1 integarated land resource page(1-98)

8/8/2019 1 Integarated Land Resource Page(1-98)

1/15

vP.C. 1Govemment of PakistanPlanning Commission

Proforma for DeveloPment Project(Research)

INTEGRATED LAND RESOIIRCESURVEYS ANDEVALUATIONOF THE UNMAPPED PARTSOF THE COUNTRY

SOIL SURVEY OF PAKISTA}I(Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock)LAHORE

March,2000


2/15

arp[ft1*ar

Code Number for Project(To be filled in byPlanning Commissiqn;PROJECT DIGEST

l. Name of ProiectIntegrated Land Resource Surveys and Evaluation of the unsurveyed/unmapped parts(l5percent) ofthe country

2. Authorities resnonsible fori. Sponsoringii..Executioniii. Operation and maintenance

3. Time requtred for completion of Proiect:4. a) Plan provision:

The project is not included in the current five yearfinancd out of block provision for the programmeproject is Rs.7.773 millionWaTrants for inclusion of the nroiect in the olan JISoil Survey of Pakistan (SSP) is the sole custodian of land resourse information and have Imandate of preparing an inventory of soilAand resources of the country. So far. {

b) lVaTrants for inclusion of the nroiect in the olanmandate of preparing an inventory of soilAand resources of the county. So far,information of more than 85Yo part of the counby have been collected and prodlced in theform of maps & reports. Due to constraints, and specially lack of dependablefield vehicles the departuent was unable to collect land resource data of thelSYo The project is aimed at to the data for theunmapped part country and to enable the organisation to store the datato be used for sustainable land use planning. Now field vehicles have been procuredfu9ugh a recently concluded Dutch fimded project, and therefore field surveys could beundertaken confidently subject to the availability of funds.The proposed project agrees with the overall objectives of the Agriculture Sector and withthe recommendations of the National Commission on Afrcdhre, (198g) whichemphasises that: "research in agriculture should be carried out soil families (soif groups)wise so that the results could be applied more confidently to similar soils on farmer,sfields, thus not only cutting down thJiost of research but alio making the research resultsmore meaningful',.The Commission report further recommends an integrated rangeland management,based on systematic rangeland classification and assessmint of theii forage and hlvestockproduction potential. The framework so prepared will provide a completi picture of thepresent and potential status of the rangelands, and will gUide in formulating plans for

2

Minisbry of Food Agriculture and LivestockSoil Survey of PakistanSoil Survey of Pakistan36 months

plan. The project is proposed to beindicated"'Amount proposed for the 4li


3/15

t\enhancing forage/fodder and livestock production and livestock products (milk" meat,wool etc.).

6. Capj1glgggtgl&is]g: (inmillionruPees)Rg7.773

. F,orcign exchange Costs : NilRs7.773

7. Annual recurrins expendifure aftqr completionLocal : NilForcrgn eichange : Nil5.,s:ffi:j.:: $j i. Identification, classification, mapping and reporting land resources and establishing

'Assessing current and potential suitabilities both qualitatively and quantitatively of; land systems (soil-vegetation-climate units) on the basis of their bio-physico-characteristics for different land use alternatives including crops, forestry,r-ange and livestock.

$lspggesting steps for overallrupgradation of lifc.style,of,'the people of:the,.mthrough the career of agriculture, foreshy livestock, wildlife protection, tornim and

iiv. Identi&ing hot spots (ecologically/environmentally degraded areas), causes and.'.': impacts and to suggest ecotogically/ technically and socio-economically viablei. measiures for reversaValleviation of the damages.v; To provide hands on training to the rmtrained staff of the organisation in landresoure suryeys and evaluation.vi. To refurbish the newly built auditorium within the premises of SSP.

Checked byApprovedby

Soil Survey of Pakistan.


