formation of brittle intermetallic in joints (as
listed in Tab.2), which weakens the joint mechanical properties. In this study, TiZr-based
BFMs were designed to balance the brazing temperature, the microstructure and the strength
of the joint.
The literature results (e.g. the composition of the filler metal, the brazing process, and
the tensile strength of the brazing samples) for brazing the Ti-based alloy (especially the Ti-
6Al-4V) are summarized in Fig.8. In Fig.8, the area can be divided into four zones by the line
of brazing temperature as 960℃ and the line of strength of brazing samples as 800MPa. It is
better to make the brazing process in zone I without intermetallic in the joint. In addition, the
strain at the joints has not been published. Compared with the literature results, as shown in
Table 2 and Fig.8, the microstructure and the tensile strength achieved here is better, which
was carried out below the β-phase transformation temperature to maintain the microstructure
of the matrix.
9
![Page 10: 1 Introduction - Imperial College London · Web view2011/07/16 · Furthermore, no intermetallic compounds were observed in the joint, which have been commonly observed in the brazed](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022071406/60fc0ffb8da7f978bf423eba/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Fig.8 The literature for brazing Ti-based alloys
(Some of the tensile strength was based on the rule that the shear strength is 0.577 of
maximum tensile strength by Dieter (2001))
The reduction of Zr content within the Zr-based filler material at a certain extent was
found to retain the melting point of the brazing filler material in our earlier research [10].It
remains in the lower brazing temperature below the β phase transition temperature.
Meanwhile, based on the Ti-Zr phase diagram, Ti and Zr elements are infinitely mutual
soluble with each other. Due to the size difference between Zr and Ti, the increase of Zr
might increase the solid solution hardening. However, the more Zr content present in the
filler metal, the more likely the segregation of elements as Ti,Zr,Cu,Ni occurs. This tendency
was prone to form the intermetallic compounds, as shown in table 2. For example, Pang et al
[15] increased the Zr content to design their novel multicomponent
Ti50Zr27Cu8Ni4Co3Fe2Al3Sn2Si1 (at.%) amorphous BFM which offered improved shear
strength of joints. However, intermetallic compounds were still formed during the brazing
process. This resulted in lower shear strength and ductility compared to our study. Thus,
appropriate control of Zr content is critical for determining the joint strength. The balance of
the solid strengthening, the brazing temperature and the formation of intermetallic
compounds is achieved in this study.
5 ConclusionsIn this study, the designed Ti-based BFMs as Ti-18Zr-15Cu-10Ni wt.% were applied to
balance the brazing temperature, the microstructure and the strength of the joint. The
employed brazing process was 930 °C for 3600s. The strength and the ductility of brazing
joined Ti-6Al-4V samples were evaluated by conventional tensile tests with a DIC 2D-strain
10
1-this study;2-[12];3-[8];4-[3];5-[13];6-[14];7-[13];8-[3];9-[16]
![Page 11: 1 Introduction - Imperial College London · Web view2011/07/16 · Furthermore, no intermetallic compounds were observed in the joint, which have been commonly observed in the brazed](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022071406/60fc0ffb8da7f978bf423eba/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
field measurement. Results were confirmed with micro-hardness tests. Microstructures and
phases were analyzed by SEM and EBSD. The following conclusions can be drawn:
1) The fine and interlocking acicular Widmanstätten microstructure (with β lamellar ~ 1um in
width) was found throughout the entire joint section due to the eutectoid reaction. The filler
elements diffused into the matrix with relatively uniform distribution in the joints.
2) Due to the fine acicular Widmanstätten microstructure, the grain with hard orientation and
the solid solution strengthening effects, the ultimate strength of the brazed samples showed
similar strength to the one without brazing joints.
3) No fracture was found at the brazing joints. All the fractures occurred in the matrix with
local tensile stain up to 20%. The localized tensile plastic strain at the braze joint is ~6.3%.