4/15

5PART ..B'

PROJECT DESCRIP'TION AND FINANCING9. I.ocation of Proiect: (hogress map attached)

Integrated land resources surveys and evaluation of the unsurveyed/unmapped parts,comprising the fotlowing administrative units of the country.l. Turbat disfrict2. Paqigur "3. Northern Thar4. Waziristan Agency (North and South)

and gaps inl.IlVFP :11326 + 4005. AndJammu & Kashmir6. Baltistan

:22539Y.,m2= 16891 " ,=22700 'l: ll726K#:13,2971rco2:29715Klrf

Total = IGGExmzField operation will be managed &om the Headquarters (Central Office) Lahore and the staffof. ,',, fu field offices (Sindh-Hyderaba4 Balochistan-Quetta and N.W.F..P-Peshawar) will also be',,-. involved.[:i.li+f .rtrvoweo.*- i.f.r' si-'r: -:

i,,,.1 .10. Existine facilities and brief history::, ':Soil Snrvey of Pakistan (SSP) was established in 1962 with the mandate of preparingy ofsoil resources offakisla tbrough reconnaissance soil surveys anC assisting tUeof Pakistan as well as the public organisations and research institutions in use oflesources data for sustainable landuse plan"ing and resource management.

$$, g. SSPis the sole custodian of soil./land resogrce information and no other o,rgdnisation in''r. F country is doing similar research work. Since its establishment, SSP have covered more thanIt,3-99,000 km2 (857o) out of the counry's total 881493 k-'i;;-"*" tl"r"a-gAJK and' ltlgr&ern areas). The inventory so far prepared consists of 66 published ,.port" with more than," 3q accompanying maps on soils, geomorpholory, present land use, iand capability, and, Sjculturl development, at reconnaissance level. In addition about 860,000 ha. of l*d *d",differyry forest plantations, soil conservation/watershed management and drainage schemes andover 8,000 ha. under agricultural research stations and seed farms have been covered throughsemidetailed and detailed soil surveys and presented in over 400 reports and maps.More than 750 soil series, with 3-10 phaseVvariants of each series, have been*TgroTd throughout Pakistan. Detailed information on characterizatton(chemicaUphysical) ofmain soil series are available with the SSp.

ll. Descrintion of proiect:a. Justification

Soils are basic nahral land resource as well as environmental factor and SSp is the onlyorganisation of the counhy responsible for collecting, evaluating and disseminating informationon these resources. To this end SSP maintain a data base on land resources of the county. so far*tg lot Sotl part(85%) of the country have already been collected/mapped and reported.rtrc pro;ect ts aimed at to collect land resotrce data for the remaining 15% unmapped areas ofthe counby. This will enable the SSP to provide and correlate the soit information of the wholecountrv.


5/15

The unmapped areas comprise the peripheral and marginal lands. No informationland resources including soils, vegetation, present land use, g;azi51g capacities,production systems of these areas are available. Al though per tmit value ofthese areas[l but their large expanse andthe dependence oflarge population (humad, livestock) onmake.these areas vety imFortant. Therefore, information on the land resourc"s'i" upiqite;to undertake any viable and socially acceptable development effort thete for the"?f"th" p*t lnrybiqPts.-1t[s31 importantl/ the project wiII provide an opportunity to thefltfoed technical staff of an on -the-job taining facility, since land r"so,11"" surveys andHg.+,ry,pfrryly technical and field oriented assignment.-

progr-anlme is envisaged to cover 116868 Km2. area at an estimated cost of; thlt means a nominal cost of Rs.65/Km2. The programme is deemed to bei.. .i _ _Y -vvuvs rv Wpbases: two sreas per year. The remaining Rs.350,000 is allocated for refirbishingrwently constructed under a project " strengthening of soil Suney oTnewly acquired GIS IPiRS and rational Database facilities will be establisheddata processing and value added information generation.

is engaged in such activity. The soil/land Fesource data gatheredsuwcys will be available to Govemment and different coicernedin planning and implementation of various projects aiming at,iJ-r;tft";ijT"lg1!91 erosion conrrol, wajershed management, rainfd agricirtt're,! rsmaqrafrorr, Erosron conrol, watrshed management rainfd agriculture,fi{Eelogrynt. gd environmental protection i"-pi"il"" tu.l, activiticsgtounds. .'.. : ..1;".'t'\ -: ". -.thcse

Il.

Hf*:4t ft,

.f lana resource. ry-"y and evaluation reports will be produced in the next three:-r3oT *t T:* froT.: maps and detailed information on soil" climate,rtr rcsources, livestock- and human population, urhich will be purpos oriented,progranmevprojects oriented, planning oriented and policy oriented. Thus thefljf!|"-t,:,f these surveys will be io enhance agricultrnal production (food, fodder,rno uvestock) without drm^grng the resources.T};;fYis:9fi:td is arready.lvailable with the deparbnent. However an ecologrwiu be hirea on 'no* contraca*vcons'iJnlviffi"Iffifi:;:ffi4ffi::1ffi I #i,i.r;'rfindings will be disseminated in the form of manc nnrr ramrrs qvuvruwD' ^"o ( f '".-qlL 7"indings will be disseminated in the form of maps and reports.

ti(,, tuF T*rffro*7*at1*"3:yt^"..r:iol:"1.tr" py":r-{l !" monitored and evaluated by submitting monthly&ke'J ?,pqgrcss report of the activities to the MinFAI*13. Validitv of the exoenditures:The capital expenditure estimates are prepared in March, 2000 and are still valid.


6/15

?

IFOR INTEGRATED I,AI{D RESOI'RCE ST]RVEY AI{D

Rs.1205340Rs.120534Rs.1325874 ,r",,i -' -

Say Rs. 13260 -00 ,,

Rs.3,13,900

-Rs.85.83Rs.14,733Rs.52,200Rs.8191 Say 8,200

or TTIRBAT DTSTRTCT(eppror.)

of field vehicles Rs.4,20,000Rs.313900Rs.l814402 Nos. @Rs.907201'contactual exPert for ecologicalper month Rs.120,000charges @Rs.200 perday Rs.l70,(n0

TotaltGrandToal

= 22539d := 90 days (approx.)structure and TA

15.f.5 Erpcnditures in brief:Expenditure per K.m2Expenditure per dayExpendinre per officer including consultantExpendinre per offrcial

160001080001080004s90036000


7/15

I

I.

1

15.2 REQUIREMENTS FOR TNTEGRATED LAND RESOTJRCE SURVEYS ANDEVALUATION OF PANJGUR DISTRICT15,2.1 ErPenditure (aPProx), POL and rePairsZ TNDA!, Sut"tlit imageries 2 Nos' @ Rs90720{ f"y."ttt to the contractual expert for ecologicalstudies @ 40000 Per month5 HoteVGJest House Charges @ Rs'200 per day(inc luding consultant)

TotalEscalatiorlcontingencies @ l0%

Grand TotalSav

Rs.350,000Rs.260250Rs.181440Rs.100000Rs.141.000Rs.10,32690Rs.103269Rs.l 1,35959Rs.11,36000

15.2.2 Extent of the Area15.2.3 Field period

= 16891Km2= 75 days approx.

Rs.500,000Rs.313900Rs.181440Rs.120000

Details of party structure and TAStaffsoecification No. ofstaff Days D.A rateRs. Total D.ARs.SupervisorOflicersTraineesField WorkersDriversVehicles

I44644

30757575,:

40030030085100

120009000090,000382s030,000

Total Rs. 26025015.2.5 Expenditure in briefExpendinre per Km2 : Rs.67.25Expenditue per day = Rs.15146.66

Expenditure per Officer (including consultant) : Rs.43300Expenditures per Official = Rs.6825I5.3 REQTIIREMET{TS FOR INTEGRATED LAND REOUCE SERVEYS ANDEVALUATION OF NORTHERN THAR

15.3.1 Expenditure (approx.)POL and repairs _TA/DASatellite images 2 Nos. @ Rs.90720/-Payment to the contractual expert forecological studies @ Rs.4000 per monthHotel/Guest House Charges @ Rs.200 per day(including consultant) Rs.170,000

Total Rs.1285340Escalatiorlcontingencies @10% Rs.128534Grand Total Rs.1413874SavRs.1414000


8/15

I )

15,3.2 Extent of the area15.3.3 Field work Period

:22700Kd= 90 days (approx.)

15.3.4. Detailsof Pg@ resStaffspecification

No. of staff Days D.A rateRs.

Total D.ARs.

SupervisorOfficersTraineesField WorkersDriversVehicles

I446''44

409090

400300300

16000108000108000

90t: 85100 45,90036000Total Rs. 313900

15.3.5 Expenditures in briefEipenditure per Km2 Rs.62.29Expenditures per day Rs.l57l l.l IExpenditures per officer * consultant Rs.52200Expenditure per official Rs.8l90 Say 820015.4 REQTTTREMENTS FOR INTEGRATED LAI\D RESOIIRCES SUR EYS

AND EVALUATION oF WAZIRISTAFI (North and South) AIIIDGAPS IN I\TWT'P15.4.1 Expenditure (approx.)