4) Composition of the joint can be described as Ti-(2.3~6)Al-(2.3~3)V-(2.6~5.5)Zr-(2~4)Cu-
(2~3)Ni wt.%, which is significantly different to that of the original filler, both in elements
and content, due to the elements’ diffusion during brazing.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to appreciate Mr.YongLi, Mr.WeiXiong, Mr.ChongZhao,
Ms.BoChen, Pro.Jianguo Lin and Pro.ShushengShi. Significant support was also received
from the Chinese Scholarship Council of the Ministry of Education and the AVIC Centre for
Structural Design and Manufacture at Imperial College London, which is funded by the
Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC).
References
[1] Shapiro A.E., FlomY.A.. Brazing of titanium at temperatures below 800 °C: review and prospective application. Proceedings of 8th International Conference in Brazing.2007[2] Shapiro A., RabinkinA.. State of the art of titanium-based brazing filler metals. Welding J., 2003. 83 (10). pp: 36–43. [3] Shiue R. K., Wu S. K., Chen Y. T., et al.. 2008. Infrared brazing of Ti50Al50 and Ti-6Al-4V using two Ti- based filler metal metals. Intermetallics. 16(9).pp:1083-1089.[4]JingYongjuan, Li Xiaohong, Yue Xishan. Research and analysis of processing parameter for brazing honeycomb sandwich construction in titanium alloy. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2012.13.pp:137-139 (in chinese) [5] Elrefaey A., TillmannW.. Effect of brazing parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties of titanium joints. J Mater Process Tech., 2009. 209(10)pp: 4842-4849. [6]Ganjeh E., Sarkhosh H., Bajgholi M.E., et al.. Increasing Ti-6Al-4V brazed joint strength equal to the base metal by Ti and Zr amorphous filler metal alloys. Materials characterization. 2012.71.pp:31-40.
11
![Page 12: 1 Introduction - Imperial College London · Web view2011/07/16 · Furthermore, no intermetallic compounds were observed in the joint, which have been commonly observed in the brazed](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022071406/60fc0ffb8da7f978bf423eba/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
[7] Leyens C., Peters M., 2013. Titanium and Titanium Alloys. Wiley-VCH, WeinheimFrick W.R.. 1991. Brazing Handbook. American Welding Society, Miami, Florida [8] Lee M.K., Lee J.G.. 2013. Mechanical and corrosion properties of Ti–6Al–4V alloy joints brazed with a low-melting-point 62.7Zr–11.0Ti–13.2Cu–9.8Ni–3.3Be amorphous filler metal. Materials characterization. 81.pp:19-27. [9] Rabinkin A., Liebermann H., Pounds S., et al.. 1991. Amorphous TiZr - basemetglas® brazing filler metals. Scripta Metallurgic.. 25(2).pp: 399-404. [10]Jing Yongjuan, Yue XiSHan, Gao XingQiang, et al.. 2016. The influence of Zr content on the performance of TiZrCuNi brazing filler. Materials Science & Engineering A. 678 .pp:190-196. [11]Liu Y., Hu J., Zhang Y., GuoZ.. 2013. Interface Microstructure of the Brazed Zirconia and Ti-6Al-4V Using Ti-based Amorphous Filler metal. Science of Sintering., 45.pp:313-321. [12]Botstein O.. Brazing of titanium-based alloys with amorphous 25wt.%Ti-25wt.%Zr-50wt.%Cu filler Metal. Materials Science and Engineering, A.1994. 188.pp: 305-315. [13]Ganjeh E., SarkhoshH.. Microstructural, mechanical and fractographical study of titanium-CP and Ti–6Al–4V similar brazing with Ti-based filler. Materials Science & Engineering A. 2013. 559:119-129.[14]Chang C.T., Wu Z.Y., Shiue R.K., Chang C.S.. 2007. Infrared brazing Ti–6Al–4V and SP-700 alloys using the Ti–20Zr–20Cu–20Ni braze alloy .Materials Letters. 61: 842-845. [15]Pang Shujie, Sun Lulu, XiongHuaping, et al. 2016.A multicomponent TiZr-based amorphous brazing filler metal for high-strength joining of titanium alloy. ScriptaMaterialia., 117.pp:55-59[16]Yue X., He P., Feng J.C., Zhang J.H., et al.. 2008. Microstructure and interfacial reactions of vacuum brazing titanium alloy to stainless steel using an AgCuTi filler metal. Materials characterization. 59(12).pp: 1721-1727.
12