POL and repairs Rs.300,000TA/DA Rs.227150Satellite imageries .............Nos. @ Rs.90720 Rs.l81440payment to the Contractual expert fJr '--1-l-]:- hrOrO 7ecological studies @ \1jlOO!aglu0g[L--' Rs.86700Hotel/Guest House Charges @ Rs.ZOO per day Rs. 123000Total Rs.918290Escalation/contingencies @ l0o/o Rs.91829Grand Total Rs.101019

Say Rs. 10.10,000

15.4.2 Extent of the area 11326 + 400 = I 1726 sq km15.4.3 Field work period = 65 days5.4.4.Details of structure and TA resStaffspecification No. ofstaff Days D.A rateRs. Total D.ARs.Supervisor0fficers

TraineesField WorkersDriversVehicles

I44644

306565656565

40030030085100

1200078000780003315026000

Total D.A Rs.22715


9/15

al^

15.4.5 Expenditure in briefExpenditure per Km2 Rs.B6.l3Expendittres per day Rs.15538.46Expenditure per officer + consultant Rs.37770Expenditures per official Rs.59l5

*The gaps in MVFP will be surveyed by Waziristan field par[y on their way to the field area.15.5 REQTJIREMTNS FOR INTEGRATED LAI\D RESORUCE SURVEYS ANDEVALUATION OF AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR

15.5.1 Expenditure (approx.)POL and repairs Rs.300,000TAIDA Rs.247700Satellite images 2 Nos. @ Rs.90720 Rs.181440Payment to the conhactual expert forecological studies @ Rs.40000 per month Rs.93300HoteVGuest House Charges @ Rs.200 per dayincluding consultant Rs.134000Total Rs.956440Escalation/contingencies @ l0o/o Rs.95644Grand Total Rs.1052084SayRs.1052000

15.5.2 Extent of the area15.5.3. Field work period

1329770 days

f5.5.4 Details of ndT

Total Rs. 24770015.5.5 Expenditure in briefExpenditure per Km2 = Rs.79.l lExpenditwe per day : Rs.15028Expenditures per officer * consultant = Rs.14130Expenditure per official = Rs.6370

it

structure and TA resraffspecification No. of staff Days D.A rateRs. Total D.ARs.SupervisorOfficersTraineeOfficersField WorkersDriversVehicles

I44644

4070707070

400300

85100

1600084000840003570028000


10/15

Ill

15.6 REQUIRXMENTS FOR INTEGRATED LAND RESOURCE SURVEYS ANDEVALUCATION OF BALTISTAN AREA15.6. I ExPenditure (aPProx.)POL and repairsTAIDASatellite images 2 Nos. @Rs.90720Payment to the contractual expert forecological studies @ Rs.40000 per monthHoteVGuest House Charges @ Rs.200 per dayincluding consultant TotalEscalation/csnlingencies @ l0%Grand Total

15.6.2 Extent of the area15.6.3 Field work period

15.6.5 Expenditure in briefExpenditure per Km2Expenditures per dayExpenditures per officer * consultantExpenditures per official

STJMMARY OF TOTAL EXPENDITURES

= Rs.500,000: Rs.347,000= Rs.181440=Rs.133300Rs. 188,000Rs.1349740Rs.134974Rs.1484714SayRs.1485000

=29715Kmz: 100 days

: Rs.49.97= Rs.1485097= Rs.57730= Rs.9100

15.6.4 Details of party structure and TAStaffspecification

No. ofstaff Days D.A rateRs. TotalD.ARs.SupervisorOffrcersTraineeOffrcersField WorkersDriversVehicles

I44644

30100100100100100

40030030085'y

1600012000012000051,00040,c00

Total Rs. 347,000

_S.No. Name of Survev area Resources requirementst.2.3.4.5.6.

Turabt DistrictPar,jg* DistrictNorthern TharWaziristan (North and South )and Gapes in NWFPAzad Jammu and KashmirBaltistan area

Rs.13,26,0001,136,000Rs.1,414,000Rs.1,010,000Rs.1,052,000Rs.1,485,000Total Rs.7.423.000

l0


11/15

tv16. Financial Plan:

i. The project will be financed by federal government under the Public Sector DevelopmentProgrammeii. No recurrent expenditures are involved.17. Risk analysis:Non provision of frrnds, non availability of contractual ecological expert, and escalation ofprices of P.O.L and law and order situation may delay the project.18. Annual phasing of financial requirements

19. Grounds for prioritvPakistan is basically an agricultural county and its about two-thirds area is natural

grazrng land and-or of foresVwatersfusd importance. Although much is being done about thecultivated land in the country, little heed is paid towards the valuable rangeland andforest/watershed resources, the main source of animal protein for the people. The potential andlimitations of this natural resource have not been fully appreciated so far. Although per unitvalue of these lands for pastoral use is low, their large extent and the dependence of localpopulation on them make the total value of these resources appreciable. Besides being themainstay of country's livestock industry, these lands are also productive in terms of otherresources like wood, water, wildlife and recreation. Due to neglect and historical misuse, therangelands productivity has fallen to about 0-30 percent of their potential. Continued rangelandand forest land deterioration has not only reduced the forage and livestock production but is alsoadversely affecting the subsidiary role of rangeland as watershed, wildlife habitat andenvironmental improver.

Too much disturbance of the green cover of the fragile/marginal lands has not onlyhanned the livestock and forest industry but also has disturbed the physical, hydrological andbiological balances, Soil erosion has been accelerated, moisfure regime has changed, most of thesprings and streams have either ceased to flow or have become intermittent and undependable.Heavy trampling by livestock, besides damaging the vegetation, has caused surface soil sealingand consequently decreased infilnation and increased runoff, resulting in accelerated soilerosion. Bare and impermeable surface leads to sudden flash floods which sometimes causephenomenal losses to life and property after heavy rains followed by periods when neithersprings nor streams flow. ln addition, the channelso stock-watering points and reservoirs aresilted up and as such their water storage capacities are reduced tremendously. Animal responsesunder these circumstances are characterised by slow growth, low body weight, diminishing binhrate, low and poor quality wool and hair production, low resistance against diseases and climaticharshness and high mortality of the livestock.

Nevertheless, the presently vast non-productive lands of the country could be mademore productive by their judicious utilisation tluough proper management. As production isll

Break ups Physical Works %o Resource requirements (Million (Rs.)Ist year2ndyear3rd year

36.1 831.1932.63

2.462 + 0.350:2.8122.4242.537

Total 100 7.773


12/15

I

I\f\l/

based primarily on the natural self regenerating vegetation, this constituent would respond bestto the impact of proper management. Present methods of range/forest management too often putemphasis on livestock production and tree plantation rather than on the primary source.

The damage done to the grazing and forest lands and eventually to the livestock andforest industy may be atftibuted to the lack of understanding of range management concept,absence qf ssmprehensive national policy, lack of independent management agency, defectivemanagement stratery and lack of comprehensive resource survey, classification and evaluation.For the rapid and efficient development, land resource surveys are used as an essential tool.Besides their function as inventories, survey of this nature would effectively assist concernedagencies to develop appropriate policies and programmes.

The frrnction of land resource surveys should be either to help solve specific problemswhich restrict production or to provide some form of guidance for action. But, in any qme,whether the survey is related to problems of production, policy or conservation, there is need fora prior clear understanding of the questions to be answered. This will determine how the surveyis to be done and the kind of data to be collected as well the scale of mapping.Finally the young and least trained staff of the SSP is in dire need of getting on-the-job-training which could not be arranged earlier because no/or major field activities could beundertaken due to limited frurds and specially non-availability of dependable field vehicles. Theproject areas are the most harsb, rugged and remote ones. The deparfuent has now acquiredfield vehicles through a recently concluded Dutch fimded project.It is hoped that the study will prove a step forward in evaluation and utilisation of rangelands in Pakistan by providing information for their development through proper managementbased on ecological principles.

20. ConsultantSSP staff is exclusively competent in identification, classification and mapping of soilsof the country, but have not sufftcient knowledge of ecological surveys and evaluation of landresources. Thus an expert in ecology surveys and land resource evaluation will be hired frommarket to assist and train the soil survey teams in data collection for proper land evaluation.

21. Trainins to the staff membersSoil Survey is a field based technolory rather than academic. So SSP trains its freshOfficers by attaching them with the field parties headed by experienced and senior staff

members during the Reconnaissance Strrvey operation. But unfortunately for the last two decadeSSP could not underlake field activities, except a few, due to budget constraints. This situationhas created a scarcity of technical staffas the experienced ones are getting retired and unfiainedare provided no opportunity to get and gain field experience. As such the future of theorganisation is at stake. To overcome this unhealthy situation, four technical officers will beartached with each field party to work with the &ained of{icers and gain practical experience inSoil Survey worMand resource evaluation and ecological study techniques. This will help thejunior staff members to obtain comprehensive knowledge and expertise level by working indifferent physiographic units of the county. They will also learn to use the latesttools/requirement which the organisation acquired during SSSP project.

t2


13/15

.',''

l\llANNUEXURE-I

Details of the Furniture for refurbishrng of building1. Chairs 230 Nos. (caned) @ Rs.600 =2. Big stage table one No. =3. Stage Chairs fourNos. @ Rs.2000 =4. Small tables four Nos. @ Rs.l500 =5. Audio Video with accessories =

Rs.138000Rs. 800Rs. 8000Rs. 6000Rs. I 58000

TotalEscalation @ \0%

Grand Totalsay Rs.349800Rs.3,50,000

Rs.31800

IJ


14/15

(I

4{PROGRESS IUIAP(RECONNAtSSANCE sotL SURVEYS)r. ratt^L^lô taatt. ouiial rtttt FAWALPT{O| tatt

a. LAAOi! rlraa. yuttar roeta riarr. ruLlai lovrt traaa. taarsal iataa, axttxxuPut^ tlsarc. tHAL iOFtf raalr r. fiaL aourt ttaft2 D. I XXAi tatt!t. laigooxa ttatta. ouJtaiwat^_StaLaot I ta,11. lhaita tarl taatrt. laiawaltaoai ttttrr. taaawatPui rtrltr. cttt!cLLtuR rart?o. oHot(, tattlr. nYoci^laD trrr22 XtsAttPUA tttr2!. ruzatt^p6âa itrr24, {awaStiad tltt:t- J^COa^!iO-Utr^ turafrao tat,24. llixaNA rtTt

34. sFPCt rHA! taal66. XiUZOAi taat5t. KOitstAi ltta! itt,ti FAiA No.ti tt6ta! kaciai ttaa40. ctacat . xdatlt ttatar. GwôaF ttla42, GUJFATW Ia (REVIAEO) !l!r

El au.r.r Br.rtrdf,tr ssrr.r cooat'r.dE] x.ps conet.t.dfl nocort comet.l.d

ilABAO

ElUtd.ilr9 rrrrr.d[Ell uec.ttoe com?rltI R.vl..d rcport pri

AOIL gURVEY OF PAKILAHORE 5'780tia.. aal ,atttttraatatt rar aa2 /

lc) cottrrthr !y roil t{.{.t ot e.rr.r.._ ^r

D

E I.F..rd..po.a.o6pr.rcd@l r.p, .nd ..port rrrnr.d m xor !urv.r.d

r.! o!r?!t cnsrril D..i9rr Dr..ato. oanr.l: I!anl.c ahd.d


15/15

Comments

i):

ii)iii)

iv)

v)

vi)vii)

., lb-INTEGRATED LAND RESO{'RCE ST]RVEYS AT.{D EVALUATIONOF THE T]NMAPPED PARTS OF THE COT]NTRY

viii)

Land survey is the regular activity of the Department of Soil Survey ofPakistan. There is no need to initiaie a project for a regular activity.The sponsors should point out under which project 85% work of land surveywas completed and who provided the financial assistance for it.In the present project, two satellite imageries have been proposed. AreaSampling Frame (using aerial photographylSPOT satellite .imagery) lrtiltconducted for the entire country under US aided project 'Agriculhrral DataCollection' by the Statistics Division. The sponsofs may use the existingsatellite imageries available with the Statistics Division and SUPARCO.A great part ofthe work suggested in the present project has already been doneunder the "Forestry Sector Master Plan' with the aid of ADB/UNDP. Thesponsors should avoid duplication of activitiesIt has been proposed to acquire services of an expert on ecology rit the cost ofRs.40,000 per month, It is suggested that the expert may be acquired ondeputation from PARC/NARC of some other government organization.The sponsors may provide detailed annual phasing of the physical work to beperformed under the project.It is a project for conducting a survey. Hence, there is no justification for anexpenditure on an auditorium which has recently been completed. Therefore,Rs.0.350 million may be deleted from the cost of the project.As it is a survey, a PC-II proforma.should be filled in and annexed to the PC-I.

1 integarated land resource page(1-98)

Documents